Lars Redoubt
July 22nd, 2008, 12:47 AM
SOME PERSPECTIVES ON GUERRILLA WARFARE
by E. Thomson
As a former conventional soldier, one could envy the guerrillero for many things. He was able to travel light, for his food & sometimes his weapons were supplied by local supporters among his people. He enjoyed superb intelligence, for his eyes were with his people, wherever they were. He could choose his terrain & his time to fight. If he were wounded, he could rely upon his people to care for him.
For the conventional soldier, it was pretty much the opposite. Whatever one needed was carried on one’s back, including food & weapons. He had to gather his own intelligence in usually neutral or hostile circumstances, & he had to maintain contact with H.Q. for their intelligence, & hope it was up to date. H.Q. sent orders for one to fight on THEIR time & terrain, & often the enemy would choose the time & terrain least favorable for you to fight. After all, that was the enemy’s job, but sometime it was difficult to distinguish H.Q. from the enemy. If wounded, the soldier hoped a medic were with his unit, & that he could be rapidly evacuated to a suitable dressing station or even a hospital.
Above all, the soldier maintains a certain distance between himself & the local population. The guerrilleros did the opposite, for they were OF the population. As a sentry I was ordered to let no one get close enough to seize my weapon or otherwise put me out of action. I notice how U.S. police have become militarized, & now behave like an alien occupation force: Present, but distant, with a tendency to treat the citizens as if they were enemies. Warfare is part of government, whether it be warfare against one’s own people or against ‘foreigners.’ The choice of strategy & tactics occur within an economic, demographic & political context, i.e. reality, rather than wishful-thinking.
In all forms of warfare we must ask “Cui bono?” Who benefits from a conflict? What are the objectives of war, with its destruction & terrorism? Who, in fact, is our enemy? In former Rhodesia, Ian Smith, our Prime Minister, had sold out to the Marxist enemy, long before his official handover to the Black Reds in 1980. In regions where I was stationed, local Whites informed me that an unofficial truce existed between government forces whom I represented & the “terrs” (terrorists). A local chief had made the deal, as I understood, & the Smith regime’s behavior strongly indicated its support for the enemy, in the peaceful areas I encountered. The “fix” was obviously in, while good Whites were sacrificed to lull the population into believing that the sellout had not occurred. Ian Smith so loved the Blacks that he handed them over to Robert Mugabe. How ironic. Too bad for the Blacks.
Ideology in warfare is usually adapted to circumstances. Marxism was designed for industrial workers, not for rural peasants. According to Marxists with whom I’ve spoken, the “workers’ paradise” was supposed to blossom in Germany, certainly not Russia or China! Since Marxism was jewish, the kosher Khazars used its universalist message to cloak their tribal conquest of the Russian Empire. The Chinese jew Soong banksters funded both Chiang & Mao, as an experiment to see who’d win. Like true jews, they cared not a whit for the millions of Chinese Goyim who’d bear the brunt of either regime. The Soongs would win, regardless, as they have been doing.
Chalmers Johnson wrote a good account of change in China, whose rulers wanted to enjoy White technology, so as to keep the White invaders out. Chiang adopted ideas from the West, including the USA, whereas Mao adopted Marxism via Moscow. Johnson describes Mao’s need to abandon the cities & their few ‘workers’ in favor of fleeing into the vast rural areas, where the majority of the Chinese were. Thus, Mao had to learn guerrilla warfare on the double, for his forces were beset by Chiang’s more numerous, better trained & better armed forces. Mao’s rescuers came in the unlikely form of Japanese invaders, who easily defeated Chiang’s forces in conventional battles, for the Japanese had adopted the latest White military technology & knew how to use it, very well. Chiang retreated to distant, defensible areas, & abandoned a large territory to Mao, the Japanese & their puppet warlords. The Japs were not running a popularity contest, for their idea of conquering territory was to terrorize the population by killing as many as they encountered. This tactic played into Mao’s hands, for he could finally talk to the arch-conservative peasants with words to the effect: The Japanese will come to kill you, regardless of anything you do or don’t do. Since you have nothing to lose, you might as well fight them. We’ll show you how. Hence, the Maoists became teachers, & thus leaders, who gained the respect of the peasants. Prior to the Jap-attack, Maoists had been deemed ‘foreigners’ with crazy ideas. With Chiang out of the picture, Mao was able to organize his movement & build its strength, so the Japs would have to come in large groups or not at all, as the Spaniards had done in Cuba & the U.S. forces did in Vietnam. Large troop movements give the enemy plenty of warning, & American motorized movements gave advance fanfare, so their opponents had lots of time for concealment & ambush arrangements.
