I'm reading this now (ordered from amazon). I was amazed how scholarly the book is (someone who hasn't taken a research methods class may not understand all the data being provided...hell I took one and I still don't get all of it).

It's clear that Rushton has published some serious science here, and that the liberal academia tried to keep it hush for a good reason. He concludes that genetics play a role in behaviour and intelligence (GASP), as well as cultural and economic factors. Rushton is not a 'racist' or a 'nazi' or even a 'white nationalist', as many have 'smeared' him as. He is simply a scientist who is trying to explain the world around him using data.

He cites over 1,000 sources in his book I believe, and if anyone out there has not read it, I highly recommend it. That being said, I wish "Stormfront" would keep their crazed public worship of Rushton off the radar. Even if guilt by association is a logical fallacy, such pinings will do nothing than harm the image of an already slandered Professor.

In todays' modern media, consensus may very well equal truth. Anyone else have opinions on this?

Rushton's book is good.

Another good book about race is "Race" by John Baker:

http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0150.html


----

Definately have to pick that up after I finish this and CotC....

A brilliant, innovative work. I especially enjoyed his exposure of the Marxist agenda of his devious kike critics. As a result, here, his Zundelian experience with Canaduh's Orwellian "human rights" laws:

The New Enemies of Evolutionary Science

Liberty, March, 1998, Vol. II, No. 4, pp. 31-35

The decencies and pieties of the age are at war with the pursuit of truth.

http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushtonpdfs/Liberty.pdf

Rushtons book is invaluable to those seeking to understand the undeniable differences between human races. I've left more than a few anti's with no opposition whatsoever thanks to that book and I continue to recommend it to those who I feel need a little nudge into the realm of racial awareness.

I hope rushton does a future (and similar) study on mixed race children. Now that we have the data on the full race, it would be interesting to look at black/white or black/asian people and see if they're more intelligent (or any of the 60 variables)...

I for one, want to see more data on eurasians from a Rushton methodology. I have a feeling about this already, but it would be nice if hardcore data confirmed it. Here's one from CBSNews:

Yet in other types of characteristics — including grades, verbal ability and parents' education — the study found that mixed-race students tend to fall between the single-race adolescents who shared part of their background. For example, Asian students had higher grade-point averages than whites, and children with both Asian and white parents had averages between those two peer groups.

I hope rushton does a future (and similar) study on mixed race children. Now that we have the data on the full race, it would be interesting to look at black/white or black/asian people and see if they're more intelligent (or any of the 60 variables)...

I for one, want to see more data on eurasians from a Rushton methodology. I have a feeling about this already, but it would be nice if hardcore data confirmed it. Here's one from CBSNews:

Yet in other types of characteristics — including grades, verbal ability and parents' education — the study found that mixed-race students tend to fall between the single-race adolescents who shared part of their background. For example, Asian students had higher grade-point averages than whites, and children with both Asian and white parents had averages between those two peer groups.


Only (East) Asians have a slight advantage over Whites in terms of IQ, and even this is merely 3-5 point's at best, however the Standard deviation indicates that we (Whites) produce geniuses at a much higher frequency, as history itself has shown.

Most South American "hispanics"(mestizos) are genetic Eurasians(Amerindian+Spanish) to varying degrees of each racial type, if I remember correctly their IQ average is 5 points higher than the 85 Average for African Americans.

Only (East) Asians have a slight advantage over Whites in terms of IQ, and even this is merely 3-5 point's at best, however the Standard deviation indicates that we (Whites) produce geniuses at a much higher frequency, as history itself has shown.

Obviously. I am 50% German, 10% French, and 40% VC. What other asians would I be referring to? Hopefully not...

Most South American "hispanics"(mestizos) are genetic Eurasians(Amerindian+Spanish) to varying degrees of each racial type, if I remember correctly their IQ average is 5 points higher than the 85 Average for African Americans.

Amerindians are not oriental mongoloids. Would you like me to call an arab or jew white just because they are also mostly caucasoids? When I use the word Eurasian, I am describing people of white european and oriental asian descent.

Amerindians are not oriental mongoloids. Would you like me to call an arab or jew white just because they are also mostly caucasoids? When I use the word Eurasian, I am describing people of white european and oriental asian descent.

Ok whatever so they're not Eurasians, I guess a better term would be "Eurmongoloid". :confused:


And what's "VC", Vietnam?

Yes, northern. I don't like the South Vietnamese.