Lars Redoubt
June 2nd, 2008, 01:15 AM
13 MAY 08
Dear Phil: Many thanks for the Irving book on The Luftwaffe. I almost felt as if I were reading about old comrades, since I’ve corresponded with & interviewed several Luftwaffe heroes. In my book, they are all heroes, & if we consider Milch, he withstood the temptations only attributed to Jesus. All he had to tell the jew at Nuremberg was that he was a jew, & all things would be given him. But Milch refused to use his jewishness as a key to freedom. Almost casually, he stood firm, & he refused to denounce his comrades, thereby incurring life in the ZOG-gulag. Rudolf Hess did no less, for he was apparently offered such Judeo-Satanic perks if he would renounce his loyalty to National Socialism & become the Soviet puppet governor of the DDR or East Germany. Hess refused the offer. Apparently, Speer was more pliable. Dr. Rudolph, a Nazi rocket scientist who worked with von Braun, sold out by denouncing his people & their government. I worked with him in Toronto, on his immigration case. The jews used his own statements of 1947 to prevent him from even visiting North America. I told him that “You joined the enemy in time of war, & you betrayed your people. For that you should be hanged, but you are being punished by the wrong people for the wrong reason. In any case, you are being punished.” Rudolph turned pale & began to co-operate in his own defense, but CANZOG used his 1947 statements against him: A traitor betrayed by his own treason. How fitting! This was a man with lots of technical knowledge, but hardly any morals & less wisdom. In some respects, I felt sorry for him, but I could see justice, of a sort, being done in his case, as it was in the case of Zündel. ”Time wounds all heels,” as some say.
I don’t consider myself a ‘superman’ of virtue, but I am committed to the Cause for which I stand, & I shall support that Cause as long as I can, with every means available, on behalf of the children I never had, & The Race who gave me birth: When they are bad, they are very very bad, but when they are good, they are truly wonderful.
Thanks, as always, for the latest International Forecaster. I agree that economic disaster is coming, soon, but I’m reminded of a mathematical proposition in which an oncoming object approaches collision with another object in infinity, by halving the distance between them at high speed. The teacher said that no matter how close the two objects came to collision, they would never collide, for the halving of the distance separating them would be infinite. Ha! I think that we live on a finite planet, with a finite economy & finite stupidity, so our economic collision with reality will occur, or has already begun to occur in many cases. Until that time, unthinking Goyim can say, “What, me worry?” & “Prosperity is just around the corner.” “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself. Just spend all you can, while you can,” &c., as we were told in the 1930s. Some think that “It’s darkest before the dawn,” but others say: “It’s always darkest before it goes totally black.” I imagine that ancient Romans had such thoughts before the demise of The Roman Empire. Our lack of wisdom causes us to repeat the mistakes of history, even when we have that history in our libraries & schools. Perhaps we could excuse the first Romans for making such mistakes, but we have no excuse, for this is the outcome our Founding Felons courted by realizing Rome’s republic of the rich, who are neither wise nor noble; just greedy. It is therefore abusive of language to dub our rulers as “elite,” when, in fact, they are scum, of the sort which floats in cesspools. As Orwell warned: “Tyranny begins with the abuse of language.” Look how long our ZOG took to admit that torture is, in fact, torture. Apparently, some Goyim are still confused, for they wish to be confused, rather than heed the wee, faint voices of their flabby consciences. Then they would know that we have become as ’bad’ as our touted enemies, in the brief course of our history.
It is marvelous folly indeed to wage undeclared war against an undefined enemy on behalf of indeterminate objectives until we self-destruct. But the U.S. Goyim find such considerations too painful to contemplate, for that would constitute THINKING. How lucky they feel to have the jews to do our thinking for us: Onward Christian soldiers! Baah, baah. The kosher slaughterhouse awaits, like those “air-raid shelters” of “The Time Machine.”
In that story, the jewlike Morlocks destroyed the knowledge of the Eloi, just as our jew librarians toss out such books as Irving’s on The Luftwaffe. I wonder if they replaced it with the same title, in new condition. You might see if the book is still available at your library, but since Irving is not quite kosher, it may have gone down Orwell’s 1984 Memory Hole, alias oblivion, to prevent the Eloi alias Goyim from reading it. Jews brag that they steal library books which they deem unkosher. Letting jews into our libraries is like letting Michael Jackson look after our children. What fools these Goyim be.
