Log in

View Full Version : Woman gets wrong breasts amputated, using an anti-Semitic scalpel. Surgeon forgets to


Kind Lampshade Maker
February 15th, 2008, 03:26 AM
...trim the beak:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21424046/

Now she has to be careful not to get into a quarrel with somebody. Otherwise she might receive the nickname, "Vienna Flats"

"...Her perception is, 'If I have my breasts taken off, I never have to do this again...''

http://msnbcmedia1.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photo%20-%20story%20level/071022/071022_doublem_vmed_1p.widec.jpg

Stronza
February 15th, 2008, 11:20 AM
Yes, VNN boys, women really ARE stupid nowadays. Very, very, very stupid. They can be talked into anything.

If you cut off both breasts, then whatever cancer the body wants to develop will surely go someplace else.

To think that these creatures are actually permitted to vote. Let's all take that Special Blueberry Kool-Aid now, because I see no hope for the white species.

Kind Lampshade Maker
February 15th, 2008, 02:31 PM
Maybe it's better to not have them lopped off, to keep the cancer in one place and still have the fun of getting them man-handled

Jane_Doe#5
February 15th, 2008, 06:57 PM
That is the dumbest thing I ever heard. ...almost.

Stronza
February 15th, 2008, 07:13 PM
Maybe it's better to not have them lopped off, to keep the cancer in one place and still have the fun of getting them man-handled

Babyhandled is way nicer - and that is why we have them.

IceQueen
February 15th, 2008, 11:14 PM
"The initial tumor already may have sent out seeds to spread to to key organs, Tuttle explained.?

This is why it is of the utmost importance that you order doctors to conduct biopsies outside of your body, after any suspect tumor has been removed! If they ever say, "We're going to biopsy this...." You tell them "Oh no you are not! you will remove it, and then conduct your little tests."

Unless it must be removed, why disturb the thing so it can break open and go in your blood and bones? Then again, if its in an expandable area such as a breast, does anyone have any clue what the survival rate is for people who elect to leave them be completely?

Kind Lampshade Maker
February 16th, 2008, 06:40 AM
Doctors have to make a living. Don't they Queenie?

Babyhandled is way nicer - and that is why we have them.If you were 30 years younger than I, I would consider letting you baby meThat is the dumbest thing I ever heard. ...almost.You've been in this thread so long that you're starting to hear voices

Karen Z.
February 16th, 2008, 07:19 AM
Lampshade you're lucky they don't make me 'board mother', cause I'd suspend yo ass. You are a talking dogman, no more.

Kind Lampshade Maker
February 16th, 2008, 01:04 PM
I would settle for a spanking, even if you would only pretend to be a bored mother

Kind Lampshade Maker
February 17th, 2008, 05:34 AM
The breasts were lopped off by mistake. It wasn't diagnosed with having cancer. The hospital administration mixed up their surgery agenda.
I've once read a study claiming that childless women are highly susceptable for carcinogenic mammory growth. I remember hearing that Niggresses are at higher risk than Whites. Which I find puzzling. Because, Niggresses, on the average, give birth proportionately at a frequent rate, compared to Whites. Perhaps, because of eating chipped lead paint from ghetto walls, as toddlers, while mammy was sleeping off her heroin stupor, is the cause of toxic accumulation in Niggeroe tissue.
Similar events happen to male Whites who do not experience an adequate amount of sex. Their balls tend to get afflicted with carcinogenic growth, when not treated within a reasonable time span can lead to getting them lopped off.
Food for thought: Is a life without breasts or testicles a life worth living? Or are these fates worse than death?