See the article HERE and then read the commentary, I didn't see a single negative comment. I'll bet the kikes are sorry they let this genie outta the bottle.

Psychology professor denounces departments' reprimands of his work (http://media.www.daily49er.com/media/storage/paper1042/news/2008/04/14/News/Psychology.Professor.Denounces.Departments.Reprimands.Of.His.Work-3322626-page2.shtml)

Statements from various CSULB departments deplore professor Kevin MacDonald's allegedly racist writings.

Colleen Donnelly

Several departments at Cal State Long Beach have released statements denouncing the writings of psychology professor Kevin MacDonald after accusations surfaced that MacDonald's writings and teachings are anti-Semitic.

Last semester, MacDonald sent an e-mail to the CSULB faculty confirming his belief that the Jewish race has had a negative effect on Western society. That thesis was published in MacDonald's book, "The Culture of Critique."

The history department's statement acknowledges the fact that MacDonald does not call himself a historian, but criticizes the historical claims MacDonald's work makes, saying he lacks "training or understanding of historical methodology."

Specific examples of MacDonald's views on European history were cited, as well as his arguments on the 1965 U.S. Immigration Law. The history department said that his writings on these topics demonstrated his disregard for historical fact. The department's statement added that MacDonald only used historical accounts that would support his claims, ignoring facts that proved his claims to be false.

Like most of the faculty, MacDonald received the statement in an e-mail sent to throughout the College of Liberal Arts.

"I was flabbergasted to see it. It was so outrageous," MacDonald said.

"I don't see how any historian could see that chapter and think I didn't read the research," MacDonald said in response to the history department's claim that he didn't read the Congressional debates surrounding the 1965 U.S. Immigration Law.

According to the history department's statement, "[MacDonald's] misuse of historical methodology would be unacceptable in an undergraduate history paper." The statement also says that the department is disturbed that in MacDonald's writings he identifies himself as a professor at CSULB.

MacDonald issued his own response, in which he outlined the sources he used while writing the chapter brought into question from "The Culture of Critique."

In an e-mail sent to the CLA forum, the anthropology department said it "voted unanimously to endorse the statements of the History Department and the Jewish Studies Program regarding writings by Kevin MacDonald which promote prejudice and intolerance."

The anthropology department also sent out a draft statement, which it will vote to finalize at its next meeting. The draft statement touches on the issue of academic freedom, but also says the department feels "it is important to clearly and publicly dissociate ourselves from work by Kevin MacDonald that promotes prejudice."

According to an e-mail from the psychology department, members took a straw ballot regarding MacDonald's writings and activities.

The e-mail stated that "results from the straw ballot indicate that a minority (21 percent) felt that no further action should be taken by the department, while the majority endorsed a number of explicit statements of dissociation."

Though the history and anthropology departments have chosen to distance themselves from MacDonald and his work, they said they maintain and respect his First Amendment rights and academic freedom.

Both statements led MacDonald to question just how much his freedoms were respected.

"The fact is that even though the history department and others at the university claim to defend my academic freedom, the intense assault on my work as well as the ostracism that one must endure certainly has a chilling effect on academic freedom," said MacDonald. "That is, professors who have views that conflict with well-entrenched, commonly held views are clearly getting the message that they will they will pay a high price for publicizing their views."

MacDonald has said he will take legal action about the statements made by the history department that claim he did not do proper research for his book. He said the claims were defamatory and libelous.

"Academic freedom doesn't mean you have the right to defame anyone," he said. "You can't violate other people's rights."

Source Daily49er (http://media.www.daily49er.com/media/storage/paper1042/news/2008/04/14/News/Psychology.Professor.Denounces.Departments.Reprimands.Of.His.Work-3322626-page2.shtml)

Be sure to read the commentary - the kikes aren't winning this one.

Commentary as of 0900 April 15, 2008

sf csulb student
posted 4/14/08 @ 12:42 PM PST
Whether or not you like the man personally, I am appalled at the statements made...as they are REPORTED here. To preface my position, I found Dr. MacDonald a very knowledgeable but somewhat boring lecturer. I am not his TA nor do I have any relationship with him. I am just a person offering some reason to claims as they are REPORTED in this article. I have not read the book, but the particular criticisms CITED here are flawed.

