View Full Version : Jew filmmaker on trial for movies featuring beastiality & defecation
melcur
June 9th, 2008, 11:49 PM
Jewish swine, Ira Isaacs, filmmaker on trial for movies featuring beastiality & defecation (http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-obscene9-2008jun09,0,4510463.story)
yankee jane
June 9th, 2008, 11:57 PM
These filthy inbreds are a cancer wherever they exist.
But if jurors find that any of the four videos at issue in the case have any "literary, scientific or artistic value," the work is not legally obscene, according to a 1973 Supreme Court ruling.
It should be interesting to see if the jury finds any such "merits" in that filth...
.
Obadiah 1:18
June 9th, 2008, 11:57 PM
Give it a few more years and he'll probably receive an Oscar for them.
Sean Martin
June 10th, 2008, 12:20 AM
Re: melcur the REAL Commander of ANSWP
I wish you would cut and paste the story when you post. I trust you enough to not think you would post a fradulent link and feel the need to check up on you.
Oprichniki
June 10th, 2008, 12:27 AM
The anti-soul of the demon kike is never as obvious as in their "art."
melcur
June 10th, 2008, 12:47 AM
Re: melcur the REAL Commander of ANSWP
I wish you would cut and paste the story when you post. I trust you enough to not think you would post a fradulent link and feel the need to check up on you.
Well I'm glad you trust me. Has more to do with laziness than anything else. Although I think this particular story is important for lemmings to see and to understand we're talking about a kike, WNsts should know by now it's simply TJB and therefore quite predictable and boring.
If you want to see me getr excited and post an entire story, watch what happens when I come across one featuring the painful death of a hundred kikes.
Sean Martin
June 10th, 2008, 02:14 AM
Well I'm glad you trust me. Has more to do with laziness than anything else.
I am not being rude or anything just so you know. I have 56k and a lot of new sites have flash and high graphics that are murder to load on my computer. Sometimes I have to wait so long I just don’t even bother, I stopped reading just links a long time ago.
I like your posts, I would just like to see more of the post. :)
brutus
June 10th, 2008, 02:44 AM
Jew filmmaker on trial for movies featuring beastiality & defecation
Undoubtedly a jewish publicity stunt.
.
Jess_Smith
June 10th, 2008, 03:03 AM
For Doc:
Upcoming trial will see hours of hard-core fetish pornography
Francine Orr / Los Angeles Times
Ira Isaacs faces a trial on obscenity charges.
Ira Isaacs says his films, which feature bestiality and defecation, have artistic value. Federal prosecutors say they are criminally obscene. Hours of footage will help jurors decide who's right.
If all goes according to plan, an otherwise stately federal courtroom in downtown Los Angeles will be converted into a makeshift movie theater this week, screening a series of graphic -- many would say vulgar -- sexual fetish videos.
At issue is how a jury will define obscenity in a region that boasts its status as the capital of the pornography industry and at a time when technology has made the taboo adult flicks of a generation ago available to a mainstream audience.
Hollywood filmmaker Ira Isaacs says the videos he sells are works of art, protected under the Constitution. Federal prosecutors contend they are criminally obscene.
The prosecution is the first in Southern California by a U.S. Department of Justice task force formed in 2005 after Christian conservative groups appealed to the Bush administration to crack down on smut.
For jurors to determine whether Isaacs' work is obscene, they will view hours of hard-core pornography so degrading that in one film, an actress cries throughout, prosecutors said in court papers.
But if jurors find that any of the four videos at issue in the case have any "literary, scientific or artistic value," the work is not legally obscene, according to a 1973 Supreme Court ruling.
"All they're going to do is turn on a DVD machine and hope the jury is going to be so shocked and disgusted and offended that they're going to throw me in prison," said Isaacs, 57, a native of the Bronx. He said he hopes that jurors will be shocked -- he's a self-described "shock artist" -- but also that they will see artistic value in the work.
The portly defendant, who sports a ponytail and goatee, produced and starred in one of the videos. He contends that the sex in the movie is incidental to the art. It's merely a marketing tool to drive sales of the videos on the Internet, he said.
In a statistic that some may find every bit as shocking as his work, Isaacs said he was selling about 1,000 videos per month at $30 apiece before being raided by the FBI early last year. The number has since dropped to between 700 and 800 per month, but they still generate enough money to pay the rent on a house with a pool in the Hollywood Hills.
