Log in

View Full Version : Evolution of the White Race


John in Woodbridge
June 5th, 2004, 09:02 AM
Most whites, at least those not brainwashed by the controlled media, know that a segregated society (white nation state at best) is necessary to save their culture and way of life from the hordes of fire-breathing non-white parasites clawing their way into traditionally white countries and their natural attempt to gobble up superior white genetics.

Probably the biggest debate for white nationalists is who would be considered white, since the cutoff line is arbitrary and subjective. Aryan purists believe in genetic ticking time bombs, but I believe that has no basis in scientific fact. Also politically and strategically it makes sense to include everyone that is virtually white and not a threat to the white race (within reason).

This Nordic blonde would easily pass as white (true Nords are the white ideal).
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/alek1

Someone like Salma Hayek is where the distinction gets a little more confusing.
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/salma1.jpg

One rule of thumb is that individuals with ¼ to 1/8 of admixture or less could be considered white (1/16 or less for Negroid, since black genes are radically different than white and are dominant).

Another opinion is that if you look white, act white, and are generally accepted by the white community as white, then you are white.

Once a white nation state is constructed, then the natural evolution of the white race will begin once again, and these trace amounts of admixture will be diluted out in a few generations.

Note: Thanks to Renegade for some source material.

western-nationalist
June 5th, 2004, 11:08 PM
This Nordic blonde would easily pass as white (true Nords are the white ideal).

Explain to me why "true Nords" are the white ideal?.

John in Woodbridge
June 5th, 2004, 11:18 PM
I should probably rephrase that. I don't believe that true Nords are "more white" than Meds. It's just that blonde-haired, blue-eyed Nords get the pass from WN's with even the most extremist ideology.

http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/amy4.jpg

2TonicNight
June 17th, 2004, 12:03 PM
I should probably rephrase that. I don't believe that true Nords are "more white" than Meds. It's just that blonde-haired, blue-eyed Nords get the pass from WN's with even the most extremist ideology.


Have you seen some southern Meds? It's a fact, many are Octoroons. Same for many Spaniards, and let's not even talk about Portugal. The whites of Iberia and the Mediterrenean seperate themselves from their mongrelized brethren rather strenuously. Heck, Northern Italy wants to slough off the interbred south, and become a seperate country.

John in Woodbridge
June 17th, 2004, 05:24 PM
Have you seen some southern Meds? It's a fact, many are Octoroons. Same for many Spaniards, and let's not even talk about Portugal. The whites of Iberia and the Mediterrenean seperate themselves from their mongrelized brethren rather strenuously. Heck, Northern Italy wants to slough off the interbred south, and become a seperate country.

I wasn't aware of that, but I've never been Europe either. I seen plenty of pics of "borderliners" though. This is where the definition starts to get subjective.

Anima Eternae
June 17th, 2004, 07:56 PM
I have no idea why one would want to exlude most Italians from the definition of white. I realize there are some mongrels, especially sicilians....but still....

I lived in Italy for a while, and I'd say the VAST MAJORITY are white (monica belluci-ish meds).

http://www.adorocinema.com/personalidades/atores/monica-bellucci/monica-bellucci02.jpg

I lived in Greece too.....that was a bit more iffy, but there definately quite a bit...

Antiochus Epiphanes
June 17th, 2004, 08:18 PM
Oh man is she hot. Look at the proportions in her face, they are nearly ideal. Chisel her in marble and you'd have a classic.

She is an inspiring beauty. Ideal med type.

You guys may not like her but I think Nicole Kidman the ideal kelt.

Question is who do you nominate for the ideal nordic?

John in Woodbridge
June 17th, 2004, 08:42 PM
Question is who do you nominate for the ideal nordic?

She has to be up there on the list.

Kristanna Lokken
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/kristanna1.jpg

Shapur
June 18th, 2004, 10:07 AM
I have no idea why one would want to exlude most Italians from the definition of white. I realize there are some mongrels, especially sicilians....but still....

