Log in

View Full Version : Why your hate cult is doomed to fail


HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 08:30 AM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with.

Sándor Petőfi
February 17th, 2008, 08:47 AM
Thanks for that razor sharp and thorough analysis. I'm blown away by your insight; I've decided to pack everything up and go sing kumbaya with the nigg ... I mean, with the black people down street.

Frank Toliver
February 17th, 2008, 08:59 AM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with.

Mr. Hatethis, after we get rid of the jews, niggers, spics, and white traitors such as yourself, you won't need to worry about us. The concern is appreciated though.

Darren
February 17th, 2008, 09:04 AM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with.

So you're saying that war and aggression are not the ways in which nations are built? :rofl

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 09:15 AM
Thanks for that razor sharp and thorough analysis. I'm blown away by your insight; I've decided to pack everything up and go sing kumbaya with the nigg ... I mean, with the black people down street.

That's the point! It is as simple minded as you can get.

In fact it has nothing to do withthe mind rather the limbic system - an entirely animal origin anatomy - or as you like to say nigg-, black people

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 09:21 AM
Mr. Hatethis, after we get rid of the jews, niggers, spics, and white traitors such as yourself, you won't need to worry about us. The concern is appreciated though.

Right, so what is it about Channon Christian and Chris Newsoms murderers that is unlike you? thought so. T.N.B.

I thnk your pre-frontal cortex has atrophied.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 09:25 AM
So you're saying that war and aggression are not the ways in which nations are built? :rofl

No I'm not. Externally maybe, internally never.

Darren
February 17th, 2008, 09:26 AM
No I'm not. Externally maybe, internally never.

Your error is in assuming that we live in a valid nation that represents our collective interests. We do not.

Nations are built on the interests of groups asserting themselves over the interests of others, plain and simple.

Frank Toliver
February 17th, 2008, 09:31 AM
Right, so what is it about Channon Christian and Chris Newsoms murderers that is unlike you? thought so. T.N.B.

I thnk your pre-frontal cortex has atrophied.

Channon and Chris never did anything to the niggers who brutalized, mutilated, raped and murdered them. The niggers have murdered and raped untold numbers of whites after they were given more 'rights' than they ever deserved, and after being treated better by white society than their own people treats them. That is the difference. Also, we will not mutilate and torture these groups, but rather deport them if they go quietly.

You hate your own people and culture, yet do not leave for Mogadishu when you have ample opportunities, it is you who are the hypocrite, hater, liar, and mentally challenged one. You have no pity for the 30,000 + white women raped by feral niggers a year, and you come here to try to make us feel guilty for things we have not done, and which were not crimes to begin with.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 09:37 AM
Your error is in assuming that we live in a valid nation that represents our collective interests. We do not.

Nations are built on the interests of groups asserting themselves over the interests of others, plain and simple.

Few nations have been built more than America, by who? THE PEOPLE.

Your error is you think based on your emotions. T.N.B.

MOMUS
February 17th, 2008, 09:37 AM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with.

I presume you base your theory on the history of your own "hate cult". The same internal strife that you describe happened to the jews during the siege of Jerusalem back in 67 AD.

At the siege of Jerusalem the Zealots were not deterred even by the defeat in Galilee and the terrible massacre of their compatriots; their faith in the final victory of the Holy City and its massive walls remained unshaken. But there were too much enmity and strife between them and the ruling body, the Sanhedrin, which they distrusted; and their own leaders were also divided. Instead of working after the clearly mapped-out plan of one powerful leader, they had their forces split up into sections, one under Simon bar Giora, another under Eleazar ben Simon and Simon b. Jair (Ezron), a third under John of Giscala, and a fourth, consisting chiefly of semibarbarous Idumeans, under Jacob ben Sosas and Simon ben Kathla ("B. J." v. 6, §§ 2-3; vi. 1). In order to force the wealthy and more peaceably inclined citizens to action, the Zealots in their fury set fire to the storehouses containing the corn needed for the support of the people during the siege ("B. J." v. 1, § 4).

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=49&letter=Z

The ignorant, selfish, and superstitious jews are not a good example to base your prediction on. They were not White people. Let's look closer in history for a better example. After destroying rebellious party elements in the "night of the long knives" the Nazis were able to unite the German people against the global jewish alliance that sought to destroy them.

Darren
February 17th, 2008, 09:40 AM
Few nations have been built more than America, by who? THE PEOPLE.

Your error is you think based on your emotions. T.N.B.

The America of 200+ years ago (built by the white colonists) is much different than the multicultural liberalized entity of today.

I think based on reason and facts derived from phenomena. It is you who makes excessive appeals to emotion in defending your leftist philosophy.

Darren
February 17th, 2008, 09:45 AM
This is really easy to understand:

America, at the time of its founding, was a government that represented soley the interests of Whites.

America, today, represents the interests of the multicultural rabble along with thew Jews' Marxist and pro-Zionist policies.

Whites who assert a group identity are attacked both by the hordes and by the government.

Whites need a government that represents their interests and values, not the values of Israel, and not the values of the 3rd World.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 09:47 AM
Channon and Chris never did anything to the niggers who brutalized, mutilated, raped and murdered them. The niggers have murdered and raped untold numbers of whites after they were given more 'rights' than they ever deserved, and after being treated better by white society than their own people treats them. That is the difference. Also, we will not mutilate and torture these groups, but rather deport them if they go quietly.

You hate your own people and culture, yet do not leave for Mogadishu when you have ample opportunities, it is you who are the hypocrite, hater, liar, and mentally challenged one. You have no pity for the 30,000 + white women raped by feral niggers a year, and you come here to try to make us feel guilty for things we have not done, and which were not crimes to begin with.

Need more evidence your drug is your hormones?

Christian and Newsoms conduct aren't being questioned here, THEIR MURDERERS ARE.

The rest of your post is a hate-junkies trip. :(

Sándor Petőfi
February 17th, 2008, 09:50 AM
Few nations have been built more than America, by who? THE PEOPLE.

That explains why it's such a shithole.

Your error is you think based on your emotions. T.N.B.


Your error is you don't think. At all.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 09:54 AM
I presume you base your theory on the history of your own "hate cult". The same internal strife that you describe happened to the jews during the siege of Jerusalem back in 67 AD.



http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=49&letter=Z

The ignorant, selfish, and superstitious jews are not a good example to base your prediction on. They were not White people. Let's look closer in history for a better example. After destroying rebellious party elements in the "night of the long knives" the Nazis were able to unite the German people against the global jewish alliance that sought to destroy them.


Only you nuts believe you're under siege by the jews, spics, niggers....and that the American dream doesn't apply to you and your people.

You are your own worst argument. :rolleyes:

Holly
February 17th, 2008, 09:55 AM
* All nations are built on force. Land only belongs to those strong enough to take & hold it.
* "hate" just another jew media buzz word, most of us are filled with pride, respect and love for race, heritage and family.
* Unlike black tribes, whites get along fine when there is no presence and influence of foreign aliens. We can see in Afrika its non stop history of nothing but violence, tribal warfare, starvation and genocides against fellow blacks. What is this place called Dafur about ? Where is the violence to compare this in white society ? Simple it does not exsit, why ? Because we are a cultured species of higher learning, blacks are primitive savages living in mud huts, which you yourself would be if not for fortunate circumstance of being born in a white homeland. Do you have black pride ? Well please go back and show it to your countrymen in Afrika, we will see how long it takes for your head to go in the stew.

Here is your black pride in your native land

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f332/Hollyum/darfur_child_starving.jpg

Sándor Petőfi
February 17th, 2008, 09:58 AM
That's the point! It is as simple minded as you can get.

In fact it has nothing to do withthe mind rather the limbic system - an entirely animal origin anatomy - or as you like to say nigg-, black people

I've spent several minutes trying to decipher this and I'm at a loss.

Here's a simple formula: the one who hates nothing, loves nothing. Hatred is the inborn response to anything which threatens that which one loves.

Darren
February 17th, 2008, 10:00 AM
Only you nuts believe you're under siege by the jews, spics, niggers....and that the American dream doesn't apply to you and your culture.

You are your own worst argument. :rolleyes:

Who says we want the 'American Dream'? I don't even know what that is.

Our dislike of other races in our living space is pretty simple - they do not contribute to a organic social whole. Multiculturalism creates what we have today - globalist markets where individuals are nothing more than economic units of production and consumption. This is because a multicultural society cannot unify on a basis any more closely than that of monetary transactions. Why do you think that the Jews, a people who have built their culture around money, want more and more multiculturalism? Its good for them!

Multiculturalism also turns otherwise safe and prosperous communities into "no-go zones" where one is in fear of rampant crime from immigrants and non-white races.

Need more evidence your drug is your hormones?

Christian and Newsoms conduct aren't being questioned here, THEIR MURDERERS ARE.

The rest of your post is a hate-junkies trip. This is interesting. It is not "emotional" for you to promote your untenable ideas about uniting people under a multicultural banner but it is emotional for Frank to defend Whites, collectively, against the high crime rates and more violence prone behavior of blacks?

Frank Toliver
February 17th, 2008, 10:02 AM
Need more evidence your drug is your hormones?

Christian and Newsoms conduct aren't being questioned here, THEIR MURDERERS ARE.

The rest of your post is a hate-junkies trip. :(

You are one sick individual. Their conduct is not being questioned? No one ever questioned their conduct, they were young college kids who were attacked by nigger animals. What kind of jaundinced mind makes such a staement as you have made? How can you analyze the murder of innocents without bringing the fact that there was no motive whatsoever but the vicious race hatred blacks hold for whites?

And there is no question of what happened to these kids, they were brutally slain by animals. The fact that you won't argue any points; 'The rest of your post is a hate-junkies trip' (hippie slang for I can't dispute the facts) shows that there is no hope for you.

You are just another arrogant little kike taught hypocrite who has no compassion for the suffering of whites, but will cry a river when niggers are brought up on charges they deserve to be prosecuted for. There is no hope for you, the facts are not on your side of the argument, and you are a selfish person.

And don't worry I am not ending this argument with you because I believe you have more valid points, but rather, because your false beliefs are so entrenched that the facts hurt you and so you dismiss them. People like you are the ones who are as dogmatic as religious cultists or evangelical christians, but can't or won't admit it. You cannot see the facts right before your eyes, and thus it is useless to argue with a such a person who will not restrict their arguments to reality based issues, and events.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 10:07 AM
That explains why it's such a shithole.

Your error is you don't think. At all.

Don't you mean to include the UK, Germany, and Canada with your definition of shitholes? Or is Leningrad your idea of heaven on earth.

Your error is that you're too concerned about what other people think about you. And go figure - for an entirely hormonal reward. :rolleyes:

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 10:17 AM
You are one sick individual. Their conduct is not being questioned? No one ever questioned their conduct, they were young college kids who were attacked by nigger animals. What kind of jaundinced mind makes such a staement as you have made? How can you analyze the murder of innocents without bringing the fact that there was no motive whatsoever but the vicious race hatred blacks hold for whites?

And there is no question of what happened to these kids, they were brutally slain by animals. The fact that you won't argue any points; (hippie slang for I can't dispute the facts) shows that there is no hope for you.

You are just another arrogant little kike taught hypocrite who has no compassion for the suffering of whites, but will cry a river when niggers are brought up on charges they deserve to be prosecuted for. There is no hope for you, the facts are not on your side of the argument, and you are a selfish person.

And don't worry I am not ending this argument with you because I believe you have more valid points, but rather, because your false beliefs are so entrenched that the facts hurt you and so you dismiss them. People like you are the ones who are as dogmatic as religious cultists or evangelical christians, but can't or won't admit it. You cannot see the facts right before your eyes, and thus it is useless to argue with a such a person who will not restrict their arguments to reality based issues, and events.

Channon and Chris never did anything to the niggers who brutalized, mutilated, raped and murdered them.

Right, so what is it about Channon Christian and Chris Newsoms murderers that is unlike you? thought so.

Good point...T.N.B.

Sándor Petőfi
February 17th, 2008, 10:19 AM
Don't you mean to include the UK, Germany, and Canada with your definition of shitholes?

Since the advent of American military occupation, yes.

Or is Leningrad your idea of heaven on earth.

You give yourself away, red.

Your error is that you're too concerned about what other people think about you.

That explains why I detest contemporary social norms; because I care what people think about me.

And go figure - for an entirely hormonal reward. :rolleyes:

Speak English, please.

PC}{Magician
February 17th, 2008, 10:26 AM
Your error is you don't think. At all.

He has nothing to use.......:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Karen Z.
February 17th, 2008, 10:35 AM
STFU Jo0D :mad:

J.Hartman
February 17th, 2008, 11:30 AM
You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves,

What WILL happen is the repopulation and rebuilding of the nation, lots of work, several decades worth. Just establishing and rebuilding the schools and education programs in the country will take quite a few years alone.

I have no illusions that there will be a few miscreants/undesireables among us who will need to be dealt with (they will).

Make no mistake....the white man builds and creates.....muds destroy.

This is one engineer looking forward to the hard work......and mostly...the end result of that work.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 11:54 AM
* All nations are built on force. Land only belongs to those strong enough to take & hold it.
* "hate" just another jew media buzz word, most of us are filled with pride, respect and love for race, heritage and family.
* Unlike black tribes, whites get along fine when there is no presence and influence of foreign aliens. We can see in Afrika its non stop history of nothing but violence, tribal warfare, starvation and genocides against fellow blacks. What is this place called Dafur about ? Where is the violence to compare this in white society ? Simple it does not exsit, why ? Because we are a cultured species of higher learning, blacks are primitive savages living in mud huts, which you yourself would be if not for fortunate circumstance of being born in a white homeland. Do you have black pride ? Well please go back and show it to your countrymen in Afrika, we will see how long it takes for your head to go in the stew.
]

So perhaps you can explain to us how it came to be that there are many little tiny country across Europe? THAt was not tribal warfare? Hitler trying to take over HIS neighbors was somehow more justified than African tribes trying to take over THEIR neighbors? Sarajevo was less brutal than Darfur?

The ignorance of your "nation" shows itself with every successive post.

Just like Mr Toliver, stating his hatred for hippies, apparently not realizing that the existence of the internet owes to such visionary hippies as Stuart Brandt and Steve Wozniak.

ben shockley
February 17th, 2008, 12:09 PM
Few nations have been built more than America, by who? THE PEOPLE.

Your error is you think based on your emotions. T.N.B.Hatethis= First year liberal arts student, female, in second rate school beccause of poor academics, not money.

Holly
February 17th, 2008, 12:15 PM
So perhaps you can explain to us how it came to be that there are many little tiny country across Europe? THAt was not tribal warfare? Hitler trying to take over HIS neighbors was somehow more justified than African tribes trying to take over THEIR neighbors? Sarajevo was less brutal than Darfur?

The ignorance of your "nation" shows itself with every successive post.

Just like Mr Toliver, stating his hatred for hippies, apparently not realizing that the existence of the internet owes to such visionary hippies as Stuart Brandt and Steve Wozniak.

I did not say whites do not fight, jew boy.
Obviously we do, and kick some major butt when we do it.
I define a country as a large group of people with common race, language, heritage and customs so yes it took a hot fire to work this out over a 1,000 years in Europe. We have political systems and culture which has stood 100's of years and copied by primitive muds all over the world from music to arts, from court systems to building ... All the hallmarks of great white minds, while niggers live in mud huts and have barly learned to use the wheel, and while jews leech from white populations like the bloodsuckers they are and their home jew state would not survive a month without mass aid and sympathy which you blood suckers need to exist.
So yes you can lay out examples of WW1 WW2 of whites fighting, that was a long time ago mister, there will be eruption of fury and passion in time, please do not compare it with the non stop primitive throat cutters in black lands, a lawless bunch of savages that you apparently admire for reasons only the mind of a jew can think of.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 12:22 PM
Hatethis= First year liberal arts student, female, in second rate school beccause of poor academics, not money.

...I'm sure if you could make an argument, you would :rofl

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 12:28 PM
I did not say whites do not fight, jew boy.
Obviously we do, and kick some major butt when we do it.
I define a country as a large group of people with common race, language, heritage and customs so yes it took a hot fire to work this out over a 1,000 years in Europe. We have political systems and culture which has stood 100's of years and copied by primitive muds all over the world from music to arts, from court systems to building ... All the hallmarks of great white minds, while niggers live in mud huts and have barly learned to use the wheel, and while jews leech from white populations like the bloodsuckers they are and their home jew state would not survive a month without mass aid and sympathy which you blood suckers need to exist.
So yes you can lay out examples of WW1 WW2 of whites fighting, that was a long time ago mister, there will be eruption of fury and passion in time, please do not compare it with the non stop primitive throat cutters in black lands, a lawless bunch of savages that you apparently admire for reasons only the mind of a jew can think of.

So please tell us what you have created, that your great white nation may take pride in...:rofl

Please, do not confuse western innovation and creativity with your middle-aged 'thinking.' Thank you.

Darren
February 17th, 2008, 12:31 PM
So please tell us what you have created, that your great white nation may take pride in...:rofl

Please, do not confuse western innovation and creativity with your middle-aged 'thinking.' Thank you.

There is plenty to choose from!

http://white-history.com/

Our creations are supreme.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 12:35 PM
I've already mentioned that I'm not in fact, Jewish, either by blood or by conversion. Some day I plan to undergo Bar Mitzvah, and move to the Holy Land, but you're not Jewish unless you're Jewish, and right now, I'm not.

I suppose since you morons think of Jews somewhat like vampires, you might as well think of me as a "familiar."

Heck I didn't realize I was a prophet, but you're just proving my point for me. The more you talk, the more your ignorance shows itself.

Music? Get REAL! What has white Europe contributed to music? The Piano? THAT'S about it. Stringed instruments, horns, drums, and all sorts of other musical instruments were in fact borrowed or adapted from other cultures, many of which are actually mentioned EARLIEST in JEWISH culture, in the Tanakh.

Even the music STYLES have benefited from the multiculturalism that you all hate so much. Of course, the likes of Elvis were ripped off of Black Rhythm and Blues singers, and in fact Rock N Roll itself would not be the same without those influences. American music is sought after and loved all over the world, and that is precisely BECAUSE we take our influences from all over the place. Sure, once in a blue moon, a European artist can reach that kind of status, but not often, it's usually as a one-hit wonder, and even still, I could likely find outside influences contributing to the style.

Political systems?

Why the entire American political system is borrowed from previous cultures. It is the EPITOME of multiculturalism.

We have three branches, all of which represent a former political system-

The Judicial and the Executive, are both Jewish forms of government.. The new equivilent of the Kings and panels of Judges which ruled Israel at various times.

The Legislative branch represented their admiration (tempered with apprehension, obviously) for the Greco-Roman notions of democracy/republicanism, which by the way are another shining example of how whites WILL make war on SOMEbody, even if there aren't many non-whites around on which to blame their problems.

Architecture.. Perhaps you don't realize how Masonry traces its roots back through the middle east.. ? Aside from the official organization, the pyramids bear testimony to this, as we still have no idea how such a huge project could have been completed with their technology, and even TODAY could not cut stones so perfectly that we wouldn't need some kind of pitch or mortar.

What else do you have that whites supposedly gave to the world, without other influences?

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 12:40 PM
So please tell us what you have created, that your great white nation may take pride in...:rofl

Please, do not confuse western innovation and creativity with your middle-aged 'thinking.' Thank you.

Disconnect the internet, go outside and chop off the electrical cable, destroy your phone, smash your computer, wreck your fridge, smash your toilet, bend your faucet, hammer the heater, dilapidate the air conditioner, burn your car and set your house on fire.

You have de-Whitened your life, good luck in the mud hut.

Architecture.. Perhaps you don't realize how Masonry traces its roots back through the middle east.. ? Aside from the official organization, the pyramids bear testimony to this, as we still have no idea how such a huge project could have been completed with their technology, and even TODAY could not cut stones so perfectly that we wouldn't need some kind of pitch or mortar.
Do not lie to me you filthy non-human.

Both the Persians and Egyptians were White migrants who settled in those regions.

Music? Get REAL! What has white Europe contributed to music? The Piano? THAT'S about it. Stringed instruments, horns, drums, and all sorts of other musical instruments were in fact borrowed or adapted from other cultures, many of which are actually mentioned EARLIEST in JEWISH culture, in the Tanakh.
Drums exist in all primitive cultures, but there is no second to the military drum.
YouTube - Swiss Army Drum Squad

The fine string instruments have pure European origins, liar. If you weren't aware the first musical instruments were created by Whites circa 27,000 BC

Tracing the origins of the violins is not easy. Instruments played with a bow appear in European carvings and illustrations from around 900 AD, but interpretation is difficult, and the names given for them in texts vary and overlap. Broadly speaking, however, they fall into four categories: the rebec, the medieval and Renaissance fiddle, the lira da braccio and the viol.
Although it is outside the scope of the present paper to consider in detail contributions early stringed instruments may have made towards the evolution of the violin, research by Peter Holman indicates that the violin family emerged between 1495-1505 in Italy. Most histories of the violin tend to rely on iconographical evidence such as visual depictions of the violin in artwork in order to date its beginning. Holman, however, sought to establish the date of the violin's inception by examining how the early violin was used and played. He determined that the first usage of the violin was in a consort. Violin music seems to support Holman's assertion, because the majority of violin literature from the 16th and early 17th century appears to be for violin consorts, and it was not until the mid-17th century that solo repertoire for the violin developed. [9] Neal Zaslaw described who was likely to play the violin during these early years:

in the Tanakh.
And what's this? Using fictional material as proof to your claims?


Here's a summary of your lying dogma.



The "Lux et Orient" or "All light comes from the East" dogma which Christianity introduced, held that all progress and civilization came from the Middle East. With accurate dating methods and intensified archeological research, it has now been shown that advanced civilizations flourished in Europe, sometimes thousands of years before similar technological advances were made in the Middle East.

EUROPE AND THE MIDDLE EAST - EQUALLY ADVANCED

The existence of an original civilization on the continent of Europe which predates the civilizations in the Middle East, has to a large degree been ignored by traditional history writers, particularly those who wrote during the dominant Christian era in Europe.

This was largely because of a biblical Judeo-Christian bias which held that all civilization started in the Near East (the biblical Old Testament deals exclusively with events in the Middle East, and conventional wisdom during the Age of the Church held that the Garden of Eden was in the Middle East).

This is not an accurate reflection of the facts, as in many parts of Europe relatively advanced societies were in existence either before or simultaneously with the Mesopotamian or Egyptian civilizations.

While it is most certainly true that the great cities and states in the near and Middle East were towering achievements, it is incorrect to regard them as the only flowering of civilization in the world at that time.

There are many huge buildings - called megaliths - and early Neolithic settlements, artifacts and burial sites and even the creation of a form of writing, which show that the inhabitants of Europe were advanced in the evolution of their societies and culture.

This Old European civilization lasted for approximately 3000 years, and then fell before waves of new invaders, the Indo-European or Nordic tribes sweeping in from the area we now know as Russia.

ben shockley
February 17th, 2008, 12:41 PM
...I'm sure if you could make an argument, you would :rofl
Your second rate composition, and combined use of liberal buzzwords give you away. Only you will fade away as you spread your legs for the nigger and create orange fro'd and freckled offspring.
http://www.spottie.net/sleepiekaren/albino_lovin.jpg

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 01:05 PM
Disconnect the internet, go outside and chop off the electrical cable, destroy your phone, smash your computer, wreck your fridge, smash your toilet, bend your faucet, hammer the heater, dilapidate the air conditioner, burn your car and set your house on fire.

You have de-Whitened your life, good luck in the mud hut.

If you have greater than a 5th grade education you would realize I questioned her productivity - my point was to distinguish her rhetoric from the productive, non-hating white demography.

btw, those inventions you mention were invented and developed by white people with strong work ethics and not obsessed with hatred - the very people you describe as lemmings today - and would murder tomorrow. T.N.B.

Boy it's getting dumb in here, even for nazis.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 01:06 PM
So, psycho, as I prepare my sources, I must ask, do YOU have any sources for this "information" or is the fact that you quoted SOMEbody supposed to suffice?

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 01:08 PM
If you have greater than a 5th grade education you would realize I questioned her productivity - my point was to distinguish her rhetoric from the productive, non-hating white demography.

btw, those inventions you mention were invented and developed by white people with strong work ethics and not obsessed with hatred - the very people you describe as lemmings today - and would murder tomorrow. T.N.B.

Boy it's getting dumb in here, even for nazis.

Oh! Buurn! Well said, well said. That's GOTTA hurt.. Oh, how could it not hurt? Outstanding point.

But.. but.. but... she's making white babies! What nobler work could there BE? ;)

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 01:14 PM
Oh! Buurn! Well said, well said. That's GOTTA hurt.. Oh, how could it not hurt? Outstanding point.

But.. but.. but... she's making white babies! What nobler work could there BE? ;)

lol, white babies, and dinner. :rofl

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 01:19 PM
Bla bla bla bla


Tesla greatly disliked Jews and idiots like yourself Don't dally and chop the line already. I don't want to see you here.



Boy it's getting dumb in here, even for nazis.

I find it amazing how Liberal cunts do the same thing they accuse everyone else of doing- generalization.

Mister Orwell said it well:
" The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them . . . . To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth"


So, psycho, as I prepare my sources, I must ask, do YOU have any sources for this "information" or is the fact that you quoted SOMEbody supposed to suffice?
Before you do so I must warn you that bullshit sources aren't accepted, he said she said is something we do not do here so if you are going to quote I expect to see actual evidence not documentation from fiction. A Bible is fiction so don't bother if that's what you're citing.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 01:28 PM
You didn't really answer the question.

ARE you prepared to cite sources for your information?

It seems to me all I would need to prove is the approximate AGE of the Bible, not the truth of its contents.

If a text which predates European instruments mentions the instruments you claim they invented, then clearly the claim has no merit.

A. Black
February 17th, 2008, 01:36 PM
Channon and Chris never did anything to the niggers who brutalized, mutilated, raped and murdered them. The niggers have murdered and raped untold numbers of whites after they were given more 'rights' than they ever deserved, and after being treated better by white society than their own people treats them. That is the difference. Also, we will not mutilate and torture these groups, but rather deport them if they go quietly.

You hate your own people and culture, yet do not leave for Mogadishu when you have ample opportunities, it is you who are the hypocrite, hater, liar, and mentally challenged one. You have no pity for the 30,000 + white women raped by feral niggers a year, and you come here to try to make us feel guilty for things we have not done, and which were not crimes to begin with.

Mr. Toliver may hate my guts, but the fact of the matter is, when it comes to what he is saying about these two completely innocent kids, what happened to them, and the lack of media coverage, to go along with the perceived upcoming preferential treatment which will be more than likely given to these murdering creatures, everything he is saying is absolutely correct. Anyone who refutes it, is a fool with their head in the sand. Wake up!

And I'm black! UnT.N.B.

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 01:40 PM
You didn't really answer the question.

ARE you prepared to cite sources for your information?
Common sense applies here.

Jews have none so you're going to have to keep wondering where in the world those magical words came from.


It seems to me all I would need to prove is the approximate AGE of the Bible, not the truth of its contents.
Really? Jews claim that Jesus was a Jew by the first 5 "chapters" of the Bible yet its not until 12 or so that the word even appears and even then it's in the Bible version which was edited during the Renaissance.

Does a piece of fiction citing the existence of an object necessarily mean that the object exists? Hover cars were thought of many years ago . Do these pieces of fiction mean the flying car existed then or exists now ? Best yet, if you have someone editing this fiction when there are hover cars (Say 200 years later) does that mean hover cars originated in the early 1900's? What if say there was no hover car in this fiction whatsoever and it was put in 2200 just for credibility's sake? Does that make the hover car 300 years old when in reality it was say invented 100 years prior to that? You see, relying on fiction makes no sense because fiction can be safely edited as it has no real facts that it must respect.

If a text which predates European instruments mentions the instruments you claim they invented, then clearly the claim has no merit.
No it's simply fiction and I really couldn't care less when it came to be, but you're free to cite some stories to me, for my entertainment.

brutus
February 17th, 2008, 01:48 PM
What else do you have that whites supposedly gave to the world, without other influences?
You'd better get with the program if you're planning on becoming a member of the tribe.

Everyone here fully realizes that niggers invented everything. The niggers even invented jews. Bow down to your god - the almighty niggly wiggly. Want proof? Just walk into any inner city nigger's ghetto flat and you'll see a picture of nigger Jesus at the last supper feasting on fat back and chitlins.

