Log in

View Full Version : Campaign Critique


Alex Linder
March 20th, 2008, 03:48 AM
Ron Paul was overwhelmingly re-elected to his Texas Congressional District recently by a two to one margin over his GOP primary opponent Chris Peden. Despite the lies and smears the neoconservative sock puppet was mouthing, Peden could barely make a dent in Paulīs strong support in CD-14. It just goes to show that when Ron Paul is able to campaign amongst people that know him well, he does well.

Getting the rest of the country to know Paul as well as they do in Galveston and Victoria was the biggest challenge the campaign would face and unfortunately it did not come close to meeting it. Especially in the two states that offered Paul the chance to best use his retail politicking skills, Iowa and New Hampshire. Given the fact that Paul is not exactly a very telegenic figure nor a compelling orator, being more at home giving speeches at Von Miesian conferences or a near-empty House chamber, it was imperative that Paul get to know as many voters in the first two and most important states in the process when it comes to setting the tone for the whole campaign.

Unfortunately, Rep. Paul spent the least amount of time all of the GOP candidates in both Iowa and New Hampshire. For this we can only blame candidate himself for this damaging mistake. While much-lampooned-as-lazy Fred Thompson spent the New Yearīs weekend traveling through every frozen town in Iowa (and probably hating every minute of it), Paul spent his time by the fire in his Lake Jackson home reading policy manuals, or at least thatīs what his campaign said he was doing. Well, Thompsonīs last minute bus tour worked. He won 13 percent of the vote ahead of Paulīs 10 percent and kept his campaign going long enough to affect the outcome. Had Thompson finished behind Paul, there was a very good chance he would washed his hands of his whole wasted campaign there and then. Instead, the result was well enough to allow him to campaign with a straight face in South Carolina and help John McCain win that crucial state in Republican politics and subsequently win the nomination.

Why did Paul spend so little time in such crucial states? Paul made it clear that despite campaigning for the highest office in the land, he was not going to stop doing his day job. He refused to miss any Congressional votes or committee meetings while campaigning. That meant only campaigning on weekends and not only that, campaigning in other early states as well like Nevada, South Carolina, Michigan and Wyoming which spread him too thin. Truly this was a noble gesture, considering how much time away from work candidates like Senīs. Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Chris Dodd and John McCain spent away from their day jobs and shows how serious Paul is about representing his constituents. Itīs also utterly inane. No member of Congress who runs for president gets punished by the voters if they spend a little more time running for president than voting on a resolution establishing National Artichoke Day. For some odd reason Paul thought he had to do this (maybe to cast the dissenting vote). Not only did this gesture put him at a disadvantage to those members of Congress willing to shirk their duties as they tried to climb the Washington food chain, Paul was even more disadvantaged in a GOP field top heavy with candidates like Mitt Romney, Rudy Guliani, Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee who had no day jobs and could campaign in Iowa and New Hampshire as long and as often as they liked. Once again, the voters of Iowa and New Hampshire have shown they will not vote for phantoms. You either show up and speak to the voters and listen to them or you will not win.

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/55545

RabbitNoMore
March 20th, 2008, 04:19 AM
A good submission Alex,
But seriously;
Why would you even pay the slighest glancing attention to jerkoff teacupster/traitor RP anymore? He fucked us all here at WN really good and hard, to save his own ass . A cushy, jew-provided seat in congress. Old hat for this asshole.

Yeah sure, he voted against jew fuckery every single time, but who really gives a fuck, in light of the fact that he gladly bilked his faithful supporters out of instant, untold millions, and then bailed? Add to that the fact that, if he had to do it all over again, he would gladly fuck yt every single time. As long as that seat in CON-gress is reserved...

Not that he ever really had a choice or a chance in the matter mind you:rolleyes:, jew has seen to that.
He could never have been s-elected president, but moreover, he was a White man with something to lose.
Like H. Ross Perot, lots to lose. He saved his skin...Like HRP...

Hey Alex, I see that once upon a time, you actually went out one day and spoke up for Whites...LOUDLY...
I notice also, that as a result of this, you also spent some quality time in a jew-controlled, disease ridden, niggerfuxxated, shithole TN. jail. All for the WN cause. This cannot be refuted, even by jew.

Hey Alex, what do you have to lose? (Yeah I know all about lose and loose, definAtely, and ed-jew-ma-kayshun boils my blood too...)
I have a wife and kids, and unfortunately, I have everything to lose (not loose) if I misbehave. Tell me otherwise...

Most of us enlightened Whites could never dream of doing a thing like voicing our rage and then remaining calm, sitting in a niggerfuxated jail, and you did excatly that without flinching.

Yeah, whatever dude. You most likely would call me a suck ass (if you could even get past calling me "anonomys you" of course), because you can't accept the leadership role that fate has assigned you, even though you are destined for it. Who, being a White man, could easily accept that? I admire you and I hate you at the same time Linder. I know I'm not the only one here who feels this way. Irrelevant.

Yes you certainly are a giant prick when it comes to taking a compliment. It's the White Man's way I guess, but you could easily lead us... If you really wanted to...
I don't blame you for not wanting to. Leading White sheeple is a suck job...

In any event, we should have all seen RP's cowardice and fuckery coming at 10,000 miles out, but White Man's hope and trust is his undoing. We hoped, we got fucked.
Now I'm told our only hope against jew is Vader. :eek:

For all I know Vader is just another fucking jew diversion to keep yt off balance. Gods know I've been disgusted my whole lfe, by heavy-handed jew tactics in the past. the jew stops at nothing, and it will stoop as low as it needs to. You taught most of us that Alex. Will Ralph Vader prove to be anything other than a device of jew to further divide Whites like Alex and myself?? Who the fuck knows?

