View Full Version : Bigfoot: The Thread
AntonF
August 15th, 2008, 02:35 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/index.html
CNN) -- A policeman and a former corrections officer say that on Friday they will unveil evidence of what they claim is their biggest find ever: the body of Bigfoot.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/art.thawedcreature.cnn.jpg
Is this for real?
fdtwainth
August 15th, 2008, 02:41 PM
No it is not. And the thread itself belongs to Nutzpah, imho
AntonF
August 15th, 2008, 02:44 PM
CNN is covering it. Not that they lie all the time about everything but about this?
fdtwainth
August 15th, 2008, 02:51 PM
CNN is covering it. Not that they lie all the time about everything but about this?
The lying democratic tv station cnn allows itself to lie from time to time to support some useful myths in the consciousness of the illiterate lemmings, like "bigfoot" or "aliens", because its audience consists largely of (half)illiterate lemmings.
White Nationalist news media, in contrast, cannot allow to circulate such lies, since their target audience is independently minded and intelligent White men. Every presentation of such myths entails loss of credibility among out target audience.
The so called "bigfoot" cannot exist biologically, no one has ever seen it. Ergo, it does not exists, and the thread itself belongs to Nutzpah.
Alex Linder
August 15th, 2008, 03:41 PM
The lying democratic tv station cnn allows itself to lie from time to time to support some useful myths in the consciousness of the illiterate lemmings, like "bigfoot" or "aliens", because its audience consists largely of (half)illiterate lemmings.
White Nationalist news media, in contrast, cannot allow to circulate such lies, since their target audience is independently minded and intelligent White men. Every presentation of such myths entails loss of credibility among out target audience.
The so called "bigfoot" cannot exist biologically, no one has ever seen it. Ergo, it does not exists, and the thread itself belongs to Nutzpah.
Relax, fdtwainth. It helps to have in VNNF what the controlled media have - the names help pull in outsiders using search engines. Some things are interesting on their own, and bigfoot is one of them. Of course, I don't believe in it, but it's always neat to see people try to pull off hoaxes. I remember saying, "That's bullshit" re that film of bigfoot somewhere in the northwest, maybe California. Where bf is walking away and then looks back at the camera. And sure enough, the guys who did it eventually admitted it. Same as with WTC demolitions. After I realized it was not a Hollywood movie, I knew it was a Mossad production.
Jett Rink
August 15th, 2008, 03:46 PM
And then they reveal at a junkyard the rusting body of the oringinal 1974 Bigfoot monster truck.
Donnie in Ohio
August 15th, 2008, 03:50 PM
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/art.thawedcreature.cnn.jpg
Is this for real?
Looks like Patrick Ewing in a fur coat. /shrug
John in Woodbridge
August 15th, 2008, 03:59 PM
Bigfoot is a hoax.
http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/patterson_bigfoot.jpg
That's Melcur disguised in a monkey outfit trying to keep one step ahead of the mossad. lol
Signal
August 15th, 2008, 04:00 PM
I've been watching this story for awhile. These guys are close to where I live. This is more than it appears. Not just a crazy "bigfoot" story. It's a Clayton County Georgia Sheriff's Deputy engaging in fraud and as far as I know he has not been fired as of yet. He is on leave because he recently shot himself in the hand while on duty.
These guys started out offering bigfoot hunting expeditions in the north Georgia mountains for $500. They later began to claim that they had the corpse. They released a video on Youtube in which they are at the Atlanta airport picking up a scientist from Texas to take samples from the corpse for research.
YouTube - Bigfoot Tracker - Video 8
Soon after the release of that video the "scientist" was exposed as being the deputy's brother and not a scientist at all. Then they released this video lashing out at the people who exposed their lie.
YouTube - Bigfoot Tracker - Admission of Hoax
They've since became involved with a notorious hoaxer named Tom Biscardi who has a history of telling lies about "bigfoot".
They said during the press conference today that they were offering spots on their next "expedition" for $1000.
A cop running a scam. Who would've guessed it?
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 05:12 PM
CNN is covering it. Not that they lie all the time about everything but about this?
Actually they blunder often, just a few weeks ago they showed pics of a Hungarian protest and labeled it as Serbian violence when the real Serbian protest was peaceful. The picture contained fire and such, it surely impressed upon a Lemming that Serbians are violent assholes. Typical.
Leshrac
August 15th, 2008, 05:33 PM
No it is not. And the thread itself belongs to Nutzpah, imho
And why is it not ?
For all we know things such as dragons might actually have existed. They're just gone now, much like dinos.
The first stories about the Sasquatch date from the 1800's. Maybe there actually was some sort of giant monkey living in the woods back then.
Alex Linder
August 15th, 2008, 05:35 PM
Bigfoot is a hoax.
http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/patterson_bigfoot.jpg
That's Melcur disguised in a monkey outfit trying to keep one step ahead of the mossad. lol
Yeah, that's precisely the frame I was referring to. The minute that thing pulled a Heisman pose I burst out laughing. You could feel the fucksticks planning it out beforehand.
Leshrac
August 15th, 2008, 05:42 PM
The so called "bigfoot" cannot exist biologically, no one has ever seen it. Ergo, it does not exists, and the thread itself belongs to Nutzpah.
No one saw the dinosaurs either. Does this mean all the bones and fossils are fake ? ;)
cannot exist biologically
Say what ? There are even bioluminescent fishes and you're telling me an over-sized monkey can't exist ? What are you smoking ?
Nature doesn't seem to care about the human definition of what is "biologically possible" :D
Axel Faaborg
August 15th, 2008, 05:49 PM
No one saw the dinosaurs either. Does this mean all the bones and fossils are fake ? ;)
No, but wouldn't you think we'd have found at least some Bigfoot bones by now?
I wouldn't say Bigfoot existing is outside the realm of possibility, but it is not very probable.
