What were the best fights on VNN in the last year?

What were the best fights on VNN in the last year?

Doppelhagen vs. Glex was a good one!

Just ask the father of deconstructionism, jew Noam Chomsky.
You mean Jacques Derrida, right?

I was once a naive lad who thought one could go to college and learn to make art like the dead, white, males of yore. Ouch, did I ever get disabused of that notion! To get the degree you must convince those in power that you have absorbed and internalized all the upside-down, good is bad, dogma of jew-art. Stories from grads of shamanistic encounters with Rothko's spirit after hours of gazing at one of his empty canvases abound.
It's very like a prank initiation I remember from boyscouts, the Order of Siam. Inductees prostrate themselves in the dust and salaam repeatedly while chanting the names of the three daughters of the king; Owah, Tagoo, and Siam. A message comes to the initiate after repeated chants at increasing tempo; "Oh, what a goose I am."
The enlightment gets you off the ground and into the "club" and the inductees into jewish, nonobjective, modernism know that their paycheck and reputation depend upon them continuing to support and indulge in the bunkum.


Deconstructionism, Dadaism, Cubism, ever notice how all these art "movements" are just standard lowering Scheisskultur? And how the political "isms", Communism, Feminism, Student Radicalism were really just vehicles for turning people against each other?

No need to mention who's behind all this, HMMMMMMM?

I guess you're right about jew Derrida passing the torch to jew Chomsky.
Well, they're actually very, very different: for one thing, Chomsky's not actually a 'deconstructionist'.

Do I really care, e.g., whether jew Tristan Tzara is the "legitimate" founder of Dadaism, as opposed to Alfred Jarry: "Ubu Roi"?
Bullshit! I can't remember ever being taught, or ever reading anywhere, that Tzara founded Dada 'as opposed to Jarry'... not once.

Like precipitously sub-genius Einstein got the credit for efforts by Aryans Morley, Michelson, Planck, et al..
All science is built upon the work of one's precedessors.

Einstein is more prominent in the 'public eye' than his precedessors, sure, but who really cares? Those who know better, know better... and they're the ones whose opinion you should care about.

Deconstructionism, Dadaism, Cubism, ever notice how all these art "movements" are just standard lowering Scheisskultur?
In what sense are you using the term 'deconstructionism'? Do you even have an idea of what the term specifically refers to?

As for Dada, at least, it contributed very, very much to Futurism and early Italian Fascist philosophy, so you can be happy about that much at least.

And how the political "isms", Communism, Feminism, Student Radicalism were really just vehicles for turning people against each other?
You can find a hell of a lot of feminist thought and figures in Western societies, that were around well before any Jewish influence... the claim that Feminism was originated and given its ideological momentum by predominantly Jewish thinkers is, again, complete bullshit.

It was given a lot of force by the changing labour force during World War 2 and in the post-war period (especially the 60's), that much is true, but the foundations were all there well before any attributable Jewish influence was present.

All in all... it kinda sounds like you've picked a bunch of names from some web-pages and now are trying to pass yourself off as being at all familiar with the things you're talking about (when you're so evidently not)- not that I should have expected any better, but still.

In what sense are you using the term 'deconstructionism'? Do you even have an idea of what the term specifically refers to?I do, though I'm proud to say not in any detail, because it's not worthy of study (unless you are Jewish). Another good name for it is Tikkun Olum. A way to tear up the world and what the White man has built and reconstruct it closer to the Jew hearts' desire. It's crap.
In visual arts it has resulted in ill-informed students reducing the beauty that was built by dead, White, males into meaningless pieces and reforming those shards into an ugly joke. Breaking up valid constructs of Western thought, then sampling, borrowing, and stealing elements into new combinations that have no content or soul.
You should read Tom Wolfe's The Painted Word and From Bauhaus to Our House. He "deconstructs" modernism nicely and reveals it for the crap it is. Art professors hate those books to a man. The books are said to be antisemitic, though no Jew is mentioned as such.

