Cases of unusual cruelty.
By Moses Robinovich

Many years have passed since the horrid discovery of camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka and of course Dachau. The photos, the evidence (from such scholarly Jews as Jankiel Wiernik) , the damning Trials and of course the hunt for these terrible monsters are all fresh in the minds of Jews everywhere. We have also heard of the use of crude, but effective devices such as Soviet Tank Engines , Soviet Submarine engines and multiple holes in the ceiling for the administration of HCN gas, but in all these years one secret has been hidden away from us : the use of "Funny Gas" .

Initially, the German murderers attempted to import feces for these ends , unfortunately, this was soon a non-viable option as the numerous partisans hiding in the winding passages made it very difficult to collect the required materials. Soon, the cruel Germans found a better way to do it - it was achieved through the creation of a toilet that could suction gas right out of a person.

"It wos terrible, I moiself attempted to avoid the use of these eviiiil deevices!" exclaims my guest Shlomo Levitz "They would begin to suction your posterior until all the gasses had left. It was very moch like sittin on a large vacuum. I still have to clean moi house on my knees because I am so afraid of vacuums!"

Another one of my guests describes what would happen if one was caught attempting to defecate anywhere other than in these toilets. "They would hang us by our nut sacks and then bend us back like bows so we'd have to defecate on our own heads. It was horrible. I to this day cannot go to the toilet without reliving those horrible memories, oy vei. I have to have moi grand son Moshe lick it out instead."

The gas that was "sucked out" turned out to be methane gas (CH4) which was called funny gas until last year when it was declared a hate term. Today the mention of CH4 is a crime in Germany and all textbooks have permanently removed it. In fact, all compounds that might yield methane gas have also been labeled as non-reactable. "Funny gas" as it was called a few years back can usually be found at the posterior of cows, bathrooms and even on clothes. It is characterized by Professor Gould as "having a funny, yet interesting smell" that also "tickles the olfactory bulb." Professor Gould has also attested to his parents being survivors of this inhumane treatment and he had it simulated on himself to be at peace with these terrible memories.

The Germans, however; called CH4 "Surprise Gas" and for a good reason. Typically the Jews were beguiled into thinking they were at a work camp right after they walked past the burial barrows and the gas storage. At this point the Jews were lax and thus they would be convinced that the gas chambers were actually their bedrooms and the gas grate was a microphone. They would typically get a haircut by a giggling hair stylist who knew what would happen a bit later. They would then be led to the large bathroom complex where there the Nazis would determine the gas worthiness of a prisoner. The prisoners who would expel gas multiple times before finally finishing their seance would then be considered "candidates" for keeping. "Thei shoved a barometer in me butthole right after I had a good shit." says Shalom Crawford. "Those who made a lot of solid produce typically had to clean up the mess , usually orally" says a formal researcher who remained anonymous. The candidates who passed the test would then be kept for the production of more gas, "usually they would be fed beans, sometimes in such quantities that they would die of dehydration after emptying themselves. The Nazis considered these the most useful Jews" Those who did not pass this test were led into the gassing gas chambers which were positioned in a random grid so that the Jewish survivors would have a hard time figuring out if they were going to die or not. "It made me vewy worried. They'd gas a random chamber each night so I never knew if I was going to live or not!" says Levitz.

A minute past midnight the poor souls doomed to execution would be suddenly gassed by the "Funny Gas". Here it becomes obvious why it was called "Surprise Gas" by the Germans. The Germans would typically begin giggling like little girls behind the door so the Jews would wake up only to find that they were suffocating. "They were literally gassed with their own fart" declares the anonymous researcher.

The giggling has been questioned for years until it was finally researched by a professional psychanalytic.
"The reasons they liked to giggle so much is because they were secretly homosexuals who couldn't come to terms with being homosexuals." says Sigmund Groid. Groid devoted his postdoctoral to an infamous, but not very well known Nazi who worked in one of these natural gas installations. His name was Heinrich "Giggleteeth" , his real name; however, remains a mystery . Giggleteeth was a closet homosexual who had made such a name for himself due to the awkward sound he produced through his teeth while giggling. Groid's paper, while well published in the science community caused a lot of concern in the Jewish community. "Giggleteeth just doesn't sound all that great" says rabbi Horiwitz ."It's not particularly threatening and I have many homosexuals sitting in some of my best seats who would surely get o-ffended." The anonymous researcher further clarified "It doesn't snap and it doesn't sell. You have to understand that a rabbi's job is a very delicate balance between being a merchant and being a saint."