All the best, as always. DOWZ! ORION!
Eric
--------------------
From page 2 (Section 2, a & b) and page 3 of Erhard Milch’s spoken statement, sworn and notarized on 9 April 1947.
Generalfeldmarschall Erhard Milch
In this connection I would also like to convey the following facts: On 17 September 1945, Major Emery, an interrogator from England, whom I already knew as he was known in England, or “Englishman”, as he was known in Germany, sought me in my quarters in the Kaufbeuren Interrogation Compound. I suppose that his real name is different. He was, as he had once old me, a New York banker. He commanded the American interrogation group to which a Capt. Tracy (also a cover name, most likely) also belonged. The American interrogation group was located in the English interrogation compound of Camp 7. Mr. Emery asked me about my ancestry, meaning that if I were of jewish ancestry, be would be able to remove me from all further prosecution. As I informed him that his supposition was not pertinent, he thought that be could not change things. The same gentleman visited me in Nuremberg on 5 November 1945, as I was just being questioned by an American interrogator. By chance I heard that it was a Major Mohagan (?). After a short conference, Emery Mohagan asked that we be left alone. Emery then said to me that if I were to make more favorable statements on behalf of Göring, Speer and the other accused in the International Military Tribunal, I must myself reckon with a war crimes trial against me. I replied that I took part in no war crimes and I could not see how I could be tried. Emery answered: “That is a small matter. If we wish, we could try every German, regardless if he committed crimes or not. Why do you want to stand up for Göring, Speer et al.? They would not do it for you, and I shall give you some good advice: It is in your own interests to testify against these people.” I replied that I could only tell the truth and that my person played no role in this matter, and that I did not fear a trial. Emery answered: “You must consider that you are still young, that you can again play a role, and that you must think of your family.”
Naturally I refused his offer, even if it were well-intended. With that he concluded that he could no longer be of any assistance. In this instant I knew that they would attempt to start a war crimes trial against me. I have also brought this matter to the attention of several comrades in Nuremberg as well as in Dachau, and also to the Swiss representative of The International Red Cross in Geneva, at that time.
(signed) Erhard Milch
The above signature of Erhard Milch, given at the Nuremberg Justice Building, before Attorney Dr. Friedrich Bergold, is hereby attested and witnessed by me.
Nuremberg, 9 April 1947
(signed) Dr. Friedrich Bergold
Defence Attorney for Military Tribunal II
Nuremberg
--------------------
The above is an all-important document proving clearly how brutal and unjust the Allies and their mostly jewish trial specialists were in laying trumped up charges against German leaders.
Translated from the German by E. Thomson
--------------------
12 Jewlie 06
Dear Phil: Many thanks for your letter of Jewlie 10th & the weird enclosures! “Train Wreck of the Week” was good, as usual, with its connection between crime & banking. The anarchist nobleman, Bakunin, said that “small crooks rob banks. Big crooks establish them.” When I asked my college economics prof. what the difference was between banking & counterfeiting, he smiled & said: “Bankers do not print money & counterfeiters do not charge interest.” Obviously, banking is a better racket than counterfeiting!
Ah, Technocracy! I’m reminded of my youth. I think I was around 14 when I met my first Technocrats, who lent me their books. The message was based on one theory (false!) for The Great Depression: over-production. The real reason for The Depression of the 1930s was the bankster-created money shortage, which had nothing to do with production of goods & services. That’s why the Communists said: “Capitalism can produce, but it cannot distribute.” That was another ‘red’ herring to gull the Goyim. Technocracy borrowed its Labor Theory of Value from socialists, both of whom are wrong, of course. Value does not depend on the amount of energy required to perform a task, but supply & demand determine value. A diamond found on the beach, as occurred in Australia, is just as valuable as a diamond brought up at great expense from the bowels of the earth. The amount of energy expended in obtaining a diamond has nothing to do with its quality, nor its market value. Thoreau wrote of an Indian who wanted Whitemen’s money, so he wove a big basket, but nobody would buy it for money. Yes, he put in the labor & the energy, but no one wanted the basket, so it was worthless on the market. A woodcutter expends much more energy at his production than does a brain surgeon or a violinist, or even a cabinet-maker. Under Technocracy, he should receive more pay because he, the woodcutter, put the most energy into his product, than did the others! But, again, we see supply & demand which determines the value of the product & the labor. Technocracy advocated the distribution of “Energy Certificates,” based on a head-count of the population. Each citizen was deemed to be “worth” so much in terms of projected productivity. The Energy Certificates allowed the purchase of goods & services in Technocratic Society. As I recall, nobody owned anything, but he was entitled to use &/or consume what he bought with his Energy Certificates. Technocracy was dualistic, proclaiming abundance & scarcity simultaneously: Machines & technology made production abundant, as productivity made natural resources scarce & polluted our environment.
