14 MAR 05

Hail D.R.! Many thanks for your letter of FEB 25th & the informative enclosures. Yes, I agree that things are heating up fast. Jewsradio reported today that a ‘notorious’ Central American gang has been hacking their victims to death with their machetes – on the east coast of the U.S.A. Strangely enough, these bandidos primitivos entered the U.S.A. illegally, but the Bushites have assured us that the illegals come merely to slave at jobs & low wages which no self-respecting American nigger or White would want. Well, 1917 Russian experience shows signs of appearing here in Usreal: the population is being gradually terrorized by the criminal class, as well as the government bodies ostensibly created to stop terrorism. The article on “The Hidden Face of Terrorism” refers. The Red Terror had its Cheka, as you wisely observe, & so do we! I agree that the manure is about to hit the ventilator. Every day, I marvel that local commerce still functions; that there is no general looting; that the Post Office still carries mail, & that there is no knock on my door by ZOG-thugs. Of course, I do not exaggerate my importance, for they would have to be awfully hard up for victims if they were to visit me. I suppose they could seize my typewriter ribbons & shred my writing paper, as well as confiscate my postage stamps. That would sure fix me! But seriously, I feel that we are living on borrowed time, so we’d better make the most of it. With terror, we merely need privation to put us into the status of the Russians of 1917. Oh yes, the Russian armies were bogged down at the front, so they could not help the Russian people in Russia. Sounds similar to the U.S. situation, eh? Russia was also conquered by non-Russians, so the similarity is painfully obvious.

Jewsradio admitted that Israel sells China everything it wants, in regard to military technology, so Europe is merely getting late into the act. As one commentator said today: The U.S. really fears that Europe may be getting into a rapprochement with China, in which the U.S. may be squeezed out, commercially, diplomatically & militarily. Europe would like to sell its Airbus to China, which seems to be designed with the China market in mind, to a better extent than the Boeing version. I cannot fathom why the U.S. wants to get into the Taiwan trap, more than it has been already. If psychology is worth anything, it is wise to consider the Chinese concept of “face” in terms of its national reputation, regardless of others’ ignorance of that concept. From a Chinese point of view, much ‘face’ or reputation is at stake over the Taiwan issue, both for China & for the U.S.A. In such a game, whoever backs down on Taiwan, or is perceived to back down, loses ‘mucha cara’ or lots of ‘face’ . The Chinese goal seems obvious & straight forward, whereas the U.S. objectives seem inscrutable & devious: China wants Taiwan because it belongs to China, just as the fleeing Chiang Kai Shek said that China belonged to Taiwan. In other words, both sides believed in a “one China” policy. But, the U.S. does not, for no discernible reason. Methinks that now is NOT the time to pick a fight with China, least of all over Taiwan. The problem could quite easily be resolved by face-saving diplomacy: the U.S. could let the Taiwanese know that they should make a ‘Hong Kong’ arrangement with China, for the U.S. would not commit its military forces in a war with China over Taiwan. A quid pro quo could be Taiwan in exchange for Chinese pressure on North Korea’s nuke-rattling dictator. Then both China the U.S.A. could come out winners, with big, smiling faces, & great world press! The Chinese, Taiwanese & U.S. leaders could even receive Nobel Peace Prizes. Such a deal! I see no reason why Israel would object to that, unless they want the U.S. to fight China, in addition to Iraq, Syria & Iran. Since I put nothing past the jews, it may well be that they intend to destroy the U.S.A., & present its rotting carcass to China, on behalf of Israel. This would be typical of the jews who have always betrayed their foremost hosts & benefactors in this fashion, according to their own boasts, throughout history. No, I do not think they are crazy as much as they are criminals, who hate & envy their hosts. In their bankster support for Hitler, as well as their backing of FDR, Churchill & Stalin, the jews did so because they wanted a war, & Germany had to be strong enough to fight in one, at least in the beginning. Hitler surprised them by attacking the USSR instead of Britain. The jews hate Hitler because he did not follow their script, as their other puppets did.

As you say, the New America will call for people, the likes of whom we have never seen, who have the skills & determination to prioritize their behavior in terms of their objectives, ruthlessly, & without deviation or respite or remorse. The weak shall fall by the wayside, as they should & as they must, for the preservation of the White Remnant.

