For your knowledge, "aryan" lord, morality is an aryan thing as much as it is a semitic thing. Read about the golden age of our ancestors: Republican Rome, Classical Greece as well as their northern neighbors. Here is the list of essential Aryan virtues, with their antithetic counterparts:
freedom - slavery
truth - lies
honesty - deceitfulness
order - chaos
honor - vileness
justice - injustice
courage - cowardice
strength - weakness
loyalty - treachery
control of oneself
glory - humility
duty
measure
wholeness

Just see in which side do you qualify?

I am glad that you acknowledge morality to be a semitic concept!
From where do you get your concept of morality from? Is this from an inner conviction or is this a false system of petty morals that has been forced upon you or which you have inherited and blindly accepted without question?
I believe in utility. I do not believe in absolute good or evil and I suspect that all this talk of petit-bourgeois morality is a carryover from post-xtian times?

Hmm... A pig feels good while taking a bath in the mud. Any attempt to place him out of his chosen environment would make him react the same way as you would. Sometimes, the difference between a WN punk and some token nigger are so blurred that once the prejudices are removed, they both discover they love the same things: get sum pussy, doing nothing, having "fun" (= drinking, taking dope, nothing productive whatsoever). Do you love putin a cap in sum mofo ass, as well?

Hmm... A pig feels good while taking a bath in the mud. Any attempt to place him out of his chosen environment would make him react the same way as you would. Sometimes, the difference between a WN punk and some token nigger are so blurred that once the prejudices are removed, they both discover they love the same things: get sum pussy, doing nothing, having "fun" (= drinking, taking dope, nothing productive whatsoever). Do you love putin a cap in sum mofo ass, as well?

Try and address the points that I have made in the initial post instead of engaging in unnecessary and infantile diversion tactics! You do have an answer to my points I take it? Just to remind you what they were:

I am glad that you acknowledge morality to be a semitic concept!
From where do you get your concept of morality from? Is this from an inner conviction or is this a false system of petty morals that has been forced upon you or which you have inherited and blindly accepted without question?
I believe in utility. I do not believe in absolute good or evil and I suspect that all this talk of petit-bourgeois morality is a carryover from post-xtian times?

Hmm... A pig feels good while taking a bath in the mud. Any attempt to place him out of his chosen environment would make him react the same way as you would. Sometimes, the difference between a WN punk and some token nigger are so blurred that once the prejudices are removed, they both discover they love the same things: get sum pussy, doing nothing, having "fun" (= drinking, taking dope, nothing productive whatsoever). Do you love putin a cap in sum mofo ass, as well?

All things in moderation, but putting a cap in some mofo's ass...I do not do that for free http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/7497/icontwistedtz9.gif

I am glad that you acknowledge morality to be a semitic concept!
I don't know where you got that from... If that were true, then you should better join the croud of Jew-worshipers.

Morality, which means to its core refrain on one's instincts, is a necessity in EVERY civilization. In the absense of morality, society implodes into a chimp-like fission-fusion order where the arbitrary rules: whatever effective is good. Even though EVERY civilization has had its moral values, they were by no means identical. The morality of Akkadians and Romans couldn't be more different. A couple of basic things, however, are shared because they were dictated by a similar necessity: laws against killings, theft or adultery.

In both societies (the former being Semitic, the latter being Aryan), virginity was expected for a bride and marriage was a contract between families. What was the necessity behind these laws? They relieved society from the time other animals spend in trying to find and secure a mate, it created an environment where instincts were discharged and one could thus lead a healthy and productive life.

When these societies collapsed and there were no means and no drive to punish the errants, women were given free choise of mates and unchecked breeding produced by every generation lower quality people until indolence and stupidity made them no longer able to bear the burden of civilized living. What I'm saying makes sense even among lower animals: have you noticed how bitches tend to choose the most aggressive mate whenever they are given the choice. If that happens by a number of generations, the end result is an animal too dangerous to live among humans. Aggressivity is passed and enhanced, until the species returns to its natural wolf-like default. The same is true among humans and the failing standards of education in the past 50 years, when sexual selection has become a norm, is sufficient proof for the truth of my statement...

Do you understand?

Morality, which means to its core refrain on one's instincts, is a necessity in EVERY civilization.

Ok. But many of us think that morality should be determined by function. How do you respond? Where does yours come from?