First of all, Dr.MacDonald teaches evolutionary psychology, a subject that is deeply connected to history. That his degree is not in history, anthropology or ethnic studies, does not discount his expertise in historical information.

As for the supposed scholars from other departments: No human being can possibly locate and consider EVERY view on any one subject. The responsibility of scholarly adults is to offer evidence that refutes certain claims instead of calling names and using emotional language to discredit another person's argument. Instead of acting like children, how about submitting practical, unemotional, logical evidence for consideration?

I am sure that the complaining departments all teach historical "facts" that identify some group as responsible for some event(s). I am also sure that someone from those groups have been insulted by ?factual history.? Because those "facts" may be more widely accepted by others does not always make them valid, nor does the case of a thought that is "new" make it without validity. As rational, educated adults we should always consider new information. If you don't then you are guilty of the same thing you accuse Dr. MacDonald of doing: only considering research that supports YOUR existing beliefs.

All groups, no matter how they are defined, have strengths and weaknesses; have done "good" things and "bad" things. The tricky part is being honest and responsible enough to "own" the good with the bad. This may or may not be the case here, but the method of opposition being used against Dr. MacDonald are unbecoming to a supposedly educated and scientific community.

Instead of making sweeping generalizations, name calling and fighting this battle using emotion and a closed mind, why don't the esteemed opposers calmly and reasonably offer valid evidence to refute the particular arguments or statements instead of using flawed and fallacious arguments themselves? We, as academics, should be able to consider the research of others as an effort to investigate issues, true or false, without reducing it to a personal insult and responding like children or jilted lovers. If you choose to operate in this manner you set your own research up to be criticized for its affect on emotions rather than its actual content.
Post a reply to this comment
Joe
posted 4/15/08 @ 5:54 AM PST
You seem perplexed at the adhominems cast at Dr. Macdonald.
The reasons are simple. Possibly too simple to rectify with the depth and demeanor of the attack on him.
When one has no facts to substantiate his argument and the facts actually disprove ones argument then the only way to validate the argument is to attack the man, his language, his clothes, his hair, his anything that steers the dialog away from the facts one wants hidden. This is the quintessential method used by those who know their adversary is correct so must misdirect those paying attention to questions other than what the author has written. The tactic works because we are easily diverted. Our attention span is too short to hold onto the original claims made by the author and instead we get lost in the minutia thrown at us by those wanting to keep uncomfortable facts away from public scrutiny. This is the reason for all hate laws. There is a history, the real history that some want desperately to keep hidden that hate laws and this "attack the man not the message" is designed to keep us from knowing.
There is an axiom that is pertinent here.
THERE IS NO REASON TO SUPPRESS A VIEWPOINT UNLESS IT IS TRUE!
Our enemies are the enemies of free speech. It is they that any and all venom should be directed at.
Be diligent at disproving Dr. Macdonalds claims, When you fail you will be in a better position to see your true enemies. Do the same with the claims of Dr. Tony Martin .









Originally posted by
sf csulb student
Whether or not you like the man personally, I am appalled at the statements made...as they are REPORTED here. To preface my position, I found Dr. MacDonald a very knowledgeable but somewhat boring lecturer. I am not his TA nor do I have any relationship with him. I am just a person offering some reason to claims as they are REPORTED in this article. I have not read the book, but the particular criticisms CITED here are flawed.

First of all, Dr.MacDonald teaches evolutionary psychology, a subject that is deeply connected to history. That his degree is not in history, anthropology or ethnic studies, does not discount his expertise in historical information.

As for the supposed scholars from other departments: No human being can possibly locate and consider EVERY view on any one subject. The responsibility of scholarly adults is to offer evidence that refutes certain claims instead of calling names and using emotional language to discredit another person's argument. Instead of acting like children, how about submitting practical, unemotional, logical evidence for consideration?

