This is movie presents me with a giant question; Is the Jew owned media industry showing this to prevent the sheep to question why Fahren 911 is being blacked out?

I have been able to show many people how the 9.11 trick was acheved aswell as make many people join or effort of waking the world to the jew, but is this movie for the few 10% of the world who think they think? Meaning is the fat worthless pussy micheal moore going to spit out, "war for oil" through out the entire movie? I have emailed his lard ass quite afew times, and not recieved on single response.

I plan on viewing the movie, my bets on the information left out;
1.Pentagon Damage after object struck before portion collapsed
2.BOTH Towers jew owned: Larry Silverstien
3.Wtc7 Jew Owned; Larry Silverstien
4.Both Airlines Jew operated; :Donald Carty AA, Gerwald Greenwald
5. Five Mossad agents caught video taping and cheering Both towers being hit
6. Message sent to israel over odigo system hours before events of 911 warning of attack, allowing only one extermited parasite in one of the most highly infested host cities in the World.
7. decade old footage of Arab children celebrating played as if filmed earler that day
8. Lack of ANY debris resembling a 757 at the pentagon
9.Jew Dr hatfiled stole anthrax from a US Military lab matching strand of antrax sent in 2001.

Most Likly moore is either a jew or in the jews pocket, this is a kinda funny scene from the movie;http://www.fahrenheit911.com/_media/images/trailer/trailer-photo.jpg

Question; Does anybody know who the fat fucking duche bag is talking to? My bet a jew, any help would be great Thank You

Here's the trailer link...

http://www.fahrenheit911.com/trailer/


I would like Mike more if he could, 1) Get his "Gun Facts" straight, and 2) Name the Jews!!!

I honestly think he is just a puppet of the jew, he is for the 10 percent who think they think, hence why jews are not named, im not sure about bowling for columbine; it does seem very pro gun control and the jew sure does love gun control, brady bill and the latest 10 extention ban on assult weapon, Im proud to see jew puppet ronald reagon died it offends me to see the flags half staff for his puppet actor ass.

Making a "documentary" like this without naming the Jew is like making a documentary on gun violence in the US without acknowledging the fact that six percent of the population (male niggers) are responsible for 48 percent of the shootings.

Oh wait, Michael Moore did that already ...

9.Jew Dr hatfiled stole anthrax from a US Military lab matching strand of antrax sent in 2001.



Dr. Hatfield was not a jew and he was not the jew on videotape entering an anthrax lab illegally (to steal anthrax). There is no evidence Hatfield had anything to do with it, he was the patsy. Whatreallyhappened.com covers all this stuff, I believe.

Moore’s Magic: 9/11 Electrifies
by Rex Reed

Michael Moore leaves no turn unstoned. There are multitudes of shattering, seminal moments in his brilliant Bush-whacking documentary, Fahrenheit 9/11, that reveal more about the cynicism, greed and ineptitude in the U.S. government than you will ever learn from any sound bite on the right-wing late-night cable-channel blabfests, but one will stay with me forever. Forget about the "official" reports from the White House about the activities of George W. Bush on the fateful morning of Sept. 11, insisting he learned about the Al Qaeda attacks while meeting with Florida pre-schoolers and quickly dashed from the room to save the country. The truth, it is now revealed, is that he was informed of the first attack on the World Trade Center before he even entered the schoolroom, and he decided to continue with his photo-op anyway. There he is on camera when Andrew Card informs him of the second plane and utters the fatal words, "We’re under attack!"—but he continues to read My Pet Goat for another seven minutes, his eyes sliding sideways in his puzzled face, like a moron looking for a bathroom, until his staff insists that he leave. (He stayed for another half hour.) If nothing else, that defining moment says volumes about what we can expect from the President of the U.S. in the center of a supreme, history-altering crisis: He’s just clueless.

There are other moments that will impact some viewers and polarize others. So many, in fact, that you watch Fahrenheit 9/11 with disbelief, and leave shaking with rage. Sometimes sarcastic, always funny, Mr. Moore is armed with facts, and he presents them accurately and succinctly. The controversial filmmaker stated on the Today show that White House mouthpieces have denounced the film as "outrageously false" without seeing it, and right-wing Republicans have charged Mr. Moore with staging a "left-wing conspiracy" to influence the forthcoming election. Well, duh. For years, reactionary conservatives have been famous for staging right-wing conspiracies of their own to disgrace and discredit elected Democratic public officials. Maybe this is payback time. Whatever it is, everyone should see Fahrenheit 9/11 first—before debating the issues. The purpose of any documentary is to influence opinion. But instead of the customarily droning voice that comments on the action and tells you what to think, this one asks tough, logical questions, gets rational answers, and never loses its entertainment value.

Mr. Moore, who has tackled corporate greed (Roger & Me) and gun control (Bowling for Columbine), now feels driven and obligated to strip the façade from a swaggering, bow-legged, grammatically challenged bully and a cabinet that is beginning to look more like the Third Reich every day. He accuses them of lying about their motivations for declaring war against Iraq, a country that never threatened America in the first place, killing thousands of innocent civilians in retaliation for the acts of 9/11 aggression, although not one of the terrorists was from Iraq, and killing more than 800 of our own American kids (all from ethnic or working-class families). Nobody denies that Saddam Hussein was a monster, but not the Iraqi women and children who have been "saved" from one villain only to be burned and shot and maimed for life without arms and legs by villains in a different uniform. At the same time, Mr. Moore shows Mr. Bush justifying American atrocities against Saddam Hussein by actually saying to the camera, "He tried to kill my daddy." Like his daddy, he knows he might also get kicked out of the White House after serving only one term. Still, he pursues a war that is losing the "hearts and minds" of even the boys who fight it (the interviews with our soldiers on the front lines will make you weep) while earning the U.S. unprecedented heights of global hatred and distrust, even from long-standing allies. And he does it on the golf course, ignoring the pressing domestic issues of health care, education, Social Security, unemployment and the economy while instructing frustrated reporters to watch his next drive. (In his first eight months in office, he was on vacation 42 percent of the time.) Meanwhile the current occupants of the White House, bolstered by an irresponsible press that has never bothered to ask the right questions, have courted public support by hammering home the kind of fear and born-again religious ideology that keep people subservient and paralyzed. Mr. Moore is saying that in the lineup of fear factors, terrorists and sinners may have replaced Communists and beatniks, but if you keep the people frightened enough, the bully always wins.

The movie begins with the awesome night in 2000 when the U. S. Supreme Court decided the election, not the American voters, then unveils footage that was never reported on TV of the Bush inauguration limousine being pelted with raw eggs. Instead of the traditional walk to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, he was so afraid to leave the car that he became the first President in history who was forced to sneak into the White House through a back door.

It was downhill from there, and Mr. Moore has obtained amazing film to illustrate the graphic two-hour slam-dunk that follows. In the wimpy reportage that has dominated the media for four years, very few journalists have bothered to investigate the shroud of secrecy surrounding the Bush Presidency that keeps the people ignorant, to write about it, to explain it. Mr. Moore does it with wit and cleverness. There’s no doubt that he would do anything to prevent a Bush re-election, but there is no conjecture here. No embellishment. He doesn’t need any. Dubya & Co. are easy targets: Mr. Moore simply turns on his cameras and lets them hang themselves. He proves the $1.5 billion in profits the Bush clan has made from oil interests of the family of Osama bin Laden, the real perpetrator of the 9/11 disaster, then asks why, when all aircraft were grounded after 9/11, the White House allowed several planes to fly around the country picking up the bin Laden family and protectively escorting 142 Saudis out of the country without interrogation, overruling the protests of the F.B.I. You can say, "Yes, but his family has denounced Osama, so what’s the problem?" The problem is that the Bushes, père et fils, were in business with his family at the same time that Osama was under surveillance as a suspected Al Qaeda terrorist and neglected to make a full disclosure.

