Tomasz Winnicki
September 3rd, 2007, 12:47 AM
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=53455
Hi everyone. This is my first update in quite sometime and I apologize for the delay.
I am in court this coming Friday August 31, 2007 at 9:30 at Kelowna courthouse with respect to the first date of trial on the drive without licence charge and seat belt charge.
I appreciate any show of support for those in the area who are able to attend.
The Crown is putting one officer on the stand on each charge. I have subponaed 2
ICBC officials (including one from Vancouver) to give evidence in relation to the drivers licence issues. I may require a third as the name of the Crown witness provided to me is brain dead and admittedly gets all her information from the " experts" she said in Victoria.
My defences are based on my constitutional right to the free use of the public highways.
The Crown has already violated one court order - they were ordered to give me the names of several ICBC and gov't officials who I could interview to see which one I should subpoena to give evidence on the nature and operation of drivers licences, insurance and registration.The Crown gave me 1 name of a clerk in Vancouver who knew only what she was told to know.
I will be exposing how ICBC has assigned a drivers licence number to me even though I have never had a BC drivers licence!!! Karen Heslop, the supervisor of the Kelowna ICBC office has already been subpoenaed and compelled to bring a print out of all computer screens with my name on it.
Also, Julie Moore, a clerk in Vancouver whose name the Crown provided, has also been subpoenaed and should be in court to give evidence on the nature and operation of drivers licences. My belief? I think she'll crack and admit that she knows nothing and show that the Crown lied to me. This should be interesting.
It is my intention to put a senior member of the RCMP on the stand to give evidence on the nature and operation of that force. No less than 3 other RCMP officers will also be on the stand. My original subpoena was denied because the judge felt that I did not provide evidence that he was likely to give material evidence on the stand. However, as was written in the book, RCMP v the People, the RCMP are so obscessed with secrecy it is unbelievable - they are, admittedly, a para-military police force. They have and continue to refuse to provide information about their history and workings of the force unless one agrees to submit their manuscript to the RCMP for editing prior to release! This shatters the myth about the RCMP being Canada's iconic police force.
Officers expected to appear on the stand, though likely not all on Friday, are Const. Waite (seat belt issue), Cons. Zanon (stole my car), Cons. Pebernat (assisted Zanon), Cpl Seversen (who assisted and authorized this) and Cons. Aselton (the infamous RCMP officer who used to write pro-cop propaganda in the local newspaper - does any major newspaper give the opportunity for someone in the freedom movement to present our side on a weekly basis!!!?????) All officers are local to Kelowna.
The Crown refuses to provide all officers notes or other information.
My factum on the RCMP is virtually done - 48 pages on the history, development and corruption (unconstitutionally) of this military police force in the provinces. I still require more information which I anticipate to have shortly.
Research has discovered that even the first PM, John Macdonald, conceded that there was no law which permitted a federal police force to operate in the provinces. So too did Laurier and many others. John Macdonald had to cancel plans to put the North West Mounted Police (forerunners to the RCMP) in Manitoba when it became a province in 1870.
Questions are being drafted for the witnesses as I write.
Congratulations to Dennis Dodds et al (about 6?) who are currently travelling around the Vancouver and Lower Mainland area without licence, registration or insurance!!!!!! Let's have more people on board - contact Dennis for more information and join in their present (and hopefully eventual) success!!!! They are showing that cooperating with each other on this issue can work. Keep in mind that this type of action still requires responsibility if accidents occur! All freedoms have responsibilities and duties - one cannot exist without the other.
ddodds@telus.net (ddodds@telus.net)
Remember there is only 1, count 'em 1, silver bullet to our freedom issues, including the root cause of banking,and that is civil disobedience to their corruption. Just say NO. They don't have the resources to deal with even a small percentage of us.
More updates on the Nelson Meikle s. 238 hearing will be forthcoming - we are anxiously anticipating some serious and precedent setting success here, especially on the issue of trespassing by CRA officials to make service of demand notices. It truly is incredible the power of a no trespassing sign (especially when direct to specific government officials and police). Next (and anticipated final date) will be in November.
It appears from evidence of Dwayne Sol of CRA, that there exists a "Memorandum of Understanding" between the Investigations department of CRA and Human Resources Canada, in relation to obtaining copies of applications for SIN's! Disclosure demands have been filed as well as FOI requests and we hope to release this information shortly.
My next hearing date on the s. 238 ITA charges I am disputing will probably be in January sometime. I have to file my written argument on personhood by the end of October and on November 30 we are required to set a date on this pivotal issue. Tracy Todd for CRA has already given her evidence.
A copy of my factum will be released publically when I am done and it is filed, as I will on the RCMP and theright to free travel.
Any donations to help with all of the incredible costs for these cases will be greatly appreciated.
Donations may be sent to Suite 700 101-1865 Dilworth Dr. Kelowna BC V1Y 9T1
Thank you for all your support. More updates to come throughout the fall.
in freedom I remain,
David-Kevin: Lindsay
The non-licensedman
Hi everyone. This is my first update in quite sometime and I apologize for the delay.
