Log in

View Full Version : avatar for KATIEW thread


T.Garrett
October 12th, 2007, 07:30 PM
Let's have some competition and good, clean fun in our opp forum VNNer's.

Create and post an avatar in this thread that you think fits our foulmouthed opp forum jewess, KATIEW since she is so reluctant to put up her pic.

The winning entry will be chosen by consensus in this thread ...the only thing I ask is no overt XXX pornographic overtones in the image as this violates forum policy.

It must be 120 X 120 pixels in size ...give your creative talents full reign members, let Katie know what you think of her and her smarmy tribe in a little graphic image which will be the mark she will henceforth wear and be known by on our forum.

Cheers!

Dawn
October 12th, 2007, 08:41 PM
http://chickenshop.co.uk/acatalog/halloween/smlimg/SM23153sm.jpg

Or this.

http://ninepointdesign.com/images/royals/mecha_streisand.jpg


I can't decide which is more grotesque.

MikeTodd
October 12th, 2007, 08:48 PM
She's a cutie!lol!
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/2636/wildenstein8ylne8.jpg

Chris 14
October 12th, 2007, 09:42 PM
All this avatar needs is a "Trust Me" on the bottom.:D

http://www.fembio.org/images/FB-bella-abzug-2.jpg

Pastor Visser
October 12th, 2007, 11:04 PM
http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/8211/katieweu6.jpg

birdman77
October 12th, 2007, 11:30 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Monica_lewinsky.jpg (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Monica_lewinsky.jpg)
TRUST ME !!

T.Garrett
October 12th, 2007, 11:57 PM
:krofl:krofl:krofl

Angst
October 13th, 2007, 03:03 AM
http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/7899/madelinenr4.jpg

I always thought the jewess, Madeline Albright, looked like a pig.

sean(doc)martin
October 13th, 2007, 03:20 AM
http://i24.tinypic.com/2cicglu.jpg

http://i23.tinypic.com/ejafq.jpg

http://i23.tinypic.com/11tag06.jpg


Edit: Visser I posted the pics before I saw yours. Great minds think alike.

Starr
October 13th, 2007, 03:24 AM
http://i24.tinypic.com/2cicglu.jpg

http://i23.tinypic.com/ejafq.jpg

http://i23.tinypic.com/11tag06.jpg

God, I dispise this filthy nasty ugly whore. The queen of degenerate, low brow piss and shit humor. Typical of so much wrong in our culture today.

sean(doc)martin
October 13th, 2007, 03:38 AM
I saw a commercial on CC where she was licking a Dog's back parts to see why dogs lick themselves. Raunchy Jewish chick. I imagine she would be the perfect avatar for any Jewess a person didn't like.

Starr
October 13th, 2007, 03:41 AM
I saw a commercial on CC where she was licking a Dog's back parts to see why dogs lick themselves. Raunchy Jewish chick. I imagine she would be the perfect avatar for any Jewess a person didn't like.

Too bad it wasn't a rabid pit bull that went for her jugular.

I have been feeling an intense dislike lately for everyone who promotes the filth and decay in the "anything goes" culture. It gets worse everyday. Hard core religious fundamentalism would even be slightly preferable to this. at least it would clean up the sewage.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 13th, 2007, 08:59 AM
Oh boy, this sounds like it'll be a gas! (eh, pardon the expression, Tappan Twat ;))...

I'll have to do some googling, but in the meantime, here's a little something that our royal cuntess should take into consideration:

http://www.revmod.ca/stfu.jpg

Robert W. Hoffman
October 13th, 2007, 09:32 AM
How about using one of her wedding pics?

Hell, Bridezillas ain't got nothing on ol' Katiekike (aka Hogzilla). Here's the bride-to-be on her big day:

http://www.adpunch.org/images/freschello-pig_25.jpg

Angst
October 13th, 2007, 10:54 AM
How about using one of her wedding pics?

Hell, Bridezillas ain't got nothing on ol' Katiekike (aka Hogzilla). Here's the bride-to-be on her big day:

http://www.adpunch.org/images/freschello-pig_25.jpgThere she is!!!!!

KatieW, we meet at last! :[]

MikeTodd
October 13th, 2007, 12:58 PM
Is there a better match for Katiekike:[]
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/2269/sarahsilverman11tp3.jpgThan FARTMAN:[]!!!
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/1238/2222365mj2.jpg
:krofl:krofl:krofl

Michael S. Burks
October 13th, 2007, 01:33 PM
http://pyropus.ca/personal/pets/lizzie-jane/20030216-rats-lizzie-n-jane1.jpg

Trust me[/

T.Garrett
October 13th, 2007, 03:50 PM
How about using one of her wedding pics?

Hell, Bridezillas ain't got nothing on ol' Katiekike (aka Hogzilla). Here's the bride-to-be on her big day:

http://www.adpunch.org/images/freschello-pig_25.jpg

Hoax!! Where have ya been buddy?

VNN's kike stompin funnyman leaves his callin card in a thread dedicated to talmudtwat, figures ...:D:D:D

Dayum, glad to see yer still alive and kickin man!

G

1st Edu
October 13th, 2007, 04:41 PM
lol :krofl

How about using one of her wedding pics?

Hell, Bridezillas ain't got nothing on ol' Katiekike (aka Hogzilla). Here's the bride-to-be on her big day:

http://www.adpunch.org/images/freschello-pig_25.jpg

Oprichniki
October 13th, 2007, 05:09 PM
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/a/a9/Gi-jew-movie.jpg/300px-Gi-jew-movie.jpg

Hexe
October 13th, 2007, 06:14 PM
http://i22.tinypic.com/2hn2ed2.jpg

KATIEW
October 15th, 2007, 12:49 PM
Let's have some competition and good, clean fun in our opp forum VNNer's.

Create and post an avatar in this thread that you think fits our foulmouthed opp forum jewess, KATIEW since she is so reluctant to put up her pic.

The winning entry will be chosen by consensus in this thread ...the only thing I ask is no overt XXX pornographic overtones in the image as this violates forum policy.

It must be 120 X 120 pixels in size ...give your creative talents full reign members, let Katie know what you think of her and her smarmy tribe in a little graphic image which will be the mark she will henceforth wear and be known by on our forum.

Cheers!

Foulmouthed? Huh? You invented that, garret. Gosh darn, you are soooo good at it.

And, BTW, I noticed you changed your avatar flexing the 'ole muscles. :krofl:krofl:krofl

How insecure you are that you resort to doing that, old man. What are you, pushing 60? And you cover your face with a friggin beard so most of your ugly mug is concealed. Better that way. I've seen your kind many, many times over, and it makes me giggle!

LET THE GAMES BEGIN!!!! Let's choose katie's avatar. I'm havin' a blast!:rofl

Michael S. Burks
October 15th, 2007, 12:54 PM
Here is the type of men that Katie likes.
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/ATA/7539M~The-Three-Stooges-Moe-Posters.jpg

T.Garrett
October 15th, 2007, 01:50 PM
Foulmouthed? Huh? You invented that, garret. Gosh darn, you are soooo good at it.

And, BTW, I noticed you changed your avatar flexing the 'ole muscles. :krofl:krofl:krofl

How insecure you are that you resort to doing that, old man. What are you, pushing 60? And you cover your face with a friggin beard so most of your ugly mug is concealed. Better that way. I've seen your kind many, many times over, and it makes me giggle!
Do you realize how many posts you've made so far about my avatars :krofl

No, actually I'm closer to 70 but who's counting hahaha ...what makes me laugh is that joo take all of this soo seriously, you would think after working for the adl covering VNNF all these years you would just take WN's and their dislike of jews in stride and just do your job being a paid fink.

Lets see your pic ya slimey whore, as I said you dont have the nerve :D

Dawn
October 15th, 2007, 01:59 PM
Um, Katie? Ever think about waxing?

http://cdn.davesdaily.com/pictures/756-ugly-face.jpg

Live Free
October 15th, 2007, 02:15 PM
I don't know what the katiedog looks like, but Dawn I think you've posted the epitome of jew femaledom.