With such characters as "Giggleteeth" imprisoned and eventually killed the Jewish community has become somewhat more relaxed. Many are seen revisiting ancient Jewish professions such as begging and slave trading. As for the survivors of this hardship , they are still recuperating, most of them have had their bathrooms remodeled. "I had my dinner table put into my bathroom so that I could have a positive experience while reliving the painful memories" says Haim Leiberman. Other such valiant Jews unfortunately passed away and couldn't tell me their stories, although a few were successfully contacted by their relatives. Charles Sheckle had his deceased grandfather draw the bathrooms for him through the use of Charles' own body. "It wasn't the first time he touched me in souch a way" says Charles.

In conclusion, it turns out that "Funny Gas" was much more ubiquitous than previously thought of and it is time for the World to become aware of this deplorable event . For if we do not learn from the past, how will we construct a healthy, multicultural future?

(YES I WROTE IT)

Copyright 2008 Psychologicalshock . All Rights Reserved.

[QUOTE=psychologicalshock;740084]Cases of unusual cruelty.
By Moses Robinovich


"you must spread some reputation..."

"you must spread some reputation..."

Thanks tuisto. :D

Very well writ holocaust fiction - best you copyright it PS, lest it show up as some old jew's writ memoire, ala "Mischa, the Wolf Girl", and Elie Weasel's "Night"!

Very well writ holocaust fiction - best you copyright it PS, lest it show up as some old jew's writ memoire, ala "Mischa, the Wolf Girl", and Elie Weasel's "Night"!

Thanks EG, it's all fiction though. :D



How does one put a copyright down? I used to just write Copyright (Year) (Name of Org). All Rights Reserved. But I am not sure if that's correct.

Thanks EG, it's all fiction though. :D



How does one put a copyright down? I used to just write Copyright (Year) (Name of Org). All Rights Reserved. But I am not sure if that's correct.

Ahm, let's see, I am pretty sure that's all one has to do.

Also, I am serious, I wouldn't put it past some jew, looking for holocaust reparation dollars to suddenly emerge from his senility and experience a fit of memory; and use your Tale as truth; so an easy and cheap way to copyright is to print out the story you've told here and mail it to yourself.

Put away for safe-keeping the unopened envelope; which in American courts of law counts as copyright because the date on the stamped and delivered envelope would precede any jew's later claims. :)

Ahm, let's see, I am pretty sure that's all one has to do.

Aha, going to do it now.


Also, I am serious, I wouldn't put it past some jew, looking for holocaust reparation dollars to suddenly emerge from his senility and experience a fit of memory; and use your Tale as truth; so an easy and cheap way to copyright is to print out the story you've told here and mail it to yourself.
No doubt, it's a good story no? :rofl


Put away for safe-keeping the unopened envelope; which in American courts of law counts as copyright because the date on the stamped and delivered envelope would precede any jew's later claims. :)
I'll do it but I have a lot of work id have to do that for. Isn't there laws for this on the internet as well?

I'll do it but I have a lot of work id have to do that for. Isn't there laws for this on the internet as well?

Actually, I don't think there are many, if any, laws on that yet; which is why you should add your own copyright distinction. Blogs allow for this, with special copyright characters ect.

However, since you have posted your Tale on an open web site, which archives, then your Tale would have some protection; but, why not just copyright as you have done.

(meh, you are lazy! Print out, buy a stamp, address an envelope and mail it! :p :)]

copyright as you have done.

(meh, you are lazy! Print out, buy a stamp, address an envelope and mail it! :p :)]

You forget my nationality EG.

As for the buying, I can just steal one from my father's office. :D

Oi....ze poisecution... ze poisecution. :rofl

I'll rep you once I can again. :)

This could be converted into a sketch on one of the radio shows, replete with caricatured vocals.

Rabbi T.J.B.-stein sez: Oy vey, zīs voz ze ĥugezt antee-Semeeţizm in oyĝes!! Oy'm zo oyvended, pleeze ĥelp me soy zis ĥoytvoyl rayshitzm vroym Russhya in ha-Emeri'Kva!

LOL! Yeah, good ol' Yankel Weirnik....he's about has "reliable" as our post-911 air travel :rolleyes:

It sounds like an unimaginable scenario, but medical historians are unanimmous that up to one million Jews were the asphyxiated victims of carefully extracted flatulents. Gas release, gas expansion and noxious fumes were studied vigorously by Hitler's private physician Dr. Frank Dachau.

I can't imagine...what it was like... :(

It sounds like an unimaginable scenario, but medical historians are unanimmous that up to one million Jews were the asphyxiated victims of carefully extracted flatulents. Gas release, gas expansion and noxious fumes were studied vigorously by Hitler's private physician Dr. Frank Dachau.
Those EVIL EVIL, Naziiis!


I can't imagine...what it was like... :(
Its vewy tewable moi deer. Moi dear old motha woz burnt in her owen gasses! it woz so tewible I defecated moiself.

I would imagine that dropping a lit match down a pipe on the roof and into a funny-gas-filled room full of jew prisoners would have been a great temptation for me, had I been a prison guard back then.

.

