View Full Version : The Mexicans Next Door: ( A Must Read )
William Hyde
October 21st, 2007, 10:36 PM
The Mexicans Next Door
by Victor Gerhard
Vice-Chairman, White Revolution
> They are everywhere in this small southern city - in the malls, on the
> roads, at the bus stops, in the stores, cramming the schools and the
> hospitals and the jails. They are illegal Mexicans.
>
> As the will of the White race is stripped away they swarm like locusts
> to devour our nation.
> You know they are illegal when they can't speak English, have no
> identification and look clueless and lost outside of their barrio.
>
> They move in packs, usually with one English-speaking translator Mexican
> leading the way. They travel the streets and even in their dazed state
> you can still sense an arrogance about them. And why not? They snuck
> into the country of the White man (who they had formerly held in awe
> though they would not admit it) and found a paradise.
>
> A land full of good paying jobs and politically-correct indoctrinated
> women. And full of men who wouldn't lift a finger to stop the invasion,
> who in fact facilitate it.
>
> They are dark, squatty and gnome-like, with wispy facial hair - and
> that's just the women.
>
> The men can't quite crank out the hair-growing magic. There's almost no
> Spanish there, its all Indian, baby. These Mexicans are positively
> Asiatic.
>
> They look like they belong in the vanguard of Attila the Hun,
> wielding a composite bow and mounted on a shaggy Mongolian pony. If
> there were Mexicans in Middle Earth they'd be drawn up with the legions
> of Mordor, located somewhere between the ranks of the Orcs and the Hill
> Trolls.
>
> On display every weekend for every White man to see is the ultimate
> dispossession scene of illegal Mexicans shopping at Wal-Mart. Our
> third-world carpet-baggers shopping at the ultimate carpet-bagging
> outfit.
>
> It says volumes for the state of our race that the reaction of
> every White man witnessing this scene is to turn away and pretend not to
> see it.
>
> Who's to blame for these Mexicans?
> Well, there is plenty of blame to go around and unfortunately for
> the morale of our race it is White men who run probably all of the
> construction-type companies in this city, and employ about 95% of the
> illegals.
>
> These Whites dangle the jobs that draw the Mexicans to our
> country. One can see these smug looking White men all over the place.
> The White Tarzan-figure surrounded by the dark dwarves down at the local
> convenience store in the morning. As the mestizos stock up on Pepsi
> their White bwana greedily adds up the dollars he'll save by selling out
> his race.
>
> Is there any race-traitor quite like the White businessman? - So happy
> with himself and his wonderfully clever money-saving schemes. One can
> only imagine the look on his face on the day-of-the-rope. "But you don't
> understand, and he'd stammer, ând It was only about the money, the
> money, money, moneyâ?¦ugkh!â"
>
> And what these Mexicans give back to the community. The statistics say
> that second generation Mexicans are MORE likely than Blacks to drop out
> of school.
>
> If there is one thing that people of all races can agree on, it is
> that if your racial pathologies are worse than Blacks it's about time to
> reconsider your very existence.
> I?m saying, I know Mexicans. I'm the Jane Goodall for Mexicans. And
> where did I learn all about Mexicans? Well, not from Mexican TV,
> that's for sure.
>
> In the wonderful race-trading culture of this city illegal Mexicans far
> from home have a choice of 12 Spanish-language TV channels. Of course
> the only people needing 12 Spanish channels are illegal immigrants âs
> everyone knows it and everyone competes to be the one who can most
> completely ignore that fact.
>
> Mexican TV is remarkable for one fact that it has NO Mexicans. Everyone,
> and I mean everyone, anchormen, game show hosts, game show contestants,
> soap opera actors, people on the news âre all as white as
> well, Whites.
> You really learn whats what by watching Mexican TV. It turns
> out no one likes Mexicans, not even Mexicans. Not once do you see the
> swarthy, short form of the majority of Mexicans. And it really tells the
> story. It tells you that the Mexican elites dislike the average Mexican
> just as much as American elites dislike the average American. That is
> why Mexico exports their rot and why we accept them.
>
> It is repeated time and time again how Mexicans have great
> family values. There is some truth to this but it is
> not a plus for our society. Mexicans in Mexico do put a great value on
> family. But they do in to the exclusion of the rest of the country.