DO you Alex?


Hey alex...What NOW???

**

Francis Playfair
March 20th, 2008, 08:37 AM
Hey Alex, what do you have to lose? (Yeah I know all about lose and loose, definAtely, and ed-jew-ma-kayshun boils my blood too...)
I have a wife and kids, and unfortunately, I have everything to lose (not loose) if I misbehave. Tell me otherwise...

Most of us enlightened Whites could never dream of doing a thing like voicing our rage and then remaining calm, sitting in a niggerfuxated jail, and you did excatly that without flinching.

Let me tell you about "the fear", until you realize you have nothing to lose you will always be a prisoner, sitting on the wagon, rolling down the hill to the gallows.

There was this march in London, when I was younger, organized by the commies, a couple of thousand (maybe more, I don't recall the numbers) dirty, smelly reds, marching through the streets of a once proud capital.

We wanted to get a counter demo going, and there was a couple of things organized, but the cops were playing inteference, and trying to marshall us into ever less significant side streets, more and more removed from the march.

As we were being steered through narrow, meaningless side streets, a small bunch of us, about ten, saw an opportunity, managed to break off the pack, tore down a couple of streets, and charged head first towards the commies.

There was about ten of us, there was at least a couple of thousand of them.

Suicide?

I'll tell you what happened.

They flinched, they recoiled, they were scared.

The cops stopped us, before there was any real engagement, but as we charged head first towards those guys, odds of 200 to one, against, they were scared.

The "fear" was on them.

When you were a kid, were you ever called into the principals office?

Did you sit in front of him, on a sunny day, whilst he had his back to the window, and the sun streamed in, directly into your eyes?

If you did, do you remember how that gave him an edge?

Putting the fear on someone gives you that edge.

As long as we are afraid, they have the edge.

What have you got to lose?

I know I don't have a lot to lose.

They could strip me of my job, but they've done that before, and I'm still standing here, they could beat me to a pulp, but I've had that before too, and I'm still standing here, they could stab me, but I've been stabbed before, and I'm still standing here, they could shoot at me, but I've been shot at before, and I'm still standing here, they could attack my family, but that's happened before too, and I'm still standing here, they could lock me in a prison cell, but I've sat there before, and I'm still standing here.

What can they do to me?

Take away my money?

Sure, it will make life harder, but I'll still be here.

Take away my freedom?

I've already lost it, changing the location of my prison, from an open prison (my home), to a closed prison (a jail cell) doesn't make any difference, I know, I've been there, but I'm still here.

The only thing they can do is to kill me, and that's harder than it looks, because you can't plain as day go out and kill every White man on this planet.

They start doing that, and it puts the ball in our court.

They can't do a hell of a lot, because we really don't have much to lose.

They have it all to lose!

When we learn to stop being afraid, and transfer the "fear" onto them, then we have the whip hand.

That's what happened in London that day.

Was I afraid?

200 against 1! I'd be insane if I wasn't afraid for at least a nano-second, but I transfered that fear into courage and adrenaline, and I used that energy to propel me towards my enemy, which in turn transfered the "fear" to them.

Simple, psychological physics, if you want.

They have everything to lose, they have the money, they have the power, they have their control.

They need these things.

They are obsessed by their 'precious'.

What do we have to lose?

I'll tell you the main thing we have to lose, that's our children's future, and that can only be lost by inaction.

There is every reason in the world for us to stand strong, and proud and true, and there's every reason in the world for them to be afraid, and as soon as we figure that out, then we have revolution.

Kievsky
March 20th, 2008, 09:31 AM
Quite true, Mr. Playfair. They have it all to lose; we have little and less every day.

One thing I'd like to add is that as the economy declines, the jews are going to have to get more up close and personal with their victims. Back in the old days of Ukraine in the 1930's, the jews had the chutzpah to strap on a Mauser and extort grain and cattle from Ukrainian peasants, and round up several of them and kill them to instill terror in the general population. For whatever reason, the Ukrainians no longer possessed the spirit of Bogdan Khmelnitski, and failed to fight back even a little. I hope we'll do better when it comes to it.

Back in the 1930's the jewish communists were hungry and ambitious and filled with their insane, messianic vision of building global jewish communism, and they were ready to get their own jewish hands bloody to do it. Now, if they want to just maintain their cushy lifestyle, or something approximating, for another year, and another year, they are going to have to once again strap on the Mauser and "molon labe" so to speak -- come and get it, what little there is!

A lot of people think the jewish plan is so brilliant and they have it all planned out and everything is "going according to plan," etc. A lot of people whom I consider to be more intelligent than me believe this. But I still don't believe it.

I don't think, for example, the housing boom/bust is the culmination of a "brilliant plan." I think it was an easily foreseeable (by some like us) fuckup.

Iraq War -- another jewish project -- easily foreseeable fuckup.

Bolshevism/New Economic Plan/Collectivization of the farms -- easily foreseeable fuckup.

Israel/Lebanon War of August 2006 -- easily foreseeable fuckup.

Racial integration/equality, etc., another jewish project, easily foreseeable fuckup.

Federal Reserve printing money to "save the economy" -- easily foreseeable fuckup.

Industrializing agriculture and destroying family farms, as recommended in Karl Marx's treatises -- big time screw up, which the whole world is going to pay for.

Not controlling population or immigration -- based on cornucopian (growth economy) madness -- World Historical screwup which is creating literally Hell on Earth.

Here's the pattern -- jews get power, then screw everything up and try to blame everyone and everything except themselves. This modus operandi works for a while, until it doesn't work any more.

MikeTodd
March 20th, 2008, 09:38 AM
The kike has to win all day, every day!
We only have to win once!
The last time pays for all!