I lived in Italy for a while, and I'd say the VAST MAJORITY are white (monica belluci-ish meds).

http://www.adorocinema.com/personalidades/atores/monica-bellucci/monica-bellucci02.jpg

I lived in Greece too.....that was a bit more iffy, but there definately quite a bit...


Pure med:

http://www.angeltowns.com/members/racialreal/sub_mediterranean.jpg

Mediterranean: Short-statured, dolicho- and mesocephalic form found in Spain, Portugal, the western Mediterranean islands, and to some extent in North Africa, southern Italy, and other Mediterranean borderlands. Its purest present-day racial nucleus is without doubt Arabia. Most of the Cappadocian, isolated in the skeletal material, seems to have been absorbed into the western Mediterranean variety after its early Metal Age migration, while that which remained in Asia Minor became assimilated into the Dinaric and Armenoid. It still appears, however, among individuals in its original form, and is particularly common among Oriental Jews.

Abzug Hoffman
June 18th, 2004, 11:10 AM
She has to be up there on the list.

Kristanna Lokken
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/kristanna1.jpg

I suppose she is only one quarter nig.

Abzug Hoffman
June 18th, 2004, 11:19 AM
Pure med:

http://www.angeltowns.com/members/racialreal/sub_mediterranean.jpg

Mediterranean: Short-statured, dolicho- and mesocephalic form found in Spain, Portugal, the western Mediterranean islands, and to some extent in North Africa, southern Italy, and other Mediterranean borderlands. Its purest present-day racial nucleus is without doubt Arabia. Most of the Cappadocian, isolated in the skeletal material, seems to have been absorbed into the western Mediterranean variety after its early Metal Age migration, while that which remained in Asia Minor became assimilated into the Dinaric and Armenoid. It still appears, however, among individuals in its original form, and is particularly common among Oriental Jews.

Is supposed to be an Oriental Jew? Where is his beard? Jews had beards until the electric razor was invented. Show us the pic of the jew.

Shapur
June 18th, 2004, 11:34 AM
Is supposed to be an Oriental Jew? Where is his beard? Jews had beards until the electric razor was invented. Show us the pic of the jew.

I said she is not original so called Med.
She looks to me Aryanoid and not Mediterranoid!

Abzug Hoffman
June 18th, 2004, 12:21 PM
I said she is not original so called Med.
She looks to me Aryanoid and not Mediterranoid!

So far I have never seen a Jew identified as such in these old books. Which suggests to me the professor was either editing himself not to offend jews, or he was actually working for the jews to screw white peoples heads up. I think the latter, because these lists are just a bunch of Talmudic crap that are about as useful as the Kabballa.

Shapur
June 18th, 2004, 12:36 PM
So far I have never seen a Jew identified as such in these old books. Which suggests to me the professor was either editing himself not to offend jews, or he was actually working for the jews to screw white peoples heads up. I think the latter, because these lists are just a bunch of Talmudic crap that are about as useful as the Kabballa.

Man common. To say Semits are Meds is a laugh!
So you will say she looks like a so called Med?
We have enough genetical proofs that there is a so called Aryanoid race!
So what is she? Aryanoid or Semitic?

Fredrik Haerne
June 18th, 2004, 01:11 PM
Probably the biggest debate for white nationalists is who would be considered white, since the cutoff line is arbitrary and subjective.

Oh, no. But it is a big debate for those whose nationalist experience is only about typing away on the internet. Usually it's some black-haired guy posting an endless stream of pics of White-looking women he knows to be race-mixed so as to make everybody say "Gosh, that's fascinating, my world is turned upside down now!"

Shapur
June 18th, 2004, 01:38 PM
Oh, no. But it is a big debate for those whose nationalist experience is only about typing away on the internet. Usually it's some black-haired guy posting an endless stream of pics of White-looking women he knows to be race-mixed so as to make everybody say "Gosh, that's fascinating, my world is turned upside down now!"

What has hair color to do with race mixing?
Are Scandinvians racial pure because they have fair hairs?

Abzug Hoffman
June 18th, 2004, 01:55 PM
Man common. To say Semits are Meds is a laugh!
So you will say she looks like a so called Med?
We have enough genetical proofs that there is a so called Aryanoid race!
So what is she? Aryanoid or Semitic?