>
> If, say, a Mexican's brother commits a vicious murder, he
> will not report his brother because of the close family ties. Family
> comes before the good of the rest of the nation. This fosters corruption
> and contempt for the law.
> So you can see that the Mexican's love for his family is as
> dangerous to our country as the Black's abandonment of his
> family.
>
> I heard on the news today of a politician's plan for a fence on the
> US-Mexican border. Not a bad start but just a fence wonTt do it. I
> think I have what is the essential anti-illegal immigrant plan. It is
> simply a bounty on illegals, let's say $500 for each, with the
> money to be paid by the Federal government to the person who reports an
> illegal who is deported. (Needless to say we would have to greatly
> increase our deportation ability.) AND, $10,000 to anyone who reports a
> business that is subsequently found guilty of employing illegals. This
> plan puts money, unfortunately the great motivator of our age, to work
> actually stopping illegal immigrants.
>
> Fines of say $100,000 levied on businesses for each instance of
> employing an illegal alien would finally get through to the race-trading
> businessman and also fund the reporting plan.
> Think of it, you could make a living working for the deportation of
> Mexicans. We need something of this sort in action fast before these
> low-grade beings from a failed third-world state start telling us how to
> run our lives.
--Victor Gerhard
Jay Jay
October 30th, 2007, 08:02 AM
We should just annex Mexico.
yankee jane
October 30th, 2007, 10:18 PM
http://bp0.blogger.com/_KY6zyxr2y7I/RyfzOTJ63UI/AAAAAAAAABk/QyJ9sK1ycWM/s400/racemixresultschart2
You got it ... go for the traitor employers ... dry up the government faucet ...start deporting ... the rest wil begin to self-deport...
Hell Raising Woman
October 31st, 2007, 08:10 AM
No, what we really should do is create a buffer zone of 20 miles of their land, plant land mines and install 50 caliber machine guns 10 miles from our border. Mexico owes us billions of dollars from all the damage they created by allowing illegals to cross. Twenty miles of their land, extending out along our borders will settle.
Hell Raising Woman
October 31st, 2007, 08:19 AM
No, what we need to do is create a buffer zone that will extend out 20 miles along our borders, plant land mines, and install 50 caliber machine guns 10 milles from our borders. Mexico owes us billions of dollars from all the damage they created by allowing illegals to cross. Acquiring their land this way, will settle the score while at the same time guarantee that an illegal will not try to cross without getting blown up to pieces.
Ironguard1940
November 12th, 2007, 06:25 PM
An excellent post. The only thing I may disagree with is what to do with employers that hire illegal spics. Their business license should be IMMEDIATELY and PERMANENTLY revoked with no possibility of getting another one along with at least one year in federal prison. That would send a message loud and clear that employers who prefer to hire illegal spic invaders to save a buck or two will not be tolerated in any way, shape or form.
IceQueen
December 6th, 2007, 11:11 PM
An excellent post. The only thing I may disagree with is what to do with employers that hire illegal spics. Their business license should be IMMEDIATELY and PERMANENTLY revoked with no possibility of getting another one along with at least one year in federal prison. That would send a message loud and clear that employers who prefer to hire illegal spic invaders to save a buck or two will not be tolerated in any way, shape or form.
The entire business should be seized and sold at public auction. The person who reports the illegals should get a percentage of the sale, and the rest should go to fund the cost of deporting the illegal workers.
If the jobs and government subsidies dried up the illegal immigrant program would take care of itself overnight.
Cate
December 8th, 2007, 04:00 PM
When I look at industries that "require" illegal immigrants, a few stand out. Fast food chains and lawn care services. Cook your own meals (brown bag your lunch) and cut your own grass - you will put an illegal out of work.
Don't think I'm tellling the truth. In the past week, landscaping contractors were lobbying Congress to allow more mexcrement so they would hire shit for lower wages than White Americans would accept.
I see fast food chains, one after another, ceasing operations in Chicago because no one wants to buy food from wetbacks who don't practice good hygiene, carry TB, spread bacterial food through food preparation, and are a total detriment to society.
Justin Lee
December 8th, 2007, 05:37 PM
We should just annex Mexico.