As for Dada, at least, it contributed very, very much to Futurism and early Italian Fascist philosophy, so you can be happy about that much at least.Bah!

Mark Twain, circa 1800's wrote about jew influence in America.

Ben Franklin, circa 1700's warned about jew influence in the New World.

Martin Luther, circa 1500's railed against jew influence in the European churches.

King of England, circa 1000's imported large numbers of jews to become tax collectors, accountants and magistrates. Such jews would be the founders of what we call English common law in all our Talmudic courts today.
Your point? Were they talking about feminism specifically? Because, as I recall, that's all my comment pertained to.

I do, though I'm proud to say not in any detail, because it's not worthy of study (unless you are Jewish).
Well, then. If you don't know what a term means, DON'T FUCKING PRETEND LIKE YOU DO!

That has to be the best use of "Bah!" ever! Scheisskultur Dadaism inspired Marinetti and the Futurists/proto Fascists? Bah, indeed!
That's going to be your only reply to that, is it? Bah?

Pfft.

That's it, other than FUCK YOU, JEW!
No, wait...this too; take your decadent jewish theorizing and theorize away in ever tightening gyres of illogic until you, like your theory, disappear up your own fundamental aperture.



That's going to be your only reply to that, is it? Bah?

Pfft.[/QUOTE]

This academician with the elaborately German moniker clearly took his Kike professors seriously and seems to believe he owns something of value in the trash they put in his head.
My best and most honest instructors told me that I would need to unlearn everything I learned in college. They were correct.

Rocky Graziano vs Tony Zale II 1947


Palookastone

Graziano was over rated..Zale was a little better but got wacked by Billy Conn and Marcel Cerdan.

Zale and Cerdan
http://www.avon.k12.in.us/All-Stars/as_sharp/717396_wm.jpg

Graziano and Zale would stand no chance against Jake La Motta who beat the guy who beat Zale(Cerdan).
Lamotta and Cerdan
http://www.geocities.com/mitri_1950/mitrinuova11.jpg

La motta and the "great" sugar Ray Robinson
http://www.onlinesports.com/images/ssg-jl-16a.jpg

OK. Don't pretend that these jew art movements are culture.
Whatever, don't pretend you want to do anything about these things you find so repulsive, if you're so obviously content to know fuck all about them... besides whinging, that is. I must admit, you do whinge and moan rather well.

Quite obviously, you have never so much as read a single Futurist play or poem, if you think the Dadaists never had an influence on Marinetti and his coterie. That's not 'theorising', that's a simple matter of knowing what I'm talking about, rather than reciting 'jew, jew, jew' like a trained parrot.

As far as this goes, you're the one who's 'theorising', given that you clearly were and clearly are talking right out of your arse.

Einz looks somewhat Sicilian if his SF avatar is him.
I get that a lot.

(Well, my current avatar obviously is not me- guess who it is?- but the one I had for a long time before the current one was me, yes.

My folks were both born in Lombardy, but in reality I'm a Italo-mongrel, a mix of different regional ethnicities.

And no, since it's been mentioned, not a single Jew in my family tree, either, not as one of the branches or hanging from the branches, either.)

This academician with the elaborately German moniker clearly took his Kike professors seriously and seems to believe he owns something of value in the trash they put in his head.
I'm no longer an 'academician'. It's a good term to apply to one's enemies, though.

I also never had any Jewish instructors at uni. Well, one, for a little while, but that was for (modern) Russian History. And you know what? She never once taught us anything about pogroms, Stalin's deportation of the refuseniks, etc... it was all Solzhenitsyn, Averchenko (look him up, he's ridiculously funny), Krotkov, Limonov, folks like that. Really.

(Quite fortuitous, seeing as though I was a fan of all of these guys before I started the course.)

As far as what I wanted to and did learn at uni, it was all writing essays properly, researching, using libraries and archives, stuff like that... I was never inclined to let the syllabus decide what I wanted to learn, and I never did.