He looks Aryan European with some hook nosed Semite blood mixed in, which is what you find in the Mediterranean.

Shapur
June 18th, 2004, 03:47 PM
He looks Aryan European with some hook nosed Semite blood mixed in, which is what you find in the Mediterranean.

Who? Hook nosed is nothing semitic. Semtic is language group not a race!

Fredrik Haerne
June 18th, 2004, 04:29 PM
What has hair color to do with race mixing?
Are Scandinvians racial pure because they have fair hairs?

Aw, sorry if I stepped on your toes there. They are so dark, makes it hard to see them. :)

Abzug Hoffman
June 18th, 2004, 04:31 PM
Who? Hook nosed is nothing semitic. Semtic is language group not a race!

A group that you can tell does not come from Europe just by looking at them.

johnny yuma
June 18th, 2004, 06:39 PM
Kristanna Loken looks like Alyssa Milano. I don't think she's Nordic.

johnny yuma
June 18th, 2004, 06:55 PM
Here's your ideal Nordic.

Shapur
June 19th, 2004, 03:45 AM
Aw, sorry if I stepped on your toes there. They are so dark, makes it hard to see them. :)

About who you are speaking? :confused:
Here the purity of your so called nordish "race".
Nothern Swedish:
HG1: 23%
HG2: 48%
HG3: 19%
HG9: 2%
HG16: 8%
HG21: 2%
Gotlander:
HG1: 17%
HG2: 59%
HG3: 16%
HG16: 6%
HG26: 2%
Norwegian:
HG1: 29%
HG2: 33%
HG3: 31%
HG9: 2%
HG16: 4%
HG21: 2%


You are mixed! So what is on your so pure?

Cornish:
HG1: 82%
HG2: 18%

That is what I understand pure. Mostly to have only ONE HG!
Cornish is not pure but very near to be pure!


So what you are? A MIX

Shapur
June 19th, 2004, 03:56 AM
Btw here we Iranians:
HG2: 46%
HG9: 21%
HG21: 21%
HG12/26: 4%
HG3: 4%
HG1/22: 4%

:D

Fredrik Haerne
June 19th, 2004, 07:46 AM
You are mixed! So what is on your so pure?



"Wah wah, I hate you Whites, I must pretend I'm better than you and go on an internet campaign wasting countless hours doing it, wah wah." :cool:

Sorry boy, subhumans who have to shave the space between their eyes and their eyebrows, and shave off the tufts of thick, black hair growing out of their backs too, don't count as very desirable in mine or anybody else's book. Btw, learn some English, it's not so hard. At least not for an Aryan. But I forget, you subhumans are just Aryans mixed with the conquered races, as everybody knows. At least you are good for hating Jews and Arabs, I suppose.

Abzug Hoffman
June 19th, 2004, 04:19 PM
About who you are speaking? :confused:
Here the purity of your so called nordish "race".
Nothern Swedish:
HG1: 23%
HG2: 48%
HG3: 19%
HG9: 2%
HG16: 8%
HG21: 2%
Gotlander:
HG1: 17%
HG2: 59%
HG3: 16%
HG16: 6%
HG26: 2%
Norwegian:
HG1: 29%
HG2: 33%
HG3: 31%
HG9: 2%
HG16: 4%
HG21: 2%


You are mixed! So what is on your so pure?

Cornish:
HG1: 82%
HG2: 18%

That is what I understand pure. Mostly to have only ONE HG!
Cornish is not pure but very near to be pure!


So what you are? A MIX

Well, that would be very interesting Shapur, if Cornish people looked like they came from Iran. But they fucking don't. Cornish people look just llike white European people,and that is what they ARE and they don't need a blood test to know it. Michael J. Fox and Jayne Mansfield are listed on the famous Iranian people web site. No, excuse me, actually it's the famous Cornish people web site. There you go.