Mr. Moore also reveals Dubya’s military records, blotting out the name of a fellow pilot whose flight status was suspended for refusing to take a physical exam. The friend Bush was trying to protect turns out to be James R. Bath, who both managed the U.S. financial investments of the bin Laden regime and bankrolled the various oil interests of the Bush brigade. Cut to Dubya, arrogantly stating: "Access is power." Then, when he was investigated by the S.E.C., the man who got Bush out of hot water, Robert W. Jordan, was later appointed ambassador to—you guessed it—Saudi Arabia. The ironies pile up like body bags.

Now that the merde has hit the oscillator, so to speak, Mr. Moore charges that the Bush administration is still trying to hide evidence of its own stupidity by censoring 28 pages of the independent report by the 9/11 commission. If you don’t gasp at the sight of Mr. Bush dining with the Saudi ambassador with part of the Pentagon in flames in the background, this movie is not for you. No need to talk about the President welcoming the Taliban to the State Department, knowing they were harboring the man who bombed the U.S.S. Cole. No need to go into the plans to build an underground pipeline through Afghanistan pumping money into a company owned by Vice President Dick Cheney. Alarmingly, it’s all gone unreported by an irresponsible press corps. With $860 billion currently invested by the Saudis in American business, no wonder our tax money pays for a six-man detail to protect the Saudi ambassador in Washington. But why does it take Michael Moore to tell us? This is all very dispiriting. But unless you’ve lost your sense of humor completely, you’ve just gotta laugh when Mr. Moore intercuts Mr. Bush’s tough talk from cowboy movies with actual footage of the corny cowboys in those movies saying exactly the same things.

[cont'd]

http://www.observer.com/pages/onthetown.asp

I’ve hardly scratched the surface of this electrifying documentary. Mr. Moore even cruises through Washington reading from a loudspeaker the idiotic USA PATRIOT Act—hastily passed by Congress without ever reading it—and chronicling the lunacy it has inspired: groups and individuals harassed by cops for holding private club meetings, a woman who was refused admittance to an airplane because she was carrying breast milk. All diversionary tactics, says Mr. Moore, to distract the American people from viewing the corpses sent home from Iraq for funerals that have never once been attended by President George W. Bush, or debunking the myth of "weapons of mass destruction." People of all ages are shown voicing doubts about the kids who have died in a questionable war with no end in sight, and for what? Bush says, "Defending freedom." This movie says, "Making money." And talk about imbalance. Fact: Out of 535 members of Congress, only one has a child serving in Iraq. One of the most telling scenes in Fahrenheit 9/11 is Michael Moore, standing outside the U.S. Senate with a microphone, trying to convince members of Congress to enlist their own children for the war. Not a single Senator or Representative is willing to send his own children into harm’s way. This is one of the few scenes in which the director appears at length. One of the things that makes this movie better and more convincing than his previous films is the way Mr. Moore stays mostly in the background, compiling facts and letting the evidence speak for itself.

The Cannes cognoscenti and the limousine liberals have already declared Fahrenheit 9/11 the blockbuster documentary of the year. Who knows how it will play in Punkin Crick? I think it should be required viewing for every American, but as usual, I fear the people who could learn the most from the issues it raises will avoid it like a fund-raiser for free abortions. Mr. Moore’s opponents will label it ideologically fueled partisan agitprop, which it is, but any visionary who tries to cultivate change is destined to harvest adversaries. With his usual fury channeled and under control, Mr. Moore sets out to prick, probe and sound a wake-up call in an emotionally charged election year where the truth has been buried six feet under, and succeeds with humor and bite. The result is undeniably galvanizing, immensely watchable and damned good filmmaking. If it convinces one nonvoter to think, it will serve a purpose. The saddest and most infuriating thing I learned from Fahrenheit 9/11 is not the political hackwork, but the reality of what a lightweight the President is in the context of American history. George W. Bush may be the first President of the U.S. who has brainwashed himself.

You may reach Rex Reed via email at: rreed@observer.com

I plan on seeing this Sunday, should be worth matinee price.

Moore is a grandstanding fat slob, but fuck, I really hate Bush and Friends. Although, in a country which government and media are the same thing, people like Moore, not Moore himself per se are a necessary part of the exchange of information.

I hate Bush & friends too, but Michael Moore is the fake opposition.

He stayed quiet about he torture in Abu Ghraib, he doesn't want to show his Nick Berg tape, to sum it up: He doesn't name the jew.

But watching his movie is better than televitz, that is true.

Ha! I love it! Moore had doomed president bush.

I wont be suprised if Moore is arrested in the middle of the night.

Dr. Hatfield was not a jew and he was not the jew on videotape entering an anthrax lab illegally (to steal anthrax). There is no evidence Hatfield had anything to do with it, he was the patsy. Whatreallyhappened.com covers all this stuff, I believe.
The guy photographed entering the lab - who had no legal right to do so - is named Zack and is indeed a kike.

Ha! I love it! Moore had doomed president bush.

I wont be suprised if Moore is arrested in the middle of the night.
No, it's not Moore who has doomed bush, but Soros and the other filthy kikes who don't need that drooling retard anymore and will move on to the next hand puppet - untainted with the Iraq disaster (but not for long).

Heil Hitler

fake opposition

I think the democrats are the fake oppisition in this election. Moore is far left (hence his Nader endorsement in 2000), and definately 'out of the mainstream'. Like any good leftist, Moore belives in fundamental equality of the races, welfare, and multiculturalism.

But to give him credit, the only real (heard) criticism of Israel nowadays comes from the far left, as well as criticism of NWO and Free Trade ludiocrity. The problem is, the leftists don't really put together the puzzle pieces behind these two concepts....

Free trade can be good in the IPE, but right now it's being used and abused so it's doing far more harm than good....

Michael Moore will never name the Jews. Besides Moore, the Executive Producers for Fahrenheit 9/11 are the slimy Jewish Weinstein brothers. Watch the very end of the trailer and you will see.

FYI, Dr. Pierce wrote about the Weinstein brothers.
http://www.natvan.com/pub/1998/081598.txt

While watching the trailer (towards the end), when the guitar music started playing, I had the feeling I was watching a documentary film on the 1960s.

I think I'm going to see the movie anyways.

Here's the trailer link...

http://www.fahrenheit911.com/trailer/


I would like Mike more if he could, 1) Get his "Gun Facts" straight, and 2) Name the Jews!!!

But to give him credit, the only real (heard) criticism of Israel nowadays comes from the far left, as well as criticism of NWO and Free Trade ludiocrity. The problem is, the leftists don't really put together the puzzle pieces behind these two concepts....

They're getting there. Slowly.

Adbusters already got to Jewish power. Plus, leftist leadership is very much a following proposition. The people in the organizations are way ahead of the platform committees; check out how the Sierra Club leaders hide from their own members on the immigration issue.

I'm gonna go see Farenheit 911 tomorrow. Just to spot how many people in the audience are ahead of Moore, which happened once before on the trade issue (Roger & Me).

They're getting there. Slowly.

Adbusters already got to Jewish power. Plus, leftist leadership is very much a following proposition. The people in the organizations are way ahead of the platform committees; check out how the Sierra Club leaders hide from their own members on the immigration issue.

I'm gonna go see Farenheit 911 tomorrow. Just to spot how many people in the audience are ahead of Moore, which happened once before on the trade issue (Roger & Me).