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 05:49 PM
No one saw the dinosaurs either. Does this mean all the bones and fossils are fake ? ;)
Say what ? There are even bioluminescent fishes and you're telling me an over-sized monkey can't exist ? What are you smoking ?
Nature doesn't seem to care about the human definition of what is "biologically possible" :D
Leshrac is defensive because the body of this creature is actually his father, he is going through a very stressful period in his life having lost his mentor. It will be hard for Leshrac to go on with life like this.
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 05:53 PM
But in all seriousness I side with Leshrac, nature has created some insane structures with a lot of novelty towards fitness. Whales who walked on land, glow in the dark plants, even a giraffe's neck is an incredible adapatation or even the eyes that started merely as light receptors.
cillian
August 15th, 2008, 05:53 PM
And why is it not ?
For all we know things such as dragons might actually have existed. They're just gone now, much like dinos.
The first stories about the Sasquatch date from the 1800's. Maybe there actually was some sort of giant monkey living in the woods back then.
I bet the idea of dragons came from someone digging up a dinosaur skull from a rock quarry, same with giants. I can guarantee they couldn't breath fire.
April
August 15th, 2008, 05:55 PM
Relax, fdtwainth. It helps to have in VNNF what the controlled media have - the names help pull in outsiders using search engines. Some things are interesting on their own, and bigfoot is one of them. Of course, I don't believe in it, but it's always neat to see people try to pull off hoaxes. I remember saying, "That's bullshit" re that film of bigfoot somewhere in the northwest, maybe California. Where bf is walking away and then looks back at the camera. And sure enough, the guys who did it eventually admitted it. Same as with WTC demolitions. After I realized it was not a Hollywood movie, I knew it was a Mossad production.
Actually the people who claimed they were the ones who were in the suit were in fact the hoaxers. They asked them repeatedly to produce feet or the costume and they never could. There have been about 10 people who have made that claim. The guy who filmed it died not too long ago and the other guy who was there with him who was a teenager at the time has never said it was a hoax, and the photographer never admitted it was a hoax.
Recently scientists from a university took the footage and a large athlete and tried to get him to reproduce, step by step that kind of walk. They concluded that the human body cannot move in that way so it could not have been a guy in a monkey suit.
Meanwhile up in the high country where my parents live they say that they actually have a family of them living that the government has been protecting for years. One of our family friends has seen the pictures of them and he was planning on going up there to try to shoot it with a tranquilizer gun. A few years ago a group of backpackers got attacked by the group and they ran out of there in the middle of the night leaving all their equipment.
Now you can say that is no proof, and I would agree, I am skeptical too but I know this, if you have ever spent much time in the wilderness or flown over our country you know there are so many vast acres of land where no man has ever stepped that it would be easy to evade capture for so many years.
Remember Steve Fossi ( sp) the aviator who got lost last year in his plane over the nevada desert. They still have not found him or his plane and they know he could only be in a 200 mile radius and there are no trees there to hide the wreckage.
I hope that it is true. Mostly because all the media assholes keep saying it is a hoax and acting really crappy to those old rednecks who found it. I would like to see Shepard Smith eat his words...I hate that guy.
April
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 05:55 PM
No, but wouldn't you think we'd have found at least some Bigfoot bones by now?
I wouldn't say Bigfoot existing is outside the realm of possibility, but it is not very probable.
What if Bigfoot is merely an offshoot of another hominid that hasn't evolved much? Chimps haven't changed all that much either.
Leshrac
August 15th, 2008, 05:58 PM
I bet the idea of dragons came from someone digging up a dinosaur skull from a rock quarry, same with giants. I can guarantee they couldn't breath fire.
Do me a favor and watch this. How about these fishes who spit sodium-generating bacterias to make light in the dark zone ?
YouTube - The Blue Planet - Deep Sea Pt.2
Edit: Or the ones projecting infrared light from their eyes ? Impossible ? Think again :D
Christopher Drake
August 15th, 2008, 05:59 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/index.html
CNN) -- A policeman and a former corrections officer say that on Friday they will unveil evidence of what they claim is their biggest find ever: the body of Bigfoot.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/art.thawedcreature.cnn.jpg
Is this for real?
I'm pretty sure those are just photos taken from Bernie Mac's wake.
April
August 15th, 2008, 06:03 PM
I wonder how many of you have spent a good deal of time in the wilderness and realize how vast our country and the world is. There are still many untouched places on the planet, despite what Al Gore would have you think.
For instance, I could walk an hour from my home and probably get into country were no people have been for years.
Here is a perfect example. Recently in Africa they discovered that the " endangered " lowland gorilla existed in very large numbers in a part of the Congo. They estimate that 125.000 of these large silverbacks are in that area, doubling the number they previously thought to exist in the world.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/08/05/congo.gorillas/
Now if will all the science we have this is a recent find, what makes you think that a semi intelligent humanoid couldnt exist without detection.
April
April
August 15th, 2008, 06:05 PM
No, but wouldn't you think we'd have found at least some Bigfoot bones by now?
I wouldn't say Bigfoot existing is outside the realm of possibility, but it is not very probable.
How many bear skeletons have you found in the woods? I hike all the time and have never found a deer skeleton or a bear skeleton or even a wild boar skeleton.....
If they are semi intelligent they probably bury their dead.
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 06:08 PM
Do me a favor and watch this. How about these fishes who spit sodium-generating bacterias to make light in the dark zone ?
YouTube - The Blue Planet - Deep Sea Pt.2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00YJIyoZ56U)
Edit: Or the ones projecting infrared light from their eyes ? Impossible ? Think again :D
Pretty interesting stuff. :D
Donnie in Ohio
August 15th, 2008, 06:09 PM
Now if with all the science we have this is a recent find, what makes you think that a semi intelligent humanoid couldn't exist without detection.