Anima Eternae
June 19th, 2004, 05:11 PM
The genes responsible for pure aesthetics are minute compared to the rest of the human genome. I thought most people here would be aware of that, considering they routinely blast celebrities who are "1/16 native american" and looks just as white as anyone else. ;)

Abzug Hoffman
June 19th, 2004, 07:31 PM
The genes responsible for pure aesthetics are minute compared to the rest of the human genome. I thought most people here would be aware of that, considering they routinely blast celebrities who are "1/16 native american" and looks just as white as anyone else. ;)

Yeah, that's why you can't be too careful.

Shapur
June 20th, 2004, 06:21 AM
"Wah wah, I hate you Whites, I must pretend I'm better than you and go on an internet campaign wasting countless hours doing it, wah wah." :cool:

Sorry boy, subhumans who have to shave the space between their eyes and their eyebrows, and shave off the tufts of thick, black hair growing out of their backs too, don't count as very desirable in mine or anybody else's book. Btw, learn some English, it's not so hard. At least not for an Aryan. But I forget, you subhumans are just Aryans mixed with the conquered races, as everybody knows. At least you are good for hating Jews and Arabs, I suppose.

LOL! I think my English is good enough to understand a non-Aryan like you.
Who conquered who this is the question my friend!
I showed you that there is genetical nothing pure.
Cornish people have only HG1/HG2. Other nations have many different HGs make this them unpure? So what is on north Europeans pure?
Genetical nothing, appearance? They adopted good the climate situation.
So what is on them pure? Befor you offend by a childish way you should learn more then one language"this is typical big mouthed nordish Jew!".
They say learn better English but they can only speak 1 language, but I can speak 5 languages and 3 of them perfect!
:D

Nordblod
June 20th, 2004, 08:22 AM
Yes, but they are all crap-languages that no-one else would want to learn anyway. Where are you from again?

Shapur
June 20th, 2004, 08:47 AM
Yes, but they are all crap-languages that no-one else would want to learn anyway. Where are you from again?

When you think that Persian, German and Italian is a crap-language then think so!

Nordblod
June 20th, 2004, 08:57 AM
Oops. That didn't pan out well. Ah, bugger it. They are all crap-languages.

Shapur
June 20th, 2004, 09:02 AM
Oops. That didn't pan out well. Ah, bugger it. They are all crap-languages.

LOL! Persian is used by 200 million people, German is THE language in Europe, Italian is not so much used but there are many old schoolary works on Italian.
So befor you tell German, Persian or Italian a crap-language begin to learn an other language beside English! LOL! :D

Nordblod
June 20th, 2004, 09:20 AM
I won't ever admit to being at fault, so you may as well save your breath (or finger joints, to be precise).

Fredrik Haerne
June 20th, 2004, 11:41 AM
LOL! I think my English is good enough to understand a non-Aryan like you.


*ROTFLOL*
You're good for a few laughs, kind of like a nigger dancing with blackface and bulging eyes. Well, if I don't fit your definition of Aryan, then noone would want to fit it. Whatever you call your mongrelized genetic composition won't make it any more desirable, no matter how you try, whereas my genes are sought after by the world. Nice try, subhuman. But it's unheard of for the non-White races to envy and hate Iranians for their beauty and success, since no such exists, whereas we Whites are envied and hated for what we are by every little failed darkling race, be it mongrelized or not.

Still, mudboys like you have their uses; it's always good when the darklings quarrel among themselves. As long as they don't forget their place: I have heard Arabs say they are White, which is just as preposterous as if you'd hear it from any other kind of mongrels, such as, say, Iranians. Now that's just not kosher.

Velademir
July 5th, 2004, 03:06 PM
All the Nordic are barbaric half human race. You guys an't no Aryan, NO European is ever an Aryans. Aryans are Irano-Afghan race! Period! The Nordic subhuman and other Barbaric monkeys are a joke when the claim to be Aryans! Bring facts about you being Aryans, it was in 19 century when you barbaric sub animals heard the word "Aryan" and Pure race and claim to be one.




