I suggest we write one of these. Give it your attempt.

LewRockwell.com is the main libertarian site. Its writers have initiated a campaign to write Open Letters to every segment of the community on behalf of Ron Paul. I suggest we do this for Whites.

Why? Because an Open Letter to Whites will point out the truth that the libertarians are at particular pains to deny, which is that the real thing driving the Paul phenomenon, and the real reason his campaign makes jews apoplectic, is that he is, whether he wishes it or even understands it himself, giving head and voice to a decapitated community - the normal majority, the real Americans - ordinary White people.

The White race is struggling to find political expression and Ron Paul is the most dramatic expression of that tacit need yet seen in our lifetimes.

I think Will Williams might be able to do this best, but I welcome any Open Letters you can come up with. Letters or simply points to be included in letters.

Next I'll post some examples of Open Letters already published at Rockwell's site, to give you examples.

An Open Letter to Republicans

by Andrew Ter-Grigoryan

This is a letter to all of my fellow Republicans, written on behalf of the presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul.

If you have been following the Presidential campaign this year, the chances are good that you have encountered a candidate whose name is Ron Paul. Though underreported by the mainstream media (shakes fist at air angrily), the Congressional 10th-term Texas Republican candidate's run for the White House has amassed untold millions and has a legion of grassroots support across America. My fellow Republicans, if you are reading this and have decided to reject Ron Paul's candidacy, please allow me to explain why I so strongly believe that Ron Paul is the man that I believe will rescue our party and restore our Constitutional republic if we elect him into the White House.

Dr. Paul is truly a rarity in today's political environment. A strict adherent of the Constitution, Ron Paul his had the same consistent positions throughout his ten total terms in Congress, and has never compromised his values to a corrupt incentive or special interest. If you would like to read about Ron Paul's presidential platform, go to RonPaul2008.com (which just so happens to be the most visited website of any politician currently running for President, Republican or Democrat). Here is an overview of Ron Paul's positions on some of the major issues of this year's race for the White House:

Abortion: Ron Paul, who delivered over 4,000 infants from the womb over the course of his medical career, has one of the strongest pro-life records in Congressional history. Unlike Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney (before he flip-flopped), Dr. Paul opposes the Roe vs. Wade ruling and views a developing unborn life as a sovereign being, and has always voted that way in Congress. When our party led Congress, we may have had the opportunity to overturn Roe vs. Wade, but it appears that to many, the votes that could potentially be gained from the issue being open was a stronger incentive than actually overturning the decision. Abortion is one of the key GOP issues, and Ron Paul can truly represent our party on it.

Border Security: Like international faux-"free trade" deals such as NAFTA and CAFTA, some of our Republican politicians in Washington were misled into voting for amnesty for illegal immigrants not because of loyalty to conservatism but because of pressure from the president. Ron Paul opposes any plan for amnesty or an open borders policy. Much of his solution incorporates federalism and private ownership. Ron Paul is completely, unabashedly anti-amnesty. In fact, he supports what even Tom Tancredo would not – ending birthright citizenship for the children of illegals. Ron Paul's policies as President would ensure an end to this country's illegal immigrant problem.

Economics: Some have said that the GOP can no longer be considered the party of fiscal conservatism and market libertarianism. After begrudging support of new taxes, out-of-control spending, pork-barrel spending, unbalanced budgets, and many socialist programs, our politicians, even, unhappily, Republicans, often appear disingenuous when they talk of halting increases in taxation and spending. The braver ones may talk of lowering taxes as well. But of all the current candidates, only Ron Paul will abolish the income tax and phase out the IRS. He has never voted for an increase in taxes, an unbalanced budget, programs that propose welfare or affirmative action, or to even raise his own pay! Following with his commitment to personal liberty and limited government, Paul's economic positions are largely based on his decades of studying the free-market philosophy of the Austrian School of economics of Mises and Hayek. Above all this, Ron Paul realizes how much of our economic woes go back to the dollar itself, which is why he contends for a return to the gold standard and the end of the Federal Reserve.

Education: Whereas the party once opposed public-schooling measures and a Department of Education (as Paul still does), schooling freedom has continued to wane. Some of our politicians have allowed themselves to be watered down to the point of supporting No Child Left Behind. Ron Paul wants to make private and home schooling viable options once more by restoring educational freedom, while deconstructing the federal bureaucracy. School vouchers do not have the ability to accomplish these ends.