I would imagine that dropping a lit match down a pipe on the roof and into a funny-gas-filled room full of jew prisoners would have been a great temptation for me, had I been a prison guard back then.

.

Oh yez, that iz how they burnt those poor poor innocent Jews after they were done dying!

Those EVIL EVIL, Naziiis!


Its vewy tewable moi deer. Moi dear old motha woz burnt in her owen gasses! it woz so tewible I defecated moiself.

Last night I was awake rather late and got a call, the 'Caust came up; we were discussing Wiernik, the Weasel and the latest fraud/memoire of "Mischa the Wolf Girl" - my Friend, half-serious, suggested that all WN and NS unite; create our own 'Caust tales and then under jewish pseudonyms - sell the collected "memories" to the juden; whom experiencing the Goyim backlash and/or crisis of Faith in Holocaustianity would jump all over the new 'proof'.

Once our Tales are accepted, we each allow ourselves to be exposed as frauds. And, the jews have to again back-pedal even more Tales -

There's a lot wrong with this hypothesis though, since I'm pretty certain that Goyim making up 'Caust tales and convincing juden that they are real is different from juden doing the same thing.

Somehow, jews whom do this are forgiven and not charged with any crime. But, to my thinking, Goyim whom do this would likely be imprisoned, for heresy if nothing else.

Anyways, I tried to, but I cannot provide a hoax tale of my own; I seem to lack the "creative imagination" of the jew. :(

Anyways, I tried to, but I cannot provide a hoax tale of my own; I seem to lack the "creative imagination" of the jew. :(

Well, I have one of my own ready for our collection. I'm not the best writer, but I look forward to taking it into my school's free editing station to see the look on the volunteer's face. That'll solve any of my writing problems.

The title of my story is "The Bison Whisperer", details to come later.

Last night I was awake rather late and got a call, the 'Caust came up; we were discussing Wiernik, the Weasel and the latest fraud/memoire of "Mischa the Wolf Girl" - my Friend, half-serious, suggested that all WN and NS unite; create our own 'Caust tales and then under jewish pseudonyms - sell the collected "memories" to the juden; whom experiencing the Goyim backlash and/or crisis of Faith in Holocaustianity would jump all over the new 'proof'.
Oooo sheckles for psychologicalshock *Rubs hands together mendaciously*


Once our Tales are accepted, we each allow ourselves to be exposed as frauds. And, the jews have to again back-pedal even more Tales -
I think this could actually work pretty well in my country because there would be no backlash in Russia. The Holocaust in general is taken with a large grain of salt there.

There's a lot wrong with this hypothesis though, since I'm pretty certain that Goyim making up 'Caust tales and convincing juden that they are real is different from juden doing the same thing.
It depends on how delicately it is done. We have already seen that the Jew can be led into a political pit by those who are skilled enough to outjew them on that ground.

Somehow, jews whom do this are forgiven and not charged with any crime. But, to my thinking, Goyim whom do this would likely be imprisoned, for heresy if nothing else.
Hopefully I will be deported. :rofl


Anyways, I tried to, but I cannot provide a hoax tale of my own; I seem to lack the "creative imagination" of the jew. :(
= (
That's a shame!

Well, I have one of my own ready for our collection. I'm not the best writer, but I look forward to taking it into my school's free editing station to see the look on the volunteer's face.
Id recommend that you look over your school's policies first. Even wearing a shirt that MIGHT offend "someone" in my school is grounds for expulsion. Some student even got expelled for having White power in his trash can at his dorm. Like I said, be very very careful doing this because these fuckers are draconian on upholding their legend.

That'll solve any of my writing problems.
Well if anything I am usually free for doing edits as I do them quite often nowadays.


The title of my story is "The Bison Whisperer", details to come later.
:D You're free to post it here, I think a general thread for Holocaust stories would be great and the name of the thread is fitting.
It would make Opposing views much more interesting to visit as well.

Id recommend that you look over your school's policies first. Even wearing a shirt that MIGHT offend "someone" in my school is grounds for expulsion. Some student even got expelled for having White power in his trash can at his dorm. Like I said, be very very careful doing this because these fuckers are draconian on upholding their legend.

I'm in a liberal state. For unis in many states the policy is you can promote unless it's obscene but you can't defame or degrade. For example, you can wear a pentagram on your shirt but you can't wear an inverse cross with a stripping nun. Back in California no one got into any trouble for White Power shirts so long as they did not offend other races on them. I thought that was the policy at most schools, but you never know who will complain.

The story about the student sounds...bizarre. I'm thinking some people lodged anonymous complaints against him after it was discovered, embellished or not. That's more often the case.

I'm in a liberal state.
Aren't we all?

For unis in many states the policy is you can promote unless it's obscene but you can't defame or degrade. For example, you can wear a pentagram on your shirt but you can't wear an inverse cross with a stripping nun. Back in California no one got into any trouble for White Power shirts so long as they did not offend other races on them.
I am aware, I lived in a White part of California (Silicone Valley) and I was rather free in doing/saying what I wanted. Generally, the people were in agreement with me.