I am Dariush, the Great King, the King of Kings
The King of many countries and many peoples
The King of this expansive land, the son of Wishtasp Achamenia
Persian, the son of a Persian, 'Aryan', from the Aryan Race

Dariush's scripture in Naqshe-e-Rostam

A passage from old Iranian prayer:


ATHRO AHURAE MAZDAO PUTHRA

O Fire Son of Ahura Mazda,

AIRYANAM KHARENO MAZDA DHATANAM !

In you shines the Glory of the Aryans, created by Mazda !


In the Fravardin Yasht, we remember and revere our holy ancestors. We take the name of Gaya Marethan (Gayomard) first, the first man on earth:



"We revere the Fravashi (immortal soul) of righteous Gaya Marethan

Yo pairyo Ahurai Mazdai manascha gushta sasnaoscha -

Who first heard (gushta) Ahura Mazda's intentions (manascha)

and commands (sasnaoscha),

Yahmat hacha frathveresat nafo Aryanam Dakhyunam,

Who lead, who fixed the lineage (nafo) of the Aryan Countries,

Chithrem Aryanam Dakhyunam -

He was the Seed, the Origin of the Aryan Countries!"


King Cyrus inscribed on stone, "I am an Aryan, son of an Aryan."


When Irano-Afghan Aryan race where glorifing their Aryan race, your nordic forefather were hanging from trees like Negeers! :D



The funny part is you worship a Semtic Jew--Jesus and claim to be "White" ahahahahah


*ROTFLOL*
You're good for a few laughs, kind of like a nigger dancing with blackface and bulging eyes. Well, if I don't fit your definition of Aryan, then noone would want to fit it. Whatever you call your mongrelized genetic composition won't make it any more desirable, no matter how you try, whereas my genes are sought after by the world. Nice try, subhuman. But it's unheard of for the non-White races to envy and hate Iranians for their beauty and success, since no such exists, whereas we Whites are envied and hated for what we are by every little failed darkling race, be it mongrelized or not.

Still, mudboys like you have their uses; it's always good when the darklings quarrel among themselves. As long as they don't forget their place: I have heard Arabs say they are White, which is just as preposterous as if you'd hear it from any other kind of mongrels, such as, say, Iranians. Now that's just not kosher.

Velademir
July 5th, 2004, 03:18 PM
The Origins of the European Race
As we all know, Aryans originated in the Arctic regions above Central Asia and from there migrated south to the steppes and then on to Iran, where they finally settled. And since the late 19th century, European racialists have believed that they were the "true Aryans". But for a long time, anthropologists argued against this myth, stating that Europeans are descended from Cro-Magnon Man, who migrated to Europe from Africa. New research supports this valid argument and debunks the claims made by ignorant European racialists:

EDINBURGH, Scotland - Modern Europeans, and maybe populations in other parts of the world, are descended from no more than a few hundred Africans who left their homeland as recently as 25,000 years ago, new research suggests.

The findings, reported at the start of a conference of the Human Genome Organization, the international collaboration researching the genetic makeup of the human race, provide the first estimate of how many people founded Europe.

They are also a blow to the theory that modern humans evolved simultaneously in Africa, Europe and Asia from multiple early humans.

"I think this certainly rules that out, at least in respect to Europe," said study leader Eric Lander, director of the Whitehead Institute/Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Genome Research. "We're not sure whether this was just the founding of Europe or whether, in fact, this small bottleneck represents all the people leaving Africa."

Lander's study involved comparing about 300 chromosomes from people in Sweden, central Europe and Nigeria. The differences in the genetic pattern between the European and African chromosomes revealed how long ago Europeans left Africa and about how many there must have been.

The pattern showed that the Europeans were descended from fewer ancestors than the Africans -- an evolutionary bottleneck, Lander said.

"It's hundreds, not thousands," Lander said.

The Nigerian chromosomes had been well shuffled around, which indicates a wide gene pool and a long breeding history, while the European chromosomes had long stretches of unshuffled genetic material, indicating a much smaller number of chromosome types entering the mix.

Eddy Rubin, a scientist who was not involved in the study, said he thinks the findings are accurate.

"The evidence is overwhelming that present-day Europeans come from a very small group that stayed small for a while, then expanded," said Rubin, head of the human genome center at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory at the University of California, Berkeley.