With such abundant productivity made possible by mechanization & automation, there was to be no scarcity of goods & services, but fewer & fewer people would be needed to produce more & more goods & services. That is why purchasing power was to be determined by head count, rather than work done. Technocracy’s labor force was drafted: all citizens had to perform so many years of work before they could retire, & hand over their jobs to their replacements. No provision was made, that I know of, for disabled persons who could not do any sort of work, nor was it stated that such persons would receive their share of Energy Certificates. To my knowledge, Technocracy was not Marxist, so they did not advocate the Marxist creed of “From each, according to his ability, to each, according to his need.”
Obviously, but not to Technocrats, people are not equally productive, nor is it possible to increase the number of people infinitely, if we believe that productivity depletes & pollutes our environment. In Canada, there was a movement similar to Technocracy in the 1930s. It was called The Social Credit Party, which may still exist. It came to power in Alberta, in 1936, the depth of The Depression. The Social Credit provincial government began to issue “Prosperity Certificates” which were legal tender, usable as money. This quickly brought retaliation from the banksters’ Bank of Canada, which threatened Alberta with military invasion if the “Prosperity Certificates” were not withdrawn immediately, so the Banksters’ Depression could resume. The Social Creditors caved in to jew pressure, & their party became a hollow shell. In the USA, the head of Technocracy was invited to explain his party’s program. As I understand from some who heard his incoherent speech, the head Technocrat failed to explain his program for ending The Depression & for running a Technocratic society. Was he stupid, or was he paid to be stupid? is my question.
Social Credit has been tempting to Catholics, who imagine that they can f..k their way to prosperity, but only in a cannibalistic, slave-trading society, in which people are of value as goods & services, themselves. I pointed out that productivity gives value to money, not consumers. I suggested my Social Creditor do an experiment: suppose every Chinaman were to receive $10,000 in Chinese money, just for existing. Would that bring about prosperity? No, it would bring about inflation, for the supply of money would suddenly exceed the supply of goods & services. Of course, the Mexicans would love such a system, but they would soon discover inflation, along with Mexican-style depletion & pollution of resources. I note that your Technocrats call themselves “North Americans.” This is a geographical location. As yet, there is no North American government, nor a North American political-economy, nor North American citizens. Presently, North America, which runs all the way to the Colombian border with Panama, including Central America, is divided into separate jurisdictions, with separate citizenships, such as Canadian, U.S.A., Mexican, &c. We know that the ZOG wants such an entity, but the massive illegal immigration into North America may cause disintegration before such an unwieldy amalgamation can come about.
Assuming that the Judeo-Freemasonic scheme of continental amalgamation is realized under a new Continental Congress, we should also assume that it would be under ZOG’s jew-banksters, as usual. This regime would preclude the Technocratic economic system by which purchasing power is distributed by head-count, rather than work performed.
Human inequality, as well as racial & cultural differences are ignored by the Technocrats, which invalidates their program from the outset. Who are they to tell people what is “enough,” for example? When the Zionist powers that be want more for themselves & less for the Goyim, will the Technocrats object? If they do object, how would they make the malefactors of great wealth behave? Nobody has done so in recorded history, least of all the Technocrats in a century of their existence! In their publication I see no new additions, only omissions, but thanks for a trip down Memory Lane!
In regard to the bible-banger-blather, prophecy is paralysis, for it discourages improved behavior. It is said that the Devil can quote scripture, so whenever I see scripture quoted, I know it’s the work of the Devil. Savitri Devi warned that other-worldly religions are bad because they discourage good people from striving to improve this world. As one writer said: “For Evil to triumph, it is only necessary that good men do nothing.”
In his “Civil War Two,” Thomas Chittum describes a race in which the ZOG promotes globalism against U.S. Patriotism, while the continent rapidly fills with hostile aliens who claim their turf. The race is between the forces of globalism versus the racial rivalries which will balkanize the U.S.A. & cause it to disintegrate. Unless there is a Change of Mind with Whites, we shall remain as spectators & as victims of these processes. Kennewick Man shows us that something similar has happened before on this continent, wherein Whites have been adulterated & then killed by Asians.