I thought that was the policy at most schools, but you never know who will complain.
Ive took some time to study these and many students have gotten in trouble from hearsay. The thing is that it's worded in such a way as not to be direct but a large amount of school, perhaps 90% have it worded like Australian law. Yes Holocaust denial isnt illegal but its illegal because it's anti-semitism. It's the same way here - principally you can wear a shirt and you can visit anti-semitic sites on campus however on the other hand these can be held against you in court and the line between "offensive" and "non-offensive" when it comes to White pride is nearly non-existent.

The story about the student sounds...bizarre. I'm thinking some people lodged anonymous complaints against him after it was discovered, embellished or not. That's more often the case.
Actually , he was blackmailed by having other students say it was on his door. There is no proof that it was there but he was expelled.

It's a scary society we live in.

I'm in a liberal state. For unis in many states the policy is you can promote unless it's obscene but you can't defame or degrade. For example, you can wear a pentagram on your shirt but you can't wear an inverse cross with a stripping nun. Back in California no one got into any trouble for White Power shirts so long as they did not offend other races on them. I thought that was the policy at most schools, but you never know who will complain.

The story about the student sounds...bizarre. I'm thinking some people lodged anonymous complaints against him after it was discovered, embellished or not. That's more often the case.

heh, well, in NYC at the Uni I attend, I was near run off campus by the student Hillel Society jews. This was because my Soph. year mid-term paper was about the little spoken of German holocaust of Dresden and it's Folk, as well as the infamous, post war Eisenhower Death Camps for German Folk, the POW camps for men, women and children. I decided that an opposing view was necessary and that, given the "liberal" policies of my Uni, my paper would be challenged; however, I did not expect the backlash - which was carried online as well as off line. There were calls for my scholarship to be rescinded, my deportation back to Ireland; the web site created and dedicated to vilifying my name online was an extreme personal attack -

I threatened the Uni with legal action on that last; the site was taken down quickly; however the other two, more important issues, my scholarship and deportation had to be taken up by my Family attorney.

At first the Dean in charge of my case demanded that I write another, "more appropriate" paper dealing with the "real" and accepted holocaust of juden; when I refused, I was asked to write an apology for having offended jews and "belittling" their holocaust claims by my discussing the German holocaust and ignoring the juden 'Caust. Needless to say, I did not write a new paper, nor did I apologise.

I was able to argue my case successfully; using other ignored holocausts of non-jews. Ie, the Russian jewish inspired holocaust of Russians which far exceeded any jewish claims to their holocaust in terms of the dead; and the facts I had presented and backed up re the holocaust of Germans could not be denied.

Our Family attorney was quite helpful in that; my Uni did not expect a legal action; relying instead on the bullying of jewish Profs and students to make me do their bidding. In the end, it became a non-issue and the Professor's threat to negate my credit for his class did not come to fruition. It also inspired a week long and genuine holocaust discussion; in which I was able to present Revisionist argument. Needless to say, the jews refused to seriously debate me; which is why the debate was cut short after 4 class sessions.

There were calls for my scholarship to be rescinded, my deportation back to Ireland; the web site created and dedicated to vilifying my name online was an extreme personal attack -

I can testify to the above; EG showed me it a while back.

It is worth saying that how she describes it is quite modest but it was one of the most vile attacks I've seen and I've seen a lot of personal attacks in my time.

Yes, you have told me that before EG. Not surprising really.

Many Kwans are aware of how severely Uni's prosecute witches. You'd think that your job is a mercenary assassin with how they treat you. I myself have been threatened with being "revealed" to my University. Pathetic really.

I can testify to the above; EG showed me it a while back.

It is worth saying that how she describes it is quite modest but it was one of the most vile attacks I've seen and I've seen a lot of personal attacks in my time.
It gets worse as time progresses. The more they're allowed to do the more vile their ad hominem attacks. If you think the hate laws of today are ridiculous just wait 10 years and what you see today will seem like freedom.

heh, well, in NYC at the Uni I attend, I was near run off campus by the student Hillel Society jews. This was because my Soph. year mid-term paper was about the little spoken of German holocaust of Dresden and it's Folk, as well as the infamous, post war Eisenhower Death Camps for German Folk, the POW camps for men, women and children. I decided that an opposing view was necessary and that, given the "liberal" policies of my Uni, my paper would be challenged; however, I did not expect the backlash - which was carried online as well as off line. There were calls for my scholarship to be rescinded, my deportation back to Ireland; the web site created and dedicated to vilifying my name online was an extreme personal attack -


Thanks for sharing that. I'm sure you can expand on that story and it would be interesting (once you're finally out of the school).