Also...........

Everyone here knows that jew woman have black cut lips. Actually they have only one hole between their legs and everything voids out through that hole. New jew babies, fecal matter, menstrual blood clots and mysterious things of unknown origin. This is the real reason why jew women are so painfully neurotic and why they make their men wear those gay little yarmulkes.

I bet that you didn't know that rabbis are selected for their positions because they can walk and chew circumcised foreskin at the same time.

Yes indeed, jews and niggers go together like a cornstudded turd.

.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 02:00 PM
Now what would be the point of that, psycho?

You've offered NOTHING in the way of evidence, but putting your words into QUOTES is supposed to make it more believable?

I, on the other hand, DO have evidence, but you've already stated you aren't willing to consider it. If you're not willing to let reality get in the way of your beliefs, then my point is proven without even opening google.

No, actually Yeshua ("Jesus" is little better than a slave name) was eating matzah (unleavened bread), and lamb, since the last supper was a Passover Seder.

Hatred is nothing new, Brutus, and it doesn't really bother me. It further proves the prophecies of the Bible, in all reality. Not only does it show the truth of G-d's children being persecuted, but in the various times that persecution has happened on a large scale, it also shows that though He will allow His children to suffer, He will never allow them to be destroyed. If it were not as I say, it would have happened long ago.

No matter how much a being may rebel against his creator, all things, good and evil, give glory to the One True G-d.. if not through their submission, then through their rebellion.

So continue slinging mud, if that's what it takes to make you feel like a big man. You can stick to your blond white women. They all look alike to me, anyway.

;)

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 02:07 PM
Now what would be the point of that, psycho?
You know this is one of the simple reasons I prefer Whites with a fervor.


You've offered NOTHING in the way of evidence, but putting your words into QUOTES is supposed to make it more believable?
I don't think it's necessary to quote known sources for common information, no.


I, on the other hand, DO have evidence, but you've already stated you aren't willing to consider it. If you're not willing to let reality get in the way of your beliefs, then my point is proven without even opening google.
Reality =/= Fiction
What next? Red is Green?
We've seen dozens of Jews just like you on this forum, your avoidance of actual arguments is nothing new. Most of your brothers deny being Jewish/Zionist just like you, in fact I think I can conjure up only a few names that admit to being Jewish Zionists and they are much more manic than you. Quite amazing considering how every Jew has a Holocaust survivor friend/family member and you'd be hard pressed to find one who doesn't have either that or a feeling of belonging to Israel. Even Jews like Finklestein fit the mold, and he is a most pure Mark Twain.

Hatred is nothing new, Brutus, and it doesn't really bother me. It further proves the prophecies of the Bible, in all reality. Not only does it show the truth of G-d's children being persecuted, but in the various times that persecution has happened on a large scale, it also shows that though He will allow His children to suffer, He will never allow them to be destroyed. If it were not as I say, it would have happened long ago.
I find weak religions pathetic, and even more so do I think them pitiful when they attempt to pity those who feel it necessary to tell those religions to go take a hike.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 02:18 PM
Missed this earlier-

Really? Jews claim that Jesus was a Jew by the first 5 "chapters" of the Bible yet its not until 12 or so that the word even appears and even then it's in the Bible version which was edited during the Renaissance.

I don't follow you. Jesus isn't mentioned until 60+ books in, so what is there in Genesis that has anything to do with His lineage?

We say that He was a Jew based on the ancestry given for Maryam and Yosef in the Synaptic Gospels.

And it was the Christian church that kept fiddling with their Bible. The Jewish Bible has remained the same, as it NEEDS no translation. Aside from liberal Jews, it is a major tenet of Judaism that Jewish children do learn to read and speak Hebrew, in order to read the ORIGINAL Bible, not a copy of a copy of a copy, as so many Christian churches are content to do.

You know this is one of the simple reasons I prefer Whites with a fervor.

This is another seemingly endless source of amusement for me. I refuse to answer my race, and the racists just can't accept that. They assume different things, but they HAVE to assume SOMETHING, so that they can throw racial slurs at me, either that I'm a race traitor if they assume I AM white, or something worse if they assume I'm not. Yes, yes, quite amusing... It's like y'all just can't STAND not knowing what color my skin is, and I love it. (No, the use of "y'all" tells you whereabouts I'm from, not what race:) )

I don't think it's necessary to quote known sources for common information, no.

Right. Like I said, it doesn't matter if facts back you up or not, if it makes sense to you, that's all that matters to you. You would prefer convenient seductive lies to ugly truths. That's your call, of course.

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 02:31 PM
I don't follow you. Jesus isn't mentioned until 60+ books in, so what is there in Genesis that has anything to do with His lineage?
I am quite apathetic to Jesus' origins but if we must then it's simple- Jesus was from Galilea and the Edomites did not settle this area until many years after his supposed Death. Judea is a region, not a race and those who claim to be from there are Judeans just as someone from France is French but is ethnically a Frank. Jesus later in his life stayed in Galilea out of fear of the Jewish tribes murdering him in Judea.


This is another seemingly endless source of amusement for me. I refuse to answer my race, and the racists just can't accept that. They assume different things, but they HAVE to assume SOMETHING, so that they can throw racial slurs at me, either that I'm a race traitor if they assume I AM white, or something worse if they assume I'm not. Yes, yes, quite amusing... It's like y'all just can't STAND not knowing what color my skin is, and I love it. (No, the use of "y'all" tells you whereabouts I'm from, not what race:) )

Just don't expect the Jews to have much interest in you. Jews are very lineage-based and its a known fact that they look at converts as lesser beings, sometimes not even Jews. Judaism is a religion of racial worship so it makes little sense to be "accepting" and as we know the Jews don't have missions (With perhaps a few doubtable exceptions) and they are rarely seen doing any sort of humanitarian work, only telling others to do it.


Right. Like I said, it doesn't matter if facts back you up or not, if it makes sense to you, that's all that matters to you. You would prefer convenient seductive lies to ugly truths. That's your call, of course.
The Holocaust didn't happen, do I need a thousand sources to prove this or just common sense to tell me that bodies don't burn like paper?

Dietrich
February 17th, 2008, 02:31 PM
Music? Get REAL! What has white Europe contributed to music? The Piano? THAT'S about it.

Whites invented music as we know it today. From Pythagoras with the 12-tone scale to Thomas Dolby with electronic synths.

Even the music STYLES have benefited from the multiculturalism that you all hate so much. Of course, the likes of Elvis were ripped off of Black Rhythm
Not so fast. Jazz and Blues have their genesis in big-band, ragtime, and from there, going back to Irish folk music.

We have three branches, all of which represent a former political system-

The Judicial and the Executive, are both Jewish forms of government.. The new equivilent of the Kings and panels of Judges which ruled Israel at various times.

Oh ffs. Our divided government is based on Rome's Pleb Assembly (House) Senate (Senate), and Council (President). Get ahold of yourself man--the founding fathers thought they were re-creating Rome. Jewish political systems are based around charismatic leaders. As with most muds, it's just more tacky big-manism.

Architecture.. Perhaps you don't realize how Masonry traces its roots back through the middle east.. ? Aside from the official organization, the pyramids bear testimony to this, as we still have no idea how such a huge project could have been completed with their technology, and even TODAY could not cut stones so perfectly that we wouldn't need some kind of pitch or mortar.

So much b.s. This over-mystification of the pyramids is evidence that you've watched too many sci-fi movies on TV. They're an astounding accomplishment for what they are, but we know how they were built. It's nice that they were cut so finely, but we again know how the blocks were made.

Moreover, the ancient Egyptians were white at easily 90% the time of the pyramid-building. Cleopatra was "more likely a blonde than a brunette" (said Durant, who did more research than any other man in the modern era). Our architecture comes from (again) the classical civilizations of Greece and Rome. The vault, the dome, the pillar--all classical. For most any big government building in D.C., one can find an analogue in ancient ruins.

Here's something else to burn you up--our residential motifs borrow heavily from central-European (Germanic) peasant-dwellings. Our celebrations of Christmas, stories we tell our children (Hansel/Gretel), and American foods--hotdogs, hamburgers, beer.

What else do you have that whites supposedly gave to the world, without other influences?

Jews basically have no art to call their own. They always took from other styles and made them "ugly," as a small child destroys sandcastles on the beach because that is the only way he can interact with them. See: modern art. Indeed, Jews have really nothing to call their own as they are parasites in every sense of the word. This perhaps is the most tangible of shortcomings the Jew feels (aside from his looks) when in white society. He has no spark of creation. He can only degrade and destroy. Tell us how that makes you feel.

Whites are solely responsible for high art. You have no way around this, and now that I'm watching this thread, you're going to get called out and hammered mercilessly for it. Just wait until I have more than 3 minutes to post something.

Dale VanderMeer
February 17th, 2008, 02:41 PM
Don't you mean to include the UK, Germany, and Canada with your definition of shitholes? Or is Leningrad your idea of heaven on earth.

Your error is that you're too concerned about what other people think about you. And go figure - for an entirely hormonal reward. :rolleyes:

The inner cities of these countries are the "shitholes". The non-White population turns these places into "shitholes" because they feed off of the host peoples. Here is a simple formula for you to understand with your feeble mind:
http://i27.tinypic.com/2lnk1sj.jpg

Plus, it's about eugenics, not "hormones", you fucking idiot.:[]

Hatred is nothing new, Brutus, and it doesn't really bother me. It further proves the prophecies of the Bible, in all reality. Not only does it show the truth of G-d's children being persecuted, but in the various times that persecution has happened on a large scale, it also shows that though He will allow His children to suffer, He will never allow them to be destroyed. If it were not as I say, it would have happened long ago.

Then why did Kissinger say that ""Any group of people who have been persecuted for over 2000 years, must be doing something wrong" ??

Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. X, p. 620, "Gentile" (http://www.honestmediatoday.com/the_Talmud_is_the_Jewish_Oral_Laws.htm)
"It follows that the Gentiles were excepted from the general civil laws of Moses. For example, the Law provides that if a man's ox gores and kills a neighbor's ox, the carcass and surviving ox shall be sold, and the proceeds divided between the respective owners (half-damages). If, however, the goring ox has been known to be dangerous and its owner has not kept watch over it, he shall pay full damages for the dead ox and take the carcass (Ex. xxi, 35-36, Hebr.). Here the Gentile is excepted, as he is not a 'neighbor' in the sense of reciprocating and being responsible for damages caused by his negligence; nor does he keep watch over his cattle. Even the best Gentile laws were too crude to admit of reciprocity. . . . The Mishnah, bearing such facts in mind, therefore declares that if a Gentile sue an Israelite, the verdict is for the defendant; if the Israelite is the plaintiff, he obtains full damages (Baba Kamma iv, 3). . . .

"The Mosaic law provides for the restoration of a lost article to its owner if a 'brother' and 'neighbor' (Deut. xxii, 1-3), but not if a Gentile (Baba Kamma 113b). . . .

"Similarly, the mandate concerning the oppression of or withholding wages from a hireling brother or neighbor, or a domiciled alien (Deut. xxiv, 14-15) who observes the Noachian laws, is not applicable in the case of a Gentile. This is to say a Gentile may be employed at reduced wages, which need not be paid promptly on the same day, but may be paid in accordance with the usual custom of the place. .


So much for the "religion of equality".:rolleyes:
Who are the real haters? T.J.B.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 02:43 PM
You can take the Pepsi challenge, too.

Are YOU willing to match source for source? Cause I KNOW I'm not going to have to rely on those that share my ideology to prove MY case. The classifications of musical instruments we continue to teach children today were all FIRST recorded in Jewish history. This is not a guess, I'm prepared to prove it, if I'm not spending 1/2 hour just to shoot fish in a barrel, anyway.

Dietrech- Is it your position, then, that the panel of judges came from Rome or elsewhere, or are you prepared to admit that this form of government was EARLIEST recorded in the annals of Jewish history?

I'm curious- what is "high art"? The term itself seems to a futile attempt to apply science to art, to refer to more and less evolved forms of art, when art itself is, of course, completely subjective.

Yes, I'm well aware of Pythagorus' contributions, but being Meditteranean, were you to see him in your white supremacist utopia, you would likely have killed him before he'd had the chance.

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 02:51 PM
Yes, I'm well aware of Pythagorus' contributions, but being Meditteranean, were you to see him in your white supremacist utopia, you would likely have killed him before he'd had the chance.
Отморозок is a perfect word to describe you.

A degenerate who is completely ignorant to history and racial subtypes. An Arabic mix which is now a Portugese or the common Greek is not what Pythagoras was, you despicable,ignorant moron.


You can take the Pepsi challenge, too.

Are YOU willing to match source for source? Cause I KNOW I'm not going to have to rely on those that share my ideology to prove MY case. The classifications of musical instruments we continue to teach children today were all FIRST recorded in Jewish history. This is not a guess, I'm prepared to prove it, if I'm not spending 1/2 hour just to shoot fish in a barrel, anyway.
I am really just tired of bullshit, you're making a lot of promises but I am not seeing anything. Any one of my comrades could list my sources within a few moments time but you prefer to pretend to be ignorant. It's not an obscure journal which only I have subscription to even though I could have used that but I didn't for the sake of keeping it fair.

A. Black
February 17th, 2008, 03:02 PM
Only you nuts believe you're under siege by the jews, spics, niggers....and that the American dream doesn't apply to you and your people.
You are your own worst argument. :rolleyes:

Question.

How can The "American Dream" apply to them too, if they as a group, are exclusively, and disproportionately being targeted for most of the murder, rape, and robbery before ever having a chance to acheive it?

Wake Up!

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 03:06 PM
Dale- I'm not here to defend Jewish Orthodoxy. I do not associate with the Orthodox. BUT that said, your ignorance of the basic NATURE of the Talmud is shown in the fact that you don't bother to include WHICH Rabbi said these things. The Talmud is, of course, a DISCOURSE, a discussion AMONG Rabbis, which usually disagreed with one another. Thus it is not possible to consider the whole of the Talmud to be the ultimate rule to live by, since it is not possible to agree with all the Rabbis on all the points of discussion.

Psycho-

I'll take that to mean "No, I don't have sources." Consider it a standing offer. I'm ready whenever you are.

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 03:11 PM
Psycho-

I'll take that to mean "No, I don't have sources." Consider it a standing offer. I'm ready whenever you are.

No I mean that you're too much an idiot to take one of my quotes and type it into google.

This is typical behavior- I assume this, I assume that. Honestly, I doubt you'd live a day without doublethink and it's rather ironic you have an Orwell quote in your signature considering that all you do is attempt to deceive.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 03:35 PM
You don't need me. You've defeated yourself, here.

You expect me to argue my OWN side of the debate, and then to chase down YOUR sources, too? How lazy can you get?

You don't seem to see how you've painted yourself into a corner here.

Either you're using racist sources, which probably won't care that you don't give them credit for their work, OR you're using outside sources, which more likely than not AREN'T part of your neo-nazi-ism, and probably wouldn't be too happy at ALL to see that you've done it to them.

Either way, if you can't be bothered to source your own material, I'll take a pass. I DO have internet, after all, so obviously if I just wanted to play with myself, I wouldn't need to come HERE to do it. :rofl

psychologicalshock
February 17th, 2008, 03:45 PM
You don't need me. You've defeated yourself, here.
LOL



You expect me to argue my OWN side of the debate, and then to chase down YOUR sources, too? How lazy can you get?
How lazy can YOU get? Darren has cited my source multiple times, it just shows that you don't actually read anything written here, just assume a few things some TV documentary told you.


You don't seem to see how you've painted yourself into a corner here.
You have yet to argue any of my propositions or points, you're just boasting about how great a Jew you are. Well congrats


Either you're using racist sources, which probably won't care that you don't give them credit for their work, OR you're using outside sources, which more likely than not AREN'T part of your neo-nazi-ism, and probably wouldn't be too happy at ALL to see that you've done it to them.
Doublethink
You're really just justifying that there is no point in citing sources, your response is the same cited or not. "This source isn't Liberal so I will ignore it", am I to think you'll ignore it any less the second time than the first?

That and it's really not my fault you don't have common sense. Did the Torah teach you that? 2+2= 5 and don't forget it pre-Kikes!

How many times do I have to tell you I am not a nazi?

Either way, if you can't be bothered to source your own material, I'll take a pass. I DO have internet, after all, so obviously if I just wanted to play with myself, I wouldn't need to come HERE to do it. :rofl
Not my fault you have poor reading skills.

faceless
February 17th, 2008, 04:08 PM
I'm not here to defend Jewish Orthodoxy.

Well, you should, and that's quite easy . It is much harder to defend the Nazi mob.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 04:18 PM
Well, you should, and that's quite easy . It is much harder to defend the Nazi mob.

*shrug* Sorry, but I'd say the same thing to them. I don't see how you can claim a work to the authoritative Word of G-d, if in fact it contains conflicting opinions. It doesn't make sense to me, thus I identify most closely with the Conservatives, who ARE quite strict in doing ALL that G-d asks us to do... but don't extend that to the directives of the Rabbis.

Not even a chuckle? *best Brooklyn Jew accent* Eh, what do you know for funny?

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 05:36 PM
The inner cities of these countries are the "shitholes". The non-White population turns these places into "shitholes" because they feed off of the host peoples. Here is a simple formula for you to understand with your feeble mind:
http://i27.tinypic.com/2lnk1sj.jpg

Plus, it's about eugenics, not "hormones", you fucking idiot.:[]



One problem with your simplistic equation, New York today looks like the first picture - after Jewliani cleaned it up

Plus, neurophysiology goes right over your (fucking) head, genius.

Holly
February 17th, 2008, 05:41 PM
I am quite apathetic to Jesus' origins but if we must then it's simple- Jesus was from Galilea and the Edomites did not settle this area until many years after his supposed Death.

I will only point out the obvious and say that Jesus was of divine conception so the place of birth does not have to be ethnic, at all. Of course some will say the whole thing is just a fairy tale but really, if we have a guy who father is supposed to be a God from heaven does it really stretch the mind to think his son will be no common man ?

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 05:50 PM
Question.

How can The "American Dream" apply to them too, if they as a group, are exclusively, and disproportionately being targeted for most of the murder, rape, and robbery before ever having a chance to acheive it?

Wake Up!

Exclusively targeted for 'most of the murder...' - this is a contradiction
Disproportionately? Blacks disproportionately murder, rape, and rob other blacks.

If a black person can rise-up from the ghetto and divorce the thug life, and become a multi-million dollar stock broker, so can the white.

You know, Anthony Robbins, Jack Canfield, Mark Victor Hansen and Wayne Dyer have positively influenced far more (disproportionately white) people to achieve succes than your personality cult leader Alex Linder. T.N.B.

Grow up!

brutus
February 17th, 2008, 06:11 PM
RE: Matityahu

Hatred is nothing new, Brutus, and it doesn't really bother me. It further proves the prophecies of the Bible, in all reality.
Who's being hateful?

Don't have a sense of humor? Why are you so painfully uptight? Lighten-up a bit. Smell the flowers, hold a puppy, do something nice for a senior citizen but for Pete's sake lose the anal. This is only the internet you know.

You come waltzing in here, knowing full well that this is a White racist forum and then you hear what is to be expected and you fall on the ground and feign indignation......How histrionic is that? Tallulah Bankhead never acted so lame.

BTW: Wrapping yourself in a moth-eaten coat of self-righteousness doesn't play too well here. Phony baloney itz along with your canned pseudo histories.

I have to change the channel. It's dullsville, man.

.

Dietrich
February 17th, 2008, 06:18 PM
You can take the Pepsi challenge, too.

Are YOU willing to match source for source? Cause I KNOW I'm not going to have to rely on those that share my ideology to prove MY case. The classifications of musical instruments we continue to teach children today were all FIRST recorded in Jewish history. This is not a guess, I'm prepared to prove it, if I'm not spending 1/2 hour just to shoot fish in a barrel, anyway.

You've back-peddled to mere classifications? This is a linguistic term, not a musical one. Well? What are you waiting for?

Dietrech- Is it your position, then, that the panel of judges came from Rome or elsewhere, or are you prepared to admit that this form of government was EARLIEST recorded in the annals of Jewish history?

A "panel of judges" is not a form of government. A governing system that may or may not a judiciary function is. As per the Constitution, the U.S. is (supposed to be) a Republic, which is an anglicization of the Latin Res Publica (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_publica), or, "A public matter." This is an essential difference between the U.S., Rome, and indeed the western tradition, and what is thought of as 'Jewish forms of governance.'

Jews, if by only the nature of being Jews, are far less individualistic. Jewish leadership arises from the charismatic talker rather than the guy leading from the front. The Jewish intellectual stance is one of "Dogmatism; Submission to
Ingroup Authority and Charismatic Leaders. (http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/WesternOrigins.htm)" These two forms are incompatible.

I'm curious- what is "high art"? The term itself seems to a futile attempt to apply science to art, to refer to more and less evolved forms of art, when art itself is, of course, completely subjective.

Art isn't completely subjective. Jews would like to think so, but it simply is not. There are things we can say about art.

From Gardner's "Art Through the Ages," 10th ed. pg. 598:

It is clear that most African peoples make no distinction between "fine" and "applied" art or crafts, and non will be made here. Until recently, too, most African peoples have not isolated visual arts into a distinct conceptual category, as suggested by the absence of a word in most African languages that translates accurately into the English word art.

In other words, you have hair beads or vicious-looking tribal masks, and you have the Sistine Chapel. Are you paying attention?

Yes, I'm well aware of Pythagorus' contributions, but being Meditteranean, were you to see him in your white supremacist utopia, you would likely have killed him before he'd had the chance.

If you want to be able to understand/make fun of/hate ordinary Whites who assert their political rights as do blacks, browns, and Jews, you should at least try to get an accurate representation of what WN is. Only Jews say that "Hitler wanted to kill everyone who wasn't blonde-haired/blue-eyed."

Also, there is no indication that Pythagoras was a Med. (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Pythagoras_Bust_Vatican_Museum.jpg) The casual assumption that Pythagoras was a Med reveals that you lack even a very basic grasp on the general arc of western history. The ancient Greeks were not as dark as they are today. Same with the Romans. Now, here's a teaching moment for you: Both civilizations went downhill when they were infected with Eastern philosophies (like Judeo-Christianity) and Eastern racial types. Greece and Rome changed because the Greeks and Romans changed.

Of one your own tribesmen said that race was the key to history. The collapse of these once-great civilizations are monumental lessons against racemixing. Rome was a stalwart and moral republic when it was ruled and inhabited by people of this racial type:

http://antiquities.blogs.com/antiquities/images/artemis_and_stag.jpg
Goddess Diana, probably 3rd century BCE

It changed when it was inhabited by this type:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/11/Pompeii-couple.jpg
Pompeian mural, early 1st century CE

Even though it was still ruled by people who looked like this:

http://www.vroma.org/images/mcmanus_images/augustanprince2.jpg
Caesar Agustus, early 1st century CE

One will be able to see the same thing thousands of years from now with regard to the U.S.:

Going
http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/wong/badassp/gwashington1.jpg

Going
http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/wong/badassp/troosevelt3.jpg

Gone
http://www.nogw.com/images/chertoff2.jpg

Troy Alexander
February 17th, 2008, 06:19 PM
Exclusively targeted for 'most of the murder...' - this is a contradiction
Disproportionately? Blacks disproportionately murder, rape, and rob other blacks.

If a black person can rise-up from the ghetto and divorce the thug life, and become a multi-million dollar stock broker, so can the white.

You know, Anthony Robbins, Jack Canfield, Mark Victor Hansen and Wayne Dyer have positively influenced far more (disproportionately white) people to achieve succes than your personality cult leader Alex Linder. T.N.B.

Grow up!

You're a fucking scummy Jew, Hate this. Why are you so angry? your girlfriend may have a cavernous hole between her legs and a saggy wrinky belly, but i don't think you should take this out on the pure.

HateThis
February 17th, 2008, 06:54 PM
You're a fucking scummy Jew, Hate this. Why are you so angry? your girlfriend may have a cavernous hole between her legs and a saggy wrinky belly, but i don't think you should take this out on the pure.

Within a white pride forum, and within a thread topic that challenges the core of your reason for existing, all you can do is guess what I am?

Poor you. You've become so accustomed to the moral depravity of this ideology, with all the wishful itz coming murder talk that the critical thinking gyrus of your brain has been rendered feckless. Your (as everybody here) abnormal has become your normal.

Just like a porn actor, or a prostitute, or any ghetto style thug. T.N.B.

A. Black
February 17th, 2008, 08:50 PM
Exclusively targeted for 'most of the murder...' - this is a contradiction Disproportionately? Blacks disproportionately murder, rape, and rob other blacks.

If a black person can rise-up from the ghetto and divorce the thug life, and become a multi-million dollar stock broker, so can the white.

You know, Anthony Robbins, Jack Canfield, Mark Victor Hansen and Wayne Dyer have positively influenced far more (disproportionately white) people to achieve succes than your personality cult leader Alex Linder. T.N.B.

Grow up!

Yes, targeted exclusively!

Unless you're Black, you have no argument.

But for the record, a wild Black will attack a White on average much sooner, than he will attack another Black, just based on programmed racial hatred, and or gang affiliation qualifications. This isn't a stat based on any study, it's knowing from the inside.

Please read:

Most Whites aren't the one's running around harassing Blacks. If/when a Black attacks a White, you hardly hear anything about it, and if you do, you will only be amazed at how the double standard will show it's ugly head, for the crime shall not be classified a "hate crime." But if it's the other way around, believe me, all hell breaks loose in the Urban Black community. Case in point, the Halloween attacks in Long Beach California, three little White girls were savagely beaten by a pack of thugs. Tell me, what kind of punishment was handed out to the perps? Why weren't the Civil Rights Activists crying out for justice? Why wasn't it ever considered a hate crime? And why were the thugs given only a slap on the wrist, even after continued defiance, lack of remorse, and having made a mockery of the justice system, by harrassing witnesses who were expected to testify. If that same thing were to happen to Blacks at the hands of Whites, there would be rioting in the streets. You're not Black, I am! I know all too well what many Blacks have to say, I hear it all the time. The strange, and mostly illogical reasoning these undesirables use is "well they were White, they deserved it," and you're defending this? If you are White, I'll guarantee, they'de do harm to you too, they'de judge you by the color of your skin, but not by the content of your character, and think nothing of it. The Dream, is a nightmare my friend, so Wake up! Not all, but many Blacks in general know they have a "race card" sitting in the deck, once again, not all, but many proudly admit to having some form of hatred towards Whites for no logical reason whatsoever. This attitude didn't just come out of thin air, it was put there by the P.C. guilt ridden Leftists. Many Blacks feel they are somehow owed something. You speak of how these low lifes attack other Blacks, as if that somehow is supposed to excuse their bad behavior. Do not patronize me. I do not care to challenge you on the economic performance of Whites, that is none of my concern, but for the untold many that would have otherwise been successful, had it not been due to the fact, they had the unfortunate circumstance of running into an ignorant pack of criminals, they would have otherwise been just fine in life, so that does mean the deck is stacked against Whites, especially when the perp is often able to get off on a light prison sentence, and be let free to go out, and practice all he has learned from behind bars. We all know Blacks have been afforded preferential treatment, this almost "protected Species" status which further stacks the deck against Whites. Your views in the hands of the powerful are what's got us upstanding Blacks caught in the mix with all the rest. We don't need your voice, or your sympathy. If you need to hear me say it again, I'm Black, I know what ignorant negroes have to say, I hear it with my own two ears, and do know all too well the race cards they are ready to pull, not you! There is no contradiction here, So yes, I stand behind everything I said, and you don't need to hear another one of the members of this forum tell you the truth about Blacks, because I'm all the Black you'll ever need to hear it from. :mad:

Ze'ev
February 17th, 2008, 09:09 PM
Yes, targeted exclusively!

Unless you're Black, you have no argument.

But for the record, a wild Black will attack a White on average much sooner, than he will attack another Black, just based on programmed racial hatred, and or gang affiliation qualifications. This isn't a stat based on any study, it's knowing from the inside.