Unlike others I could mention but won't, in the interests of being tactful, I don't need others to feed me my opinions and interests...

Tell me how Duchamp's absurdly Jewish ready-made urinal has anything to do with Umberto Boccione's Unique Forms of Continuity in Space? Time-frame of creation? That's about it.
Dada was the first anti-art, the first to make fun of the Western aesthetic. They were mostly Jews like you very likely are.

You state that you are no longer an academician.You certainly bring the attitude of one to this forum. No matter. I, too, have a rotten attitude.
You left out the part of my post about unlearning, clearing your head of the filth they put in it. If you had a syllabus that required the reading of Derrida or any of his ilk then you got jew-screwed in school. If you devoted study to such tripe as Dada, deconstructionism, post-modernism, the aleatory process of art, semiotics, and other Jewish poison then you wasted time on trash. Time that could have been spent in study of real thinkers and artists. You'll get little respect here for your scholarly knowlege if that was your emphasis, at least not from me. I've had all the contact with it that I desire, as little as possible.

Some Dada "Art". Isn't it bold and brilliant? Truly inspirational. No kidding, many a Jew was inspired to emulate this con artist and made a fortune. Many a page of theory was written. Eighty-seven years of Jewish degeneracy have followed. School after schul of new movements, each stupider than the last.
Ach, I could go on and on...
http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/d/images/dchmp_fntn_th.gif





http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/Images/arrows/left_arrow.red.GIFMarcel Duchamp, Fountain (http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/d/images/dchmp_fntn_low.gif), 1917, white glazed ceramic plumbing fixture and painted signature, readymade (http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/r/readymade.html) porcelain (http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/p/porcelain.html) urinal on its back, 63 x 48 x 35 cm. The urinal, purchased from "Mott Works" company in New York and signed "R. Mutt," was submitted to the jury-free 1917 Independents exhibition (http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/En.html#anchor2349526) but was suppressed by the hanging committee. This is a photograph of either the second version of 1951 or the third of 1964. The Georges Pompidou Centre in Paris publishes a color photo (http://www.centrepompidou.fr/images/oeuvres/XL/3I01505.jpg) of it. See anti-art (http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/An.html#anchor1175368).

Oh yes, the sum total of all Dadaist art, visual or otherwise, is Fountain.

Oh yes, the sum total of all Futurist art is Boccione's work...

You left out the part of my post about unlearning, clearing your head of the filth they put in it. If you had a syllabus that required the reading of Derrida or any of his ilk then you got jew-screwed in school. If you devoted study to such tripe as Dada, deconstructionism, post-modernism, the aleatory process of art, semiotics, and other Jewish poison then you wasted time on trash. Time that could have been spent in study of real thinkers and artists. You'll get little respect here for your scholarly knowlege if that was your emphasis, at least not from me. I've had all the contact with it that I desire, as little as possible.
What scholarly 'knowledge'? It doesn't take 'scholarly knowledge' to see that you're quite clearly full of shit. Your idea of 'learning' seems to be being proud of what you don't know, as opposed to what you do (about anything at all, really), so why the hell would I take study hints from you?

You cannot attack something properly unless you know what you're talking about. (Why do you think 'Orientalism' was such a booming field in Britain's universities during Britain's colonial time- because all the people involved in it wanted to become Oriental? Or because they had a greater regard for Oriental culture than their own?) Flaunting one's ignorance, contrary to what you seem to think, only serves to convince people that you're ignorant and don't know what you're talking about.

One more thing: what do you know about what I studied or what I do study? You know precisely what you seem to know about anything else, jack shit... so don't presume.

[
QUOTE=einzelwesen]Oh yes, the sum total of all Dadaist art, visual or otherwise, is Fountain.

Oh yes, the sum total of all Futurist art is Boccione's work...

Oh, yes, just answer the question, how is Dada important to the developement of futurism?
What scholarly 'knowledge'? It doesn't take 'scholarly knowledge' to see that you're quite clearly full of shit. Your idea of 'learning' seems to be being proud of what you don't know, as opposed to what you do (about anything at all, really), so why the hell would I take study hints from you?And you, I presume are full of sweet stuff? Like kike-learning?