Isaacs predicted that many jurors would not be able to stomach viewing the movies, some of which feature acts of bestiality and defecation.
"It's going to be a circus," he said of the upcoming trial. "I think I'd freak out if I had to watch six hours of the stuff."
Jury selection is expected to begin today. Presiding over the trial will be Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Kozinski was assigned the case as part of a rotation in which he and other appeals court judges occasionally oversee criminal trials in addition to deciding appeals.
His involvement in the case may be a stroke of luck for Isaacs. That is because Kozinski is seen as a staunch defender of free speech. When he learned that there were filters banning pornography and other materials from computers in the appeals court's Pasadena offices, he led a successful effort to have the filters removed.
"I did some rabble-rousing about it," Kozinski said in a brief interview last week. He said he was made aware of the issue when a law clerk researching a case was banned from accessing a gay bookstore's website.
"I didn't think the bureaucrats in Washington should decide what the federal judiciary should have access to," the judge said. "I thought that was incredibly arrogant for them to decide on their own."
Kozinski declined to comment on any aspect of the Isaacs case.
Isaacs said he would testify as his own expert witness at trial and planned to lecture jurors on how perceptions of art have changed over the years. There was a time, he said, when the works of authors James Joyce and D.H. Lawrence were called obscene.
The point, Isaacs said, "is do we really want to throw artists in jail in America?"
Kenneth Whitted, the Justice Department prosecutor assigned to the Obscenity Prosecution Task Force, declined to be interviewed for this report.
According to the Justice Department's website, the task force "is dedicated exclusively to the protection of America's children and families through the enforcement of our Nation's obscenity laws."
melcur
June 10th, 2008, 03:11 AM
Obscenity will eventually be defined as "the truth," and anything else, including fagdom and beastiality will be expressions of art.
I look forward to the end; God please give me the opportunity to take at least 3 Zogbots with me.
Sean Martin
June 10th, 2008, 03:56 AM
I look forward to the end; God please give me the opportunity to take at least 3 Zogbots with me.
I hope you don’t mean white zogbots. I am amazed at the atheist racists that shout kill all the jews then linger on with death and have a completely un eventful death. I think even the most hardened atheists start thinking spiritually when death is immanent.
confederate
June 10th, 2008, 06:42 AM
"If I get convicted and go to prison now," Isaacs said, "I go as an artist."
horseshit!! there is no such thing as a jewish artist. so this asshole thinks his "art" should be on display in the louve? give me an effin break. he should be hanging by his balls.
melcur
June 10th, 2008, 09:14 AM
I hope you don’t mean white zogbots. I am amazed at the atheist racists that shout kill all the jews then linger on with death and have a completely un eventful death. I think even the most hardened atheists start thinking spiritually when death is immanent.
"Imminent."
Can you give me one example?
What makes you think I'm an atheist?
Sean Martin
June 11th, 2008, 01:47 AM
"Imminent."
Can you give me one example?
What makes you think I'm an atheist?
Actually just the first part (about whites) was directed at you. The rest was just my thoughts on Wnism in general. :)
The reason I mentioned atheists is because there is nothing from a spiritual standpoint to stop them from harming another. I know Christian racists have done the same thing. Also I believe most people start to think spiritually in the face of death. I have met one person that was a hardened atheist and continued to be so even when death was certain.
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 01:29 PM
http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/8194/39763069cq9.jpg
Ira Isaacs
Ira E. Isaacs (DOB 1951)
8523 Brier Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90046
Info on property:
Two bedrooms, three bathrooms, single story
Built in 1935
Renovated in 1970
1740 square feet
0.12 acre lot
Purchased in 1995 for $110,000
Current estimated value: $995,000
Safety rating for neighborhood:
Our safety score is 1.5 out of 10 for this jurisdiction.
Crime here is about 70% higher than usual for the LA area.
(I take this to mean that if Ira Isaacs is found face down in the dirt, with a freshly ventilated head, this would probably be attributed to TSB/TNB.)
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 01:53 PM
Alex A. Kozinski, Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit (DOB 23/7/1950)
33 Marguerite Drive
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
310-265-4653
310-541-5885
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/5696/alex20kozinski20eugene2ib5.jpg
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/3479/20080408alexkozinski2ri0.jpg
Kozinski was born 1950 in Bucharest, Romania but his parents, both Holocaust survivors, brought him to America in 1962 when he was 12. They settled in Los Feliz, Los Angeles and his father, Moses, ran a small grocery store there.