The artificiality you condemn, our separateness from Nature, are decreed by Judaism in all its anti-Nature forms, for Judaism claims that man is not part of Nature, so natural laws do not apply to man, who may deplete & pollute his environment as he chooses, on behalf of man’s multiplication, as commanded in the jew-book. The genocidal jew, Morgenthau, figured that the destruction of German industry would cause the deaths of two thirds of the German population quickly, & that the remainder could be sterilized. Ted Kaczinski (sp?) wanted to de-industrialize North America, with no limit to population. Without industry, such as factories, food processing & storage facilities, electricity, transport, farms, dairies, distribution centers such as food stores, water systems, sewage systems & treatment plants, public health & sanitation measures, the present population could not be maintained, let alone multiplied. In a Kaczinski state of Nature, the majority would starve from lack of food & die from drinking contaminated water. With ‘natural’ living conditions, a population would suffer the fate of armies in the U.S. Civil War, in which 9 died of disease for every soldier killed in battle. When troops camped out in one place for too long, their drinking water would become contaminated from human waste & disease would set in. Only a few may live off the land, as did the American Indians before the second arrival of the Europeans. As I understand, there are many more “Indians” now than there were before Columbus, so for people to live ‘naturally,’ immense numbers would first have to die. Man is ‘unnatural’ to a degree, for he must use his brain to survive. His teeth are too small to impress a tiger; he has no strength compared to a gorilla; his fur is too thin to withstand a winter; he is too slow to catch deer & antelope, & he is too puny even to slow down a buffalo. To exist, man invents, but he must limit the scope of his inventions & above all, limit his numbers if he wants to live on this planet much longer. Man’s duty to himself is to improve himself & to limit his numbers. If not, Nature will do so, for Nature is Nazi, & man is just another life-form among many. Man can never ‘defeat’ or ‘conquer’ Nature. All he can do is to find his place within the Natural Order, & behave himself accordingly. How simple, but how very difficult it is! All the best. DOWZ! & ORION!
Eric
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.
Dear Phil: Many thanks for the Irving book on The Luftwaffe. I almost felt as if I were reading about old comrades, since I’ve corresponded with & interviewed several Luftwaffe heroes. In my book, they are all heroes, & if we consider Milch, he withstood the temptations only attributed to Jesus. All he had to tell the jew at Nuremberg was that he was a jew, & all things would be given him. But Milch refused to use his jewishness as a key to freedom. Almost casually, he stood firm, & he refused to denounce his comrades, thereby incurring life in the ZOG-gulag. Rudolf Hess did no less, for he was apparently offered such Judeo-Satanic perks if he would renounce his loyalty to National Socialism & become the Soviet puppet governor of the DDR or East Germany. Hess refused the offer. Apparently, Speer was more pliable. Dr. Rudolph, a Nazi rocket scientist who worked with von Braun, sold out by denouncing his people & their government. I worked with him in Toronto, on his immigration case. The jews used his own statements of 1947 to prevent him from even visiting North America. I told him that “You joined the enemy in time of war, & you betrayed your people. For that you should be hanged, but you are being punished by the wrong people for the wrong reason. In any case, you are being punished.” Rudolph turned pale & began to co-operate in his own defense, but CANZOG used his 1947 statements against him: A traitor betrayed by his own treason. How fitting! This was a man with lots of technical knowledge, but hardly any morals & less wisdom. In some respects, I felt sorry for him, but I could see justice, of a sort, being done in his case, as it was in the case of Zündel. ”Time wounds all heels,” as some say.
I don’t consider myself a ‘superman’ of virtue, but I am committed to the Cause for which I stand, & I shall support that Cause as long as I can, with every means available, on behalf of the children I never had, & The Race who gave me birth: When they are bad, they are very very bad, but when they are good, they are truly wonderful.
