The Final Solution
May 10th, 2004, 06:14 PM
The Fall of Ancient Rome
http://www.faem.com/western/fallrome.htm
by ROGER PEARSON
What causes the fall of civilization? Some people have advanced
cyclical
theories, which have no substance in causal fact. Since Darwin,
however, Race
Scientists have taken the view that the most common cause of the
decline of a
civilization is a change in the biological character of the people.
Thus,
race-mixing, especially when the mixture is with a race of different or
inferior
ability, can and almost invariably does, bring about the downfall of
civilizations.
Here Roger Pearson follows the analysis of Professor Hans F. K.
Gunther, to
show how a racial change accompanied, or more properly, preceded, the
decline
of Imperial Rome. This article is an extract from the paperback
entitled Early
Nordic Civilizations, now published by Noontide Press.
Anthropological and archaeological research reveals that during the
Neolithic
period Northwest Europe shared a common culture with distinct and
characteristic forms which corresponded to a definite racial type.
Southern Scandinavia
and northwestern Germany appear to reveal the earliest traces of this
culture,
while the oldest Nordic remains in central and southern Germany, and in
the
British Isles, show that these countries were settled by Nordic peoples
at a
somewhat later date.
Unfortunately the record of the earliest period of out-going migration
from
this area is difficult to follow, since for a period of time the
practice of
body-burning prevailed, and the old saga of Beowulf tells us that the
corpse of
this great English hero was burned and not buried; but archaeology
makes it
possible for us to trace the Nordic migrations, even during the
body-burning
period, by the styles of building, ornament and technology which were
left for us
in the soil as Nordic culture spread throughout Europe. We can now see
the
Early Nordic peoples of the Neolithic Age moving steadily southwards in
a broad
stream from central and south Germany to the Balkans. With them goes
the
rectangular house, and the journey is traced in heavy panoply:
strongholds mark its
way. The word now is not merely peaceful penetration but conquest. So
it is
that Troy, on the Hellespont, is reached by them; so Mycenae and Tiryns
are
reached through Thessaly and Boeotia.... Into Italy the Italic-Nordic
streams
came first along the road from Valona into the Po and Tiber country.
Only much
later, in the Hallstatt period, however, did Nordic nations enter into
Britain,
France and Spain in the west. But in these movements, all alike
starting from
the same center, we behold our continent becoming Indo-European.
The Nordic Folkwandering
The Nordic tribes that took part in this early folk-wandering were
many. The
Nordic Phrygians went to Troy and Asia Minor; their close relatives the
Keltic-type Nordic Hellenes to Greece; the Nordic Italics (Italians or
Romans) to
Italy; the Nordic Kelts to France and Spain. To all these lands they
brought
their Indo-European languages (for Latin and Greek were also
Indo-European
tongues) and established themselves as a ruling class, usually over a
numerically
superior Mediterranean or Slav people.
Thus the builders of ancient Rome were the Nordic-Italic tribes which
gave
Italy its name, and as long ago as 2000 B.C. pile lake-dwellings in
upper Italy
show that a migration from north of the Alps had taken place. The
immigrants
burned their dead, and the pottery and burnings both point to a Nordic
background. The lake-villages were laid out in regular patterns,
similar to the later
Roma quadrata, and there were apparently rituals connected with the
bridges
which led from the land to the villages, which are perhaps reflected in
the
title of "pontifex" for the chief priest in Rome.
The main Italian migration which led to the foundation of Rome,
however, came
later during the Bronze Age. The pottery again shows that central
Germany
must have been the original home of these people, and the Latin
language, which
is closely akin to the Keltic group, is also Indo-European. The
Italians appear
to have entered Italy over the Eastern Alps from Austria, and then
moved down
the centre of Italy, skirting the firmly entrenched Etruscan state.
Relatively few in number, they were organized on a simple and stern
warriors code, and
the Latins appear in many ways to have been more Nordic than the
Hellenes,
certainly in their greater earnestness, the Roman gravitas and virtus,
and the
greater freedom for women.