Lander said the findings had much broader applications.

"We are going to be able to do this throughout much of the rest of the world. The data will be able to rule it in or out for the other populations very quickly," Lander said.

"We're still in the early days for this, but it is remarkable how much the human chromosomes can be read as a history book," he continued. "We are going to be able to say how populations are related to each other, when people arrived there and how many people likely arrived in different places."

The human race numbers 6 billion people today, but it largely has the genetic variation of a population of a few tens of thousands, Lander said.

"We really are a tiny species grown large in the blink of an eye," he said.






With the exception of Greeks, and Italians----Latinos(not South Americans!) all other Europeans are related to Neggers!! :D




All the Nordic are barbaric half human race. You guys an't no Aryan, NO European is ever an Aryans. Aryans are Irano-Afghan race! Period! The Nordic subhuman and other Barbaric monkeys are a joke when the claim to be Aryans! Bring facts about you being Aryans, it was in 19 century when you barbaric sub animals heard the word "Aryan" and Pure race and claim to be one.




I am Dariush, the Great King, the King of Kings
The King of many countries and many peoples
The King of this expansive land, the son of Wishtasp Achamenia
Persian, the son of a Persian, 'Aryan', from the Aryan Race

Dariush's scripture in Naqshe-e-Rostam

A passage from old Iranian prayer:


ATHRO AHURAE MAZDAO PUTHRA

O Fire Son of Ahura Mazda,

AIRYANAM KHARENO MAZDA DHATANAM !

In you shines the Glory of the Aryans, created by Mazda !


In the Fravardin Yasht, we remember and revere our holy ancestors. We take the name of Gaya Marethan (Gayomard) first, the first man on earth:



"We revere the Fravashi (immortal soul) of righteous Gaya Marethan

Yo pairyo Ahurai Mazdai manascha gushta sasnaoscha -

Who first heard (gushta) Ahura Mazda's intentions (manascha)

and commands (sasnaoscha),

Yahmat hacha frathveresat nafo Aryanam Dakhyunam,

Who lead, who fixed the lineage (nafo) of the Aryan Countries,

Chithrem Aryanam Dakhyunam -

He was the Seed, the Origin of the Aryan Countries!"


King Cyrus inscribed on stone, "I am an Aryan, son of an Aryan."


When Irano-Afghan Aryan race where glorifing their Aryan race, your nordic forefather were hanging from trees like Negeers! :D



The funny part is you worship a Semtic Jew--Jesus and claim to be "White" ahahahahah

Velademir
July 5th, 2004, 03:36 PM
19th century European theories about the origins of race, were clearly eurocentric. Mind you before Sarmatians and before there was such a thing as recorded history outside Mesopotamia and Egypt.

Chrisitan European bshit mentality where like this:

Hmm... yes, glorious ancient civilizations here, urrr... yes... they must have come from Europe, Aryans? Yes, umm... that was us... claiming Europians christian monkeys to be Aryan is a joke!

Nordblod
July 6th, 2004, 07:28 AM
This may come as a terrible shock to you, but onomastic myopia is not exactly the most signifying intellectual trait of the serious WN. Neither is giving credence to the masturbatorily and implicitly self-aggrandizing slander of a few envious semites, be they swarthy or no.

Intrepid
July 6th, 2004, 03:43 PM
Nordblod, don't you see what they're attempting to do? Thee dusky Shapur has brought in his ally. Yes, none other than the Crimean Tatar under the guise of Velademir. This wiley creature will stoop lower than an Aztec under a conquistadore's boot. That is, to emendate his "HG" theories, of course.

Tread carefully, for the plains of Balaklava have valleys, indeed. The "jaws of Death" or "mouth of hell" were not kind to your 600 predecessors, nor will they be to you. Pay heed, I say, pay heed.

Nordblod
July 6th, 2004, 09:44 PM
Nordblod, don't you see what they're attempting to do? Thee dusky Shapur has brought in his ally. Yes, none other than the Crimean Tatar under the guise of Velademir. This wiley creature will stoop lower than an Aztec under a conquistadore's boot. That is, to emendate his "HG" theories, of course.