The Obama camp would have them registered to vote by now.
Leshrac
August 15th, 2008, 06:11 PM
If they are semi intelligent they probably bury their dead.
The most coherent insect on earth, they think like commies tho :D :
YouTube - Ants!
T. Kadijevic
August 15th, 2008, 06:11 PM
So, I'm sure in their little disclaimer that money will not be returned to the gullible adventure seekers? :mad: Oh, wait, for believing that shit they deserve to lose it. :D
Oh, yeah. The part I like on one of their other videos is that they were holding off on showing the video/pics of their proof on advice from their lawyer. :troll
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 06:19 PM
Edit: Or the ones projecting infrared light from their eyes ? Impossible ? Think again :D
I think that's visible red light not infrared. It's just that most other critters can't see it.
Leshrac
August 15th, 2008, 06:25 PM
I think that's visible red light not infrared. It's just that most other critters can't see it.
Still, when was the last time you saw a creature able to use its eyes like a flashlight ? :D
Peer Fischer
August 15th, 2008, 07:48 PM
PALO ALTO, California (Reuters) - Bigfoot remains as elusive as ever.
Results from tests on genetic material from alleged remains of one of the mythical half-ape and half-human creatures, made public at a news conference on Friday held after the claimed discovery swept the Internet, failed to prove its existence.
Its spread was fueled by a photograph of a hairy heap, bearing a close resemblance to a shaggy full-body gorilla costume, stuffed into a container resembling a refrigerator.
One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1544880720080815
Bill
August 15th, 2008, 07:59 PM
How many bear skeletons have you found in the woods? I hike all the time and have never found a deer skeleton or a bear skeleton or even a wild boar skeleton.....
Seriously, you have never seen deer bones ? Within a 10 minute walk of where I am now, I know 3 spots with deer remains, one spot with a juvenile skull ( I saw it before it fully decomposed) intact.
Steve B
August 15th, 2008, 08:05 PM
Here is a perfect example. Recently in Africa they discovered that the " endangered " lowland gorilla existed in very large numbers in a part of the Congo. They estimate that 125.000 of these large silverbacks are in that area, doubling the number they previously thought to exist in the world.
Now if will all the science we have this is a recent find, what makes you think that a semi intelligent humanoid couldnt exist without detection.
April
Well thats the problem right there. They're looking in the wrong place for these apes. Detroit is crawling with them.
Jett Rink
August 15th, 2008, 08:07 PM
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/art.thawedcreature.cnn.jpg
Oh my god!!!!
That looks like Ted!
I told him!!!!!!!!!!!
I told him he would get himself shot one day if he tried to play a prank on those hunters with that damn Bigfoot costume he had left over from Halloween.
Dave from New York
August 15th, 2008, 08:07 PM
PALO ALTO, California (Reuters) - Bigfoot remains as elusive as ever.
Results from tests on genetic material from alleged remains of one of the mythical half-ape and half-human creatures, made public at a news conference on Friday held after the claimed discovery swept the Internet, failed to prove its existence.
Its spread was fueled by a photograph of a hairy heap, bearing a close resemblance to a shaggy full-body gorilla costume, stuffed into a container resembling a refrigerator.
One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1544880720080815
Well, we can finally put to rest all those 'Is Bigfoot White?' threads I've seen popping up.
psychologicalshock
August 15th, 2008, 08:20 PM
Seriously, you have never seen deer bones ? Within a 10 minute walk of where I am now, I know 3 spots with deer remains, one spot with a juvenile skull ( I saw it before it fully decomposed) intact.
I've seen quite a few remains in the woods myself.
April
August 15th, 2008, 08:32 PM
Seriously, you have never seen deer bones ? Within a 10 minute walk of where I am now, I know 3 spots with deer remains, one spot with a juvenile skull ( I saw it before it fully decomposed) intact.
No I havent and we have a ton of deer in the area. The only dead deer I see are the ones hit by cars alongside the road.
I used to spend a huge amount of time hiking around when I was a kid and never saw a coyote or fox carcass either.
April
April
August 15th, 2008, 08:35 PM
Well they explained that they took the sample from the intestine and if that is what he had been eating, that is what would show up on the test.
Here are some samples of humans with human DNA who look like animals. It would make sense that a humanoid creature would have similar DNA.
http://www.strangepersons.com/content/item/105412.html
http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/134600.html
Axel Faaborg
August 15th, 2008, 09:01 PM
Oh my god!!!!
That looks like Ted!
I told him!!!!!!!!!!!
I told him he would get himself shot one day if he tried to play a prank on those hunters with that damn Bigfoot costume he had left over from Halloween.
Bwahahaha, that was actually something me and my ex were going to do. We were an odd couple.
matthew
August 15th, 2008, 09:15 PM
well they did shoot it in georgia.... maybe they just shot a really hairy nigger who was high on jenkem and stumbling through the woods
H.B.
August 15th, 2008, 09:30 PM
One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1544880720080815
It's pathetic that Kwans feel a need to fabricate myths about seven-foot tall non-humans that walk upright and have ape-like features when all they need to do is turn on the TV and watch a basketball game ... ;)
Christopher Drake
August 15th, 2008, 09:40 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/index.html
CNN) -- A policeman and a former corrections officer say that on Friday they will unveil evidence of what they claim is their biggest find ever: the body of Bigfoot.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/US/08/14/bigfoot.body/art.thawedcreature.cnn.jpg
Is this for real?
Wait a minute...They said "Georgia"?? Thats why he never came home! Papa, Noooo!
Fred Streed
August 15th, 2008, 09:52 PM
Actually the people who claimed they were the ones who were in the suit were in fact the hoaxers.
