View Full Version : So, are you saying that Arabs were the superior race
racists_suck
November 15th, 2008, 08:50 AM
in the Middle Ages? They were more 'civilised' than the Europeans then. They where also more advanced in medicine and took care of their peronal hygiene better.
The Wandering Jew
November 15th, 2008, 08:57 AM
in the Middle Ages? They were more 'civilised' than the Europeans then. They where also more advanced in medicine and took care of their peronal hygiene better.
Arabs are scum. The Ottomans were/are far more civilized.
diabloblanco92
November 15th, 2008, 08:58 AM
in the Middle Ages? They were more 'civilised' than the Europeans then. They where also more advanced in medicine and took care of their peronal hygiene better.
The "Arabs" in the Middle Ages were nearly all White Levantines, Persians or Amazigh. Their societies went to hell when racial mixture with their Black slaves occurred. Why do you think Egypt or Motocco never returned to their previous glories?
diabloblanco92
November 15th, 2008, 09:02 AM
Arabs are scum. The Ottomans were/are far more civilized.
THe places of the Middle East not effected by Black racial mixture were destroyed by the Ottomans by neglect and nearly became depopulated. The Ottomans were only interested in Anatolia and the Balkans and neglected their other lands
Why do you think the population of Palestine declined from several million under the Byzantines to 300000 by the late 19th Century?
The Wandering Jew
November 15th, 2008, 09:10 AM
The "Arabs" in the Middle Ages were nearly all White Levantines, Persians or Amazigh. Their societies went to hell when racial mixture with their Black slaves occurred. Why do you think Egypt or Motocco never returned to their previous glories?
Very interesting, if true.
Donnie in Ohio
November 15th, 2008, 09:22 AM
in the Middle Ages? They were more 'civilised' than the Europeans then. They where also more advanced in medicine and took care of their peronal hygiene better.
You of course have zero proof of any of these claims, like every other "anti" you just heard them somewhere and automatically regurgitate it as absolute fact.
I wasn't alive during the time frame in question. I have no first-hand knowledge the medical/hygiene conditions of the time. Neither do you.
Ask yourself if you would rather have a heart-bypass operation performed in a hospital in Switzerland or Lebanon?
Screw the Middle Ages, what's the personal hygiene of blacks in Africa like today?
Didn't oh so-oppressed multi-millionaire rapper Kanye West just piss on the floor backstage at an awards show?
Dude, if you are going to pin your argument for the equality of the races on the personal hygiene of non-Whites, pack a carb-intensive lunch because it's going to be one loooong fucking day of trying to somehow justify the actions of the little darlings even here in the 21rst century, let alone in any sort of historical context.
You see the Mexican crapping in a suburban mall flower-pot YouTube? Find me one where the public defecation is committed by a White and we'll talk.
Blackmanofamerikkka
November 15th, 2008, 09:36 AM
YouTube - THE MOORS WERE BLACK
Sándor Petőfi
November 15th, 2008, 10:07 AM
The "Arabs" in the Middle Ages were nearly all White Levantines, Persians or Amazigh.
Diablo, do you think this one knows what an Amazigh or a Levantine is?
Why do you think Egypt or Motocco never returned to their previous glories?
I'm glad you are now admitting that North Africa is a mongrelised hovel.
in the Middle Ages? They were more 'civilised' than the Europeans then.
I can see your knowledge of history amounts to the you have seen in Hollywood movies and the cursory claptrap you were taught in school. Evidently, you don't even believe what you are saying. Writing 'civilised' and all. Speaking of being "ahead" or "behind" in "civilisation" is meaningless outside of an assumed paradigm of historical "linearity" and "civilisation" as a mere mechanical product of "human progress". But I'm not even going to attempt to discuss the organic meaning of "civilisation" and the cyclical nature of the historical phenomenon with you.
They where also more advanced in medicine
Certainly, they had access to Greek texts and built upon these before Western Europeans did. But I wouldn't call anything before the last two hundred years much of an advancement of anything. Medicine before the development of the science of biology in the nineteenth century rested upon Greek misconceptions which the Arabs never supplanted.
and took care of their peronal hygiene better.
Inaccurate. Bathing was a normal part of medieval life in Europe. So were public bathouses. This shouldn't surprise anyone, being that washing is a natural tendency in humans. Negroids not being humans. Obviously, bathing in the winter months was problematic. Dangerous in fact. But then so is using ones water supplies to wash ones body when one is an Arab nomad wandering the deserts of North Africa. Which is why they didn't.
Sándor Petőfi
November 15th, 2008, 10:12 AM
Isn't spamming against the rules? Time to flush this nigger brat. Before he begins posting "interracial porn".
General_Lee
November 15th, 2008, 10:16 AM
No stronger evidence for the negro's abject inferiority exists than its self-delusional attempts to claim the accomplishments of other ancient races and civilizations as its own. (paraphrased) -- Original Source Unknown
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.