You cannot attack something properly unless you know what you're talking about. (Why do you think 'Orientalism' was such a booming field in Britain's universities during Britain's colonial time- because all the people involved in it wanted to become Oriental? Or because they had a greater regard for Oriental culture than their own?) Flaunting one's ignorance, contrary to what you seem to think, only serves to convince people that you're ignorant and don't know what you're talking about.I'd like to hear more about how the colonial British had a higher regard for Oriental culture than their own. You, alone, have divined that knowlege.


One more thing: what do you know about what I studied or what I do study? You know precisely what you seem to know about anything else, jack shit... so don't presume.[/QUOTE]Presumptuous hypocrite, natter on but try to make better sense and answer my question without the cheap ad hominums.

How was the creation of first image dependent (as you state) upon the Schul that was responsible for the second image?
http://www.thais.it/scultura/image/media/sch00287.jpg (http://www.thais.it/scultura/image/sch00287.htm)

http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/d/images/dchmp_fntn_th.gif

The study of Jew art and Jew philosophy is,to me , the most suffocatingly boring subject imaginable. You know that you were full of crap to say that Dada was very, very important to the developement of Italian Futurism. I cannot see how you can defend that without spinning yourself even sillier than you are.
I suggest you go back to your Derrida and console yourself that you are very, very learned on that vacuous subject. Good luck in finding the respect that you so think you deserve. Good luck even finding somebody outside Academia Judaica who is interested in the subject.
Yer just a chump in my book.
You didn't get the job as teaching adjunct, did you?

I would add this choice:

Diablonegro vs White people.

To be technical, Dada was "supposed" to destroy art. By somehow making art. Whoever called it scheisskultur made a very accurate observation. Dada is garbage, much like the bulk of postmodern art.

Duchamp wasn't the first con-artist(get it?), but he did set the standards for modern art bullshit. It seems to run on the naked Emporer principle. Do something, and the lemmings, for fear of being left out from this new wave, will not point out it is shit, but instead will fawn over it so they can be trendy.

This is why I do not associate with "artists" anymore.

Personally, I'm a Bruegal fan, his depictions of Europes common folk caught a facet of life often ignored there, American artists such as Cole and Hopper did great scenes, Cole wilderness, Hopper urban.

My favorite Expressionist painter has always been Edvard Munch. You should read his thoughts on his work, The Scream.

There's a breath of fresh air! We've been worshipping naked Emperors for a century, no doubt about it; some more than others, read: einzel.

Bruegal was a great artist. Cole and Hopper were at least very, very good in their milieu.

I've heard of this kind of SFer, the pretentious "erudite" kind. We usually get the short bus crowd from SF here. Change is good. You know, einzel, while researching I've read a few cached posts from SF on cultural matters--and they were quite good--what you're doing here is "deconstructing" all of that. Never saw your name among those prominent cultural posters over there, BTW. Trying to make a name for yourself here? Momus is giving you sage advice, truly we are all benefitting from his experience, but you are too obtuse to even admit that he might be right.


LOL.....until I had read this more carefully I thought you were referring to me, and calling me an SFer is a bit of an insult. Now I see you are largely responding to Einzel via what I said, that kind of threw me off for a second.

My observations stem from growing up in Jew York, where gentile trend-whores will latch to whatever they can until they or society gets bored and moves on. Then the jewish media bosses have something new for them to pat themselve son the back for being oh so sophisticated and spend their money on. Oy vey, it's like a parade of the willing ignorant. I think Linder mentioned these people when he described the typical college kid counter-protesting him. They think they are smart, but in reality are of very low intelligence.

Back to the subject at hand...which was about forum fights, but now art(sub-subject at hand?)....