Case dismissed. http://www.woodlandbeach.us/animated_gavel.gif
Itz_molecular
June 11th, 2008, 02:27 PM
Ira E. Isaacs (DOB 1951)
8523 Brier Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90046
Info on property:
Two bedrooms, three bathrooms, single story
Built in 1935
Renovated in 1970
1740 square feet
0.12 acre lot
Purchased in 1995 for $110,000
Current estimated value: $995,000
Safety rating for neighborhood:
Our safety score is 1.5 out of 10 for this jurisdiction.
Crime here is about 70% higher than usual for the LA area.
(I take this to mean that if Ira Isaacs is found face down in the dirt, with a freshly ventilated head, this would probably be attributed to TSB/TNB.)
Not his REAL residence , just a cover house he uses for a dummy address .( I strongly suspect , especially now that his name is in the public media ).
Itz_molecular
June 11th, 2008, 02:31 PM
Kozinski was born 1950 in Bucharest, Romania but his parents, both Holocaust survivors, brought him to America in 1962 when he was 12. They settled in Los Feliz, Los Angeles and his father, Moses, ran a small grocery store there.
Where they ran numbers , made book and distributed porn ( when it was illegal ).
Grocery stores , restaurants and other retail fronts make the ideal cover for illegal operations .
Schnee Weiss
June 11th, 2008, 02:43 PM
Purchased in 1995 for $110,000
Current estimated value: $995,000
Safety rating for neighborhood:
Our safety score is 1.5 out of 10 for this jurisdiction.
Crime here is about 70% higher than usual for the LA area.
But yet the house is worth $995,000?! WTF?
Itz_molecular
June 11th, 2008, 03:15 PM
But yet the house is worth $995,000?! WTF?
Seems high to me , also . Even for crazy california. ( Not now , that I have looked at a map )
It's in the Hollywood hills just north of Sunset Blvd , that would explain much of it . 995K is probably just the knock-down value of the lot.
I suspect that is his 'studio' . Very convenient ! He can pick up runaway girls on Sunset or Hollywood Blvd . Take them to Brier , get em high or drugged on rohypnol and do the beast filming . Plus , there are plenty of prostitutes on Sunset and Hollywood , if he has to resort to paying for the show .
The crime stats are misleading . The neighborhoods north of Sunset are much safer than those south of Sunset . The 'average' is probably derived from very bifurcated crime stats .
News
June 11th, 2008, 03:51 PM
Undoubtedly a jewish publicity stunt. I'm suspicious of that too. They rarely come out WORSE off after these things happen.
Just need one jew, faggot, or feeble mind on that jury and this will be "art". Plus the article hints that this judge is exactly who he needs.
In a statistic that some may find every bit as shocking as his work, Isaacs said he was selling about 1,000 videos per month at $30 apiece before being raided by the FBI early last year. The number has since dropped to between 700 and 800 per month, but they still generate enough money to pay the rent on a house with a pool in the Hollywood Hills. Publicity isn't the only possibility, I suppose. The tribe will sometimes curb the more compromising activities of a member. In extreme cases like Irv Rubin and his very poorly timed bomb plotting(way too close to 9/11), they may even snuff him out.
Here you have a jew, with easy jewish face and name, personally producing, selling, and sometimes even "acting" in some of the worst sort of pornography that can me made. No layers of plausible deniability. It's all coming straight from his hands and the money is going straight back to him.
Not good for jews.
Sean Martin
June 11th, 2008, 03:52 PM
Two bedrooms, three bathrooms, single story
Built in 1935
Why would anyone want 3 bathrooms in a 2-bedroom home? Usually there is one bathroom for every 2 bedrooms max and never more bathrooms than bedrooms.
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 04:00 PM
Looks like this kikenpervert is reading this very thread! :D
http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/trials/shit-happened/
Shit Happened: Scat Porn Trial Begins
by Steven Mikulan
June 10, 2008 11:24 PM
....
Isaacs, in fact, maintains a noticeable sense of humor for a man facing five years of prison time for each of the four counts.
“Hey, last night I found a Nazi Web site that calls me a ‘Jew filmmaker,’” he chuckled in his New York accent. In person Isaacs appears as both a soulful and cunning figure -- part Times Square barker and part misunderstood artist.