Not a good idea. That would allow them to travel freely anywhere they want in the U.S.
Hell Raising Woman
December 9th, 2007, 12:31 PM
When I look at industries that "require" illegal immigrants, a few stand out. Fast food chains and lawn care services. Cook your own meals (brown bag your lunch) and cut your own grass - you will put an illegal out of work.
Don't think I'm tellling the truth. In the past week, landscaping contractors were lobbying Congress to allow more mexcrement so they would hire shit for lower wages than White Americans would accept.
I see fast food chains, one after another, ceasing operations in Chicago because no one wants to buy food from wetbacks who don't practice good hygiene, carry TB, spread bacterial food through food preparation, and are a total detriment to society.
Hiring illegals to present around food is an enormous health hazard, all right. The started with the jews hiring them to work in meat packing plants and on their farms, in order to make a 100% profit or more. It sure beats having to repair costly farm machines. However, as many prisoners we have incarcerated beyond our city limits, they could perform much cheaper labor and would take less time to pick the crops while producing efficiency. In other words, we don’t need Mexicans. We don’t need illegals. This is all a front to find an excuse to bring illegal Mexicans into this country. The very basic reason is to destroy by Balkanizing the U.S., which is the sole agenda of the :[]. This is no different than what they did to Germany after WWI when they stole control over the banking/loan, real estate, and job industries flooding with immigrants. Certainly, a deja vu in the works in the U.S.
Their main agenda is to make money off the masses, regardless if it causes racial/cultural disharmony or destroys the society in general including mass murders. Look at Hong Kong, China, or any other country with billions of people and notice the investors. Money is flowing like mad. These countries were hardly westernized three decades ago. Many of the citizens in Japan still wore their Kimonos. Now, look at how much their economy and culture is changing. Look at China. Same thing. Three decades ago, they wore their Asian garments. Look at them now with their westernized clothing since their economy boomed in the late 1980’s.
This is what the jews want in the USA – to fit as many different people into the U.S. as possible. If the White population has fallen, you can pretty much determine that our lowly immigration lawyers and their kike bosses are making sure we have billions of non-Whites into our country. Why? Because they know that non-Whites populate at a faster rate than Whites. Why? It’s all about making more money, regardless of the negative consequences.
What is the next step for these lowly people other than to make sure we have an overpopulation problem in the U.S.? Build a superhighway to transport goods and money faster in the U.S. Since we don’t have billions of people in this country yet and making money is more important, they can’t wait for the billions of people to occur anytime soon. They have to make money now. A socialist market.
Hell Raising Woman
December 9th, 2007, 12:39 PM
When I look at industries that "require" illegal immigrants, a few stand out. Fast food chains and lawn care services. Cook your own meals (brown bag your lunch) and cut your own grass - you will put an illegal out of work.
Don't think I'm tellling the truth. In the past week, landscaping contractors were lobbying Congress to allow more mexcrement so they would hire shit for lower wages than White Americans would accept.
I see fast food chains, one after another, ceasing operations in Chicago because no one wants to buy food from wetbacks who don't practice good hygiene, carry TB, spread bacterial food through food preparation, and are a total detriment to society.
Hiring illegals to present around food is an enormous health hazard, all right. The started with the jews hiring them to work in meat packing plants and on their farms, in order to make a 100% profit or more. It sure beats having to repair costly farm machines. However, as many prisoners we have incarcerated beyond our city limits, they could perform much cheaper labor and would take less time to pick the crops while producing efficiency. In other words, we don’t need Mexicans. We don’t need illegals. This is all a front to find an excuse to bring illegal Mexicans into this country. The very basic reason is to destroy by Balkanizing the U.S., which is the sole agenda of the :[]. This is no different than what they did to Germany after WWI when they stole control over the banking/loan, real estate, and job industries.
Their main agenda is to make money off the masses, regardless if it causes racial/cultural disharmony or destroys the society in general including mass murders. Look at Hong Kong, China, or any other country with billions of people and notice the investors. Money is flowing like mad. These countries were hardly westernized three decades ago. Many of the citizens in Japan still wore their Kimonos. Now, look at how much their economy and culture is changing. Look at China. Same thing. Three decades ago, they wore their Asian garments. Look at them now with their westernized clothing since their economy boomed in the late 1980’s.