The British in Malaya, & the Whites in Rhodesia found small units, moving quickly, to be most effective in defeating guerrilleros on the move. These 5-man ‘sticks’ would pursue the enemy constantly, & they would be replaced or reinforced by air, so the enemy had no chance to rest, & often little time in which to set up ambushes for rearguard purposes. The White man’s radio also came in handy, although drums are more romantic in jungle settings. Certainly, small unit actions are effective against similar enemy units, but such combat is not easy, & requires highly-skilled & motivated people who are also very fit. Thus, regimes which are ‘in’ can use similar tactics to regimes which are ‘out’.
Deception, the god of the Israeli Mossad, is one of the factors which makes war an art. Psychology plays an important role in the effectiveness of tactics, including deception, as with the placement of landmines & boobytraps. Another use of deception occurs in false flag operations such as the failed attack on the USS Liberty & the successful attack on 9-11. In Latin America, mainly Colombia, where I worked for 2 years, I experienced a few false flag ops in which my residence was bombed by the USA or its Colombian puppets. The bombs at U.S. premises were not particularly destructive, & they served as pretexts for the government to round up persons whom they did not like. Colombia’s 300 year old civil war was sporadic, bloody, & popularly known as “la violencia,” “the violence,” which was omnipresent. I joked that silence just meant a pause to reload. When I saw dead bodies here & there, or someone killed with the slice of a machete, I didn’t know if these victims were outcomes of personal animosities or political differences. The second week after my arrival in Cali, newspapers reported the beheading of 52 civilians on the highway to Bogotá. Allegedly, bandits disguised as soldiers had set up a roadblock & herded passengers & drivers from trucks, buses & cars behind a hut, where they were beheaded by the usual machetes. Later, as I became more familiar with Colombian conditions, I wondered if the bandits were not really Colombian troops using deception to cast blame on their opponents. This tactic is also called a black op. Generally, the ‘bandits’ carried more modern weapons than did the Colombian Army, but I was not on the scene, & my head remains intact & in place as a result. Guerrilleros were also accused of killing hospital patients & staff in rural areas, for reasons inscrutable, if not suspicious.
Just as Mao had to revise Marxist tactics to fit his circumstances, Che Guevara was defeated by using Maoist tactics in Bolivia, by going to the countryside, where the people were NOT. He seems to have been betrayed by his Moscow contacts who tipped off Moscow which tipped off the USA, which tipped off the Bolivian Army to chase Guevara’s group until they were killed or captured. Apparently, Moscow wanted no more Cubas, & I read official statements to that effect in bankster publications like the Rockefeller CFR publication, Foreign Affairs, regarding Moscow’s support for “the national bourgeoisie of the third world,” unlike China under Mao. During the Vietnam War era, FEDZOGUSA & EASTZOG (the USSR) were planning World War III against China. U.S. forces were in Vietnam to open a second front against China in such a war, but, as usual, the USA flip-flopped & became allies with Red China under Rockefeller employees Nixon & Kissinger. If you have the USA as a friend, you never need an enemy. The USA is a rogue state which regularly disregards so-called international law & also switches allies & enemies in Orwellian fashion.
The context of guerrilla warfare is all-important. Dr. Goebbels was so impressed by the effectiveness of “partisan warfare” against the Germans that he thought Germans could do the same, should Germany be invaded & occupied by aliens. In his film, “Kolberg,” he touted the Volksarmee or People’s Army, which later branched into the Werewolves: Armed civilians. Anti-White Ike quickly put the Werewolves out of commission by publicly announcing the Allied occupiers’ intention of killing 200 Germans for each U.S. or Allied soldier killed.
The Germans would kill 10 hostages per German soldier killed by partisans, but the real reason for the collapse of German resistance was that Germany was mainly German, whereas the Soviet Empire & other countries were often not ethnically united, but ethnically divided. Jews bragged in their literature how they disguised themselves as Germans to commit atrocities on Poles, Russians, Ukrainians et al., & vice versa. Serbs would attack Germans in Croatia, so the Germans would make reprisals against the Croatians, whom the Serbs hated, & vice versa. Occupiers experience similar tribal tactics in Afghanistan & Iraq. But the real terrorist in the USA is our ZOG which uses 9-11s to herd Goyim as Israel desires. DOWZ! ORION!