Hey Ira, why don't you sign up to the forum and let us know just how wonderful it feels for a jew to become a multi-millionaire by literally shitting on the goyim.
Hollywood Scat Amateurs No. 8 (Roxy Does Shit)
Order#: 1214
Time: 60 Minutes
Quality: Excellent
Scatmovies Exclusive
Stolen Car films presents it's newest and sexiest Toilet Princess. Meet Roxy. This hot little number seems to really enjoy all kinds of scat play. Watch as she smears her hard body with steamy shit, puts it in her mouth and licks it from bowls, plates and spoons. For her explosive finale, she takes a man's enema into her mouth as he sits on her face leaving her writhing with pleasure. Do not miss the debut video of this, Stolen Car's hottest young star.
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 04:04 PM
Why would anyone want 3 bathrooms in a 2-bedroom home? Usually there is one bathroom for every 2 bedrooms max and never more bathrooms than bedrooms.
Judging by what he does for a living, I'm surprised he doesn't have even MORE bathrooms. LOL
Itz_molecular
June 11th, 2008, 04:12 PM
Why would anyone want 3 bathrooms in a 2-bedroom home? Usually there is one bathroom for every 2 bedrooms max and never more bathrooms than bedrooms.
Most likely transposed numbers , really 3/2 . 3 bdrm 2 bath.
If you saw most of what works in LA county offices , you'd understand how the numbers were entered incorrectly .
Itz_molecular
June 11th, 2008, 04:16 PM
I hope those photos are faked wi chocolate icing and cake mix ( often is ).
Even if that , it is still really sick .
News
June 11th, 2008, 04:24 PM
Hey Ira, I was looking at the glazed, sleepy eyes of the prostitutes in the images above, and I was wondering how that goes. Does a boss like yourself just give them a quiet place to shoot up before filming, or is your role more active? Is there a certain combination of pills that's proven useful? Does she take care of herself and indulge her usual habit, or does she need some help?
How do you artists do it? And what do the hookers charge?
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 04:49 PM
YouTube - Dirty Deeds
odin
June 11th, 2008, 04:54 PM
Why would anyone want 3 bathrooms in a 2-bedroom home? Usually there is one bathroom for every 2 bedrooms max and never more bathrooms than bedrooms.
I can't speak for this guy's 2 bedroom house, but many large homes of the well-to-do have more bathrooms than bedrooms. Read some of the home descriptions of Hollywood stars. Usually, it's 4 bedroom, 6 bath...or a similar ratio.
http://realestate.yahoo.com/Florida/Hollywood/Homes_for_sale/result.html;_ylt=AqWjIcP09LawogiY7cghHlOkF7kF?typeBak=realestate&p=Hollywood%2C+FL&type=classified&priceLow=&priceHigh=&bedroomLow=4&bathroomLow=4.0&search=Search&redir=1
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 05:12 PM
http://www.maderatribune.com/news/newsview.asp?c=245269
Obscenity case nauseates potential jurors
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
By The Associated Press - Linda Deutsch
http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/527/0611apobscenityorartrn7.jpg
Ira Isaacs, left, with his attorney Roger Jon Diamond
LOS ANGELES - What violates community obscenity standards in the nation's reputed pornography capital? Federal prosecutors think they have a case.
Ira Isaacs readily admits he produced and sold movies depicting bestiality and sexual activity involving feces and urine. The judge warned potential jurors that the hours of fetish videos included violence against women, and many of them said they don't want to serve because watching would make them sick to their stomachs.
"It's the most extreme material that's ever been put on trial. I don't know of anything more disgusting," said Roger Jon Diamond - Isaacs' own defense attorney.
The case is the most visible effort of a new federal task force designed to crack down on smut in America. Isaacs, however, says his work is an extreme but constitutionally protected form of art.
"There's no question the stuff is disgusting," said Diamond, who has spent much of his career representing pornographers. "The question is should we throw people in jail for it?"
Isaacs, 57, a Los Angeles advertising agency owner who says he used to market fine art in commercial projects, calls himself a "shock artist" and says he went into distributing and producing films about fetishes because "I wanted to do something extreme."
"I'm fighting for art," he said in an interview before his federal trial got under way. "Art is on trial."
He plans to testify as his own expert witness and said he will cite the historic battles over obscenity involving authors James Joyce and D.H. Lawrence.
One of his exhibits, he said, will be a painting of a urinal by famed artist Marcel Duchamp.