I am soph. myself. Last year when I was getting my generals done in CA I wrote a paper on Spanish National Syndicalism and received an A from an Irish Catholic professor. Of course, the focus of the paper was whether or not we were using the right methods when writing about history. I am still at least a year away from an independent thesis or anything of the sort. I think about what's going to happen when I get to that point! I go to a small 96% white school and we have no jewish group. In fact, one of our papers on display from former students is on the illigetimacy of Israel. I think it's around five years old.

T.J.B.

A buddy of mine from Russia is studying in the US. The local uni Jews tried to get him deported / expelled because he organized to have a famous European nationalist politician come speak at his campus.

heh, well, in NYC at the Uni I attend, I was near run off campus by the student Hillel Society jews. This was because my Soph. year mid-term paper was about the little spoken of German holocaust of Dresden and it's Folk, as well as the infamous, post war Eisenhower Death Camps for German Folk, the POW camps for men, women and children. I decided that an opposing view was necessary and that, given the "liberal" policies of my Uni, my paper would be challenged; however, I did not expect the backlash - which was carried online as well as off line. There were calls for my scholarship to be rescinded, my deportation back to Ireland; the web site created and dedicated to vilifying my name online was an extreme personal attack -

I threatened the Uni with legal action on that last; the site was taken down quickly; however the other two, more important issues, my scholarship and deportation had to be taken up by my Family attorney.

At first the Dean in charge of my case demanded that I write another, "more appropriate" paper dealing with the "real" and accepted holocaust of juden; when I refused, I was asked to write an apology for having offended jews and "belittling" their holocaust claims by my discussing the German holocaust and ignoring the juden 'Caust. Needless to say, I did not write a new paper, nor did I apologise.

I was able to argue my case successfully; using other ignored holocausts of non-jews. Ie, the Russian jewish inspired holocaust of Russians which far exceeded any jewish claims to their holocaust in terms of the dead; and the facts I had presented and backed up re the holocaust of Germans could not be denied.

Our Family attorney was quite helpful in that; my Uni did not expect a legal action; relying instead on the bullying of jewish Profs and students to make me do their bidding. In the end, it became a non-issue and the Professor's threat to negate my credit for his class did not come to fruition. It also inspired a week long and genuine holocaust discussion; in which I was able to present Revisionist argument. Needless to say, the jews refused to seriously debate me; which is why the debate was cut short after 4 class sessions.

Well, I would have supported you for the right to express your views. Censorship of ideas is wrong, just as prosecution of revisionists is wrong.

Hard to imagine a serious debate though.

Well, I would have supported you for the right to express your views. Censorship of ideas is wrong, just as prosecution of revisionists is wrong.

Hard to imagine a serious debate though.

Yes, its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have shrill Jews shouting you down and calling you bigot/racist/etc. This is what generally passes for debate on the holocaust. We = righteous oppressed Jews. Deniers = evil bigots who should be persecuted/called names/etc

My school has a holohoax studies program. I've attended their sponsored lectures for extra credit in other courses. The people they have speak are the kind of people who sling out the ad hominem and personal attacks against their opponents like crazy (note - the lectures weren't debates, they were just Jews on the pro-Hoax side giving their tales).

Yes, its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have shrill Jews shouting you down and calling you bigot/racist/etc. This is what generally passes for debate on the holocaust. We = righteous oppressed Jews. Deniers = evil bigots who should be persecuted/called names/etc

My school has a holohoax studies program. I've attended their sponsored lectures for extra credit in other courses. The people they have speak are the kind of people who sling out the ad hominem and personal attacks against their opponents like crazy (note - the lectures weren't debates, they were just Jews on the pro-Hoax side giving their tales).

Mind giving a more detailed account Darren? This should be amusing. :)

Mind giving a more detailed account Darren? This should be amusing. :)

Not all that interesting. Last one I went to was with a kike who helped defend Deborah Lipstadt from David Irving's lawsuit. Don't remember his name.

My memory is a bit fuzzy.. it was a couple years ago and I didn't pay a whole lot of attention.. Here is the best of what I can remember:

He went over several topics.. I think he was talking about Ernst Zundel at one point. He knew the audience was probably a little bit shocked that you could be jailed for uttering an opinion in a "free" nation like Canada, so he went on and gave this sort of justification about anti-denial/anti-racism laws essentially saying that since Canada is a democracy, its OK to have laws like that since they must represent the will of the people if Canada is really a democracy. I'm not sure what his involvement, if any, with Ernst Zundel was.

He mentioned something about "Nazi UFO's", I don't really remember what the context of that was about. I think this might have been related to something published by Zundel or Irving.

I do remember him talking about some university professor who is a prominent denier and how he and his fellow Jews have been working over time to try to get him removed/detenured/etc. for speaking out.

He made some snide remarks about the IHR (Institute for Historical Review) calling them the "Institute for Historical Revisionism".