I just saw it this evening. This movie is an unrelenting assreaming of George W. Bush and his cabal. He even smacks some democrats around for good measure. I already stated this in another thread, but my biggest gripe is that he didn't mention Israeli involvement in 9/11 or the Iraq war. Also, there were an interracial couple in the movie (though you feel bad for 'em after learning what Bush's war has done).

I was talking with my dad after the movie about the lack if Israeli discussion, and a few guys come up to us and agreed, noting "They'll never discuss that in the mainstream." Anyways, it's a pretty emotional picture, and I saw quite a few women crying. But it's also pretty funny at times.

If Moore just wisened up on welfare/immigration and the Jewish media control....



..

What type of soldiers are you all? YOu go watch some kiked out movie, with people only hearing, once again the half story, and you all just walk out thinking, wow what crap, jewed movie. YOU HAVE PEOPLE INTERESTED IN THE TRUTH! AND YOUR LETTING THE JEW THINK FOR THEM AGAIN

As soon as i have a chance to go view this movie Im recruting all of them, its a war on information my friends! We cant let the jew infest the minds of these people any more! Go veiw this movie, at the end dont just walk ot with your thumb up your ass! Grab your balls go to the front get thier attention tell them this is a half ass lie, and you wish to give them the story left out! I talk to everybody i run into about our jewed government with very good results, most of my friend now hate the jew as much as you and I and are as awake to them as you and I are now, so do this world a favor get copies of your email address and give it to "911 f" viewers THEY ARE INTERESTED THEY ARE CURIOUS THEY HAVE OPEN MINDS THEY ARE NOT THE AVERAGE SHEEP! I HAVE THE POLICE INTERESTED I HAVE A FREAKING PLAN, who ever is ready please inform me at mothermaryjane@mail.com...we will plan recuitments at the movie we cannot live like this! WE AND ONLY WE CAN STOP THIS, LETS ROLLL<<< sorry sorry had to give a little jew humor

BUT ITS TIME PEOPLE ITS TIME WE WAKE THE WORLD AND NOW AT THIS VERY MOMENT IS THE TIME! WE NEED TO TAKE ACTION!
MAIL ME MOTHERMARYJANE@MAIL.com

My webpage is 911wakeup.net!

If hitler wasnt a sniveling jew aswell you think he would have done what you all did?

TAKE THE MOMENT NOW IS THE TIME

If you want to be less....uh, outgoing, you can bring up the mossad agents who were arrested after 9/11, as well as how much Israel gains from Iraq's fall (and the resident Jews in the administration).



Grab your balls go to the front get thier attention tell them this is a half ass lie

Don't you mean half-truth? This movie isn't really lying about anything, they just covered the arabs, and ignored the Jewish involvement.


..

I'm pleased to see another person acknowledge that there is indeed absolutely no evidence that a Boeing crashed into the Pentagon that day.

8. Lack of ANY debris resembling a 757 at the pentagon

Here is a French website that further elaborates on this issue:

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

I believe that, when discussing the 9-11 hoax with a programmed, brainwashed lemming, this aspect of the "attack" is a good place to start. If one can be shown pictures showing that not one shred of an enormous commercial airliner is at the Pentagon, then any one not hopeless willfully ignorant might well be able to rationally discuss the possibility that the government and the jewmedia might not be telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about that day.

To me the Pentagon question is the figurative tip of the iceberg, which can be used a great starting piont for further discusstion of what really happened. It is sad that most Americans swallow the whole media bullshit story hook, line, and sinker. It just proves that people would rather be led along like sheep than do any thinking for themselves. You simply cannot overestimate the ignorance of the average lemming.

For that further discussion of 9-11 look here:

http://serendipity.911review.org/index.html

Some photos for your edification:

Big old jet airliner, don't go disentigrating into your individual atoms: http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/sozen.pentagon_1.jpg
Disappearing jets and the one ring:
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/pelouse.jpg
Where'd it go man?
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/visites8.jpg
A far far more likely culprit:
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/acm86c1.gif

I saw the movie today and here's my review I just posted on my website:

Fahrenheit 9/11
reviewed June 26, 2004

Michael Moore is a fat, slovenly maker of biased, one-sided left-wing films that purport to be documentaries. His first major effort, “Roger and Me,” came out in 1989 and was highly successful. Moore chose a safe target in the person of Roger Smith, CEO of General Motors, and accused him of literally destroying his home town of Flint Michigan by closing down its auto factories. But “Roger” wasn’t the kind of dry documentary so often seen on PBS, as it was laced with humor and irony. In spite of its obvious bias, it was a funny film. Moore usually comes across in his films as an “aw shucks” kind of regular guy and, much like film critic Roger Ebert, deftly manages to conceal his true hard-left ideology.

I haven’t seen any of his films since then, including the recent “Bowling for Columbine,” a pro-gun control propaganda piece I had no interest in upsetting myself over. Now while I am at his polar opposite on most issues, there are two big things I agree with Moore about. First is his outspoken opposition to the invasion of Iraq and second is his total contempt for George W. Bush. These are the subjects of “Fahrenheit 9/11,” widely publicized as having devastatingly funny footage of Dumbo and exposing the lies and hypocrisy of the whole phony “war on terrorism.” I eagerly awaited its widely-publicized opening this weekend, but, alas, I learned that it wasn’t being shown at our local eight-screen cinema. Not to be deterred, however, I drove the 85 miles to Lancaster (in Los Angeles County) this morning and arrived in time to catch the 11:00 matinee in one of their huge multiplex compounds.

“F-9/11” didn’t exactly get off on the right foot with me in its opening sequences. Even before the first titles appear on the screen, we see footage of protests at Bush’s 2001 Inauguration and of blacks in Congress claiming mass voter fraud in Florida. Moore clearly wants us to believe that Bush Jr. stole the election through corrupt election officials and a Republican Supreme Court and began his term as an illegitimate leader. Now I have heard even White Nationalists make the same charge of illegitimacy, but as much as I now hate Bush, I’m not going to be hypocritical. I supported Bush in that election and thought at the time the Court made the right decision in bringing a quick end to a vote-counting controversy that could have dragged on for months with real peril to the nation’s security. So Moore lost me right away on that point and showed himself to be a real hardcore nigger-lover as well.

But Moore quickly moves on to the beginning of Bush’s tenure in office, and now I’m beginning to tune in on his wavelength. Very funny are the clips of Dumbo at his Texas ranch taking a month’s vacation just prior to September 11, 2001. As Moore shows it, the new president spends most of his time boating or playing golf and is inattentive to his executive duties, to say the least. No doubt Republican loyalists will cry foul, and it is most certainly true that these and other sequences have been cleverly cut and pasted. However, there is nothing cut when the camera captures Bush’s initial reaction upon being informed of the 9/11 attacks. Dumbo just sits there in the classroom with a blank look on his face and continues to read children’s stories for at least ten minutes after he has just been informed that the nation is under attack. “Who’s in charge here?” is the question which just shouts at you when you watch this devastating footage.

Obviously, Bush, Jr. is a puppet, and a very inarticulate one at that. Moore shows us plenty of evidence that this president is really just a spoiled and not-too-bright frat boy who lets others make the serious decisions. Some of the clips have been shown on TV as part of the pre-release publicity, but they are still funny to watch again on the big screen. I’m thinking particularly of the one where Bush earnestly speaks to the camera about how we are fighting terrorism and, in the next breath – apparently thinking the camera has been turned off – picks up his golf driver and says to the accompanying reporters, “now watch this shot.”

Eventually Moore moves on to the Iraq invasion and Bush’s lying justifications for it. I totally agree that this war was based on a hidden agenda, as indeed was the whole “war on terrorism.” Moore shows an inept new president slipping badly in popularity and 9/11 coming along at an extremely opportune time. He shows the ugly reality of that war and contrasts it to the public statements of Rumsfeld, CongoLeeza Rice and others in the administration, and he also shows the complicity of the news media and Democrats in the whole production.

