Log in

View Full Version : Subhuman Niggers torture cow.


NS Cat
December 9th, 2007, 08:12 PM
LRnzzeKOivc
Hey antiracists, do you think we should import these underprivileged africans to a White nation so we can be enriched?

hengest
December 9th, 2007, 09:25 PM
I didn't watch the video, for any kind of animal cruelty makes me scarlet with rage, but taking delight in the suffering of others, whether animal or human is just TNB it seems.
Both niggers and kikes are alike in that sense.

Alexei Losonov
December 9th, 2007, 09:49 PM
Their corpses should be made into fertilizer for a plant with more value than a nigger i.e. any.

D. Smith
December 9th, 2007, 09:53 PM
Utterly disgusting. The apes in the video were probably collecting blood to use as an ingredient in some kind of 65-IQ-inspired hocus pocus voodoo potion.

F.W. Braun
December 9th, 2007, 10:00 PM
Subhuman and nigger = tautology.

Hell Raising Woman
December 9th, 2007, 10:55 PM
[quote=NS Cat;682320
Hey antiracists, do you think we should import these underprivileged africans to a White nation so we can be enriched?[/quote]

We already have this scum in our country. This is the sort of stuff the jews have orgasms over. They know the niggers can and will slaughter Whites in the same sort of fashion. So here they are doing their thing the jews love, committing murders against Whites while they are not convicted of hate crimes.

Instead, the Whites are convicted of hate crimes so that it would be harder for us to fight back. We have become silence of the lambs.

Thorn
December 9th, 2007, 11:56 PM
The movie wouldn't play for me. What's it about?

Karen Z.
December 10th, 2007, 12:02 AM
They tap the vein and drink the blood. They also shove their faces deep into cow crotches to eat the menses. Anything but actually eat the cattle, the dumb bastards. Better to eat baboons and snakes, i guess.

White Winger
December 10th, 2007, 09:19 AM
Isn't that just like a nigger, to do shit like that to an animal? Isn't it obvious, after all this time, that most animals ,if not all , are at least a notch or two higher than niggers?That even cows are far more intelligent and far more useful to this world, than niggers have ever been? Does this not prove that niggers are sub-animals?

Vadler
December 10th, 2007, 11:31 AM
Isn't that just like a nigger,just like a sub-animal, to do shit like that to something far more intelligent and far more useful to this world, than they have ever been?The only animal that I would torture would be a nigger,especially an urban gangbanger.

Prince_Vivid
December 10th, 2007, 01:15 PM
Both niggers and kikes are alike in that sense.

Wasn't it your own people who started bear baiting, bull baiting, and cockfighting? STFU. You and your goddamn animal rants. This is the only animal rant that I found to be productive, and funny too. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=441717

Ze'ev
December 10th, 2007, 08:17 PM
Raid hits child porn producers
Police in Sweden and Norway launched a combined action on what they believe could be a pedophile network that has produced and distributed child pornography around the world. Dozens of Swedish children may have been abused.

Fredrikstad police leave with the suspect's computer.
PHOTO: Sverre Chr. Jarild
Related stories:
Oslo purged of porn - 30.04.2003
Clergyman says boredom led him to child porn - 25.04.2003
Court OKs surfing for child porn - 01.10.2002
Libraries give porn-surfers the boot - 30.09.2002
Police drop half of all child porn cases - 19.09.2002
Child porn definition controversial - 11.09.2002
700 names on child pornography list - 04.09.2002
Norway involved in child porn raids - 15.11.2001

Two arrests were made as police descended in Fredrikstad, Norway and Swedish capital Stockholm. Computer hard disks were confiscated and will be examined for pornographic images.

Norway's National Bureau of Crime Investigation has long been after the source of particularly hardcore images distributed on the Internet. A 41-year-old Swede is suspected for being a central figure, and police now believe he has both committed and photographed serious sexual assaults on children.

continued here http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article545792.ece

Karen Z.
December 10th, 2007, 10:55 PM
Wasn't it your own people who started bear baiting, bull baiting, and cockfighting? STFU. You and your goddamn animal rants. This is the only animal rant that I found to be productive, and funny too. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=441717

Indeed we did, invent bear baiting etc. We are certainly not without reproach.