I am in court this coming Friday August 31, 2007 at 9:30 at Kelowna courthouse with respect to the first date of trial on the drive without licence charge and seat belt charge.
I appreciate any show of support for those in the area who are able to attend.
The Crown is putting one officer on the stand on each charge. I have subponaed 2
ICBC officials (including one from Vancouver) to give evidence in relation to the drivers licence issues. I may require a third as the name of the Crown witness provided to me is brain dead and admittedly gets all her information from the " experts" she said in Victoria.
My defences are based on my constitutional right to the free use of the public highways.
The Crown has already violated one court order - they were ordered to give me the names of several ICBC and gov't officials who I could interview to see which one I should subpoena to give evidence on the nature and operation of drivers licences, insurance and registration.The Crown gave me 1 name of a clerk in Vancouver who knew only what she was told to know.
I will be exposing how ICBC has assigned a drivers licence number to me even though I have never had a BC drivers licence!!! Karen Heslop, the supervisor of the Kelowna ICBC office has already been subpoenaed and compelled to bring a print out of all computer screens with my name on it.
Also, Julie Moore, a clerk in Vancouver whose name the Crown provided, has also been subpoenaed and should be in court to give evidence on the nature and operation of drivers licences. My belief? I think she'll crack and admit that she knows nothing and show that the Crown lied to me. This should be interesting.
It is my intention to put a senior member of the RCMP on the stand to give evidence on the nature and operation of that force. No less than 3 other RCMP officers will also be on the stand. My original subpoena was denied because the judge felt that I did not provide evidence that he was likely to give material evidence on the stand. However, as was written in the book, RCMP v the People, the RCMP are so obscessed with secrecy it is unbelievable - they are, admittedly, a para-military police force. They have and continue to refuse to provide information about their history and workings of the force unless one agrees to submit their manuscript to the RCMP for editing prior to release! This shatters the myth about the RCMP being Canada's iconic police force.
Officers expected to appear on the stand, though likely not all on Friday, are Const. Waite (seat belt issue), Cons. Zanon (stole my car), Cons. Pebernat (assisted Zanon), Cpl Seversen (who assisted and authorized this) and Cons. Aselton (the infamous RCMP officer who used to write pro-cop propaganda in the local newspaper - does any major newspaper give the opportunity for someone in the freedom movement to present our side on a weekly basis!!!?????) All officers are local to Kelowna.
The Crown refuses to provide all officers notes or other information.
My factum on the RCMP is virtually done - 48 pages on the history, development and corruption (unconstitutionally) of this military police force in the provinces. I still require more information which I anticipate to have shortly.
Research has discovered that even the first PM, John Macdonald, conceded that there was no law which permitted a federal police force to operate in the provinces. So too did Laurier and many others. John Macdonald had to cancel plans to put the North West Mounted Police (forerunners to the RCMP) in Manitoba when it became a province in 1870.
Questions are being drafted for the witnesses as I write.
Congratulations to Dennis Dodds et al (about 6?) who are currently travelling around the Vancouver and Lower Mainland area without licence, registration or insurance!!!!!! Let's have more people on board - contact Dennis for more information and join in their present (and hopefully eventual) success!!!! They are showing that cooperating with each other on this issue can work. Keep in mind that this type of action still requires responsibility if accidents occur! All freedoms have responsibilities and duties - one cannot exist without the other.
ddodds@telus.net (ddodds@telus.net)
Remember there is only 1, count 'em 1, silver bullet to our freedom issues, including the root cause of banking,and that is civil disobedience to their corruption. Just say NO. They don't have the resources to deal with even a small percentage of us.
More updates on the Nelson Meikle s. 238 hearing will be forthcoming - we are anxiously anticipating some serious and precedent setting success here, especially on the issue of trespassing by CRA officials to make service of demand notices. It truly is incredible the power of a no trespassing sign (especially when direct to specific government officials and police). Next (and anticipated final date) will be in November.
It appears from evidence of Dwayne Sol of CRA, that there exists a "Memorandum of Understanding" between the Investigations department of CRA and Human Resources Canada, in relation to obtaining copies of applications for SIN's! Disclosure demands have been filed as well as FOI requests and we hope to release this information shortly.
My next hearing date on the s. 238 ITA charges I am disputing will probably be in January sometime. I have to file my written argument on personhood by the end of October and on November 30 we are required to set a date on this pivotal issue. Tracy Todd for CRA has already given her evidence.
A copy of my factum will be released publically when I am done and it is filed, as I will on the RCMP and theright to free travel.
Any donations to help with all of the incredible costs for these cases will be greatly appreciated.
Donations may be sent to Suite 700 101-1865 Dilworth Dr. Kelowna BC V1Y 9T1
Thank you for all your support. More updates to come throughout the fall.
in freedom I remain,
David-Kevin: Lindsay
The non-licensedman