I am sure that the complaining departments all teach historical "facts" that identify some group as responsible for some event(s). I am also sure that someone from those groups have been insulted by ?factual history.? Because those "facts" may be more widely accepted by others does not always make them valid, nor does the case of a thought that is "new" make it without validity. As rational, educated adults we should always consider new information. If you don't then you are guilty of the same thing you accuse Dr. MacDonald of doing: only considering research that supports YOUR existing beliefs.

All groups, no matter how they are defined, have strengths and weaknesses; have done "good" things and "bad" things. The tricky part is being honest and responsible enough to "own" the good with the bad. This may or may not be the case here, but the method of opposition being used against Dr. MacDonald are unbecoming to a supposedly educated and scientific community.

Instead of making sweeping generalizations, name calling and fighting this battle using emotion and a closed mind, why don't the esteemed opposers calmly and reasonably offer valid evidence to refute the particular arguments or statements instead of using flawed and fallacious arguments themselves? We, as academics, should be able to consider the research of others as an effort to investigate issues, true or false, without reducing it to a personal insult and responding like children or jilted lovers. If you choose to operate in this manner you set your own research up to be criticized for its affect on emotions rather than its actual content.
Post a reply to this comment
HSS
posted 4/14/08 @ 5:50 PM PST
Back in the way back of 1964 & 1965, when I was a young, I came to almost the same conclusions that Dr. MacDonald arrived at years later in his very professional research.

My only difference with Kevin MacDonald, is that some Roman Catholic ethnic groups have played a negative role in the US, that in their own homelands they would not have played. Although, I do think the Roman Catholic ethnic groups have come to realize realize the error of their ways. Perhaps too late.
Post a reply to this comment
HSS
posted 4/14/08 @ 5:52 PM PST
Back in the way back of 1964 & 1965, when I was young , I came to almost the same conclusions that Dr. MacDonald arrived at years later in his very professional research.

My only difference with Kevin MacDonald, is that some Roman Catholic ethnic groups have played a negative role in the US, that in their own homelands they would not have played. Although, I do think the Roman Catholic ethnic groups have come to realize the error of their ways. Perhaps too late.
Post a reply to this comment
Fishman
posted 4/14/08 @ 7:48 PM PST
The very fact that the University has stooped so low simply serves to prove that MacDonald has been right all along. After all, the core of his research holds that Jews (1) pursue a collective self-interest, (2) actively persuade non-Jews to support Jewish interests, chiefly immunity from criticism. (3) cloak their motives in an appeal to universal values to conceal the self-serving nature of their undertaking, and most relevant (4) attempt to deal with critics by labeling, isolating, slandering, or intimidating them, except in those rare cases when they find it necessary to resort to murder.

The University's craven and disgusting open letter is just one more example of the centuries-old practices that Dr. MacDonald has so meticulously (and courageously) documented.

Shame on the University, and shame on everyone who signed this filthy missive. They have declared their own intellectual and moral bankruptcy in so doing.
Post a reply to this comment
James Morris
posted 4/14/08 @ 8:30 PM PST
Professor Kevin MacDonald's work has been much appreciated/valued by many to include myself.. I wouldn't have such an extensive understanding of the Jewish neoconservative movement (which pushed US to war in Iraq for Israel and is doing similar to get US into a war with Iran for Israel as well) if it weren't for his excellent 'Thinking about Neoconservatism' article and 'Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement' monograph which are both linked near the top of the following URL:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=32606

Here is a tiny URL for the above one:

http://tinyurl.com/3a6z7t
Post a reply to this comment
William S.
posted 4/14/08 @ 9:06 PM PST
Professor MacDonald represents a rare breed among intellectuals today - one that possesses intellect and courage. Ninety-five percent of modern professors in the social areas are either outright marxists or pitiful panderers to political correctness.

The flaiming irony of this situation is the actions of the censors, who's true goal despite whatever they may claim is to drive Prof. MacDonald out of a job, only serve to confirm his thesis of Jewish behavior!
Post a reply to this comment
Rob Chapman
posted 4/14/08 @ 9:30 PM PST
Professor MacDonald's research and published works are some of the most important that I've read. It's unfortunate that the so-called "scholars" at CSULB have chosen to attack MacDonald and alienate and attempt to punish him rather than engage in an honest debate on the actual MERITS of his works.

