Robert Bandanza
September 2nd, 2007, 08:17 AM
Of course, this is but a minor nuisance, as the neocons plan to kill Iranian toddlers and grandmothers no matter what the IAEA reports. In fact, lining up the American people in a neat row behind this plan will be a minor hurdle. Consider the ability of the corporate media to convince clueless Americans that Saddam and Osama collaborated in the attacks of September 11, 2001. So effective was this propaganda effort, a Hitlerian Big Lie repeated over and over, that to this day many Americans cannot tell the difference between Osama and Saddam, who were in fact arch enemies. Making the Iran nuke story stick will likewise be no problem.
“To actually say that if diplomacy fails the choice will be to accept a nuclear Iran or bomb Iran, this is a diplomatic blockbuster,” Francois Heisbourg, a special adviser to the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris, told the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/world/europe/28francecnd.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/S/Sciolino,%20Elaine). “Mr. Sarkozy stressed that such an outcome would be a disaster and did not say that France would ever participate in military action against Iran or even tacitly support such an approach. But the mere fact that he raised the specter of the use of force is likely to be perceived by Iran as a warning of the consequences of its continued course of action,” the newspaper adds. In other words, even though Iran is experiencing apparently insurmountable problems with its uranium enrichment program, designed for its energy needs, it will be required to grovel and plead, not that this will prevent the neocons from unleashing massive violence against its people. Iran, of course, will not grovel and plead, and the bombing and mass murder campaign is imminent.
http://adereview.com/blog/?p=20
“To actually say that if diplomacy fails the choice will be to accept a nuclear Iran or bomb Iran, this is a diplomatic blockbuster,” Francois Heisbourg, a special adviser to the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris, told the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/world/europe/28francecnd.html?n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/S/Sciolino,%20Elaine). “Mr. Sarkozy stressed that such an outcome would be a disaster and did not say that France would ever participate in military action against Iran or even tacitly support such an approach. But the mere fact that he raised the specter of the use of force is likely to be perceived by Iran as a warning of the consequences of its continued course of action,” the newspaper adds. In other words, even though Iran is experiencing apparently insurmountable problems with its uranium enrichment program, designed for its energy needs, it will be required to grovel and plead, not that this will prevent the neocons from unleashing massive violence against its people. Iran, of course, will not grovel and plead, and the bombing and mass murder campaign is imminent.
http://adereview.com/blog/?p=20