Please read:

Most Whites aren't the one's running around harassing Blacks. If/when a Black attacks a White, you hardly hear anything about it, and if you do, you will only be amazed at how the double standard will show it's ugly head, for the crime shall not be classified a "hate crime." But if it's the other way around, believe me, all hell breaks loose in the Urban Black community. Case in point, the Halloween attacks in Long Beach California, three little White girls were savagely beaten by a pack of thugs. Tell me, what kind of punishment was handed out to the perps? Why weren't the Civil Rights Activists crying out for justice? Why wasn't it ever considered a hate crime? And why were the thugs given only a slap on the wrist, even after continued defiance, lack of remorse, and having made a mockery of the justice system, by harrassing witnesses who were expected to testify. If that same thing were to happen to Blacks at the hands of Whites, there would be rioting in the streets. You're not Black, I am! I know all too well what many Blacks have to say, I hear it all the time. The strange, and mostly illogical reasoning these undesirables use is "well they were White, they deserved it," and you're defending this? If you are White, I'll guarantee, they'de do harm to you too, they'de judge you by the color of your skin, but not by the content of your character, and think nothing of it. The Dream, is a nightmare my friend, so Wake up! Not all, but many Blacks in general know they have a "race card" sitting in the deck, once again, not all, but many proudly admit to having some form of hatred towards Whites for no logical reason whatsoever. This attitude didn't just come out of thin air, it was put there by the P.C. guilt ridden Leftists. Many Blacks feel they are somehow owed something. You speak of how these low lifes attack other Blacks, as if that somehow is supposed to excuse their bad behavior. Do not patronize me. I do not care to challenge you on the economic performance of Whites, that is none of my concern, but for the untold many that would have otherwise been successful, had it not been due to the fact, they had the unfortunate circumstance of running into an ignorant pack of criminals, they would have otherwise been just fine in life, so that does mean the deck is stacked against Whites, especially when the perp is often able to get off on a light prison sentence, and be let free to go out, and practice all he has learned from behind bars. We all know Blacks have been afforded preferential treatment, this almost "protected Species" status which further stacks the deck against Whites. Your views in the hands of the powerful are what's got us upstanding Blacks caught in the mix with all the rest. We don't need your voice, or your sympathy. If you need to hear me say it again, I'm Black, I know what ignorant negroes have to say, I hear it with my own two ears, and do know all too well the race cards they are ready to pull, not you! There is no contradiction here, So yes, I stand behind everything I said, and you don't need to hear another one of the members of this forum tell you the truth about Blacks, because I'm all the Black you'll ever need to hear it from. :mad:

Are you a black panther? I'm just curious.
Your eloquence in most of your posts only further prove what I have been saying.
You cant judge an individual by his race or nation.
Sure there is a lot of crime in the ghetto.
As I mentioned once before tho, if you go to the near west side of cleveland where I live, most of the crack whores and what-not walking the streets are WHITE ANGLO SAXXON.

And sure there are the stereotypical Jew types like Alan Greenspan or Woody Allen.
There have also been plenty of Jewish heroes however; warriors, scientists, artists, musicians, etc.
This debate could go on for ever, and don't think that I am knocking you...if you have seen any of my more serious posts you will see that I have issues about my peoples as well.
Don't hate on your self tho (you don't seem to, just saying) and hopefully you realize that not all of your brothers and sisters fit into these stereotypes...as you clearly do not!

I will say this tho, it is nice to see some blacks that are actually against affirmative action!

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 09:36 PM
Most Whites aren't the one's running around harassing Blacks.

Excuse me? Um, here in Indianapolis, we had four drunk white cops march right down Meridian St (yep, located right where you'd guess) yelling racial slurs, beat up a black guy, and then a white guy that tried to help him.

TWO of them got a paid vacation, and they're ALL still on the force.

I see white people get pulled over, and it's "license and registration, please" but if it's young black guys, it's "Step out of the car and put your hands on the hood."

You don't need to be black to see the disparity in the justice system.

Just look at how cocaine (a mainly white drug) has been getting shorter jail sentences for 20+ years vs crack cocaine, the SAME EXACT drug, but in a form more commonly used by blacks. That says it all right there.

Same drug, longer sentences. Why?

jimbo!
February 17th, 2008, 10:11 PM
Excuse me? Um, here in Indianapolis, we had four drunk white cops march right down Meridian St (yep, located right where you'd guess) yelling racial slurs, beat up a black guy, and then a white guy that tried to help him.

TWO of them got a paid vacation, and they're ALL still on the force.

I see white people get pulled over, and it's "license and registration, please" but if it's young black guys, it's "Step out of the car and put your hands on the hood."

You don't need to be black to see the disparity in the justice system.

Just look at how cocaine (a mainly white drug) has been getting shorter jail sentences for 20+ years vs crack cocaine, the SAME EXACT drug, but in a form more commonly used by blacks. That says it all right there.

Same drug, longer sentences. Why?

u must be some kind of fckn nigga to even ask a question like that!
the reason white Kwaps (who, by & large, are fckn race traitors any-ways!) take precautions with niggaz is because they're mostly psychopathic, violent thugs.....don't believe that? then acquire a book called "Race, Evolution & Behaviour" by French-Canuck J P Rushton! T.N.B........racial differences are real & scientifically provable...HTF do u fit that into yr "Scriptures"? hunh? jew-boy?

we hate kikes not because of what they are or what they believe but because of what they do!T.J.B. ......the jews are responsible for the obliteration of over 600million white people (men, women & children) during the last 100 yrs!......do some fckn back-ground reading (http://www.jewwatch.com) before displaying yr woeful ignorance!

almost every western government is a ZOG......and legislation is passed on an almost daily basis to further afflict & oppress white people...we are, there-fore, @ WAR with yr whole fckn tribe, cunt!

as for Jesus being a kike......that doesn't even "add up" if u believe the New Testament......"the immaculate conception" means that He could not possibly have had the slightest jewish biological heritage...whether or not Mary was a jew is debatable too!

ancient documents like the Acti Pilati (the Acts of Pilate) clearly portray Jesus as having distinctive Aryan physiogonomy....as He has always been depicted by artists & sculptors for the last two millenia!

the Bible is of doubtful antecedents any-way but is most likely not jewish....or has little jewish input.....its most probable origins are the mid-to-Far East.....India or Persia....Zoroastianism may be the real origin of xtianity;

WTF-ever: the jews don't follow the Bible, any-ways....they follow the Talmud, a vile conconction of racist/religious hate that makes Mein Kampf look like a Donald Duck comic!

the early xtians were "clued up" to the jews and, until as recently as the late eighteenth century, kept them "quarantined" from white, gentile society.....knowing full well the jew hatred of white xtianity and that almost all the early persecutions of the Church were wholly & solely their responsibility!

all yr other twaddle posted here abt being some kind of "messianic mamzer" is just that.....twaddle!.....only if yr spewed outta a kike cunt are you "eligible" to be a jew...and, even if u were a jew, proclaiming yr-self any sort of xtian would mean automatic ostracism in Yidsrael if not out-right deportation.....SNAP OUT of IT!, u fckn prick!.....no white man in his right mind would align him-self with this sinister inter-national criminal cabal of psychopathic Talmudic gangsters & mass-murderers!.....and no God ever described by any moral, philosophical or religious belief-system could entertain such satanic goblins for a micro-second! :mad:

(jimbo!)

http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q197/__jimbo__/regalia_mothercross_gold.jpg

Ed Keiser
February 17th, 2008, 10:22 PM
Excuse me? Um, here in Indianapolis, we had four drunk white cops march right down Meridian St (yep, located right where you'd guess) yelling racial slurs, beat up a black guy, and then a white guy that tried to help him.

TWO of them got a paid vacation, and they're ALL still on the force.

I see white people get pulled over, and it's "license and registration, please" but if it's young black guys, it's "Step out of the car and put your hands on the hood."

You don't need to be black to see the disparity in the justice system.

Just look at how cocaine (a mainly white drug) has been getting shorter jail sentences for 20+ years vs crack cocaine, the SAME EXACT drug, but in a form more commonly used by blacks. That says it all right there.

Same drug, longer sentences. Why?Statistics prove blacks to be violent degenerates with no respect for authority so why would a police officer treat your "peeps" any other way? I read a poll conducted by some liberal media nutjob [east coast jew] on this very topic. When asked by the reporter almost all of the policemen polled stated that the most dangerous part of their job was the interaction with young minority males aged 14 to 30. It's funny how your race embraces the "gansta lifestyle" then when you are treated like the "thugs" you portray yourselves to be you cry like little bitches. It's very tiresome hearing about how you've been mistreated and profiled and how your civil rights were violated. It's time for your subhuman race to take responsibility for your actions. If you comported yourselves like
decent law abiding citizens and not like the animalistic jungle bunnies you are you could stop crying about how the Criminal Justice System treats you unfairly.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 10:38 PM
u must be some kind of fckn nigga to even ask a question like that!

First things, first.

Dude, if you haven't yet mastered the intricacies of the English language, may I suggest you IMMEDIATELY acquire Mozilla Firefox, which has a built-in spell check, so that others can figure out what the hell you're trying to say? Here, I'll make it nice and easy for you, in case the internet confuses you as much as English-

http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/

Now, then, of COURSE a racist would assume that I must be black, or I wouldn't care about injustice against blacks. But, again, I'll refer you back to the Torah, which is my guideline for living-

Justice, ONLY justice, you shall pursue -Deu 16:20

You are to apply the same standard of judgment to the foreigner as to the citizen -Lev 24:22

The same teaching is to apply equally to the citizen and to the foreigner living among you. -Exo 12:49

So you see that as one who follows Jewish law, it matters not what race a person is. I am still commanded to treat them as anyone else. In fact, Judaism provides the EARLIEST recorded example of racial equality, just as it provides the earliest recorded example of literacy being required for all citizens, man, woman, and child.

You're really going to need to communicate more effectively if you want any further response. I don't speak netspeak. That crap may fly on your ghetto technology, text messaging and such, but I speak real English and I respond to real English. If you can master that, we can carry on a conversation. Until then, I'll bid you goodnight.

Matityahu
February 17th, 2008, 10:41 PM
Statistics prove blacks to be violent degenerates with no respect for authority so why would a police officer treat your "peeps" any other way? I read a poll conducted by some liberal media nutjob [east coast jew] on this very topic. When asked by the reporter almost all of the policemen polled stated that the most dangerous part of their job was the interaction with young minority males aged 14 to 30. It's funny how your race embraces the "gansta lifestyle" then when you are treated like the "thugs" you portray yourselves to be you cry like little bitches. It's very tiresome hearing about how you've been mistreated and profiled and how your civil rights were violated. It's time for your subhuman race to take responsibility for your actions. If you comported yourselves like
decent law abiding citizens and not like the animalistic jungle bunnies you are you could stop crying about how the Criminal Justice System treats you unfairly.

So I claim racial bias on the part of some police officers, and to disprove that, you show me... No, wait, you didn't SHOW me anything, but you speak OF a study wherein police officers speak openly of their racial bias? WELL.. you sure showed ME, didn'tcha?

I have yet to hear an answer to a very simple question. If the legal system is not slated against blacks, why is the SAME DRUG treated differently, and punished more harshly, if found in a form more commonly used by blacks? I'm talking about crack vs cocaine, which are the same damn thing, in a different form. Hashish is not punished more severely than marijuana, so why are the mandatory minimums for crack more severe than those for cocaine HCL?

Hell Raising Woman
February 17th, 2008, 11:32 PM
So please tell us what you have created, that your great white nation may take pride in...:rofl

Please, do not confuse western innovation and creativity with your middle-aged 'thinking.' Thank you.

Prussian Blue infected kike: We have invented the crematory for jews.

A. Black
February 17th, 2008, 11:34 PM
Excuse me? Um, here in Indianapolis, we had four drunk white cops march right down Meridian St (yep, located right where you'd guess) yelling racial slurs, beat up a black guy, and then a white guy that tried to help him.

TWO of them got a paid vacation, and they're ALL still on the force.

I see white people get pulled over, and it's "license and registration, please" but if it's young black guys, it's "Step out of the car and put your hands on the hood."

You don't need to be black to see the disparity in the justice system.

Just look at how cocaine (a mainly white drug) has been getting shorter jail sentences for 20+ years vs crack cocaine, the SAME EXACT drug, but in a form more commonly used by blacks. That says it all right there.

Same drug, longer sentences. Why?

White Nationals,

hope everyone has their popcorn... T.N.B.

Round Two:

It should be noted, I do understand there are racial injustices Blacks must continue to put up with, however much of it is self inflicted. Why self inflicted, you might ask? Well the answer is rooted in the Civil Rights Movements of the Sixties. This is a crucial point in American history, for it was the dawn of a new era. Now of course, being Black myself, it would be quite difficult for me to say the spirit of the movement was not without well intentions, however the movement was ultimately plagued with mindless, heartless, and selfish men who would use this time, and this opportunity to advance their own personal agenda. Enlightened Blacks are just coming around to realizing, the leaders that so many have historically looked up to, basically have been of absolutely no benefit to anyone other than themselves. Al, and Jessie have reaped most of the financial benefits of this movement by way of establishing political affiliations, and the use of racial guilt. These "so-called" Black leaders found the goose that laid the golden eggs, so to speak. But the problem was, in order for these men to continue to keep the golden eggs coming, they needed to rely on simple minded, and desperate Blacks to believe they were victims. A generation later, and this is what we have, a nation full of enlightened Whites, who have every reason to resent the Black man. Some may be more vocal, than others, but I wouldn't believe any would not have a right to be extremely upset with how things have turned out here in present day America. You mention the story about the Officers who went to the Black neighborhood, and started raising hell, and I'm sure it'll happen time, and time again, until we get out, but what you must understand is this, Blacks for the most part have not done much to earn our own respect here in America. We are where we are in society, primarily because of preferential treatment. Now I'm not going to say that all police brutality is our own fault, but if you think about it, the majority of it is, even if an innocent Black is attacked. Looking at it from my perspective, you must take into consideration, had every Black since the C.R.M. made it their number one priority to assimilate in to mainstream America, and became loyal, hard working, upstanding citizens, you would also have to say more Blacks would become successful, and begin to wield more political infleuence, and social status. Common sense dictates, no one wants to bother a powerful person, regardless of their race. If Blacks had earned a reputation of having more influential representatives within our race, versus the reputation we have now, do you actually think the average patrolman would risk losing all he worked for, just to bother a Black? Hardly! Blacks reputation suck, and we just keep adding to the declining integrity? of it with just about everything we do. I'm not self hating, I only call em the way I see em. Jews are hated too, but you don't see them getting pulled over. Same for the Asian. So what if crack comes with a stiffer penalty than does powder, we shouldn't be doing any of it in the first place. So there's no excuse. Blacks caused the disparity to continue. I've noticed you do seem to be inclined to use quite a few comparisons, that's the Black's problem, so many of us are too busy looking at what someone else is doing, and paying attention to what the next guy, or gal is doing, instead of trying to attain their own. Answer me this, how will Blacks be able to continue to play race cards, after realizing America may end up with a Negro President? Which is a direct result of Whites, because Blacks simply do not have enough electoral numbers to make such a thing happen. If we knew better, we'de vote for Ron Paul, but that's just me. :rolleyes:

Hell Raising Woman
February 17th, 2008, 11:42 PM
You can take the Pepsi challenge, too.

Are YOU willing to match source for source? Cause I KNOW I'm not going to have to rely on those that share my ideology to prove MY case. The classifications of musical instruments we continue to teach children today were all FIRST recorded in Jewish history. This is not a guess, I'm prepared to prove it, if I'm not spending 1/2 hour just to shoot fish in a barrel, anyway.

Dietrech- Is it your position, then, that the panel of judges came from Rome or elsewhere, or are you prepared to admit that this form of government was EARLIEST recorded in the annals of Jewish history?

I'm curious- what is "high art"? The term itself seems to a futile attempt to apply science to art, to refer to more and less evolved forms of art, when art itself is, of course, completely subjective.

Yes, I'm well aware of Pythagorus' contributions, but being Meditteranean, were you to see him in your white supremacist utopia, you would likely have killed him before he'd had the chance.

Typical of kikes like you to control every aspect of our culture by debunking the White accomplishments in history. You worthless kikes should have been exterminated 500 years ago.

Ed Keiser
February 18th, 2008, 12:05 AM
So I claim racial bias on the part of some police officers, and to disprove that, you show me... No, wait, you didn't SHOW me anything, but you speak OF a study wherein police officers speak openly of their racial bias? WELL.. you sure showed ME, didn'tcha?

I have yet to hear an answer to a very simple question. If the legal system is not slated against blacks, why is the SAME DRUG treated differently, and punished more harshly, if found in a form more commonly used by blacks? I'm talking about crack vs cocaine, which are the same damn thing, in a different form. Hashish is not punished more severely than marijuana, so why are the mandatory minimums for crack more severe than those for cocaine HCL?The law of which you speak is currently being repealed and those convicted under it will be realeased after meeting what ever standard the powers that be decide upon. The study I spoke of was done a few years ago and encompassed police officers of ALL RACES. This means black police officers see thier own race as violent miscreants as well. I tried to pull it up so I could post it but I am having trouble finding it.

Ed Keiser
February 18th, 2008, 12:17 AM
I found the poll at www.thugreport.com but it's no longer available, sorry. Check this site out anyway it's quite good.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 12:23 AM
White Nationals,

hope everyone has their popcorn... T.N.B.

Round Two:

It should be noted, I do understand there are racial injustices Blacks must continue to put up with, however much of it is self inflicted.

I can agree, to a point. Certainly among Black America there is a sort of philosophy of victimology. This shows itself even outside of the spectrum of politics and civil rights.. For example, in the opposite roles whites and blacks tend to give their children. Whites tend to be overprotective of their daughters, and give their sons more room to roam, while Blacks baby their sons, and leave their daughters to fend for themselves earlier. This I would tie to the VERY REAL fact that 1/3 of young black males are in some form of corrections, be it probation, prison, or parole. And of course, as your later points touch on, we could play the chicken and egg game all night.. Do cops treat blacks like criminals because they act like it, or are blacks disrespectful and distrustful of police, because they've seen for themselves that they aren't going to get a fair shake?

Ultimately, any chicken and egg argument can't really bear any fruit, or be satisfactorily answered. Which is exactly WHY I chose initially to address it in terms that have nothing to do with pre-existing prejudices or personal attitudes. It's just one little fact, but it speaks volumes. Are whites really getting busted for their coke less often than blacks are for their crack? Or is it simply that whites are getting out quicker, and so the statistics are skewed?

No, of course, no one should be doing it. But that doesn't excuse whatever the system wants to do because they've broken a law. Let's not forget we ARE talking about a drug that has ZERO physical dependency. It's no different than pointing out that we have in this country at least 13 people serving life sentences for a plant (not a drug) which has NEVER killed ANYONE in the history of the world (marijuana). Sure, you can say it's illegal, so people should leave it alone, and in truth, that was MY reasoning, too, but that doesn't stop me from questioning whether the current system is really the best way, instead of letting the punishment fit the crime (and its actual effects on society).

the Civil Rights Movements of the Sixties... was ultimately plagued with mindless, heartless, and selfish men

Here's the point at which you lost me. I thought it followed quite a logical progression. The Rev Dr King, despite the personal demons he had, was quite an effective leader, with a style very befitting his Christian background. He did not physically resist the status quo, but rather encouraged non-violent protest, which is really what set the movement off. Selfishness would have demanded those protesters keep marching or defend themselves when told to turn back. But instead, he said "We have come too far to turn back now" and kneeled down and began to pray. No other response could have had the same effect. But when all of America saw a submissive crowd, on their knees, being beaten by the police, the reality of the situation became crystal clear to them. And a movement was born.

Even if we want to look more recently... I can't say I agree with the likes of Malcolm X, Elijah Muhammed, etc.. but at the same time, I can completely understand how they came to the point they did.

Malcolm Little had spoken with the Rev King, and while they didn't see eye to eye, there was a mutual respect. Malcolm was quite content, for a time, to let King's route run its course. It was only when peaceful activism failed, when the Rev was killed, that "By any means necessary" began to catch on as the next alternative. I would NOT say Black America was EAGER for a race war, but rather that the evil spawns of hasatan that murdered Rev King FORCED it on them. Words had not worked. Peace had not worked. A new day had dawned.

And again, the government was just as cowardly in dealing with this new movement as it had been in dealing with the last. Cointelpro tactics were used against anyone considered the "New Left." Infiltration, subversion, encouraging peaceful groups to consider unlawful and even violent acts became the norm, to the point that the running joke became "There's a plant in every group, and it's the one most loudly encouraging you to break the law."

Is it REALLY any wonder that poor America in GENERAL, white AND black, distrusts the police and the government?

They say they're fighting gangs, but they CREATED the largest gangs, when they forced the Panthers underground. Just like they say they're fighting drugs, even though we've CAUGHT the CIA funnelling coke into the country, and caught them funnelling weapons to the middle east paid for with drug money.

Al, and Jessie

They ARE false leaders, yes. Nobody appointed them, nobody elected them, and in fact these self appointed leaders are as likely to be found promoting racial superiority themselves, i.e. hate crimes as they are to be found fighting legitimate injustices like the Jena 6 situation. I don't personally associate them with the civil rights movement, though, not in any sort of leadership role. What am I missing there?


A generation later, and this is what we have, a nation full of enlightened Whites, who have every reason to resent the Black man.

Whaaaat? That's not what *I* see. The state-mandated curricula are dumbing down ALL American children whose parents can't afford a real education. Our children believe that Christopher Columbus discovered America. They believe that Lincoln freed all the slaves in America.


Now I'm not going to say that all police brutality is our own fault, but if you think about it, the majority of it is, even if an innocent Black is attacked. Looking at it from my perspective, you must take into consideration, had every Black since the C.R.M. made it their number one priority to assimilate in to mainstream America, and became loyal, hard working, upstanding citizens, you would also have to say more Blacks would become successful, and begin to wield more political infleuence, and social status. Common sense dictates, no one wants to bother a powerful person, regardless of their race.

Again, you've lost me, and seem to be making stereotypical generalizations about blacks, which seems rather odd, given the source. I don't know your background, but I grew up working class, lower middle class you might say, but NOT in a welfare neighborhood. I saw whites and blacks alike trying to pull themselves out of the situations into which they were born, and of course, I also saw whites and blacks alike give up on that dream, accept the fate the overseers wanted for them all along, and fall through the cracks.

Answer me this, how will Blacks be able to continue to play race cards, after realizing America may end up with a Negro President? Which is a direct result of Whites, because Blacks simply do not have enough electoral numbers to make such a thing happen. If we knew better, we'de vote for Ron Paul, but that's just me. :rolleyes:

Oh good L-rd. And if he wins, it will only BE because he'd be the first black President. It is terrible that that wins anybody a vote, but the entire democratic vote will go that way, regardless of how it falls. "First woman president" or "first black president" they're still voting based on how the person LOOKS instead of anything coming out of their mouths... hence why Obama can get all this press with empty talk about change, even though they never really get into what KIND of changes he wants to make.

Bush shredding the Constitution was a change. That didn't make it a GOOD change.

Yeah, I'd be voting Paul, too, if I had the option. The Libertarian party has extended him an offer, but apparently he's said he won't run on anything but the RP ticket. A darn shame, because I will only vote FOR a candidate, not against one. If no one on the ballot excites me, I'll just stay home. It's just like Jello Biafra said, If the will of the majority REALLY mattered, No one would be President, No one would be in the Senate, or the House, because the majority don't vote. I won't pretend my vote matters, if the choice is tweedledum or tweedledumber.

A. Black
February 18th, 2008, 02:36 AM
I can agree, to a point. Certainly among Black America there is a sort of philosophy of victimology. This shows itself even outside of the spectrum of politics and civil rights.. For example, in the opposite roles whites and blacks tend to give their children. Whites tend to be overprotective of their daughters, and give their sons more room to roam, while Blacks baby their sons, and leave their daughters to fend for themselves earlier. This I would tie to the VERY REAL fact that 1/3 of young black males are in some form of corrections, be it probation, prison, or parole. And of course, as your later points touch on, we could play the chicken and egg game all night.. Do cops treat blacks like criminals because they act like it, or are blacks disrespectful and distrustful of police, because they've seen for themselves that they aren't going to get a fair shake?

Ultimately, any chicken and egg argument can't really bear any fruit, or be satisfactorily answered. Which is exactly WHY I chose initially to address it in terms that have nothing to do with pre-existing prejudices or personal attitudes. It's just one little fact, but it speaks volumes. Are whites really getting busted for their coke less often than blacks are for their crack? Or is it simply that whites are getting out quicker, and so the statistics are skewed?

No, of course, no one should be doing it. But that doesn't excuse whatever the system wants to do because they've broken a law. Let's not forget we ARE talking about a drug that has ZERO physical dependency. It's no different than pointing out that we have in this country at least 13 people serving life sentences for a plant (not a drug) which has NEVER killed ANYONE in the history of the world (marijuana). Sure, you can say it's illegal, so people should leave it alone, and in truth, that was MY reasoning, too, but that doesn't stop me from questioning whether the current system is really the best way, instead of letting the punishment fit the crime (and its actual effects on society).



Here's the point at which you lost me. I thought it followed quite a logical progression. The Rev Dr King, despite the personal demons he had, was quite an effective leader, with a style very befitting his Christian background. He did not physically resist the status quo, but rather encouraged non-violent protest, which is really what set the movement off. Selfishness would have demanded those protesters keep marching or defend themselves when told to turn back. But instead, he said "We have come too far to turn back now" and kneeled down and began to pray. No other response could have had the same effect. But when all of America saw a submissive crowd, on their knees, being beaten by the police, the reality of the situation became crystal clear to them. And a movement was born.

Even if we want to look more recently... I can't say I agree with the likes of Malcolm X, Elijah Muhammed, etc.. but at the same time, I can completely understand how they came to the point they did.

Malcolm Little had spoken with the Rev King, and while they didn't see eye to eye, there was a mutual respect. Malcolm was quite content, for a time, to let King's route run its course. It was only when peaceful activism failed, when the Rev was killed, that "By any means necessary" began to catch on as the next alternative. I would NOT say Black America was EAGER for a race war, but rather that the evil spawns of hasatan that murdered Rev King FORCED it on them. Words had not worked. Peace had not worked. A new day had dawned.

And again, the government was just as cowardly in dealing with this new movement as it had been in dealing with the last. Cointelpro tactics were used against anyone considered the "New Left." Infiltration, subversion, encouraging peaceful groups to consider unlawful and even violent acts became the norm, to the point that the running joke became "There's a plant in every group, and it's the one most loudly encouraging you to break the law."

Is it REALLY any wonder that poor America in GENERAL, white AND black, distrusts the police and the government?

They say they're fighting gangs, but they CREATED the largest gangs, when they forced the Panthers underground. Just like they say they're fighting drugs, even though we've CAUGHT the CIA funnelling coke into the country, and caught them funnelling weapons to the middle east paid for with drug money.



They ARE false leaders, yes. Nobody appointed them, nobody elected them, and in fact these self appointed leaders are as likely to be found promoting racial superiority themselves, i.e. hate crimes as they are to be found fighting legitimate injustices like the Jena 6 situation. I don't personally associate them with the civil rights movement, though, not in any sort of leadership role. What am I missing there?




Whaaaat? That's not what *I* see. The state-mandated curricula are dumbing down ALL American children whose parents can't afford a real education. Our children believe that Christopher Columbus discovered America. They believe that Lincoln freed all the slaves in America.




Again, you've lost me, and seem to be making stereotypical generalizations about blacks, which seems rather odd, given the source. I don't know your background, but I grew up working class, lower middle class you might say, but NOT in a welfare neighborhood. I saw whites and blacks alike trying to pull themselves out of the situations into which they were born, and of course, I also saw whites and blacks alike give up on that dream, accept the fate the overseers wanted for them all along, and fall through the cracks.



Oh good L-rd. And if he wins, it will only BE because he'd be the first black President. It is terrible that that wins anybody a vote, but the entire democratic vote will go that way, regardless of how it falls. "First woman president" or "first black president" they're still voting based on how the person LOOKS instead of anything coming out of their mouths... hence why Obama can get all this press with empty talk about change, even though they never really get into what KIND of changes he wants to make.

Bush shredding the Constitution was a change. That didn't make it a GOOD change.

Yeah, I'd be voting Paul, too, if I had the option. The Libertarian party has extended him an offer, but apparently he's said he won't run on anything but the RP ticket. A darn shame, because I will only vote FOR a candidate, not against one. If no one on the ballot excites me, I'll just stay home. It's just like Jello Biafra said, If the will of the majority REALLY mattered, No one would be President, No one would be in the Senate, or the House, because the majority don't vote. I won't pretend my vote matters, if the choice is tweedledum or tweedledumber.