Know what else we do? We set aside gigantic tracts of land as wildlife refuges for animals, what do your people do? Poach, and if given control of the country the park is in, slaughter and brutalize every animal within it's border. Ever see Africa Addio(goodbye africa). You should.

Your people murder chimpanzees and gorillas, which are as human as blacks IMO with all the god-given rights, and EAT them. I wonder what Koko would sign if told that?:(

NS Cat
December 10th, 2007, 10:58 PM
Raid hits child porn producers
Police in Sweden and Norway launched a combined action on what they believe could be a pedophile network that has produced and distributed child pornography around the world. Dozens of Swedish children may have been abused.

Fredrikstad police leave with the suspect's computer.
PHOTO: Sverre Chr. Jarild
Related stories:
Oslo purged of porn - 30.04.2003
Clergyman says boredom led him to child porn - 25.04.2003
Court OKs surfing for child porn - 01.10.2002
Libraries give porn-surfers the boot - 30.09.2002
Police drop half of all child porn cases - 19.09.2002
Child porn definition controversial - 11.09.2002
700 names on child pornography list - 04.09.2002
Norway involved in child porn raids - 15.11.2001

Two arrests were made as police descended in Fredrikstad, Norway and Swedish capital Stockholm. Computer hard disks were confiscated and will be examined for pornographic images.

Norway's National Bureau of Crime Investigation has long been after the source of particularly hardcore images distributed on the Internet. A 41-year-old Swede is suspected for being a central figure, and police now believe he has both committed and photographed serious sexual assaults on children.

continued here http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article545792.ece

What the hell does this have to do with this thread?

Most child molesters are jews. We have several threads on vnn about rabbis who molest children.

Although some child molesters in the link you mentioned are Whites, if you look at the stats you will see that jews are dramatically overrepresented.

Darren
December 10th, 2007, 11:11 PM
The resident Jews would have us believe that all races are equally represented in the statistics of animal abuse or child pornography (whatever that has to do with this thread).

Rosenkike just got through telling us about all the black inventions we depend on in society :hflol.

Ze'ev
December 10th, 2007, 11:19 PM
just pointing out that evil of any nature does not limit itself to only one ethnicity.

Yes the majority of crime offenders are black, and yes I have read that psychopathy has been rampant amongst jews (perhaps due to the tortured psyche of many jews...who knows.

There have been plenty of pedophiles that were white or black or jewish or mexican or asian tho.

Evil is evil, and people are a product of their environment.
Look at manson, bundy, dahlmer

all 3 were what you would consider white I believe...

Prince_Vivid
December 11th, 2007, 01:05 AM
Indeed we did, invent bear baiting etc. We are certainly not without reproach.

It's refreshing to see some type of conviction.

Know what else we do? We set aside gigantic tracts of land as wildlife refuges for animals,

Neato :cool:

what do your people do? Poach,

I never implied that they did otherwise. And what they do with their animals in Africa isn't exactly my main priority, nor should it be yours.

and if given control of the country the park is in, slaughter and brutalize every animal within it's border.

That's your opinion. On a more factual note, there is a valid correlation between serial killers and animal abuse. Apparently they use the animals as their practice victims. But I don't really feel like getting into a 'your race kills more animals than my race' type of argument. I don't claim to be a member of PETA or any such organization. What whites do with their animals is irrelevant to me.

Ever see Africa Addio(goodbye africa). You should.

*yawn* Maybe I will.

Your people murder chimpanzees and gorillas,

And Americans don't poach in Africa? :rolleyes: From what I've read, the African poachers are being replaced by technologically advanced poachers(white people).

which are as human as blacks(

That's funny and all, I do get a kick out of racist humor, especially anti-jew or anti-white jokes. But I disagree with you on that.

I do however agree that blacks generally have lower IQs than whites and the jews cannot fool me into thinking otherwise. But at the same time whites cannot fool me into thinking that I'm a walking, talking, ape. As Air Supply put it, "I know just when to face the truth and then I know just when to dream."

James Hobbes
December 11th, 2007, 02:22 PM
Physically torturing living, conscious, and perhaps, just perhaps, self aware animals is on the exact same spectrum as supporting animal slaughter by consuming meat products; they are merely on a curve.

This is why I teach that conscious, living organisms such as humans are equal to other animals in terms of welfare in that we deserve to have the right to not be killed prematurely or without rational justification.

