Log in

View Full Version : UN expert calls Palestinian terrorism 'inevitable consequence' of Israeli occupation


Starr
February 28th, 2008, 10:35 PM
I only found a reference to this after coming across an ADL article, where they were, of course, OUTRAGED. I wanted to post it here to get comments from the opposition folks. I would say that his basic idea is just stating an obvious:

GENEVA: A report commissioned by the United Nations suggests that Palestinian terrorism is the "inevitable consequence" of Israeli occupation and laws that resemble South African apartheid — a claim Israel rejected Tuesday as enflaming hatred between Jews and Palestinians.

The report by John Dugard, independent investigator on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for the U.N. Human Rights Council, will be presented next month, but it has been posted on the body's Web site.

In it, Dugard, a South African lawyer who campaigned against apartheid in the 1980s, says "common sense ... dictates that a distinction must be drawn between acts of mindless terror, such as acts committed by al-Qaida, and acts committed in the course of a war of national liberation against colonialism, apartheid or military occupation."

While Palestinian terrorist acts are to be deplored, "they must be understood as being a painful but inevitable consequence of colonialism, apartheid or occupation," writes Dugard, whose 25-page report accuses the Jewish state of acts and policies consistent with all three.

He cited checkpoints and roadblocks restricting Palestinian movement to house demolitions and what he terms the "Judaization" of Jerusalem.


"Acts of terror against military occupation must be seen in historical context," Dugard says. "This is why every effort should be made to bring the occupation to a speedy end. Until this is done, peace cannot be expected, and violence will continue."

Israel's U.N. ambassador in Geneva slammed Dugard's analysis.

"The common link between al-Qaida and the Palestinian terrorists is that both intentionally target civilians with the mere purpose to kill," Itzhak Levanon said. "The fact that Professor Dugard is ignoring this essential fact, demonstrates his inability to use objectivity in his assessment.

"Professor Dugard will better serve the cause of peace by ceasing to enflame the hatred between Israelis and Palestinians, who have embarked on serious talks to solve this contentious situation."

Dugard was appointed in 2001 as an unpaid expert by the now-defunct U.N. Human Rights Commission to investigate only violations by the Israeli side, prompting Israel and the U.S. to dismiss his reports as one-sided. Israel refused to allow him to conduct a U.N.-mandated fact-finding mission on its Gaza offensive in 2006.

The report will be presented next month at the 47-nation rights council's first regular session of the year. The new body has been widely criticized — even by its founder, former U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan — for spending most of its time criticizing one government, Israel's, over alleged abuses.

The ADL's outrage:
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/UnitedNations_94/5239_94.htm

I also found this book was promoted by them, at one time, on their website:
http://www.adl.org/bibliography/featured_book5.asp

2004 marks the beginning of the two-year bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark expedition. While this anniversary represents a landmark event in U.S. history, it also signifies the start of a century of resettlement and violence against Native Americans. The Anti-Defamation League encourages educators to include Native American perspectives in their discussions about Lewis and Clark, and to teach about the history and contemporary lives of indigenous peoples. October and November are times when schools traditionally teach about Native culture through observances including Native American Awareness Month (October), Indigenous People’s Day (Oct. 11), Dia de la Raza (Oct. 12), and Thanksgiving (Nov. 25). A great way to pay tribute during these months and throughout the school year is to read This Land is My Land.

No double standards, there.

faceless
March 2nd, 2008, 01:14 PM
No double standards, there.

Off course there are no double standards here. Those are two very different issues.

Starr
March 2nd, 2008, 03:15 PM
Very different, how so?

faceless
March 4th, 2008, 05:52 PM
Very different, how so?

You mean , the Arabs and the Indians?
Jews made Arab population in Israel to Increase while the Americans almost exterminate the Indian population to nothing.
That is one differences out of many.