Mike Jahn
May 4th, 2004, 04:37 AM
I found this on Stormfront and it proves that the new "Soft" WN image is attracting an endless supply of Republican mainstream losers:
This is from "Americaorania" who says we should stop naming the JEW, look closely at his post, he thinks Rush Limbaugh is important to the White race. :D and look at how many times he uses the word "Liberal" as though his precious Conservatives give a damn about race:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There appears to be a widespread opinion that the key to success, is exposing the jew to society for what they really are.
I don't agree with jewish conspiracy theories, and I think the jews role in non white immigration is small in comparison to the damage done by white liberals, corporate greed, and the birth control pill.
Media/television, yes it had effect, but media in the hands of jews and media in the hands of white liberals, I don't see much of a difference. Television will always be liberal, that's basic psychology.
Radio will always be more conservative. ex) Rush Limbaugh cruxified for comments on Television, but not on Radio.
Regardless of the extent of the jewish role in our problems, I don't want a debate on this, as I'm sure it will lead no where.
My question for all those who believe in verbally attacking and exposing the jew is: Does the mean justify the end?
Our goal for the "end" is a white homeland and the preservation of the race.
Our strategy should be to accomplish this goal by whatever means necessary. As it's said, "the mean justifies the end."
So, how does attacking and exposing the jews help us accomplish this end?
It makes WN's look like crazy, ridiculious thugs, and totally alienates the mainstream. A WN who hates jews is the definition of a Nazi, as far as the public is concerned.
That will never change
Nazi is the definition of evil in our society. A group of "Nazi's" (aka, WN's who hate jews) will never take control of any governments in todays world, much less be anything but a fringe group.
Did the jews cause Nazi's to become the definition of evil through their media control? Maybe. But that's not the point.
The point is, when it comes to attacking the jews, the mean does not justify the end, because attacking the jews is the mean for an end in failure.
Instinctually, WN's have an innate drive to attack the jews for their role in our problems. I suppose that's normal.
Intelligence however, is what evolution programmed us with so we could subjugate our instincts, to make better decisions. If we didn't have a need to subjugate our instincts, we could have been programmed like insects and been: driven only by instincts, without the need for true intelligence.
Isn't our goal is to be less like the negros?
Hitler was an intelligent person. When the National Socialists attacked the jews, the mean justified the end. It helped unify the people, and it raised their racial awareness.
But hitlers war on the jew is what turned the world against racism more than anything else in history. It destroyed the eugenics movement, made the jews immune from criticism, lead to the creation of Israel, turned the United Nations against genocide, broke up the British Empire, destroyed facist Italy, and allowed communism to take over eastern europe, and subsequently paved the way for the hippie movement to take place 20 years later.
And WN's still want to continue the war on the jew?
Note: The Supreme Court only turned against racism after world war 2.
Note: The military was desgregated by Truman, not a jew, right after world war 2.
Note: Who broke the color barrier in baseball, right after world war 2?
Note: White liberal politicians played a bigger role in passing the civil rights laws and the 1965 immigration act. (lyndon johnson, ted kennedy anyone?)
I know. The jews had a hold of them all. Whitey couldn't possibly be at all responsible for the civil rights movement.
Also, if the jews used the media to demonize the Nazi's, can you really blame them? Hitler intended to exterminate them whether 6 million were killed or not.
Thus, the jews will forever hate WN's because of hitler, and WN's (aka, "Nazis") will forever hate jews for their hatred of WN's, and subsequently, WN's will be forever a fringe group and will never succeed as the last 30 years bares proof.
Some people have asked, what is the motivation of the jew to destroy the white race? What could they possibly gain from it?
The jews are so adiment at destroying white solaridy, because of their hatred of hilter
They were only moderately adiment at destroying white solaridy prior to hitler.
But all of this is irrelevant, and in the past. During the 60s movement jews were a tight group that had a monopoly on the media. Now, most jews are secular, their intermarriage rate is close to 50%, and their birth rates all across the Diaspora are well below replacement level.
In Israel, the jews will eventually be displaced by palistinians, whose fertility rate is over twice as high. It's inevitable, just like our Diaspora, unless WN's learn how to employ real strategy. The jews are a dying demographic. Attacking them serves no purpose even if they are to blame.
Comments? I would challenge anyone to a debate, who thinks attacking the Jews and Zionism is a mean that justifies an end.
It's just a way for low IQ people to satisfy their instincts.
Some people complain that our situation is so bad that we don't need more criticism that will get our spirits down . That's a bunch of BS. These people are a bunch of winers. When strategies haven't been working for the past 30 years, maybe it's about time WN's started thinking about doing something different.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Don Black, I hope you are proud of yourself......