Sorry, but I am rather hardlined in my stance on many issues with regards to blacks, you may not understand how I am able to take such positions, but you're also not a part of the race with the biggest number of misfits either.

Good Evening!

Starr
February 18th, 2008, 03:07 AM
Few nations have been built more than America, by who? THE PEOPLE.

Your error is you think based on your emotions. T.N.B.

This nation that you are praising would not even exist without many of the things you decried in your original post, as I am sure you know. your lefty multiculti buddies would smack you around a bit for not recognising this.

zyklonB
February 18th, 2008, 04:46 AM
One problem with your simplistic equation, New York today looks like the first picture - after Jewliani cleaned it up.

Yes, he did do a pretty decent job cleaning up nyc. The only problem he turned it into a big brother police state. There are cameras everywhere to watch for any nig nog who steps out of line. These cameras are mostly located in white areas to protect us from wandering savages. Cops have the "right" to frisk you for merely carrying a bag. They stand in the subway entrances and search random people as they enter.

But all isn't fair in NYC. I worked in the Bronx for about a year or so. Pitbull shit littered the sidewalks from where I worked to the metro north station. More than once I saw them "training" them and even got attacked by one. I would be contantly harrassed by the natives as I walked to and from the train station. Everyday I would overhear cops raiding apartments from street.

Yes, crime has significantly dropped. But consider the mass exodus of whites from NYC in the past 10-20 years has vastly reduced the amount of targets these racist niggers have. It is true the mostly white areas, like Manhatten are nice, but the nigger areas are still shit. The only reason those areas are even cleaned up at all was due to changes in things like spray paint resistant subway cars. They also give niggers placebo jobs like handing out metros and am's every morning. Those papers are garbage and the only reason they exist is to give niggers jobs so they won't rob and rape all the jews that live here.

Another reason NYC isn't another "Paris of America" like Detroit is because NYC is the financial capitol of the world. When you have access to the resources that control the money flow of the world you can find people to make sure those niggers are under control.

Prince_Vivid
February 18th, 2008, 06:16 AM
Well the answer is rooted in the Civil Rights Movements of the Sixties.

It is. The level of criminal activity, wedlock births, and the general non-productivity should be revealing enough.

I'm sure that most of the white people of that time who were not maliciously racist would have had better things to say in regards to the American negro than present whites in regards to today's blacks. Take Henry Ford for example, a racist/anti-semite, like most men of his time, hired more blacks than any other company would and allowed them to work in any department. Why? Because of loyalty to the company, honesty, and hard work--something you just don't see very much these days.

This is a crucial point in American history, for it was the dawn of a new era. Now of course, being Black myself, it would be quite difficult for me to say the spirit of the movement was not without well intentions, however the movement was ultimately plagued with mindless, heartless, and selfish men who would use this time, and this opportunity to advance their own personal agenda.

A jewish agenda. The jews had told their story to Europe for centuries, and having made every nation feel sorry for ever opening its doors to them, they had to put a new face on their story and channel it through a new voice.

That's where black people came in. Sure, they opened the doors for us but only so that they could sneak in behind us.

Democracy is merely a tool of a word which Jewish agitators use to raise themselves to the ordinary level in places where they are oppressed below it; but having reached the common level they immediately make efforts for special privileges, as being entitled to them - a process which the late Peace Conference (Versailles: Ed.) will remain the most startling example. -Ford

Enlightened Blacks are just coming around to realizing, the leaders that so many have historically looked up to, basically have been of absolutely no benefit to anyone other than themselves. Al, and Jessie have reaped most of the financial benefits of this movement by way of establishing political affiliations, and the use of racial guilt.

LOL. I can't stand those bastards. Have you ever seen The Boondocks? Its humor really lies in pointing out the dumb things that a lot of black people do. There's an episode called 'The S-Word'(Spearchucker)where a kid is called a 'nigga', and this Al Sharpton type character named Rollo Goodlove pops up out of nowhere and exploits it. They never really use real names for obvious legal reasons but the implications are hilarious.

Common sense dictates, no one wants to bother a powerful person, regardless of their race. If Blacks had earned a reputation of having more influential representatives within our race, versus the reputation we have now, do you actually think the average patrolman would risk losing all he worked for, just to bother a Black? Hardly!

That's going a little far.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 06:57 AM
Sorry, but I am rather hardlined in my stance on many issues with regards to blacks, you may not understand how I am able to take such positions, but you're also not a part of the race with the biggest number of misfits either.

Good Evening!

Et tu?

You feel the need to make assumptions about race, too? I've never said that I was or wasn't. But if you stereotype like them, I suppose, why shouldnt you assume like they do?

Karen Z.
February 18th, 2008, 07:07 AM
I have yet to hear an answer to a very simple question. If the legal system is not slated against blacks, why is the SAME DRUG treated differently, and punished more harshly, if found in a form more commonly used by blacks? I'm talking about crack vs cocaine, which are the same damn thing, in a different form. Hashish is not punished more severely than marijuana, so why are the mandatory minimums for crack more severe than those for cocaine HCL?


I know something about this yahu.

A good friend of mine lives in a neighborhood in Dallas that just 15 years ago was nice(85 to 100,000dollar homes). But the wave of negroes spreading from south Dallas finally reached his neighborhood and right now, you have what still appears to be a nice, semi-upscale neighborhood, and lo! Right there on the corner are niggers selling crack.. just a few feet from my friends home.. he and his wife just had a new baby, but they know they cannot call the police, this is gang business and they'll be shot in their beds, and the cops will have done nothing about the crack dealers or their murderers.(Dallas cops are terrible)
There is a 'corner' in Grand Prairie thats been operating for as long as i've lived here(15 years). Those nigs selling crack won't think anything of killing you, robbing your home etc.

These days, you can hardly get powdered coke- but when you do, you drive to some white dudes house which could be in any neighborhood and go in, and you leave, no violence, no standing in menacing groups on the corner.. mostly who gets hurt with that shit is the user and the cops who try fighting it. Or he sells it to you at work, or at the bar, NOT on a corner in plain view, at a playground.(there was one selling it in the playground across from my old complex, a mostly white area.)
Also crack is concentrated cocaine and more addictive, produces a more dangerous addict, has mostly dangerous blacks strung out on it-and number one, is in control of black gangs which are reputed to be worse than the 'white gangs':rolleyes:.(are there even any white gangs?)
Hey whitey, did you know that blackey thinks he can control you by getting you and your kids addicted to crack? He does, and he's trying.. I've heard them say it, right from the mules mouth! world conquest by crack!:rofl

Karen Z.
February 18th, 2008, 07:12 AM
But all isn't fair in NYC. I worked in the Bronx for about a year or so. Pitbull shit littered the sidewalks from where I worked to the metro north station. More than once I saw them "training" them and even got attacked by one. I would be contantly harrassed by the natives as I walked to and from the train station. Everyday I would overhear cops raiding apartments from street.


The pit bull is a white mans breed, created through several hundred years of intensive breeding and combat. It is supposed to be a small, quick dog, and the fight is supposed to be a very strictly ref'd afair with a stack of rules akin to boxing and no dogs dying in the ring.

Niggers breed big, man aggressive monsters and throw them into the ring to fight to the death.

DAMN the negro... DAMN HIM TO HELL.

tuisto
February 18th, 2008, 07:22 AM
Your error is in assuming that we live in a valid nation that represents our collective interests. We do not.

Nations are built on the interests of groups asserting themselves over the interests of others, plain and simple.

The first part "..assuming that we live..." seems to be true,
the second part "...groups asserting..." sounds like Marx's
communist manifest, only difference: he uses "...class struggle..." :rofl

Real "nations" are not built by greedy people suffering from gold rush syndroms, who, once rich, tell those without gold to submit.

Frank Toliver
February 18th, 2008, 08:45 AM
Just like Mr Toliver, stating his hatred for hippies, apparently not realizing that the existence of the internet owes to such visionary hippies as Stuart Brandt and Steve Wozniak.

False, dummy. The internet was a military creation, you are a fool.

http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/Topics/57.htm

And filthy Deadheads who think they know what is going on, and are willing to open their gaping face holes to tell you how they are fighting the man while stuffing their unwashed faces full of nachos, listening to shitty music, smoking pot and cheering on white girls who screw niggers are the average hippy, not a computer geek with a beard which is all Wozniak was. Stop getting all your info from wikipedia.

The home computer market would have been exploited one way or another, so don't give me an example of a capitalist as a hippie who changed my life. Other personal computers were in the market before the apple made its appearance, so check your facts.

http://www.blinkenlights.com/pc.shtml

The hippy revolution was another jew creation and that is why you love them with all your heart. Go to Darfur or the Congo or somewhere in Africa, they have much better life than we have without the racism of whitey there.

Every time you fuckers type your lying shit it makes me more motivated to make more money, do more for the cause, and hasten the day when we sterilize and/or eliminate every last jew on the planet, along with their helpers.

ben shockley
February 18th, 2008, 02:16 PM
Now what would be the point of that, psycho?

You've offered NOTHING in the way of evidence, but putting your words into QUOTES is supposed to make it more believable?

I, on the other hand, DO have evidence, but you've already stated you aren't willing to consider it. If you're not willing to let reality get in the way of your beliefs, then my point is proven without even opening google.

No, actually Yeshua ("Jesus" is little better than a slave name) was eating matzah (unleavened bread), and lamb, since the last supper was a Passover Seder.

Hatred is nothing new, Brutus, and it doesn't really bother me. It further proves the prophecies of the Bible, in all reality. Not only does it show the truth of G-d's children being persecuted, but in the various times that persecution has happened on a large scale, it also shows that though He will allow His children to suffer, He will never allow them to be destroyed. If it were not as I say, it would have happened long ago.

No matter how much a being may rebel against his creator, all things, good and evil, give glory to the One True G-d.. if not through their submission, then through their rebellion.

So continue slinging mud, if that's what it takes to make you feel like a big man. You can stick to your blond white women. They all look alike to me, anyway.

;)

What an ignorant joo lover.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 04:48 PM
False, dummy. The internet was a military creation, you are a fool.

You're so fucking clueless, it's almost unfathomable. You, what, googled it, and hit I Feel Lucky?

The military helped FUND it. Your article doesn't even MENTION the contributions made by Universities like MIT and Cambridge, which were... making it actually HAPPEN. They envisioned it, they put their students to work on it, with government funds, they supplied ARPAnet and DARPAnet, and then THEY went to work figuring out how to turn this CLOSED system into an OPEN system.

*edit*

AND lets not forget during this time, it was these same kids' weekend HOBBY that turned into the video game revolution.

Enter Stuart Brandt.

Laying the infrastructure for a network available to the masses would require a complex wiring scheme on a scale that could only be compared to the spread of the telephone. Yet how could such a thing be funded? Ah! But what if the whole thing could be made into a digital equivilent to his Whole Earth Catalog? Along with exchanging memos and collaborating on research projects, what if a system were set up by which consumers could easily be connected with retailers from around the country?

YES, it was when capitalism entered the vision that it became attainable.

As for Wozniak, okay so we know he was NOT a hippie because

1) His CURRENT frontpage is headed by the sentence "Welcome to a free exchange of information, the way it always should be."
2) During his days in the Homebrew Computer Club, he helped people build their own, and GAVE AWAY BLUEPRINTS, even as he was starting a company.
3) He PERSONALLY invested in the US festival in the early 80's.

Get some real PC history. Jobs was the marketing guy. The Woz was always the hacker, and rumor says he STILL loves going out to shows whenever he can, despite his aversion to his own popularity.


And filthy Deadheads who think they know what is going on, and are willing to open their gaping face holes to tell you how they are fighting the man while stuffing their unwashed faces full of nachos, listening to shitty music, smoking pot....

I'M NOT FAT DAMMIT I'M BIG BONED!http://www.xbox-skins.net/screenshots/%5B2955%5DCartmanHitler.JPG

What kills me about you people is that even though you talk like you're some kind of fucking revolutionaries, you ALSO hate those people who HAVE successfully been living off the grid for 40+ years?!

I call it jealousy. The Jews HAD their revolution, and they won. They have a homeland. The blacks HAD their revolution, and they won. They GOT their civil rights, AND rights to go to Liberia, for those that chose. What the fuck have YOU done? Sit and home, and bitch and moan to your little nazi buddies about how it's everyone else's fault you can't get ahead?

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 05:02 PM
Woohoo!

The edomite is starting to crack!!

Just a short while ago we had in our posession,the peaceful and tranquil edomite...


I subscribe to the Rev Dr King's philosophy, that we should be judged not by the color of our skin, but by the content of our character.

Since childhood, I have claimed no race for myself but that of "human." Why should it matter?



A few short and snappy posts later,we begin to see it's true nature....



What kills me about you people is that even though you talk like you're some kind of fucking revolutionaries, you ALSO hate those people who HAVE successfully been living off the grid for 40+ years?!

I call it jealousy. The Jews HAD their revolution, and they won. They have a homeland. The blacks HAD their revolution, and they won. They GOT their civil rights, AND rights to go to Liberia, for those that chose. What the fuck have YOU done? Sit and home, and bitch and moan to your little nazi buddies about how it's everyone else's fault you can't get ahead?

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 05:08 PM
(this, kiddies, is what we call a "strawman argument," If you can't defeat what your opponent actually IS saying, put words in his mouth, and then try to use THOSE against him instead.)

I claim no race. That does no bearing on the fact a PRIMARY factor in why your "movement" will never succeed, is that you shit on those who could be your allies. Hippies could teach you all how to live off the grid, how to be survivalists, how to be gray market capitolists, but quite frankly, I DOUBT any of you COULD do what they do.. It's not that it requires any great SKILL to set up shop outside a concert, and sell grilled cheese sandwiches, mushroom and spinach burritos, and other assorted foods, drinks, and goods... I've seen people with half a brain make a few hundred a night. But it DOES require that you have some self control, and treat people with dignity, and I just don't think any of you could do it.

If your kind had to disappear, you'd end up relying on others from your WN to take care of you, because you couldn't function well enough, or do business with a diverse enough group of people, to be self-sufficient in any underground economy (legal or otherwise).

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 05:17 PM
And Nazis could teach us to have a nation populated by our own volk,and to have healthy ,robust neighborhoods,with no need of stinky,unshaven commies or their goddamned illegal activities!
You are evidently a jew ,as shown be your defensiveness of those grubby hippie types,and their bottom feeding tactics.

PC}{Magician
February 18th, 2008, 05:26 PM
Also crack is concentrated cocaine

Now that's there is funny I don't care who ya are...

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Just add water and you have cocaine.....:)

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 05:37 PM
Also crack is concentrated cocaine and more addictive, produces a more dangerous addict

Yes, thank you PC I missed this.

No, it's not more concentrated. It's the same damn thing.

I can take some pot, and through any of several methods, turn it into hash, hash oil, honey oil, ANY form of extract, it doesn't matter for these purposes. I can then put that extract into a food or drink item, and consume. I will get (roughly) the SAME amount of cannabinoids, and I will get high. However, compared to SMOKING that pot, I will not be AS high, though the high will last longer through ingestion.

It's the exact same thing with Coke HCL and crack. Yes, you get higher smoking ANYthing(and thus, the high does not last as long), but that doesn't mean it's more "concentrated."

And either way, the addiction is all is the user's head.

Opium is addictive. Heroin is addictive. Alcohol is addictive. Nicotine is addictive. Caffeine is addictive.

If you take any of these substances daily for extended periods, you will have physical withdrawal symptoms if you then try to quit them cold turkey. There is no physical withdrawal with cocaine, either in HCL (powder) or crack form. It is 100% psychological.

Karen Z.
February 18th, 2008, 05:43 PM
Yes, thank you PC I missed this.

No, it's not more concentrated. It's the same damn thing.

I can take some pot, and through any of several methods, turn it into hash, hash oil, honey oil, ANY form of extract, it doesn't matter for these purposes. I can then put that extract into a food or drink item, and consume. I will get (roughly) the SAME amount of cannabinoids, and I will get high. However, compared to SMOKING that pot, I will not be AS high, though the high will last longer through ingestion.

It's the exact same thing with Coke HCL and crack. Yes, you get higher smoking ANYthing(and thus, the high does not last as long), but that doesn't mean it's more "concentrated."

And either way, the addiction is all is the user's head.

Opium is addictive. Heroin is addictive. Alcohol is addictive. Nicotine is addiction. Caffeine is addictive.

If you take any of these substances daily for extended periods, you will have physical withdrawal symptoms if you then try to quit them cold turkey. There is no physical withdrawal with cocaine, either in HCL (powder) or crack form. It is 100% psychological.


Dude, I've done both, I've been there... and I KNOW crack's a more powerful drug.. they add baking soda(which activates it)cook it, pour off the crap and rock it up into something stronger...cooking cocaine makes it stronger, yes it does, ask ANY addict.
No physical withdrawal my ass go fuck yourself jew.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 05:50 PM
http://www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/drugs/crack.asp


"Crack" is the name given to cocaine that has been processed with baking soda or ammonia, and transformed into a more potent,smokable, "rock" form.

Cocaine is a stimulant that has been abused for ages; however,crack cocaine is the most potent form in which the drug has ever appeared

http://www.drugfreeworld.org/factsaboutdrugs/crack.html


Crack cocaine is heated and smoked. It is so named because it makes a cracking or popping sound when heated. The most potent form in which cocaine appears, "crack" is also the riskiest.It is between 75 and 100% pure, far stronger and more potent than regular cocaine

http://www.crackcocaineaddictiontreatment.com/

One gram of pure powder cocaine will convert to approximately 0.89 grams of crack.The Drug Enforcement Administration estimates that crack rocks are between 75 and 90 percent pure cocaine.


This kiddies is how you blow away a "strawman argument"!

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 05:52 PM
Dude, I've done both, I've been there... and I KNOW crack's a more powerful drug.. they add baking soda(which activates it)cook it, pour off the crap and rock it up into something stronger...cooking cocaine makes it stronger, yes it does, ask ANY addict.


Yeah? So have I! I'm sorry if your mentality makes it hard for you to do it and then stop, but it IS in your head. I could sit here and do an eight ball of either, and not touch the stuff for another year. I'm sorry if you couldn't, but that doesn't change the chemistry.

Go look at ANY drug information site. I did the research before I ever DARED to use it. There is ZERO physical addiction, ZERO physical withdrawal, and baking soda doesn't do shit to the mix. All it does is enable it to BE rocked up. You could use baby laxative, or any of several other chemicals, just as well.

Coke HCL is what it imported, because it is the most versatile, being ready to snort or shoot. Cooking in water releases the HCL, hydrochloride molecule, which is what enables it to be absorbed through the sinuses. This more basic form, which can now be smoked, is then rocked for easy transport and consumption. Baking soda changes nothing, which is why it's the exact same buzz with any other agent in its place.

PC}{Magician
February 18th, 2008, 05:55 PM
Dude, I've done both, I've been there, and crack's a more powerful drug.. they add baking soda(which activates it)cook it, pour off the crap and rock it up into something stronger...cooking cocaine makes it stronger, yes it does, ask ANY addict.
No physical withdrawal my ass go fuck yourself jew.

Crack is more powerful because it's an instant high and IS more addictive, but it is not concentrated. :)

When cocaine is made it is not water soluble and is called cocaine base. The locals in Peru smoke this which is the purist of cocaine, along with chewing the leaves to numb the mouth.

They then add acetone, ether, and hydrochloric acid to form a crystalline powder, cocaine hydrochloride. This is your powder cocaine. It is then cut many times depending on how many hands it passes through and that is what the street buyer gets.

Now to get it smokable again all you have to do is add 25% baking soda to the cocaine and cook the cut and other chemicals out and you have free base or "crack".

Trust me, I know what I'm talking about on this subject....:)


Any problems with this post just look it up in the January 1989 National Geographic.

But concentrated..... no, not the word to use......:rofl:rofl:rofl

Thanks for the laugh....

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 05:56 PM
http://www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/drugs/crack.asp


"Crack" is the name given to cocaine that has been processed with baking soda or ammonia, and transformed into a more potent,smokable, "rock" form.

Cocaine is a stimulant that has been abused for ages; however,crack cocaine is the most potent form in which the drug has ever appeared

http://www.drugfreeworld.org/factsaboutdrugs/crack.html


Crack cocaine is heated and smoked. It is so named because it makes a cracking or popping sound when heated. The most potent form in which cocaine appears, "crack" is also the riskiest.It is between 75 and 100% pure, far stronger and more potent than regular cocaine

http://www.crackcocaineaddictiontreatment.com/

One gram of pure powder cocaine will convert to approximately 0.89 grams of crack.The Drug Enforcement Administration estimates that crack rocks are between 75 and 90 percent pure cocaine.


This kiddies is how you blow away a "strawman argument"!

And yet, there are no numbers to back ANY of this up. I LAUGH at the DEA's estimates. What kind of businessmen would our coke dealers, traffickers, and importers be, supplying 75-90% pure stuff to the streets? Shit, you can die off of 3 grams of pure coke. Look at what happened what Frank Lucas tried to supply 10% pure heroin instead of the usual 3-5% in NYC. He lost a good 10% of his customers to overdose in just a couple of months. It's for the junkies' own GOOD their stuff is watered down the way it is.

As I've just said, you DO lose the HCL molecule, so you COULD say crack is purer than coke. However, since Hydrochloride doesn't give you a buzz, you're not really losing anything worth worrying about.

Jett Rink
February 18th, 2008, 06:00 PM
What I have read is the difference between cocaine and crack is that a crack high lasts only 10 minutes and delivers a bigger punch.

Cocaine is more expensive and gives an hour long mellow high when compared to crack.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:04 PM
Well,hehe,I sure aint gonna argue drug abuse with such a well informed junkie like yourself....
I am slightly curious though,how such a devout religous person such as yourself reconciles his obvious love of a fleshly pleasure with his spiritually minded messiah?
What you say is a personal relationship to your Creator,I can now dismiss as a drug induced translation of a D&D session,lol.:rofl

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 06:05 PM
Crack is more powerful because it's an instant high and IS more addictive, but it is not concentrated. :)

When cocaine is made it is not water soluble and is called cocaine base. The locals in Peru smoke this which is the purist of cocaine, along with chewing the leaves to numb the mouth.

They then add acetone, ether, and hydrochloric acid to form a crystalline powder, cocaine hydrochloride. This is your powder cocaine.

Or take the low tech/natural approach, and use pine oil, which is turpentine.

PC}{Magician
February 18th, 2008, 06:08 PM
Crack cocaine is heated and smoked. It is so named because it makes a cracking or popping sound when heated. The most potent form in which cocaine appears, "crack" is also the riskiest.It is between 75 and 100% pure, far stronger and more potent than regular cocaine


:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

I love people who know nothing of what they post......:)

The cracking and popping is the baking soda that is not fully cooked out or cooking it wet before it dries. If done correctly it will not pop at all....

Again, trust me........:)

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 06:09 PM
Well,hehe,I sure aint gonna argue drug abuse with such a well informed junkie like yourself....
I am slightly curious though,how such a devout religous person such as yourself reconciles his obvious love of a fleshly pleasure with his spiritually minded messiah?
What you say is a personal relationship to your Creator,I can now dismiss as a drug induced translation of a D&D session,lol.:rofl

Yeah, I saw this coming a dozen posts ago. Once I've shown more informed than you, of course, that's when it's time for ad hominem attacks.

Anything but admitting you're wrong, isn't that right?

No, I wasn't ALWAYS a religious person. Never claimed otherwise. There are VERY few drugs I didn't try in my youth. Off the top of my head, I never even saw PCP, and I was too scared of needles to ever mess with heroin, although I took a pretty compehensive range of opioids right up TO that point.

You should try it sometimes. All that frustration you people have, instead of letting it fester to where you just hate everyone, try just smoking a freaking joint once in a while.

*edit*

No, I just can't pass up this chance. AS a religious person, not only do I believe that G-d put every person and every race here for a reason, but also every plant. The Bible refers to this over and over again. I'm not anti-western medicine, but I am very pro-natural medicine, wherever it can be applied. It is my belief that all these wonderful plants that we make our prescription drugs from were PUT here by G-d FOR that purpose. It's simply a matter of control. The government knows that coca makes some excellent anasthetics, and with some unique properties, being a stimulant rather than the usual depressant, like other anasthetics. They simply want to control what you do with your body, and let someone else tell you whether your pain is or isn't great enough to warrant a particular medication. I, as a libertarian, favor putting control over a person's body into their own hands, up to the point where they are using their body to hurt others.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:11 PM
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

I love people who know nothing of what they post......:)

The cracking and popping is the baking soda that is not fully cooked out or cooking it wet before it dries. If done correctly it will not pop at all....

Again, trust me........:)

Ok,I will leave the subject of nigger drugs to the evidently more schooled.It is good to see that you and the jew have found a common ground I suppose...

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:14 PM
Yeah, I saw this coming a dozen posts ago. Once I've shown more informed than you, of course, that's when it's time for ad hominem attacks.

Anything but admitting you're wrong, isn't that right?

No, I wasn't ALWAYS a religious person. Never claimed otherwise. There are VERY few drugs I didn't try in my youth. Off the top of my head, I never even saw PCP, and I was too scared of needles to ever mess with heroin, although I took a pretty compehensive range of opioids right up TO that point.

You should try it sometimes. All that frustration you people have, instead of letting it fester to where you just hate everyone, try just smoking a freaking joint once in a while.

Whooaa...thats heavy...
Are you having trouble hanging on to reality this time or does the occasional flashback sate your desire for grandeur?

PC}{Magician
February 18th, 2008, 06:16 PM
Or take the low tech/natural approach, and use pine oil, which is turpentine.

We in the U.S. will never get that opportunity because we will never get any coca leaves to be able to make the base out of. It arrives to us already Cocaine HCL.

To make the cocaine base coca leaves are smashed in a vat of sulfuric acid for about 4 days then the liquid from that is mixed with lime, gasoline, ammonia, and other chemicals to make the cocaine base. Then the other chemicals are added to get the street cocaine..... It's quite the process. I watched a 2 hour special by Jacques Cousteau called "Snow Storm in the Jungle" which was excellent. Watched it a couple time, years ago. Great show though on how it is done. The National Geographic article is also a great education on the subject.

One must know the evils to keep one step ahead of them Pale Horse......:)

Education is never a bad thing, try it......:)

Edit: It does help to have the National Geographic Magazine sitting in my lap.......:)

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:19 PM
One must know the evils to keep one step ahead of them Pale Horse......:)

Education is never a bad thing, try it......:)

So I guess you take it up the ass,to make sure your race propagates too?

PC}{Magician
February 18th, 2008, 06:22 PM
So I guess you take it up the ass,to make sure your race propagates too?

FUCK YOU ASSHOLE........ I"D LIKE TO SEE YOU SAY THAT TO MY FACE YOU FUCKING KEYBOARD COMMANDO........

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 06:23 PM
Whooaa...thats heavy...
Are you having trouble hanging on to reality this time or does the occasional flashback sate your desire for grandeur?

Nah, I'm fine now. After enough years of sobriety, I'm not even afraid to crack my neck while driving anymore.




(that's an LSD reference, by the way)

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:26 PM
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE........ I"D LIKE TO SEE YOU SAY THAT TO MY FACE YOU FUCKING KEYBOARD COMMANDO........

Your sensitivity to the subject could be perceived as an affirmative response.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:27 PM
(that's an LSD reference, by the way)

I'm impressed?

Frank Toliver
February 18th, 2008, 06:29 PM
You're so fucking clueless, it's almost unfathomable. You, what, googled it, and hit I Feel Lucky?

The military helped FUND it. Your article doesn't even MENTION the contributions made by Universities like MIT and Cambridge, which were... making it actually HAPPEN. They envisioned it, they put their students to work on it, with government funds, they supplied ARPAnet and DARPAnet, and then THEY went to work figuring out how to turn this CLOSED system into an OPEN system.

*edit*

AND lets not forget during this time, it was these same kids' weekend HOBBY that turned into the video game revolution.

Enter Stuart Brandt.

It's Brand, not Brandt you tool, and it doesn't matter if his wondrous idea was later incorporated into an electronic format, it was not part of the creation of the internet. And Wozniak helped make a home computer, one which would later attract millions of snide little fags as fans. You are giving these people credit for things they did not do. Show me the exact proof that these two guys are responsible for the internet, because that is what you are saying. Don't forget to include Al Gore.

I think you are getting way too much information from the guy selling sculpy pipes on a blanket in the park.