Personally, I still greatly enjoy art...the real stuff, and try to hit the Met at least twice a year(anyone else catch the exhibit on lost Italian manuscript paintings? Yes, I'm a nerd.). I also recommend visiting the Whitney Museum of American Art....alot of egghead types like the Guggenheim, but that place seems like it was designed to be sterile and boring.

I'm glad to know you've even heard of Bruegal, and I agree with your understanding of Cole and Hopper....one may not like Hoppers choice, that is, painting NYC landscapes, but the technical skill involved in really good-they look almost like photographs.

Julius Evola was a futurist-Dada type painter in the 20s after the war before he started writing. Salvador Dali was associated with Franco and the rebels and the phalange.

I have been to the Prado and there I saw many wonderful paintings by Velasquez and others. One that I have always remembered was of a Jew weighing gold in scales. You could see his big hook nose. His face was sort of illuminated by the gold, maybe by a candle on the table which I cant recall if it was in the picture or not. It sort of reminded me of some Rembrandts I have seen like maybe the one of the Merchant's guild, where the faces are illuminated by a light source on a table.

I think the title of the painting was "Jew counting money" or such like. Somebody could check the catalog of the Prado to test my memory.

I had to go with the first one, but the last one is a close second.

That DB, you can always rely on him to jump into the fray at a moment's notice.

ahem...Diabloblanco92 is not white, I repeat not white! :)

2TN running for cover from impending DB post barrage. :D

Probably the funniest:
Screwface vs. I Farted In Your Mouth
Jim vs. Georgie

Better known as a genocidal fool when the vital resources of the rarist and best people are plundered by the most common and populous brown populations, with Einz playing the ardent supporter of this type of communism, if this is indeed the case.
No. Basically, I'm a communitarian- meaning that people should organise themselves in smallish communities according to their own wishes. I'm not in the habit of telling people what they should believe or do believe, unlike yourselves.

Salvador Dali was associated with Franco and the rebels and the phalange.
Dali, and let's not make any bones about it, was a whore- although an excellent painter in his prime, of course. He had no loyalty to anyone except himself, and the only people he associated with to any extent were the 'fashionable people', the people in positions of social power in a nation.

And when the war came to Europe, he promptly fucked off to America and stayed there. A real man to emulate...

There's a breath of fresh air!
FYI, I don't love or even remotely like most 'modern art'. My favourite painters are William Blake, Francisco Goya, and an American called Ralph Blakelock.

No, I'm not in love with the modern world, either, nor do I like it much.

No. Basically, I'm a communitarian- meaning that people should organise themselves in smallish communities according to their own wishes. I'm not in the habit of telling people what they should believe or do believe, unlike yourselves.

.
Sounds great, so what's the problem? shouldn't those who think jewish art, academics, media, and banking are horrible be able to "organize in smallish communities" where the ever present jewish influence isn't there "telling people what they should or do believe" Pull the dradel out of your ears noes and throat you mongolian, shitskin, creep.

Sounds great, so what's the problem? shouldn't those who think jewish art, academics, media, and banking are horrible be able to "organize in smallish communities" where the ever present jewish influence isn't there "telling people what they should or do believe"
Why is the above such a problem; because you have no alternatives to offer people of your own?

No, the past isn't enough. (The Renaissance, for instance, was based on the ideas of the Classical era- but it wasn't the Classical era, and it went far beyond the classical era's ideas and forms.)

No, blaming everything on jews isn't enough, though you seem to think it's sufficient to bring people around.

Pull the dradel out of your ears noes and throat you mongolian, shitskin, creep.
You really are a fuckwit, aren't you?

Commendable. Sort of a micro-nationalist? I am too, but organized as technically advanced city states separated by vast wilderness
Cities of the scope we have today are clearly un-natural; they divorce people from nature and from each other.

You're telling people what to believe.
I tell people what I believe, if belief is what's being discussed (well, mostly). Believe what you want...

La Motta was a frickin' animal. Although Robinson beat him 5 out of 6, LaMotta wouldn't go down.