Thanks, as always, for the latest International Forecaster. I agree that economic disaster is coming, soon, but I’m reminded of a mathematical proposition in which an oncoming object approaches collision with another object in infinity, by halving the distance between them at high speed. The teacher said that no matter how close the two objects came to collision, they would never collide, for the halving of the distance separating them would be infinite. Ha! I think that we live on a finite planet, with a finite economy & finite stupidity, so our economic collision with reality will occur, or has already begun to occur in many cases. Until that time, unthinking Goyim can say, “What, me worry?” & “Prosperity is just around the corner.” “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself. Just spend all you can, while you can,” &c., as we were told in the 1930s. Some think that “It’s darkest before the dawn,” but others say: “It’s always darkest before it goes totally black.” I imagine that ancient Romans had such thoughts before the demise of The Roman Empire. Our lack of wisdom causes us to repeat the mistakes of history, even when we have that history in our libraries & schools. Perhaps we could excuse the first Romans for making such mistakes, but we have no excuse, for this is the outcome our Founding Felons courted by realizing Rome’s republic of the rich, who are neither wise nor noble; just greedy. It is therefore abusive of language to dub our rulers as “elite,” when, in fact, they are scum, of the sort which floats in cesspools. As Orwell warned: “Tyranny begins with the abuse of language.” Look how long our ZOG took to admit that torture is, in fact, torture. Apparently, some Goyim are still confused, for they wish to be confused, rather than heed the wee, faint voices of their flabby consciences. Then they would know that we have become as ’bad’ as our touted enemies, in the brief course of our history.
It is marvelous folly indeed to wage undeclared war against an undefined enemy on behalf of indeterminate objectives until we self-destruct. But the U.S. Goyim find such considerations too painful to contemplate, for that would constitute THINKING. How lucky they feel to have the jews to do our thinking for us: Onward Christian soldiers! Baah, baah. The kosher slaughterhouse awaits, like those “air-raid shelters” of “The Time Machine.”
In that story, the jewlike Morlocks destroyed the knowledge of the Eloi, just as our jew librarians toss out such books as Irving’s on The Luftwaffe. I wonder if they replaced it with the same title, in new condition. You might see if the book is still available at your library, but since Irving is not quite kosher, it may have gone down Orwell’s 1984 Memory Hole, alias oblivion, to prevent the Eloi alias Goyim from reading it. Jews brag that they steal library books which they deem unkosher. Letting jews into our libraries is like letting Michael Jackson look after our children. What fools these Goyim be.
All the best, as always. DOWZ! ORION!
Eric
--------------------
From page 2 (Section 2, a & b) and page 3 of Erhard Milch’s spoken statement, sworn and notarized on 9 April 1947.
Generalfeldmarschall Erhard Milch
In this connection I would also like to convey the following facts: On 17 September 1945, Major Emery, an interrogator from England, whom I already knew as he was known in England, or “Englishman”, as he was known in Germany, sought me in my quarters in the Kaufbeuren Interrogation Compound. I suppose that his real name is different. He was, as he had once old me, a New York banker. He commanded the American interrogation group to which a Capt. Tracy (also a cover name, most likely) also belonged. The American interrogation group was located in the English interrogation compound of Camp 7. Mr. Emery asked me about my ancestry, meaning that if I were of jewish ancestry, be would be able to remove me from all further prosecution. As I informed him that his supposition was not pertinent, he thought that be could not change things. The same gentleman visited me in Nuremberg on 5 November 1945, as I was just being questioned by an American interrogator. By chance I heard that it was a Major Mohagan (?). After a short conference, Emery Mohagan asked that we be left alone. Emery then said to me that if I were to make more favorable statements on behalf of Göring, Speer and the other accused in the International Military Tribunal, I must myself reckon with a war crimes trial against me. I replied that I took part in no war crimes and I could not see how I could be tried. Emery answered: “That is a small matter. If we wish, we could try every German, regardless if he committed crimes or not. Why do you want to stand up for Göring, Speer et al.? They would not do it for you, and I shall give you some good advice: It is in your own interests to testify against these people.” I replied that I could only tell the truth and that my person played no role in this matter, and that I did not fear a trial. Emery answered: “You must consider that you are still young, that you can again play a role, and that you must think of your family.”
Naturally I refused his offer, even if it were well-intended. With that he concluded that he could no longer be of any assistance. In this instant I knew that they would attempt to start a war crimes trial against me. I have also brought this matter to the attention of several comrades in Nuremberg as well as in Dachau, and also to the Swiss representative of The International Red Cross in Geneva, at that time.
(signed) Erhard Milch
The above signature of Erhard Milch, given at the Nuremberg Justice Building, before Attorney Dr. Friedrich Bergold, is hereby attested and witnessed by me.