This is from "Americaorania" who says we should stop naming the JEW, look closely at his post, he thinks Rush Limbaugh is important to the White race. :D and look at how many times he uses the word "Liberal" as though his precious Conservatives give a damn about race:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There appears to be a widespread opinion that the key to success, is exposing the jew to society for what they really are.
I don't agree with jewish conspiracy theories, and I think the jews role in non white immigration is small in comparison to the damage done by white liberals, corporate greed, and the birth control pill.
Media/television, yes it had effect, but media in the hands of jews and media in the hands of white liberals, I don't see much of a difference. Television will always be liberal, that's basic psychology.
Radio will always be more conservative. ex) Rush Limbaugh cruxified for comments on Television, but not on Radio.
Regardless of the extent of the jewish role in our problems, I don't want a debate on this, as I'm sure it will lead no where.
My question for all those who believe in verbally attacking and exposing the jew is: Does the mean justify the end?
Our goal for the "end" is a white homeland and the preservation of the race.
Our strategy should be to accomplish this goal by whatever means necessary. As it's said, "the mean justifies the end."
So, how does attacking and exposing the jews help us accomplish this end?
It makes WN's look like crazy, ridiculious thugs, and totally alienates the mainstream. A WN who hates jews is the definition of a Nazi, as far as the public is concerned.
That will never change
Nazi is the definition of evil in our society. A group of "Nazi's" (aka, WN's who hate jews) will never take control of any governments in todays world, much less be anything but a fringe group.
Did the jews cause Nazi's to become the definition of evil through their media control? Maybe. But that's not the point.
The point is, when it comes to attacking the jews, the mean does not justify the end, because attacking the jews is the mean for an end in failure.
Instinctually, WN's have an innate drive to attack the jews for their role in our problems. I suppose that's normal.
Intelligence however, is what evolution programmed us with so we could subjugate our instincts, to make better decisions. If we didn't have a need to subjugate our instincts, we could have been programmed like insects and been: driven only by instincts, without the need for true intelligence.
Isn't our goal is to be less like the negros?
Hitler was an intelligent person. When the National Socialists attacked the jews, the mean justified the end. It helped unify the people, and it raised their racial awareness.
But hitlers war on the jew is what turned the world against racism more than anything else in history. It destroyed the eugenics movement, made the jews immune from criticism, lead to the creation of Israel, turned the United Nations against genocide, broke up the British Empire, destroyed facist Italy, and allowed communism to take over eastern europe, and subsequently paved the way for the hippie movement to take place 20 years later.
And WN's still want to continue the war on the jew?
Note: The Supreme Court only turned against racism after world war 2.
Note: The military was desgregated by Truman, not a jew, right after world war 2.
Note: Who broke the color barrier in baseball, right after world war 2?
Note: White liberal politicians played a bigger role in passing the civil rights laws and the 1965 immigration act. (lyndon johnson, ted kennedy anyone?)
I know. The jews had a hold of them all. Whitey couldn't possibly be at all responsible for the civil rights movement.
Also, if the jews used the media to demonize the Nazi's, can you really blame them? Hitler intended to exterminate them whether 6 million were killed or not.
Thus, the jews will forever hate WN's because of hitler, and WN's (aka, "Nazis") will forever hate jews for their hatred of WN's, and subsequently, WN's will be forever a fringe group and will never succeed as the last 30 years bares proof.
Some people have asked, what is the motivation of the jew to destroy the white race? What could they possibly gain from it?
The jews are so adiment at destroying white solaridy, because of their hatred of hilter
They were only moderately adiment at destroying white solaridy prior to hitler.
But all of this is irrelevant, and in the past. During the 60s movement jews were a tight group that had a monopoly on the media. Now, most jews are secular, their intermarriage rate is close to 50%, and their birth rates all across the Diaspora are well below replacement level.
In Israel, the jews will eventually be displaced by palistinians, whose fertility rate is over twice as high. It's inevitable, just like our Diaspora, unless WN's learn how to employ real strategy. The jews are a dying demographic. Attacking them serves no purpose even if they are to blame.
Comments? I would challenge anyone to a debate, who thinks attacking the Jews and Zionism is a mean that justifies an end.
It's just a way for low IQ people to satisfy their instincts.
Some people complain that our situation is so bad that we don't need more criticism that will get our spirits down . That's a bunch of BS. These people are a bunch of winers. When strategies haven't been working for the past 30 years, maybe it's about time WN's started thinking about doing something different.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Don Black, I hope you are proud of yourself......