Log in

View Full Version : Now, how would you interpret this statement?


Stronza
May 28th, 2008, 10:08 PM
The following is an excerpt from a recent interview with Ron Paul:

ALI: You’re a fan of the free market. However, many, such as those in third world countries, lament the use and abuse of free market exploitation by predatory actors who subvert ethnical norms for self-profit at the expense of the country’s labor, environment and resources. How can you, if at all, ensure the free market isn’t ruled by an iron fist of the few and truly allows for efficient and fair distribution of capital? It has never worked that way has it?

PAUL: Well, it depends. If you have true, free market capitalism and property rights it works. But, if you have people who don’t understand and recognize private property rights and contracts and sound money like we did in this country – that’s why it worked up until it started to change from the Depression on. That’s why we don’t have real wealth anymore; we have apparent wealth based on borrowing. A country that would follow capitalistic viewpoints would become very wealthy. Anything in the West where they had famine at one time, the only thing that got rid of famine and child labor and all the poverty that so many countries suffer from all came about with the recognition that people are allowed to make profits.

http://counterpunch.com/waj05282008.html

-JC
October 25th, 2009, 06:23 AM
The following is an excerpt from a recent interview with Ron Paul:

http://counterpunch.com/waj05282008.html

... read "communist." That's the context. That's all.

Kievsky
October 25th, 2009, 07:16 AM
No. He means White, Western people:

If you have true, free market capitalism and property rights it works. But, if you have people who don’t understand and recognize private property rights and contracts and sound money like we did in this country

"Don't understand" because it's not in their genes to understand. They didn't spend enough cold winters evolving long term thinking.

John in Woodbridge
October 25th, 2009, 08:34 AM
Interestngly enough, the most damaging laws regarding personal property rights have been the 1960 civil rights laws. These laws have eviscerated personal property rights and opened up a whole venue in legal extortion.

Unfortunately there isn't a viable political force that opposes these very bad laws at the moment. The best we can hope for right now is the federal government becoming impotent to the point they are simply not enforced.