I'm fine with "free-range farms" that allow their animals to grow old and do as they please before they are killed and sold, however a vast majority of manufacturers that place the label on their product are outright lies.

Ze'ev
December 11th, 2007, 11:33 PM
Physically torturing living, conscious, and perhaps, just perhaps, self aware animals is on the exact same spectrum as supporting animal slaughter by consuming meat products; they are merely on a curve.

This is why I teach that conscious, living organisms such as humans are equal to other animals in terms of welfare in that we deserve to have the right to not be killed prematurely or without rational justification.

I'm fine with "free-range farms" that allow their animals to grow old and do as they please before they are killed and sold, however a vast majority of manufacturers that place the label on their product are outright lies.

killing an animal for food if that is the way you live is one thing.
An argument can even be made for sport hunting (although I disagree w/ it)
Outright cruelty or torture of any sentient organism is simply evil tho.

NS Cat
December 11th, 2007, 11:44 PM
just pointing out that evil of any nature does not limit itself to only one ethnicity.

Yes the majority of crime offenders are black, and yes I have read that psychopathy has been rampant amongst jews (perhaps due to the tortured psyche of many jews...who knows.

There have been plenty of pedophiles that were white or black or jewish or mexican or asian tho.

Evil is evil, and people are a product of their environment.
Look at manson, bundy, dahlmer

all 3 were what you would consider white I believe...

You gave me 3 White evil ppl so I'll give you 3 evil jews.

The serial killer known as the "Son of Sam" and also Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold (the 2 youths who shot up the Columbine highschool) were all jews.

NS Cat
December 11th, 2007, 11:59 PM
Gorillas are beautiful, gentle, and intelligent creatures and it is really sad that people would compare them to niggers.

Seriously, look into this Gorrila's eyes:
http://www.gorilla-haven.org/ghphotos/joestillunsurebutlovingit.jpg
You can see intelligence and awareness in it's face.

Unlike this soulless sub-animal piece of shit nigger:
http://i17.tinypic.com/53tl2et.jpg

Flame Baiter
December 12th, 2007, 01:00 AM
I saw something like that on a show about Africa. The tribesmen tap the blood from a cow like that, and mix it with milk. (Though I didn't see exactly that done in this video). The cow lives so that they can tap it again some other day.

Just the thought of drinking fresh blood mixed with milk makes me a little queazy.

Nice find NS Cat.

Ze'ev
December 12th, 2007, 01:56 AM
You gave me 3 White evil ppl so I'll give you 3 evil jews.

The serial killer known as the "Son of Sam" and also Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold (the 2 youths who shot up the Columbine highschool) were all jews.

son of sam was adopted.
not sure on the other 2...those dont sound like jewish last names but ill take your word for it.
I did not say jews do not commit evil...
Was simply pointing out that evil does not discriminate.
There are evil jews sure
there are evil blacks
there are evil whites too tho, and any other race you can pick.

NS Cat
December 12th, 2007, 04:38 PM
son of sam was adopted.
not sure on the other 2...those dont sound like jewish last names but ill take your word for it.
I did not say jews do not commit evil...
Was simply pointing out that evil does not discriminate.
There are evil jews sure
there are evil blacks
there are evil whites too tho, and any other race you can pick.

Son of Sam was adopted by 2 jews Nathan and Pearl Berkowitz. They named him David Berkowitz.

His original name was Richard David Falco.
His biological parents were Betty Falco (whose maiden name was Broder) and Joseph Kleinman.

So biologically this guy was at the very least half jewish.
He was raised by jews and trained to be a jew.

In 2002 Berkowitz reaffirmed his Jewish faith during a 2002 Larry King interview, saying "I feel that I'm totally Jewish. I was born a Jew, I feel I'm going to leave this world a Jew".

Religiously he was 100% a jew.

Ze'ev
December 12th, 2007, 09:13 PM
Son of Sam was adopted by 2 jews Nathan and Pearl Berkowitz. They named him David Berkowitz.

His original name was Richard David Falco.
His biological parents were Betty Falco (whose maiden name was Broder) and Joseph Kleinman.

So biologically this guy was at the very least half jewish.
He was raised by jews and trained to be a jew.