Health: As a lifelong physician, Ron Paul obviously has a lot of firsthand experience with the health care situation. When his patients could not pay for medical services, he helped them regardless, without pay. He understands that some Americans are unable to pay for their health care, mostly because of present anti-free-market policies in this field, not a lack of big government social programs. As the dollar gets further inflated and income further taxed, how can the average American be expected to keep up? Remember that since the government has unfortunately conditioned our citizens to depend on programs like Medicare, Ron Paul will not actively work to phase them out as President, but he would work to give citizens the option to opt out of such programs.

Family: Unlike the GOP "front-runner" Rudy Giuliani, Ron Paul lives by his own moral values. He is possibly the most socially traditional of all the candidates running for President. Dr. Paul is a family man who has been married to his wife Carol for fifty years, has five children, and many more grandchildren. Although he does not publicly focus on this aspect of his life, like much of the GOP base, he is a churchgoing Baptist. If he gets the nomination, no kind of attack ads from the Democratic opposition would be able to lay a glove on Ron Paul's personal life, because there is simply nothing to be attacked! In Congress, he never voted for abortion, for infringements on our religious freedoms, or for an economic policy that harms the middle-American family. Ever. He voted against a national ban on same-sex marriage on federalist grounds. Marriage – period – is a private and societal institution that should not be connected with the State or its nanny-state benefits. That's the way it used to be in this country.

Foreign Policy: And here we reach the pivotal point. Fellow Republicans, if the current foreign policy's intrinsic failures have not been enough to convince you that it is errant, let me offer a recommendation: read your history! Far from a fringe renegade, Ron Paul's non-interventionist foreign policy is simply the policy that our party once had. What do WWI, WWII, the Korean War, Vietnam, the Bay of Pigs, and our presence in Kosovo have in common? They were all started by big-government Democrats and opposed by conservatives! The American people voted in our party to end self-destructive conflicts like the Korean and Vietnam Wars. How did the current administration's policy come to be the norm? It certainly was not the policy advocated by Russell Kirk, Robert Taft or President Ronald Reagan. President Bush's foreign policy is informed by members of an intellectual school called "neo-conservatism" encompassing those like Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol, Norman Podhoretz, and Paul Wolfowitz, many of whom are former Marxists! Such a policy has already cost us trillions, reduced our national sovereignty, tarnished our image abroad, bred extremists, and entangled us in ever more perpetual and complicated conflicts and alliances, exactly what our nation's Founding Fathers warned against. Ron Paul, a former serviceman, supports our troops but not any errant, non-traditional foreign policy. He also supports the U.S. pulling out of NATO and the U.N., positions which used to be conservative boilerplate. A Ron Paul administration would be strong on defense; not offense. The mainstream media (boo! hiss!) tries to characterize him as out of step with Republican traditions; no, it is the other candidates who want the US to be the world’s policeman, who are incompatible with our basic philosophy.

Guns: In Congress, Ron Paul has never voted for a piece of legislation that would have infringed upon the rights of gun owners (well, further than they've already been trampled on). Paul is a gun owner standing 100% opposed to gun control and votes against any legislation to that effect. Giuliani, Huckabee, and Romney all have terrible records on gun rights. We must be wary of the Democrats in Congress that would strip us of our rights to own a firearm to protect ourselves and our loved ones.

How can we compromise ourselves in this critical time by supporting a candidate who can not fully represent our most basic historical beliefs? It is crucial that we lend our support to this man’s Presidential bid and his undiluted platform. What is the extent of Ron Paul’s competition? Rudy Giuliani? A fiscal moderate and social liberal without foreign policy experience. Mike Huckabee? An amnesty-loving big-government tax-and-spend "right-wing progressive" who will wreck federalism. Mitt Romney? Ditto, and a flip-flopper. John McCain? A thoroughly lukewarm big-government neoconservative. Fred Thompson? A zombie, with the Hollywood writers on strike. And all of them are in support of a failed foreign policy that compromises the values of our nation.

Finally, there is another objection, not to Paul's political program but asserting that "he can't win." We must not deceive ourselves in this way. Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate that I believe can defeat Hillary Clinton almost on default if nominated, largely due to the contrast between his views and her vicious welfare statism and her hawkish foreign policy not even in tune with her own party. Only Ron Paul of all the Republican candidates can attract uncommitted and even Democratic voters. The Paul campaign has enormous grassroots support from Americans of all walks of life, and has raised unbelievable amounts of money. Paul has over 40,000 Meetup groups to Huckabee’s 3000+. On November 5th the campaign raised an amazing $4.3 million, an all-time GOP fundraising record. On Dec. 16th, the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, he is expected to break even that amazing fundraising record. Don't trust the "official scientific" polls that claim to represent "likely" Republican voters for one second. Those polled therein had 80% support for Bush’s performance in Iowa and 55% in New Hampshire, meaning that the majority polled were hardcore Bushites. So, his actual Republican support, plus his massive independent support, is far greater than those polls would indicate. Ron Paul's supporters can also be expected to have a much higher voting turnout than supporters of other candidates. Ron Paul can win the Presidency, and if so, can certainly bring forth an era in this country that will far outshine the Reagan revolution.

