I always knew sugar (cane sugar) was bad, I just didn't realize how bad untill I started searching where it comes from, and lo and behold! it's origins & mainstream introduction are jewish to the very core.

what tipped me off was when I came across a list as long as your arm of all the detrimental effects of sugar.

http://www.healingdaily.com/detoxification-diet/sugar.htm

So then it got me thinking, hmm... wait a minute! if this shits so bad, I wonder who's behind it's origins? so I followed the rat's trail, and as with near all detrimental things, what do you know, I find a whole nest of kikes!

It all makes sense to me now, being a rabid tribe of bandits, cutthroats and assassins since their inception, they would have had advanced knowledge of all known poisons.

As far back as the middle ages, one of the sole jewish industries was the cultivation of sugarcane

From the Encyclopedia Judaica, vol. 15, pp. 487-88
'The Cairo Genizah records reveal that making and selling sugar from sugarcane was one of the most common occupations of Jews in the Middle Ages'

'Sugar refineries were often in Jewish hands. Jews are mentioned as exporters of sugar from Crete in the 15th century. When sugar began to be used for everyday consumption (15th century), Marranos [secret Jews] played a leading role in introducing sugarcane cultivation to the Atlantic islands of Madeira, the Azores, the Cape Verde Islands, and Sao Tome and Principe in the Gulf of Guinea, and in the 16th century to the Caribbean Islands. They also brought the cultivation of sugarcane trom Madeira to America'

Most Americans don't realize that the transatlantic slave trade was driven by the sugar trade.

So there you have it folks.

Cut out the jew (sugar) from your diet completely, and you'll be a happier, healthier Aryan.

Already done, I haven't eaten sugar knowingly for a while now. I use artificial sweeteners, which incidentally save me money as they cost 0.99p per pack, they last about a month. For that same time period the cost of sugar would be around £6.00. Check out the healthy smile :D

Already done, I haven't eaten sugar knowingly for a while now. I use artificial sweeteners, which incidentally save me money as they cost 0.99p per pack, they last about a month. For that same time period the cost of sugar would be around £6.00. Check out the healthy smile :D

Most artificial sweeteners have aspartame in them. If Yankee Jim was alive he would have told you about that, since he suffered from affects of aspartame poisoning. Aspartame was pushed by Donald Rumsfeld who invested his own capital in its production and pushed to have it approved as a sweetener and substitute for sugar, even though it is harmful for humans (white people).

As for white sugar, it is made and processed the same as poppy is processed into heroin. I think that says enough. Having the jews own the majority of this industry is one more reason to stay away from it.

To paraphrase Al Pacino in the movie The Scent Of A Woman: " Sugar Is Shit. Use Honey".

Most artificial sweeteners have aspartame in them. If Yankee Jim was alive he would have told you about that, since he suffered from affects of aspartame poisoning. Aspartame was pushed by Donald Rumsfeld who invested his own capital in its production and pushed to have it approved as a sweetener and substitute for sugar, even though it is harmful for humans (white people).

As for white sugar, it is made and processed the same as poppy is processed into heroin. I think that says enough. Having the jews own the majority of this industry is one more reason to stay away from it.

To paraphrase Al Pacino in the movie The Scent Of A Woman: " Sugar Is Shit. Use Honey".

Thanks for the heads up. It appears though that I am alright with my brand (http://www.mikeleedesign.com/sweeteners.html). The company seems to produce Aspartame and Saccharin based sweeteners and according to the pack, my choice is free from Aspartame, and the other is free from Saccharin.

I read somewhere that Aspartame is used because some people find a bitter after taste with Saccharin.

Thanks for the heads up. It appears though that I am alright with my brand (http://www.mikeleedesign.com/sweeteners.html). The company seems to produce Aspartame and Saccharin based sweeteners and according to the pack, my choice is free from Aspartame, and the other is free from Saccharin.

I read somewhere that Aspartame is used because some people find a bitter after taste with Saccharin.

Either way, natural honey is the way to go.

Either way, natural honey is the way to go.

Honey is waaay too expensive for my budget. Cost is a factor in my choice, unfortunately.

Splenda is a better choice for artificial sweetener. It is made from actual sugar, bound up in another molecule - well soemthing like that.

Splenda is a better choice for artificial sweetener. It is made from actual sugar, bound up in another molecule - well soemthing like that.

If it can beat 0.99p per month then I am interested but I doubt it will. Splenda looks a good choice if you cook, I don't cook and only use sweetener in coffee and tea.

If it can beat 0.99p per month then I am interested but I doubt it will. Splenda looks a good choice if you cook, I don't cook and only use sweetener in coffee and tea.In the US, Splenda (sucralose) and Nutrasweet (aspartame) are packaged and priced almost identical.

There are a few diet sodas I buy that use splenda. I always thought the reason so few use Splenda was because it costs more than Nutrasweet. Maybe it merely costs more to manufacture products with it. Who knows. Diet Rite , and Waist Watcher are the 2 brands.

I just wish I'd had the good sense not to eat sugar from childhood. Why do we do these stupid things like fill our mouths with trash like sugar when there is no need. It seems like life is one long line of mistakes and lessons learned sometimes.

Splenda is a better choice for artificial sweetener. It is made from actual sugar, bound up in another molecule - well soemthing like that.From a website:
The active ingredient in Splenda starts as pure cane sugar but is chemically altered [using chlorine] to create a compound that contains no calories, according to McNeil (Nutritionals). The final product contains no sugar.Personally, I prefer Splenda. It's the only sweetener that tastes like sugar and leaves no nasty after taste.

Either way, natural honey is the way to go.

If you use honey, make sure it's raw, unheated honey, otherwise it's no better than sugar, actually worse.

Honey is a simple sugar

There are 4 classes of simple sugars which are regarded by most nutritionists as "harmful" to optimal health when prolonged consumption in amounts above 15% of the carbohydrate calories are ingested: Sucrose, fructose, honey, and malts.Some of you may be surprised to find honey here. Although honey is a natural sweetener, it is considered a refined sugar because 96% of dry matter are simple sugars: fructose, glucose and sucrose. It is little wonder that the honey bear is the only animal found in nature with a problem with tooth-decay (honey decays teeth faster than table sugar). Honey has the highest calorie content of all sugars with 65 calories/tablespoon, compared to the 48 calories/tablespoon found in table sugar. The increased calories are bound to cause increased blood serum fatty acids, as well as weight gain, on top of the risk of more cavities.

Pesticides used on farm crops and residential flowers have been found in commercial honey. Honey can be fatal to an infant whose immature digestive tracts are unable to deal effectively with Botulinum Spore growth. What nutrients or enzymes raw honey does contain are destroyed by manufacturers who heat it in order to give it a clear appearance to enhance sales. If you are going to consume honey, make sure it is raw, unheated honey. Good to use in special cures, but not as an every day food. It is not much better than white or brown sugar.