In 2002 Berkowitz reaffirmed his Jewish faith during a 2002 Larry King interview, saying "I feel that I'm totally Jewish. I was born a Jew, I feel I'm going to leave this world a Jew".

Religiously he was 100% a jew.

oh.
My bad I did not know that...obviously.
I had heard in the past that he was jewish, but adopted.
Did not bother to look it up.
Regardless...My point remains the same.
Sure there have been jewish killers and rapists and child molesters.
There have also been plenty that were not jewish however.
Evil...and good, exist among all peoples.

NS Cat
December 13th, 2007, 11:14 AM
oh.
My bad I did not know that...obviously.
I had heard in the past that he was jewish, but adopted.
Did not bother to look it up.
Regardless...My point remains the same.
Sure there have been jewish killers and rapists and child molesters.
There have also been plenty that were not jewish however.
Evil...and good, exist among all peoples.

Even if you still want to keep the belief that race races are equally evil/good there is still the issue of certain races supporting their own evildoers.

When a White person does something bad like serial killing he is hated and rejected by the White community who want him to have life in jail or death penalty.

When a negro does something bad virtually all negroes support him even though he is evil.

Most negroes supported Michael Vick and OJ.

Jews also do this.

Phil Spector (a jew who murdered a goyim) was not convicted because there was one or two fellow Zionists on the jury.

Many jews are given lighter sentences because the judge is a member of the same tribe as the defendant.

Have thorough read of this site:
http://judicial-inc.biz/mendel_beilis.htm
(read all of it)

Even if this jew is not representative of jews as a whole.

Or even if this jew is innocent...

Other jews worked very hard to obstruct justice and bail out their tribesman.
Even murdering witnesses!

When the (jewish)Bolsheviks took over in 1917, all the witnesses, expert witnesses, prosecutors, judges, etc were put on trial, and then executed. Anyone that spoke out during the Beilis trial against Jewry, fell as victims to the Jewish-Bolshevist Terror.

Professor of Psychiatry, J. Sikorski, and the student Golubov were shot, under martial law in Kiev, together with other witnesses. Professor Kossorotov; murdered by poison. Vera Cheberyak was shot.

The ones siding with the Jews, like Bechterev, received a leading scientific administrative posts.
-----------
They spent 17 million rubles on this single trial, they killed at least three witnesses, and bribed countless police, judges, and prosecutors.

The jews support their own even when they are evil.
Many unlawful jews flee to Israel when their crimes are uncovered.

Ze'ev
December 13th, 2007, 05:01 PM
Even if you still want to keep the belief that race races are equally evil/good there is still the issue of certain races supporting their own evildoers.

When a White person does something bad like serial killing he is hated and rejected by the White community who want him to have life in jail or death penalty.

When a negro does something bad virtually all negroes support him even though he is evil.

Most negroes supported Michael Vick and OJ.

Yes I have seen this.
Just look at Sharpton and Farrakhan...I will not debate this.

This view is not held by the vast majority tho.
Most blacks think Rodney King is a complete horses ass for example...and I Do not think the majority of ANY race condones murder, rape, or lack of compassion in general.

Jews also do this.

Phil Spector (a jew who murdered a goyim) was not convicted because there was one or two fellow Zionists on the jury.

Many jews are given lighter sentences because the judge is a member of the same tribe as the defendant.

Have thorough read of this site:
http://judicial-inc.biz/mendel_beilis.htm
(read all of it)

Even if this jew is not representative of jews as a whole.

Or even if this jew is innocent...

Other jews worked very hard to obstruct justice and bail out their tribesman.
Even murdering witnesses!

When the (jewish)Bolsheviks took over in 1917, all the witnesses, expert witnesses, prosecutors, judges, etc were put on trial, and then executed. Anyone that spoke out during the Beilis trial against Jewry, fell as victims to the Jewish-Bolshevist Terror.

Professor of Psychiatry, J. Sikorski, and the student Golubov were shot, under martial law in Kiev, together with other witnesses. Professor Kossorotov; murdered by poison. Vera Cheberyak was shot.

The ones siding with the Jews, like Bechterev, received a leading scientific administrative posts.
-----------
They spent 17 million rubles on this single trial, they killed at least three witnesses, and bribed countless police, judges, and prosecutors.

The jews support their own even when they are evil.
Many unlawful jews flee to Israel when their crimes are uncovered.

