Even though "The New Orleans Protocol" was effected absent the presence of a BNP official able or willing to adopt the protocol, won't you, nonetheless, join me in emailing the BNP, and imploring them to publically underwrite the tenets of this historic agreement?

Thanking You Patriots of the VNNF in advance,
I shall remain, as ever always-

In Your Service,
Chain

http://www.bnp.org.uk/contact.html

http://www.bnp.org.uk/images/masthead.GIF

Question-
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1078037&postcount=6

Did John Tyndall sign the Protocol on behalf of the British National Party?
Answer-
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1078040&postcount=7









































[SIZE=7]Ram![/SIZE]
http://orbita.starmedia.com/~oportal/ghandi.jpg

http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Gandhi/gandhi.pics/g-death2.jpg

http://myhero.com/myhero/images/logoblack.jpg

Wanna take an afternoon delight nap now, my sexy little nubile niece?
http://www.wellesley.edu/Peace/Peace_justice_internships/ghandi.jpg

http://www.charmeck.org/NR/rdonlyres/e3rluellzqniqhw6jplh4bxbyfy3lvnjnjoofgfsjrr72f2bkhya4z32pp7vgzhc5f26mar4jzgx4pf7emmo5vf5jih/crc13.jpg

Chain, if you want me to email 'em, it's worthwhile, and I will; but I thought that Tyndall and Griffin had had one of those all-too-common "falling outs," and that the honorable Tyndall was head of the National Front party (who, unlike the BNP, did not admit jews or homosexuals)?

http://www.natfront.com/nf_faqs_1.html

Don Black allows us to get 'slagged off' all the time. In fact, I was
named YET AGAIN by BNP internet 'mouthpiece', Sharon Ebanks , by
actual name on SF, and they know we are not allowed on that board.
Pete Rushton was named as well.

Pete Rushton was beaten up by Griffinites at a IAN STUART MEMORIAL gig by top Griffinites.

I have been threatened and 'ICE' has been threatened, many times, by the Griffinites.

The below quote is a nonsense. I have heard Black bragging about
Stormfront when speaking at the Louisiana weekend. "We don't object
to ideological differences or disagreements over methods."

That is the very reason I was banned from Stormfront. For sticking up
for John Tyndall. I only argued on policy grounds. I received a 'crap' reply from Don Black re this episode. The guy is a liar.

Every time Black mentioned Stormfront, he thought he should have
applause.


I will post the 'Louisiana accord' next.......

The below assumes that we will all behave like Gentlemen and Ladies.

We have been infiltrated, so beware.

There is nothing wrong, and everything right, in the protocol. I have no wish to get involved in internal US nationalist politics . However, I note that the owner of this site, Mr.Linder, was 'banned' from attending the Conference in New Orleans. Just why, I have no idea. Perhaps someone could please explain.

Either way, Don Black has allowed, and continues to allow, his site to be involved in internal UK nationalist politics. And that is NOT right ! :mad:



The New Orleans Protocol, 29th May 2004
News/Comment; Posted on: 2004-06-02 19:44:22 [ Printer friendly ]

Gathering of White leaders yields historic agreement.

by Paul Fromm (pictured)

On Saturday, May 29, 2004, leaders of groups from three countries struck a historical agreement about future conduct in the post-September 11 era. The protocol was the initiative of former Louisiana State representative David Duke.

The protocol pledges adherents to a pan-European outlook, recognizing national and ethnic allegiance, but stressing the value of all European peoples. The three provisions of the protocols are:

1. Zero tolerance for violence.

2. Honourable and ethical behaviour in relations with other signatory groups. This includes not denouncing others who have signed this protocol. In other words, to paraphrase the successful leftist strategy of the old Popular Front, "no enemies on the right."

3. Maintaining a high tone in our arguments and public presentations.

The founding endorsers of the New Orleans Protocol are David Duke of EURO and The David Duke Report, Don Black of Stormfront.org, long-time writer and activist Sam G. Dickson, John Tyndall (a founder of the British National Party, but not currently in an executive position in that party), Willis Carto of the American Free Press, Dr. Ed Fields, a National Alliance member and publisher of The Truth at Last newspaper, Kevin Alfred Strom, Media Director of the National Alliance, and David Pringle, Membership Coordinator of the National Alliance, and Paul Fromm of the Canadian Association for Free Expression.

Other groups and individuals are cordially invited to sign on and endorse the New Orleans Protocol.

COMMENTARY:

The New Orleans Protocol is, as David Duke explained, “a historical event.” The European nationalist movement across North America, with our allies in Britain and, we hope, elsewhere are committing ourselves unequivocally to the high road: no more sleazy denunciations of other nationalists on the Internet, which can only give aid and comfort to the enemy or to agents of the state; no more stealing of other groups’ mailing lists or members; and, finally, no tolerance of violence.

The New Orleans Protocol in no way seeks to form an umbrella group. It in no way diminishes the independence of any of the endorsers. It does not involve ideological uniformity. All groups maintain their independence and their own particular agenda and emphases. However, all have pledged to behave in a certain constructive way, as outlined by the Protocol.

The zero tolerance position on violence does not make us into pacifists or prevent us from defending ourselves against attacks. However, all foolish talk about aggressive violence is out-of-line. Indeed, the Canadian experience with CSIS agents like Grant Bristow in the Heritage Front is that those urging violence and illegal measures are usually government agents or agents provocateurs.

The Internet is our communications salvation in the face of increasing minority control of mainline means of communication as well as increased state censorship. However, many individuals use the Internet for 'trash talk' and defamation of other groups and leaders. We don’t object to ideological differences or disagreements over methods. We do, however, believe that loose gossip and defamation serve only to assist our enemies. Those subscribing to the New Orleans Protocol are signalling their intention to abide by honourable standards in relations with others in the nationalist movement.

Those who do not come on board are also signaling either a discomforting ambivalence about violence or an addiction to harmful defamation of patriots in preference to constructive advocacy of their views and a concentration on the enemy.

I personally take considerable satisfaction in the New Orleans Protocol as I have promoted and practised the policy of “no enemy on the right” in Canada for the past 20 years. – Paul Fromm


Source: Henry Reese

Either way, Don Black has allowed, and continues to allow, his site to be involved in internal UK nationalist politics. And that is NOT right !
Why not? A lot of us follow the BNP with great interest.

Well it breaks that protocol. Do you want that protocol or not ?

And we do not want Don Black being involved in OUR internal political business. In case you didn't know, there is, and has been, an internal battle within the BNP. Our group. John Tyndalls section. We do not want jews, Turks and other non-white people in our party. If that is so hard to understand , we must be different nationalists to yourselves.

Peter,

What username are you using on the board? There's no account with the email rochdalebnp@hotmail.com.

I like Nick Griffin, with whom I'm personally acquainted, though I don't think any moderator has removed legitimate posts supporting Tyndal, much less ban the poster.


At 05:55 PM 9/20/2002, you wrote:

Hello Don,

you may recall some correspondence via e-mail with me a few years ago.

I have been denied access to your Stormfront Britain site.

I have not used any bad language or indeed any other language that could offend.

There are a lot of internal disputes within the BNP over here in the UK. It is for this reason that I believe that I have been banned from using the messageboard.

I now support John Tyndall in his crusade, to rid the party of Nick Griffin.


It rather looks like your board/ moderator, is taking sides in this dispute in the UK.

best wishes

Pb




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com