The earliest Italian records tell of the legendary wars with the
Etruscans,
when Horatio kept the bridge, and saved Rome, and also of the slow
extension of
nationhood between the various Italic tribes, the Umbrians, Oscians,
Sabellans and Sabines. We hear of the Oscian love of fighting, and the
truthfulness
and feminine chastity of the Sabines. The oldest constitution reveals a
class
system based on race: the 300 Patricians who make up the Roman Senate
represent
the 300 families of the Latine and Sabine tribe of the Nordic
conquerors,
whereas the Plebeians correspond to the subject Mediterranean-Alpine
population,
with Dinaric and Hither Asiatic elements, and the descendants of the
Ligurian-Iberians. Marriage customs are different in the two groups,
and although the
Plebeians appear to some extent to have retained mother-rights in
inheritance,
the Nordics adhere to paternal lineage. The fair Romans had the
proverb, quoted
by Horace (Sat., i. 4, 85): :hic niger es; hunc tu, Romane, caveto; He
is
black, beware of him, Roman.
The oldest element in Roman Law is the Twelve Tables, and in this we
find
provision for the killing of misshapen children. The later Roman Laws
strove
also, without forgetting the eugenic ideal, to raise the number of
children. Even
then Seneca wrote, "We drown the weaklings and misshapen. It is not
unreason
but reason to separate the fit from the unfit." But before that, in 445
B.C.,
the first element of decay had already appeared, when the law, the Lex
Canuleia
de Connubio permitted marriages between Patricians and Plebeians. Until
this
law the children of mixed descent went always to the Plebeian stock,
thus
tending if anything to spread Nordic blood amongst the Plebeians. This
was the
pars deterior, or the "worse hand" as old German laws called it. Now,
instead,
the blood of the Plebeians was to mingle with the Nordic upper classes.
This was
the first step in the downfall of Rome, sure to bring evil even though
its
effects were slow.
Patrician Losses
The history of the Roman constitution pictures the change in racial
stratification of the Roman population, as power passes steadily into
the hands of the
Plebeians. The wars with the Nordic Kelts were borne by the Nordic
Patricians
the most. From the Patrician class came the soldiers and the
administrators of
the conquered territories. Cato (d. 109 B.C.) was the type of true
Roman,
born from the high nobility, with lofty aims, a complete patriot, a
statesman and
a general. According to Plutarch and a satirical poem he was
fair-haired and
light-eyed. But in his time Nordic blood was already running thinner.
The old
Roman names are still chosen -- Fulvius, Flavus, Rufus and others
denoting
coloring, and of two kinsmen one is called Niger (the dark) and the
other Rufus
(the fair) to discriminate between identical names. But after the Punic
Wars
all the old Patrician families were said to have vanished, but for a
dozen or
so.
More...
http://www.faem.com/western/fallrome.htm
by ROGER PEARSON
What causes the fall of civilization? Some people have advanced
cyclical
theories, which have no substance in causal fact. Since Darwin,
however, Race
Scientists have taken the view that the most common cause of the
decline of a
civilization is a change in the biological character of the people.
Thus,
race-mixing, especially when the mixture is with a race of different or
inferior
ability, can and almost invariably does, bring about the downfall of
civilizations.
Here Roger Pearson follows the analysis of Professor Hans F. K.
Gunther, to
show how a racial change accompanied, or more properly, preceded, the
decline
of Imperial Rome. This article is an extract from the paperback
entitled Early
Nordic Civilizations, now published by Noontide Press.
Anthropological and archaeological research reveals that during the
Neolithic
period Northwest Europe shared a common culture with distinct and
characteristic forms which corresponded to a definite racial type.
Southern Scandinavia
and northwestern Germany appear to reveal the earliest traces of this
culture,
while the oldest Nordic remains in central and southern Germany, and in
the
British Isles, show that these countries were settled by Nordic peoples
at a
somewhat later date.
Unfortunately the record of the earliest period of out-going migration
from
this area is difficult to follow, since for a period of time the
practice of
body-burning prevailed, and the old saga of Beowulf tells us that the
corpse of
this great English hero was burned and not buried; but archaeology
makes it
possible for us to trace the Nordic migrations, even during the
body-burning
period, by the styles of building, ornament and technology which were
left for us
in the soil as Nordic culture spread throughout Europe. We can now see
the
Early Nordic peoples of the Neolithic Age moving steadily southwards in
a broad
stream from central and south Germany to the Balkans. With them goes
the
rectangular house, and the journey is traced in heavy panoply:
strongholds mark its
way. The word now is not merely peaceful penetration but conquest. So
it is
that Troy, on the Hellespont, is reached by them; so Mycenae and Tiryns
are
reached through Thessaly and Boeotia.... Into Italy the Italic-Nordic
streams
came first along the road from Valona into the Po and Tiber country.
Only much
later, in the Hallstatt period, however, did Nordic nations enter into
Britain,
France and Spain in the west. But in these movements, all alike
starting from
the same center, we behold our continent becoming Indo-European.