April
That is correct. The two guys who actually filmed the footage were Roger Patterson and a guy named Gimlin. Patterson is dead, maybe Gimlin is also by now. Neither of them ever said it was a hoax, in fact no one could ever get them to deviate from the original story. The guy who claimed to be in on the hoax and said he was the dude in the monkey suit was proven to be a liar.
I spent several years not too far from Bluff Creek in Northern California where the film was shot. It is some of the most remote and rugged terrain in North America, and was even more so in the 1960s when Patterson shot the film. I still love that area, the lower Klamath River/Trinity River/Salmon River watershed.
Do I believe in Bigfoot? Well, I will just say that I have spent a hell of a lot of time in some really remote areas in that part of the country, a lot of it alone, hiking and camping, climbing a mountain now and then, and I have never ran across any Sasquatches. I fought a lot of fires there also, when I worked for the U.S.Forest Circus. I used to hike into the Trinity Alps in the middle of the Winter, alone, and spend several days at a time there. I would be the only human in that entire wilderness. Now that I think about it I was kind of a strange guy when I was younger. But I never met with Bigfoot. That doesn't mean he is not there, just that I never encountered him.
Christopher Drake
August 15th, 2008, 10:04 PM
I really don't think thats my daddy. However, I'm pretty sure I met the dead guy at motorcycle rally.
Franco
August 15th, 2008, 10:23 PM
That is correct. The two guys who actually filmed the footage were Roger Patterson and a guy named Gimlin. Patterson is dead, maybe Gimlin is also by now. Neither of them ever said it was a hoax, in fact no one could ever get them to deviate from the original story. The guy who claimed to be in on the hoax and said he was the dude in the monkey suit was proven to be a liar.
I spent several years not too far from Bluff Creek in Northern California where the film was shot. It is some of the most remote and rugged terrain in North America, and was even more so in the 1960s when Patterson shot the film. I still love that area, the lower Klamath River/Trinity River/Salmon River watershed.
Do I believe in Bigfoot? Well, I will just say that I have spent a hell of a lot of time in some really remote areas in that part of the country, a lot of it alone, hiking and camping, climbing a mountain now and then, and I have never ran across any Sasquatches. I fought a lot of fires there also, when I worked for the U.S.Forest Circus. I used to hike into the Trinity Alps in the middle of the Winter, alone, and spend several days at a time there. I would be the only human in that entire wilderness. Now that I think about it I was kind of a strange guy when I was younger. But I never met with Bigfoot. That doesn't mean he is not there, just that I never encountered him.
The fact that no Bigfoot bones have been found in any forest in the past 100 years suggests that Bigfoot exists only in the mind.
----------------------
Frank Toliver
August 15th, 2008, 10:33 PM
I just want to know how to marinade and grill it best to bring out that BIG bigfoot taste.
April
August 15th, 2008, 10:35 PM
That is correct. The two guys who actually filmed the footage were Roger Patterson and a guy named Gimlin. Patterson is dead, maybe Gimlin is also by now. Neither of them ever said it was a hoax, in fact no one could ever get them to deviate from the original story. The guy who claimed to be in on the hoax and said he was the dude in the monkey suit was proven to be a liar.
The second guy is still alive, he was young with the video was made. He recently spoke about it on Monsterquest.
Jett Rink
August 15th, 2008, 10:40 PM
Bigfoot is big business to some.
Alex Linder
August 16th, 2008, 12:14 AM
That is correct. The two guys who actually filmed the footage were Roger Patterson and a guy named Gimlin. Patterson is dead, maybe Gimlin is also by now. Neither of them ever said it was a hoax, in fact no one could ever get them to deviate from the original story. The guy who claimed to be in on the hoax and said he was the dude in the monkey suit was proven to be a liar.
I didn't know about this, so thanks for the information. I have no academic credentials, but I would bet my life that film is a hoax. No animal moves like that, and all kinds of humans record video like that, with the creature helpfully turning toward the camera, per the director.
Fred Streed
August 16th, 2008, 01:29 AM
I didn't know about this, so thanks for the information. I have no academic credentials, but I would bet my life that film is a hoax. No animal moves like that, and all kinds of humans record video like that, with the creature helpfully turning toward the camera, per the director.
I always kind of assumed it was a hoax, but I really didn't know much about it. A few years ago I got curious about the "bigfoot phenomena" and hit a few of the bigfoot sites on the internet. Turns out the bigfoot believers hold the Patterson/Gimlin film out as one of their strongest pieces of evidence. According to them it has never been successfully debunked. What would be relatively easy to fake now was not so easy back in the mid sixties.
There doesn't seem to really be much solid evidence for the existence of sasquatch. The Patterson film, a few footprint castings which would seem to be easy to fake, and eyewitness stories are about it. However a lot of the locals around Weitchpec, Sommes Bar, Orleans, Willow Creek, or Happy Camp believe it. They won't talk about it to strangers but if you get to know them, especially after a few beers, they will tell you that they believe there is something out there. Perhaps they are just trying to discourage people from snooping around and interfering with them making an "honest" living growing Amerikwa's number one cash crop.
I am a skeptic myself, with the proviso that there is a lot of damned empty country in the western part of North America and that if old Biggy could hide anywhere it would be that Northern California mountain area. I have probably been deeper into some of those areas than most of the locals and at the time I never really seriously considered the possibility that there could be some big ape-men living there. It was years later that I finally got kind of interested in Bigfoot. That is "interested", not believer, just as I am interested in flying saucer sightings and holohoax stories and idiots who believe humans and niggers are no different.