Diamond said Isaacs also will tell jurors the works have therapeutic value for people with the same fetishes depicted on screen.
"They don't feel so isolated," Diamond said. "They have fetishes that other people have."
Isaacs makes a brief appearance in one of the videos he produced; others that he distributed were imported from other countries.
The business has been lucrative. At one point, he has said, he was selling 1,000 videos a month at $30 apiece. Then his office was raided by FBI agents who bought his videos online with undercover credit cards.
The government obtained an indictment against Isaacs on a variety of obscenity charges, including importation or transportation of obscene material for sale. Prosecutors have declined to comment about the case.
Jean Rosenbluth, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at University of Southern California, said such prosecutions were rare until the creation of the U.S. Department of Justice Obscenity Prosecution Task Force. Child pornography cases are handled by a separate unit.
"The problem with obscenity is no one really knows what it is," she said. "It's relatively simple to paint something as an artistic effort even if it's offensive."
The test of obscenity still hinges on a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling which held that a work is not legally obscene if it has "literary, artistic, political or scientific value."
Jurors also are asked to determine whether the material in question violates standards of what is acceptable to the community at large.
"This task force was quite controversial and many in the Department of Justice felt that it was a waste of resources," Rosenbluth said. "Because of the pressure, they seem to have chosen the worst cases they can find to prosecute."
Each of the six counts against Isaacs carries a five-year maximum prison sentence. Prosecutors also are seeking forfeiture of assets obtained through his video sales.
"A lot of this is about sending a message - 'Don't make this stuff. Don't put it on the Internet. We don't want it here,"' Rosenbluth said.
Rosenbluth said prosecutors would be emboldened to pursue similar cases if Isaacs is convicted, though there would be lengthy challenges on appeal.
In an unusual twist, the trial is being presided over by the chief judge of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Alex Kozinski, under a program that allows appellate judges to occasionally handle criminal trials at the District Court level. Kozinski is known as a strong defender of free speech and First Amendment rights.
When jury selection began Monday, he urged prospects to be open about their opinions and incurred an onslaught of negative statements. Within the first hour, he dismissed 26 men and women who said they could not be fair to the defendant because they were repulsed by the subject matter. By day's end, half the panel of 100 had been excused.
"I think watching something like that would make me physically ill, nauseous," said one woman. "It's affecting me physically now just thinking about it."
One man fired angry comments at the ponytailed Isaacs.
"Hearing stuff about feces made me sick and the defendant looks like my ex-business partner who did some of these things. He looks guilty as sin to me," said the man. "It turns my stomach thinking about it."
Several prospects marched up to the judge's bench for private conferences when he told them that the films also involved violence against women. They, too, were excused, as were several who cited their religious beliefs.
Asked how long they would have to watch the movies, Kozinski told them it would be about five hours and "I will be there watching with you. This is part of the job we're doing."
News
June 11th, 2008, 05:18 PM
Oy, vatta face! A living caricature. Hope the gov collapses soon so its easier to make these disappear.
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 05:23 PM
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-kozinski12-2008jun12,0,6220192.story?track=rss
9th Circuit's chief judge posted sexually explicit matter on his website
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/7264/39868411hs5.jpg
Judge Alex Kozinski, now chief of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, during a 2003 hearing in San Francisco.
Alex Kozinski, who is presiding over an obscenity trial in L.A., acknowledges that he had posted sexually explicit photos and videos. He says he didn't think the public could access the site.
By Scott Glover, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
10:28 AM PDT, June 11, 2008
» Discuss Article (143 Comments)
One of the highest-ranking federal judges in the United States, who is currently presiding over an obscenity trial in Los Angeles, has maintained his own publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos.
Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, acknowledged in an interview with The Times that he had posted the materials, which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal. Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as "funny."
Kozinski, 57, said that he thought the site was for his private storage and that he was not aware the images could be seen by the public, although he also said he had shared some material on the site with friends. After the interview Tuesday evening, he blocked public access to the site.
Asked whether the contents of his site should force him to step aside from the pending obscenity trial, Kozinski declined to comment. Opening statements in the trial are scheduled for this morning. In the case, Ira Isaacs, a filmmaker based in Los Angeles, is accused of distributing criminally obscene sexual-fetish videos depicting bestiality and defecation.
Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor who specializes in legal ethics, told The Times that Kozinski should recuse himself from the Isaacs case because "the public can reasonably question his objectivity" concerning the issues at hand.