I've read "Culture of Critique", twice, and spent a great deal of time checking references and sources as the topic of Jewish history is of great interest and have found nothing that would lead one to beleive of any allegation's bantered about as true.

The faculty engaged in this nonsense have embarrassed themselves, the school and academia as a whole.

It's called: Intellectual Dishonesty.
Post a reply to this comment
Joe Shepherd
posted 4/14/08 @ 10:50 PM PST
If Prof. MacDonald is wrong then surely his opponents could dispute his claims in a public debate. I suspect they are too intellectually dishonest to defend their views.
Post a reply to this comment
Charles Fockaert
posted 4/14/08 @ 10:59 PM PST
I've read Professor MacDonald's book, the Culture of Critique. Anyone who says MacDonald didn't do his research or didn't accurate reflect what his research showed either didn't read COC or just plain doesn't like what the research, or the messenger, have to say.

My guess is it might be both, they didn't read the book and don't like hearing the truth and due to cognitive dissonance are lashing out.

It's time for the rest of us to put a stop to these kinds of attacks. Professor MacDonald, you have my absolutely and full support. Don't give in to these campus gauleiters.
Post a reply to this comment
Jerry Bolduc
posted 4/15/08 @ 12:00 AM PST
I have to agree with Professor MacDonald.

Here's a letter I sent to a NY Times reporter:


Hello Peter...I read your article on the ifamericansknew.org website titled "Speech on the MidEast Brings Opinions to a Boil".

First of all, I want you to understand that the United States and its' people have been thoroughly duped by the Jewish leadership! Take a look at this film...it's over an hour long, so schedule a time to see it...and remember while you watch it that the American taxpayers are FORCED to finance these atrocities thru their "no strings attached" foreign aid package of $3,000,000,000 per year:
Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land: Media & the Israel-Palestine Conflict

If that doesn't break your heart, I don't know what will.

Here is something I have been sending to people all over the country...the so-called Jewish Holocaust is a Jewish Hoax!:


Hello folks...I wrote to you several weeks ago concerning your Congressman, Robert Wexler. I was so disgusted with his deception that I did some research and I'd like to send you a copy of the information that I am sending to everyone around the country. It seems that there are Congressmen from all around South Florida and New York, who have signed on to these fraudulent "holocaust" schemes:

H.R.1746 (The Holocaust Insurance Accountability Act of 2007)

Title: To require disclosure of Holocaust-era policies by insurers and establish a federal cause of action for claims arising out of a covered policy.

Sponsor: Rep Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana [FL-18] (introduced 3/28/2007) Cosponsors (41)

Latest Major Action: 2/7/2008 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee Hearings Held.