BTW, do you know the difference between Bigfoot and a smart, hardworking, honest nigro? There are people who claim to have actually seen Bigfoot.
matthew
August 16th, 2008, 02:13 AM
I just want to know how to marinade and grill it best to bring out that BIG bigfoot taste.
a question that comes to mind is, who's going to do the jacklinks beef jerky commercials now?
http://www.geocities.com/longhaul_trucker26101/bigfoot.JPG
IceQueen
August 16th, 2008, 07:12 AM
This has been an interesting thread. I did not know that video of "Bigfoot" has never been debunked. I hope there really is a bigfoot species out there... <cue X-Files music> I want to believe. :D
There are new creatures discovered everyday. I just saw a little primate the size of a man's hand the other day that was recently found. It looked like a fury version of Gollum from Lord of the Rings. The thing was so ugly it was almost cute. Point is, there's all kinds of stuff out there no one has seen.
T. Kadijevic
August 16th, 2008, 07:41 AM
I'm more interested in seeing outer space aliens being revealed. It may help explain why the world is so messed up.
KMRATHELL
August 16th, 2008, 08:52 AM
"One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis."
The other 4 percent of bigfoot is human.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080815/us_nm/bigfoot_dc
cillian
August 16th, 2008, 08:55 AM
"One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis."
The other 4 percent of bigfoot is human.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080815/us_nm/bigfoot_dc
...so this is some sort of werepossum
KMRATHELL
August 16th, 2008, 09:08 AM
http://www.mcavenedesigns.com/Bigfoot/bigfoot_photo1.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2160/1594069170_733fe4d5e2.jpg?v=0
Alex Linder
August 16th, 2008, 04:36 PM
http://seemikedraw.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/bigfoot.gif
psychologicalshock
August 16th, 2008, 04:47 PM
"One of the two samples of DNA said to prove the existence of the Bigfoot came from a human and the other was 96 percent from an opossum, according to Curt Nelson, a scientist at the University of Minnesota who performed the DNA analysis."
The other 4 percent of bigfoot is human.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080815/us_nm/bigfoot_dc
...... This must be a joke.
odin
August 16th, 2008, 04:52 PM
The two guys who actually filmed the footage were Roger Patterson and a guy named Gimlin. Patterson is dead, maybe Gimlin is also by now. Neither of them ever said it was a hoax, in fact no one could ever get them to deviate from the original story.Robert Gimlin in a 1999 interview: "I was totally convinced no one could fool me. And of course I'm an older man now...and I think there could have been the possibility of a hoax. But it would have to be really well planned by Roger [Patterson]."
Robert Bandanza
August 19th, 2008, 05:55 AM
Alas, the search for Bigfoot continues.
No evidence has emerged to support claims made last week by two men who said they found the corpse of a seven-foot-tall (two-meter-tall) Bigfoot—an apelike creature of North American legend—in the woods of northern Georgia.
Critics declared the men's story a bold hoax after the pair refused to show the body and following the disclosure that genetic tests from the alleged remains revealed only human and opossum DNA.
Discovery of a Lifetime
Matt Whitton and Rick Dyer spoke to a packed room of reporters last Friday in Palo Alto, California, about their discovery. Joining them on stage was controversial Bigfoot hunter Tom Biscardi.
Whitton told a compelling story of how he and Dyer found the body of the dead Sasquatch—as the creature is also called—next to a stream while hiking in the Georgian woods in early June.
Whitton said he stood guard by the body for nine hours while Dyer went back to get a truck.
When Dyer returned, the pair dragged the hairy 500-pound (230-kilogram) corpse through the woods to the truck—all while being shadowed by three live Sasquatch.
"As we were bringing it out, they were paralleling us," said Whitton, a Georgia police officer on administrative leave.
Whitton said that after reaching their truck, they refrigerated the Bigfoot body and soon after contacted Biscardi.
Weak Evidence
At the press conference, the self-proclaimed "best Bigfoot hunters in the world" declined repeated requests to display the Sasquatch remains.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-bigfoot-dna.html
Instead, they handed out photographs purportedly showing the creature's mouth and tongue, and a blurry image of a hairy figure strolling through the woods.
Reporters and other Bigfoot investigators were underwhelmed by the group's evidence.
"When I first heard about this, I was optimistic and hopeful," said Jeff Meldrum, an anthropologist and Bigfoot investigator at Idaho State University. "But when I heard [Tom Biscardi] was involved, that optimism quickly evaporated."
Within the community of amateur and professional Bigfoot hunters, Biscardi has a "reputation of ill repute," Meldrum said.
Meldrum is also extremely skeptical about the authenticity of a photograph released in the days leading up to the press conference showing what appears to be a hairy corpse in a refrigerator.
"It looks like a heap of costume fur. It doesn't look like natural hair," Meldrum said. "The gut pile looks like it was dumped on there just for effect."
Mixed DNA Results
Casting further doubt on the group's claim are mixed DNA results from the purported body.
The DNA sample was analyzed by Curt Nelson, a molecular biologist at the University of Minnesota, who described it as a mixture of human and opossum.
Biscardi's "suggestion was that the tissue sample was from the intestine of the animal, and that the animal had eaten an opossum," Nelson told National Geographic News. "That seems improbable to me."
Jason Linville is a forensics expert at the University of Alabama at Birmingham who was not involved in the DNA analysis.
If the group had instead sent in hair samples from the body, it would have been relatively simple to confirm that it belonged to an unidentified primate species, Linville said.
"In theory, you could analyze that DNA and it would come up as something that didn't quite mach human and didn't quite match primate, but was something pretty close to it," Linville said.
Media Storm
Matthew Moneymaker is the president of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, an international network of Bigfoot investigators.
Moneymaker called the press conference an elaborate "profiteering scam" engineered by Biscardi.
"They know there's tremendous interest in seeing photographs of [Bigfoot], and they're trying to get people to pay to see hoaxed photos," he said.
Moneymaker's organization tracks Bigfoot news in the media, and he says Biscardi really scored with his latest exploit.
"There's been at least a thousand stories in newspapers across the world," Moneymaker said. "Before this, the highest record was about 200 articles in newspapers."
