Log in

View Full Version : Chanukah - by Mel Gibson...


Rob Roy MacGregor
May 9th, 2004, 12:39 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/174404p-151891c.html

Chanukah - by Mel Gibson


By DEREK ROSE
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

He has portrayed the Crucifixion - now Mel Gibson has his sights set on the tale that led to Chanukah.

"The Passion of the Christ" director told WABC's Sean Hannity yesterday that he's planning a movie based on a Jewish rebellion nearly 200 years before the birth of Christ.

"The story that's always fired my imagination ... is the Book of Maccabees," Gibson said in the radio interview.

"It's about Antiochus, the king who set up his religion in the Temple, and forced them all to deny the true God and worship at his feet and worship false gods.

"The Maccabees family stood up, and they made war, they stuck by their guns, and they came out winning," he continued. "It's like a Western."

The revolt is said to have begun when a king's officer tried to force a priest named Mattathias to make a pagan sacrifice.

Mattathias killed the man instead, and he and his followers fled to the hills to wage a successful guerrilla war that eventually liberated Jerusalem in 165 B.C.

That victory led to the holiday of Chanukah, when a tiny amount of oil lasted eight days as the Maccabees purified the Temple in Jerusalem.

A story about heroic Jews might insulate Gibson from charges of anti-Semitism leveled by the movie's critics. But some Jews might not take kindly to Gibson, a conservative Catholic, interpreting their history.

Anti-Defamation League Executive Director Abe Foxman told the Orlando Sentinel recently that if Gibson dramatizes the rebellion, "we'll lose."

"He'll write his own history," Foxman said. "I would prefer to leave the fate of Jewish history and Hollywood to Steven Spielberg. The Maccabees ... are our sacred history."

Gibson, though, said the success of "The Passion" has silenced some of his loudest critics, and he repeated his view that the movie does not blame Jews for Christ's death.

Gibson talked politics as well as religion during the Hannity interview.

One of a small number of Hollywood conservatives, Gibson said he thinks "a lot of what" President Bush "does is good," but he has been "having my doubts of late.

"It's all to do with these weapons [of mass destruction] that we can't seem to find, and why did we go over there [to Iraq]."

The conservative talk-show host, a Bush supporter, quickly changed the subject.

Originally published on March 17, 2004

Spandau
May 9th, 2004, 12:42 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/174404p-151891c.html

Chanukah - by Mel Gibson


By DEREK ROSE
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

His brother called it. Mel's no Braveheart.

Angle
May 10th, 2004, 10:49 AM
but god forbid a non-zhid try on their history.

So why don't we try and make a low-budget version of their history (Roman-hating period, e.g.)? We can do a Monty Python-esque one, (I believe 'Holy Grail' was made with £100,000) taking Nietzsche's theory of the origin of Christianity, RaZor’s amazing snake-schnozzim, and lampoon the beanies while making a film people will actually enjoy watching. I could knock off a 90 page script in weeks.

Spandau
May 10th, 2004, 11:39 AM
So why don't we try and make a low-budget version of their history (Roman-hating period, e.g.)? We can do a Monty Python-esque one, (I believe 'Holy Grail' was made with £100,000) taking Nietzsche's theory of the origin of Christianity, RaZor’s amazing snake-schnozzim, and lampoon the beanies while making a film people will actually enjoy watching. I could knock off a 90 page script in weeks.

I like it. Hey Spengler? Good idea for a flick. After you finish the one yer on now, you could think about this idea that Angle has thought up. Pythonesque and low-budget!

Antiochus Epiphanes
May 10th, 2004, 01:38 PM
At first I was disappointed at this seeming suckpoopery, but Mel is far more cagey than ever and in fact this may be his way of getting back at jews.

In a way, we might view ourselves like the Maccabees, fighting back against the imperial cosmopolitan empire and its false gods of ekwality, democracy and capitalism.

but when we win, the Temple will be our turf not the Jews. The Temple is the metaphor for the Realm of Spiritual ideas and the physical locus of the Highest Ideal. When Antiochus tried to Hellenize the Temple, that was the utter crime to the Jews. Antiochus was only eclipsed as a bad guy once Christianity won Constantine's favor and then Jesus took bad guy place number one. Today it's probably Hitler, then Jesus, but Jews celebrate killing Greeks and rebelling against Antiochus every year at Channukah so they arent likely to forget him.

Finally the film will be beneficial because it will educate Gentiles about the Jews which always works in our favor. They are mushrooms as Goebbels said and their are banished by light.

Angle
May 10th, 2004, 01:51 PM
I thought they hate Titus, who destroyed the Temple of Jerusalem in 70AD, thus causing the current Diaspora?

Anyone got any film experience/knowledge of the ins and outs of filmmaking. I used to be interested in directing - though I didn't pursue this farther than private reading - but I don't know much about editing or lighting, for example.

The time of the 'Blair Witch Project' of VNN White Nationalism is upon us!

Antiochus Epiphanes
May 10th, 2004, 04:36 PM
Well Titus was a biggie to eh? Yep. Of course the first Diaspora and Temple destruction was caused by the Babylonians. The act of Antiochus was particularly onerous though because instead of destroying the rebuilt temple, he sought to put a statute of Zeus in its place. That was more subversive to the Jew mentality, because it offered a greater vision of the transcendent ideal than their own tribal deity at that time. It lead to the assimilation of many jews and to jews, assimilation means extinction. Jesus was seen as a Hellenizer in the same light.