My main beef isn't really these opinion, per se, its the fact that these Jews are always making appeals to emotions, snide comments, and personal attacks in place of proper academic inquiry.

Anyone who even publicly denounces anti-semitism (such as MacDonald) in their investigation of anything that related to the Jews or their pet topics is belittled in this manner. No other set of topics gets this sort of treatment. T.J.B.

Yes, its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have shrill Jews shouting you down and calling you bigot/racist/etc. This is what generally passes for debate on the holocaust. We = righteous oppressed Jews. Deniers = evil bigots who should be persecuted/called names/etc.

Its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have nothing but demands and no evidence to support your contentions. Ever seen a denier in action? Its rather pathetic as we see here every day.

Curious as to what EG's opening line would be ... "show me a gassed Jew" :rofl

Yes, its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have shrill Jews shouting you down and calling you bigot/racist/etc. This is what generally passes for debate on the holocaust. We = righteous oppressed Jews. Deniers = evil bigots who should be persecuted/called names/etc
Carl Jung called this phenomenon archetype which is better known as the virtue or the vice in Platonic thought. Many people think that life is literally these extreme abstracts and Jews inevitably take advantage of these forms which are implanted into the minds of the many. The whole idea has to be so because a debate against reality wouldn't last any longer than the Jews can keep spinning lies. They can do it for a while, of course, but they will be spinning their own doom in a more equal environment.

My school has a holohoax studies program. I've attended their sponsored lectures for extra credit in other courses. The people they have speak are the kind of people who sling out the ad hominem and personal attacks against their opponents like crazy (note - the lectures weren't debates, they were just Jews on the pro-Hoax side giving their tales).

They simply must.

Not all that interesting.
I feel the same way when I hear about these.


He went over several topics.. I think he was talking about Ernst Zundel at one point. He knew the audience was probably a little bit shocked that you could be jailed for uttering an opinion in a "free" nation like Canada, so he went on and gave this sort of justification about anti-denial/anti-racism laws essentially saying that since Canada is a democracy, its OK to have laws like that since they must represent the will of the people if Canada is really a democracy. I'm not sure what his involvement, if any, with Ernst Zundel was.

It amuses me how someone can tell the people what the people want by either draining them of options or coercing them through terror. Then they have the gall to call it democracy and "voice of the people." To a mature person it rings as oppression and enslavement. Amusing really.


He mentioned something about "Nazi UFO's", I don't really remember what the context of that was about. I think this might have been related to something published by Zundel or Irving.
Sounds like a verbal breakdown.


I do remember him talking about some university professor who is a prominent denier and how he and his fellow Jews have been working over time to try to get him removed/detenured/etc. for speaking out.
How surprising.


My main beef isn't really these opinion, per se, its the fact that these Jews are always making appeals to emotions, snide comments, and personal attacks in place of proper academic inquiry.
Darren, this is their normal mode of operation we cannot ever expect anything different from them.

To quote Jung on this matter:
"The Jewish race as a whole -- at least this is my experience -- possesses an unconscious which can be compared with the Aryan only with reserve. Creative individuals apart, the average Jew is far too conscious and differentiated to go about pregnant with the tensions of unborn futures. The Aryan unconscious has a higher potential than the Jewish; that is both the advantage and disadvantage of a youthfulness not yet fully weaned from barbarism. . . . The Aryan unconscious . . . contains explosive forces and seeds of a future yet to be born. . . . The still youthful Germanic peoples are fully capable of creating new cultural forms that still lie dormant in the darkness of the unconscious of every individual -- seeds bursting with energy and capable of mighty expansion. The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own and as far as we can see never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for their development... In my opinion it has been a grave error in medical psychology up till now to apply Jewish categories -- which are not even binding on all Jews -- indiscriminately to Germanic and Slavic Christendom. Because of this most precious secret of the Germanic peoples -- their creative and intuitive depth of soul -- has been explained as a morass of banal infantilism, while my own warning voice has for decades been suspected of anti-Semitism. This suspicion emanated from Freud. He did not understand the Germanic psyche any more than did his Germanic followers. Has the formidable phenomenon of National Socialism, on which the whole world gazes with astonished [awe-struck, admiring] eyes, taught them better? Where was that unparalleled tension and energy while as yet no National Socialism existed? Deep in the German psyche, in a pit that is anything but a garbage-bin of unrealizable infantile wishes and unresolved family resentments. A movement that grips a whole nation must have matured in every individual as well."

Anyone who even publicly denounces anti-semitism (such as MacDonald) in their investigation of anything that related to the Jews or their pet topics is belittled in this manner. No other set of topics gets this sort of treatment.
Hypocrisy is considered quite normal among Jews. As long as they get away with it, it's fine.

Its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have nothing but demands and no evidence to support your contentions. Ever seen a denier in action? Its rather pathetic as we see here every day.