Gillers, who has known Kozinski for years and called him "a treasure of the federal judiciary," said he took the judge at his word that he did not know the site was publicly available. But he said Kozinski was "seriously negligent" in allowing it to be discovered.
"The phrase 'sober as a judge' resonates with the American public," Gillers said. "We don't want them to reveal their private selves publicly. This is going to upset a lot of people."
Gillers said the disclosure would be humiliating for Kozinski and would "harm his reputation in many quarters," but that the controversy should die there.
He added, however, that if the public concludes the website was intended for the sharing of pornographic material, "that's a transgression of another order."
"It would be very hard for him to come back from that," he said.
Kozinski said he would delete some material from his site, including the photo depicting women as cows, which he said was "degrading . . . and just gross." He also said he planned to get rid of a graphic step-by-step pictorial in which a woman is seen shaving her pubic hair.
Kozinski said he must have accidentally uploaded those images to his server while intending to upload something else. "I would not keep those files intentionally," he said. The judge pointed out that he never used appeals court computers to maintain the site.
The sexually explicit material on Kozinski's site earlier this week was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches as seen through snug fitting clothing or underwear. There were also themes of defecation and urination, though they are not presented in a sexual context.
Kozinski, who was named chief judge of the 9th Circuit last year, is considered a judicial conservative on most issues. He was appointed to the federal bench by then-President Ronald Reagan in 1985. He has a national reputation for a brilliant legal mind and has developed a reputation as a champion of the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and expression. Several year ago, for example, after learning that appeals court administrators had placed filters on computers that denied access to pornography and other materials, Kozinski led a successful effort to have the filters removed.
The judge said it was strictly by chance that he wound up presiding over the Issacs trial in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. Appeals court judges occasionally hear criminal cases when they have free time on their calendars and the Isaacs case was one of two he was given, the judge said.
Kozinski said he didn't think any of the material he posted on his website would qualify as obscene.
"Is it prurient? I don't know what to tell you," he said. "I think it's odd and interesting. It's part of life."
Before the site was taken down, visitors to http://alex.kozinski.com were greeted with the message: "Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre."
Only those who knew to type in the name of a subdirectory could see the content on the site, which also included some of Kozinski's essays and legal writings as well as music files and personal photos.
The judge said he began saving the sexually explicit materials and other items of interest years ago.
"People send me stuff like this all the time," he said.
He keeps the things he finds interesting or funny with the thought that he might later pass them on to friends, he said.
scott.glover@latimes.com
Times staff writers Ben Welsh and Eric Ulken contributed to this report.
News
June 11th, 2008, 05:59 PM
Good pic of Kozinski. Jewish or mostly jewish.
Quite a coincidence here. Jew pornographer who promotes bestiality and scat gets jewish judge who likes bestiality and scat.
Fuck it, Brutus was right. This is a show, and an advertisement.
Herman van Houten
June 11th, 2008, 06:52 PM
What do you know, a kike animal porn/scat porn lover is playing judge in the trial of another kike animal porn/scat porn lover! Kike whore Starr will have a hard time deciding which one of these jews she will suck first!
These kikes will triple their income from selling their kike porn "art" because of all the free publicity. Part of the profits will go to Israel to pay for movies that are (still) illegal, like child porn and snuff porn.
Herman van Houten
June 11th, 2008, 06:57 PM
The kike judge already rigged the trial by kicking everyone off the jury who found animal/scat/sadistic/kike porn revolting.
JimInCO
June 11th, 2008, 08:14 PM
YouTube - Kozinski on the Dating Game
Itz_molecular
June 11th, 2008, 08:22 PM
I can't speak for this guy's 2 bedroom house, but many large homes of the well-to-do have more bathrooms than bedrooms. Read some of the home descriptions of Hollywood stars. Usually, it's 4 bedroom, 6 bath...or a similar ratio.
http://realestate.yahoo.com/Florida/Hollywood/Homes_for_sale/result.html;_ylt=AqWjIcP09LawogiY7cghHlOkF7kF?typeBak=realestate&p=Hollywood%2C+FL&type=classified&priceLow=&priceHigh=&bedroomLow=4&bathroomLow=4.0&search=Search&redir=1
His isn't large , < 1800 sq ft on a 1/8 acre lot , built in the 30's. The only real expensive thing about the house is the location . Put it somewhere in Ohio , it would be worth 60,000 .