Nuremberg, 9 April 1947
(signed) Dr. Friedrich Bergold
Defence Attorney for Military Tribunal II
Nuremberg
--------------------
The above is an all-important document proving clearly how brutal and unjust the Allies and their mostly jewish trial specialists were in laying trumped up charges against German leaders.
Translated from the German by E. Thomson
--------------------
12 Jewlie 06
Dear Phil: Many thanks for your letter of Jewlie 10th & the weird enclosures! “Train Wreck of the Week” was good, as usual, with its connection between crime & banking. The anarchist nobleman, Bakunin, said that “small crooks rob banks. Big crooks establish them.” When I asked my college economics prof. what the difference was between banking & counterfeiting, he smiled & said: “Bankers do not print money & counterfeiters do not charge interest.” Obviously, banking is a better racket than counterfeiting!
Ah, Technocracy! I’m reminded of my youth. I think I was around 14 when I met my first Technocrats, who lent me their books. The message was based on one theory (false!) for The Great Depression: over-production. The real reason for The Depression of the 1930s was the bankster-created money shortage, which had nothing to do with production of goods & services. That’s why the Communists said: “Capitalism can produce, but it cannot distribute.” That was another ‘red’ herring to gull the Goyim. Technocracy borrowed its Labor Theory of Value from socialists, both of whom are wrong, of course. Value does not depend on the amount of energy required to perform a task, but supply & demand determine value. A diamond found on the beach, as occurred in Australia, is just as valuable as a diamond brought up at great expense from the bowels of the earth. The amount of energy expended in obtaining a diamond has nothing to do with its quality, nor its market value. Thoreau wrote of an Indian who wanted Whitemen’s money, so he wove a big basket, but nobody would buy it for money. Yes, he put in the labor & the energy, but no one wanted the basket, so it was worthless on the market. A woodcutter expends much more energy at his production than does a brain surgeon or a violinist, or even a cabinet-maker. Under Technocracy, he should receive more pay because he, the woodcutter, put the most energy into his product, than did the others! But, again, we see supply & demand which determines the value of the product & the labor. Technocracy advocated the distribution of “Energy Certificates,” based on a head-count of the population. Each citizen was deemed to be “worth” so much in terms of projected productivity. The Energy Certificates allowed the purchase of goods & services in Technocratic Society. As I recall, nobody owned anything, but he was entitled to use &/or consume what he bought with his Energy Certificates. Technocracy was dualistic, proclaiming abundance & scarcity simultaneously: Machines & technology made production abundant, as productivity made natural resources scarce & polluted our environment.
With such abundant productivity made possible by mechanization & automation, there was to be no scarcity of goods & services, but fewer & fewer people would be needed to produce more & more goods & services. That is why purchasing power was to be determined by head count, rather than work done. Technocracy’s labor force was drafted: all citizens had to perform so many years of work before they could retire, & hand over their jobs to their replacements. No provision was made, that I know of, for disabled persons who could not do any sort of work, nor was it stated that such persons would receive their share of Energy Certificates. To my knowledge, Technocracy was not Marxist, so they did not advocate the Marxist creed of “From each, according to his ability, to each, according to his need.”
Obviously, but not to Technocrats, people are not equally productive, nor is it possible to increase the number of people infinitely, if we believe that productivity depletes & pollutes our environment. In Canada, there was a movement similar to Technocracy in the 1930s. It was called The Social Credit Party, which may still exist. It came to power in Alberta, in 1936, the depth of The Depression. The Social Credit provincial government began to issue “Prosperity Certificates” which were legal tender, usable as money. This quickly brought retaliation from the banksters’ Bank of Canada, which threatened Alberta with military invasion if the “Prosperity Certificates” were not withdrawn immediately, so the Banksters’ Depression could resume. The Social Creditors caved in to jew pressure, & their party became a hollow shell. In the USA, the head of Technocracy was invited to explain his party’s program. As I understand from some who heard his incoherent speech, the head Technocrat failed to explain his program for ending The Depression & for running a Technocratic society. Was he stupid, or was he paid to be stupid? is my question.