This is what the jews want in the USA – to fit as many different people into the U.S. as possible. If the White population has fallen, you can pretty much determine that our lowly immigration lawyers and their kike bosses are making sure we have billions of non-Whites into our country. Why? Because they know that non-Whites populate at a faster rate than Whites. Why? It’s all about making more money, regardless of the negative consequences.
What is the next step for these lowly people other than to make sure we have an overpopulation problem in the U.S.? Build a superhighway to transport goods and money faster in the U.S. Since we don’t have billions of people in this country yet and making money is more important, they can’t wait for the billions of people to occur anytime soon. They have to make money now.
Ed Keiser
December 13th, 2007, 05:28 PM
In my area the wetbacks are stealing union construction jobs. The mega builders however have begun returning to union labor because of the shoddy work performed by the mexicants. It's my hope that these traitorous swine have learned a lesson about hiring scabs although I don't think they have I can still hope.
Holly
December 13th, 2007, 06:39 PM
I have read some of it and wil lread the rest later seems good.
Could someone please explain to me the meaning of a carpet bagger ?
DMS
December 13th, 2007, 08:56 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpQq8ufkRgc
Vadler
December 13th, 2007, 09:18 PM
We should just annex Mexico.We should just bomb Mexico.
MikeTodd
December 13th, 2007, 10:34 PM
I have read some of it and wil lread the rest later seems good.
Could someone please explain to me the meaning of a carpet bagger ?
Brief History of Carpetbags and Carpetbaggers
With the rapid expansion of railroads in the 1840’s and 1850’s . Ordinary people were traveling in large numbers, and there was an need for cheap luggage ,so thousands of carpetbags were manufactured. They were made by saddle makers in many town and cities and were many sizes and shape. They were called Carpetbags because the makers would buy old carpets and construct the bags from the pieces of carpet that were not completely worn out. This how Carpet bags could be manufactured cheaply , they sold in Dry Goods for $1 to $2.
By the 1860’s carpetbags were carried by all most everyone, Men, Women, well to do , middle class and not so well to do. Carpetbags were the first suitcases made in large numbers. When you traveled during the Civil War (1861-1865) and though the 1870, you packed your Carpetbag . This became a way to identify an outsider (traveler).
During the civil war Reconstruction Period (1865-1870) many people for the Northern States went South because it was so poor that there many opportunities for a person with money even a little money. For example you could own a farm by paying the past due taxes for as little as $25. These Opportunities attacked all sorts people from honest hard working farmers, to crooks, charlatans, con artist and of course crooked politicians. All these outsiders (identified by their Carpetbag) were called Carpetbaggers and still are in many places. It became the term to refer to a Yankee who moved to the south and usually meant a “damn Yankee and not to be trusted, a scoundrel”. Probably the worst Carpetbaggers were the politicians who used their positions in the corrupt Reconstruction Government to enrich themselves through bribes, graft and other despicable acts at the expense of native Southerners. Today the dictionary defines a Carpetbagger as “ an outsider involved in politics”.
[footer.htm]
http://www.thecarpetbagger.com/history.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpetbagger
William Hyde
December 14th, 2007, 12:51 AM
I have read some of it and wil lread the rest later seems good.
Could someone please explain to me the meaning of a carpet bagger ?
Holly, In United States history, carpetbaggers were Yankees who moved to the South after the devastation of the Civil War to take advantage of easy pickens and reap ill gotten gains. They formed a coalition with Freedmen (freed slaves), and Scalawags (Southern whites who supported the Reconstruction) in the Republican Party, which in turn controlled ex-Confederate states for varying periods, 1867–1877.
"Carpetbaggers" was coined from the carpet bags used as inexpensive luggage.
D. Smith
December 14th, 2007, 02:43 AM
Could someone please explain to me the meaning of a carpet bagger ?
Nowadays the term is used to describe a person or group of persons who move from their location of origin to another place in search of material or other gains. It was coined during the post civil war period by southerners who loathed northerners (some of whom were kikes) who moved into their war-ravaged area in order to buy up assets for pennies on the dollar. Upon moving in, some of these northerners carried all of their possessions in large bags literally made from a carpet-like material, hence the term "carpet bagger."
