Brain Fingerprinting (http://www.brainwavescience.com) is one of several methods The Government uses to detect subversive thoughts in subjects, the first step in isolating potential mind control targets.

How do we determine if a person is a terrorist or spy? There is a new technology, that for the first time, allows us to measure scientifically if specific information is stored in a person’s brain. Brain Fingerprinting technology can determine the presence or absence of specific information, such as terrorist training and associations. This exciting new technology can help address the following critical elements in the fight against terrorism:

Aid in determining who has participated in terrorist acts, directly or indirectly.

Aid in identifying trained terrorists with the potential to commit future terrorist acts, even if they are in a “sleeper” cell and have not been active for years.

Help to identify people who have knowledge or training in banking, finance or communications and who are associated with terrorist teams and acts.

Help to determine if an individual is in a leadership role within a terrorist organization.

:eek:

Brain Fingerprinting (http://www.brainwavescience.com) is one of several methods The Government uses to detect subversive thoughts in subjects, the first step in isolating potential mind control targets.

Using the principal: “Forging our swords into plows”, we can use this menacing technology for positive purposes. 4 example, women can read our minds to determine if we’re good in bed or not. Men can use it to find out which women get horny at all ;) .
The expulsion of Porch Monkeys, Pork Monkeys, Bean Bags, Greaseballs, Kikes and whatever else, will render such technology obsolete for its intended purpose

.

http://www.jeffersonstate.com/images/bhc.gif

.

Brain Fingerprinting (http://www.brainwavescience.com) is one of several methods The Government uses to detect subversive thoughts in subjects, the first step in isolating potential mind control targets.



:eek:

This is scary shit, we all know the we are not far off from the terrorist blood libel, and we will be next in the line of thought criminals. If the governemnt can really detect our thoughts, Zog's reign of terror will grow and grow until we become complete thought slaves to their every needs. George orwell's fantasy is not for off to the future, these mind control mechanisms and the big brother governemnt will try to elimate dissent. We need to be doing something fast, we are tomorrow's terrorists that ZOG will try to control and disperse.

I remember watching a news section once on a device that could read what you were thinking and print it out on a screen. Sure enough they showed a guy sitting down with something attached to his head and certain words or phrases were being printed on the screen as he thought about them. Was rather slow though lol. Doesnt matter of course since that means they can eventually develop that kind of technology into something VERY deadly. And just like in Orwells 1984, you wont even be safe from yourself.

Assuming that this method is valid, the individual in question must be in custody first, and I think that in the scenarios that people here have in mind ( ;) ), if the individual is in custody in the first place, he is fucked anyway, with a government anywhere on the spectrum between that of the present-day U.S. and that in 1984. To me, this just sounds like an improved lie-detector test, with a few "bells and whistles" added.

From my knowledge of physics (I will have a M.S. in electrical engineering in a few weeks), remote probing of one's thoughts is either completely impossible according to the known laws of nature, or at best (from their point of view) extremely difficult and very far beyond current technology. If you rule out all metaphysical mechanisms (telepathy and everything of that nature), as well as far-out areas of modern physics like quantum theory being used that to probe specific brain activity, you're pretty much left with classical physics: electromagentic transmissions from the brain, which are so extremely weak from any appreciable distance that the signal would be buried in the ambient noise, and that would be just the passive, "listening" side of it, nevermind active probing. Also, even if electromagnetic signals were somehow detectable and capable of being pinpointed to one specific head, within say, a hundred yards, translating such a signal into anything meaningful would be either a nightmare (assuming that a specific EM signal could even be tied to a specific thought in a unique, one-to-one way) or impossible.

So if you multiple a chain of low probabilities, you end up with a really low overall probability: 10^-10 x 10^-10 X 10-10 = 10^-30 = this is not going to happen.

Assuming that this method is valid, the individual in question must be in custody first, and I think that in the scenarios that people here have in mind ( ;) ), if the individual is in custody in the first place, he is fucked anyway, with a government anywhere on the spectrum between that of the present-day U.S. and that in 1984. To me, this just sounds like an improved lie-detector test, with a few "bells and whistles" added.

From my knowledge of physics (I will have a M.S. in electrical engineering in a few weeks), remote probing of one's thoughts is either completely impossible according to the known laws of nature, or at best (from their point of view) extremely difficult and very far beyond current technology. If you rule out all metaphysical mechanisms (telepathy and everything of that nature), as well as far-out areas of modern physics like quantum theory being used that to probe specific brain activity, you're pretty much left with classical physics: electromagentic transmissions from the brain, which are so extremely weak from any appreciable distance that the signal would be buried in the ambient noise, and that would be just the passive, "listening" side of it, nevermind active probing. Also, even if electromagnetic signals were somehow detectable and capable of being pinpointed to one specific head, within say, a hundred yards, translating such a signal into anything meaningful would be either a nightmare (assuming that a specific EM signal could even be tied to a specific thought in a unique, one-to-one way) or impossible.

So if you multiple a chain of low probabilities, you end up with a really low overall probability: 10^-10 x 10^-10 X 10-10 = 10^-30 = this is not going to happen.Glad you cleared that up for us, Kep. That is some scary shit. Thanks.

And btw - get some edu-ma-cation in yo' ass, you illiterate bastard!

They'll probably sit us down, attach the electrodes and parade Negroids and Wegroids in front of us to see how we react. If we can fake it, they'll play a Nigger plugging a White girl to do us in for the hanging. We'd be better off that way, if it got so far