Moneymaker predicts that the mass exposure could actually hurt Biscardi in the long run.
"Now he's really a famous con man," Moneymaker said. "He was a con man known in Bigfoot circles for years, and now it won't be long before everybody knows it."
Biscardi, Whitton, and Dyer remain undeterred, however. The trio said they plan to conduct an autopsy of their Bigfoot corpse in the near future.
"I want to get to the bottom of it," Biscardi said. "What I seen, what I touched, what I felt, and what I prodded was not a mask that was sewn on a bear hide, OK?"
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080818-bigfoot-dna_2.html
Metal Warrior
August 19th, 2008, 07:49 AM
Still, when was the last time you saw a creature able to use its eyes like a flashlight ? :D
Last time I saw X-Men, who are apparently more real than the Georgia Bigfoot.
http://www.x-men-legends.com/archives/image/cyclops_1280-thumb.jpg
AntonF
August 19th, 2008, 07:55 AM
They fooled the JEWS at CNN who stuck the story up on theie site?
fdtwainth
August 19th, 2008, 08:13 AM
They fooled the JEWS at CNN who stuck the story up on theie site?
Yes, the lying democratic tv station cnn lied again, as it always does. And the jews at cnn were all too happy to fool the goyim one more time.
Signal
August 19th, 2008, 05:52 PM
Clayton County Officer Loses Job Over Biogfoot Hoax
Last Edited: Tuesday, 19 Aug 2008, 6:44 PM EDT
Created: Tuesday, 19 Aug 2008, 6:44 PM EDT
Edited by Steve Dixon
ATLANTA (MyFOX Atlanta) -- A Clayton County police officer has lost his job over the "Bigfoot" hoax.
Police chief Jeff Turner said he took action against Matt Whitton after he learned the story was made-up.
Whitton was one of two men to claim they had dragged Bigfoot's body out of the north Georgia mountains and had it in a freezer.
The men presented pictures they said proved they had Bigfoot.
But it turns out that "creature" was actually a rubber suit.
The "body" was taken in for an autopsy and that's when experts say they learned it was a fake.
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=7242528&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
:hflol:hflol:hflol
EDIT: Strich, that's a Foxjews spelling error in the article title, not mine.
Alex Linder
December 12th, 2009, 02:01 PM
Bigfoot in the northwoods? Automatic camera picks up strange image near Remer
Tim Kedrowski and his sons, Peter and Casey, are not pushovers for Bigfoot stories, but a frame on a game trail camera set up on their hunting land north of Remer has left them in a quandary.
By: Molly Miron, Bemidji Pioneer
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/media/story/jpg/2009/12/10/200912101210-Bigfoot-Picture-copy.jpg
This image, taken in October by a game trail camera on hunting land north of Remer, captured a mysterious creature. Submitted Photo
Tim Kedrowski and his sons, Peter and Casey, are not pushovers for Bigfoot stories, but a frame on a game trail camera set up on their hunting land north of Remer has left them in a quandary.
“To us, it’s very hard because we lean toward the skeptical type,” Kedrowski said in a telephone interview from his Rice, Minn., home.
But after checking with neighbors and any other hunters who might have been walking through the dense woods at 7:20 p.m. on the rainy night of Oct. 24, he said they couldn’t imagine what else the image could be. Tim said he considered ideas from a bear to a bow hunter in a fuzzy suit. But the arm and hand couldn’t be a bear’s, or its upright gait. And there is no evidence in the photo of a bow or flashlight a hunter might be using to track a wounded deer.
The Kedrowskis checked the Minnesota Bigfoot Web site and came up with the names of Don Sherman and Bob Olson, the Northern Minnesota Bigfoot Research Team.
Sherman is the facilities manager for the Cass Lake Indian Health Service Hospital, and Olson is an auto body repairman in Deer River.
Sherman has responded to numerous area Bigfoot sighting reports and has made casts of footprints. He said he once caught footage of a Bigfoot on a thermal imaging camera and heard its warbling call.
When Sherman saw the image the Kedrowskis sent him, Tim said the researcher responded that he believes it is a picture of a Bigfoot. Sherman went with the Kedrowskis to the photo site and measured the height of the creature in comparison the sapling next to it. He determined the animal is about 7 feet tall.
“I’ve hunted there for 43 years,” Tim said of their property near Shingle Mill Lake. “I’ve seen one bear off my deer stand. I’ve seen three timber wolves.”
Casey Kedrowski said he and his brother had gone out to the family’s hunting shack prior to deer season to bring in firewood and make other preparations. They set up a game trail camera to see what might be wandering around their property.
Casey said he and his brother were the only people who knew where the camera was located. They took the camera down when deer season started, and a couple of weeks later checked on what they had caught.
When they came to the picture of the long-armed creature walking upright, Casey said, “We just looked at each other. Each of us thought we were playing a trick on each other.”
When they determined that neither of them had pulled a prank on the other, they checked to see if anyone had been in the area that night. Tim said the only neighbors were two elderly hunters in their own shack, neither of whom matched the size and appearance of the creature caught on camera.
However, he said, when he asked the men about the night the camera clicked on the mystery, they said they had gone out about 2 a.m. to use the outhouse and had heard strange squealing noises. Tim said he asked them to show him the direction of the sounds. They pointed to the area where the camera had been, although they had no idea of its location.
Sharing photo
Tim said he just released the photo and permission for its publication last weekend.
“It was deer season and we wanted to concentrate on deer hunting, and (we) really wanted to talk to people in the area and … make sure they weren’t scamming us,” he said. “We’re not 100 percent sure, obviously. After visiting with (Sherman and Olson) we feel they’ve done a lot more investigation. That’s why we put it in their hands.”