14whitelightning88
January 20th, 2008, 03:20 AM
Their businesses should all be seized and the money given to those whites who are unemployed and to any organizations which organized the capture of the illegal alien in question. :hflol
Dirk
January 22nd, 2008, 04:55 PM
They look like they belong in the vanguard of Attila the Hun, wielding a composite bow and mounted on a shaggy Mongolian pony. If there were Mexicans in Middle Earth they'd be drawn up with the legions of Mordor, located somewhere between the ranks of the Orcs and the Hill Trolls.
:rofl :rofl :rofl
Kievsky
January 22nd, 2008, 05:49 PM
When I look at industries that "require" illegal immigrants, a few stand out. Fast food chains and lawn care services. Cook your own meals (brown bag your lunch) and cut your own grass - you will put an illegal out of work.
Don't think I'm tellling the truth. In the past week, landscaping contractors were lobbying Congress to allow more mexcrement so they would hire shit for lower wages than White Americans would accept.
I see fast food chains, one after another, ceasing operations in Chicago because no one wants to buy food from wetbacks who don't practice good hygiene, carry TB, spread bacterial food through food preparation, and are a total detriment to society.
Foodnotlawns sums it up, Cate. Amerikwans should scrape off the useless turf and plant gardens. Kills two (metaphorical) Mexican shit-birds with one stone -- both the landscapers, and the ag workers.
Americans need to take care of their own earth. I don't understand the aversion to it. Sure, I don't like the way dirt dries out the skin of my hands either, but that's why I wear gloves when I handle dirt directly. You can get a 3 pack of gray Stihl gloves for 10 bucks.
Developers often scrape off the top soil where they are building houses and sell it. This happened to my property. At least the guys who built my house were local White men. But it took me a couple years to replace that topsoil with leaves and horse manure. I expanded my gardens to an area where the soil wasn't scraped off, and wow it is naturally rich and loamy.
But anyway, every American that doesn't like illegal immigration should participate in local agriculture one way or another, or he's full of hot air.
PC}{Magician
January 22nd, 2008, 06:30 PM
http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w34/PCMagician/0101020115130116062007122405ced1991.jpg
White Minority
January 23rd, 2008, 11:36 PM
I have no insurance...I have no licence
DMS
January 26th, 2008, 05:17 PM
Mexico City rolls out women-only buses
By OLGA R. RODRIGUEZ, Associated Press Writer
Thu Jan 24, 6:26 PM ET
MEXICO CITY - Groping and verbal harassment is an exasperating reality for women using public transportation in this sprawling capital, where 22 million passengers cram onto subways and buses each day. Some men treat women so badly that the subway system has long had ladies-only cars during rush hour, with police segregating the sexes on the platforms.
But that hasn't helped women forced to rely on packed buses, by far the city's most-used form of public transportation — until this week.
Acting on complaints from women's groups, the city rolled out "ladies only" buses, complete with pink signs in the windshields to wave off the men.
As word spreads about the buses, the women seem delighted, while some men forced to wait a few minutes longer have shown their anger. Still others have stumbled on board despite the signs, much to their embarrassment.
On Thursday, passengers on one of the female-only buses spent most of their trip down the capital's tree-lined Reforma Avenue chatting or putting on makeup, instead of fighting off unwanted male attention.
"Women were asking for this service because of the sexual harassment, especially groping and leering," Montiel said.
And while some men have complained that they have to wait longer for a bus, she said the women are thrilled: "The women are really happy and we have been getting a lot of e-mail and letters from them."
Juliana Romero, a 49-year-old secretary, said not riding with men is "fantastic."
"When the bus is packed, there will inevitably be a lecherous man who will bother you," she said.
While only seven female public bus users complained last year, she said the real number of offenses was probably much higher, because women rarely protest openly against sexual harassment.
Some women, like Maria Elena Sanchez, have learned to take matters into their own hands. A 47-year-old office messenger who uses public transportation all day, said she carries a sewing pin for protection.
"I always carry the pin so I can defend myself from abusive men," she said — adding that she's had to use it twice this month alone.
Traveling only with women, she said, makes her feel more secure and allows her to relax a bit on the way to work.
"I don't think I will use the pin on these buses," she said, giggling.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.