View Full Version : Rules for free speech
Randolph
December 15th, 2003, 04:36 PM
There is nothing wrong with having some rules on this site without infringing on anyone's freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak one's mind, to express one's view about any topic of his choosing.
What good is free speech when one's threads and posts are being mucked up with garbage? This forum has not been up and running for very long and already I am embarassed at the mentality of a few who have been posting messages that I figure came from 12-year old with mental problems and must be masturbating to sick pornographic materials. You know the type I am refering to. There is no conflict between restricting the posts of those who refuse to follow at least a minimum standard of decency.
After observing the posts over the last 2 weeks it should come to no suprise to anyone on why there is no white movement.
You know what is embarrassing? Seeing Black muslims (followers of Louis Farrikan) showing more respect to themselves and others than I have seen in the short time I have been on this forum.
no_nomen
December 15th, 2003, 06:12 PM
What good is free speech when one's threads
and posts are being mucked up with garbage?
You know what is embarrassing?
I think Randolph might be embarrassed because he keeps geting caught making "disengenous claims". And more Folks are starting to call him on the carpet for the "little white lies" that he tells.
A very good example can be read in White Life > Homeschooling > Class offering
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=77
Good day, My name is Randolph and I will be willing to teach any white person the science of economics. -snip- After six months, I will guarantee that you will know more about the market and political economy than Alan Greenspan.
Antiochus Epiphanes writes: Mr Randolph, you make a disengenous claim. You know that Alan Greenspan is very well acquainted with the Austrian school of economics! I tender as evidence his essays in Ayn Rand's compilation "The Virtue Of Capitalism." That's one kike that knows his stuff.
Randolph writes: Forget No_nomen, he claims that there is no such thing as economic science.
no nomen writes: Randolph Sir, I was not no_nomen that claimed that. It was Styrkar Nielsen .
Randolph writes: Yes, it is true that someone else claimed that economics is not a science. However, your post immediately after that one supported that claim.
no nomen writes: Another False Claim Sir: The support was clearly given to the statment that: "Its when it (Economics) becomes a con job that it becomes a science to keep people from figuring it out.
Randolph keeps on getting caught telling "little white lies" and that sure is embarrassing indeed!
.
Randolph
December 15th, 2003, 06:43 PM
Yes, I will admit that I have made some errors in writing. So what? I have not bothered to spend time to correct my posts prior to submission. And why bother? I have No_nomen as my personal editor.
Yes, Alan Greenspan is well acquainted with the Austrian School of Economics. But that does not mean that he understands it. His monetary policy is proof of that. Here are some articles from Austrians critical of Greenspan (note there are over 82 to chose from over the last few years):
http://www.mises.org/fullarticle.asp?record=1377&month=62
http://www.mises.org/fullarticle.asp?record=1237&month=56
http://www.mises.org/fullarticle.asp?record=906&month=42
"no nomen writes: Another False Claim Sir: The support was clearly given to the statment that: "Its when it (Economics) becomes a con job that it becomes a science to keep people from figuring it out. ""
I accept your correction. Misunderstandings can and do occur in forums.
Now that you have stated that economics can be a science, lets start there. Tell me, what is economics?
no_nomen
December 15th, 2003, 08:07 PM
Yes, I will admit that I have made some errors in writing.
"no nomen writes: Another False Claim Sir: The support was clearly
given to the statment that: "Its when it (Economics) becomes a
con job that it becomes a science to keep people from figuring it out. ""
I accept your correction.
Now that you have stated that economics can be a science...
You know, your "errors in writing" sure are getting to be
plentiful for an "economic sientist". As written above:
"I think Randolph might be embarrassed because he keeps
geting caught making "disengenous claims". And more Folks
are starting to call him on the carpet for the "little white lies"
that he tells."
Again you state that no nomen stating that economics
is a science. And yet you know that no nomem has not
stated that!
You just quoted no nomen stating the no nomen does
support the statment that:
"Its when it (Economics) becomes a con job that it
becomes a science to keep people from figuring it out."
I agree with Styrkar Nielsen that economics can be a
sience of conning people. And as stated:
"Randolph keeps on getting caught telling "little white lies"
and that sure is embarrassing indeed!".
.
Rob Roy MacGregor
December 15th, 2003, 09:07 PM
I've enjoyed Randolph's Writing.
Just my personal free-speech opinion.
You know, your "errors in writing" sure are getting to be
plentiful for an "economic sientist". As written above:
"I think Randolph might be embarrassed because he keeps
geting caught making "disengenous claims". And more Folks
are starting to call him on the carpet for the "little white lies"
that he tells."
Again you state that no nomen stating that economics
is a science. And yet you know that no nomem has not
stated that!
You just quoted no nomen stating the no nomen does
support the statment that:
"Its when it (Economics) becomes a con job that it
becomes a science to keep people from figuring it out."
I agree with Styrkar Nielsen that economics can be a
sience of conning people. And as stated:
"Randolph keeps on getting caught telling "little white lies"
and that sure is embarrassing indeed!".
.
no_nomen
December 15th, 2003, 09:35 PM
I've enjoyed Randolph's Writing.
Just my personal free-speech opinion.
R Mac Sir,
Yes indeed! Very illuminating! I look forward to something new every day. And his Randolph's Daily Gold Updates keep us all informed on the market.
Remember the name Randolph. I will be the one
who will be leading the white movement from here on.
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=2269#post2269
.........Buy Gold while the market is hot...
http://www.kitco.com/LFgif/au0060lnb.gif
http://www.kitco.com/LFgif/au0060lnb.gif
...........Help Randolph lead the Herd...
..............................Invest Now !
............Buy High ... Sell Low !
Ossian
December 15th, 2003, 10:04 PM
Randolph,
I may not always agree with your posts, but I find them worth reading, which fact alone makes you a definite minority here, as you note.
I think you should just shamelessly toot your own horn. That is, if you want to, bump your own posts back up to where they will be seen, when necessary.
My own explaination for the voluminous effluence of (ostensibly WN-generated) crappola:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=649
PS: did you know that Jacob Hornberger, head of F.E.E., is a Chosenite?
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.