Thanks a lot, Dawn. Now I gotta go scrub my eyeballs.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 15th, 2007, 03:44 PM
Hoax!! Where have ya been buddy?

VNN's kike stompin funnyman leaves his callin card in a thread dedicated to talmudtwat, figures ...:D:D:D

Dayum, glad to see yer still alive and kickin man!

G"...alive and kickin" kike and mud ass...

but, on with the fun, TG -- wutcha say? :D

Robert W. Hoffman
October 15th, 2007, 03:51 PM
Foulmouthed?


And you cover your face with a friggin beard so most of your ugly mug is concealed. Better that way. I've seen your kind many, many times over, and it makes me giggle!

Speaking of "mouths", Tappan Twat, how is that you're able to cram both your gunboats into your yap over and over again?! Seriously...

http://photos.poland.pl/gal/145/49/127/med.jpg



Oops! huh, Katiekike? :o

Robert W. Hoffman
October 15th, 2007, 04:08 PM
Lets see your pic ya slimey whore, as I said you dont have the nerve :DYeah, Tappan Twat, let's see a pic of that self-described "adorable button nose" and...what was it?..."hot ass"? you have...

Come on, puddin', I'll bet every jew male reading this is sitting at his computer with his pants around his ankles and a box of Kleenex at the ready.

don't be a pricktease...


:rolleyes:

Robert W. Hoffman
October 15th, 2007, 04:36 PM
Foulmouthed? Huh? You invented that, garret. Gosh darn, you are soooo good at it.

Just one more thing Tappan Twat and I'll let up bitch-slapping you all over Opp (for today that is...Lol!):

Just who the fuck do you think you're fooling, you hyper-neurotic jew cunt, with the "Gosh darn" in your post deriding my favorite mod for his "foul mouth?" YOU possess the filthiest mouth of any female -- goy, nigger, or kike -- who's ever posted on this forum. Not just Opp, mind you, but the entire forum (as anyone who's read but a handful of your lame attempts at humor will attest to).

Nice try, oven-ash...wanna try again? I mean, cramming someone else's foot in your over-sized yap -- seeing as how you've already managed to insert both of yours into that gaping, smelly hole of yours. Ehh, the other hole, stupid -- the one between your ears. (I'm telling ya, folks -- this is one dumb bitch. Ka-riste!)

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:08 PM
Just one more thing Tappan Twat and I'll let up bitch-slapping you all over Opp (for today that is...Lol!):

Just who the fuck do you think you're fooling, you hyper-neurotic jew cunt, with the "Gosh darn" in your post deriding my favorite mod for his "foul mouth?" YOU possess the filthiest mouth of any female -- goy, nigger, or kike -- who's ever posted on this forum. Not just Opp, mind you, but the entire forum (as anyone who's read but a handful of your lame attempts at humor will attest to).


Nice try, oven-ash does that mean we Jews were put in ovens???...wanna try again? I mean, cramming someone else's foot in your over-sized yap -- seeing as how you've already managed to insert both of yours into that gaping, smelly hole of yours. Ehh, the other hole, stupid -- the one between your ears. (I'm telling ya, folks -- this is one dumb bitch. Ka-riste!)

Firstly, get over yourself,wabbit boy. You are a mental midget :krofl. I speak on this forum in the language that is used (over your head, aye?). In my private life, , I do not use this kind of language. Believe me or not. You peope "inspire" me to be foul, especially your favorite mod.;)

Secondly, I did not ask for your advice, goyboy. I responded to garrett. SPEAK TO THE HAND! I don't want to speak with you again, got it? You are a waste of time and space in the universe. Boy, were I but a fly on the wall when you meet you Maker/Creator.

Thirdly, you like to call women bitches, dontcha? Yeah, that is a white trash thing to do, "ain't it"? You make me laugh. Your posts to me are sooo out there, how will you ever find yer way back?

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:12 PM
Yeah, Tappan Twat, let's see a pic of that self-described "adorable button nose" and...what was it?..."hot ass"? you have...

Come on, puddin', I'll bet every jew male reading this is sitting at his computer with his pants around his ankles and a box of Kleenex at the ready.

don't be a pricktease...


:rolleyes:

Neh, you certainly don't need my adorable pic to jerk off to. You definately peruse your young girl porn EVERY DAY (during working hours???), so go to Costco as they have huge supplies of kleenex at low cost. You need it. Or maybe, yer the kind of WT that uses his fingers afterwards? :rofl:krofl

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:13 PM
Speaking of "mouths", Tappan Twat, how is that you're able to cram both your gunboats into your yap over and over again?! Seriously...

http://photos.poland.pl/gal/145/49/127/med.jpg



Oops! huh, Katiekike? :o

Cute! can you find out who he is? Maybe he is single ;)

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:15 PM
Um, Katie? Ever think about waxing?

http://cdn.davesdaily.com/pictures/756-ugly-face.jpg

That a pic of you, honey. Say, the tongue will not help get the guys ;) Put it back in yer mouth. :krofl:krofl:krofl

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:19 PM
Do you realize how many posts you've made so far about my avatars :krofl

No, actually I'm closer to 70 but who's counting hahaha ...what makes me laugh is that joo take all of this soo seriously, you would think after working for the adl covering VNNF all these years you would just take WN's and their dislike of jews in stride and just do your job being a paid fink.

Lets see your pic ya slimey whore, as I said you dont have the nerve :D

Two posts about your damn avatar.

Do I take this forum seriously? Do most of my posts seem serious to you?

Dayam! While I write I laugh to myself, that is how seriously I take y'all.

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:20 PM
http://i22.tinypic.com/2hn2ed2.jpg

I like this one. Where did you get it? I can actually use it on Jewish forums. Too cute!

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:27 PM
http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/8211/katieweu6.jpg

I don't know about you, but I think Sarah Silverman is hilarious!!!! Not to mention very pretty. So, thanks. She makes a hell of a lot of moolah doing her antics, dontcha think?

KATIEW
October 16th, 2007, 03:28 PM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Monica_lewinsky.jpg (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Monica_lewinsky.jpg)
TRUST ME !!

She is pretty, so thanks, WT

Robert W. Hoffman
October 16th, 2007, 05:28 PM
Cute! can you find out who he is? Maybe he is single ;)Unless you're still in Pampers, Katiekike, I seriously doubt he'd show much interest in you. You see, he's a student of the Talmud and he likes his "women" crawling on all fours (and I ain't talking doggy-style, Toots...know what I mean? *nudge nudge* ;)).

So unless you're still shitting yellow, I doubt you'll as much as a second look from this fine-looking fellow.

Whoops! almost forgot: :krofl:krofl:krofl

psychologicalshock
October 16th, 2007, 05:29 PM
Two posts about your damn avatar.

Do I take this forum seriously? Do most of my posts seem serious to you?

Dayam! While I write I laugh to myself, that is how seriously I take y'all.

You wont go away, that's for sure.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 16th, 2007, 05:35 PM
I don't know about you, but I think Sarah Silverman is hilarious!!!! Not to mention very pretty. So, thanks. She makes a hell of a lot of moolah doing her antics, dontcha think?'scuse me, Tappan Twat but, didn't I hear this "hilarious" jewess of yours saying something about (now get this, folks) "licking her dog's ass" in a promo for her show?

ROFL!! Hell, you're right: she is indeed "hilarious!" Stop! I'm gonna bust a gut! :krofl :krofl :krofl

:rolleyes:

Starr
October 16th, 2007, 05:39 PM
Sarah Silverman is a trashy gutter tramp. Her type of antics only appeal to the lowest elements in a society that no longer has a bottom.

who wants to look at this nasty whore grab her filthy shithole? Deport her to some Islamic nation and let some hard core Mullahs do what they will with her.