Curious as to what EG's opening line would be ... "show me a gassed Jew" :rofl

Slamin's idea of a debate is where one does not make an inquiry of the other side. Interesting.

Sounds like a typical jewed debate, LOL.

Slamin's idea of a debate is where one does not make an inquiry of the other side. Interesting.

Sounds like a typical jewed debate, LOL.


No, my idea of a debate is one in which both sides has the burden to prove its case - ridicule and howls of disbelief are not sufficient.

Its hard to imagine a serious debate when you have nothing but demands and no evidence to support your contentions.Actually, you jews are the ones making that mighty big claim that it happened and because "it happened", we all need to give you a collective free pass in perpetuity...and, if revisionists were actually allowed to do research, look at forensic evidence and ask questions they would have the necessary "evidence" to support their contentions. They already have quite a bit, even given the fact that they are threated with jail time and sometimes even given jail time merely for suggesting that it be investigated. And, if it really did happen, why does the truth need to be "enforced" with threat of imprisonment and ruin? I don't see anyone going to jail for wanting to research "Atlantis", or even those who say "Atlantis" didn't exist... or called Atlantis deniers. I also don't see anyone in jail or ruined for saying that "slavery" never happened in America. I'm sure there are some who believe that....no one throws them in jail....they have a proper reaction such as laughing, asking them why they believe that and where is their proof, and by showing the person the mountains of real "evidence" that slavery did, indeed, happen. Why, I don't even see anyone yelling at these people and immediately calling them "anti-Negrites".

It is up to YOU to present evidence to prove your claim. And when I say "evidence", I don't mean heresay, eyewitness testimony or confessions extracted as a result of torture. I mean DNA, forensics.....I want all those "pits" dug up and I want to see some actual bodies, or charred remains or crushed remains or whatever little tiny microscopic pieces you all claim they Germans created when they "got rid" of the evidence by digging up and burning and crushing bodies. There will be forensic evidence, just like at a regular crime scene....I have seen no evidence of that at all.

I want so see actual evidence of "real" gas chambers, not just a recreation built by the Soviets AFTER the war.

What are you afraid of?

my idea of a debate is one in which both sides has the burden to prove its case

Fine! Wonderful! But that ain't happenin' because of, SEE ABOVE STATEMENT ABOUT IMPRISONMENT AND RUIN

Your side has not done so in 60 years.

I take it you've seen "1/3 of the Holocaust: Treblinka, Belzac and Sobibor"?

My main beef isn't really these opinion, per se, its the fact that these Jews are always making appeals to emotions, snide comments, and personal attacks in place of proper academic inquiry.

I am not so concerned about these since people who uses emotive arguments, snideness and personal attacks usually lose (badly) in a general contest of views. However what bothers me is the use of legislation to back up a historical event when any historian knows damn well that events that the occurance of events is questioned all the time. You have revisions to events and interpretations as part of the normal academic and/or scholarly process; but when you use legislation to defend a historical event then you know you've got some serious dirty laundry to hide.

What the juden have done is the same as that approach they used to get Brown versus Board of Education through the legislature and then sat back and said 'You can't question it; its law'. They don't really attempt to defend their position very much; this has largely been left up to non-professional historians and amateur historians (like the holocaustcontroversies crowd).

Quite frankly; the 'caust is demolished as a supposed event if one looks at the context to which it makes no sense. But what does make sense is that it was a camp rumour exploited by Allied propagandists and partisans during and after the war. Interestingly; I've just located a book published by the Institue of Jewish Affairs in 1943 declaring that the extermination of juden (by starvation; not by other more direct methods) was a continuation of the starvation policy to exterminate the jews supposed used by the 'Whites' and 'Greens' in the Russian civil war.

I am looking forward to going through it and seeing just how closely the idea tallies with the earlier claims of extermination programs etc that have riddled the Pale since the mid-1880's.

".

It is up to YOU to present evidence to prove your claim. And when I say "evidence", I don't mean heresay, eyewitness testimony or confessions extracted as a result of torture. I mean DNA, forensics.....I want all those "pits" dug up and I want to see some actual bodies, or charred remains or crushed remains or whatever little tiny microscopic pieces you all claim they Germans created when they "got rid" of the evidence by digging up and burning and crushing bodies. There will be forensic evidence, just like at a regular crime scene....I have seen no evidence of that at all.


You do not get to choose the evidence the other side can present. This is the classical revisionit mantra and why you will always fail. All evidence must be considered, not just the evidence you want to see. Confessions and witness statements are always considered evidence. You can try to disqualify it - but you don't get to preach from the soap box.

And I'd sure as hell like you to prove ALL confessions by were extracted by turture.


I want so see actual evidence of "real" gas chambers, not just a recreation built by the Soviets AFTER the war.


And I've posted pictures of the ruins of the crematoriums.