COSPONSORS(41), ALPHABETICAL

Rep Ackerman, Gary L. [NY-5] - 7/24/2007
Rep Berkley, Shelley [NV-1] - 9/17/2007
Rep Bilirakis, Gus M. [FL-9] - 10/15/2007
Rep Blackburn, Marsha [TN-7] - 12/4/2007
Rep Cantor, Eric [VA-7] - 3/28/2007 (primary co-sponsor)
Rep Chabot, Steve [OH-1] - 3/28/2007 (primary co-sponsor)
Rep Cohen, Steve [TN-9] - 5/1/2007
Rep Diaz-Balart, Lincoln [FL-21] - 10/15/2007
Rep Engel, Eliot L. [NY-17] - 6/5/2007
Rep Faleomavaega, Eni F.H. [AS] - 9/17/2007
Rep Fortuno, Luis G. [PR] - 7/24/2007
Rep Gallegly, Elton [CA-24] - 10/15/2007
Rep Hare, Phil [IL-17] - 8/3/2007
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. [FL-23] - 11/6/2007
Rep Inslee, Jay [WA-1] - 10/22/2007
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] - 8/1/2007
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 6/20/2007
Rep Kirk, Mark Steven [IL-10] - 11/6/2007
Rep Klein, Ron [FL-22] - 5/1/2007
Rep Lantos, Tom [CA-12] - 6/20/2007
Rep Lowey, Nita M. [NY-18] - 9/17/2007
Rep Mahoney, Tim [FL-16] - 10/15/2007
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B. [NY-14] - 12/18/2007
Rep Meek, Kendrick B. [FL-17] - 5/1/2007
Rep Myrick, Sue Wilkins [NC-9] - 8/1/2007
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8] - 6/5/2007
Rep Pence, Mike [IN-6] - 3/28/2007 (primary co-sponsor)
Rep Ramstad, Jim [MN-3] - 11/6/2007
Rep Rohrabacher, Dana [CA-46] - 9/17/2007
Rep Rothman, Steven R. [NJ-9] - 8/1/2007
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] - 9/17/2007
Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4] - 2/7/2008
Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27] - 10/23/2007
Rep Smith, Christopher H. [NJ-4] - 5/1/2007
Rep Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8] - 12/4/2007
Rep Wasserman Schultz, Debbie [FL-20] - 5/21/2007
Rep Watson, Diane E. [CA-33] - 5/1/2007
Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-30] - 5/21/2007
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9] - 9/17/2007
Rep Wexler, Robert [FL-19] - 3/28/2007 (primary co-sponsor) A charlatan seeking to find financial
supporters for his re-election effort thru his "Impeach
Cheney" grandstanding.
Rep Wilson, Joe [SC-2] - 10/15/2007

While I'm at it, I want you to understand another deadly problem that has been allowed to fester in this country as put forth in the following message to the author of an excellent article I had read:

I read your article titled "Credit Default Swaps: Derivative Disaster DuJour" http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/derivative-disaster.php and I was ecstatic that, FINALLY, someone has the correct answer to our financial difficulty as you made manifest in your concluding paragraph. Indeed, if we would just make Congress honor their oaths to uphold and defend the Constitution, most, if not all, of our problems would lift as the morning mist before the rising sun.

Another issue that I think should be addressed as well, is the one of concentration of mass media control...only 4 or 5 corporations controlling what we see on TV, at the movies, and in the newspapers and magazines is unacceptable and has led to massive corruption within our government. As an example, were you aware that all but 43 members of Congress belong to AIPAC? That's why the Democrats didn't stop the funding for these criminal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan...they are afraid of the Jewish lobby and its' ability to ruin their political "careers" (as tho that is a legitimate profession) thru misinformation in the print and on TV news shows!

Take a look at what Robert Wexler is pushing in Congress (yes, the same Robert Wexler who is pushing for the impeachment of Dick Cheney...he has almost 200,000 people who have signed up on his website supporting that action and he is soliciting donations from all of them!) http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5729 He doesn't tell these people that he is pushing for this eternal holocaust reparation scheme...nor has he informed his constituency in Florida's 19th Congressional district. So I did! :)

Holocaust reparation schemes are gaining an international appeal http://www.budapestsun.com/cikk.php?id=27879

After I saw that one, I was really angry!

First of all, we are talking about something that allegedly happened nearly 70 years ago. When the "holocaust" museum was being built in Washington, DC, it was noted, at the time, that the evidence to prove that the holocaust ever happened would fill a shoe box! That's right...a shoe box!! Here we are in the 21st century and they're still looking for ways to scam us...yet, the Jews have never been able to prove that the so-called "holocaust" ever happened!

We now have tons of evidence to show that it DIDN'T happen the way it has been portrayed:

YouTube - Treblinka was No Extermination Camp - Just Transit Station
One Third of The Holocaust
1 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 1 of 7
2 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 2 of 7
3 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 3 of 7
4 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 4 of 7
5 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 5 of 7
6 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 6 of 7
7 of 7
YouTube - Cole in Auschwitz 7 of 7

http://nafcash.com/ (This is an excellent source...you simply must click on the links...the knowledge you will be
introduced to is stunning!)
http://rense.com/general80/furg.htm

How were they able to keep the fraud going for so long?
http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2008/03/12/who_controls_the_american_media
http://www.viewzone.com/dualcitizen.html


Here's the latest holo-hoax...more are on the way, I'm sure.

http://jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/news/article/2008030420080304holmem.html (Phoney holocaust book!)