Social Credit has been tempting to Catholics, who imagine that they can f..k their way to prosperity, but only in a cannibalistic, slave-trading society, in which people are of value as goods & services, themselves. I pointed out that productivity gives value to money, not consumers. I suggested my Social Creditor do an experiment: suppose every Chinaman were to receive $10,000 in Chinese money, just for existing. Would that bring about prosperity? No, it would bring about inflation, for the supply of money would suddenly exceed the supply of goods & services. Of course, the Mexicans would love such a system, but they would soon discover inflation, along with Mexican-style depletion & pollution of resources. I note that your Technocrats call themselves “North Americans.” This is a geographical location. As yet, there is no North American government, nor a North American political-economy, nor North American citizens. Presently, North America, which runs all the way to the Colombian border with Panama, including Central America, is divided into separate jurisdictions, with separate citizenships, such as Canadian, U.S.A., Mexican, &c. We know that the ZOG wants such an entity, but the massive illegal immigration into North America may cause disintegration before such an unwieldy amalgamation can come about.
Assuming that the Judeo-Freemasonic scheme of continental amalgamation is realized under a new Continental Congress, we should also assume that it would be under ZOG’s jew-banksters, as usual. This regime would preclude the Technocratic economic system by which purchasing power is distributed by head-count, rather than work performed.
Human inequality, as well as racial & cultural differences are ignored by the Technocrats, which invalidates their program from the outset. Who are they to tell people what is “enough,” for example? When the Zionist powers that be want more for themselves & less for the Goyim, will the Technocrats object? If they do object, how would they make the malefactors of great wealth behave? Nobody has done so in recorded history, least of all the Technocrats in a century of their existence! In their publication I see no new additions, only omissions, but thanks for a trip down Memory Lane!
In regard to the bible-banger-blather, prophecy is paralysis, for it discourages improved behavior. It is said that the Devil can quote scripture, so whenever I see scripture quoted, I know it’s the work of the Devil. Savitri Devi warned that other-worldly religions are bad because they discourage good people from striving to improve this world. As one writer said: “For Evil to triumph, it is only necessary that good men do nothing.”
In his “Civil War Two,” Thomas Chittum describes a race in which the ZOG promotes globalism against U.S. Patriotism, while the continent rapidly fills with hostile aliens who claim their turf. The race is between the forces of globalism versus the racial rivalries which will balkanize the U.S.A. & cause it to disintegrate. Unless there is a Change of Mind with Whites, we shall remain as spectators & as victims of these processes. Kennewick Man shows us that something similar has happened before on this continent, wherein Whites have been adulterated & then killed by Asians.
The artificiality you condemn, our separateness from Nature, are decreed by Judaism in all its anti-Nature forms, for Judaism claims that man is not part of Nature, so natural laws do not apply to man, who may deplete & pollute his environment as he chooses, on behalf of man’s multiplication, as commanded in the jew-book. The genocidal jew, Morgenthau, figured that the destruction of German industry would cause the deaths of two thirds of the German population quickly, & that the remainder could be sterilized. Ted Kaczinski (sp?) wanted to de-industrialize North America, with no limit to population. Without industry, such as factories, food processing & storage facilities, electricity, transport, farms, dairies, distribution centers such as food stores, water systems, sewage systems & treatment plants, public health & sanitation measures, the present population could not be maintained, let alone multiplied. In a Kaczinski state of Nature, the majority would starve from lack of food & die from drinking contaminated water. With ‘natural’ living conditions, a population would suffer the fate of armies in the U.S. Civil War, in which 9 died of disease for every soldier killed in battle. When troops camped out in one place for too long, their drinking water would become contaminated from human waste & disease would set in. Only a few may live off the land, as did the American Indians before the second arrival of the Europeans. As I understand, there are many more “Indians” now than there were before Columbus, so for people to live ‘naturally,’ immense numbers would first have to die. Man is ‘unnatural’ to a degree, for he must use his brain to survive. His teeth are too small to impress a tiger; he has no strength compared to a gorilla; his fur is too thin to withstand a winter; he is too slow to catch deer & antelope, & he is too puny even to slow down a buffalo. To exist, man invents, but he must limit the scope of his inventions & above all, limit his numbers if he wants to live on this planet much longer. Man’s duty to himself is to improve himself & to limit his numbers. If not, Nature will do so, for Nature is Nazi, & man is just another life-form among many. Man can never ‘defeat’ or ‘conquer’ Nature. All he can do is to find his place within the Natural Order, & behave himself accordingly. How simple, but how very difficult it is! All the best. DOWZ! & ORION!
Eric
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.