Dunno about all this...but I do not doubt that it is true.
These jews do not speak for all jews tho is what you must realize.

Ze'ev
December 13th, 2007, 05:03 PM
I think that every race would condemn acts of brutality or cruelty of any sort.

Atleast the vast majority or average if some sort of poll would be taken.
I doubt many jews would vote in favor of son of sam for example.

I know I wouldnt.

Alex Linder
December 13th, 2007, 05:35 PM
The assumption should be that races are different until proved otherwise. Look at the Vick case. Most blacks aren't bothered in the least by Vick's torturing dogs. No more than they were by O.J.'s murdering Nicole. Whites falsely assume that others races think and feel the way they do, but they don't. It's not that some Whites don't like torturing animals, it's that most Whites don't. But you'd have to search far and wide to find nigs or mexes or Asians bothered by animal torture.

Darren
December 13th, 2007, 06:01 PM
I think that every race would condemn acts of brutality or cruelty of any sort.

One only needs to look at the native culture of the people in question to answer this question. Given the amount of documentation showing the cruel treatment of animals by the non-white races, how can you say this?

You only come to this conclusion because you take a view of the morals of western society as a whole; a society that was largely founded on the values of White Europeans.

And, as Alex says, we do not absolve our own kind of the misdeeds we criticize other races for doing; we point out that the other races are often responsible for it in much greater proportions. If in a sample of 20 whites and 20 blacks, 1 of the whites is guilty of a violent crime and 5 blacks are, that does not make the two races equal.

Darren
December 13th, 2007, 06:03 PM
Most blacks think Rodney King is a complete horses ass for example

I quite honestly don't know what most blacks think about him. Are you referencing some survey or is this what you think is true?

and I Do not think the majority of ANY race condones murder, rape, or lack of compassion in general.

I don't think most blacks are a fan of crime. That, however, doesn't change the fact that blacks have a much greater propensity for committing it.

NS Cat
December 13th, 2007, 06:08 PM
The world's most prolific serial killer was jewish!

He is rarely ever discussed in the media.

The jews try to keep a lid on crimes committed by fellow jews.

Proof here: http://judicial-inc.biz/harold_shipman.htm

Ze'ev
December 13th, 2007, 07:57 PM
The assumption should be that races are different until proved otherwise. Look at the Vick case. Most blacks aren't bothered in the least by Vick's torturing dogs. No more than they were by O.J.'s murdering Nicole. Whites falsely assume that others races think and feel the way they do, but they don't. It's not that some Whites don't like torturing animals, it's that most Whites don't. But you'd have to search far and wide to find nigs or mexes or Asians bothered by animal torture.

Not true sir.
Plenty of blacks were disgusted by Vick, and spoke out against him.
Sharpton or the naacp do not speak for all blacks.

The O.J. trial was just a travesty...but the same has happened with Whites too.
Look at this guy in the news now, suspected of killing his wife, and his last wife too perhaps.
Watch him get off...
Nobody condones this tho.
Sharpton does not speak for ALL blacks anymore than you speak for all Whites.

Ze'ev
December 13th, 2007, 07:58 PM
The world's most prolific serial killer was jewish!

He is rarely ever discussed in the media.

The jews try to keep a lid on crimes committed by fellow jews.

Proof here: http://judicial-inc.biz/harold_shipman.htm

if that is true I would never condone it, nor would any "jews" that I know or associate with.

Starr
December 13th, 2007, 08:02 PM
Son of Sam was adopted by 2 jews Nathan and Pearl Berkowitz. They named him David Berkowitz.

His original name was Richard David Falco.
His biological parents were Betty Falco (whose maiden name was Broder) and Joseph Kleinman.

So biologically this guy was at the very least half jewish.
He was raised by jews and trained to be a jew.

In 2002 Berkowitz reaffirmed his Jewish faith during a 2002 Larry King interview, saying "I feel that I'm totally Jewish. I was born a Jew, I feel I'm going to leave this world a Jew".

Religiously he was 100% a jew.

Both of his real parents were jews. He identifies today as a born again.

another well known jewish serial killer is Joel Rifkin.

Not true sir.
Plenty of blacks were disgusted by Vick, and spoke out against him.
Sharpton or the naacp do not speak for all blacks.