As for Wozniak, okay so we know he was NOT a hippie because

1) His CURRENT frontpage is headed by the sentence "Welcome to a free exchange of information, the way it always should be."
2) During his days in the Homebrew Computer Club, he helped people build their own, and GAVE AWAY BLUEPRINTS, even as he was starting a company.
3) He PERSONALLY invested in the US festival in the early 80's.


Wow, I go to concerts too, I give away free computers and I believe in freer speech and exchange of information than the jews do, I guess that makes me a hippie too. Maybe you don't understand what a typical filthy hippie hypocrite is; the hippie is an eternal pot smoking adolescent, who although spewing on about peace and brotherhood, is still so very silent about their parents being doctors and lawyers who send them to expensive schools and allow them the freedom to do nothing, knowing they have a safety net to fall back on. These are the same spoiled, shiftless, directionless people who still hates their parents, and by extension white society. And it is not enough for them to dislike it, but they do work to actively destroy white society, when it is white society itself which has allowed them the life of leisure they have.

What kills me about you people is that even though you talk like you're some kind of fucking revolutionaries, you ALSO hate those people who HAVE successfully been living off the grid for 40+ years?!

I hope you know that not only hippies subscribe to Mother Earth News, or that many of us are free energy, anti-government, organic farmers. You might want to check that out, read Kievsky's posts, he and I are what you might call Green Nazis. You might want to look at OTPTT, and his posts about building a life in the wilderness. You seem to be classifying all as some stereotype, does that word sound familiar you hypocritical bigot?

In fact, your problem is not that you hate the government, or that you hate being controlled, but rather that you think that that sort of freedom is even desired outside of white societies.

I call it jealousy. The Jews HAD their revolution, and they won. They have a homeland. The blacks HAD their revolution, and they won. They GOT their civil rights, AND rights to go to Liberia, for those that chose. What the fuck have YOU done? Sit and home, and bitch and moan to your little nazi buddies about how it's everyone else's fault you can't get ahead?

Well, then don't you worry, I am sure white people will do nothing but always sit back as you continue to shit on us. On the other hand, maybe, just maybe the only reason that jews and niggers had their revolutions (and they were really wars) was because of the rat like jews working together dishonorably (like declaring financial war on Germany) to achieve their goals of attacking and disrupting white society. I personally have a very good job, even in this shitty economy, and it is not that I am crying that I can't get 'ahead in life', there is more to life and a man's worth than money, but as a jew that is probably hard for you to understand.

And maybe, finally, white men have a way to contact other like minded white men after all these years of complete jewish media control telling us we should bend our knees to jews like you Matityahu. We are not disgruntled and mad because we are not succeeding, we are pissed because we found out what has been happening and how our whole reality has been warped by jew schools, and jew media. (And if you have anything to say about jews not controlling the media to the detriment of this nation, Ron Paul being blacked out from the media is proof enough.)

We have only yet begun to fight well, and we are on our way. Gone are the costume wearing tards, the 1488ers, and hypocrite farm boys who say the word nigger but hire spics, we don't want them, and we are something totally different.

That is precisely why you are here on our site, because not only are we growing large enough for your to care, but I think you have a mental perversity about you. We didn't come and get you, you came here.

So I would say since you love revolutions so much, you are gonna love ours, because it will be the biggest, the most earth changing, and the last revolution you'll ever hear about.

Now maybe you can get back on point to the original post.

PC}{Magician
February 18th, 2008, 06:30 PM
Your sensitivity to the subject could be perceived as an affirmative response.

Your the one that brought it up. I can always tell a fag by the way a conversations always gets steered towards gay shit.....

On that note, last post you get from me queer boy..... You are off my "respond to" list. Don't want people thinking I'M gay talking to fags.....

Bye queer boy.....:)

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 06:32 PM
Your the one that brought it up. I can always tell a fag by the way a conversations always gets steered towards gay shit.....

On that note, last post you get from me queer boy..... You are off my "respond to" list. Don't want people thinking I'M gay talking to fags.....

Bye queer boy.....:)
Buh-bye crack baby...

Dietrich
February 18th, 2008, 06:35 PM
.

.

.

.

.

.

.





I took time to give you the reply you asked for. You certainly are taking your time with a response.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 06:37 PM
I'm impressed?

I care?

Just don't go running your mouth about stuff you're clueless on, and you won't have to worry about what to do when you're proven wrong.

If you LIKE Big Brother, then by all means, keep supporting the DEA, along with the BATHFE, DHS, the IRS, and every other agency the feds want to shove up your ass.

*I* don't, and I know that personal liberty requires personal responsibility, which in turn requires EDUCATION. So I get mine, PC gets his, and you just talk.. Saying nothing, but still the lips flap.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 06:47 PM
Wow, I go to concerts too, I give away free computers and I believe in freer speech and exchange of information than the jews do, I guess that makes me a hippie too.

That's all fine and good, but now tell me how many Grateful Dead shows you've personally funded..... ?

Dietrich- My apologies, we got ahead. I'll get to it right now, before I finish the reply to this other post.

Karen Z.
February 18th, 2008, 06:50 PM
I love people who know nothing of what they post......

The cracking and popping is the baking soda that is not fully cooked out or cooking it wet before it dries. If done correctly it will not pop at all....

Again, trust me........
Like with freebasing.. if you don't mix it thoroughly it crackles and gets all over your face.. there is only a nice sizzle if done right.:)

Dude we used to rock it up for ourselves because it was just so much better, tastier etc., if concentrated isn't the correct word, what does it matter?

I would like to say that this was all in the past, and I never was a true addict, I always got tired of things I was 'addicted' to, as I am with any powdered intoxicant. Less like bored and more like sick of the cost and 'morning after'. bleh Especially now I scorn that shit and anyone who messes with it- too niggery.

Vegas247
February 18th, 2008, 06:59 PM
I am curius to wat the original argument was about on this topic between you two? interesting stuff I'm not getting into the middle you both have an interesting opinion. I believe Cheese Heroin is the strongest drug on the street right now in you are including what maniac figured out what to add to heroin. I found your post interesting and comical at the same time.... again not to take away from either points just stumbled across your arguments an found myself going wither way! ...

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 07:02 PM
Just don't go running your mouth about stuff you're clueless on, and you won't have to worry about what to do when you're proven wrong.

You've proven nothing...

If you LIKE Big Brother, then by all means, keep supporting the DEA, along with the BATHFE, DHS, the IRS, and every other agency the feds want to shove up your ass.


hmmm...hard choice here....Support the "good" jews or the "bad" jews...whatever am I to do?
Come to think of it the DEA incarcerates more niggers than anyone,and you on the other hand,give them money to buy more bling...hmmmm...hard choices indeed!

*I* don't, and I know that personal liberty requires personal responsibility, which in turn requires EDUCATION. So I get mine, PC gets his, and you just talk.. Saying nothing, but still the lips flap.

Oh,I sure am getting an education!Why just tonight I learned that a fellow WN soils himself on a regular basis (from the sound of it) with the nigger drug culture,which he shares with a jew,and they both vehemently deny the addictiveness of it.Yessiree I'm getting my education!
Personal liberty will not be obtained by enslaving your mind and body to the chains of a foreign substance,one that is traffiked by the DEA,DHS,and all those other alphabet organisations that you claim to hate.
Personal liberty is one of those catch phrases that you "enlightened" people have thrown around for a few centuries now.
You are in a sense correct,if we wish to "liberate" our society from jew scum who advocate killer drugs which also appear to "elevate" the niggers position in society,then we all need to take "responsibility" to treat you with the scorn and derision which you evidently relish in,as it allows you to be pushed from normal healthy society to the fringe,where you can live in the parking lots of concerts selling various foodstuffs and endlessly tout how you are "sticking it to the man" ,all the whilst becoming a breeding ground for new infectious diseases(from the act of abstaining from personal grooming and that of taking it up the ass,to get your education,so "evil" doesn't sneak up on ya!)

A. Black
February 18th, 2008, 07:05 PM
Quote:
Common sense dictates, no one wants to bother a powerful person, regardless of their race. If Blacks had earned a reputation of having more influential representatives within our race, versus the reputation we have now, do you actually think the average patrolman would risk losing all he worked for, just to bother a Black? Hardly!


That's going a little far.

Those I know who are in law enforcement all confirm that when pulling over what seems to be a wealthy, or affluent Black for a citation, will routinely treat the violator no different than anyone else. But when it's a younger, more urban looking driver behind the wheel, these officers are not just more cautious, but also more inclined to run their plates, look for other violations, and be more prepared to ask them to step out of the car. And in my own experience, when I was younger, I'd get pulled over, and ticketed on every traffic violation, versus now, being early forties, and having committed known minor infractions, like doing an illegal U-Turn in a business district, or even going over the speed limit, but yet be let off with a warning, and a "have a nice day." I guess it pays to grow old, and distinguished. So it's a fact, people who are associated with influence, and or good reputations are generally treated better during routine traffic stops.

I emailed you, have you checked your messages?

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 07:06 PM
That's all fine and good, but now tell me how many Grateful Dead shows you've personally funded..... ?


I was under the impression that being a hippy was synonymous with being anti-establishment...
So now I am to surmise that being one is equivalent to your ability to finance concerts?

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 07:14 PM
Dietrich-

You've back-peddled to mere classifications? This is a linguistic term, not a musical one. Well? What are you waiting for?

No, it's not linguistic at all. Put a full range of symphonic instruments into any culture which speaks any language, and they will classify them similiarly. Stringed Instruments, Wind Instruments, Percussion Instruments.

Of COURSE I'm not saying Ancient Israel invented the Fender Strat. But the modern instruments we all enjoy are direct descendants of the instruments the Tanakh records ancient Israel playing to give glory to G-d.


A "panel of judges" is not a form of government

Could have fooled me. We The People, in all 50 states said we didn't want abortion on demand, but a panel of judges said in 1973 that didn't matter... and sure enough, it doesn't.

Only the most infuriatiating example, to me, far from the only one. Originally, it was up to the jurors to decide Constitutionality. If no jury would convict a person based on a particular law, that law basically had no effect, and the police and prosecutors would eventually ignore that law, since they could never convict. Our first Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Jay, affirmed this right from this seat of authority. Modern courts have over-ruled it, and usurped We The People's power for themselves.

As per the Constitution, the U.S. is (supposed to be) a Republic, which is an anglicization of the Latin Res Publica, or, "A public matter." This is an essential difference between the U.S., Rome, and indeed the western tradition, and what is thought of as 'Jewish forms of governance.'

And yet, did the Roman system involve the checks and balances our SCOTUS was put there to provide? Wasn't it a more direct "representative democracy" ? Wasn't their Senate more powerful than ours? Wasn't it, in fact, a force of INSPIRATION for us TO have checks and balances on our legislative authority? Yes, a panel of JUDGES to affirm or strike down lower governments' rulings, first appears in ancient Israel. There's even a book that bears that name, if you doubt me.

Jews, if by only the nature of being Jews, are far less individualistic. Jewish leadership arises from the charismatic talker rather than the guy leading from the front. The Jewish intellectual stance is one of "Dogmatism; Submission to
Ingroup Authority and Charismatic Leaders. " These two forms are incompatible.

I can't really make sense out of this "guy leading from the front" ? what does that mean? Doesn't a charismatic leader do just that? Ancient Israel records two distinct government, one by a panel of judges, and also by Kingship. The Tanakh tells us that G-d discouraged monarchy, but that the people wanted to be like the other nations, so he relented and appointed a king for them. I could respond much better to this, if you'd care to rephrase it. For now, I'll move on.

In other words, you have hair beads or vicious-looking tribal masks, and you have the Sistine Chapel. Are you paying attention?

You have art the common people can afford and enjoy, and self-aggrandizing art paid for with money that was supposed to do G-d's work. Yes, I think I understand.

Re: Pythagoras

Yes, you can show me the bust from the Vatican, and I can show you the bust at the Capitoline museum, and what have we really proven? I can show you a million paintings of white Jesus, and it doesn't mean squat except that a million artists supposed he must look like them, despite His Jewish heritage.

I'm not sure why you'd say it's a CASUAL assumption that Pythagoras was a Mediteranean. He wasn't even Spartan or Athenian, he was an Ionian Greek. No wonder he was able to get some work done, without warring white people burning him as a sorcerer. He was born in Samos, a Greek island RIIIGHT off the coast of Turkey. But he was white, huh? As the guys in Monty Python used to say, Go on, pull the other one.

Ιουστινιανός
February 18th, 2008, 07:15 PM
Any stupid fuck who thinks this is as simple as "hate" isn't capable of having an intelligent conversation about this.

You don't know shit about us, spanky. Now run along and play a nice game of hide and go fuck yourself.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 07:32 PM
they both vehemently deny the addictiveness of it

Oh you just can't let it die! If I have to prove it, so be it. BUT go back and look, I NEVER said it wasn't addictive. I said it wasn't PHYSICALLY addictive, that it was 100% psychological. Go on, scroll down, I'll wait...

You back? Good, now follow along with me. I opened google, and entered "cocaine addiction." The first link contains references to what L Ron Hubbard (founder of Scientology) "discovered" hopefully we can all agree it's worth skipping? I found this after I saw that the front page did not mention the nature of cocaine addiction, and I clicked the Biochemical Nature of Addiction link at left.

that was cocaineaddiction.com

http://www.emedicinehealth.com/cocaine_abuse/article_em.htm-
"it lacks the physical withdrawal symptoms seen in alcohol or heroin addiction."

http://www.focusas.com/Cocaine.html-
"No individual can predict whether he or she will become addicted or whether the next dose of cocaine will prove fatal."

Same thing. Nicotine is PHYSICALLY addictive. So show me someone that smokes cigs, and unless they JUST started, and are going to quit within a month I CAN predict whether that person is or will become addicted to it.

The search produces many sites made FOR addicts, which don't SAY that there is a physical addiction, probably because they don't want the addict to feel bad about themselves. But they also don't say there IS a physical addiction factor, either.

I'll say it one more time, and you can accept it, research it, or deny it and live in ignorance.

Cocaine IS addictive, psychologically. It is not PHYSICALLY addictive. I don't care how much cocaine a person is doing each day, you can safely lock them in a room and sober them up and they WILL NOT DIE the way a heroin addict might.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 07:36 PM
I was under the impression that being a hippy was synonymous with being anti-establishment...
So now I am to surmise that being one is equivalent to your ability to finance concerts?

If you don't think the notion of being a hippie is INTRINSICALLY tied to notions like self-sustenance, entrepreneurialism, capitalism, etc.. then you don't know the first thing about the hippie lifestyle. You probably just bumped into some dipshit college kids on acid on their way to a Dave Matthews concert, and somehow confused them for hippies.

Sleuth
February 18th, 2008, 07:36 PM
Woohoo!

The edomite is starting to crack!!

Just a short while ago we had in our posession,the peaceful and tranquil edomite...




A few short and snappy posts later,we begin to see it's true nature....


It's feelings are hurt and it has chimped out. It can't believe anyone is still talking to it. It wants to show it is not soo dumb as it appears, and it talking something up it's alley, and has decided to be more of itself and drop all the pretentions (A crack smoking ngiger street punk) Because even it knows that anyone reading this thread http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=2150 then read a topic started by yahu, Zeiv and WWBM can easily see they are the same hate filled idiot.

1.) Overuse of caps, unpersuasive liberal arguements, overcompentsating self gradizing posts, extremely limited intellectual ability etc...


Which means you have an idiot having a 3 way conversation with itself, and the admins are too damn dumb to ban it. No wonder no one comes here anymore. But you are an idiot too, so carry on.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 07:39 PM
Of COURSE I'm not saying Ancient Israel invented the Fender Strat. But the modern instruments we all enjoy are direct descendants of the instruments the Tanakh records ancient Israel playing to give glory to G-d.

Yes, a panel of JUDGES to affirm or strike down lower governments' rulings, first appears in ancient Israel.


Ancient Israel records two distinct government, one by a panel of judges, and also by Kingship. The Tanakh tells us that G-d discouraged monarchy, but that the people wanted to be like the other nations, so he relented and appointed a king for them.



I find that an Edomite and/or Canaanite who constantly refers to accomplishments of ancient Israel as somehow part of his own heritage amusing.
The jews were not taken into Egypt(who also had all those instruments!),nor were they racially pure,as were the ten tribes of Israel.
Do you not know your own professed holy book?
I have provided many quotes from modern jew professors and from jewish publications affirming this.Judaism is merely Talmudism,you do not share the accomplishments of Israel.They were a seperate people,your people were taken into Babylon,where they received their religion and their further influx of foreign genetic material.
You are a bastard race,mamzers.Your ancestors broke the covenants of God,and your countenance bears witness of the sins of your fathers.
Your people are an abomination,and are to be known as "the people God has not forgiven".You are parasites and never have achieved any greatness other than what you have stolen.
Why does your Khazarian heritage bother you so greatly?

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 07:44 PM
Those I know who are in law enforcement all confirm that when pulling over what seems to be a wealthy, or affluent Black for a citation, will routinely treat the violator no different than anyone else. But when it's a younger, more urban looking driver behind the wheel, these officers are not just more cautious, but also more inclined to run their plates, look for other violations, and be more prepared to ask them to step out of the car. And in my own experience, when I was younger, I'd get pulled over, and ticketed on every traffic violation, versus now, being early forties, and having committed known minor infractions, like doing an illegal U-Turn in a business district, or even going over the speed limit, but yet be let off with a warning, and a "have a nice day." I guess it pays to grow old, and distinguished...

So let me make sure I have this straight. You're okay with profiling, as long as it's not happening to you? Even though it used to? No wonder these people like you so much more than they like me.

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

-Martin Niemoeller
Preacher in Nazi Germany

Pale Horse-

Your opinions are just that. I am interested in what G-d thinks, not man.

I never said I had a drop of Jewish blood in me. I am seeking conversion by choice, because the G-d of Israel IS the One True G-d, who was and is and ever shall be. My heritage does not bother me at all, because I know that race is of no consequence to Hashem, but only the condition of the heart, which is borne witness to by a man's ACTIONS, and whether or not he does what our Father asks of us.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 07:57 PM
If you don't think the notion of being a hippie is INTRINSICALLY tied to notions like self-sustenance, entrepreneurialism, capitalism, etc.. then you don't know the first thing about the hippie lifestyle. You probably just bumped into some dipshit college kids on acid on their way to a Dave Matthews concert, and somehow confused them for hippies.

And here I was thinking that they were communal,anti-middle class,anti-materialistic...

Dictionary:
hippie also hip·py n., pl. -pies.

A person who opposes and rejects many of the conventional standards and customs of society, especially one who advocates extreme liberalism in sociopolitical attitudes and lifestyles.
http://www.answers.com/topic/hippie?cat=entertainment

The hippies often cultivated an unkempt image in their dress and grooming and were known for practices such as communal living, free love, and the use of marijuana and other drugs.

Reminiscing about late 1940s Harlem in his 1964 autobiography, Malcolm X referred to the word "hippy" as a term that African Americans used to describe a specific type of white man who "acted more Negro than Negroes."

By late 1966, the Diggers opened free stores which simply gave away their stock, provided free food, distributed free drugs, gave away money, organized free music concerts, and performed works of political art.

Travel was a prominent feature of hippie culture, both domestic and international. Hippie culture was communal, and travel became an extension of friendship.

Hippies seldom worried whether they had money, hotel reservations or any of the other standard accoutrements of travel.

banjo_billy
February 18th, 2008, 08:00 PM
Of COURSE I'm not saying Ancient Israel invented the Fender Strat. But the modern instruments we all enjoy are direct descendants of the instruments the Tanakh records ancient Israel playing to give glory to G-d.

I met an Israeli kike last summer who was defrauding the government by working for cash with a moving company while on his tourist visa. He came into my store and wanted to buy a candy bar because he was fasting for some Jewish holiday and didn't want to eat any of the ham and cheeze sandwiches that I offered him.

So, I directed him to the Snickers bars and said, "Well, that's the best candy bar in the world."

"No, it isn't," he quickly corrected me. "We have better candy bars in Israel. They're called [some hebrew shit name that I don't remember] and they are really better than a Snickers, chocolate with lots of nuget."

Knowing how Jews always claim to be better at everything, I asked, "So, do they have peanuts in them?"

"Well, no," he conceded reluctantly.

"There you go," I admonished, "you lost another argument." And like every Jew that I have ever discussed anything with, he went away defeated.

It doesn't matter what it is, a Jew will always lie and say that the shit they follow is always better. They are all puffed up with lies and delusions.

As a matter of fact, the instruments that you are lying about were all invented by the Sumerians and Assyrians, the Greeks and the Egyptians. All the ancient kikenvermin did was steal other peoples stuff and said they were better because they were in Jewish hands.

Ma-tit-yahu, you are SO full of shit!

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 08:04 PM
PH-
Sooo... you think they just WISHED for the gastank on the microbus to be full, and it magically got them to the next tour date?

There is an element of communalism in hippie society. But it's the same sort of communalism that existed in the earliest Christian church (while Messiah was still with us)- VOLUNTARY, not enforced by politicians. Hippies share with those that don't have, for the same reasons Jews and Christians do- because it's the right thing to do. It DOESN'T necessarily follow that they want what is theirs TAKEN from them forcefully and given to those who choose not to earn their OWN way.

And how can one share with others unless one has something to share?

It is impossible. You can't help other people, unless you first help yourself. This is an ideal shared by hippies and libertarians. I strive for myself, not because I really want to be rich, but because the more I have, the more I can give away. That's something I picked up in MY hippie days that just happens to coincide with Judeochristianity, so I carry it still.

You suppose answers.com were standing in the front row at Woodstock, getting bumped into the barricades as Hendrix took the stage? What made you decide THEY'RE the authority on hippies?

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 08:09 PM
*pinches Billy's cheeks*

Well, Bless your heart! Aren't you just the cutest redneck since Shania? Aw... yep, he sure lost THAT fight. HIS candy bar COULDN'T have been better than YOUR candy bar, since yours has peanuts.

(*$#!ing retard..)

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 08:12 PM
Your opinions are just that. I am interested in what G-d thinks, not man.

I never said I had a drop of Jewish blood in me. I am seeking conversion by choice, because the G-d of Israel IS the One True G-d, who was and is and ever shall be. My heritage does not bother me at all, because I know that race is of no consequence to Hashem, but only the condition of the heart, which is borne witness to by a man's ACTIONS, and whether or not he does what our Father asks of us.

Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. John 18:36

John 10:26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.

These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and enter ye not into any city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Matthew 10:5-6

But he answered and said, I was sent only unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Matthew 15:24

John 10:31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.

John 13:33 Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me: and as I said unto the Jews, Whither I go, ye cannot come; so now I say to you.

Mat 23:33 Ye serpents, yerace of vipers , how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables , and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.

John 11:54 54 Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with his disciples.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-15 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us;
and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

Who is "us" in this verse? FELLOW ISRAELITES OF JESUS CHRIST! Who killed Jesus? "Fellow" jews? NO! The eternal enemies of Israelites, the jews.

Amos 3:2 2You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.

Deuteronomy 7:6
For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

HateThis
February 18th, 2008, 08:12 PM
Yes, targeted exclusively!

Unless you're Black, you have no argument.

But for the record, a wild Black will attack a White on average much sooner, than he will attack another Black, just based on programmed racial hatred, and or gang affiliation qualifications. This isn't a stat based on any study, it's knowing from the inside.

Please read:

Most Whites aren't the one's running around harassing Blacks. If/when a Black attacks a White, you hardly hear anything about it, and if you do, you will only be amazed at how the double standard will show it's ugly head, for the crime shall not be classified a "hate crime." But if it's the other way around, believe me, all hell breaks loose in the Urban Black community. Case in point, the Halloween attacks in Long Beach California, three little White girls were savagely beaten by a pack of thugs. Tell me, what kind of punishment was handed out to the perps? Why weren't the Civil Rights Activists crying out for justice? Why wasn't it ever considered a hate crime? And why were the thugs given only a slap on the wrist, even after continued defiance, lack of remorse, and having made a mockery of the justice system, by harrassing witnesses who were expected to testify. If that same thing were to happen to Blacks at the hands of Whites, there would be rioting in the streets. You're not Black, I am! I know all too well what many Blacks have to say, I hear it all the time. The strange, and mostly illogical reasoning these undesirables use is "well they were White, they deserved it," and you're defending this? If you are White, I'll guarantee, they'de do harm to you too, they'de judge you by the color of your skin, but not by the content of your character, and think nothing of it. The Dream, is a nightmare my friend, so Wake up! Not all, but many Blacks in general know they have a "race card" sitting in the deck, once again, not all, but many proudly admit to having some form of hatred towards Whites for no logical reason whatsoever. This attitude didn't just come out of thin air, it was put there by the P.C. guilt ridden Leftists. Many Blacks feel they are somehow owed something. You speak of how these low lifes attack other Blacks, as if that somehow is supposed to excuse their bad behavior. Do not patronize me. I do not care to challenge you on the economic performance of Whites, that is none of my concern, but for the untold many that would have otherwise been successful, had it not been due to the fact, they had the unfortunate circumstance of running into an ignorant pack of criminals, they would have otherwise been just fine in life, so that does mean the deck is stacked against Whites, especially when the perp is often able to get off on a light prison sentence, and be let free to go out, and practice all he has learned from behind bars. We all know Blacks have been afforded preferential treatment, this almost "protected Species" status which further stacks the deck against Whites. Your views in the hands of the powerful are what's got us upstanding Blacks caught in the mix with all the rest. We don't need your voice, or your sympathy. If you need to hear me say it again, I'm Black, I know what ignorant negroes have to say, I hear it with my own two ears, and do know all too well the race cards they are ready to pull, not you! There is no contradiction here, So yes, I stand behind everything I said, and you don't need to hear another one of the members of this forum tell you the truth about Blacks, because I'm all the Black you'll ever need to hear it from. :mad:

I think I owe you a response, sockpuppet notwithstanding.

Your argument is that your black, and that your blackness allows you to speak for all blacks, because you just know deep down inside they are intrinsically violent? got it.

I was educated with a few blacks who are intelligent, well-educated, philanthropists today, and have never robbed, raped, or murdered any blacks or whites but work productive lives with both, quite unlike the 'blacks' you are familiar with.

You are aware the extremist group you encourage wants to rob, rape, and murder indiscriminately these high-achieving blakcs, right?

Of course you are, which makes you as a black (even though I think your full of bs) particularly condemnable.

Quite telling no resident hate-junky-bigot has not yet attacked you, you know based on your skin color - not your character...:rolleyes:

banjo_billy
February 18th, 2008, 08:14 PM
*pinches Billy's cheeks*

Well, aren't you just the cutest redneck since Shania? Aw... yep, he sure lost THAT fight. HIS candy bar COULDN'T have been better than YOUR candy bar, since yours has peanuts.

(*$#!ing retard..)

Ma's-tit-yahoo, it don't matter a bit, the Jews will always tell lies about anything ... candy bars, musical instruments ... anything. And look, you're telling lies right now.

And now we have one of the oddest kinds of kikenvermin all rolled up in yourself. A wanna-be Jew-conversion model who tries to out-Jew the Jews in his idiocy ... and succeeding!!!

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 08:19 PM
Ma's-tit-yahoo, it don't matter a bit, the Jews will always tell lies about anything ... candy bars, musical instruments ... anything. And look, you're telling lies right now.

And now we have one of the oddest kinds of kikenvermin all rolled up in yourself. A wanna-be Jew-conversion model who tries to out-Jew the Jews in his idiocy ... and succeeding!!!

Exactly my point. Did YOU try the OTHER candy bar? No, probably not. So you don't really know. But you still thought your favorite was the best. So did he. What's the difference? Only one *I* can see is that you had an irrational hatred of him, while he didn't seem to have the same for you.

Pale Horse
February 18th, 2008, 08:22 PM
PH-
Sooo... you think they just WISHED for the gastank on the microbus to be full, and it magically got them to the next tour date?

There is an element of communalism in hippie society. But it's the same sort of communalism that existed in the earliest Christian church (while Messiah was still with us)- VOLUNTARY, not enforced by politicians. Hippies share with those that don't have, for the same reasons Jews and Christians do- because it's the right thing to do. It DOESN'T necessarily follow that they want what is theirs TAKEN from them forcefully and given to those who choose not to earn their OWN way.

And how can one share with others unless one has something to share?

It is impossible. You can't help other people, unless you first help yourself. This is an ideal shared by hippies and libertarians. I strive for myself, not because I really want to be rich, but because the more I have, the more I can give away. That's something I picked up in MY hippie days that just happens to coincide with Judeochristianity, so I carry it still.