McKinley
October 16th, 2007, 05:54 PM
Sarah Silverman is a trashy gutter tramp. Her type of antics only appeal to the lowest elements in a society that no longer has a bottom.

who wants to look at this nasty whore grab her filthy shithole? Deport her to some Islamic nation and let some hard core Mullahs do what they will with her.

I saw that thing on the vitz one time. What a repulsive slut.

I bet Katie is just as ugly. Oh, she already said she was uglier then the slut.


Shivers from holding back cookies.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 16th, 2007, 05:59 PM
Firstly, get over yourself,wabbit boy. You are a mental midget :krofl.

You make me laugh.
Just two quick points, Tappan Twat and I'll let you fester for a few days...

1) Calling me "wabbit boy" and a "mental midget" merits a :krofl??? That's funny to you?! (I hate to over-emphasize this, folks but it truly says something about this jewess's "sense of humor"...or serious lack of).

and 2) No, I don't make you laugh. You absolutely loathe the way I humiliate you and would give anything -- anything -- if I just simply vanished from this forum for good. And that, Petunia, warms my heart like you couldn't imagine -- knowing that I get under you're fetid, liver-spotted skin.



ciao for now, Toots

Robert W. Hoffman
October 16th, 2007, 06:28 PM
While I write I laugh to myself, that is how seriously I take y'all.I'm curious...

Do you really expect people to believe, after the way you get humiliated here time and again, that you're actually "laughing" as you write your posts? For once I'm being 100% serious...

Well, do you? I'd really like to know...

odin
October 16th, 2007, 08:31 PM
While I write I laugh to myselfThat's understandable. We laugh at your writing too.

birdman77
October 16th, 2007, 09:22 PM
) No, I don't make you laugh. You absolutely loathe the way I humiliate you and would give anything -- anything -- if I just simply vanished from this forum for good. And that, Petunia, warms my heart like you couldn't imagine -- knowing that I get under you're fetid, liver-spotted skin. [quote]

she is only laughing because jewess-shrews love hardcore humiliation.
kikes are filthy creatures, who make niggers look decent.

ngrh8r
October 16th, 2007, 10:15 PM
I'm curious...

Do you really expect people to believe, after the way you get humiliated here time and again, that you're actually "laughing" as you write your posts? For once I'm being 100% serious...

Well, do you? I'd really like to know...


She's pretty fucking dumb for a Jew, huh?

I love the way she continually tries to insult our intelligence by using poor grammar, spelling and punctuation. I feel so very inferior. :rolleyes:

Starr nailed it when she said that Katie is helping our cause. What I wouldn't give for a million more inarticulate kikes like her who are outspoken about their hate for Gentiles, while at the same time they help to destroy the myth of Jews as peaceful, open minded and intelligent.

T.Garrett
October 16th, 2007, 11:39 PM
Sarah Silverman is a trashy gutter tramp. Her type of antics only appeal to the lowest elements in a society that no longer has a bottom.
and whose control of the social discourse in America led to this disgusting state of affairs? nah, not jews ...:D

I honestly didnt even have a clue who this jewish skank sarah silverman was until I saw this thread ...what kind of woman scratches her sphincter hole in public for laffs ...only a jewess :puke:

who wants to look at this nasty whore grab her filthy shithole? Deport her to some Islamic nation and let some hard core Mullahs do what they will with her.
LOL ...why do ya think the tribe is in such an uproar over the Muzzies? They well know that they would never have the 'freedom' in a world controlled by Muslims to go up on a stage, drop their pants and take a shit in public and have people laugh at them ...they wouldn't have the freedom to be jews

Ya know, I remember the 1960's uproar over jewish shitmouth 'comic' lenny bruce and his 'groundbreaking' antics on stage ...white people were revolted by it then, whatta different world that was, eh? I'd take that 'uptight, whitebread' America any day over the sewer we live in now.

jews lower the moral tone and quality of life of any country that is unfortunate enough to suffer their presence, may we be soon rid of these hebes that piss right in the mouth of America and expect us to laugh about it!

Ptoooey!

Kinsman Victor
October 17th, 2007, 11:40 AM
Jew sow

http://tworca.org/news/data/upimages/jew_pig.gif



:[]BiTCH
http://www.synthstuff.com/mt/archives/ugly-dog.jpg

psychologicalshock
October 17th, 2007, 01:12 PM
Jews are all like this when they get scared. Just read Goebbels, he knew them inside out. :)

Demonica
October 17th, 2007, 01:45 PM
Sarah Silverman is a trashy gutter tramp. Her type of antics only appeal to the lowest elements in a society that no longer has a bottom.

who wants to look at this nasty whore grab her filthy shithole? Deport her to some Islamic nation and let some hard core Mullahs do what they will with her.

There's no punishment good enough for this wretched kike cunt. I force myself to watch her show whenever I'm idly flipping channels and I see it's on, which thank gawd is rarely. It's like a crash course in jewology. 2 hideous heeb sisters with faggot friends. One of them is the roadie Otis executes in the hotel room in The Devil's Rejects. Every time I see the nasty beast that scene replays in my mind and I feel all warm and fuzzy inside. I recommend every jew wise person watch this whore just to remind us exactly why we hate these horrid creatures. If you don't have cable download some of her standup shit. "Jesus Is Magic" is a newer one.

Michael S. Burks
October 17th, 2007, 02:14 PM
Give Katie a break. I just recently met her grandfather. Here he is below.


http://www.uk.pg.com/images/zest2Pack.gif

psychologicalshock
October 17th, 2007, 03:21 PM
Give Katie a break. I just recently met her grandfather. Here he is below.


http://www.uk.pg.com/images/zest2Pack.gif
http://www.charleskeath.com/ckeath/assets/product_images/912_f.jpg

This is is softer part of him. :rofl

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:04 AM
'scuse me, Tappan Twat but, didn't I hear this "hilarious" jewess of yours saying something about (now get this, folks) "licking her dog's ass" in a promo for her show?

ROFL!! Hell, you're right: she is indeed "hilarious!" Stop! I'm gonna bust a gut! :krofl :krofl :krofl

:rolleyes:

You are way tooooooo stupid, wabbit boy. It was a spoof on her show. Yes, she has weird and quirky sense of humor.

Hey, tappan dik, you probably are glued to your monitor every nite (and by glue, don't mean the kind you buy, nudge, nudge ;) )perusing porn. you are the sort

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:05 AM
http://www.charleskeath.com/ckeath/assets/product_images/912_f.jpg

This is is softer part of him. :rofl

Yum, that topper looks delish. Where can I get it? My mattress needs a pick-me-up :rofl

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:08 AM
I'm curious...

Do you really expect people to believe, after the way you get humiliated here time and again, that you're actually "laughing" as you write your posts? For once I'm being 100% serious...

Well, do you? I'd really like to know...

Eh, if I was ever humiliated by a bunch of morons, deadbeats, WT such as yourselves, I would start to worry about myself. Nah, I don't let white trash like you humiliate me. You people are a riot.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:20 AM
Unless you're still in Pampers, Katiekike, I seriously doubt he'd show much interest in you. You see, he's a student of the Talmud and he likes his "women" crawling on all fours (and I ain't talking doggy-style, Toots...know what I mean? *nudge nudge* ;)).

So unless you're still shitting yellow, I doubt you'll as much as a second look from this fine-looking fellow.

Whoops! almost forgot: :krofl:krofl:krofl

Was that supposed to be a joke? If it was, you failed miserably. No, actually it is you white trash (mormons in Utah and elsewhere, etc) that like their women "crawling on all fours, nudge nudge).

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:24 AM
She's pretty fucking dumb for a Jew, huh?

I love the way she continually tries to insult our intelligence by using poor grammar, spelling and punctuation. I feel so very inferior. :rolleyes:

Starr nailed it when she said that Katie is helping our cause. What I wouldn't give for a million more inarticulate kikes like her who are outspoken about their hate for Gentiles, while at the same time they help to destroy the myth of Jews as peaceful, open minded and intelligent.