Who are the culprits in this whole mess, according to Michael Moore? Who is setting this hidden agenda and what are their motives? Here is where Moore and I part company in a big way. According to this film, it is all about a bunch of rich and greedy Saudi oil sheiks and their rich and greedy American counterparts. There is not a single mention of Israel anywhere in “F-9/11”! I repeat, not a single word. We do get a couple shots of Wolfowitz – one particularly funny if disgusting one of him twice wetting his comb with his spit and then running the comb through his hair – but he is never labeled as the Zionist jew that he is. Much of the film deals with the Bin Laden family ties to Bush, Sr. and Moore seems to accept the conventional wisdom that Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. He makes a big deal out of how Bin Laden family members were whisked out of the country even while all other aircraft were grounded, but he never says anything about the Israeli spies who were also quickly whisked out of the country at about the same time. Bin Laden himself has stated three reasons for the attack, and they all involve U.S. support for Israel. Again, no mention of that in “F-9/11.”

The point is – need I belabor it more? – that this is a jew-safe documentary. Well, what do you expect when Bob and Harvey Weinstein are listed as executive producers? No mention is made of the Zionist jews advising Bush or their plans to invade Iraq long before 9/11. No mention that there is even such a thing as a state of Israel in the mid-east. No, it’s all about Big Oil and Big Business, even though the evidence now shows that the big oil companies did not in fact wish to invade Iraq. It’s also all about the poor, disadvantaged niggers who are unfairly conscripted to fight this war, according to Moore. This is also contra-factual, because it is really White American soldiers who have been doing the brunt of the fighting and dying in Iraq. At one point, he makes the off-the-wall claim that the system forces these blacks to live in poverty so they can be recruited into the military. No, Michael, niggers create their own poverty and most of them are too stupid to be of any value to Marine recruiters.

“F-9/11” also spends an inordinate amount of time with one Lena Lipscomb of Flint, Michigan. She is first seen as a patriotic mother of servicemen dutifully hanging out her American flag every morning. We then learn she wears a piece of jewelry around her neck in the form of a small multicolored cross, which she says represents her “multicultural family.” The next time we see her it is with her large negro husband surrounded by mullato niglets. She has learned that her mixed-race son serving in Iraq has just been killed, and the tears and bitterness begin to flow. They continue to flow as Ms. Lipscomb tries to visit the White House and express her anger. Why all of the focus on the grief of this one mother of one dead mulatto soldier? There is actually more total footage of her, I believe, than there is of President Bush.

As I left the theater, I pondered the question of whether it would be possible to make an honest documentary about 9/11. First, do we have the talent, and second, could we ever get it seen by anyone? I can’t answer either one, but I do know that there is plenty of material that would make a really riveting documentary in the hands of a skillful and honest filmmaker. Michael Moore is indeed a very skillful filmmaker, but I strongly question his honesty. He himself is no longer the poor working-class slob he’d like his audience to think he is. Hymiewood has made him very rich and he appears to enjoy the celebrity. He must know much more than he is willing to reveal in this film.

Nevertheless, “F-9/11” is worth seeing. Except for the Lipscomb sequences, it moves swiftly and doesn’t get bogged down in spite of its length – two hours, quite long for a documentary. VNN and White Alert readers will be infuriated at all of the pro-nigger and race-mixing propaganda, but will enjoy the Bush-bashing. It is a powerful indictment against the war in Iraq, even it is dead wrong on the motivation for that war. It is also an antidote to the daily diet of patriotic pabulum we get on the joo toob, even though it too carries the kosher seal.

RICH BROOKS

©2004 Rich Brooks. All rights reserved.

here: http://www.whitealert.com/fahrenheit_911.htm

http://www.whitealert.com

"my biggest gripe is that he didn't mention Israeli involvement in 9/11 or the Iraq war"

I think Moore KNOWS mentioning Israel in that context would have scuttled the film's distribution. He also knows that such an allegation would likely see him have a nasty accident.

Moore is no fool. I think he has picked just the right blend of facts which he feels the American masses can swallow without spewing.

What about a sequel in a few months?

"my biggest gripe is that he didn't mention Israeli involvement in 9/11 or the Iraq war"

I think Moore KNOWS mentioning Israel in that context would have scuttled the film's distribution. He also knows that such an allegation would likely see him have a nasty accident.

Moore is no fool. I think he has picked just the right blend of facts which he feels the American masses can swallow without spewing.

What about a sequel in a few months?

Yeah that's true. The two Jewish executive producers may have also had a vested interest. Though Moore is not anti-Jew, he's certainly anti-Zionist, and he probably does know more than he lets on his movie.


.

The Weinsteins I believe. Imagine them making a movie
available for public viewing which imlicates Israel in 911?

More's 911 movie is making people think. They cannot be expected to swallow the whole grotesque reality of Isael all at once.

Bit by bit the truth will out.

This movie is bound to whet the public's appetite for the the whole truth, but when they find it they may decide they'd rather puke. To wit, I can't help but think of Karen Carpenter, the popular '70s vocalist (and "slim" syrup of ipecac connoisseur) who the older folks here may remember singing "we've only just begun..."

Compared to this fine work by Tim Howells, Ph.D., Moore is 911-lite:

http://physics911.org/net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=18

"my biggest gripe is that he didn't mention Israeli involvement in 9/11 or the Iraq war"

I think Moore KNOWS mentioning Israel in that context would have scuttled the film's distribution. He also knows that such an allegation would likely see him have a nasty accident.

Moore is no fool. I think he has picked just the right blend of facts which he feels the American masses can swallow without spewing.

What about a sequel in a few months?












Moore is nothing but a slimy piece of shit without an ounce of integrity.
To say he is a second-rate propagandist,liar and professional obfuscator would be an understatement.Moore is nothing but a "left"version of Rush Limbaugh.Just as Limbaugh ranted about Clinton for 8 years,so does Moore now paint shabbos goy Bush as the root of all evil.He serves the function of misdirecting the goyim.How else do you think he gets book deals and distribution for his flicks?Moore is as jew-safe as they come.As long as the focus stays on Bush,corporations,"big oil" and other safe targets,no one notices the hook nose in the tent.

I knew Moore was full of shit when in his "Bowling for Columbine" crockumentary he feigned not to comprehend the reason America has so much more violent crime than Denmark or Sweden or some other 90% white country.Moore pretended not to notice the nigger and spic gang members who commit the majority of gun violence in America.

Moore is safe and controlled opposition,a World Net Daily,Fox News, or Free Republic for the dipshit liberal set.He gets rich pretending to be in opposition to the system when he IS the system.

I'm pleased to see another person acknowledge that there is indeed absolutely no evidence that a Boeing crashed into the Pentagon that day.



Here is a French website that further elaborates on this issue:

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

I believe that, when discussing the 9-11 hoax with a programmed, brainwashed lemming, this aspect of the "attack" is a good place to start. If one can be shown pictures showing that not one shred of an enormous commercial airliner is at the Pentagon, then any one not hopeless willfully ignorant might well be able to rationally discuss the possibility that the government and the jewmedia might not be telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about that day.

To me the Pentagon question is the figurative tip of the iceberg, which can be used a great starting piont for further discusstion of what really happened. It is sad that most Americans swallow the whole media bullshit story hook, line, and sinker. It just proves that people would rather be led along like sheep than do any thinking for themselves. You simply cannot overestimate the ignorance of the average lemming.

