Log in

View Full Version : Eric Thomson: The Vampire Economy


Lars Redoubt
May 2nd, 2008, 12:03 AM
THE VAMPIRE ECONOMY: THE JEW WORLD ORDER’S ‘GLOBALIZATION’ RACKET

by E. Thomson

Newhall, California, is a long way from Transylvania, but at least one member of the vampire tribe passed through the small town when I was a school kid. Little did I know that I was witness to economic vampirism on a small scale. A wandering jew came to town and took over the town’s waterwell drilling company with a leveraged purchase of controlling interest. This takeover meant acquiring 51% of the company’s shares on borrowed money. The jew grabbed the liquid assets and sold the company’s real estate and equipment, then departed, leaving the town without an essential service. Had ‘privatization’ been in effect, he could have done the same to the fire department!

Bigger vampires like Milken, Boesky and Soros used similar methods to loot pension funds and destroy jobs, whenever they sank their fangs into a company. Their appetites were such that they adversely affected national economics. Soros is blamed for precipitating the Asian economic crisis by his gigantic transfer of wealth, some of which fell into the hands of his sheenie bandit tribe in Russia, alias, “the Russian (sic) Mafia”.

The massive diversion of money from the productive sectors of the economy, into the speculative, parasitic sector, alias the stock market is reflected in the rise of share prices and the concurrent rise in unemployment. In short, what’s good for the jews is bad for the Goyim. We should be neither surprised nor ignorant of this constant fact of life.

“Free trade” is a much touted mantra of the Jew World Order. In Argentina, such free trade policies led to the demise of domestic manufacturing. Some factories were converted into shopping malls. Productive jobs in the primary and secondary economic sectors diminished. Store clerks did not earn as much as factory workers and Argentina began to use the equivalent of IOUs to acquire foreign goods for its largely mercantile, consumer economy. No country can live off the tertiary or service sector alone, as U.S. bipeds will soon discover. Argentines are suffering the dire consequences of abandoning a diversified economy, which can manufacture its necessities and exports from its own raw materials. The first two sectors of a country’s economy are the locomotives which pull the third or service sector along. Without one or both of them, the service sector coasts to a halt. The U.S.A. is going the way of Argentina.

Leveraged buyouts, mergers and takeovers of essential and productive enterprises usually result in the reduction of jobs and output, on behalf of boosting share prices in the short run, through the sale of ‘surplus’ assets and the ‘savings’ from reduced salaries. It is the economic equivalent of arson-for-profit, the profit of a few vampires and the loss to the productive many. The victims are the former employees and the public at large.

Deregulation is deemed magical, for like magic, the barriers are torn down so the vampire can swarm in, to perpetrate the very abuses which brought about regulation in the first place! If the parasites have their way, there will be nothing left to regulate.

Privatization allows the vampires to deal with former government agencies as they deal with their non-government victims, with the additional benefit that government becomes their servant, as they bleed the country’s economy dry.

Globalization is vampirism on a global scale. Its major characteristics are the export of jobs and the importation of the jobless from other countries. This policy is imposed by World ZOG’s guns and usury, with increased oppression for all us non-vampires. Our lives depend on the speedy demise of the ZOG, so let’s get those wooden stakes good and sharp. ORION!

--------------------

ZOG-LOGIC: We kill Arab Moslems in their countries as we let them populate North America. This would mean that those who are here are ‘good’, while those who live in their own Arab Moslem countries are ‘bad’. Since ZOG believes that one’s place makes one ‘good’ or ‘bad’, we should be able to stop the war in Iraq by bringing all the Arab Moslems in Iraq here. Then we could embrace more diversity!

--------------------

ZOG says: Homogeneity bad; homosexuality good.

--------------------

JEWS say: Diversity is ‘good’ for Gentiles, but ‘bad’ for jews. Therefore, ZOG says: Gentiles must be inclusive, while jews can be exclusive, unless they are non-White Gentiles!

--------------------

ZOG SAYS: FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION FOR EVERYONE BUT WHITES!

--------------------

Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.

alex
May 4th, 2008, 09:07 AM
Nice essay.

What E. Thomson calls "vampirism" i simply call capitalism or a free market system.

He covered various subjects of the free market system, like the hedge funds, privatization, the stock exchange, outsourcing and immigration which all deserve a lengthy essay of their own.

Building on this essay, taking it as a fundament, i would like to expand the issue a little bit and widen the horizon. It's the typical anglo-saxon way to analyze an issue from an individualistic point of view, thereby losing the understanding for the general view and the repeating patterns, the system.

The so-called "vampires" in the cases above are the shareholders. Every shareholder profits when the business he has a share in, reduces costs and increases the profits, by any means possible. It is true however that the biggest shareholders most of the time seem to be hedge funds and banks.

How does a hedge fund function? It tries to gather as much capital as possible and invest it in business from which it hopes to achieve big profits. But in order to do so (in a free market system competing hedge funds exist) it has to promise a bigger turnout to its possible investors than that of its competitors. The result of that is, that the pressure for as high as possible profits gets transfered to the investments it has made (usually the manufacturing sector). In order to keep its promise it will apply radical measures which will have consequences for the businesses it has invested in.

Isn't that the way a bank operates too? It simply invests (by buying shares) the money of its customers in businesses which promise a good turnout. And here again, the banks have to compete with each other in a free market system leading to higher profit pressure.

So who is to blame now? The people investing their capital in banks and hedge funds? Is it even possible in a capitalist system to do without them?

The fact of the matter is that the free market system creates its own downfall and never before in recent times is its failure so visible to so many people before. Whats missing is an alternative.