Hey nigger (nghr???), first of all, my spelling and grammar is excellent. Secondly, you will not find another Jew on this forum with my sense of humor, eloquence and "sock it to ya" style. So at best, enjoy my posts. After all, as Garrett says "do you take seriously". VNN is a forum for losers and I post just for fun.

Lastly, I do NOT hate Gentiles. I hate white trash. There is a difference.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:26 AM
Sarah Silverman is a trashy gutter tramp. Her type of antics only appeal to the lowest elements in a society that no longer has a bottom.

who wants to look at this nasty whore grab her filthy shithole? Deport her to some Islamic nation and let some hard core Mullahs do what they will with her.

OBVIOUSLY,.....YOU DO, toots. You watched her do it.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:33 AM
Just two quick points, Tappan Twat and I'll let you fester for a few days...

1) Calling me "wabbit boy" and a "mental midget" merits a :krofl??? That's funny to you?! (I hate to over-emphasize this, folks but it truly says something about this jewess's "sense of humor"...or serious lack of).

and 2) No, I don't make you laugh. You absolutely loathe the way I humiliate you and would give anything -- anything -- if I just simply vanished from this forum for good. And that, Petunia, warms my heart like you couldn't imagine -- knowing that I get under you're fetid, liver-spotted skin.

ciao for now, Toots

Thanks for calling me Petunia, but ROSE suits me better.

No, I don't want you to vanish from the forum. You are a perfect example of the FRINGE of whites. I do not hate whites or gentiles, wabbit boy, just idiots and kooks like yourself who hates ALL JEWS for what a few do/did. You see, I do not hate collectively. I only hate those who hate my people without cause. Who blame all that is wrong with the world on Jews. Who don't look at themselves or their kind for what contributions they make to the destruction of our morals and ethics.

AND, no, you are not important enough in my life to get under my skin. Oh, but you secretly wish you did, am I right? Huh? Come on, fess up :krofl

From your favorite :[]

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:35 AM
) No, I don't make you laugh. You absolutely loathe the way I humiliate you and would give anything -- anything -- if I just simply vanished from this forum for good. And that, Petunia, warms my heart like you couldn't imagine -- knowing that I get under you're fetid, liver-spotted skin. [quote]

she is only laughing because jewess-shrews love hardcore humiliation.
kikes are filthy creatures, who make niggers look decent.

Hey Mikey (I just love saying that, you know the commercial......) but I digress. Yeah, the she-brew loves to be humiliated. Give it to me big (eh little) boy.:krofl:krofl:krofl:krofl:krofl:krofl

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 11:39 AM
jews lower the moral tone and quality of life of any country that is unfortunate enough to suffer their presence, may we be soon rid of these hebes that piss right in the mouth of America and expect us to laugh about it!

Ptoooey!

Coming from you.......that is HILARIOUS! Oh my gosh, you are too funny talking about "moral tone". You are about as amoral as anyone I have ever read online. You are amoral in person as well. After all, how could you hate little 'ole me and talk to me in that filthy way if you were "moral".

Pastor Visser
October 18th, 2007, 11:42 AM
KatieW, which avatar do you like best?

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 12:36 PM
KatieW, which avatar do you like best?

None so far. I think we sort of got off the initial subject.
I am still w-a-i-t-i-n-g.

Dawn
October 18th, 2007, 12:46 PM
Found one! Wait for it.....

http://www.jbs-anne-frank.de/BILD/anne_frank-portait.jpg

Michael S. Burks
October 18th, 2007, 12:48 PM
Found one! Wait for it.....

http://www.jbs-anne-frank.de/BILD/anne_frank-portait.jpg

You know, Jews were the early backers of gay rights in the USA. With their women looking like Katie and the above picture, no wonder so many Jews promote gay rights. Half of the Jewish women look like men in drag.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 02:34 PM
Found one! Wait for it.....

http://www.jbs-anne-frank.de/BILD/anne_frank-portait.jpg


It is a compliment, Dawwwwwn. That little had more character and soul in her pinky than you have in your entire body. So, yes I am flattered.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 02:36 PM
You know, Jews were the early backers of gay rights in the USA. With their women looking like Katie and the above picture, no wonder so many Jews promote gay rights. Half of the Jewish women look like men in drag.

SOME JEWS. LIBERAL JEWS. NOT ALL JEWS. Give me a break, will ya? Are you going to tell me that rich old white men on the Hill didn't give gays rights, moron? Nothing happens in a vacuum, or is that too difficult for you to understand.

Dawn
October 18th, 2007, 02:37 PM
It is a compliment, Dawwwwwn. That little had more character and soul in her pinky than you have in your entire body. So, yes I am flattered.

I'm going to take your money, jew.

Bet that got to ya. :D

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 02:38 PM
I'm going to take your money, jew.

Bet that got to ya. :D

Did you think you made a funny, Dawwwwnnn? Actually, you can have my money, cause I have very little.

So, the joke's on you.

BTW, is that only response you have to my post? Typical WT.

Darren
October 18th, 2007, 02:39 PM
SOME JEWS. LIBERAL JEWS. NOT ALL JEWS. Give me a break, will ya? Are you going to tell me that rich old white men on the Hill didn't give gays rights, moron? Nothing happens in a vacuum, or is that too difficult for you to understand.

Nice try at dismissing the fact that Jews make up a disproportionate amount of these decadent and disgusting movements. http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/2890/smiley2finalhl0.gif

You know, I have a small ounce of respect for Jews who recognize how degenerate their own people are and are out there publicly denouncing it. You, on the other hand, refuse to acknowledge the obvious facts about your race of vermin.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 02:41 PM
and whose control of the social discourse in America led to this disgusting state of affairs? nah, not jews ...:D

I honestly didnt even have a clue who this jewish skank sarah silverman was until I saw this thread ...what kind of woman scratches her sphincter hole in public for laffs ...only a jewess :puke:


LOL ...why do ya think the tribe is in such an uproar over the Muzzies? They well know that they would never have the 'freedom' in a world controlled by Muslims to go up on a stage, drop their pants and take a shit in public and have people laugh at them ...they wouldn't have the freedom to be jews

Ya know, I remember the 1960's uproar over jewish shitmouth 'comic' lenny bruce and his 'groundbreaking' antics on stage ...white people were revolted by it then, whatta different world that was, eh? I'd take that 'uptight, whitebread' America any day over the sewer we live in now.

jews lower the moral tone and quality of life of any country that is unfortunate enough to suffer their presence, may we be soon rid of these hebes that piss right in the mouth of America and expect us to laugh about it!

Ptoooey!


Sewer you say, don't you own a titty bar, goyboy? Are YOU saying that YOU don't enjoy PORN? Surely, the white trash that you are (sorry, I know you are a mod...) a good snuff film will make yer day.

Dawn
October 18th, 2007, 02:41 PM
Did you think you made a funny, Dawwwwnnn? Actually, you can have my money, cause I have very little.

So, the joke's on you.

BTW, is that only response you have to my post? Typical WT.

Yes. Yes it is. I have a rather strong aversion to handling rats. Being a human female, it's in my genetic make-up to avoid unsanitary conditions.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 02:46 PM
Nice try at dismissing the fact that Jews make up a disproportionate amount of these decadent and disgusting movements. http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/2890/smiley2finalhl0.gif

You know, I have a small ounce of respect for Jews who recognize how degenerate their own people are and are out there publicly denouncing it. You, on the other hand, refuse to acknowledge the obvious facts about your race of vermin.

Firstly, You keep saying that gay rights are wrong, when they are human beings. I don't want them flaunting it in my face, but the fact is chances are YOU will have a gay kid, or someone you know. Would you deny him/her rights?

Secondly, we are vermin? Who the fuck created havoc in this world - whites. Who were the worst of the worst in persecution of Jews and other whites - CHRISTIANS. Who in the 14th and 15th centures devised methods of torture, especially in England and German, just to punish heretics and what they assumed were witches. Whose Crimes Against Humanity fills google search? WHITE VERMIN.

