Log in

View Full Version : McCarthyism-Advantage or detriment?


Kind Lampshade Maker
June 10th, 2004, 05:52 PM
What has White society gained from it or where has it set us back?

Alex Linder
June 10th, 2004, 05:59 PM
What has White society gained from it or where has it set us back?

'McCarthyism' is overrated. There is 100x the pressure to conform to the jews' party line in 2004 than there was to any anti-communist party line in 1950. In fact, even back the pressure against our side was greater than any pressure our guys put on jews. The whole thing has been lied up into a useful tool to bash the right, one aspect of the usual 'Pleasantville' meme, whereby White America, while seemingly pleasant and civilized on the surface, concealed a hellhole of repression, political and sexual. It's a lie. You will have to ask 100 ordinary adults over fifty to find one who believes things are better now in America than in 1960. And that one will either be a teacher, ie dumb and brainwashed, or in some other way affiliated with government.

What White society can gain from is our repeated use of the simple term 'jew.' When VNN started, people were afraid to use it. Through repetition and normal use, today far more people are NOT afraid to use it. To point out that jews operate as a group, and a group that is paranoid and intensely hostile to every other group, even groups it uses, and that this hatred finds its way into laws prepared for facade politicians by the hate jews of ADL and other anti-Aryan jewish hate groups.

J._Stiller&Anne_Mara
June 11th, 2004, 03:49 AM
Like, what's wrong w/ McCarthy? He was against commie jews and their stealing of nuke secrets.

I'm against ......wasting everybody's time here. You notice I did provide an option called the bling bling forum... a general rants if you will.

.........
hey ......... McCarthy was taking the jews down dude, I'd have him back in a second!

McCarthyism missed its objective. Many went down, White and not, while others got away. In other words, the net caught only the small fishes while the big ones were able to get through. Okay, so a couple of Rosenbergs got their sex organs arc-weldet on the hot seat, but this was to the delight of the Hassids who were more than happy to see the commie Jews go, because those Reds didn’t fit into their agenda. Hey, how about registering as the Rosenbergs using my avatar turned backwards. Oh, forgive me. That’s my Jewish humor again.
Anyway, what we were left with was an empowered Gay Edgar Hoover and the continuation of cultural and moral erosion performed by the likes of The 3 Jooges of whom Schickelgruber set a price on their heads, way back when, and continued filming way up to the late 50’s unscathed from McCarthyism. Jews kept running Hollywood and the likes of Don Rickles, Rodney Dangerfield, Jewry Stller and Anne Maera eventually died only to go to Vegas and continue deficating in our heads.
As usual, the Jews used this and every other mass hysteria, since then, for their own advantage. This flag-waving post-911 mass hysteria is proof.
These events come and go and it’s always the Jews who advance from this.
We get left holding the douche bag and come out of it as international laughing stocks.
Excuse me while I go flush my mental toilet.

Antiochus Epiphanes
June 11th, 2004, 09:54 AM
the American concept of free debate and so forth is a noble one, and worth implementing. But it is, after all, just another idea. Two thousand years have shown that Jews are master manipulators in environments with and without intellectual freedom, so really "free speech" or even its restriction "if we were in charge" does not offer any permanent key to containing them.

basically our problem with jews is as organic and simple as that of host and parasite. that's the main "idea" the jews are trying to repress today, because it's the one that contains both the diagnosis of our problem with them, and the PROGNOSIS as well. They lie about the first and fear the second.

"free speech" is in some ways like "in-group amity" and altruism. Functions well within certain parameters-- but bring in too much "diversity" and you're just going to have chaos. That in a word is what they have fomented since their takeover of the 1930s. The "McCarthy era" was a short burst of counter-revolution of that and then it was aborted by Jew whining until the Aryan sense of "fair play" imposed a handicap on McCarthy.

No what we should learn from this is that Whites especially the masses manipulated by the televitz are weak and easily swayed by Jew whining. So any attempt to root out Jew corruption must be accompanied by a simultaneous controlling presence in mass media to stop their usual whining handwringing tactics and the predictable sympathetic White response.

The Final Solution
June 13th, 2004, 08:59 AM
What has White society gained from it or where has it set us back?

Nothing. Not only was the "tail-gunner" in bed with queer kike Roy Cohn to ensure that he, like JBS, would remain kosher, but his biggest supporters were the so-called "China Lobby," who were mostly US businessmen pissed about the loss of profits due to Mao's victory. Who lost China, not who lost Eastern Europe was the big question in anti-Communism at the time. One of the leaders of the lobby was kike silk merchant Alfred Kohlberg. Who but a greedy kike could convince White people to care whether Chinks were ruled by authoritarian Chiang or totalitarian Mao, when in fact their strictest dictatorship is imposed by the very Chink mentality and family? A ridiculous diversion to be repeated with much White blood lost in Korea, 'Nam and now in the absurd attempt to "democratize" the Arab World, against its very nature.

Antiochus Epiphanes
June 16th, 2004, 10:46 AM
Nothing. Not only was the "tail-gunner" in bed with queer kike Roy Cohn to ensure that he, like JBS, would remain kosher, but his biggest supporters were the so-called "China Lobby," who were mostly US businessmen pissed about the loss of profits due to Mao's victory. Who lost China, not who lost Eastern Europe was the big question in anti-Communism at the time. One of the leaders of the lobby was kike silk merchant Alfred Kohlberg. Who but a greedy kike could convince White people to care whether Chinks were ruled by authoritarian Chiang or totalitarian Mao, when in fact their strictest dictatorship is imposed by the very Chink mentality and family? A ridiculous diversion to be repeated with much White blood lost in Korea, 'Nam and now in the absurd attempt to "democratize" the Arab World, against its very nature.

Hey, I didnt know that about McCarthy. I am totally in agreement with the irrelevance of whether China is red or not. Utopian schemes masking economic interests in "international trade" which is perennially the territory of the jew.