For that further discussion of 9-11 look here:

http://serendipity.911review.org/index.html

Some photos for your edification:

Big old jet airliner, don't go disentigrating into your individual atoms: http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/sozen.pentagon_1.jpg
Disappearing jets and the one ring:
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/pelouse.jpg
Where'd it go man?
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/visites8.jpg
A far far more likely culprit:
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/acm86c1.gif

What I dont understand is why isn't there any video footage of the airplane going into the pentagon? I mean, you would think that washington would have surveilence cameras everywhere. And, being that washington is a tourist attraction you would think that some dim-witted tourist managed to get a snap shot right before it crashed.

He has stated that he will next do a movie on the Israel/Palestine conflict. I can't see how he can avoid pissing off the Jew with that. He better hire some bodyguards.
I saw F911 today and I agree with you. No dancing Israelis, no mention of the Odigo-inspired "miraculous passover" wherein no Israeli showed up for work. No mention of the jewish owner of the building, stock transactions, insurance, Norad, etc. Too much for the sheeple to swallow at once.

"my biggest gripe is that he didn't mention Israeli involvement in 9/11 or the Iraq war"

I think Moore KNOWS mentioning Israel in that context would have scuttled the film's distribution. He also knows that such an allegation would likely see him have a nasty accident.

Moore is no fool. I think he has picked just the right blend of facts which he feels the American masses can swallow without spewing.

What about a sequel in a few months?

Moore is nothing but a slimy piece of shit without an ounce of integrity.
To say he is a second-rate propagandist,liar and professional obfuscator would be an understatement.Moore is nothing but a "left"version of Rush Limbaugh.Just as Limbaugh ranted about Clinton for 8 years,so does Moore now paint shabbos goy Bush as the root of all evil.He serves the function of misdirecting the goyim.How else do you think he gets book deals and distribution for his flicks?Moore is as jew-safe as they come.As long as the focus stays on Bush,corporations,"big oil" and other safe targets,no one notices the hook nose in the tent.

I knew Moore was full of shit when in his "Bowling for Columbine" crockumentary he feigned not to comprehend the reason America has so much more violent crime than Denmark or Sweden or some other 90% white country.Moore pretended not to notice the nigger and spic gang members who commit the majority of gun violence in America.

Moore is safe and controlled opposition,a World Net Daily,Fox News, or Free Republic for the dipshit liberal set.He gets rich pretending to be in opposition to the system when he IS the system.

Totally agree. I suppose it's better than no opposition at all, tho.

http://www.whitealert.com

What I dont understand is why isn't there any video footage of the airplane going into the pentagon? I mean, you would think that washington would have surveilence cameras everywhere. And, being that washington is a tourist attraction you would think that some dim-witted tourist managed to get a snap shot right before it crashed.

Hey dude, there was no plane. And no tourist could possible spot a cruise missile in flight. I've seen the footage of the impact but I'll be damned if I can find it lately or remember where it was on the net. If I do I'll post a link. It's film from an entrance gate camera and there is no sign of anything but a cruise missile hitting and exploding.

Look at the photos again and try to locate one piece of a Boeing 757. The point is not whether there is footage of a plane piloted by Dune Coons heading in toward the Pentagon, but rather that there is not one single shred of a 100 ton airliner located at the Pentagon in the photos I have presented to you, all of which are authentic and were taken only minutes after the "attack". Can't you realize that the gov and the jewmedia are full of it and will stop at nothing to cement Israel/US alliance and create a NWO? How thick do you have to be? How can you believe ZOG and question the truth? In this case the photos tell far more than a thousand words?

Even Rumsfeld said it was a missile.

Hey dude, there was no plane. And no tourist could possible spot a cruise missile in flight. I've seen the footage of the impact but I'll be damned if I can find it lately or remember where it was on the net. If I do I'll post a link. It's film from an entrance gate camera and there is no sign of anything but a cruise missile hitting and exploding.

Look at the photos again and try to locate one piece of a Boeing 757. The point is not whether there is footage of a plane piloted by Dune Coons heading in toward the Pentagon, but rather that there is not one single shred of a 100 ton airliner located at the Pentagon in the photos I have presented to you, all of which are authentic and were taken only minutes after the "attack". Can't you realize that the gov and the jewmedia are full of it and will stop at nothing to cement Israel/US alliance and create a NWO? How thick do you have to be? How can you believe ZOG and question the truth? In this case the photos tell far more than a thousand words?

Here's one photo of the impact at the Pentagon, I'm still looking for the video that shows the entire sequence. This is from a Pentagon parking camera. It's enough to yet again prove that no airliner was involved in the attack.

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/slide3.jpg

I still can't understand why Americans and others cling to tovoe, the official version of events. Is is just stubborness or faith in the powers that be or willful ignorance or outright blindness?

A great way to turn whites to our side is to use the all important 9-11 as a starting point. I for one consider it nothing but ZOG trickery, but your average white lemming has a huge emotional investment in it. We need to exploit for the double edged sword it is.

They hate Islam and the Muslims so much they will believe any cock and bull story as long as it justifies that latent hatred. I find it truly unbelievable.

A quote about that day at the Pentagon: "I can see only one reason to cling to the belief that AA 77 hit the Pentagon. The unshakable faith that the government would not — could not — lie to us. A faith so strong that the laws of physics and motion suspend themselves in order to maintain it."

Hey white nationalist, the government hates you and wants you to die. Fact. Are you going to keep believing your murderer?

Some other interesting tidbits about the tip of the iceberg:

# The damage to the Pentagon is not severe enough to have been caused by the impact of a 100-ton aircraft with a wingspan of 38 meters travelling at a speed of at least 250 mph.
# Not only is there no debris on the lawn in front of the wall but the grass shows no sign of having been burnt from the incineration of massive quantities of fuel from the (alleged) plane's ruptured tanks.
# In any aircraft crash, no matter how horrific, there are always recognizable sections of the fuselage remaining.
# Photos of the crash site reveal windows just above the entrance hole in which the glass is unbroken.

Still believe jewmedia? Sorry.

Hey dude, there was no plane. And no tourist could possible spot a cruise missile in flight. I've seen the footage of the impact but I'll be damned if I can find it lately or remember where it was on the net. If I do I'll post a link. It's film from an entrance gate camera and there is no sign of anything but a cruise missile hitting and exploding.

Look at the photos again and try to locate one piece of a Boeing 757. The point is not whether there is footage of a plane piloted by Dune Coons heading in toward the Pentagon, but rather that there is not one single shred of a 100 ton airliner located at the Pentagon in the photos I have presented to you, all of which are authentic and were taken only minutes after the "attack". Can't you realize that the gov and the jewmedia are full of it and will stop at nothing to cement Israel/US alliance and create a NWO? How thick do you have to be? How can you believe ZOG and question the truth? In this case the photos tell far more than a thousand words?

Where did I ever say that I "believe zog"? I agree with you on the pentagon and believe it was a lie. I merely questioned the lack of video evidence to confirm my beliefs that the whole thing was a hoax. Think twice next time before you blast someone and accuse them of worshipping zog!

Ok, no 757 wreckage - no parts of the wings, no seats, no fueselage, etc. - I have to agree with this point.
But, I only have one question than: what the fuck happened to those people on AA #77???

If it was a missle or bomb or what have you, then what the fuck happened to that flight #77? The folks inside? The plane itself?
They are dead, are they not?
And please don't respond with 'zog had them killed and the plane destroyed' or some stupid shit thereof.

It does seem fairly obvious that there is much more than meets the eye when it comes to how/why 9-11 happened.
There is definite classified information not told to the people.

However, some of you are taking the conspriracy a little too far.
Yes, I think that Israel knew that 9-11 or some attack like it would happen.
No, I seriously doubt that they told the US govt. and the govt. let this happen. Anyone who believes in such nonsense is a complete fucking fool - WN or not.