Darren
October 18th, 2007, 02:51 PM
Firstly, You keep saying that gay rights are wrong, when they are human beings. I don't want them flaunting it in my face, but the fact is chances are YOU will have a gay kid, or someone you know. Would you deny him/her rights?

Homosexuality should not be treated as acceptable or normal behavior. It is as simple as that. As for rights, what special rights are faggots entitled to? The right to spread their filthy garbage to our children? No thanks.

Secondly, we are vermin? Who the fuck created havoc in this world - whites. Oh, but the Jews are innocent?

Who were the worst of the worst in persecution of Jews and other whites - CHRISTIANS.I don't see a problem here, especially given the treacherous behavior that Jews were known for and rightfully attacked because of.

Who in the 14th and 15th centures devised methods of torture, especially in England and German, just to punish heretics and what they assumed were witches. Whose Crimes Against Humanity fills google search? WHITE VERMIN.Who's religion is Christianity derived from?

Thank you.


Crimes against humanity = anything Jews don't like/agree with. Try speaking on more specific terms instead of vague catch phrases.

KATIEW
October 18th, 2007, 02:55 PM
Yes. Yes it is. I have a rather strong aversion to handling rats. Being a human female, it's in my genetic make-up to avoid unsanitary conditions.


Another funny. Please do not mess with me, maam, 'cause I can run rings around you.

Dawn
October 18th, 2007, 02:58 PM
Katiejew, maybe these are good avatars for you. What say you, about your 'people?'

http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/3a.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/4.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/7.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/13.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/I14.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/17.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/18a.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/22.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/32.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/38.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/42.jpg
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/ColdBlood4.JPG
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/ColdBlood5.JPG
http://www.thewe.cc/thewei/images2/atrocities_files/ColdBlood6.JPG

http://www.thewe.cc/contents/more/archive/atrocities.htm

Dawn
October 18th, 2007, 02:59 PM
Another funny. Please do not mess with me, maam, 'cause I can run rings around you.

Gold rings?

Listen jew, you're talking with a teenage girl who grew up with 5 older siblings. My battles of wit are legendary.

RabbitNoMore
October 18th, 2007, 03:23 PM
Excellent post Dawn. A picture is worth a thousand words, kind of like how six million kikes aren't worth a single Aryan fingernail.
Let's see katie the warthog try and psychobabble her way out of these photos.
Let me make a prediction:The terrorist Palis brought it all upon themselves, by using bottles, rocks, sticks and harsh language, to attack poor poor poy-seh-cuted state of izzy...:rolleyes:

These pics particularly enrage me, because I can easily see my own children being murdered this way, by the demonic kikes, and their gullible goyim lackeys. This piece of shit jewess has the fucking gall to sit and wonder why everyone on the planet hates izzy, and jews in general (our own puppet gubmint excluded, of course. They can't seem to suck izzy's cock hard or fast enough).

DEATH TO ITZ-A-LIE !!!

88

Starr
October 18th, 2007, 06:07 PM
Firstly, You keep saying that gay rights are wrong, when they are human beings. I don't want them flaunting it in my face, but the fact is chances are YOU will have a gay kid, or someone you know. Would you deny him/her rights?

.


The worst and most harmful thing that has come out of the gay rights movement is to put homosexuality on an equal footing with the traditional lifestyle. When you remove the idea that there is one standard above all others that people should revere, you eat away at the sactity of that once standard lifestyle. The traditonal lifestyle of one man and one woman is only supposed to be seen today as one way of life among many, no better than any others. This is one factor in a list of many that has helped lead to the breakup of the family. This and the way in which IT IS flaunted in your face is my main problem. It also sometimes seems to me that homosexuals go out of their way to piss people off and look for reactions that will make "gay rights" an easier sell to people who would be otherwise oppossed.

And what "rights" are you referring to? Should they be allowed to marry? This would not be an "equal" right, but a special right since no one currently outside of one man and one woman is allowed to marry. Why should something like this be allowed of gays, when it is not allowed of a man who might want to marry 5 women,etc.?

There are already laws in place, of course protecting everyone from murder, assault or whatever else harm that could be inflicted on them. Should those who harm gays be seen as worse and deserving of worse punishment than a person who harms someone else for other reasons as the laws are today? Just like with other hate crimes, what these people are getting the extra punishment for is their "unacceptable" thoughts. in some places clergymen are not even allowed to read words from the bible since the bible contains "hate speech" against homosexuals. Quite ridiculous it all is. Very scary road to go down, since it will very likely lead to a situation where those thoughts, themselves, become a crime, just as we see in Europe and Canada. Gays, on average, are also more financially secure than the average general population, so they are obviously not being disciminated against in jobs and other similar areas.

As for why non liberal jews should support "gay rights" I found this article to be pretty interesting:

The decision by Jewish organizations to support, oppose, or remain neutral in a dispute where certain people desire to expand their civil rights is not determined solely by whether the group under discussion is one generally in compliance with Jewish law or morality. It is in the best interests of Judaism to support the continued granting of basic civil rights to all, while making clear our moral opposition to the underlying conduct of those who exercise their freedom in violation of basic ethical norms of Judaism. We are providing no moral legitimization for an activity if we seek to prohibit firing a person from his or her job because of it. Judaism should seek to prohibit people from being fired from their jobs or evicted from their homes for reasons unrelated to their suitability for the job or the place of residence. This rule is in our own best interest, whereas a rule which allows economic discrimination based on society's perception of a person's private morality or religiosity is not.

Introduction

The questions related to political rights and religious freedom in the Jewish tradition are significant. Should Jews support civil and political rights for all, whether we view the conduct we are supporting the right to engage in as ethical or not; or should we seek to use the civil legal system to buttress the Jewish moral view of the world, and prevent activity that violates our ethical norms?

A number of years ago an article appeared in a Jewish Action addressing various issues relating to homosexual rights, which is a fine example of the political problems that those of us who adhere to Jewish law (halacha) as the moral, ethical and religious touchstone of our lives confront.[1] In the course of that article, the authors note:


It is critical to object to the so called gay-rights law. They are paraded as innocent, indeed heroic, human rights protections for individuals. In fact, any homosexual who does not identify himself by his sexual practices or preferences is, both in theory and practice, already protected under the law. The same law that protects all citizens protect homosexual citizens equally. The underlying point is this: Citizens have a right to not be involuntarily exposed to overt sexual behavior or preferences, whatever the nature. So-called rights of homosexuals really amount to a campaign to legitimize homosexuality to obtain society's stamp of approval. This is the real issue and it must be vocalized. The real issue is not individual rights for homosexuals, but collective coercion of everyone else to bend to the legitimization of homosexuality. Homosexual activists' goal is to subvert all of society's laws that protect or promote marriage and morality.

Essentially I agree with neither the factual underpinning of this statement nor the policy it embodies; indeed, I feel that it is a mistaken approach to Religious Jewish public policy. I say this not because the prohibitions involved in homosexual activity are unclear or minor from a Jewish perspective (they are neither); but rather because the public policy decision to seek to deny political rights is fraught with many practical dangers like the proverbial double-edged sword, this weapon, once unsheathed in battle, can well be used to do Judaism generally and Religious Judaism specifically profound harm.

