Jewish Popes were the origin of the Papal Stool. The purpose of this device was for the Pope to dangle his male member down through a hole in the seat so someone else could make sure he wasn't circumcised. There were a rash of Jewish Popes who snuck in during the era of the Crusades a millennium ago. Among other achievements these Crusades fatally weakened the other major Christian (i.e. white) state in Europe, the Byzantine Empire.

The Crusades themselves left Europe in a weakened condition to face the subsequent Asiatic onslaught of Genghiz Khan's Mongols and the Otttoman Turks (close cousins of the Khazar Turks). We seem to be going through this cycle once again. 'Christendom', defined as white people of European descent, have again dissipated their military strength in campaigns disguised under ideological banners but in fact serving other races' material interests. And again the result is to leave 'Christendom' in a weakened military condition vis a vis the Central Asiatics and Mongols.




When I use the word 'Jew', I am referring to a religious group. When I use the word 'jew', I refer to a biological group. Thus it is possible to be a Catholic and a jew as is suspected of the present Pope whose mother's maiden name has been listed as Katz.. (Many past Popes have been jews.) Catholic Cardinal Lustiger said, " I am a Christian but I will always remain a jew." (For the nit-pickers, this quote might not be letter by letter.) I also understand that 2/3 of the inhabitants of Israel are non religious.

Thanks Duce for breaching one of my fave topics!

No doubt the postconciliar Popes have been dancing to the tune of the Jews, but I disagree about the Crusades. Crusades were against the Arabs mostly who were in control of the Caliphate at that time. The "Asiatic onslaught" you refer to came later under the Ottoman Turks. At the time of the Crusades, Turks were weak and the armies of the Germans waded through the Turks like water.

Later the Turks were far more powerful. I dont know the details of how and why but I doubt the asskissing their grandparents received en route to Jerusalem helped them get any stronger.

Moreover, the Papal diplomacy that went into organizing the Crusades, was later instrumental in organizing various "multinational" European resistance against the Mohammedan Turks such as relief of the siege of Vienna by Jan Sobieski.

Plus if all those knights had been stuck in Europe they would have been cutting each others throats instead of Arab and Jew throats instead. LOL

Not to mention there were a few ausrottungs along the way like the Rhineland.....

interesting website Jarl. never seen it before. why does he call the Klan cross and blood drop the "Templar cross?"

[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]Thanks Duce for breaching one of my fave topics!

No doubt the postconciliar Popes have been dancing to the tune of the Jews, but I disagree about the Crusades. Crusades were against the Arabs mostly who were in control of the Caliphate at that time. The "Asiatic onslaught" you refer to came later under the Ottoman Turks. At the time of the Crusades, Turks were weak and the armies of the Germans waded through the Turks like water.

Later the Turks were far more powerful. I dont know the details of how and why but I doubt the asskissing their grandparents received en route to Jerusalem helped them get any stronger.

Moreover, the Papal diplomacy that went into organizing the Crusades, was later instrumental in organizing various "multinational" European resistance against the Mohammedan Turks such as relief of the siege of Vienna by Jan Sobieski.

Plus if all those knights had been stuck in Europe they would have been cutting each others throats instead of Arab and Jew throats instead. LOL

Not to mention there were a few ausrottungs along the way like the Rhineland.....[/QUOTE]
The causes of imperialism are hunger, greed and opportunity. In some cases, these underlying motives have been cloaked in racial and/or religious pretexts, but the results belie these pretexts, nearly every time. The Mongols were proud of who they were, but they were not too proud to race-mix with conquered peoples, nor to adopt their religions. The fierce Norsemen were no different, for they also interbred with people they conquered, spoke their languages and adopted their religions. Religious wars resulted in the same bottom line: the adulteration of races and religion, as we have seen with all the varieties of Christianity and Islam. If the European conquest of the Western Hemisphere had been truly "racist", there would not be any "Indians", nor Blacks, and certainly no mongrel mixtures of either.



THE ANNIHILATION OF THE SEMITE RACE


Aryan vs. Semite, Aryan vs.Aryan.http://www.dowz.net/pdf/annihilation.pdf