Speaking of Billy Conn---

Billy's boyhood idol:

http://www.harrygreb.com/grebspitinface.jpg

Harry Greb. (Being cooled down) Another Pittsburgh boy.

Greb beat Gene Tunney in 1922 with one eye. He fought for 5 years with one retina detached. All comers.

White folk were MUCH tougher in those days.


Pittsburghstone!

Actually Greb was a jewboy but I still give the guy credit for being one of the greats!

By the way Tunney lost the first one to Greb and won the next 3!

http://www.harrygreb.com/magsnineties.html

"Yeah, that Greb, he was some fighter. You know he was born comin' out of a corner? No, it's true. he was born in a streetcar on the corner of dauphin and Fitch Streets, Pittsburgh, 1894. They reckon his real name was Berg, you know, but he didn't reckon to make much money with a jewish name, so he just reversed the name, from B-E-R-G, to G-R-E-B. Jeez, this guy could fight. You know, Greb would fight anywhere, anytime and anyone. I hear tell that in 1919 he fought more than 40 times, against contenders and champions, and because he didn't have such a great punch he had to go the full distance nearly every time. Just think, that's almost 500 rounds in just one year. He'd fight fifteen rounds one day, and two day's later fight fifteen rounds again."

Greb wasn't Jewish, and no, his name wasn't "Berg" backwards.

From the same article:

The story concerning Greb's name-change has persisted through the years but is entirely fictional--the fighter's birth certificate, produced by Engel in 1954, proves that he was christened Edward Henry Greb.
And from the third article on the same page:

Again, contrary to legend, his name was not Berg spelled backwards, as many people thought. He was of German-Irish ancestry and grew up in the strict, respectable household of his father, Pius Greb.
Now, aren't you relieved???

That tells me that it was the kikes who started the rumor that he was Jewish. Like with Columbus, Mark Twain, etc. the self-aggrandizing liars will try to accrue merit for their Tribe that they don't deserve through deception and theft.

You're probably all of the above, except for Georgie.
I deny ever having punished anyone by filling their oral cavity with gasses derived through digestion and transmitted to the victim by way of sphincteral transmission, thus altering the quality of breath either for the better or for the worse.
I deny reception of phalluses into my face space for the purpose of receiving procreational fluids into any of the available orifices.
I deny ever having received footwear by the government either as gifts or through purchase as a result of subtle cohersion.
I deny ever having admired any Austrian born, German head of state who killed millions of my people, in case I'm Georgie

Greb wasn't Jewish, and no, his name wasn't "Berg" backwards.

From the same article:


And from the third article on the same page:


Now, aren't you relieved???

Heh, thanks einzel! I always heard Greb was jewish...looked for a link that said he was but didn't bother to read the whole article! Shame on me, kudos to you!

You're forgiven about the "Pittsburgh Windmill".

Don't even start in on Fritzie Zivic, the "Croat Comet". World Welterweight champ, 1940-1941.

http://www.clpgh.org/exhibit/images/gif/zivic1.gif


He's buried in St. Nick's Cemetery, Pittsburgh. Nary a jew in sight. ;)


Keystone

Fritzie Zivic, one of the dirtiest fighters in the history of boxing....also one of the best! Guy beat the great Henry Armstrong, twice!

Why does Pittsburgh produce so many outstanding fighters?

My favorite Expressionist painter has always been Edvard Munch. You should read his thoughts on his work, The Scream.

Got a link?

I deny ever having punished anyone by filling their oral cavity with gasses derived through digestion and transmitted to the victim by way of sphincteral transmission, thus altering the quality of breath either for the better or for the worse.
I deny reception of phalluses into my face space for the purpose of receiving procreational fluids into any of the available orifices.
I deny ever having received footwear by the government either as gifts or through purchase as a result of subtle cohersion.
I deny ever having admired any Austrian born, German head of state who killed millions of my people, in case I'm Georgie
I meant, supposing I were Georgie

I still can't fathom what you are trying to say. I think you should continue to deny most of those things no matter who you are.
What the hell are you getting at? It's too subtle for me, spell it out please.