However, all of the rest of the "information" cited by nolongersleeping only serves to discredit whatever may be true but hidden from the people.

I tend to think that there is always more than meets the eye to large scale events, things can always be explained. There are rational reasons for everything.
But, as humans generally do, we like to see what we want to, ignoring facts and common sense to fit our own perceptions.
One can see almost anything from the stars and clouds.
Perceptions are dangerous things sometimes.

As for the film, I did see Farenheit 9-11 and I will have to recommend this film. Sure, Moore ignores the Jewish question totally.
But, it does not pull any punches regarding Bush the idiot and his neo-con cabal of pro-zionist/pro-corporate chicken hawks.
The Iraqi people come off looking pretty good in Moore's eyes.
If you were a young Iraqi male, wouldn't you want to take out a couple of Amerikwan soldiers with an RPG invading and conquering YOUR country?
I know I sure would.

There is some pro-multicultural action....the poor Michigan blacks sent to fight for corporate whitey's war....a mixed race couple in Flint who has their son killed in Iiraq (he's white, mommy must have gone dark later in life)....that sort of thing. It's really not race oriented, moslty about the poor fighting for the richs' wars, the working class keeping the economic and financial hierarchy intact.
Moore is a dyed in the wool liberal no doubt.
But, in a round about way, this jew safe version of things does a fairly good job of raising some very valid points regarding our current state of affairs.
Moore ignores Israel and focuses exclusively on economic factors.
The Saudi own approx. 8% of total US wealth.
They are not stupid.

I sometimes get the feeling that the elite arabs (like the Saudis) and the jews (Israel) are waging a non-lethal war within the USA for govt. and economic influence of our for sale money grubbing country, the US.
The US is not a nation-state anymore, only a place to make some money and get them to do your dirty work.
Our govt. is not for the people, only for the money and power - hence, the arabic and jew involvement in our business.
It's all a lie and the ancient war between the kikes and muslims is waged in very subtle ways within our govt. system.

Interesting, isn't it?

F9-11 does raise some good question but is too jew safe to really explain many things.

An interview with Michael Moore here: http://www.pulse24.com/In_The_Raw/Raw_Video/20040618-001/Video-5-2.asx

4,000 Israelis worked in the WTC on 9/10/2001. How may died? Anywhere from one to five. Account for that miraculous passover with any other reason than israeli foreknowlege. Odigo, does that ring a bell? dancing Israelis? 120-160 mossad agents arrested and then sent quietly home? Stock transactions done that morning predicated on the event? Mossad agents living next-door to the alleged "terrorists"?
If Israel knew of it then their Neoconservative fifth-columnist agents did, and if those handlers had foreknowlege then so did their stooge, Bush (insofar as they allowed it. You can tell by the Florida schoolroom video that he knew that it was "the big one". He didn't bat an eye when Andrew card told him of the second strike and Card didn't miss a stride waiting for a response he knew wasn't coming.)


It does seem fairly obvious that there is much more than meets the eye when it comes to how/why 9-11 happened.
There is definite classified information not told to the people.

However, some of you are taking the conspriracy a little too far.
Yes, I think that Israel knew that 9-11 or some attack like it would happen.
No, I seriously doubt that they told the US govt. and the govt. let this happen. Anyone who believes in such nonsense is a complete fucking fool - WN or not.

To believe that someone could possibly fabricate an airliner crashing into the Pentagon simply goes beyond. Do you believe in E.T. too?

The airliner did a wide loop, then almost clipped the building my company is in (top 12th floor, many witnesses there) and then into the Pentagon. I also talked to a receptionist on a top floor in Crystal City (just across from the Pentagon) who witnessed the whole thing.

An airline crashing into a structure like the Pentagon at full throttle would simply disintegrate in a fireball, but I'm sure there was plenty of plane debris scattered in the Courtyard (center of Pentagon).

But wait, I forgot that the FAA is controlled by Zog.

Get a grip and take some anti-schizoid medication.

Opposed by everyone in the world who was not bought off, the illegal invasion of Iraq was undertaken for many reasons — the imminent replacement of the dollar by the euro as the world's primary currency, the tempting lure of untapped oil reserves, the desire to consolidate U.S./Israeli military hegemony over a strategically vital region — but the most important reason was to further obscure questions about the awesome deception staged by the American government that has come to be known as 9/11.

9/11 was a hoax. This is no longer a wild conspiracy assertion; it is a fact, supported by thousands of other verifiable facts, foremost of which are:

* The attacks of 9/11 COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED without the willful failure of the American defense system. In Washington, Air Force pilots demanded to fly but were ordered to stand down. Yet instead of prosecuting the president and military leaders for this unprecedented dereliction of duty, military leaders were promoted and the president was praised for presiding over a defense system that suspiciously failed the most crucial test in its history. None of the deaths would have happened without the deliberate unplugging of America's air defenses.

Planes that lose contact with control towers are usually intercepted by fighter jets inside of ten minutes, as the incident with the golfer's plane a few months earlier so clearly demonstrated. Yet on 9/11, the jetliners that struck New York were allowed to proceed unmolested for more than a half-hour, and the plane that supposedly crashed in Washington was not intercepted for more than an hour and forty minutes after it was widely known that four planes had been hijacked.

* The twin towers could not have collapsed as a result of burning jet fuel. Most of that fuel was consumed on impact. In the south tower, most of the fuel was spilled outside the building. Heat caused by burning jet fuel does not reach temperatures needed to melt steel. What does stand out as particularly suspicious and still unexplained is that fires raged out of control beneath THREE of the collapsed towers for ONE HUNDRED DAYS, clearly indicating the presence of some kind of substance utilized in the demolition of the structures.

The Twin Towers did not fall because of plane impacts or fires. Most likely explosives were placed on structural supports in the towers (as was done in Oklahoma City), and these controlled implosions snuffed out the lives of three thousand people.

* FBI Director Robert Mueller insisted officials had no idea this kind of attack could happen when in fact the FBI had been investigating the possibility of EXACTLY this kind of attack for almost TEN YEARS. Numerous previous attempts at using planes as weapons, intimate knowledge of terror plans called Project Bojinka, and knowledge of suspicious characters attending flight schools who were being monitored by the FBI make his utterance a clear lie on its face.

In the weeks before 9/11, the U.S. received warnings from all over the world that an event just like this was about to happen, but FBI investigations into suspected terrorists were suppressed and those warnings were deliberately disregarded.

* The names of the alleged hijackers, all ostensibly Muslims, were released to the public only hours after the attacks, despite Mueller saying we had no knowledge this would happen. This is an impossible twist of logic. If he didn't know of a plan to strike buildings with planes, how would he know the names of the hijackers? Various artifacts were discovered in strategic places to try to confirm the government's story, but these have all been dismissed as suspicious planting of evidence. Since that time several names on that list have turned up alive and well, living in Arab countries. Yet no attempt has ever been made to update the list. And why were none of these names on the airlines' passenger lists?

* Much like the invasion of Iraq, the anthrax attacks were designed to deflect attention from unanswered 9/11 questions in the patriotic pandemonium that followed the tragedy. In addition to making large amounts of money for the president's father and his friends from the hasty sale of inefficient drugs to a panicked populace, the investigation into these killings was abruptly halted when the trail of evidence led straight to the government's door, and has not been reopened. The anthrax attacks also amped up the climate of fear and deflected attention from the passage of the government's repressive Patriot Act.

* The Patriot Act was presented in the days after the tragedy supposedly as a response to it, yet it was clear that this heinous act, drafted to nullify provisions for freedom in the U.S. Constitution, was put together long before 9/11. In addition, testimony by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) revealed that most members of Congress were compelled to vote for the bill without even reading it. This was a vote to eliminate the Constitutional Bill of Rights, which has defined American freedom for 200 years, and it was accomplished when legislators voted for the bill without even reading it.