Sherman said the Northern Minnesota Bigfoot Research Team started receiving reports of Bigfoot sightings in 2006 and has had reports every year since, including four reports this year. He said the first reported sighting he investigated was from a man running a road grader near Six Mile Lake south of Lake Winnibigoshish. Sherman said he was able to make casts of the footprints. A more recent sighting report was by a truck driver.
“I’ve talked to this guy – this was last year – he was coming from Crosby (Minn.) with a load of lumber by Washburn Lake,” Sherman said. “It had hands, he said, like baseball mitts. It took three steps to cross the road. He was pretty shook up.”
Doubt expressed
In spite of such seemingly credible reports, biologists remain unconvinced.
“Personally, I don’t buy the fact this thing exists,” said Blane Klemek, assistant wildlife manager with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in Bemidji.
“There are certainly species that are discovered each year –but megafauna – rare is it a big mammal is discovered,” he said.
He noted the belief that the ivory-billed woodpecker is not extinct after all is based on a fleeting, indistinct video image of some kind of woodpecker recorded in 2004 in the Big Woods of Arkansas. No other sightings have been reported.
He also noted than no one has ever found a Bigfoot carcass.
“All organisms die; they don’t just go away,” Klemek said. “You’d think someone someday would find one.”
Evan Hazard, Bemidji State University retired mammalogist, also expressed doubt about the Bigfoot’s existence.
“I just don’t know,” he said. “My background in mammalogy makes me skeptical, not expert. My inclination is to say we really don’t have good evidence.”
Hazard said proof would be a clear photo matched with footprints at the same site – multiple pieces of overlapping evidence.
Search continues
Sherman said the research would go on. He said he believes the Bigfoot is intelligent and perfectly at home in the woods.
“That’s why they’re so elusive,” he said. “They know the woods better than any hunter because they live it.”
One thing the hunters agree on is that even if they could produce a carcass for examination, they wouldn’t shoot a Bigfoot.
“Absolutely not – no way,” said Tim. “I asked my sons would they shoot it, and they said no. It has every right to live.”
“I’ve talked to people who’ve had them in their sights and their scopes, and they said they couldn’t pull the trigger,” she Sherman.
He urged anyone who wants to report a Bigfoot sighting or evidence of the creature to call him at 218-308-1451 or Olson at 218-246-8493.
“We’ve got all kinds of equipment, night vision, cameras, listening devices,” Sherman said.
http://www.bemidjipioneer.com/event/article/id/100013967/
N.B. Forrest
December 13th, 2009, 09:38 PM
Interesting. Whatever it is, it's got realistic-looking arms & paws of ape-like dimensions, not that a suit couldn't be made that way.
I'd like to watch the eyes of the guys who reported it as they give an interview. They should also be given a polygraph exam.
Mike in Denver
December 13th, 2009, 10:00 PM
All these photographs of "big foot" look like cheezy 1950s grade B- gorilla movie costumes to me.
Mike
Alex Linder
December 13th, 2009, 10:39 PM
All these photographs of "big foot" look like cheezy 1950s grade B- gorilla movie costumes to me.
Mike
It is clearly looking for Starr, with reproduction its mind. :D
Nah, I agree, this stuff always makes me laugh.
But last time I said that about that famous '60s clip from woodsy California, April and Fred Streed asserted that it had not been debunked. That thread is on here somewhere. I would bet any amount of money Bigfreet don't exist.
Igor Alexander
December 16th, 2009, 07:52 PM
There have been too many instances where animals previously thought to be extinct or not even known to have existed were discovered that I can't categorically rule out that something like bigfoot might exist.
Alex Linder
December 16th, 2009, 08:29 PM
There have been too many instances where animals previously thought to be extinct or not even known to have existed were discovered that I can't categorically rule out that something like bigfoot might exist.
Most of the discoveries are either tiny, or slight variations on existing stocks. Or they're located in inaccessible areas, like the coelacanth. I just don't see how something as big as a Bigfoot could go undiscovered.
Oy Ze Hate
December 16th, 2009, 08:50 PM
I wonder what Bigfoot and Starr's offspring would look like.
Maybe like Chaka?
http://www.aintitcool.com/images2007/chaka.gif
Fred Streed
December 16th, 2009, 09:35 PM
But last time I said that about that famous '60s clip from woodsy California, April and Fred Streed asserted that it had not been debunked. That thread is on here somewhere. I would bet any amount of money Bigfreet don't exist.
That thread is here:
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=78270&highlight=patterson+film
Alex Linder
December 16th, 2009, 10:44 PM
Thanks, Fred. Maybe I'll merge these threads.
Big_Tony
September 23rd, 2012, 02:19 PM
Hello Good People,
I was doing archival research to determine the 1812 navigability of some bayous in Avoyelles & St. Landry parishes back in 1996. I was looking at newspapers from the town of Marksville printed in 1835. There was an article that detailed alleged sightings of a large bipedal apeman that stunk to the high heavens. This really surprised me. However at the time I had to move on and just made a brief note of this article.
I don't know. Could it be a feral negroid whose mother was impregnated by a gorilla then brought to North America? LOL. We may never know what the hell these things are.
Big Tony
Leonard Rouse
September 23rd, 2012, 02:34 PM
Hello Good People,
I was doing archival research to determine the 1812 navigability of some bayous in Avoyelles & St. Landry parishes back in 1996. I was looking at newspapers from the town of Marksville printed in 1835. There was an article that detailed alleged sightings of a large bipedal apeman that stunk to the high heavens. This really surprised me. However at the time I had to move on and just made a brief note of this article.
I don't know. Could it be a feral negroid whose mother was impregnated by a gorilla then brought to North America? LOL. We may never know what the hell these things are.
Big Tony
Found him!
http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Jordan+Jefferson+LSU+Media+Day+OtUwlitZu2Jl.jpg
Alex Linder
September 23rd, 2012, 06:38 PM
If Bigfoots existed, just imagine how much crap they would produce. Yet no one ever talks about finding bigfoot spoor in the forest. Nor has anyone found a Bigfoot-sized toilet. Nor any evidence they scoop their own poop.