The problem is that so many of the holocaust claims have been proven false. In addition to "Misha", other books like "The Painted Bird" and "Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood" have proven to be acute embarrassments. Claims of soap made from human fat and lampshades made from human skin have been discredited by modern forensics tests. There never was a camp Walscak...there are no mass graves at Treblinka! Something is clearly wrong here!

Had the holocaust happened as the orthodox account claims, there would be so much hard factual evidence around that there would be no need for the many hoaxes and deceptions.

The Germans even tried to help the Jews emigrate from Germany; when their ship arrived at various ports of call, not one country on the face of the earth wanted them! NOT ONE!!! Ask yourself 'why?'. Why were they so universally disliked? Again, I refer you to this article http://www.viewzone.com/dualcitizen.html . I maintain that this is why!

The ship eventually returned to Europe with the Jewish passengers still on board. That was the basis for this fraudulent legislation (our ole buddy, Robert Wexler from Florida's 19th District is behind this one too!)
Go to http://thomas.loc.gov and in the "Search Bill Text" block, type in "HR 1185" (minus the quotes) and select the radio button that says "Bill Number"...then click on the "Search" tab.

Keep in mind that the United States had interred the Japanese during WWII in conditions far worse than what Germany had used to inter their undesireables. We were at war folks...we, and they, had every right to protect ourselves from the threat of possible internal subversion!!!

Sincerely,
Jerry Bolduc

PS
Please feel free to show this message to your friends and to others in Florida's 19th District, as well as the folks in the surrounding districts that have Congressmen that are involved in this. See if this is what their constituents want them to do while serving in far away Washington, DC!

I'm sure you will agree that these issues need to be discussed as urgently as the dissolution of the fraudulent federal reserve system!
Post a reply to this comment
Fled Frintstone
posted 4/15/08 @ 1:36 AM PST
Holy crap, Batman. Who turned over the racist rock and ferreted out all of the bigots?
Post a reply to this comment
Savannah
posted 4/15/08 @ 2:17 AM PST
Originally posted by
Fled Frintstone
Holy crap, Batman. Who turned over the racist rock and ferreted out all of the bigots?


It's easy to call names, isn't it? That saves you the effort of actually refuting any of the claims made. Have you read the book? Done any research in these areas? If you have a valid argument against anything MacDonald has written, please make it. I won't hold my breath.
Post a reply to this comment
MeatwadGetsIt
posted 4/15/08 @ 4:19 AM PST
Originally posted by
Fled Frintstone
Holy crap, Batman. Who turned over the racist rock and ferreted out all of the bigots?


It seems the good Prof. McDonald has done that very well. If his research had any flaws, they would be listed and refuted in that order. Knowing how certain opposition is organized, when the messenger is what is being attacked, the message must be too close to the truth to list and refute, in that order.

Stand tall Professor McDonald, you have the facts behind you, as the attack method proves. They resorted to a poll regarding what is free speech or not,,, keep up the pressure. The truth will win.
Post a reply to this comment
Steven Douglas
posted 4/15/08 @ 4:14 AM PST
The orchestrated campaign against professor MacDonald is the latest uprising of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution: the conformists libel and denigrate the academic work done by an eminent scholar because his findings are non-conformist.

Is this really going on Cal State Long Beach Uni in 2008?
Unbelievable!
What a affront to acacemic freedom!
Post a reply to this comment
Charlotte Ann Creamer-Wyatt
posted 4/15/08 @ 5:33 AM PST
Anti-Zionism is the new blasphemy in a global Zionist theocracy. Those deemed guilty of it must be mercilessly punished in full view of all goyim so that others will be deterred from even thinking it. "Worship the Zionist god, or die!" Given the choice, I'd rather die, thank you.
Post a reply to this comment
C. Wernerhoff
posted 4/15/08 @ 6:18 AM PST
As an historian, I would have to say that I have obtained far more enlightenment from Professor Kevin MacDonald's writings than from most books by run-of-the-mill conventional academic historians, nearly all of whom, it would seem, are terrified to touch the really important subjects. It's a scandal that some of the most informative historical works of our time have been written by a psychology professor, not because psychology professors can't write history - obviously, they can - but because trained historians ought to be able to do at least as well. Instead, it seems they are content to pour out philosemitic propaganda.
Post a reply to this comment
Louis Calabro
posted 4/15/08 @ 6:23 AM PST
Rather than blindly denigrating and demeaning the apparently provocative writings of Professor Kevin MacDonald takes some time to view all of his writings and then come to a conclusion.