News
June 11th, 2008, 10:54 PM
The jud(g)e: http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2004/feature_bazelon_janfeb04.msp
Both parents "Holocaust(tm) survivors" :)
Big VNN fan Eugene Volokh clerked for him, co-wrote chutzpathic essays like "Lawsuit, Shmawsuit", itself about how the word "chutzpah" is commonly used in judicial opinions.
His father Moses, a "staunch communist", became a staunch republican when he settled in California.
The sort of stuff you'd expect.
JimInCO
June 12th, 2008, 01:16 AM
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h3YrphWBHw1j30UUB9VLtw5pBkOQD918A4B80
LA obscenity trial suspended over judge's Web site
By GREG RISLING – 52 minutes ago
PASADENA, Calif. (AP) — A federal judge overseeing a case exploring the extreme fringe of pornography suspended the obscenity trial on Wednesday after a newspaper reported he had posted sexually explicit photos and videos on his own Web site.
Judge Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, granted a joint prosecution and defense motion to suspend the trial after prosecutors said they needed time to look into the issue. The jury was ordered to return on Monday.
"I'm not going to say anything. The trial is ongoing," Kozinski told a reporter as he left.
The suspension came after jurors spent hours at the Pasadena offices of the 9th Circuit watching videos of bestiality and extreme fetishes that are evidence in the trial of Ira Isaacs, a Los Angeles businessman who sold them.
Kozinski indicated to the attorneys he would be willing to recuse himself but noted that the trial had already begun and jurors had already seen two of the graphic movies.
Earlier, as the jury was hearing opening statements in a Los Angeles courtroom, the Los Angeles Times reported on its Web site that Kozinski had posted sexual material on his Web site and then blocked access after being interviewed about it Tuesday evening.
...
The_skunk
June 12th, 2008, 11:56 AM
Are Jews really 'Human Garbage'?
http://home.att.net/~kimmel_a/Master_Israel/kidwe.jpg
Maybe these arab kids are snipers and the Jew is defending himself? As for the judge, I wonder if he was the same Jewish judge caught wearing a penis pump during trials?
I think Jews like Woody Allen (f*** his 7 yr old daughter), or Fritzl the Dungeon Master, or Leopold and Loeb (murdered a 14 yr old and then molested the corpse) are just aberations.
Akingu
June 12th, 2008, 05:19 PM
14!
sean(doc)martin wrote:>>>I hope you don’t mean white zogbots.
ANY and ALL zogbots need re-programmed or destroyed. There's degrees of lemmingness so we need to decide which can be re-educated vs those who are a complete waste of sperm.
>>>> I am amazed at the atheist racists that shout kill all the jews then linger on with death and have a completely un eventful death.
What is that supposed to mean? As an atheistic Heathen, I'd like to see some specification. An uneventful death could be a good thing. Better than some of the options out there, like shark attack, burning alive, AIDS.... Personally, I'd like to go smothered to death between Heather Locklears thighs. After that? Who gives a sh*t? :D
>>> I think even the most hardened atheists start thinking spiritually when death is immanent.
Have as few regrets as possible. You see, I live my life like there's no tomorrow. I try to be happy, make a positive impact on at least ONE persons life. As a former soldier, I learned to make all the little things count. To go down fighting is the best way to die. Hyped up on adrenaline, invincible, pissed-off, mother-f**king berserk.
If you really want to read some interesting stuff, read "Liber Null and Psychonaut" by Peter Carroll or articles on Subjective/Creative Universes by Michael Aquino. Crowley also touched on it in several writings in "Book 4". Upon death, ones soul/ka/ba/spirit enters a universe that you, yourself, have created.
>>>>he reason I mentioned atheists is because there is nothing from a spiritual standpoint to stop them from harming another.
What stops so-called xtians from harming each other? Jack Sh*t and Jack left town. That's no argument. It comes down to personal morals, ethics and values.
Just my .02 worth.
A88
John Creagh
June 12th, 2008, 05:59 PM
Only those who knew to type in the name of a subdirectory could see the content on the site, which also included some of Kozinski's essays and legal writings as well as music files and personal photos.
The judge said he began saving the sexually explicit materials and other items of interest years ago.
Does anyone know if this subdirectory would have been copied by the Wayback machine? Would the photographs be accessible? It would be great if these photos could be retrieved and spread all over the internet to discredit this pervert kike judge, maybe even generating enough pressure on him to resign.