The Nordic Folkwandering
The Nordic tribes that took part in this early folk-wandering were
many. The
Nordic Phrygians went to Troy and Asia Minor; their close relatives the
Keltic-type Nordic Hellenes to Greece; the Nordic Italics (Italians or
Romans) to
Italy; the Nordic Kelts to France and Spain. To all these lands they
brought
their Indo-European languages (for Latin and Greek were also
Indo-European
tongues) and established themselves as a ruling class, usually over a
numerically
superior Mediterranean or Slav people.
Thus the builders of ancient Rome were the Nordic-Italic tribes which
gave
Italy its name, and as long ago as 2000 B.C. pile lake-dwellings in
upper Italy
show that a migration from north of the Alps had taken place. The
immigrants
burned their dead, and the pottery and burnings both point to a Nordic
background. The lake-villages were laid out in regular patterns,
similar to the later
Roma quadrata, and there were apparently rituals connected with the
bridges
which led from the land to the villages, which are perhaps reflected in
the
title of "pontifex" for the chief priest in Rome.
The main Italian migration which led to the foundation of Rome,
however, came
later during the Bronze Age. The pottery again shows that central
Germany
must have been the original home of these people, and the Latin
language, which
is closely akin to the Keltic group, is also Indo-European. The
Italians appear
to have entered Italy over the Eastern Alps from Austria, and then
moved down
the centre of Italy, skirting the firmly entrenched Etruscan state.
Relatively few in number, they were organized on a simple and stern
warriors code, and
the Latins appear in many ways to have been more Nordic than the
Hellenes,
certainly in their greater earnestness, the Roman gravitas and virtus,
and the
greater freedom for women.
The earliest Italian records tell of the legendary wars with the
Etruscans,
when Horatio kept the bridge, and saved Rome, and also of the slow
extension of
nationhood between the various Italic tribes, the Umbrians, Oscians,
Sabellans and Sabines. We hear of the Oscian love of fighting, and the
truthfulness
and feminine chastity of the Sabines. The oldest constitution reveals a
class
system based on race: the 300 Patricians who make up the Roman Senate
represent
the 300 families of the Latine and Sabine tribe of the Nordic
conquerors,
whereas the Plebeians correspond to the subject Mediterranean-Alpine
population,
with Dinaric and Hither Asiatic elements, and the descendants of the
Ligurian-Iberians. Marriage customs are different in the two groups,
and although the
Plebeians appear to some extent to have retained mother-rights in
inheritance,
the Nordics adhere to paternal lineage. The fair Romans had the
proverb, quoted
by Horace (Sat., i. 4, 85): :hic niger es; hunc tu, Romane, caveto; He
is
black, beware of him, Roman.
The oldest element in Roman Law is the Twelve Tables, and in this we
find
provision for the killing of misshapen children. The later Roman Laws
strove
also, without forgetting the eugenic ideal, to raise the number of
children. Even
then Seneca wrote, "We drown the weaklings and misshapen. It is not
unreason
but reason to separate the fit from the unfit." But before that, in 445
B.C.,
the first element of decay had already appeared, when the law, the Lex
Canuleia
de Connubio permitted marriages between Patricians and Plebeians. Until
this
law the children of mixed descent went always to the Plebeian stock,
thus
tending if anything to spread Nordic blood amongst the Plebeians. This
was the
pars deterior, or the "worse hand" as old German laws called it. Now,
instead,
the blood of the Plebeians was to mingle with the Nordic upper classes.
This was
the first step in the downfall of Rome, sure to bring evil even though
its
effects were slow.
Patrician Losses
The history of the Roman constitution pictures the change in racial
stratification of the Roman population, as power passes steadily into
the hands of the
Plebeians. The wars with the Nordic Kelts were borne by the Nordic
Patricians
the most. From the Patrician class came the soldiers and the
administrators of
the conquered territories. Cato (d. 109 B.C.) was the type of true
Roman,
born from the high nobility, with lofty aims, a complete patriot, a
statesman and
a general. According to Plutarch and a satirical poem he was
fair-haired and
light-eyed. But in his time Nordic blood was already running thinner.
The old
Roman names are still chosen -- Fulvius, Flavus, Rufus and others
denoting
coloring, and of two kinsmen one is called Niger (the dark) and the
other Rufus
(the fair) to discriminate between identical names. But after the Punic
Wars
all the old Patrician families were said to have vanished, but for a
dozen or
so.
More...