My theme and thesis can be summarized as follows: Religious Judaism is providing no moral legitimization to an underlying activity when it seeks to prohibit firing a person from his job, or eviction from his house, because of that (unethical) activity. This is the basic rule of civil rights. Like free speech, where we all understand that supporting the right of another to speak is not the same as agreeing with what the person says, supporting civil rights for people is not synonymous with morally approving of their actions. Thus, Religious Judaism should support the right of all individuals to be free from harassment and discrimination in their jobs and homes and to insure everyone's physical safety. Judaism should seek to prevent or prohibit people from being fired from their jobs or evicted from their homes for reasons unrelated to their suitability for the job or as a tenant.[2] Indeed, I would suggest that perhaps this should be the primary mandate of many Jewish political groups, which should limit themselves as "Jewish" groups to the topics of combating anti-semitism, pro-Israel advocacy, and protection of freedom of religion, speech and other related rights.[3]


A

Certainly, traditional Judaism would oppose a law that seeks to give homosexuals a preferred place in the legal or social spectrum. Thus, school curricula that teach the moral equivalency of homosexuality, governmental attempts to redefine marriage to include homosexual relations and governmental attempts to prohibit religious organizations from declining to hire overt homosexuals should be opposed.[4] Merely because we favor the decriminalization of what we religious insist is odious conduct and the granting of civil rights for those who engage in such conduct does not mean that, in the name of religious freedom we need to support the placement of such conduct in a privileged position within society.[5] Indeed, it is a nearly risk-free fulfillment of the Jewish people's mandate to be a moral "light onto the nations of the world" and demonstrate our moral and religious disagreement with such conduct.

However, many in the various "religious right" communities advocate policies that seek to go much further than that. They seek to deny basic civil (political) rights guaranteed to all based on a lack of observance of private religious morality or law.

This becomes clear immediately if the word "Hindu" is substituted for "homosexual" or "gay" and "religious" for "sexual" in the above quoted paragraph. The paragraph would read:


It is critical to object to the so called Hindu rights law. They are paraded as innocent, indeed heroic human rights protections for individuals. In fact, any Hindu who does not identify himself by his religious practices or preferences is, both in theory and practice, already protected under the law.... So-called rights of Hindus really amount to a campaign to legitimize Hinduism-to obtain society's stamp of approval. This is the real issue and it must be vocalized. The real issue is not individual rights for Hindus, but collective coercion of everyone else to bend to the legitimization of Hinduism. Hindu activists' goal is to subvert all of society's laws that protect or promote freedom of religion.

Certainly, even if Hinduism were classified as idolatry according to Jewish law and thus a prohibited form of worship for all, we would still favor a Hindu civil-rights law, as a matter of self-interest. This would be particularly so were those who discriminate against Hindus to be the same elements that have in the past sanctioned or encouraged anti-semitism and discrimination against Jews. Jewish society justifies this support for Hindus by asserting that mere political equality is not legitimization of the underlying action.[6] As explained above, Judaism should oppose discrimination in employment and housing for reasons unrelated to suitability for the job or house.

Indeed, the record is full of even Orthodox Jewish organizations advocating support for religions and beliefs that are completely foreign to Jewish law or ethics. For example, in Decker v. O'Donnell, 661 F.2d 598 (7th Cir. 1980) the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations filed an amicus brief supporting the right of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee to use taxpayer-provided money for job training. In Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 429 U.S. 490 (1989), Agudath Israel of America filed an amicus brief arguing that a state's finding that human life begins at conception violated the First Amendment, but that the abortion right should only be fundamental in the exceptional cases of a threat to maternal life or an abortion mandated by sincere religious belief whether such beliefs are Jewish or Gentile. It is hard to justify these and many other public positions except by asserting that our legislative agenda is not solely based on seeking to legislatively prohibit that which is prohibited by Jewish law. Rather, what we seek to codify into secular law must be based on a balance between Jewish law mandates and realpolitik factors.[7]


B

Legislative goals which do not necessarily seek to enforce Jewish law can be well supported from a pure Jewish law perspective. For example, in 1977 Rabbi Moses Feinstein was asked what statutory changes Orthodox Judaism should seek from the New York State government on the issue of time of death. He replied that Orthodox Judaism should seek a legislative mandate that allows each person (or family) to determine the time of death in accordance with their own religious or personal beliefs; he did not suggest that the proper governmental policy to seek is that New York state should be urged to adopt Jewish law in this area. The public policy advocated by Rabbi Feinstein in the context of time of death one of Orthodox Judaism seeking to allow Jews to follow Jewish tradition, without forcing our standards on non-believers was the preferred one. This was so notwithstanding the certainty that some people, given this new freedom, will adopt a standard for time of death which violate Jewish law by withdrawing care before a time permitted by Jewish law and thus commit suicide (or even murder). Rabbi Feinstein did not feel compelled to seek the enforcement of Jewish law by the secular state.[8]

Now comes the difficulty: Do we, as Religious Jews, seek to grant equal civil rights to all or should we join hands with those groups that seek to deny political rights to those engaging in a consensual, but immoral, activity. It requires nearly an act of prophesy to determine which position is in our best long term interest. Frankly, this writer is inclined to answer that we should err on the side of more political freedom, rather than less.[9] The fact is that many of the non-Jewish groups that seek to curtail the political rights of those who deviate from the "Judeo-Christian" ethic, have historically been the profound enemy of the Jewish community.

Thus we are confronted by a set of difficult choices:
We can politically join with those who practice immoral acts to protect our own political future; or
We can associate with those who have oppressed (and murdered) us in the past, (and who we fear will oppress us in the future) to make illegal an activity that we agree is immoral; or
We can decline to publicly involve ourselves in this dispute and adopt an institutional policy of silence while not actively opposing civil rights to all.

I would suggest that, as a matter of political expedience and survival, that the best path for Religious Jews is to generally favor (and certainly not oppose) granting civil rights and political freedom to all, including those whose activity we find religiously repugnant, providing that the prohibited activity is one that is consensual and harms no one other than its voluntary participants; hand in hand with that, we should seek to prohibit commercial discrimination against people based on factors unrelated to the commercial activity, such as religious affiliation, national origin, marital status, race or sexual orientation. This position is based not on the assertion that all such conduct or statuses are acceptable to Jewish law and tradition (they aren't); but on the assertion borne out by history that many of those that seek to curtail activity based on a "religious" sense of ethics quite plausibly will seek, when they are in control, to advance the cause of "Christian ethics" in a way that will be incompatible with the continued successful existence of Judaism in the United States. If we do not seek to protect the civil and political rights of those with whom we theologically disagree, we may find these groups will not seek to assist us when our rights are settled. At the very least, Jewish public policy should not publicly and institutionally oppose granting civil and political rights to all. * * [10]


C

We must realize that the political freedoms granted to minority religious communities through laws which prohibit religious, racial, and sexual discrimination in commerce are quite vital to the economic survival of Judaism in America. These laws are not guaranteed by the Constitution. They have been passed through the support of a broad consensus of minority religious and political organizations. Should each of these groups conclude that they no longer support civil rights for the other groups due to philosophical or theological opposition to the underlying conduct, all of the groups risk losing the protection granted by law. In such a climate, one could easily imagine feminist groups supporting laws which discriminate against Judaism based on their understanding of our ritual practices.

There are those who will reply by asserting that I am understating the countervailing factor: the cultural influence secular society has on religious Judaism. The advocacy of governmental non-intervention in "private" matters will, these people claim, lead to a society so morally and socially disfavored by classical Judaism that our political freedoms will be of no value in such a society as we will not be able to religiously function. That is a danger; however, it seems to this writer that historical precedent runs counter to the belief that such a danger is the most serious. While one can cite numerous examples of Jewish societies within the last thousand years that have been destroyed by cultural and religious intolerance (the Crusades, the expulsion from Spain, the many pogroms, the Holocaust), one is hard-pressed to cite a Jewish culture destroyed by pluralism. Indeed, the Golden Age of Jewish life in Spain six hundred years ago and the incredible religious accomplishments of the Jews of Babylonia more than one thirteen hundred years ago can be attributed to the religious freedom found in that time and each magnificent era ended as religious freedom was abolished in the area. In fact, the political, economic and cultural resurgence of Religious Judaism in America since the 1960's can be directly attributed to precisely the pluralism in American society. The ability to work as a white-collar professional while keeping kosher, taking off for the Jewish holidays, and even wearing a yarmulke at work, is a result of tolerance by the secular society for cultural deviance. While Judaism does face certain challenges in a morally pluralistic society, these are challenges that we can (and will) overcome through heightened observance and additional outreach to the unaffiliated. Governmental persecution, massive societal anti-semitism or significant commercial discrimination against Jews are obstacles that pose much greater danger and are frequently beyond our ability to overcome.[11]

The tenuous basis of our religious freedoms is continuously demonstrated. In 1990 the United States Supreme Court, in Employment Division v. Smith[12] ruled that when a State passes a criminal law, it need not exempt from prosecution people who violate the law even if they harm no one and are motivated by a sincere religious belief. It was only through the efforts of a multi-denominational broad ecumenical coalition of very diverse religious groups that the detestable result the Supreme Court sought to make the law of the land was avoided through congressional legislation, The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, which was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court as it applies to the States in Boerne v. Flores.[13] The right to the free exercise of religion remains unclear in America.