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.
by E. Thomson
As a former conventional soldier, one could envy the guerrillero for many things. He was able to travel light, for his food & sometimes his weapons were supplied by local supporters among his people. He enjoyed superb intelligence, for his eyes were with his people, wherever they were. He could choose his terrain & his time to fight. If he were wounded, he could rely upon his people to care for him.
For the conventional soldier, it was pretty much the opposite. Whatever one needed was carried on one’s back, including food & weapons. He had to gather his own intelligence in usually neutral or hostile circumstances, & he had to maintain contact with H.Q. for their intelligence, & hope it was up to date. H.Q. sent orders for one to fight on THEIR time & terrain, & often the enemy would choose the time & terrain least favorable for you to fight. After all, that was the enemy’s job, but sometime it was difficult to distinguish H.Q. from the enemy. If wounded, the soldier hoped a medic were with his unit, & that he could be rapidly evacuated to a suitable dressing station or even a hospital.
Above all, the soldier maintains a certain distance between himself & the local population. The guerrilleros did the opposite, for they were OF the population. As a sentry I was ordered to let no one get close enough to seize my weapon or otherwise put me out of action. I notice how U.S. police have become militarized, & now behave like an alien occupation force: Present, but distant, with a tendency to treat the citizens as if they were enemies. Warfare is part of government, whether it be warfare against one’s own people or against ‘foreigners.’ The choice of strategy & tactics occur within an economic, demographic & political context, i.e. reality, rather than wishful-thinking.
In all forms of warfare we must ask “Cui bono?” Who benefits from a conflict? What are the objectives of war, with its destruction & terrorism? Who, in fact, is our enemy? In former Rhodesia, Ian Smith, our Prime Minister, had sold out to the Marxist enemy, long before his official handover to the Black Reds in 1980. In regions where I was stationed, local Whites informed me that an unofficial truce existed between government forces whom I represented & the “terrs” (terrorists). A local chief had made the deal, as I understood, & the Smith regime’s behavior strongly indicated its support for the enemy, in the peaceful areas I encountered. The “fix” was obviously in, while good Whites were sacrificed to lull the population into believing that the sellout had not occurred. Ian Smith so loved the Blacks that he handed them over to Robert Mugabe. How ironic. Too bad for the Blacks.
Ideology in warfare is usually adapted to circumstances. Marxism was designed for industrial workers, not for rural peasants. According to Marxists with whom I’ve spoken, the “workers’ paradise” was supposed to blossom in Germany, certainly not Russia or China! Since Marxism was jewish, the kosher Khazars used its universalist message to cloak their tribal conquest of the Russian Empire. The Chinese jew Soong banksters funded both Chiang & Mao, as an experiment to see who’d win. Like true jews, they cared not a whit for the millions of Chinese Goyim who’d bear the brunt of either regime. The Soongs would win, regardless, as they have been doing.
Chalmers Johnson wrote a good account of change in China, whose rulers wanted to enjoy White technology, so as to keep the White invaders out. Chiang adopted ideas from the West, including the USA, whereas Mao adopted Marxism via Moscow. Johnson describes Mao’s need to abandon the cities & their few ‘workers’ in favor of fleeing into the vast rural areas, where the majority of the Chinese were. Thus, Mao had to learn guerrilla warfare on the double, for his forces were beset by Chiang’s more numerous, better trained & better armed forces. Mao’s rescuers came in the unlikely form of Japanese invaders, who easily defeated Chiang’s forces in conventional battles, for the Japanese had adopted the latest White military technology & knew how to use it, very well. Chiang retreated to distant, defensible areas, & abandoned a large territory to Mao, the Japanese & their puppet warlords. The Japs were not running a popularity contest, for their idea of conquering territory was to terrorize the population by killing as many as they encountered. This tactic played into Mao’s hands, for he could finally talk to the arch-conservative peasants with words to the effect: The Japanese will come to kill you, regardless of anything you do or don’t do. Since you have nothing to lose, you might as well fight them. We’ll show you how. Hence, the Maoists became teachers, & thus leaders, who gained the respect of the peasants. Prior to the Jap-attack, Maoists had been deemed ‘foreigners’ with crazy ideas. With Chiang out of the picture, Mao was able to organize his movement & build its strength, so the Japs would have to come in large groups or not at all, as the Spaniards had done in Cuba & the U.S. forces did in Vietnam. Large troop movements give the enemy plenty of warning, & American motorized movements gave advance fanfare, so their opponents had lots of time for concealment & ambush arrangements.