Plenty of blacks is not a majority. The type you refer to are considered to be the uncle toms(outcasts) among their people.

There is not one of us that do not know that whites commit crimes or that people of all races commit crimes, but it is incredbily faulty for people to state that as some kind of counter argument against the fact that certain people, time and again, whatever society they live in, are so many times more likely to commit violent crimes. This is also never something that society should ignore. Ignoring these realites puts people at risk when they do not have to be. Should people go on believing that any given unknown person is equally as likely to pose a danger to them as the next person, even when one of those people, is actually statistically, many times more likely to be dangerous? Certainly no one would ever suggest, for example, that you should be just as trusting of a convicted felon as you would a person who has a clean criminal record. and yet there are going to be plenty of individual convicted felons who have decided to turn their life around and might not have any intentions of doing anything to you. Should we toss all of that aside to be "fair" to the more decent felons or is it wise to be a little more leery of that problematic population, as a whole?

T. Denton
December 14th, 2007, 10:41 AM
The resident Jews would have us believe that all races are equally represented in the statistics of animal abuse or child pornography (whatever that has to do with this thread).

Rosenkike just got through telling us about all the black inventions we depend on in society :hflol.

That must have been the world's shortest post--no wonder I couldn't find it! :D

Ze'ev
December 14th, 2007, 11:47 AM
Both of his real parents were jews. He identifies today as a born again.

another well known jewish serial killer is Joel Rifkin.



Plenty of blacks is not a majority. The type you refer to are considered to be the uncle toms(outcasts) among their people.

There is not one of us that do not know that whites commit crimes or that people of all races commit crimes, but it is incredbily faulty for people to state that as some kind of counter argument against the fact that certain people, time and again, whatever society they live in, are so many times more likely to commit violent crimes. This is also never something that society should ignore. Ignoring these realites puts people at risk when they do not have to be. Should people go on believing that any given unknown person is equally as likely to pose a danger to them as the next person, even when one of those people, is actually statistically, many times more likely to be dangerous? Certainly no one would ever suggest, for example, that you should be just as trusting of a convicted felon as you would a person who has a clean criminal record. and yet there are going to be plenty of individual convicted felons who have decided to turn their life around and might not have any intentions of doing anything to you. Should we toss all of that aside to be "fair" to the more decent felons or is it wise to be a little more leery of that problematic population, as a whole?

Charles Carl Roberts IV?
Jeffrey Dahlmer?

Yes jews commit crimes
so do white people
so do black people.
Do you really think that jews are not disgusted by a heinous crime if it was commited by a fellow jew?
Or blacks same thing?
I highly doubt that is true.

anyways...found this interesting

Below is a list of serial killers who were homosexuals. This list is intended for reference purposes only and does not imply a causal relationship between homosexuality and serial killing.
Although incidents of serial killing are widely reported in the media because of the heinous and unusual nature of these crimes, there are actually very few serial killers relative to the general population. Research into this phenomenon is ongoing, and a small industry has sprung up around the practice of "profiling" serial killers in order to assist in their apprehension. But, law enforcement officials agree that each serial killer is unique. Society does not currently have sufficient knowledge to predict serial killing before it occurs and thus prevent it from happening.

Serial killers and their victims include people from all races, cultures, nationalities, economic background, educational levels, genders, and sexual orientations. Because serial killers are so rare, it is impossible to use any demographic indicator as a predictor. There are no "rules" and all apparent trends have been broken. But some general observations can be made.

Serial killers are nearly always men (93%). Furthermore, of the relatively few female serial killers, one third of them worked in partnership with males.

In the United States, serial killers are predominantly white. This makes sense statistically, because about 80% of the population is white. According to some sources, whites are over-represented and African-Americans are under-represented among serial killers, but this depends on how one defines a "serial killer." The more celebrated, headline-grabbing serial killers are generally white, but if one counts all perpetrators of multiple homicides, including drug- and gang-related killings, then African-Americans account for between 20% to 30% of all multiple perpetrators, according to statistics compiled by the FBI. African-Americans comprise about 13% of the total U.S. population. Asians, who comprise probably under-represented among American serial-killers. Asian serial-killers are extremely rare in the United States, but Asians comprise only about 4% of the U.S. population so, statistically speaking, one would expect few Asian serial killers. There have been some high-profile Filipino serial killing and murder cases. Filipinos comprise a relatively newer and less affluent immigrant population relative to other major Asian groups in the United States.
continued here http://www.adherents.com/misc/hsk.html

Kelly D.
December 16th, 2007, 12:50 PM
They are just killing the cow properly halal. Not worse than what goes on in factory farming. :(

NS Cat
December 16th, 2007, 01:08 PM
http://i13.tinypic.com/6poht2c.jpg

Vadler
December 16th, 2007, 03:23 PM
http://www.africancrisis.org/Photos45.asp More horrifying pics at bottom of link.