You suppose answers.com were standing in the front row at Woodstock, getting bumped into the barricades as Hendrix took the stage? What made you decide THEY'RE the authority on hippies?

I have to retire to bed in a minute.
But perhaps tomorrow we shall review much of the hippy literature,music,etc?
I find it even more amusing that since your failure to adhere to what was commonly accepted by the hippy culture as their ethos,you also justify it(your failure) as a good thing.
Is there a greater paradox than the word of " Judeochristianity"? There are no two points of either religion that agree with one another.
I will also supply with with prime examples of the jew not sharing,lol,and in fact are presently taking from the rightful owners.
I will provide you better examples of their ( the hippies) anti-capitalist schemes from the very mouths of those that started the movement,if you wish?
Your desire for them to be capitalist is seriously a longing in yourself,for falling prey to the "me" generation that more aptly replaced you.It wasn't always about your greed was it?

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 08:24 PM
Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. John 18:36

John 10:26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.

These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and enter ye not into any city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Matthew 10:5-6

But he answered and said, I was sent only unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel, Matthew 15:24

John 10:31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him.

John 13:33 Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me: and as I said unto the Jews, Whither I go, ye cannot come; so now I say to you.

Mat 23:33 Ye serpents, yerace of vipers , how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

Tit 1:14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables , and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.

John 11:54 54 Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim, and there continued with his disciples.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-15 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us;
and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

Who is "us" in this verse? FELLOW ISRAELITES OF JESUS CHRIST! Who killed Jesus? "Fellow" jews? NO! The eternal enemies of Israelites, the jews.

Amos 3:2 2You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.

Deuteronomy 7:6
For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.

While I debate with myself, whether it's really worth my time to debunk what I've just affirmed 4X quickly is nothing more than poor translation, I have a couple of questions-

1) What translation are using, and (briefly) why do you believe it to be the most accurate?

2) Given that 10 of the tribes are lost, the remaining 2 being jewish and african, how do you suppose to apply ANYTHING said of Israel to yourself, or your kind?

Sleuth
February 18th, 2008, 08:24 PM
I have to retire to bed in a minute.
But perhaps tomorrow we shall review much of the hippy literature,music,etc?
I find it even more amusing that since your failure to adhere to what was commonly accepted by the hippy culture as their ethos,you also justify it(your failure) as a good thing.
Is there a greater paradox than the word of " Judeochristianity"? There are no two points of either religion that agree with one another.
I will also supply with with prime examples of the jew not sharing,lol,and in fact are presently taking from the rightful owners.
I will provide you better examples of their ( the hippies) anti-capitalist schemes from the very mouths of those that started the movement,if you wish?
Your desire for them to be capitalist is seriously a longing in yourself,for falling prey to the "me" generation that more aptly replaced you.It wasn't always about your greed was it?


What a silly cunt.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 08:27 PM
I will provide you better examples of their ( the hippies) anti-capitalist schemes from the very mouths of those that started the movement,if you wish?

You could try, if you really want, but it's about as effective as taking one or two Jewish quotes, and trying to pin them on the entirety of Jewdom-

Since both Judaism and hippie-ism DO so highly value individuality, diversity, self-thought and uniqueness, any person from either group speaks only for themselves. There EXIST no leaders for either group with authority to speak for the entire group. Leadership is decentralized intentionally, because conformity is the way of the outsider, to hippie and jew alike.

HateThis
February 18th, 2008, 08:28 PM
So let me make sure I have this straight. You're okay with profiling, as long as it's not happening to you? Even though it used to? No wonder these people like you so much more than they like me.

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

-Martin Niemoeller
Preacher in Nazi Germany

Pale Horse-

Your opinions are just that. I am interested in what G-d thinks, not man.

I never said I had a drop of Jewish blood in me. I am seeking conversion by choice, because the G-d of Israel IS the One True G-d, who was and is and ever shall be. My heritage does not bother me at all, because I know that race is of no consequence to Hashem, but only the condition of the heart, which is borne witness to by a man's ACTIONS, and whether or not he does what our Father asks of us.

Great post Matityahu! Besides cutting straight to the truth, your adversaries arguments appear only to corroborate yours.:)

banjo_billy
February 18th, 2008, 08:32 PM
Exactly my point. Did YOU try the OTHER candy bar? No, probably not. So you don't really know. But you still thought your favorite was the best. So did he. What's the difference? Only one *I* can see is that you had an irrational hatred of him, while he didn't seem to have the same for you.

Ma's-tit-yahoo, wrong again. You are so pitiful. That kike had tried both candy bars. When I mentioned the peanuts, he just hung his head and said, "No", defeated. He admitted defeat right there. While you are doing the usual Jewish stunt of ignoring your defeats and continuing with your bullshit, only to be defeated wherever you turn.

As far as "irrational hatred of him", wrong again, you dumb shit. My hatred of the Jews is very rational. There is nothing at all irrational about it.

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 08:35 PM
Great post Matityahu! Besides cutting straight to the truth, your adversaries arguments appear only to corroborate yours.:)

Toda, achi! ('Thank you, my brother!') You have said what I've been thinking as well. ;)

A. Black
February 18th, 2008, 09:29 PM
I think I owe you a response, sockpuppet notwithstanding.

Your argument is that your black, and that your blackness allows you to speak for all blacks, because you just know deep down inside they are intrinsically violent? got it.

I was educated with a few blacks who are intelligent, well-educated, philanthropists today, and have never robbed, raped, or murdered any blacks or whites but work productive lives with both, quite unlike the 'blacks' you are familiar with.

You are aware the extremist group you encourage wants to rob, rape, and murder indiscriminately these high-achieving blakcs, right?

Of course you are, which makes you as a black (even though I think your full of bs) particularly condemnable.

Quite telling no resident hate-junky-bigot has not yet attacked you, you know based on your skin color - not your character...:rolleyes:

Well, I'm sure to be at more liberty to do so than you would, Good buddy!

And I guess you're here to do what? Prove that you can move into an all black inner city neighborhood, where you get to say hi to all your good neighbors every morning, just like Ward Clever? ooOkkkaaaayyy! Oh no, you're gonna tell me you already live in tha hood, and have hoards of Black friends over every night to watch a basketball game, and suck down a few cold ones right? :rolleyes:

Hypocrite!

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 09:43 PM
What, are YOU scared of the all black inner city neighborhood? Even WHITES don't really NEED to be. It's all in how you carry yourself. If you act like a thugged out Al Capone wanna-be in white suburban society, you won't fit in.

Likewise, if even a black comes into a black inner city neighborhood, saying the things you're saying, it's their fault police harrass them, the police are our friends, even though they VERY rarely get charged when killing anyone wrongly, much less the profiling, harrasment, and beatings that go on every day... that it doesn't MATTER what the system does to "criminals" if you just follow the law, you won't have any problems?! Yeah, tell that to Mumia Abu Jamal. Tell that to the few law abiding CHILDREN that DID manage to escape a government-set fire in their home in Waco, Texas.

No, I'm not scared to go in any ghetto. Because I understand them. I don't fear them. I have been one of them. I may be more successful than some of them at getting OUT, and I have certain outfits I wouldn't want to wear, but on a planned excursion, a dare, would I do it at all? Certainly I would. Because people exist who are looking for reasons to put THEM in jail. I see more reason to fear those who DON'T have accountability. The police, the CIA, the President... the untouchables of today's society, who do what they want, and answer to no one. THAT'S who you SHOULD be scared of, if you're going to be scared of anyone.

tuisto
February 18th, 2008, 09:48 PM
[QUOTE=Matityahu;725696]

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent; communists=JEWS
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent; democrats = JEWS
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out; trade unionists = JEWS
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent; Jews = JEWS
I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out. Protestant without honor
and nation traitor = JEW tool

-Martin Niemoeller
Preacher in Nazi Germany


EVERY JEW-book swinging preacher is a disgrace for any nation and needs to be exposed as a parasite, infected with JEW-sickness.

Karen Z.
February 18th, 2008, 10:25 PM
No you jewey fucker, if you are a white female you deathly fear the ghetto, and whoever comes out of it, cause YOU GONNA GET RAPED.

THis is the jews doing, and will be his un-doing. SO MAD>:mad:

A. Black
February 18th, 2008, 10:26 PM
What, are YOU scared of the all black inner city neighborhood? Even WHITES don't really NEED to be. It's all in how you carry yourself. If you act like a thugged out Al Capone wanna-be in white suburban society, you won't fit in.

Likewise, if even a black comes into a black inner city neighborhood, saying the things you're saying, it's their fault police harrass them, the police are our friends, even though they VERY rarely get charged when killing anyone wrongly, much less the profiling, harrasment, and beatings that go on every day... that it doesn't MATTER what the system does to "criminals" if you just follow the law, you won't have any problems?! Yeah, tell that to Mumia Abu Jamal. Tell that to the few law abiding CHILDREN that DID manage to escape a government-set fire in their home in Waco, Texas.

No, I'm not scared to go in any ghetto. Because I understand them. I don't fear them. I have been one of them. I may be more successful than some of them at getting OUT, and I have certain outfits I wouldn't want to wear, but on a planned excursion, a dare, would I do it at all? Certainly I would. Because people exist who are looking for reasons to put THEM in jail. I see more reason to fear those who DON'T have accountability. The police, the CIA, the President... the untouchables of today's society, who do what they want, and answer to no one. THAT'S who you SHOULD be scared of, if you're going to be scared of anyone.

Is there anything wrong with coming onto a forum such as this, and confirming what is already painfully obvious. You are dreaming if you say no one needs to be scared to pay a visit to certain areas that are usually associated with high crime, lawlessness, and where most everyone is considerably more darker than you. Ok, so you've earned a few bragging rights, you've been to the ghetto, well good for you. But why should one have to dress, or act a certain way (like a thug), in order to not have the living daylights beat out of them? You never heard me say the law enforcement system is perfect, but it does stand to reason, if you generally are known to behave like a criminal, then you might just be treated like a criminal. No? It's great how you have such a bleeding heart for the underacheiving class of blacks the way you do, but your ability to sound almost like you're making excuses for all of the dysfunction within the black urban community is utterly deplorable. It's you apologists, that keep those blacks brainwashed to think the system is against them. You would not be welcome in my new land, and since no one here wants you in their's, well then I guess it'll just have to be back off to Tel Aviv for ya. Ok?

ben shockley
February 18th, 2008, 10:43 PM
What, are YOU scared of the all black inner city neighborhood? Even WHITES don't really NEED to be. It's all in how you carry yourself. If you act like a thugged out Al Capone wanna-be in white suburban society, you won't fit in.

Likewise, if even a black comes into a black inner city neighborhood, saying the things you're saying, it's their fault police harrass them, the police are our friends, even though they VERY rarely get charged when killing anyone wrongly, much less the profiling, harrasment, and beatings that go on every day... that it doesn't MATTER what the system does to "criminals" if you just follow the law, you won't have any problems?! Yeah, tell that to Mumia Abu Jamal. Tell that to the few law abiding CHILDREN that DID manage to escape a government-set fire in their home in Waco, Texas.

No, I'm not scared to go in any ghetto. Because I understand them. I don't fear them. I have been one of them. I may be more successful than some of them at getting OUT, and I have certain outfits I wouldn't want to wear, but on a planned excursion, a dare, would I do it at all? Certainly I would. Because people exist who are looking for reasons to put THEM in jail. I see more reason to fear those who DON'T have accountability. The police, the CIA, the President... the untouchables of today's society, who do what they want, and answer to no one. THAT'S who you SHOULD be scared of, if you're going to be scared of anyone.

tu prosto tupoi evrei, kotorogo vse prezirayut i pora tebya zasunut' v Warsaw ghetto

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 10:59 PM
Is there anything wrong with coming onto a forum such as this, and confirming what is already painfully obvious.

Which is what, exactly?

You are dreaming if you say no one needs to be scared to pay a visit to certain areas that are usually associated with high crime, lawlessness, and where most everyone is considerably more darker than you.

I don't think that IS what I said.

Ok, so you've earned a few bragging rights, you've been to the ghetto, well good for you. But why should one have to dress, or act a certain way (like a thug), in order to not have the living daylights beat out of them?

You act like profiling started in the ghetto! Why should a person have to dress a certain way, so they don't get treated like a criminal on a routine traffic stop? Or so they don't get followed around inside a store? Have we become such a society of fear that anyone not of our culture is automatically suspect? I KNOW these chuckleheads live that way, it surprises me to hear someone claiming to be a black man who has lived THROUGH harrasment justifying this way of life.

You never heard me say the law enforcement system is perfect, but it does stand to reason, if you generally are known to behave like a criminal, then you might just be treated like a criminal. No?
If YOU are known, then YES, that's fair. If I'M being stopped by Officer Jones, who has arrested me 3 times for posession of meth and twice for beating my girlfriend, then I can SEE why he'd want to check my pockets and my knuckles, before asking me what I'm out doing tonite.

If I RESEMBLE someone that commited a crime, no, it's not fair.

You want to know the first time I ever saw a gun? I was walking 2 blocks home from the convenience store, with a 2 liter in a bag, bearing the logo of that store. I was 14 years old. A cop car swerved into my neighbor's yard.. They HAD a driveway. The woman jumps out of the car, points a gun at my head, and tells me.. I'lll never forget this part "Get down on your knees! Put your hands on your head! Cross your ankles! Interlock your fingers!"

I sat on that curb.. a busy street.. for about an hour and a half, flashing lights going off, my neighbors creeping by, as people always do when there's an accident or an arrest happening. My brother had seen it, and gotten my mother to come down. I don't know what she said, but it didn't do any good. I was there another 1/2 hour after that point. After all of this, it turns out a 33 year old man who lived a mile down the road had stabbed his live-in girlfirend and taken off wearing a green flannel jacket. I had a red flannel jacket, and apparently the same color skin, so the age difference didn't matter. *I* was treated like a criminal WITHOUT having to act like a criminal. I was treated like a wife beater, though I had no record, and up until that day, thought the police were there to protect me.

You say that if a person acts like a criminal, it's fair to treat them as such, and I can agree to that.

But I tell YOU that if you TREAT people like criminals long enough... they just might start acting like criminals.

You would not be welcome in my new land, and since no one here wants you in their's, well then I guess it'll just have to be back off to Tel Aviv for ya. Ok?

That's the plan. Lashana haba Be'erushalayim.

Who says I want to live in either of your lands anyway? I still think Hillary's going to win, and I'm sure not sticking around to see if the country can survive THAT.

What's wrong, Ben? You can't say it in English?

Ze'ev
February 18th, 2008, 11:01 PM
Im thinking A. Black is not really black at all but a WN in disguise.

Vadler
February 18th, 2008, 11:06 PM
Im thinking A. Black is not really black at all but a WN in disguise. If he really is black then he deserves the academy award for his Uncle Tom performance.

A. Black
February 18th, 2008, 11:17 PM
Im thinking A. Black is not really black at all but a WN in disguise.

You're sure to hear from everyone now,

It's rather insulting for you to say any White National would want to impersonate a Black.

Time for the

**Popcorn** :rofl

Ze'ev
February 18th, 2008, 11:21 PM
You're sure to hear from everyone now,

It's rather insulting for you to say any White National would want to impersonate a Black.

Time for the

**Popcorn** :rofl

hehe

well u post some things agreeing with them.

I was accused of being a WN posing as a jew for posting things against israel etc...

Lol.

but yea, I think u are prlly one of the mod's here or w/e pretending to be what other blacks reading this might view as a black agreeing with them! (with the WN's that is) =0

A. Black
February 18th, 2008, 11:24 PM
If he really is black then he deserves the academy award for his Uncle Tom performance.

Historically the blacks that did the best in American society have always been the ones who were able to assimilate, and understand the requirements of being an upstanding citizen in Western Culture.

Yes they would call them an "Uncle Tom," but it sure beats the thug life. :)

Matityahu
February 18th, 2008, 11:28 PM
There is a difference between integration and assimilation.

But if indeed you are black, your choice of words gives us a keen insight into the way your mind works.

Prince_Vivid
February 19th, 2008, 12:03 AM
Those I know who are in law enforcement all confirm that when pulling over what seems to be a wealthy, or affluent Black for a citation, will routinely treat the violator no different than anyone else. But when it's a younger, more urban looking driver behind the wheel, these officers are not just more cautious, but also more inclined to run their plates, look for other violations, and be more prepared to ask them to step out of the car. And in my own experience, when I was younger, I'd get pulled over, and ticketed on every traffic violation, versus now, being early forties, and having committed known minor infractions, like doing an illegal U-Turn in a business district, or even going over the speed limit, but yet be let off with a warning, and a "have a nice day." I guess it pays to grow old, and distinguished. So it's a fact, people who are associated with influence, and or good reputations are generally treated better during routine traffic stops.

I emailed you, have you checked your messages?

I agree for that younger blacks are statistically more prone to crime and recklessness, it was the 'influential' part that threw me off. It seemed as if you were saying that if blacks were wealthier then white people would respect us more.

I e-mailed you back, some time ago. I am still waiting for your response.

Prince_Vivid
February 19th, 2008, 12:16 AM
Im thinking A. Black is not really black at all but a WN in disguise.

I'm beginning to wonder myself. The way that he capitalized the word white and lower cased the word black..And the overall adoration of white people. But, I could be wrong.

Dale VanderMeer
February 19th, 2008, 01:15 AM
The Talmud is, of course, a DISCOURSE, a discussion AMONG Rabbis, which usually disagreed with one another. Thus it is not possible to consider the whole of the Talmud to be the ultimate rule to live by, since it is not possible to agree with all the Rabbis on all the points of discussion.

The TalMUD is to us "gentiles" what Mein Kampf is to you jews.

You call Mein Kampf a book of "hate". However the TalMUD contains a massive admount of hate directed towards the goyum, that is us.T.J.B.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 02:21 AM
There is a difference between integration and assimilation.

But if indeed you are black, your choice of words gives us a keen insight into the way your mind works.

Well ize gues amma haves ta git mee sum watamellin, and chiken boss, so ize culd show yu ize realy be blaak.

Maybe I should be honored that my ability to demonstrate a fairly reasonable command of the English language well enough that it's raised some doubt in my true identity. But it just goes to show you, not all blacks are "ignant." T.N.B.

As to your having a "keen insight" into the way my mind works, ok Dr. Phil, you have the floor...

And finally...

I understand you may feel you're the only voice of reason around here, and everyone else is just a dumb, hateful yahoo, and or in my case, a sell out to my race, but do you think now would be a good time for me to consider you the true racist? Afterall, my posts seemed to have raised doubt, and are far too articulate for the average black guy to compose, right? Not to mention, I shouldn't be here saying any of it, I should be out taking care of some "nigger" business, making babies, robbing someone, you know, the usual stuff.

VijayCoomar
February 19th, 2008, 03:24 AM
bla bla bla boom bla baum bla bla berg berg bla bla.....


WHAT YOU ARE SPEAKS SO LOUDLY THAT I CANNOT HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.


Mr Coomar
Votary of the Occident
________________________________________________________________
The White Giant creates, the yellow man imitates, the nigger animal annihilates.---- Coomar

VijayCoomar
February 19th, 2008, 03:30 AM
bla bla bla

SHUT UP, Ape. black ass! Btw, i'm sorry ur mother WASHOE(www.friendsofwashoe.org/ - 12k) died.

Mr Coomar
Votary of the Occident
__________________________________________________ ______________
The White Giant creates, the yellow man imitates, the nigger animal annihilates.---- Coomar

VijayCoomar
February 19th, 2008, 03:32 AM
bla bla bla

SHUT UP, Ape. black ass! Btw, i'm sorry ur mother WASHOE(www.friendsofwashoe.org/ - 12k) died.

Mr Coomar
Votary of the Occident
__________________________________________________ ______________
The White Giant creates, the yellow man imitates, the nigger animal annihilates.---- Coomar

banjo_billy
February 19th, 2008, 07:13 AM
WHAT YOU ARE SPEAKS SO LOUDLY THAT I CANNOT HEAR WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.


Mr Coomar
Votary of the Occident
________________________________________________________________
The White Giant creates, the yellow man imitates, the nigger animal annihilates.---- Coomar

Now, now, Mr. Coomar, we are using here our intellects. Just telling someone to shut up, is the way the Jews operate around the world. And since we are all better than Jews, smarter and certainly better looking, this is a place where the Jews (and the Jew-wanna-be's like Ma's-tit-yahoo) can express their idiocy with their usual abandon.


Funny fellows like Ma's-tit-yahoo, can show what fools they are all by themselves, so why not let them?

VijayCoomar is an interesting name. Where are you from?

Karen Z.
February 19th, 2008, 08:10 AM
I understand you may feel you're the only voice of reason around here, and everyone else is just a dumb, hateful yahoo, and or in my case, a sell out to my race, but do you think now would be a good time for me to consider you the true racist? Afterall, my posts seemed to have raised doubt, and are far too articulate for the average black guy to compose, right? Not to mention, I shouldn't be here saying any of it, I should be out taking care of some "nigger" business, making babies, robbing someone, you know, the usual stuff.


If only you, and BIll Cosby, could reach your people- without getting called names. SIGH

VijayCoomar is an interesting name. Where are you from?
Vijay is an indian nazi. /rolls eyes.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 10:21 AM
Well ize gues amma haves ta git mee sum watamellin, and chiken boss, so ize culd show yu ize realy be blaak.

Maybe I should be honored that my ability to demonstrate a fairly reasonable command of the English language well enough that it's raised some doubt in my true identity. But it just goes to show you, not all blacks are "ignant." T.N.B.

As to your having a "keen insight" into the way my mind works, ok Dr. Phil, you have the floor...

And finally...

I understand you may feel you're the only voice of reason around here, and everyone else is just a dumb, hateful yahoo, and or in my case, a sell out to my race, but do you think now would be a good time for me to consider you the true racist? Afterall, my posts seemed to have raised doubt, and are far too articulate for the average black guy to compose, right? Not to mention, I shouldn't be here saying any of it, I should be out taking care of some "nigger" business, making babies, robbing someone, you know, the usual stuff.

So you can articulate. What about reading comprehension? Neither I nor Ze'ev (nor anyone) said anything like the things you're suggesting. It's the fact that you seem to hold so little sense of affinity towards Black America that you just admitted that assimiliation was your goal.

It's the fact that you seem to make excuses for profiling, UNLESS it's people in the ghetto profiling visitors, and THEN it's a bad thing. It's the fact that you say you've been through harrasment, yet still seem to hold the optimism in regards to the system that a suburban second grader might have after an "Officer Friendly" talk.

But no, I never said I believe you AREN'T black. I'm just not convinced you are. I don't feel the need to assume etiher way.

And finally, I don't claim to be the voice of reason at all, much less the only one. I am but a lost sinner, still here only because of the grace of Hashem, who has shown me a better way. If I try to show a better way, it can only be His. If I speak any truth, it could only be His truth, as all truth is of Him.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 10:29 AM
No you jewey fucker, if you are a white female you deathly fear the ghetto, and whoever comes out of it, cause YOU GONNA GET RAPED.

THis is the jews doing, and will be his un-doing. SO MAD>:mad:

LOL how do you figure? Jews, observant ones anyway, tend to form their own communities by choice, whether rich, poor, or anwhere in between, so as to stay close to the synagogue. So how do Jews have anything to do with what happens in the all black ghetto (which is the one we were discussing).

Also, if you as a white woman don't feel comfortable walking through the ghetto, I would say you could blame that on the white Christian society that prefers their women barefoot and pregnant. Judaism encourages strength, just as it encourages education, among women. Martial arts, marksmanship, there's gotta be SOMETHING you can do to stop feeling powerless. White Christian society thinks it's a feminine trait for a woman to be weak, scared, and to need a man to take care of her.

Personally, nothing turns me off quicker about a woman (or anyone) than fear. In addition to the above, it also shows an utter distrust of G-d.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 10:40 AM
I think I owe you a response, sockpuppet notwithstanding.

Your argument is that your black, and that your blackness allows you to speak for all blacks, because you just know deep down inside they are intrinsically violent? got it.

I was educated with a few blacks who are intelligent, well-educated, philanthropists today, and have never robbed, raped, or murdered any blacks or whites but work productive lives with both, quite unlike the 'blacks' you are familiar with.

You are aware the extremist group you encourage wants to rob, rape, and murder indiscriminately these high-achieving blakcs, right?

Of course you are, which makes you as a black (even though I think your full of bs) particularly condemnable.

Quite telling no resident hate-junky-bigot has not yet attacked you, you know based on your skin color - not your character...:rolleyes:

Even though I have already addressed you, to which I got no response, I feel it appropriate to further prove you are a waste of bandwidth, and of no good use to anyone's cause, but do serve to only help bring down, and destroy America, and it's people.

It should be noted that in one of your sentences, you accuse the members here of being extremists, who wants to do harm to "High Acheiving Blacks" Right? But only two sentences later, you go on to say, it's "Quite Telling No Resident Hate Junky Bigot Has Attacked" me, you know, based on my skin color, Right? Well, not only are you proving to anyone that will read this, that you are very contradictory, but more importantly, you are proving that the members of this forum, are in fact reasonable, logical, and intelligent enough to know who the Real threat to their survival is, and it's anyone who doesn't understand their valid concerns, regardless of the persons race. So who is really the closed minded racist?

Please read my Signature!

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 10:49 AM
Even though I have already addressed you, to which I got no response, I feel it appropriate to further prove you are a waste of bandwidth, and of no good use to anyone's cause, but do serve to only help bring down, and destroy America, and it's people.

It should be noted that in one of your sentences, you accuse the members here of being extremists, who wants to do harm to "High Acheiving Blacks" Right? But only two sentences later, you go on to say, it's "Quite Telling No Resident Hate Junky Bigot Has Attacked" me, you know, based on my skin color, Right? Well, not only are you proving to anyone that will read this, that you are very contradictory, but more importantly, you are proving that the members of this forum, are in fact reasonable, logical, and intelligent enough to know who the Real threat to their survival is, and it's anyone who doesn't understand their valid concerns, regardless of the persons race. So who is really the closed minded racist?

Please read my Signature!

It's really very simple. Contrary to what you may have been told, it IS possible for blacks to achieve something in life, without forsaking their roots, and simply becoming assimilated into someone else's culture. These are the ones (I believe) he's talking about.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 11:06 AM
So you can articulate. What about reading comprehension? Neither I nor Ze'ev (nor anyone) said anything like the things you're suggesting. It's the fact that you seem to hold so little sense of affinity towards Black America that you just admitted that assimiliation was your goal.

It's the fact that you seem to make excuses for profiling, UNLESS it's people in the ghetto profiling visitors, and THEN it's a bad thing. It's the fact that you say you've been through harrasment, yet still seem to hold the optimism in regards to the system that a suburban second grader might have after an "Officer Friendly" talk.

But no, I never said I believe you AREN'T black. I'm just not convinced you are. I don't feel the need to assume etiher way.

And finally, I don't claim to be the voice of reason at all, much less the only one. I am but a lost sinner, still here only because of the grace of Hashem, who has shown me a better way. If I try to show a better way, it can only be His. If I speak any truth, it could only be His truth, as all truth is of Him.

And if I was sitting in your position (non black), then maybe I too could show such affinity towards Black America, but the fact remains, I'M NOT! I'm Black, and as good as I wanna be, it will always be completely overshadowed, and engulfed by the far too many negative things my people do to others, and to themselves. So Stay The Hell Out Of MY Business, You Don't Know A F#%ing Thing About Being Black In America. :mad:

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 11:23 AM
Is the Black weatherman that makes it his mission to sounder whiter than the guy and girl at the news desk any different from the Jewish comedian that turns his back on his own Jewishness, because he knows he can "make it" a lot easier without the beard and peyot?

If you think you're the only cat facing these things, then you must see race everywhere you turn, just like these people. Self-loathing is neither new, nor unique to "upper class" Blacks.

But NOW we're getting somewhere. Now we're seeing that philosophy of victimology out of the supposedly assilimated black man.

"You don't know what it's like"
"You can't understand"

Maybe that's the real reason behind the ambitions of assimilation? Maybe you're afraid that you never can escape it? Not the reputation, but the philosophy? So instead of trying to be a successful black man, it seems better to try to be a successful man, that simply happened to be born black?

It is, of course, your choice to ignore or try to run away from your roots. You're far from the first, and certainly won't be the last.