* The invasion of Afghanistan was presented as an attempt to pursue the alleged perpetrators of 9/11, yet it had been discussed for years prior to the tragedy and actually planned in the months before the attacks on New York and Washington. Statements by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Republican-written Project for a New American Century have stressed that America needed a formidable enemy to accomplish its aggressive geopolitical aims. The supposed enemy we attacked in Afghanistan was a diverse group of men from all over the world who were initially recruited, encouraged and supported by the American CIA.

* The hole in the Pentagon was not made by a jumbo jet. Damage to the building was simply not consistent with the size of the hole nor the absence of debris. At the supposed point of impact, a whole bank of windows remained unbroken and there were no marks on the lawn. No airplane debris (except what was planted on the lawn) nor remains of passengers were ever found.

* The president has admitted that he continued to read a story to schoolchildren in a Florida school for 30 minutes after being informed that two planes had struck New York and that the nation was under attack. He has never explained this puzzling behavior, nor how he saw the first plane hit. It was never televised, only recorded by a French crew filming firemen in New York. In that film, the plane in question does not appear to be a passenger airliner.

* The plane in Pennsylvania was shot down and broke apart in midair. No other explanation can account for the wreckage, which was spread over a six-mile area, or the eyewitness accounts that describe debris falling from the sky.

* Cellphone calls cannot be made from airliners in flight that are not close to the ground. As research by Professor A. K. Dewdney has shown, the emotional conversations between hijacked passengers and others would not have been possible under conditions that existed at that moment. These calls were cynical fabrications, exploiting the distraught emotions of those who lost loved ones.

* Radio communications from firefighters on the upper floors of the Trade Center towers clearly indicate that fires were under control and the structure was in no danger of collapsing.

These are merely a few of the deliberately false statements made by U.S. officials about 9/11. They provide crystal clear evidence that our president, his staff, and many legislators should be indicted on charges of treason, obstruction of justice and mass murder. Above all, these evil men should be removed from their positions of authority before they implement more of their moneymaking murder schemes like the one they are now perpetrating on the innocent people of Iraq.

Otherwise, we face a future of endless war abroad and merciless repression at home.

Consider just a few more of the other unanswered questions from among the thousands of unexplained loose ends that all point to 9/11 being an inside job.

* Who benefited from the suspiciously high numbers of put options purchased prior to September 11 for shares in companies whose stock prices subsequently plummeted, on the supposition that whoever was behind the hijacking was also behind most of the purchases of these put options? And what was the role of the new executive director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard, who handled these transactions?

* Why was the debris from the collapsed Twin Towers removed from the site with no forensic examination? Why was almost all of it sold to scrap merchants and shipped abroad where it would not be available for scientific examination?

* Why does the government refuse to release any transcripts of communications or any records at all relating to signals of any form transmitted by those jets?

* Why did so many people, from San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown to many employees of companies in the World Trade Center who failed to come to work that day, know in advance that something bad was going to happen on Sept. 11, 2001?

* Why do all the major U.S. media continue to act as if none of these questions is legitimate or relevant?

Today, millions of people around the world are protesting the criminal destruction of the nation of Iraq. But these protests won't change the number of minds necessary to stop America's criminal madmen from continuing with their genocidal aim of enslaving the entire world.

What WILL stop them is spreading the realization that President George W. Bush and his billionaire accomplices in the oil industry perpetrated 9/11 as an excuse to begin the militarization of America for the purpose of world conquest.

History has shown all too clearly the deceived American people WILL support the destruction of faraway countries on phony pretexts of defending so-called freedom.

Thus the needless wars continue. Right now we watch high-tech weapons slaughter the defenseless people of Iraq. Soon it will be Iran, Syria, Colombia, Venezuela, North Korea, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and who knows where else. All these misguided atrocities will be possible because of the hoax known as 9/11.

But the American people will not — and cannot — tolerate leaders who kill our own people merely to invent a pretext — the war on terror — to go around killing anyone they like.

If the American people DO tolerate such an insane strategy, then they clearly do not deserve to survive as a nation or a people.

More here: http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.htm

If you believe the official version of events, then you are one seriously deluded conspiracy theorist. Fact.

I don't know if this is a response to me or what. Even Donald Rumsfeld slipped and said that it was a missile that hit the pentagon. If you want to believe, as millions of Americans do, that even the laws of physics were suspended on 9-11 feel free. Be careful when you cook outdoors, lighter fluid in enough quantity will melt steel girders, so your grill is in danger. Airplane wings fold into small missile-sized holes and disappear. WTC building #7 collapses in fright and sympathy for the towers. Black boxes are atomized but "terrorist passports waft down among the debris to be found the next day.
Strange days indeed.

To believe that someone could possibly fabricate an airliner crashing into the Pentagon simply goes beyond. Do you believe in E.T. too?

The airliner did a wide loop, then almost clipped the building my company is in (top 12th floor, many witnesses there) and then into the Pentagon. I also talked to a receptionist on a top floor in Crystal City (just across from the Pentagon) who witnessed the whole thing.

An airline crashing into a structure like the Pentagon at full throttle would simply disintegrate in a fireball, but I'm sure there was plenty of plane debris scattered in the Courtyard (center of Pentagon).

But wait, I forgot that the FAA is controlled by Zog.

Get a grip and take some anti-schizoid medication.

Find the Boeing if you can.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

Still believe it evaporated into it's individual molecules and vanished into thin air?

Then...YOU ARE FUCKING HOPELESSLY RETARDED.

So all the witnesses seeing an airliner crashing into the Pentagon where actually seeing an Industrial Light and Magic hollagram?

A airliner consists of mostly an jet engine and empty hull. It has to be light to sustain air flight. An impact like that into what is a solid wall, coupled with jet fuel, would only leave bits and pieces left.

What happened to airliner in question and all it's occupants? Was the airline industry in cahoots with the conspiracy? The impact scene was immediately flooded with hundreds of state and federal emergency personel. Where all of them in on the conspiracy, or where they zapped with Zog's memory eliminator?

Not to mention every media outlet flooding the Pentagon crash scene, the Towers crash scene, and analysing Al-Quaeda's elaborate plot nine ways to Sunday. Don't you think that they might uncover this slight irregularity, such as the government orchestrating this whole thing?

The government can't do anything right, but they can come up with this?

So all the witnesses seeing an airliner crashing into the Pentagon where actually seeing an Industrial Light and Magic hollagram?

A airliner consists of mostly an jet engine and empty hull. It has to be light to sustain air flight. An impact like that into what is a solid wall, coupled with jet fuel, would only leave bits and pieces left.

What happened to airliner in question and all it's occupants? Was the airline industry in cahoots with the conspiracy? The impact scene was immediately flooded with hundreds of state and federal emergency personel. Where all of them in on the conspiracy, or where they zapped with Zog's memory eliminator?

Not to mention every media outlet flooding the Pentagon crash scene, the Towers crash scene, and analysing Al-Quaeda's elaborate plot nine ways to Sunday. Don't you think that they might uncover this slight irregularity, such as the government orchestrating this whole thing?

The government can't do anything right, but they can come up with this?


The government didn't do anything right on 9-11. That's why there's so much evidence that the whole thing was a poorly done hoax. A day after I was in disbelief, not because of the event, but because the two towers simply crashed to the ground. The whole thing stank to high heaven. If you care to enlighten yourself on what a murderous tyranny the USA is becoming, you can do so here: http://www.serendipity.li/wtc.htm

I have neither the time nor the inclination to debate people gullible enough to swallow the filthy lies and distortions the jewish media spews. I won't say ZOG because that is inadequate and cliched around here. The whole shebang is jew-infected and fucked for good.