Tread carefully, for the plains of Balaklava have valleys, indeed. The "jaws of Death" or "mouth of hell" were not kind to your 600 predecessors, nor will they be to you. Pay heed, I say, pay heed.


I get the distinct impression that you are being a mite jocular. I find this highly inappropriate.

Intrepid
July 6th, 2004, 11:17 PM
Perhaps you're correct, Nordblod. However, with that being said, Shapur's rage now knows no bounds. His grandiloquent theories are being denounced throughout academia. He's truly at a breaking point. He ventured here, in search of kindred spirits, and was treated in an indecorous fashion. So his assault upon the West has begun in earnest. All known Western figureheads - at least those who are dissentient with "HG" - are to be silenced. Here, a member of his Hamburg cell is demonstrating their eternal vigilance against such spokesmen:

http://www.ananova.com/images/web/46837.jpg

They give no quarter, nor expect any in return. Ruthless as they are, the "HG" Jihad makes resistance seem futile. Rather akin to the savage's first impression of the Roman phalanx. With their superoir blood-lines, at least compared to mere Northern Europeans, how can their insidious plans be scuppered? There is more information forthcoming on Shapur's activities. Alas, it wouldn't be prudent for me to release such vital revelations until confirmed.

Suffice it to say, one intelligence report concerns Goteborg harbor.

Nordblod
July 6th, 2004, 11:31 PM
You wicked wicked scoundrel! Have you been checking my IP?

Intrepid
July 6th, 2004, 11:53 PM
You wicked wicked scoundrel! Have you been checking my IP?

No, of course not? How dare you accuse my of such a nefarious deed! What unmitigated gall you exhibit. After all, I'm only trying to assist your nation, as it were. Shapur's vainglorious junta will stop at nothing to silence his critics. You, as if you hadn't noticed, are in his cross-hairs. I'm simply not in immediate danger, if only because of proximity alone.

I doubt I will now share these facts with you as they arise.

Vivaodio
July 9th, 2004, 12:30 PM
Most whites, at least those not brainwashed by the controlled media, know that a segregated society (white nation state at best) is necessary to save their culture and way of life from the hordes of fire-breathing non-white parasites clawing their way into traditionally white countries and their natural attempt to gobble up superior white genetics.

Probably the biggest debate for white nationalists is who would be considered white, since the cutoff line is arbitrary and subjective. Aryan purists believe in genetic ticking time bombs, but I believe that has no basis in scientific fact. Also politically and strategically it makes sense to include everyone that is virtually white and not a threat to the white race (within reason).

This Nordic blonde would easily pass as white (true Nords are the white ideal).
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/alek1

Someone like Salma Hayek is where the distinction gets a little more confusing.
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/salma1.jpg

One rule of thumb is that individuals with ¼ to 1/8 of admixture or less could be considered white (1/16 or less for Negroid, since black genes are radically different than white and are dominant).

Another opinion is that if you look white, act white, and are generally accepted by the white community as white, then you are white.

Once a white nation state is constructed, then the natural evolution of the white race will begin once again, and these trace amounts of admixture will be diluted out in a few generations.

Note: Thanks to Renegade for some source material.



Salma Hayek is NOT White. She's far from it. She's half Mexican and half Lebanese, do you know what the chances are that both of her parent's happened to be pure White in those two notoriously non-White countries? WTF is all this "pan-Aryan" bulshit about? The woman is clearly not a White person. If she showed up at a White rally she'd be stared out the door. I trust my eyes and my instincts, and they tell me that that woman is not my ilk, no way in hell.

There's a big difference between this:
http://us.ent4.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/venice/venice_film_festival_2003_photos/salma_hayek/venice4.jpg


And this:

http://us.ent4.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/new_line_cinema/blow/penelope_cruz/blowpre4.jpg


Penelope Cruz is a beautiful Spanish White woman, Salma Hayek is a mud, how hard is that to understand?

John in Woodbridge
July 9th, 2004, 10:33 PM
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/penelope3.jpg

She's white.