Political vigilance and networking is eternally required to insure the ability of Jews observant of Judaism who wish to remain part of the American political, economic and cultural community and also remain loyal to the Jewish traditions of worship of the One Above. After all, Jewish worship and tradition, with its own unique practices and belief might one day be subject to attempted governmental regulation by those who view it as profoundly foreign and perhaps even unethical, and it is then that we hope our common allies in the battles for religious freedom whose own religious practices we really do not agree with will join us in protecting our rights, as we have joined in protecting theirs.

Conclusion

Judaism should not support the denial of civil rights or the criminalization of those whose victimless actions run contrary to Jewish law or morality, lest we too fall prey to those who disapprove of our own laws or morality. In order to vigorously protect our rights, we must be prepared to defend the rights of others even others we do not agree with. Those who benefit from political pluralism and tolerance must be prepared themselves to be politically pluralistic if they wish to see pluralism continue and to benefit from it.

http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/jewspublic.html

Michael S. Burks
October 18th, 2007, 08:21 PM
This Katie Jew is great. I feel bad though. I can tell she has a thing for Darren, T Garrett and myself. I bet she had to change her panties at least three times today just thinking about us.

To all the lovely Aryan women posting here, sorry for the nasty comments. You all are doing a great job putting this horse face Jewess in her place.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 20th, 2007, 08:13 AM
Thanks for calling me Petunia, but ROSE suits me better.

:[]"Rose"? Well, I can imagine you being so (t)horny, given that you're the quintessential frustrated and frigid jewess and all, but what say I call you Toadstool instead? After all, you were spawned in shit and any man desperate enough to eat you would surely puke like Old Faithful at high noon.

And speaking of losing your lunch (like how I segue into this?):

There once was a jewess from Tel Aviv,
With a snatch so rank you wouldn't believe,
When men would cry "Foul!", she'd let out with a howl,
"Vut?...deh maggots make you heave?!"

(Yeah yeah, I know: I plagiarized that from Robert Frost. So sue me...)

Robert W. Hoffman
October 20th, 2007, 08:28 AM
Hey, tappan dik..."...tappan dik?" :confused: No no no -- you see, I call you Tappan Twat because of the jewess's well-known reputation for being frigid in the sack. (Get it? Tappan's a maker of refrigerator-freezers...) But, Tappan dik? Now I don't know where the hell you came up with tha--...whoa! Hold the phone! You wouldn't by chance be confusing me with that blue-ribbon pooch that was schtooping you at the AKC show in Atlanta last week, would you? You know, when Bowzer froze-up in you and, to the utter shock and amazement of old-money bluehairs promenading their yorkies and schnauzers, highly-embarrassed show officials had to douse you two lovebirds with buckets of cold water in an effort to separate you? Geez, sleaze, get your facts straight before you post.

p.s. And if you're having trouble, Tappan Twat, cramming both feet into your yapper, try one in your mouth and the other in your snapper.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 20th, 2007, 11:05 AM
She's pretty fucking dumb for a Jew, huh?

I love the way she continually tries to insult our intelligence by using poor grammar, spelling and punctuation. I feel so very inferior. :rolleyes:

Starr nailed it when she said that Katie is helping our cause. What I wouldn't give for a million more inarticulate kikes like her who are outspoken about their hate for Gentiles, while at the same time they help to destroy the myth of Jews as peaceful, open minded and intelligent.Her stupidity is obvious even to those just taking a few cursory glances at the content of her posts (not to mention her neuroticism). What really gets me however is that she seems to be totally sincere when she claims that she's giving us "goyboys" how-to and what-for. She actually believes she's coming out on top in virtually every exchange she gets into here....remarkable. To top it off, she not only thinks she's smarter and wittier than anyone else posting in Opp, she also thinks she's downright funny. Go figure. I think she's about as funny as her girlfriend Sarah Silverman. It would appear that ol' Katiedyke, eh, 'scuse me, :o Katiekike, is viewing her screen thru the bottom of a glue jar...

Hibernian 2.0
October 20th, 2007, 11:12 AM
High-speed internet connection? $14.95

Six pack of Columbus Pale Ale? $6.99

Watching the master Hoax verbally eviscerate a Jew? Priceless

ngrh8r
October 20th, 2007, 12:51 PM
Sarah Silverman is a trashy gutter tramp. Her type of antics only appeal to the lowest elements in a society that no longer has a bottom.

who wants to look at this nasty whore grab her filthy shithole? Deport her to some Islamic nation and let some hard core Mullahs do what they will with her.


:krofl :krofl :krofl
Starr, you're starting to sound like a real VNN'er.

When someone(Garrett?) quoted this post from you, I had to go back a couple of pages and make sure it was really you who talked about a "nasty whore" grabbing her "filthy shithole", before not-so-subtly suggesting that she be gang raped and murdered by a bunch of ragheads. :rofl

That's fucking awesome.

Starr
October 20th, 2007, 02:08 PM
:D

well, as I said in one of these threads a couple of days ago, I am starting to get even more pissed than usual about the sewer culture and the affect it is having on people. It has bothered me since I was a teenager and it has gotten dramatically worse since then.

And I was thinking more along lines of sending her to somewhere like Iran hoping she would be hung for crimes against chastity or something of that nature.:p

ngrh8r
October 20th, 2007, 04:40 PM
:D

well, as I said in one of these threads a couple of days ago, I am starting to get even more pissed than usual about the sewer culture and the affect it is having on people. It has bothered me since I was a teenager and it has gotten dramatically worse since then.

And I was thinking more along lines of sending her to somewhere like Iran hoping she would be hung for crimes against chastity or something of that nature.:p


Hey, I'm glad to see your hostility pointed in that direction.
I just hope that the unusual amount of anger in your post isn't indicative of personal unhappiness. Us psychos don't foam at the mouth and scream for Jew blood because we're content with the world, you know. ;)

In a way, I approve of Silverman, and I hope she gets as much exposure as humanly possible. While I'm quite aware that all Jews aren't sexual perverts, they are exponentially more likely to accept and embrace behavior and sexuality that we see as deviant. This isn't any effort to deliberately fuck over the Goyim, mind you. They believe they're looking out for their own interest.

Jews support things like pornography and homosexuality because they're thinking; "Oy vey! If the we let these Goyim get rid of all the fags, they might come after US next!" Jews are raised to equate Christian European values with 'antisemitism' and 'persecution'.

Jewish paranoia is both deserved and justified, but I'm not going to get into whether the chicken or the egg came first. The important fact is that they really are the driving force behind everything from porn movies and strip clubs to gay marriage to children's toys modeled after interracial prostitutes(I'm thininking of Bratz).

faceless
October 26th, 2007, 03:28 PM
http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/thumb/a/a9/Gi-jew-movie.jpg/300px-Gi-jew-movie.jpg

cool:[]
Gr8 pic, is that a real movie?

NS Cat
October 26th, 2007, 04:16 PM
cool:[]
Gr8 pic, is that a real movie?