I meant, supposing I were Georgie

Yeah, his dad was German and his mum was Irish... not an uncommon match back then, I think. I wonder why?

I still can't fathom what you are trying to say. I think you should continue to deny most of those things no matter who you are.
How many times should I continually deny most (not all?) of these things before everyone starts to believe me?

What the hell are you getting at? It's too subtle for me, spell it out please.
The footwear thing was written by Jim here:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=2181
Post #1
I'd have to look up the others to give you details

Here's the other brawl:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=10464#post10464
Post #18

So you were attempting to mimic one of Jim's in-character rambles? Is that it? Are you a sock-puppet of Jim? How many personae do you have on this forum? Be honest and claim your alter-egos.

How many times should I continually deny most (not all?) of these things before everyone starts to believe me?

The footwear thing was written by Jim here:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=2181
Post #1
I'd have to look up the others to give you details

So you were attempting to mimic one of Jim's in-character rambles? Is that it? Are you a sock-puppet of Jim? How many personae do you have on this forum? Be honest and claim your alter-egos.
You must have missed a posting. I was answering this:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=5250&page=6&pp=10
Post #51
as Doppelhaken suspected me of multiply existing as Jim, Screwface and "I farted in your mouth". If you read the reply, you may notice that I was denying existing as Jim and the other 2.
I used to be Nick Nolte until Georgie erased this charachter.
I'm presently KLM, Turk Hunter, Der Führer and J.Stiller&Anne_Mara

Well, you're honest about your sock puppets, quite a gaggle of you, you should organize yourselves. Why the desire for multiple characters?

You must have missed a posting. I was answering this:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=5250&page=6&pp=10
Post #51
as Doppelhaken suspected me of multiply existing as Jim, Screwface and "I farted in your mouth". If you read the reply, you may notice that I was denying existing as Jim and the other 2.
I used to be Nick Nolte until Georgie erased this charachter.
I'm presently KLM, Turk Hunter, Der Führer and J.Stiller&Anne_Mara

Well, you're honest about your sock puppets, quite a gaggle of you, you should organize yourselves. Why the desire for multiple characters?
For practicle purposes.
Der Führer was exclusively used to archive a photo series. Turk Hunter posted on the European Forum, Nick Nolte was a clown, J.Stiller &... were to replace Nick Nolte

I had to go with the first one, but the last one is a close second.

That DB, you can always rely on him to jump into the fray at a moment's notice.

ahem...Diabloblanco92 is not white, I repeat not white! :)

2TN running for cover from impending DB post barrage. :D

Hmmm Id ask you to explain your position but I pretty much already know.After all for you anyone who can walk in the sun for 5 minutes without getting boiled like a lobster is not White.
Such thingas as morphology, hair tyexture, biochemical differences etc,only "Jews" would suggest theuy have anything to do with your race.

diablo

Hmmm Id ask you to explain your position but I pretty much already know.After all for you anyone who can walk in the sun for 5 minutes without getting boiled like a lobster is not White.

Are you sure you're not creating a straw man against him? Even for people who cannot tan at all (and even large numbers of blondes tan very well) and instead burn, generally take a bit longer than five minutes to burn.

Such thingas as morphology, hair tyexture, biochemical differences etc,only "Jews" would suggest theuy have anything to do with your race.

Actually, the kikes are the biggest promoters of the myth that only light hair and eyes are acceptable, because that would serve to turn many perfectly White folks off to the pro-White, anti-kike cause.

Anyway, I assume you were being sarcastic in that sentence. Of course morphology counts for more than pigment, but someone who has black eyes and/or brownish skin probably has non-White ancestry, even if his morphology appears to be acceptable.

For the record, my hair and eyes are brown and green, respectively, placing me somewhat in the middle and thus "neutral" on the issue.

what about demonica's catfight going on in the "ranting over stromfront" thread right now with some snotty feminazi! She's smacking that beyotch all over the place! Man VNN has cool mods now.