"In your heart, you know he's right."

December 10, 2007

Andrew Ter-Grigoryan [send him mail] is a college student in Kentucky.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/ter-grigoryan1.html

An Open Letter About Open Letters

http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block90.html

An Open Letter to American Muslims on Behalf of Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/ali1.html

An Open Letter to the Jewish Community in Behalf of Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block88.html

An Open Letter to the Jewish Community Part II

http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block89.html

An Open Letter to the Protestant Community in Behalf of Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance127.html

An Open Letter to the Catholic Community in Behalf of Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods83.html

Open Letter to the Arab-American Community in Behalf of Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/ajjan2.html

Why Ron Paul Is Right About Terrorism: A Letter to the GOP Base

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/beito2.html

An Open Letter to Orthodox Christians, on Behalf of Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/carlton1.html

Open Letter to Mormons Regarding Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/higgins1.html

An Open Letter To Libertarians on Ron Paul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/gordon/gordon31.html

Farmers for Ron Paul

http://www.farmersforpaul.org/index.html

I suggest we write one of these. Give it your attempt.

LewRockwell.com is the main libertarian site. Its writers have initiated a campaign to write Open Letters to every segment of the community on behalf of Ron Paul. I suggest we do this for Whites.

Why? Because an Open Letter to Whites will point out the truth that the libertarians are at particular pains to deny, which is that the real thing driving the Paul phenomenon, and the real reason his campaign makes jews apoplectic, is that he is, whether he wishes it or even understands it himself, giving head and voice to a decapitated community - the normal majority, the real Americans - ordinary White people.

The White race is struggling to find political expression and Ron Paul is the most dramatic expression of that tacit need yet seen in our lifetimes.

I think Will Williams might be able to do this best, but I welcome any Open Letters you can come up with. Letters or simply points to be included in letters.

Next I'll post some examples of Open Letters already published at Rockwell's site, to give you examples.

I'll lend my name to it and can speak from experience having actually worked in the campaign and already exposed in MSM as a "neo-nazi infiltrator." Thanks for your confidence, Alex.

All input welcome. My first thought is that the long-suffering White majority's boat will rise with the Ron Paul "freedom" tide along with many other subgroups that are fed up with the status quo. We are the only ones that will disenfrancise our influential bloc vote.

To be able to associate with one another freely and to reassert our Bill of Rights without Giuliani, Chertoff, Mukasey, etc., and their Patriot Act and their goddamned "domestic insurgent" label of us, should be reason enough to fight for Dr. Paul's nomination for Republican presidential candidate. That, among other positive planks in Dr. Paul's platform, will buy us some much needed time to regroup for <ahem!> majority interests. We do speak for the majority and recognize it as a group or collective with political interests that we dare to represent, whether our candidate acknowledges those vital interests or whether he likes collectives or not. Or whether our people want us to represent their interests, or not, for that matter.

We will deal with the political process on our terms. The racial implications running with this election cycle are unlike any in my memory, but only because we have Ron Paul monkeywrenching the quadrenniel exercise to our advantage, probably unwittingly, with his freedom message. We're the good guys. Our boat will rise along with others without JOG's heavy hand and "hate laws" selectively queering our every step forward. :cool:

What's the plan to disseminate the open letters among white lemmings ?? Alex ?? Will ??

Point is to show up the libertarians for what they are, and to demonstrate that Ron Paul's real support group is Whites. He may get a few nigs, jews and spics, but on the whole, these groups want nothing to do with him because his policies run contrary to their interests. It's better for them to keep the System we have. It allows them to feed on Whites. Anyone opposed to the System's foundation -- forced racial integration -- is its mortal enemy. Ron Paul can't speak this openly, and it's the one are in which he plays along like every other Paul. But we support him because he supports certain race-neutral laws he calls constitutional that would have the effect of helping WN by liberating them to protect their own kind - legally.

So we write these letters and forward them to the libertarians at LRC, and post them here. And see what kind of play we get. Conceivable it is that the jewstream media will pick them up, in line with its campaign to portray Paul as a (negative).