Stupid fucking jew you don't even know about your own hebrew films.

faceless
October 26th, 2007, 04:49 PM
you don't even know about your own hebrew films.

It looks fake to me ' but I don't know. Is it real?

faceless
October 26th, 2007, 04:54 PM
It is a compliment, Dawwwwwn. That little had more character and soul in her pinky than you have in your entire body. So, yes I am flattered.

Don't take that barking Shiksa to your heart , sis. she knows that some of the most hot women in this planet are from our people and she knows she looks the same as her swineburger diet:D

Alexei Losonov
October 26th, 2007, 05:14 PM
http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/6361/bananasuckjb2.gif
:D

Dawn
October 26th, 2007, 05:17 PM
Don't take that barking Shiksa to your heart , sis. she knows that some of the most hot women in this planet are from our people and she knows she looks the same as her swineburger diet:D

I know a lot actually.

For instance, I do know that Anne Frank couldn't write a diary to save her life. :D

Robert W. Hoffman
October 27th, 2007, 09:49 AM
Secondly, we are vermin? Who the fuck created havoc in this world - whites. Who were the worst of the worst in persecution of Jews and other whites - CHRISTIANS. Who in the 14th and 15th centures devised methods of torture, especially in England and German, just to punish heretics and what they assumed were witches. Whose Crimes Against Humanity fills google search? WHITE VERMIN."Who the fuck created the most havoc in this world"??? Are you shittin' me, Tappan Twat or what? Your Torah is absolutely loaded to the gills with jews annihilating anyone not of the tribe -- slaughtering men, women, and children alike by the tens and hundreds of thousands. YOU were the impetus for the earliest persecutions of x-tians in Rome -- not Whites. YOU made usury a household word in the Middle Ages -- not Whites. YOU were the largest slave-traders in the Western hemisphere -- not Whites. YOU were the philosophers and implementers of communism, a system responsible for more deaths in the 20th century (well over 100 million) than any "utopian" social experiment in 5,000 years of recorded history. YOU were responsible for causing BOTH world wars (the second of which claimed the lives of 50 million worldwide). YOU are the cause of major unrest in the ME (and btw, a majority of the world's population consider Jizrael the major threat to world peace). YOU and your all-powerful lobbies in the US -- AIPAC being the most widely known and feared in Congress -- have duped the gullible goyim in the US to fight your proxie wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (with Iran of course being next on the hit parade). YOU are the only one of less than a dozen nations to possess nuclear weapons and the only ones to deny having them. And we all know where you got the knowledge to make these super WMDs, don't we? Through the Rosenbergs to Jonathan Pollard and dozens of Israel-first "American" kikes, no nation has been more guilty of spying on its "closet ally" than the bandit state of Jizrael. And I haven't even touched on the greatest hoax in world history -- a lie which enables you pieces of dogshit to get away with virtually anything you want on this planet with the cry of "Never again!" and labeling anyone who dares question any facet of the "official" story with the career/reuptation-ruining accusation of anti-semite.

I've got PLENTY more to say on the subject of the parasites that have been eating away at the soul of the West but I'm running low on time. Catch you next week, jewpig.

Robert W. Hoffman
October 27th, 2007, 11:39 AM
I've noticed we seem to be getting off-track from the thread's title: "avatar for KatieW". Here's an adorable pic of Tappan Twat and her ol' man asleep in their bed after an exhausting night of "Not tonight, schmuck, I've got a headache!"

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en-commons/thumb/3/37/250px-American_pigs_in_blankets.jpg

MikeTodd
October 27th, 2007, 11:44 AM
Originally Posted by KATIEW

Secondly, we are vermin? Who the fuck created havoc in this world - whites. Who were the worst of the worst in persecution of Jews and other whites - CHRISTIANS. Who in the 14th and 15th centures devised methods of torture, especially in England and German, just to punish heretics and what they assumed were witches. Whose Crimes Against Humanity fills google search? WHITE VERMIN.

"Who the fuck created the most havoc in this world"??? Are you shittin' me, Tappan Twat or what? Why dignify the arrogant kikenvermin with argument! They are no more fit to judge the actions of White men than they are any other act of nature! All the :[] needs to know about White Men is WE ARE!!!:mad::eek::D Someday MEN will exterminate the kike pestilence,and the termerity of their ravings will fall on deaf ears!

Robert W. Hoffman
October 27th, 2007, 11:46 AM
I know a lot actually.

For instance, I do know that Anne Frank couldn't write a diary to save her life. :DDid you also know that much of her "diary" was written in ballpoint pen, an item that wasn't publicly available until after the war had ended? And that's only the tip of the iceberg...

Dawn
October 27th, 2007, 11:53 AM
Did you also know that much of her "diary" was written in ballpoint pen, an item that wasn't publicly available until after the war had ended? And that's only the tip of the iceberg...

I did, yes. You ever want to see a 10th grade history teacher get flustered? Bring that point up.

Weißmann
October 27th, 2007, 12:24 PM
Anna frank NEVER EXISTED!

It was another "KIKE HOAX" in order to make MILLIONS , BILLIONS of weak-minded people to imagine in their stupid SUB-HUMAN minds the "tragic jewstory" and THEN gain support for the SUB-ANIMAL ZOG.

George Witzgall
October 27th, 2007, 05:37 PM
Whiteman, are you for real? and if so, can I marry you?

ngrh8r
October 27th, 2007, 08:58 PM
Whiteman, are you for real? and if so, can I marry you?


LOL

The response ought to be good...

Weißmann
October 27th, 2007, 11:22 PM
Your Hillbilly Shemale -Wife already answered you Faggot.



Which one of you are PREGGO? or you GAYS did IMPREGNATE to each other at THE SAME TIME? using the KAMASUTRA and reading the Satanic-Talmud while Copulating?

REST IN PAIN BOTH OF YOU SUB-ANIMAL QUEER KIKES!!!!!

Alexei Losonov
October 27th, 2007, 11:51 PM
Mind if I help? I'm a lousy shot and death by blood loss is quite agonizing...:D

Robert W. Hoffman
November 10th, 2007, 09:00 AM
I did, yes. You ever want to see a 10th grade history teacher get flustered? Bring that point up.Unfortunately, I wasn't aware of the jew's shenanigans at your age. (Good little White girl! :), or, bad little shiksa! :mad:)

And for more on the Frank fraud, check this: www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n6p-2_Faurisson.html



(I'm telling you, folks -- you've got to check out the www.ihr.org link in my sig: it's loaded with goodies on the Holohoax and the jew's current agenda for the lowly goyim).

Prince_Vivid
November 12th, 2007, 12:43 PM
I don't know about you, but I think Sarah Silverman is hilarious!!!! Not to mention very pretty. So, thanks. She makes a hell of a lot of moolah doing her antics, dontcha think?

The episode where God killed that guy with the remote control was pretty funny. It did evoke my laughter, and for that I commend her, despite her disturbing obsession with excrement. I've only watched a couple episodes and I found them all to be at least semi-funny. She has a genuine humor at least, that doesn't focus on jewish stereotypes too much.

Of course I find shows like Robot Chicken and Family Guy to be much more funny but their whole point is to throw people off. A lot of jews complain about the jokes but they're all sarcastic(and jew-made), not sincere like the jokes you can find on this forum or other sites. Example: The episode where two Hebrew slaves are carrying blocks and one tries to cheer the other up by saying "Think of it this way: Every group of people has to go through some tough times. But us Jews are getting ours out of the way early. From here on out, it's going to be smooth sailing!". Funny, but what it's really saying is that jews don't have it easy at all.

By emphasizing a stereotype the stereotype is made less believable, non-existent even, thus allowing the 'stereotype' to fester in silence. It's a form of reverse psychology. I don't really mind watching Silver Man though. As for her being very pretty..ummm..

Strader
December 2nd, 2007, 01:21 AM
Another funny. Please do not mess with me, maam, 'cause I can run rings around you.Can you do the swirl?