Itz all about usin' the noggin, folks. All about.
ATiii
September 24th, 2012, 05:59 AM
If Bigfoots existed, just imagine how much crap they would produce. Yet no one ever talks about finding bigfoot spoor in the forest. Nor has anyone found a Bigfoot-sized toilet. Nor any evidence they scoop their own poop.
Itz all about usin' the noggin, folks. All about.
I believe Bigfoots are also a queer sexual fantasy. Queers have a sick desire to be sodomized by hairy Goliaths like Bigfoot.
Alan
Alex Linder
November 5th, 2012, 10:08 PM
Latest 'Bigfoot sighting' racks up 2m hits on YouTube (even though camera turns away at the key moment)
By Daily Mail Reporter
5 November 2012
Comments (22)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/05/article-2228245-15DC73F0000005DC-611_638x353.jpg
Rumours of large hairy ape-like creatures roaming through the forests of North America have sparked curiosity and debate for decades.
And the latest possible sighting of Bigfoot by Beard Card on a camping trip with three of his siblings in Provo Canyon, Utah, has triggered just as much interest.
Mr Card says he spotted what appeared to be a black bear shuffling about behind trees near Squaw Peak and Little Rock Canyon last week.
Scroll down for video
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2228245/Latest-Bigfoot-sighting-racks-2m-hits-YouTube--isnt-shame-camera-turns-away-key-moment.html
Steven L. Akins
November 6th, 2012, 05:44 AM
Latest 'Bigfoot sighting' racks up 2m hits on YouTube (even though camera turns away at the key moment)
By Daily Mail Reporter
5 November 2012
Comments (22)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/11/05/article-2228245-15DC73F0000005DC-611_638x353.jpg
Rumours of large hairy ape-like creatures roaming through the forests of North America have sparked curiosity and debate for decades.
And the latest possible sighting of Bigfoot by Beard Card on a camping trip with three of his siblings in Provo Canyon, Utah, has triggered just as much interest.
Mr Card says he spotted what appeared to be a black bear shuffling about behind trees near Squaw Peak and Little Rock Canyon last week.
Scroll down for video
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2228245/Latest-Bigfoot-sighting-racks-2m-hits-YouTube--isnt-shame-camera-turns-away-key-moment.html
It's a bear:
http://www.turtletrack.org/Issues01/Co07142001/Art/Black_Bear_standing.jpg
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2500/4232143789_42469c63b4_z.jpg?zz=1
Crowe
November 6th, 2012, 12:59 PM
I was looking at newspapers from the town of Marksville printed in 1835. There was an article that detailed alleged sightings of a large bipedal apeman that stunk to the high heavens.
Sounds like a nigger to me. Maybe one escaped from a local plantation?
Robert Ransdell
November 11th, 2012, 01:17 PM
If you have some time to waste and need a good laugh you should check out this show on the Animal Planet cable channel "Finding Bigfoot". The whole show is 4 dimwits walking around the woods howling trying to get a response from "Bigfoot", reacting to any sound in the woods at night as if it was a Bigfoot, and generally acting as if the things are as known to science as deer and bears - they just make up supposed behaviors and such on the fly - it is really a hoot to watch.
A couple of other observations from a pro-White point of view.
1- It is amazing how this nonsense can air where they are leaving it open to interpretation and debate on whether Bigfoot exists, when there is really no evidence of it at all, and yet discussion and debate of the Jewish question is forbidden to go anywhere near the Jewvision even though you have all the evidence and facts that back up Jewish supremacism being at the root of the world's decline. Of course I know there is no way the Jew is going to blow the whistle on themselves but it is a glaring thing to observe with shows like this, while I am not completely convinced the show is not some running joke or gag - the dimwits involved, headed by some guy named Matt Moneymaker (I mean really, is this show just a gag) seem to be completly convinced and do not even question if they exist, in fact claiming they are virtually everywhere in the US.
2- They have had a couple shows where they have got big groups of people, 50 or more, to go out and hunt for evidence of the "elusive creature" in the woods or in a state park. Pretty sad that people, all of these being White folks in rural areas, will dedicate time and effort toward this crap and yet they will not take the time to attend and take part in rallies or demonstrations for their people.
Robert Ransdell
November 11th, 2012, 01:25 PM
Here is a short clip. On a subsequent show they admit the image in the thermo shot was of a horse - drat, skunked again...lol
Finding Bigfoot- Encountering a Swamp Ape? - YouTube
Alex Linder
November 12th, 2012, 01:54 PM
Instead of running shows about the Mossadists (and other Zionists) behind '9/11,' the jews prefer to run shows about psychics, Bigfoots, lake monsters, and all kinds of other pseudo-scientific garbage. I wonder why.
Mack
November 13th, 2012, 06:01 PM
Instead of running shows about the Mossadists (and other Zionists) behind '9/11,' the jews prefer to run shows about psychics, Bigfoots, lake monsters, and all kinds of other pseudo-scientific garbage. I wonder why.
That's why we have 200 + channels on TV;bemuse the simpleton.
Bret Masterson
November 13th, 2012, 10:57 PM
Here is a short clip. On a subsequent show they admit the image in the thermo shot was of a horse - drat, skunked again...lol
Finding Bigfoot- Encountering a Swamp Ape? - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHqh49A_lw8)
(1:47) Intrepid reporting from Matt Moneymaker, founder B.F.R.O. Honestly I wouldn't buy a used car from a guy named "Moneymaker" much less a Bigfoot story.
Bigfoot is kind of the misanthrope I'd like to meet up with, but he disappoints from lack of evidence, or apparently a sense of humor.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.