[QUOTE]I am glad that you acknowledge morality to be a semitic concept!
I don't know where you got that from... If that were true, then you should better join the croud of Jew-worshipers.

Morality is a concept which is tied in with religion, especially that of the xtian which is an alien and semitic religion not fit for Aryankind.

Morality, which means to its core refrain on one's instincts, is a necessity in EVERY civilization. In the absense of morality, society implodes into a chimp-like fission-fusion order where the arbitrary rules: whatever effective is good. Even though EVERY civilization has had its moral values, they were by no means identical. The morality of Akkadians and Romans couldn't be more different. A couple of basic things, however, are shared because they were dictated by a similar necessity: laws against killings, theft or adultery.

You are equating morality with values. There are no fixed values, no absolutes.
You have not stated how these morals or values should be formulated or imposed. What is the basis of them, their origin?
Laws against theft or murder are more to do with utility and exist for this reason rather than from some pious nebulous reason.

In both societies (the former being Semitic, the latter being Aryan), virginity was expected for a bride and marriage was a contract between families. What was the necessity behind these laws? They relieved society from the time other animals spend in trying to find and secure a mate, it created an environment where instincts were discharged and one could thus lead a healthy and productive life.

It has more to do with viewing women as a disposeable commodity. Now that is a semitic concept!

When these societies collapsed and there were no means and no drive to punish the errants, women were given free choise of mates and unchecked breeding produced by every generation lower quality people until indolence and stupidity made them no longer able to bear the burden of civilized living. What I'm saying makes sense even among lower animals: have you noticed how bitches tend to choose the most aggressive mate whenever they are given the choice. If that happens by a number of generations, the end result is an animal too dangerous to live among humans. Aggressivity is passed and enhanced, until the species returns to its natural wolf-like default. The same is true among humans and the failing standards of education in the past 50 years, when sexual selection has become a norm, is sufficient proof for the truth of my statement...

There is nothing at all wrong with women choosing the stronger man as a mate. It ensures that only the very fittest breed. I would encourage not discourage this process. Aggression is a commodity that we are a little short of as a race thanks to xtianity and easy living. We have become emasculated as a gender and race.

Do you understand?

I understand that you are confused about morals and I am still waiting for you to clarify their origins and basis.

Aherne's post is stupid. He's calling women "bitches" and saying women should be forced to mate with someone, even if he's an ugly scrawny berk.

Ego Temptress- Aherne is a dish best served on ignore. That is if you are a women, or you LIKE them, at all.

Ok. But many of us think that morality should be determined by function.
If morality should be determined by function (effectiveness) then our enemies should be acknowledged as moral (!) given that effectiveness is their strongest point. Just see how a whole world is debasing itself to please a minority of venal parasites (the Jew). If that isn't effective, then tell me what is? So I find no reason why you aren't worshipping Jews allready...

How do you respond? Where does yours come from?
One must first draw distinction between morality (social norms) and virtue (personal norms). Being a law abidding citizen, upholding the law, causing no hindrance to others (while returning twice the amount if someone decides to harm you) are basic notions of morality. Without virtue, however, morality rules by slavishness (since it comes from the ones in power), conformity (since everyone claims to do it) and fear (since prison is to be avoided). Virtue imbues morality with a sense of purpose: for example, even if today it would be lawful here to rat on anti-semitic activists, I would NEVER uphold the law on that particular aspect. My conscience is the ultimate forum that decides what is to be followed.

The morality of slaves brings them down like a yoke. They want to eat, drink, sleep and fuck all day long, but authority denies them, therefore they feel frustrated. Morality for superior man comes as normal (believe me on that one) as a dog scratching his back to get rid of a flea. It is a manifestation of virtue, which in turn comes from hightened conscience, from a constant need for spiritual self-perfection, from a state of tension and absolute vigilence you keep yourself into in order to retain and enhance your integrity. The outcome of this state is to achieve through insight and valor the closest thing of being a God: all knowing and serene.

Ego Temptress said:
Aherne's post is stupid. He's calling women "bitches" and saying women should be forced to mate with someone, even if he's an ugly scrawny berk.

So many words! Is the dinner ready? Is the floor wiped properly? Is your boyfriend satisfied by your oral abilities? Dayum... Someone should force you wear a hijab and zip your foul mouths shut because you never have anything interesting to say!