The British in Malaya, & the Whites in Rhodesia found small units, moving quickly, to be most effective in defeating guerrilleros on the move. These 5-man ‘sticks’ would pursue the enemy constantly, & they would be replaced or reinforced by air, so the enemy had no chance to rest, & often little time in which to set up ambushes for rearguard purposes. The White man’s radio also came in handy, although drums are more romantic in jungle settings. Certainly, small unit actions are effective against similar enemy units, but such combat is not easy, & requires highly-skilled & motivated people who are also very fit. Thus, regimes which are ‘in’ can use similar tactics to regimes which are ‘out’.
Deception, the god of the Israeli Mossad, is one of the factors which makes war an art. Psychology plays an important role in the effectiveness of tactics, including deception, as with the placement of landmines & boobytraps. Another use of deception occurs in false flag operations such as the failed attack on the USS Liberty & the successful attack on 9-11. In Latin America, mainly Colombia, where I worked for 2 years, I experienced a few false flag ops in which my residence was bombed by the USA or its Colombian puppets. The bombs at U.S. premises were not particularly destructive, & they served as pretexts for the government to round up persons whom they did not like. Colombia’s 300 year old civil war was sporadic, bloody, & popularly known as “la violencia,” “the violence,” which was omnipresent. I joked that silence just meant a pause to reload. When I saw dead bodies here & there, or someone killed with the slice of a machete, I didn’t know if these victims were outcomes of personal animosities or political differences. The second week after my arrival in Cali, newspapers reported the beheading of 52 civilians on the highway to Bogotá. Allegedly, bandits disguised as soldiers had set up a roadblock & herded passengers & drivers from trucks, buses & cars behind a hut, where they were beheaded by the usual machetes. Later, as I became more familiar with Colombian conditions, I wondered if the bandits were not really Colombian troops using deception to cast blame on their opponents. This tactic is also called a black op. Generally, the ‘bandits’ carried more modern weapons than did the Colombian Army, but I was not on the scene, & my head remains intact & in place as a result. Guerrilleros were also accused of killing hospital patients & staff in rural areas, for reasons inscrutable, if not suspicious.
Just as Mao had to revise Marxist tactics to fit his circumstances, Che Guevara was defeated by using Maoist tactics in Bolivia, by going to the countryside, where the people were NOT. He seems to have been betrayed by his Moscow contacts who tipped off Moscow which tipped off the USA, which tipped off the Bolivian Army to chase Guevara’s group until they were killed or captured. Apparently, Moscow wanted no more Cubas, & I read official statements to that effect in bankster publications like the Rockefeller CFR publication, Foreign Affairs, regarding Moscow’s support for “the national bourgeoisie of the third world,” unlike China under Mao. During the Vietnam War era, FEDZOGUSA & EASTZOG (the USSR) were planning World War III against China. U.S. forces were in Vietnam to open a second front against China in such a war, but, as usual, the USA flip-flopped & became allies with Red China under Rockefeller employees Nixon & Kissinger. If you have the USA as a friend, you never need an enemy. The USA is a rogue state which regularly disregards so-called international law & also switches allies & enemies in Orwellian fashion.
The context of guerrilla warfare is all-important. Dr. Goebbels was so impressed by the effectiveness of “partisan warfare” against the Germans that he thought Germans could do the same, should Germany be invaded & occupied by aliens. In his film, “Kolberg,” he touted the Volksarmee or People’s Army, which later branched into the Werewolves: Armed civilians. Anti-White Ike quickly put the Werewolves out of commission by publicly announcing the Allied occupiers’ intention of killing 200 Germans for each U.S. or Allied soldier killed.
The Germans would kill 10 hostages per German soldier killed by partisans, but the real reason for the collapse of German resistance was that Germany was mainly German, whereas the Soviet Empire & other countries were often not ethnically united, but ethnically divided. Jews bragged in their literature how they disguised themselves as Germans to commit atrocities on Poles, Russians, Ukrainians et al., & vice versa. Serbs would attack Germans in Croatia, so the Germans would make reprisals against the Croatians, whom the Serbs hated, & vice versa. Occupiers experience similar tribal tactics in Afghanistan & Iraq. But the real terrorist in the USA is our ZOG which uses 9-11s to herd Goyim as Israel desires. DOWZ! ORION!
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.