http://www.jameshartforcongress.com/prometheus/eugenics.htm

http://www.jameshartforcongress.com/index.php?menu=1

Why in the chapter "favored races" does he write race with brackets ("race")?. Is he trying to imply that race is not a valid construct?

No byline so we can see which mud or mindwashed White who claims selective breeding (used by farmers for thousands of years) is "phony science".
http://www.abc24.com/news/state/story.aspx?content_id=46A8C495-AF28-4244-BE41-46F313C2B2D1

Eugenics Candidate Expected Loss In Congressional Race
Posted: 11/2/2004 10:42:12 PM

A Republican congressional candidate who vowed to keep "less favored races" from reproducing lost soundly Tuesday, but tried to put a good spin on the loss. James Hart said his campaign in Tennessee's 8th Congressional District gave him a wide audience for his beliefs on eugenics and "biological ethics." "I never expected to win. I was running to try to promote my ideas," Hart said. "I still cannot believe I got as much publicity as I did. I've been sending my book out since 1990 and nobody paid any attention." Hart was soundly defeated by Democratic incumbent John Tanner. With about 60 percent of the vote counted, Tanner had 75 percent of the total. "I don't think this fellow represents the mainstream thought in this district, either Democratic or Republican," Tanner said from his headquarters in Union City in the northwest corner of the state. The largely rural district includes most of northwest Tennessee, from just north of Memphis to Kentucky and east to Clarksville. Hart said from his rural home near the Tennessee River that he plans to run for Congress again in 2006. He ran as an independent in 2002. Hart is a champion of eugenics, the phony science that led to a movement in the early 20th century to sterilize the "unfit." About 65,000 people were sterilized nationwide. With no opposition in the primary, he won the Republican nomination and became an embarrassment for the state GOP.