If you cannot or will not accept that 9-11 was all a poorly done hoax to justify an endless "War on Terror", then that's your bidness. Sleep on. Though I cannot imagine what keeps you from accepting the obvious if not simply willful ignorance or an inability to understand that the gubmint is rotten to the core and will commit any atrocity to achieve it's ends.

In the end it really doesn't matter and it's all said and done anyway. I don't have a bone up my ass about the thing and could care less if lemmings and sheeple are dimwitted or ignorant enough to believe that two of the world's largest building simply crumble into a pile of rubble because of small holes near their tops or to imagine that planes disintegrate into dust when they hit Pentagons. If you cannot recognize a controlled demolition and a missile strike then fuck it.

Mr. Crowe has to turn his head. He can't face the gut-wrenching truth.
He, and most Americans, is like the child of a molester who loves his daddy and refuses to believe the evidence of his criminal betrayal. We can't force him to absorb any more than he is capable of. We can only leave the links to the horrible truth out for him to visit and take in as much as he can handle. Maybe hitlergoddess will nibble at it too.

Why would they use planes for the WTC and not the pentagon?


...

No matter which conspiracy theory you choose to believe in, the government one that requires you accept all the coincidences, or the antizog theory you find a group of disciplined people who planned big and went for the main chance. They are fallible.
According to government theory a group of angry muslim fanatics trained only to fly not to take off or land, they drank, whored and partied in the days before their mission but also left copies of the Koran. What the hell, it goes on and on.
If, as I think, Zionist traitors in all levels of our government nurtured and brought it about, then I will likely never know all the details, the whys and hows. They didn't pull off the perfect crime but they may get by with it, thanks in large part to it's stupendous nature that boggles belief in such as you.
Ever hear of the "Big Lie"?

Why would they use planes for the WTC and not the pentagon?


...

Why would they use planes for the WTC and not the pentagon?


...

The link I provided in my post is to a website called Serendipity. It has literally thousands of pages/links debunking not only 9-11 but many other aspects of the tyrannical Amerikwan government. It should be able to answer all your questions and then some.

I will say that the approach to the Pentagon would have been much more difficult for whoever would have been remote control piloting the vanishing Boeing 757-200 commercial airliner. Far more delicate an operation than simply getting the WTC tower in sight and nailing it broadside. Hence, a laser guided cruise missile.

You won't see that fat slob Moore get any closer to the truth. His vapid movie is just Bush-Bashing. The big fat buffoon is just as deluded as the morons who go to see his pathetic film when there's plenty of anti-Dubya stuff available free on the web. The half-truth that isn't half true lovers belief is always along the lines of "they knew before hand and let it happen because they needed a spectacle like Pearl Harbor to justify war". No, little lemming, the CIA/Mossad engineered it themselves and then did it. Stop defending your pathetic government and it's corruption.

If you're into nutty stuff like getting your hate on Dubya, you can go here:

http://www.hated.com/

Happy hunting.

P.S. And don't think you're leading me along to get some hilarious quotes about Idiot Man and his foot in his mouth and all the insane crap he says because he's such a goat. I know all about you.

The link I provided in my post is to a website called Serendipity. It has literally thousands of pages/links debunking not only 9-11 but many other aspects of the tyrannical Amerikwan government. It should be able to answer all your questions and then some.

Yes, I've learned alot from it. Good site.


No, little lemming, the CIA/Mossad engineered it themselves and then did it. Stop defending your pathetic government and it's corruption.


Sir, when have I done this? I was simply asking questions. No need to call me names.


P.S. And don't think you're leading me along to get some hilarious quotes about Idiot Man and his foot in his mouth and all the insane crap he says because he's such a goat. I know all about you.

???




...

Sir, when have I done this? I was simply asking questions. No need to call me names.


It was inadvertant. I was in an imaginary conversation with a hypothetical lemming. I had no intention of calling you a name. I (almost) never flame people, it's bad manners. Didn't mean to sound pedantic or wiser-than-thou. I get carried away and sometimes need to watch my tongue, or fingertips in this case. Sorry. No offense intended.

Nah, it's okay. Sometimes I do that as well, but I try to act relatively good mannered, too.


I think the only flaming I've done here was this was with that Pakistani over in opposition.



...

4,000 Israelis worked in the WTC on 9/10/2001. How may died? Anywhere from one to five. Account for that miraculous passover with any other reason than israeli foreknowlege. Odigo, does that ring a bell? dancing Israelis? 120-160 mossad agents arrested and then sent quietly home? Stock transactions done that morning predicated on the event? Mossad agents living next-door to the alleged "terrorists"?
If Israel knew of it then their Neoconservative fifth-columnist agents did, and if those handlers had foreknowlege then so did their stooge, Bush (insofar as they allowed it. You can tell by the Florida schoolroom video that he knew that it was "the big one". He didn't bat an eye when Andrew card told him of the second strike and Card didn't miss a stride waiting for a response he knew wasn't coming.)

The most damning thing about that classroom (or should I say that multi-racial shit pit?) video is not how bush sat there for several more minutes without doing anything after recieving the news. The most damning thing is the fact that the secret service agents did not intervene and carry bush to another location for safety. At about the same time that bush was in the classroom secret service agents barged into cheney's washington office and literally carried down the steps to the white house basement for safety. As we know, secret service agents dont wait around for orders from their boss; if they see eminent danger then they will react no matter what. Considering that agents were in the next room to the classroom where bush was watching the wtc collapse on television is enough to realize that bush and company not only knew what was going to happen but they also knew that they were safe right where they were.

The most damning thing about that classroom (or should I say that multi-racial shit pit?) video is not how bush sat there for several more minutes without doing anything after recieving the news. The most damning thing is the fact that the secret service agents did not intervene and carry bush to another location for safety. At about the same time that bush was in the classroom secret service agents barged into cheney's washington office and literally carried down the steps to the white house basement for safety. As we know, secret service agents dont wait around for orders from their boss; if they see eminent danger then they will react no matter what. Considering that agents were in the next room to the classroom where bush was watching the wtc collapse on television is enough to realize that bush and company not only knew what was going to happen but they also knew that they were safe right where they were.

No doubt the CIA boys knew that if any of those 3rd grader niglets made a move on Bush, that Dubya would kick the little nigger's ass all over the classroom. They deemed him safe and stood down.

Dubya goofed up when questioned about the day The United States Government attacked it's own people to cement Israel/US relations and justify a War on Terror.

Here's the excerpt.

QUESTION: One thing, Mr. President, is that you have no idea how much you've done for this country, and another thing is that how did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack?

BUSH: Well... (APPLAUSE)

Thank you, Jordan (ph).

Well, Jordan (ph), you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident."

But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

Hmm. That's strange. Either our mighty commander in thief had access to closed circuit footage of the first hit, or he really got the facts mixed up.

And commentary.
There is a problem with the above statement. There was no live video coverage of the first plane hitting the tower. There couldn't be. Video of that first plane hitting the tower did not surface until AFTER the second plane had hit.

Bush is lying through his teeth here.

Even though Bush is not a very good pilot (he was taken off of flight status for failure to take a medical exam which included a drug test), it would be silly to assume that a passenger jet hitting the WTC in clear weather was pilot error.

Strange anomaly on Boeing's Belly. Hrmmmmmm.
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/flight175explained.jpg

First Strike. Doesn't quite look like a Boeing 757-200. Too small.
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/spencer/incoming.jpg

And a good summation of the mass denial of logic and reason.

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."

---J. Edgar Hoover