Mark
December 16th, 2007, 03:27 PM
While distasteful to me, I don't see this as a good example of psychopathic behavior, deriving excitement and enjoyment by hurting others. They do it for nourishment, not for torture. It's no more wrong than eating a steak. The slaughtering of animals in general is not a pretty sight, but that is how we maintain our health, we consume other formerly living things, whether plant or animal. Psychopathy is higher among blacks, but you should show a better example to prove your point.

Vadler
December 16th, 2007, 03:46 PM
While distasteful to me,Psychopathy is higher among blacks.Yeah,that is an understatement. Your avatar has a female pic and your name is Mark. wtf???

Roberto Abbondanza
December 16th, 2007, 03:55 PM
They must've wanted to be the shit(literally) out of it for some magic mushrooms. A Nigger can never resist the feeling of "high."

They should be tortured in exchange.

Vadler
December 16th, 2007, 07:04 PM
They do it for nourishment, not for torture.
You are wrong and an idiot,as well. The Zimbabwe war veterans unleashed by President Mugabe are slaughtering animals in an unprecedantal scale. The poaching leaves no animals spared. The countryside is covered in rotting carcasses and skeletons of antelope,wildebeest,zebra,lions,elephants,rhinos,leopards,water buffalo,giraffe and countless other animals. Similar things are happening all over the African continent. They do not do it for nourishment but for poachery and torture. Niggers feel no remorse because they are animals themselves.

Magog
December 17th, 2007, 07:13 AM
fucking niggers.

James Hobbes
December 19th, 2007, 09:30 PM
killing an animal for food if that is the way you live is one thing.
An argument can even be made for sport hunting (although I disagree w/ it)
Outright cruelty or torture of any sentient organism is simply evil tho.

The vast majority of people living in first world countries do not need to eat meat to sustain an efficient and healthy diet.

However, a common counterargument to a moral argument of vegetarianism is that eating meat is in fact good for the people in first world countries, primarily people of European descent, because meat production is so damn inefficient that we are starving the other 70% of the human populations that live in poverty. This is evidenced by the fact that 1/16th of grain production directly goes to feeding humans whereas the rest is processed by farm animals which then become our food. Obviously, if the great nations became vegetarian, we would not only be acting humane by saving other conscious creatures lives, but we would be helping our fellow man in Africa and Asia by exporting our excess grains to their countries, feeding millions.

Vadler
December 19th, 2007, 10:12 PM
...but we would be helping our fellow man in Africa by exporting our excess grains to their countries, feeding millions.I don't consider Africans as being my fellow man. These subhumans have all the available farmland they need to feed themselves but they are too stupid and lazy to make use of it. F_ck them,let them starve.

NS Cat
December 19th, 2007, 11:40 PM
I don't consider Africans as being my fellow man. These subhumans have all the available farmland they need to feed themselves but they are too stupid and lazy to make use of it. F_ck them,let them starve.

You are right.

Africa could potentially grow more food than any other continent. It has huge wide open plains perfect for growing crops.
It is the most resource rich continent.

Niggers were to stupid to take advantage of it.
They literally tread on diamonds under their feet.

If White people populated Africa instead of niggers it would be the wealthiest continent in the world even surpassing North America.

Karen Z.
December 20th, 2007, 07:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze'ev Rosenzweig
killing an animal for food if that is the way you live is one thing.
An argument can even be made for sport hunting (although I disagree w/ it)
Outright cruelty or torture of any sentient organism is simply evil tho.

Human is the only creature makes the sentient list.. although the cetaceans, psitaccines, elephants and apes come close- sentience=high reasoning.

So you don't eat kosher, Zeeeeeev?