I just want to make sure that you know that's what (it sounds like) you're doing. I'm not hearing a bit of concern about FIXING what is wrong with Black America, only escaping it. I'm not hearing anything about climbing up so that you can turn around and pull someone ELSE up to a higher level. I'm only hearing about YOU climbing up that ladder.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 12:00 PM
It's really very simple. Contrary to what you may have been told, it IS possible for blacks to achieve something in life, without forsaking their roots, and simply becoming assimilated into someone else's culture. These are the ones (I believe) he's talking about.

I will try with all my might to address you without leaning towards the hate that you, and anyone like you have the potential of bringing out of a person.

I myself, am one of those Blacks in whom you refer to. Just because I see what people like you are capable of doing to America, does NOT mean I have forsaken my roots, and want to assimilate into someone else's culture. I'm for upstanding Blacks, and only upstanding Blacks finding our own separate nation. For here in present day America, we are looked upon as being like all the rest. I am still viewed as a NIGGER! GOT IT! And am met with the same hostilities as A NIGGER. OK! The only way Blacks can earn their respect in a world that looks at us as lower, is by doing this. You will never know my position, or it's sentiments, so stay out of my business. They are not treating you as THE NIGGER. You do not hear me saying anything about how limey most people think a Jew is, because that's not my problem, it's yours, you must effect a change in the sentiments of the general opinion with regards to your kind, not me. But now after getting a good dose of a few of you here, I am tempted to change my opinion of YOUR KIND as well!

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 12:20 PM
I'm beginning to wonder myself. The way that he capitalized the word white and lower cased the word black..And the overall adoration of white people. But, I could be wrong.

I emailed you, but you NEVER replied!

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 12:26 PM
I agree for that younger blacks are statistically more prone to crime and recklessness, it was the 'influential' part that threw me off. It seemed as if you were saying that if blacks were wealthier then white people would respect us more.

I e-mailed you back, some time ago. I am still waiting for your response.

For some reason you are able to receive my emails, but I am not receiving yours. My PM here is active, others have contacted me by way of it.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 12:48 PM
Is the Black weatherman that makes it his mission to sounder whiter than the guy and girl at the news desk any different from the Jewish comedian that turns his back on his own Jewishness, because he knows he can "make it" a lot easier without the beard and peyot?

If you think you're the only cat facing these things, then you must see race everywhere you turn, just like these people. Self-loathing is neither new, nor unique to "upper class" Blacks.

But NOW we're getting somewhere. Now we're seeing that philosophy of victimology out of the supposedly assilimated black man.

"You don't know what it's like"
"You can't understand"

Maybe that's the real reason behind the ambitions of assimilation? Maybe you're afraid that you never can escape it? Not the reputation, but the philosophy? So instead of trying to be a successful black man, it seems better to try to be a successful man, that simply happened to be born black?

It is, of course, your choice to ignore or try to run away from your roots. You're far from the first, and certainly won't be the last.

I just want to make sure that you know that's what (it sounds like) you're doing. I'm not hearing a bit of concern about FIXING what is wrong with Black America, only escaping it. I'm not hearing anything about climbing up so that you can turn around and pull someone ELSE up to a higher level. I'm only hearing about YOU climbing up that ladder.

http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i504/71518.517retards.jpg
Be Gone!

Dietrich
February 19th, 2008, 12:52 PM
Dietrich-
No, it's not linguistic at all.
Yes it is. You started by saying the instruments themselves, then changed to the classifications. That's a linguistic change. The instrument exists as it is no matter what criteria used to classify it, or even what you name it. "A rose by any other name would smell just as sweet," and a violin named "trumpet" would sound as sweet as a violin. This is TJB, btw. Words do not make or break reality. Reality is independent of our labels. Honest men try to use the labels that most correctly describe reality.

Put a full range of symphonic instruments into any culture which speaks any language, and they will classify them similiarly. Stringed Instruments, Wind Instruments, Percussion Instruments.

I think most do, but not all. In India, they employ "gender" as a way of classification. That's a FAIL.

Of COURSE I'm not saying Ancient Israel invented the Fender Strat.

Why not? When someone calls you on it, continue to backpeddle and say that you meant the mere classification of stringed instruments. Call them a hater. That always works.

But the modern instruments we all enjoy are direct descendants of the instruments the Tanakh records ancient Israel playing to give glory to G-d.

You'll have to help me here, are you guys claiming now that the Tanakh is older than 35,000 years? (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/dec/17/highereducation.arts)

I always have a hard time keeping up with Jewish myths (http://hnn.us/articles/25292.html). =[

Could have fooled me. We The People, in all 50 states said we didn't want abortion on demand, but a panel of judges said in 1973 that didn't matter... and sure enough, it doesn't.

Let me help. Rule by judges is "jurocracy." That's a form of government. A "panel of judges," as you insist, is not a form of government.

Jews and feminism/abortion:
http://jwa.org/feminism/_html/timeline.htm
http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_id/15739/edition_id/307/format/html/displaystory.html

And yet, did the Roman system involve the checks and balances our SCOTUS was put there to provide?

Yes.

Wasn't it a more direct "representative democracy" ?

No. We've been over this. sigh

Wasn't their Senate more powerful than ours?
Depends on what and when you're talking about.

Wasn't it, in fact, a force of INSPIRATION for us TO have checks and balances on our legislative authority?

Yes, thanks for paying attention.

Yes, a panel of JUDGES to affirm or strike down lower governments' rulings,

Note here how you're too loose with your language. Courts strike down lower court rulings, not lower government rulings. There are no rulings by other branches of government, which are supposed to be co-equal. Here, watch this. Your judeo "PANEL OF JUDGES" were "religious thinkers." Our courts are open to the public, and our judges can be removed through legal channels.

first appears in ancient Israel. There's even a book that bears that name, if you doubt me.

Bears what name? "Panel of Judges?" I read "Genesis of Justice," but it was so much pablum.

I can't really make sense out of this "guy leading from the front" ? what does that mean? Doesn't a charismatic leader do just that?

In this context, not at all. Charasmatic leadership as expressed in Jewish history meant the guy killed the other guys and had a good rap. Our tradition of "leading from the front" was the guy who was leading by virtue of the fact that he was acting on his own and others followed. See: Tacitus' Germania.

Ancient Israel records two distinct government, one by a panel of judges, and also by Kingship. The Tanakh tells us that G-d discouraged monarchy, but that the people wanted to be like the other nations, so he relented and appointed a king for them.
Only in Jewish mythology do Jews "argue with God" and win. lulzworthy, itz.

You have art the common people can afford and enjoy, and self-aggrandizing art paid for with money that was supposed to do G-d's work. Yes, I think I understand.

If you're comfortable with that, that's fine, you'll grow out of it maybe. The rest of the world understands a fundamental difference between jewelry and a painting.

Re: Pythagoras

Yes, you can show me the bust from the Vatican, and I can show you the bust at the Capitoline museum, and what have we really proven? I can show you a million paintings of white Jesus, and it doesn't mean squat except that a million artists supposed he must look like them, despite His Jewish heritage.

Well, for one, Pythagoras posed for his likeness to be captured. OTOH, there is literally no contemporary evidence that shows that Jesus ever existed. To believe that the Jesus story happened, but the Romans wouldn't have a record of this (and they don't) is just happy-ass ignorant.

I'm not sure why you'd say it's a CASUAL assumption that Pythagoras was a Mediteranean. He wasn't even Spartan or Athenian, he was an Ionian Greek.
Oh no, they fought like cats and dogs. You're (again) getting yourself confused between Med as a racial type (as you used it before) and Mediterranean as a location. Yes, we today call that body of water, "The Mediterranean." No, the "Med" racial type we all know/love was not there in the same form as today. Yes, Pythagoras looked more like guys in my family (Germans) than contemporary Greeks. Same with Italians (as demonstrated with artwork from the time).

No wonder he was able to get some work done, without warring white people burning him as a sorcerer.

Are you getting 6th century Pre-Socratics confused with 14th century Christians? Help me out here with what you're trying to say. White people fought? Well yeah. Good point for you to make since Jews never fought. o_0

He was born in Samos, a Greek island RIIIGHT off the coast of Turkey. But he was white, huh? As the guys in Monty Python used to say, Go on, pull the other one.

OK, so let's follow your line of reasoning here:

Pythagoras wasn't white, but was "idealized" that way by the artist who was a contemporary of the subject. Care to explain why a contemporary would idealize someone to look more white? :D

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 01:08 PM
I will try with all my might to address you without leaning towards the hate that you, and anyone like you have the potential of bringing out of a person.

Why? If you've got hate in your heart, let it out. Why should you have to hide who you are, what you think? They don't. I don't. Why should you? "To thine own self, be true."

I myself, am one of those Blacks in whom you refer to. Just because I see what people like you are capable of doing to America, does NOT mean I have forsaken my roots, and want to assimilate into someone else's culture.

You act like it was an assumption on my part, when in fact YOU first threw out the word "assimilation"- An ugly Amerikan code word for separating oneself from their roots in order to be a part of the "melting pot." It's a goal no more noble than these people's. *I* believe we can be part of different
cultures, and still get along. *I* believe cultures don't need to blend into one in order for us to be a nation. *I* believe diversity contributes to our unique society. *I* believe it's why American culture is so popular all over the world.

But instead of speaking of "integration" you want to "assimilation,"

"Where an ethnic group loses distinctiveness and becomes absorbed into a majority culture."

I'm for upstanding Blacks, and only upstanding Blacks finding our own separate nation.

Are you serious? And where do you propose to put this nation? Regardless, that being as it is, I don't see why you're getting so pissed about what *I'M* saying. You've just confirmed it for us- You have no interest in improving the lot or the attitude of this ignorant majority you allege in Black America.

You HAVE turned your backs on them. So what's the problem with me saying it?


For here in present day America, we are looked upon as being like all the rest. I am still viewed as a NIGGER! GOT IT! And am met with the same hostilities as A NIGGER.

By WHOM? A bunch of insecure pale skinned yokels with penis envy? @$#% them. They're not going to view you as anything else, no matter how long you kiss their asses.


OK! The only way Blacks can earn their respect in a world that looks at us as lower, is by doing this.

Is that right? So Madame CJ Walker, J.C. Penney, Oprah, Thurgood Marshall, Rev King, Frederick Douglass, Duke Ellington, and any other African American who has achieved respect in America has done so by turning their backs on what they viewed as "lesser" Blacks, and adopting the de facto Satanic outlook of just looking out for "Number One" ?

Is that REALLY what you're suggesting?


You will never know my position, or it's sentiments, so stay out of my business. They are not treating you as THE NIGGER.

Oh please. These people view Jews as lower than Blacks, and if I were to wager a guess, I'd say they probably look down even more on a Jewish convert than a born Jew... particularly if they followed you in assuming I was white.


You do not hear me saying anything about how limey most people think a Jew is, because that's not my problem, it's yours, you must effect a change in the sentiments of the general opinion with regards to your kind, not me. But now after getting a good dose of a few of you here, I am tempted to change my opinion of YOUR KIND as well!

Yep. I suppose it is. But I'll tell you one thing, I'm not about to do it by hiding from myself, by turning my back on my people. And I'm not going to do it by pretending I'm better than the rest of them. If Jewish culture needs improved (it does) then it will be achieved through a sense of community, and social obligations, not trying to claw your way out of where you came from and never looking back.

But if you're going to condemn me for challenging you to have a sense of social responsibility towards your own people, then you might as well hate them all the more. Because I didn't get that from Jewish culture, but from Black culture- from the Infinity lessons, from the Temple of Hip Hop, from Mos Def, and KRS-ONE

"It's easy for cats to kill other cats. It's just the dogs we have problems with"
-Wyclef Jean The Score

NS Cat
February 19th, 2008, 01:18 PM
Originally posted by jew
He was born in Samos, a Greek island RIIIGHT off the coast of Turkey. But he was white, huh? As the guys in Monty Python used to say, Go on, pull the other one.

You are a jew and because of it you like to lie.

Ancient turkey was called Asia Minor. Modern Turks are Asiatic mongrels.
However the Mongol hordes only invaded Asia minor about a thousand years ago.

Pythagoras was born much earlier than that.

That land area had similar racial composition to the rest of Europe at that time.

The bible mentions some of the different tribe living there. I think there was a Celtic tribe living there called the Galicians.

200 years from now when White people are a tiny minority on the British Isles due to race mixing and mass immigration all promoted by jews like yourself people like me will say that King Arthur was a White man and people like you will laugh at me and say that he was a nigger or a paki because those would be the people inhabiting England at the time.

Jane_Doe#5
February 19th, 2008, 01:22 PM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with.

You know, Its one thing if you want to disagree with what we feel or our beliefs.

Its pure ignorance to state a coalition with similar beliefs and values wont succeed because of infighting, or minor differences within the group.

Allies in wars dont always completely agree with one another, they just band together for the common interest or value they share. And infighting and minor differences, are inconsequential. Look at the Christian faith. Christianity has been amazingly successful for two thousand years, despite the fact that its inner sects cant even agree on the proper way to worship the same 'god'.

Youre way off-target. Maybe you need a cranio-anal lobotomy. '-)

Sándor Petőfi
February 19th, 2008, 01:26 PM
He was born in Samos, a Greek island RIIIGHT off the coast of Turkey. But he was white, huh? As the guys in Monty Python used to say, Go on, pull the other one.

Whether inhabited by Pelasgians, Hellenes or Byzantines, Asia Minor was historically never anything but Caucasian before the Turkish invasions. Who's the idiot now, confusing contemporary enthography with ancient population distributions?

Sándor Petőfi
February 19th, 2008, 01:31 PM
You are a jew and because of it you like to lie.

Ancient turkey was called Asia Minor. Modern Turks are Asiatic mongrels.
However the Mongol hordes only invaded Asia minor about a thousand years ago.

Pythagoras was born much earlier than that.

That land area had similar racial composition to the rest of Europe at that time.

The bible mentions some of the different tribe living there. I think there was a Celtic tribe living there called the Galicians.

200 years from now when White people are a tiny minority on the British Isles due to race mixing and mass immigration all promoted by jews like yourself people like me will say that King Arthur was a White man and people like you will laugh at me and say that he was a nigger or a paki because those would be the people inhabiting England at the time.

NS, you're dealing with a Negroid animal whose knowledge of "history" consists of what he saw on television and read in a "book" by Martin Bernal. Arguing with a Negroid is as productive as arguing with your pet capuchin.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 01:32 PM
Why? If you've got hate in your heart, let it out. Why should you have to hide who you are, what you think? They don't. I don't. Why should you? "To thine own self, be true."



You act like it was an assumption on my part, when in fact YOU first threw out the word "assimilation"- An ugly Amerikan code word for separating oneself from their roots in order to be a part of the "melting pot." It's a goal no more noble than these people's. *I* believe we can be part of different
cultures, and still get along. *I* believe cultures don't need to blend into one in order for us to be a nation. *I* believe diversity contributes to our unique society. *I* believe it's why American culture is so popular all over the world.

But instead of speaking of "integration" you want to "assimilation,"

"Where an ethnic group loses distinctiveness and becomes absorbed into a majority culture."



Are you serious? And where do you propose to put this nation? Regardless, that being as it is, I don't see why you're getting so pissed about what *I'M* saying. You've just confirmed it for us- You have no interest in improving the lot or the attitude of this ignorant majority you allege in Black America.

You HAVE turned your backs on them. So what's the problem with me saying it?




By WHOM? A bunch of insecure pale skinned yokels with penis envy? @$#% them. They're not going to view you as anything else, no matter how long you kiss their asses.




Is that right? So Madame CJ Walker, J.C. Penney, Oprah, Thurgood Marshall, Rev King, Frederick Douglass, Duke Ellington, and any other African American who has achieved respect in America has done so by turning their backs on what they viewed as "lesser" Blacks, and adopting the de facto Satanic outlook of just looking out for "Number One" ?

Is that REALLY what you're suggesting?



Oh please. These people view Jews as lower than Blacks, and if I were to wager a guess, I'd say they probably look down even more on a Jewish convert than a born Jew... particularly if they followed you in assuming I was white.



Yep. I suppose it is. But I'll tell you one thing, I'm not about to do it by hiding from myself, by turning my back on my people. And I'm not going to do it by pretending I'm better than the rest of them. If Jewish culture needs improved (it does) then it will be achieved through a sense of community, and social obligations, not trying to claw your way out of where you came from and never looking back.

But if you're going to condemn me for challenging you to have a sense of social responsibility towards your own people, then you might as well hate them all the more. Because I didn't get that from Jewish culture, but from Black culture- from the Infinity lessons, from the Temple of Hip Hop, from Mos Def, and KRS-ONE

"Self destruction don't pay the #@$&ing rent!"

http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i504/71518.517retards.jpg
I hate no one, you are a rabble rouser. Worry about your own business, and don't worry about mine. Even if it were not the Whites who would hate me, it would still be the mestizos, you want to stay here, and work out this massive pile of crap your kind brought about, then fine, but as for me, and mine, we have other plans.
Be Gone!

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 01:33 PM
. Look at the Christian faith. Christianity has been amazingly successful for two thousand years, despite the fact that its inner sects cant even agree on the proper way to worship the same 'god'.



I'd say that depended on how you define "success."

If you're talking about political conqest, sure, they've been successful. But was that ever really Yeshua's (Jesus') goal? No, I'd say the infighting caused the entire mission of that movement to shift in entirely different direction.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 01:37 PM
http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i504/71518.517retards.jpg
I hate no one, you are a rabble rouser. Worry about your own business, and don't worry about mine. Even if it were not the Whites who would hate me, it would still be the mestizos, you want to stay here, and work out this massive pile of crap your kind brought about, then fine, but as for me, and mine, we have other plans.
Be Gone!

You don't understand what I'm saying? I think you don't WANT to understand. What is "my kind" ? And what "massive pile of crap" did they bring about? I thought I was a little more to the point than THAT. You just said you were resisting hate, and you blamed it on ME for bringing it out of you. Okay, if you hate no one, that's a good start. Next would be to LOVE, and I always suggest that start closest to home (i.e. with one's own people).

banjo_billy
February 19th, 2008, 01:43 PM
I will try with all my might to address you without leaning towards the hate that you, and anyone like you have the potential of bringing out of a person.
.... They are not treating you as THE NIGGER. You do not hear me saying anything about how limey most people think a Jew is, because ....!

A. Black,

It looks like you don't understand Ma's-tit-yahoo at all. This is a white guy who thinks that he can convert to Judaism and become a Jew. He's not a real Jew, just a fake one. He is like those white clowns who dress, act, talk, and try to think like a Negro. Kind of like an Eminim but worse. I am sure you have met the type, they try to mimic being a Negro and talking with a Negro dialect, and think that they are cool, and then they start telling everybody what it's like to be a Negro. And maybe even standing in a parade demanding that they be paid reparations for black slavery, too, just because they talk jive and wear dreadlocks. It's really quite funny except its such a sad representation of mental distrubance that you can't really laugh at them.

And that's what Ma's-tit-yahoo does. He is a pseudo-kike, versed in all manner of verses from the Bible, eatting kosher food, schlepping his bagels home everyday and schmoozing with the old liars from Europe who have ten dollar numbers tatooed on their arms so that they can get that reparations check.

So, please don't let him get you upset or angry because he is a fool. You see, he is already telling you what it is like to be black. Isn't that what the Jews all do? Telling everybody else how to be like the Jews imagine that they should be, simply because they consider themselves so smart that no matter what lies they tell, their drivel must be accepted as true. Be careful, he lies like a Jew, but he really isn't a Jew ... he's a mimic.

Have pity on the fools.

Troy Alexander
February 19th, 2008, 01:46 PM
Matiyahu, do you have a job?

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 01:50 PM
Matiyahu, do you have a job?

Sure do. A few of them actually. My dream job laid me off on 9-11, so I'll never again depend on one source of income for my survival. I'll wet my beak in whatever I can. How about you?

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 01:56 PM
Whether inhabited by Pelasgians, Hellenes or Byzantines, Asia Minor was historically never anything but Caucasian before the Turkish invasions. Who's the idiot now, confusing contemporary enthography with ancient population distributions?

I say what I ever did.. that if there any idiots around here, it's the ones that have to focus on, to the point of making assumptions on the ethnicity of every person present OR past, and will even go so far as to twist history, so that they can keep on believing their own race to be the catalyst for every social movement and art form. Personally, I don't really care what race Pythagoras was. I only threw it in there as a joke, and you people get so worked up at the IDEA of an intelligent non-Aryan that what? 3 pages later? We're still talking about it.

Troy Alexander
February 19th, 2008, 01:58 PM
My dream job laid me off on 9-11,

Never knew they had a Mcdonalds at the WTC

banjo_billy
February 19th, 2008, 01:58 PM
Whether inhabited by Pelasgians, Hellenes or Byzantines, Asia Minor was historically never anything but Caucasian before the Turkish invasions. Who's the idiot now, confusing contemporary enthography with ancient population distributions?

Always good to see your intelligent posts, Sándor. Back kicking ass once again. Very good. :D

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 02:02 PM
Never knew they had a Mcdonalds at the WTC

No, I don't live in NY, and no there were no McD's in the Compaq plant I was working.. Just a bunch of Pentium 5 chips for those machines we were building for the government... which the public still has never seen.


Jewish conspiracy? Eh, it always is with you people.

Prince_Vivid
February 19th, 2008, 02:10 PM
For some reason you are able to receive my emails, but I am not receiving yours. My PM here is active, others have contacted me by way of it.

As I told you before, I am banned. BTW, your name surname doesn't seem European...

Sándor Petőfi
February 19th, 2008, 02:13 PM
I say what I ever did [?].. that if there [sic] any idiots around here, it's the ones that have to focus on [?], to the point of making assumptions on the ethnicity of every person present OR past,

A translation into English would be helpful.

and will even go so far as to twist history,

You are twisting history.

so that they can keep on believing their own race

Well, it is an empirical fact, for example, that around 97% of the world's scientific and technological discoveries originate from the past few hundred years of Western European culture.

to be the catalyst for every social movement and art form.

Oh no. The Jews, for example, gave us Marxism, Feminism and Postmodernism, not to mention the slave-revolt in morality.

Personally, I don't really care what race Pythagoras was.

Oh, we realise that. You are an ahistorical individual without a past or a future.

I only threw it in there as a joke, and you people get so worked up at the IDEA of an intelligent non-Aryan that what?

No, we simply won't have niggers spreading lies here.

A. Black
February 19th, 2008, 02:15 PM
A. Black,

It looks like you don't understand Ma's-tit-yahoo at all. This is a white guy who thinks that he can convert to Judaism and become a Jew. He's not a real Jew, just a fake one. He is like those white clowns who dress, act, talk, and try to think like a Negro. Kind of like an Eminim but worse. I am sure you have met the type, they try to mimic being a Negro and talking with a Negro dialect, and think that they are cool, and then they start telling everybody what it's like to be a Negro. And maybe even standing in a parade demanding that they be paid reparations for black slavery, too, just because they talk jive and wear dreadlocks. It's really quite funny except its such a sad representation of mental distrubance that you can't really laugh at them.

And that's what Ma's-tit-yahoo does. He is a pseudo-kike, versed in all manner of verses from the Bible, eatting kosher food, schlepping his bagels home everyday and schmoozing with the old liars from Europe who have ten dollar numbers tatooed on their arms so that they can get that reparations check.

So, please don't let him get you upset or angry because he is a fool. You see, he is already telling you what it is like to be black. Isn't that what the Jews all do? Telling everybody else how to be like the Jews imagine that they should be, simply because they consider themselves so smart that no matter what lies they tell, their drivel must be accepted as true. Be careful, he lies like a Jew, but he really isn't a Jew ... he's a mimic.

Have pity on the fools.

Thanks for that,

It's pretty obvious WN's will have their work cut out for them. *sigh* :(

I do pity him, and have seen this type many times before.

Funny thing is, how can anyone have respect for what he is saying, when he accuses everyone else of this, and that, but yet refuses to declare who he really is, a rather trollish position if you ask me. I came here to confirm to any reasonable, and logically minded person who might still be on the fence, that what they may have been wondering all the while, is in fact the truth, never with any intentions of bringing down the integrity of this forum, but yet reaffirming that the truth to your struggles, are so obvious that even a Black man could see it. You all have met me, got to know my views, and I yours, like it, or not it's the real me. Wish I could say the same for some others???

Good Luck!

Jane_Doe#5
February 19th, 2008, 02:15 PM
I'd say that depended on how you define "success."

If you're talking about political conqest, sure, they've been successful. But was that ever really Yeshua's (Jesus') goal? No, I'd say the infighting caused the entire mission of that movement to shift in entirely different direction.

I agree with you completely, I think modern christianity is a total bastardization and the ultimate cluster-fuck of what Jesus wanted, but I was speaking purely in terms of 'political conquest', as you put it.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 02:28 PM
Funny thing is, how can anyone have respect for what he is saying, when he accuses everyone else of this, and that, but yet refuses to declare who he really is, a rather trollish position if you ask me.

It's really quite simple. The color of my skin has no bearing on MY words, because unlike yours and theirs, MY position would equally be valid from a person of ANY race. My identity is not DEFINED by race, either by embracing it... or avoiding it.

This whole exchange simply confirms it in my mind. Either you're not black, or you're the biggest caricature of all. Clayton Bigsby and Uncle Ruckus, all rolled into one.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 02:38 PM
No, we simply won't have niggers spreading lies here.

Yes, of course. Only white nationalists are allowed to spread lies in THESE parts. My apologies. :D

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 03:02 PM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. This jew's opinion stated as simple fact. Projection of it's tribes own actions, onto Whites.

Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. You mean like It'z-a-lie? The chutzpathetic hypocrissy of the eternal jew still amazes me after all this time.

It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You mean like the jewish zionists?

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with. Just ask the jews. Their whole sytem of hate is collapsing all around them. Leave it to the jew to lament over not being able to cheat and get away with it.

That's the point! It is as simple minded as you can get.


In fact it has nothing to do withthe mind rather the limbic system - an entirely animal origin anatomy - or as you like to say nigg-, black people???

Right, so what is it about Channon Christian and Chris Newsoms murderers that is unlike you? thought so. ???

I thnk your pre-frontal cortex has atrophied.

Your error is you think based on your emotions. You mean like jews?

Need more evidence your drug is your hormones?
Depends. Is it jewish evidence?(Lies, 'testiomonials' and memes), If so, you have provided quite enough, thanks.

Christian and Newsoms conduct aren't being questioned here, THEIR MURDERERS ARE.
I bet that really pisses you off too. How dare these feral nigger savages be investigated and prosecuted for brutally raping mutillating and murdering both Christian, and Newsome??? T.J.B.

The rest of your post is a hate-junkies trip. Truly astounding debate skills, jew. :rolleyes:

Only you nuts believe you're under siege by the jews, spics, niggers.... Insinuation that you're crazy if you believe the jew is behind forced intergration, check.

You are your own worst argument. Another brilliant jewish pearl.

Your error is that you're too concerned about what other people think about you. And go figure - for an entirely hormonal reward.
???

Hitler trying to take over HIS neighbors was somehow more justified than African tribes trying to take over THEIR neighbors? Meme that AH was a meglomaniac, bent on world domination, check.:rolleyes:

The ignorance of your "nation" shows itself with every successive post.
Kewlies usage of the word "ignorace", a jewish buzz word, used and abused by niggers since the 60's. Very original, jew.

the existence of the internet owes to such visionary hippies as Stuart Brandt and Steve Wozniak. I never knew that jewish hippies invented the internet, I always thought it was Al Gore wut did that. Thanks for your always truthful and unbiased jewish facts, jew.

...I'm sure if you could make an argument, you would
Not that this jew would pay it any mind, or anything...

So please tell us what you have created, that your great white nation may take pride in... Meme inferring that since you in particular have not invented, or created anything of signifigance to civilization, you are somehow lesser, though this jew neglects to remind us of such great jewish inventions that it has provided to the betterment of world wide jewry. Sorry jew, usury, genocide, White abortion, political cowardice, and apartheid have already been claimed by jews, other than yourself.

Please, do not confuse western innovation and creativity with your middle-aged 'thinking.' Thank you. It's so much easier to laugh at you when you actually make sense, jew. Please make sense. Thank you.

I've already mentioned that I'm not in fact, Jewish, either by blood or by conversion.

Some day I plan to undergo Bar Mitzvah, and move to the Holy Land, but you're not Jewish unless you're Jewish, and right now, I'm not.
Once again, please make some fucking sense, will you? Thanks.