I for one will be sending him a donation to help him bring a civil action against those who defame and libel his good name.

Defend this good man from hateful attacks.
Post a reply to this comment
Deacon
posted 4/15/08 @ 7:32 AM PST
#########
#########

Professor MacDonald fails at revealing the truth extend of
Marxian Jews' evil works in the West. For example, he
fails at relating how hard Marxian-Jewish organizations
work at stripping the West of fundamental human rights,
such as free speech:

Magna Carta and Free Speech in GB (and America)
http://magnacartaandfreespeech.blogspot.com/

#######
#######
Post a reply to this comment
Richie Rich
posted 4/15/08 @ 7:32 AM PST
Any time a Jew is mentioned they go into crazy overdrive trying to equate it with bigotry. Zionism is a political apparatus for insuring Jewish domination of the political life worldwide, and it will be used as a hammer to bash anyone who dares to suggest that all Jews are not totally wonderful people with love for all humanity in their hearts.

Jews can do NO wrong, ever. That is the new Neocon way, and the destruction of the world is at hand because of it.
Post a reply to this comment
Curtis Maynard
posted 4/15/08 @ 7:36 AM PST
Dr. MacDonald has every right to voice his opinions, certainly as much right as any Jewish professor, and when was the last time yoiu ever heard of the media going after a Jewish professor for anything they've said?

I made a comment there, and I noticed that the vast majority of comments were pro-Macdonald, not only in his favor, but very well thought out. One of them was his former students and called him "competent but boring." Fair enough.

By the way, who here has been googling around the Internet looking for something unrelated to jews or WN'ism, and came across WN criticism of jews? I've done that more than once and was pleasantly surprised. WN's are still not very powerful, but we sure as hell rule the comment boards of the Internet :D

WN's are still not very powerful, but we sure as hell rule the comment boards of the Internet :D

And when people condemn keyboard commandoes bear this in mind, because as the MSM continues to lose its credibility, which it is on a daily basis, people will come to the blogs for their news, and when they do, we'll be there. That's why the kike is so determined to enact hate sp3eech legislation as quickly as possible. They'll probably get their way too, and when they do, we WNs must be willing to sacrifice our freedom for our children and the children of less deserving Whites too.

The kikenvermin shut down the open posting - now you have to register just to read the motherfucker!

More kike propaganda about KMAC. Please note that unlike the above article, you do not need to register to read this one. I hate kikes.

Hate speech forum makes waves in Beach Auditorium

CSULB psychology professor Kevin MacDonald, anti-illegal immigration sentiments and white supremacist "lone wolves" discussed.
Joanne Tucker
Issue date: 4/15/08 Section: News
PrintEmail Article Tools Page 1 of 1
Media Credit: Chay Chhuon
Kevin O'Grady, a panelist on Monday's forum from the Anti-Defamation League, addresses the crowd in the Beach Auditorium on Monday.


The Campus Forum on Hate Speech, Hate Crimes and Far Right Movements attracted a full crowd in the Beach Auditorium Monday, as panelists discussed hate crimes and ways to prevent future hate violence.

University Police officers were also present at the forum and provided a designated free speech zone outside the University Student Union.

As the opening event for LGBT Diversity Week, panelists of the forum agreed that "celebrating diversity is such a strong message," said panelist Randy Blazak, director of Hate Crimes Research Network. "It's more than tolerance."

One of the main topics of the forum was CSULB psychology professor Kevin MacDonald, whose published works have caused him to be accused of anti-Semitism and being a neo-nazi supporter.