What are you afraid of?


Sure as hell aint you.


I take it you've seen "1/3 of the Holocaust: Treblinka, Belzac and Sobibor"?

Been there, quashed that.

You do not get to choose the evidence the other side can present. This is the classical revisionit mantra and why you will always fail. All evidence must be considered, not just the evidence you want to see. Confessions and witness statements are always considered evidence. You can try to disqualify it - but you don't get to preach from the soap box.

Revisionists quite reasonably asks for forensic proof, genuine evidence, and you respond with pseudo philosophical crap which is a threadbare veil over the dubious witness statements and tortured confessions.

And I'd sure as hell like you to prove ALL confessions by were extracted by turture.

You concede some were?


Been there, quashed that.
Have you bollocks you mattoid.

Ced - I think it would be reasonable to ignore the troll, I have already. As far as it goes it has said nothing new and to expect the Jew to show any forensic proof is laudable - he hasn't in the past 60 years and he wont in the next eternity.

So far I have been liking the contributions to this thread greatly - let's not degenerate it to another dead-end argument. The fact of the matter is that this scum will never answer you directly.

[QUOTE=psychologicalshock;742349]Ced - I think it would be reasonable to ignore the troll, I have already. QUOTE]

Hypocrite

Blockhead...learn to quote.

Ced - I think it would be reasonable to ignore the troll, I have already. QUOTE]

Hypocrite

Didntcha block me some time ago?

As in less than an hour ago?

I don't really see any hypocrisy. If you think that me blocking him but not blocking you is hypocrisy then I guess you feel that you are Slamin's equal? I am happy you feel so, I think. At least you embrace your heritage :D

Ced - I think it would be reasonable to ignore the troll, I have already. As far as it goes it has said nothing new and to expect the Jew to show any forensic proof is laudable - he hasn't in the past 60 years and he wont in the next eternity.

So far I have been liking the contributions to this thread greatly - let's not degenerate it to another dead-end argument. The fact of the matter is that this scum will never answer you directly.

Fuck you - answer you directly, you've lied at every turn and dogged every challenge. :rofl

Just because you do not like the facts does not mean they will change.

You ask for forensic proof while defending KREGE who has published NOTHING!! To call you a fucking hypocrite would be kind - so try posting something you consider evidence of the fraud and I'll address it.

quote=Slamin2;742318]You do not get to choose the evidence the other side can present. This is the classical revisionit [/U]mantra and why you will always fail. All evidence must be considered, not just the evidence you want to see. Confessions and witness statements are always considered evidence.

revisio-nit...a Freudian slip? ::cool:

That has been the case since the invention and of fishy Jesus: "confessions" and "witness statements" are to be considered as "evidence".
Conversion through enforcement of a T.J.B.-GOD.
Age of the fish.

The penetrant smell of the rotten fish leads to the next T.J.B.-GOD:
It's now Holocaust-inanity instead of Christ-inanity.

To not belief the T.J.B. testimonies will qualify you as "sinner" or what's worse: "German" or "N***" or "denier" or "bigot" or "racist" etc.
Used pejoratively with adjectivs from the hence pejorativly imagined enemy
of the T.J.B.-god: "devilish" or "evil" like "evil racist", "evil German", "devilish holo-denier" etc.

T.J.B.- inventions are bad for humans: (H-BOMB!!!)

...Thou shalt not have any other god beside me...

The minds of "witnesses" are steeled against the inanities they utter.

Obviously, "Slamin2"'s arguments are evasive, juvenile and flat out ridiculous. A perfect example of "don't bother trying to teach a pig to sing....it frustrates you and annoys the pig".

He refuses to answer questions aimed at him, yet he screams and kvetches at you to answer his "questions" (which really aren't even questions).

So, I'm outta here (OV, that is) and back to more civilized subforums where humans and White men/women post and have reasonable and LOGICAL discussions.

Bye, Jewey! Don't miss your train....! :rofl

Ced - I think it would be reasonable to ignore the troll, I have already. As far as it goes it has said nothing new and to expect the Jew to show any forensic proof is laudable - he hasn't in the past 60 years and he wont in the next eternity.

So far I have been liking the contributions to this thread greatly - let's not degenerate it to another dead-end argument. The fact of the matter is that this scum will never answer you directly.

Very true; Slammin has yet to address even one of my own or anyone's specifically related to the hoax questions or posts. I had blocked him til after my mid-term exam; but I have decided to premanently block until he addresses, intelligently and responsively to one of your, or anyone's posts that are pertinent to The Hoax, ie, the JQ and others. I would imagine that should this phenomena ever occur , someone will quote him as part of their reply.

Otherwise, the jew is not missed; and serves the purpose of teaching others whom may be new to debating lying, evasive kikes - he is a quick study in Der Chef's comments about arguing with juden. - Slammin is a good educational tool in that regard.