I suppose since you morons think of Jews somewhat like vampires, you might as well think of me as a "familiar."
Actually, we think of you as parasites. Nice attempt to glamourize yourself, jewlywierd style though, parasite.

Heck I didn't realize I was a prophet, but you're just proving my point for me. Delusions of divinity, thanks to us. Check.

The more you talk, the more your ignorance shows itself.
Idiocy, hypocrissy or chutzpah? You decide.

Music? Get REAL! What has white Europe contributed to music? The Piano? THAT'S about it. You hear that White Man? You better keep it real all up in the field, cuz the almighty jew not only invented the internet, it invented music too! :rofl

Stringed instruments, horns, drums, and all sorts of other musical instruments were in fact borrowed or adapted from other cultures, many of which are actually mentioned EARLIEST in JEWISH culture, in the Tanakh.
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

Even the music STYLES have benefited from the multiculturalism that you all hate so much. Sure if your style is being a nigger trying to get White pussy...

Why the entire American political system is borrowed from previous cultures. It is the EPITOME of multiculturalism.
Yes, and that would be White European cultures, particularly British culture. Last time I checked, this country was built by Whites, for Whites. I wonder if you really believe your own bullshit...

The Legislative branch represented their admiration (tempered with apprehension, obviously) for the Greco-Roman notions of democracy/republicanism, which by the way are another shining example of how whites WILL make war on SOMEbody, even if there aren't many non-whites around on which to blame their problems.
Boy oh boy. You must be fresh out of university to even attempt that tired out bullshit. Meme insinuating that Whites attempt to blame all their problems on browns and niggers, when just the opposite is true, i.e. White guilt, and nigger worship. Gotcha...

What else do you have that whites supposedly gave to the world, without other influences?
Let's see. Civilization, laws, art, culture, philosophy, and common decency, to name just a few. Let's look at what America was in the 1950's, shall we? Recently finished with the latest jewish war of aggression, and prospering as never before. Peace, prosperity and plenty for all...Whites. The number one super power in the world. No niggers in our schools, no jews in our media, and no mexicans flooding our borders. No welfare niggers. No glorified yard ape sports figures. No carjackings, rape, murder, and miscegenation. Why? Segregation, and expatriation. Let's look at this fucked up shithole known as the kwa as it is today...On second thought, I'd rather not...Thanks jews.

So, psycho, as I prepare my sources, I must ask, do YOU have any sources for this "information" or is the fact that you quoted SOMEbody supposed to suffice? Why do we tolerate this jewish bullshit in our White homelands? What is it with yids constantly demanding written proof of self-evident truth? "You eeeevilll Nazis holohoaxed millions of jews, now, prove you didn't." What a load.

You didn't really answer the question.
ARE you prepared to cite sources for your information?
Is anyone else seeing a pattern here?


I could go on all day, but I think you get the idea. If you are new here, read the jews' comments again. This is what they laughingly call debating. Remeber what AH said about the slippery, slimy nature of the jelly like jew, before attempting any "debate" with them. Remember these tactics, as these are basic jew strategies towards "winning" an argument. There are many more, but these should suffice for now.

Wonder if the jews will be this much fun, just before they are tried for treason, crimes against humanity, war-crimes, and sumarilly hung from the nation's lamp posts?

I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

88

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 03:13 PM
Who are you talking to? Why bother quoting people, if you arne't even going to say who you're quoting?

Wonder if the jews will be this much fun, just before they are tried for treason, crimes against humanity, war-crimes, and sumarilly hung from the nation's lamp posts?

I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

88

Yeah... sure... bring it on, big man. Anytime you're ready. Oh, but you probably need another decade or so to keep talking shit with all your cyber-nazi buddies, right? Sure... whenever you can spare the time, we'll be here.

"We gonna chase those crazy.. Chase those crazy baldheads out of our town"
Robert Marley

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 03:42 PM
Who are you talking to? Why bother quoting people, if you arne't even going to say who you're quoting?
Now jew switches tactics, and decides to play dumb with me. I guess I'll have to rely on some good old jewish dumbing down, so that our jewish rat here can understand.
Who do you think I'm posting to, jew? Do I really need to tag you jews for each individual quote you make? I bet you'd like me to busy myself with that, wouldn't you, jew? :rolleyes:

Yeah... sure... bring it on, big man. Anytime you're ready. Oh, but you probably need another decade or so to keep talking shit with all your cyber-nazi buddies, right? Sure... whenever you can spare the time, we'll be here.
This is the best response you can produce, jew? Typical. Since you didn't even try to refute my previous post in any way, I'll take it that you agree that your jewish method of debating is pure 100 percent bullshit, pumped between your ears by a plethora of kike, and kike-alike university "professors". Your responses certainly read like they're coming out of a textbook, anyway.
If you really think jews have another decade or so among White people in the kwa, then you prove what a deluded, shit-for-brains kike you really are.
You may have many White people eating up your jewish lies for now, but at the same time many of these lemmings are being "touched" by multiculturalism, and you know the old saying: "Once you've been attacked by blacks, you can never go back."
Now if we do some really simple math, we can see that in a decade or so there will be far more victims of nigger savagery, and jewish tyranny then there will be gullible goyim to swallow your jewish load.
Whites- 60 percent of the population, jews- less than 2 percent.
Follow that to its logical conclusion, kike. You'll be waiting huh? I'd say you'll be exiting this place fast as your little rat feet can carry you. Don't worry though, if you can get the rabbi's little penis far enough down your throat, it may just let you accompany it to It'z-a-lie...NOT.:rofl:rofl:rofl
I just love when puny kikes and kike alike weaklings try to act tough, as they whistle past the graveyard. Your time is pretty much up, jew. The whole world knows what you really are now, thanks to that jewish invention known as the internet...
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

88

banjo_billy
February 19th, 2008, 03:50 PM
Who are you talking to? Why bother quoting people, if you arne't even going to say who you're quoting?

Yeah... sure... bring it on, big man. Anytime you're ready. Oh, but you probably need another decade or so to keep talking shit with all your cyber-nazi buddies, right? Sure... whenever you can spare the time, we'll be here.

"We gonna chase those crazy.. Chase those crazy baldheads out of our town"
Robert Marley

Is it even beginning to dawn upon that demented little mind of yours that no Jew can ever win an unrigged debate with an Aryan?

Even Mr. A. Black, who claims to be just that, sees through your bullshit and kicks your lying ass. TRUTH is a mighty sword and whether it is wielded by a white man or a black man, it will cut the Jews to ribbons. Even Zev (the self-proclaimed repentant and questioning Jew) isn't fooled by the Jewish shit that is sucking you into the Pit.

Even though you are only a fake Jew, who has decided that kissing the Jewish butt was your sure way to wealth and security (and free bagels), you can't cope with the arguments that you face here. And why? Because we speak the Truth and what you have mistakenly taken as your "guiding light" is nothing more than the gleam of fires through the smoke and mirrors of demonic Jewish fantasies.

Repent and be saved! Continue with your foolishness and you will surely burn in hell along with all of your Jewish demon-buddies.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 03:59 PM
I suppose delusions of self-importance and eloquence just come with the turf, eh?

No, rabbit any intelligent viewer can see what I do.. that you lack the ability to form a coherent thought without small-minded racial slurs. Thus, you don't NEED ME to make you look like a fool. You're doing just fine all by yourself.

Jews are in fact some of the toughest fighters out there, as well as having the most effective and widespread intelligence network, and making the finest weapons in the world. Britiain knew it, that's why they signed the Balfour Declaration, in exchange for the weapons that would let the Brits fight in the trenches without mud gumming up the cartridges. (And you all dare to call BLACKS stupid?)

They fought and won their own independence, with no help from ANYone in the world, except a few smallarms from little ol Czechoslovakia. And they've defended their homeland against an attempted invasion by more foreign soldiers outside the borders than men, women and children inside.... All this back in the days when almost ALL the soldiers had to hitchhike to the front lines.

Jews were fighting in Warsaw, after all the guns had been taken away. They were still running across rooftops, secured by ropes, throwing Molitov cocktails at those nazi scum.

You REALLY think you're going to get anywhere NEAR a majority of whites on your side? What about all the multicultural liberals? What about the conservative Christian zionists? If liberals and conservatives, aren't with you, exactly which whites ARE going to be in your "army" ?

Yeah, I'll say it again. Bring it on, big man. You're all talk. Just like how it's always the littlest dogs that feel the need to bark the loudest... Overcompensating, because they know they have no bite.

Oh, and Billy boy, I'm still waiting on ANYone to dare get into a biblical debate with me. If you think you've got what it takes, start a thread.

Troy Alexander
February 19th, 2008, 04:04 PM
Yeah, I'll say it again. Bring it on

You may desperately want to fight for the Jews, but what makes you think they will accept you. Probably there is a jew reading this right now thinking what a stupid nigger you are.

Karen Z.
February 19th, 2008, 04:36 PM
I think we were all taught at some point, yahu, that if you ally yourself with the devil he will betray you.

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 04:39 PM
No, rabbit any intelligent viewer can see what I do..
Parrot jewish lies like a true jewish piece of shit?

that you lack the ability to form a coherent thought without small-minded racial slurs.Small minded racial slurs huh? You mean inescapable, self-evident truths that jew desperately wants hidden and buried under jewy terms like "small minded racial slurs"? You got your jewspeak down to a science, I'll say that much for you.

Jews are in fact some of the toughest fighters out there, as well as having the most effective and widespread intelligence network, and making the finest weapons in the world. Yep, it takes some real bad-ass mother fuckers to shoot down unarmed Palestinian women and children in the streets, because they used "small minded racial slurs" pertaining to the jewish problem, the allies illegally installed in their midst, some sixty years plus ago... If by the best manufactured weapons, you mean American made, then I have to agree with you there. Our taxes have funded you murderous jews long enough now.

They fought and won their own independence, with no help from ANYone in the world, except a few smallarms from little ol Czechoslovakia. And they've defended their homeland against an attempted invasion by more foreign soldiers outside the borders than men, women and children inside.... All this back in the days when almost ALL the soldiers had to hitchhike to the front lines.
Did they have to hitchhike uphill both ways, through ten feet of snow? Did they have to eat dirt? Were they thankful to get that dirt? How very noble of these poor poor poy-seh-cuted kikes.

Jews were fighting in Warsaw, after all the guns had been taken away. They were still running across rooftops, secured by ropes, throwing Molitov cocktails at those nazi scum.
Whoopsie, your true colors (hypocritical jewish hatred) are showing there, kike. :eek:

You REALLY think you're going to get anywhere NEAR a majority of whites on your side? Believe me jew, they already are. Look around you. Nooses here, swazis there. Nappy headed ho's and niggers upside down with a fork stuck in their ass. You think these things are just a passing phase? You think this will all just blow over? Apparently your beloved jews don't. They viciously persecute these expressions of free speech as hate crimes. Why? If there was no validity to these things, why would the jew fear them so much?
Most Whites hate jews, niggers, and other mystery meat, but are too afraid to ever admit it. White flight will easily prove this. Niggers move in, humans move out. Why?
The jew has so co-opted our legal and societal system that the consequenses of being called "racist" and having one's life systematically destroyed by jewy political cowardice, far outweigh their ability to speak up for themselves. That is until they are beaten, raped robbed or have their children raped, robbed and murdered by niggers, swindled by jews and displaced by turd-world scum. Each and every time jewish actions and behavior cause anti-semitism, it means one more pissed off White person, looking for answers. That means one more White person interested in the truth about all your Big Lies. So yeah, with a majority pissed off White population, I am confident we will treat you quite correctly during the oncoming biggest pogrom in the history of the jew. Forget about comfy slave labor camps (the true fate of kikes in Nazi Germany, btw), with swimming pools, theaters and infirmaries (an infirmary in a "death camp???). This time no gas chambers (which was not only physically impossible, especially at that time, but would have been way more expensive than just simply lining you kikes up and gunning you down, and therefore the Nazis would never have wasted their time) will be used. Not even inexpensive ammo, just a rope, a tree and your necks.

Yeah, I'll say it again. Bring it on, big man. You're all talk. Just like how it's always the littlest dogs that feel the need to bark the loudest... Overcompensating, because they know they have no bite.
Just keep on whistling jew boy. It won't spare you from the wrath of the progeny of the millions of Whites you have swindled, cheated, and genocided.

Oh, and Billy boy, I'm still waiting on ANYone to dare get into a biblical debate with me. If you think you've got what it takes, start a thread.I've got a book to "debate". It's a wonderful book pretty much identical to the bible except it's a bit more believable. It's all about the adventures of these three little pigs, and a big bad wolf...:[]

88

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 04:56 PM
More Greek-influenced drivel.

You don't need us to corrupt or water down your movement. Your European roots in philosophy do it for you.

We can argue all day about whether the effects of Jewish actions are good or bad, but the fact remains, something gets done.

Hebrew is not a language well suited for abstract ideas, or philosophical constructs. It is an action oriented language. There are no linking verbs. If it doesn't express an action, it's not a verb. Hell, even NOUNS are nouns expressing action.

Melekh David = King David OR David reigned

What's YOUR verb, Rabbit? I still see nothing but "talk."

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 05:40 PM
More Greek-influenced drivel.

Because as everyone knows, the Greeks never produced anything but "drivel" :rolleyes:

You don't need us to corrupt or water down your movement. Your European roots in philosophy do it for you.

I'm sorry but even my kikenbabble translator had a hard time with that spew.
What is it you are trying to say jew?

We can argue all day about whether the effects of Jewish actions are good or bad, but the fact remains, something gets done.
There is no argument about wheather jewscum meddling is "good" or "bad", you greasy snake. If it's good for jews, it's bad for Whites. Period.
I'll say something gets done alright. Palestinian women and children "get done", White tax money "gets done" and our sense of heritage and culture "gets done". I'd say you filthy-rat-jew scumbags have "done" plenty.


Hebrew is not a language well suited for abstract ideas, or philosophical constructs. But it is a perfect language for lying, pissing and moaning and kvetching though, oy vey...:[]

. It is an action oriented language. Actions like genocide, usury, apartheid, and name calling.

What's YOUR verb, Rabbit? I still see nothing but "talk."
"White Pride" would be my particualr "verb", according to your fucked up phlegm choked "language". No surprise that the rules of the heeb "language" are just as slippery and fucked up as the heeb's "rules" of conduct.

Oh and BTW genius, if you see nothing but talk, then you have just figured out what a discussion forum is for, you idiotic assclown. I'm not here to activate. I'm here to tell on jews and jew wannabes like you. Nice try.:rolleyes:

Don't you have a fresh circumcision wound to suck on or something? You waste your time trying to bullshit me here jew. Your feeble deceptive skills are no match for the power of the TRUTH. "You are of your father the devil and his works will you do..."
The invisible man in the sky supposedly once said that to your ancestors, right after he kicked them out of a temple for quite jewily turning a profit there, and I have to admit it's the one thing I can actually believe, when it comes to the holey babble.
Even Jeeboo hates you demonic scum.


:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

88

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 05:51 PM
"White Pride" would be my particualr "verb", according to your fucked up phlegm choked "language".

So you also blame DA J005 for the fact that you can't tell a verb from a noun? Gotcha.

Pale Horse
February 19th, 2008, 05:52 PM
So you also blame DA J005 for the fact that you can't tell a verb from a noun? Gotcha.
It's an Aryan thing,your heeb mind would never comprehend it...

Karen Z.
February 19th, 2008, 05:56 PM
Don't you have a fresh circumcision wound to suck on or something? You waste your time trying to bullshit me here jew. Your feeble deceptive skills are no match for the power of the TRUTH. "You are of your father the devil and his works will you do..."

DOUBLE SCORCH! lulz

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 06:14 PM
So you also blame DA J005 for the fact that you can't tell a verb from a noun? Gotcha.

What the fuck is wrong with you you thick fucking twat??? I mean besides being a stupid fucking kike? Didn't I just explain that it is the jewish gibberish that is fucked up? Are you really so stupid as to even try that with me? Jeboo on a fucking crutch...

Hebrew is not a language well suited for abstract ideas, or philosophical constructs. It is an action oriented language. There are no linking verbs. If it doesn't express an action, it's not a verb. Hell, even NOUNS are nouns expressing action.

These are your words idiot. I was expounding on the fact that your fucked up gutteral mess of a language deigns my noun to a verb. :[]

jew, noun- A vile piece of shit, demonspawn race, not fit for breathing oxygen.
jew, verb- To unscrupulously swindle or cheat someone, like a jew would.

Is that enough of a differnece you purile piece of prepubescent pigshit?

Your circumcision wound is getting cold, btw...

88

Dietrich
February 19th, 2008, 06:19 PM
"We gonna chase those crazy.. Chase those crazy baldheads out of our town"
Robert Marley

http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/images/2007/08/20/q1x00176_9.jpg

It worked mon!

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 06:25 PM
These are your words idiot. I was expounding on the fact that your fucked up gutteral mess of a language deigns my noun to a verb. :[]

Oh, is THAT what you meant? No, Hebrew is not concerned with what happens in other languages. They are all earthly languages, after all, and so their corruption is of little consequence. Hebrew must be preserved and understood, specifically and solely because it is the language in which mankind was given the Word of G-d, and to allow IT to become corrupted is to allow G-d's Word to become corrupted... as we see in countless English translations.


Your circumcision wound is getting cold, btw...

88

Oh, don't worry your little head about that. It isn't now, but if it gets cold, I'll just call your mom!

Dietrich-

That's super. Now why don't you show us the USA Today article you got that from? Something tells me you're not being forthright concerning the situation depicted in your photo here.

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 06:37 PM
Oh, don't worry your little head about that. It isn't now, but if it gets cold, I'll just call your mom!


Well, you win jew. How can I compete with such a rapier like wit?
Now, let's get off moms. I just got off yours....


I know I know, I should just ignore this fucking piece of jewscum, but damn it's funny when it gets its ass kicked by the fucking truth, and this is all it can come up with...

Yo' momma jokes, straight from the niggerish mentality of the vile, disgusting, parasitic jew.

Do better kike, you're making the rest of the tribe look bad. (And that's saying a lot!)

88

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 06:43 PM
I love it. I'm getting a lecture in maturity from someone who brought my genitalia into the discussion.

RabbitNoMore
February 19th, 2008, 07:03 PM
I love it. I'm getting a lecture in maturity from someone who brought my genitalia into the discussion.
You really are too fucking stupid dood.

Read it again asswipe:

Don't you have a fresh circumcision wound to suck on or something?
Your circumcision wound is getting cold, btw...

What kind of self-obsessed, retarded kike would use my mention of its disgusting habit of mutillating White baby boys' genitals and sucking on the bloody wound, as an opportunity to mention its own genitals? And I thought niggers had muh dik mentalities...:rolleyes:

Give it up fucktard, you can't spin my words for shit, and you need to quit trying, you're only embarassing yourself now.

88

banjo_billy
February 19th, 2008, 07:11 PM
More Greek-influenced drivel.

You don't need us to corrupt or water down your movement. Your European roots in philosophy do it for you.

We can argue all day about whether the effects of Jewish actions are good or bad, but the fact remains, something gets done.

Hebrew is not a language well suited for abstract ideas, or philosophical constructs. It is an action oriented language. There are no linking verbs. If it doesn't express an action, it's not a verb. Hell, even NOUNS are nouns expressing action.

Melekh David = King David OR David reigned

What's YOUR verb, Rabbit? I still see nothing but "talk."

Ma's-tit-Yahoo,

"Hebrew" is derived from the Aramaic word "Apiru" meaning "thief, cut-throat, bandit". So, of course, the language of the old bandits who roamed the hills of Philestia (modern Palestine), were not too good at abstract thought or philosophical ideas. Their language reflected the low-brow interests of a people who thrived on banditry and goat rustling. And their primative alphabet did not support deep thinking because it did not contain any vowels, and so left a lot up to the imagination of the reader who was free to make up whatever seemed right when he couldn't understand what was written.

And of course, such a primitive people would only need the bare rudiments of thought expressed in their primative language. These semites, believing that deceit is a better method of mentation than rationality and philosophical dialog, have only to "prove" that stealing is better than working, to show each other the "virtures" of their ways.

It is obvious that you have embraced the Jewish methods of deceit so thoroughly that you have very little ability to hold your own in any of the above converstations. Obviously, the Jews have trained you in blind acceptance of the Jewish dogma. Your distain for the "More Greek-influenced drivel", as you call actual thinking, has a very old Jewish tradition among the rabbis who were totally panic-striken that their Jewish followers would be able to see through the rabbi-scam by actually using their minds to figure things out for themselves. So, they fabricated such fairy-tales about super-kikes like Daniel in the Lions Den, to bolster their positions among the superstitious and ignorant Jews.

Your post here, shows your blind ignorance and utter lack of knowledge of anything more than the lies of the rabbis. For example, King David was a myth devised by the rabbis. Even though Palestine and the entire Middle East has been thoroughly bulldozed and rototilled looking for archeological data, not a shred of evidence has ever been found that indicates that such a "mighty king" actually ever existed, not a potsherd, not an inscription, not a temple, or garrison or written data of any kind has been found and even more telling, nothing has been found in any of the letters of the kings of the surrounding territories about such a king. The same goes for King Solomon, another rabbinical myth of the scribes.

And so, dumb shit, you have done it again ... proven that you are a worthy Jew, full of idiocy, lies and bullstuff, repeating the crap that the lying rabbis taught you. Oh, how cute, you know some Apiru. "Melekh David = King David OR David reigned." But the lies are still there, foolish one. Saying something in Apiru, does not mean that what you say is true. But of what use is truth to a bandit?

The Jews have developed the ability of not just telling one lie at a time since one lie is easily refuted. But you seem to have picked up their method of tossing out lots of lies all at once, making it more difficult to be refuted. It's amazing to me, really, to actually witness the teachings of Jesus in action ... here is a fool that the rabbis are leading off into hell and making him even more corrupt than they.

Matityahu
February 19th, 2008, 07:19 PM
Ma's-tit-Yahoo,

"Hebrew" is derived from the word "Apiru"

Is that what your nazi buddies say? No, "Hebrew" is the Anglicization. The actual word is "Ivrit" which bears even less resemblance to "apiru"

Even though Palestine and the entire Middle East has been thoroughly bulldozed and rototilled looking for archeological data

You're a freakin genius, ya idiot.

None of the three major religions in the middle east would allow "Palestine and the entire middle east" to be "thoroughly bulldozed."

Check a real history book out sometime. Hell, even THAT wouldn't be necessary.. if you knew how to put yourself in anyone else's shoes, you could clearly see how none of them want the buildings and ruins in existence TODAY to be destroyed, or even put at risk, to find what MIGHT have been in the past.

banjo_billy
February 19th, 2008, 07:33 PM
Is that what your nazi buddies say? No, "Hebrew" is the Anglicization. The actual word is "Ivrit" which bears even less reference to "apiru".
No, that is what the Jewish archeologists and philologists say. Try reading a book of the archeology of the Middle East someday.

Is

You're a freakin genius, ya idiot.

None of the three major religions in the middle east would allow "Palestine and the entire middle east" to be "thoroughly bulldozed."

Check a real history book out sometime. Hell, even THAT wouldn't be necessary.. if you knew how to put yourself in anyone else's shoes, you could clearly see how none of them want the buildings and ruins in existence TODAY to be destroyed, or even put at risk, to find what MIGHT have been in the past.

Perhaps your knowledge even of English is vestigial at best. Perhaps I should re-phrase a few words that were too difficult for you to grasp. Substitute "thoroughly bulldozed" with the words "carefully sifted".

Now is that better, Oh, Hell-bound Helion?

Prince_Vivid
February 20th, 2008, 12:20 AM
For some reason you are able to receive my emails, but I am not receiving yours. My PM here is active, others have contacted me by way of it.

My apologies. For some reason only the first three letters of your last name had shown up which looked weird so...Yeah.

Horseman
February 22nd, 2008, 07:38 PM
Lets say the race war happens and the White Power groups win. You know what happens next? They start fighting amongst themselves, it's inevitable. Because a nation founded through force, pressing their will and ideology on another has to keep that going. It's like a drug, and it's what starts to rot groups like this at the core.

You can't build on hate, just like you can't wind up with someone you cheated with.


I am not CONSUMED by the hate you claim is the basis for my opinions. I merely see the truth and want to see it changed. If I was consumed by hate then I'd be a pretty miserable person. and then the enemy would have achieved what they want over me, wouldnt they?

psychologicalshock
February 23rd, 2008, 02:43 AM
Isn't it about time Liberal "Scientist" smuts make up some Hate Dynamics? I mean how are you going to explain how someone can be consumed by hate? Does that mean that Hate is Endothermic? Is the person suffering? How many people are consumed in this fictional particle? This specific particle , which like the famous dark matter or ectoplasm has to be there out of necessity of how the Universe works. By the way did I mention that the Universe used to be a big piece of land floating on infinite water or maybe it was the same land sitting on the backs of 3 big whales? Anyhow, we really need to figure this Hate Particle out according to our theoretical model and if it is sufficiently proven by photographic and hearsay witness evidence we can safely say that hate is contagious and everyone with it must be killed. Also, everyone who has been witnessed as hateful must be killed too because hate cannot be detected and thus anyone who might have it must be killed.

Horseman
February 23rd, 2008, 03:34 PM
According to Kenneth S. Stern of the American Jewish Committee, "An academic program is desperately needed to study why hatred has been a common human experience....What you create at Gonzaga can be a model for the nation."


Further reading
The Need for an Interdisciplinary Field of Hate Studies by Kenneth S. Stern

The Social Psychology of Hatred by Evan R. Harrington

Positioning Hate by Kathleen Blee

Teaching a General Education Course on Hate Crimes: Challenges and Solutions by Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld

The Genetic/Evolutionary Basis of Prejudice and Hatred by Harold D. Fishbein

Our Ancestral Shadow: Hate and Human Nature in Evolutionary Psychology by James E. Waller

banjo_billy
February 23rd, 2008, 06:22 PM
According to Kenneth S. Stern of the American Jewish Committee, "An academic program is desperately needed to study why hatred has been a common human experience....What you create at Gonzaga can be a model for the nation."

Hate is good and natural. What is unnatural are the lying, hypocritical, hate-filled Jews pretending that everyone except themselves has hate within them.

Hate is good because it is the emotion that protects us from our enemies. So, this is why the Jews want to make it a crime to "hate" because they don't want us to be safe from our enemies. The Jews want us to love being destroyed.

And so, we must all smile and laugh and feel love and have fun as we enjoy strangling our enemies, the Jews. Strangle the Jews and love doing it, otherwise it will be a crime. :)

tuisto
February 23rd, 2008, 06:49 PM
Isn't it about time Liberal "Scientist" smuts make up some Hate Dynamics? I mean how are you going to explain how someone can be consumed by hate? Does that mean that Hate is Endothermic? Is the person suffering? How many people are consumed in this fictional particle? This specific particle , which like the famous dark matter or ectoplasm has to be there out of necessity of how the Universe works. By the way did I mention that the Universe used to be a big piece of land floating on infinite water or maybe it was the same land sitting on the backs of 3 big whales? Anyhow, we really need to figure this Hate Particle out according to our theoretical model and if it is sufficiently proven by photographic and hearsay witness evidence we can safely say that hate is contagious and everyone with it must be killed. Also, everyone who has been witnessed as hateful must be killed too because hate cannot be detected and thus anyone who might have it must be killed.

Comrade, how I wish you'd elaborate on the black hole/hate connection
on top of your purposefull intention, to show the holes of the trinitarian
Xtian argument of the creation of the universe by three giant whales, who are nothing but one whale in three.

A jew accusing a non jew of "hate" is like a black hole blaming the sun
for the black hole's misery to be unable to spread light. :)

Horseman
February 23rd, 2008, 10:04 PM
Hate is good and natural. What is unnatural are the lying, hypocritical, hate-filled Jews pretending that everyone except themselves has hate within them.

Hate is good because it is the emotion that protects us from our enemies. So, this is why the Jews want to make it a crime to "hate" because they don't want us to be safe from our enemies. The Jews want us to love being destroyed.

And so, we must all smile and laugh and feel love and have fun as we enjoy strangling our enemies, the Jews. Strangle the Jews and love doing it, otherwise it will be a crime. :)

They want us to be this way, and unbelievably they have succeeded to a large degree. A people who willingly stop defending themselves, and welcome their enemy to come destroy them. Is there anything so fucked up as this in human history?