"He's essentially reliving all the anti-Semitic views of the last 100 years," said panelist Heidi Beirich from the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), who investigated MacDonald in 2006. The SPLC tracks hate groups and crimes nationwide.

All panelists agreed that "the university needs to distance themselves from the work of MacDonald," Beirich said.

"MacDonald has been heralded by neo-nazi groups," said panelist Kevin O'Grady from the Anti-Defamation League. "Your university ... refuses to condemn him."

O'Grady said that he felt "silence sends a very clear and resounding message."

"This doesn't have to be a highly technical response to MacDonald," Beirich said. She said that a press release by CSULB President F. King Alexander disassociating the university with MacDonald would be all that was necessary.

"No one is trying to squash free speech," said panelist Brian Chase from Lambda Legal, a civil rights organization. "We're trying to squash harassment."

Alexandra Jaffe, an associate linguistics professor at CSULB, said she is "among the people that say it's not legitimate research. He is free to say it, and we are free to express our strongest possible distance with him."

In an April 11 e-mail statement sent to the Daily Forty-Niner, Alexander wrote that "despite the fact that I personally disagree and even find deplorable some beliefs and opinions expressed by a few individuals on our campus, particularly those ideas that are hurtful of certain groups, I believe as Thomas Jefferson stated that 'errors of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.'"

Alexander further explained that the university is a forum itself. "Universities should also be firmly committed, even at times when it is against popular opinion, to freedom of thought and when we act to restrict opinions from the far right or the far left, then it will not be long before we can no longer call ourselves a university."

Panelists agreed that student response to MacDonald is just as important as an executive response.

"You can pick at him," Beirich said. "You have every opportunity to stand up against him ... I hope you do take action."

According to the SPLC, the number of hate groups has increased by more than 45 percent, from 602 to 888, since 2000.

"The reason is largely a backlash against America's changing demographics as a result of immigration," Beirich said.

Panelist Nativo Lopez from the Mexican American Political Association also discussed illegal immigration hate groups.

According to Lopez, more than 62 percent of Americans, including Republicans, "express agreement to legalization of illegal immigrants."

"The growth of the immigrant population is an unstoppable tendency," Lopez said.

One other problem O'Grady discussed was keeping track of "the existence of lone wolves - the individual white supremacists and skinheads."

Blazak said the amount of underreported hate crimes emerges as a problem when trying to study hate groups, calling the dilemma a "huge underside of the iceberg."

"There is a continuing effort to increase the reporting," O'Grady said. "Hate flourishes anytime good people don't speak up."

Tiffany Rider also contributed to this report.

http://media.www.daily49er.com/media/storage/paper1042/news/2008/04/15/News/Hate-Speech.Forum.Makes.Waves.In.Beach.Auditorium-3325292.shtml

Please don't forget to leave comments here too

http://media.www.daily49er.com/media/storage/paper1042/news/2008/04/15/News/Hate-Speech.Forum.Makes.Waves.In.Beach.Auditorium-3325292.shtml

Thanks for the he link...

Somehow your link got behind the registration wall they've put up and I got a few licks in.

The absolute outrageousness of Beirich and the SPLC holding a conference linking the "far right" with their distorted definitions of "hate" is a prime example of how the "chosen" manipulate (young) minds.


Let's all show this hero of our people some support!

The history department's statement acknowledges the fact that MacDonald does not call himself a historian, but criticizes the historical claims MacDonald's work makes, saying he lacks "training or understanding of historical methodology.

T.J.B.

Ad hominem. The soundness of arguments does not depend upon anything but the argument itself. But they don't teach logic in the history department, do they? They teach nonsense like "textual criticism" instead.

"Training"? Is that a codeword for having retained ones free thinking despite every attempt to shut it down?

"Understanding"? Is that a codeword for not accepting the dictates of the Jews who run things?

"Methodology"? Is that a codeword for Marxist historiography and postmodernist deconstructivism?

The department's statement added that MacDonald only used historical accounts that would support his claims, ignoring facts that proved his claims to be false.

T.J.B.

When you cannot refute a work, you attack the methodology.