The archive appears to have picked up changes to the website on November 29, 2004 and January 22, 2005, which may indicate it copied changes to the subdirectory at that time.
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.alex.kozinski.com
Everyone copy these pages before access to them is blocked.
JimInCO
June 14th, 2008, 02:18 AM
Judge declares mistrial in LA obscenity case
By LINDA DEUTSCH – 6 hours ago
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal judge under scrutiny for posting sexually explicit material on his own Web site declared a mistrial Friday in an obscenity trial over which he was presiding.
Judge Alex Kozinski said he would ask that the case be assigned to another judge.
Kozinski is chief judge of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals but was serving as a trial judge in a federal obscenity prosecution of a man who distributed videos showing bestiality and extreme fetishes.
"In light of the public controversy surrounding my involvement in this case, I have concluded that there is a manifest necessity to declare a mistrial," Kozinski wrote in his order.
The material Kozinski had on his Web site included photos of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and of a man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal, according to the Los Angeles Times, which first reported about the images in a Wednesday story. The extreme pornography at the center of the trial depicted extreme fetishes, including bestiality, violence against women and sexual activity involving feces and urine.
The postings on the judge's Web site came to light earlier this week when opening statements were under way. The trial was suspended Wednesday after jurors had already watched some of the videos.
Kozinski on Thursday asked an ethics panel of the 9th Circuit to investigate his own conduct and pledged to cooperate fully. He also asked the circuit's judicial council to ask Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to assign the inquiry to a panel of judges outside the 9th Circuit's jurisdiction of nine western states.
Kozinski did the right thing in declaring a mistrial and removing himself, said Stephen Gillers, a New York University School of Law professor who is an expert on judicial ethics.
"Those of us who know him know that he could have tried this case fairly, but the public would have thought the court system had lost its marbles if Kozinski had stayed on the case," Gillers said.
In the obscenity case, the U.S. Department of Justice is prosecuting Ira Isaacs, 57, on four counts, including importation or transportation of obscene material for sale. He faces a maximum of 20 years in prison and forfeiture of assets if convicted.
Defense attorney Roger Jon Diamond said he was very upset about the mistrial and was considering his options.
He said it was unclear whether the case could proceed with the same jury and a new judge.
Diamond accused the Department of Justice of "intimidating Judge Kozinski into doing this." Justice Department attorneys are trying the case.
"We all have to be nervous and concerned when the executive branch can do this to anybody, including the sitting federal appeals judge," Diamond said.
Department of Justice spokeswoman Laura Sweeney in Washington, D.C., declined to comment on any aspect of the case.
Diamond said there had been meetings with the prosecutor, Justice Department lawyer Kenneth Whitted, and with Brent D. Ward, the head of the government obscenity task force, since the controversy erupted.
"I made a proposal for a stipulated mistrial, providing the retrial would not take place until early next year and that was flatly rejected by Mr. Whitted and Mr. Ward," Diamond said. "They wanted to disqualify Kozinski and go ahead immediately with the same jury and a new judge Monday morning."
Diamond said he was certain jurors knew of the controversy but he had favored allowing the trial to proceed with Kozinski presiding, rather than simply changing judges.
"If we were to come back to court with a new judge, it would send a message to the jury that Judge Kozinski did something wrong, which is not true. The jury would get the impression that something naughty had occurred, which is not the case."
Cyrus Sanai, a Beverly Hills lawyer who has had a long-running dispute with the 9th Circuit, told The Associated Press he discovered the sexual content while monitoring the judge's Web site in December. Sanai said he downloaded the files then started contacting reporters to bring attention to what he called widespread ethical problems on the 9th Circuit.
Walt Whiteman
July 11th, 2008, 10:39 PM
“If I get convicted and go to prison now,” Isaacs said, “I go as an artist.”
This is what makes jews the biggest assholes of all. They cannot just call themselves pornographers, they have to be "artists."
Jews cannot thrive in an immoral society, it has to be amoral where they completeley lower the moral tone altogether. An in an immoral society, they would be seen as the source of all that immorality. This "Ira-Issaacs" of course sees of himself as a solider of his race in this crusade. Much like the Arab bombers do.
Jews are simply Arabs who have inbred for 1 million years.
Kaiser
July 11th, 2008, 11:03 PM
TJB!
All kikes behave the same way, there's no difference between spielberg or Isaccs!
Fuck 'em all!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.