As you mention, mob tactics can be handled by ZOG-tech, but what is difficult to handle is “flea tactics”, such as we have seen in the recent courtroom shoot out. What we have yet to see in practice are the tactics used by T.E. Lawrence: sharp strikes against infrastructure over great areas tie down lots of troops, & thus render them both expensive & ineffective. The reason this has not been done is (1) The resistance is both ineffective, in the ZOG’s pockets OR, just plain stupid (2) Pierce did not want HIS air-conditioner to conk out, nor his fridge! T.E. Lawrence wrote that it was much easier to attack the enemy’s metal, rather than his manpower, & that is still a valid strategic policy. In our case, ‘metal’ may include oil, electric power & airports, NOT his office buildings! When things become serious, these strategic targets are most likely to be attacked, & ZOG is unlikely to do it. In “The Chosen One”, airport control towers are destroyed, rather than aircraft, a much more cost-effective method than those used so far. Railroads, strategic highway tunnels & bridges, pipelines, powerlines, &c. are very hard to defend & very easy to destroy. Strategic targets are not people, not even large numbers of them, unless their leaders/rulers get zapped along with their sheeple. In general, the means by which people live are strategic targets. As I wrote back in 1976, one can distinguish between ZOG-ops & genuine insurgents by target-selection. It’s cui bono time! None of Pierce’s targets are strategic, which made me doubt his bona fides. As I say, I marvel that our infrastructure still functions without such drastic interventions by insurgents, for it is overloaded & deteriorating apace. As I wrote years ago: “Here Comes the Revolution, Ready or Rot!” I gave that as a speech in Toronto, at a well-attended skinhead meeting, at which Paul Fromm spoke, also. Then we were driven out by the decibel bombardment inflicted upon us by George Burdi alias Eric Hawthorne whose skinhead band performed the atrocity. Paul Fromm lost his teaching job for speaking at the same podium as “Eric Thomson, a Nazi theoretician”, to quote The Toronto Sun story. I was wearing very conservative clothes: brown shirt, black tie, tan military jacket, brown trousers & black Rhodesian officer’s dress boots, minus armband, so I looked like a Hitler Youth leader in mufti. I guess I didn’t fool anyone. Ha! The clothing was all Rhodesian issue, but I always seem to look like a stormtrooper & I’m often mistaken for a cop. As the old song goes, “the kid can’t help it” or whatever. So much for being myself & coming as I am. Poor Paul! I guess he now lives off donations, which also help him to publish his C-FAR & CAFE newsletters, as well as fund-raising for the now deported Zündel. “It’s a livink,” as da jooz would say.

Many thanks, also, for the download on the likely assassination attempt on the Italian reporter. Indeed, the U.S. ZOG has lots to hide. The author of the download may not know that the U.S.A. & Britain used incendiaries against civilian populations throughout World War II, from phosphorus to napalm. The scary thing is what it is willing to use against civilians in its present undeclared war in The Middle East, along with torture. The same methods can be used against Americans, ZOG willing, because the only justice they fear would be meted out by those who can defeat the ZOG. They don’t give a fig for justice, otherwise, as is obvious. I used to sign off Samisdat letters in Toronto: Yours, as always, for Truth, Freedom & Justice, & I said that I was willing to give the jews ten times the amount of justice, since they like to have ‘more’ of anything, as long as it’s free! Even the use of dum dum bullets by U.S. police against U.S. citizens is permitted, but not, supposedly, against foreign troops in a war, since dum dum bullets are prohibited by the Hague & Geneva Conventions. U.S. citizens are ‘special’, eh? Remember when Bushy declared that the illegal treatment accorded “illegal combatants” would apply to foreigners, only, & not to U.S. Citizens? Then along came that hispanic U.S. citizen, who’d blabbed about a “dirty bomb”, Padilla, & who now resides in illegal federal custody. If a corrupt society is known by the number of its laws, then a tyranny is known by the number of laws the regime breaks. As you say, everything is in place for terror on behalf of tyranny in the U.S.A., so we now await the pressing of the button to put the ZOG’s terror-tyranny into operation, which could occur at any moment. It may sound like a cop-out, but I’m glad I have no hostages. This is not a country where I’d like to have loved ones. I agree that the Catholic Church may reveal its true colors, after the death of the present jewish Pope (mother: Wanda Katz). The Church worships quantity rather than quality, as you observe. The Whites have gone so long without thinking, that I agree it is unlikely for them to adopt a race-saving ideology. Their last chance, if they have one, will be to adopt a leader, but in the end, they must save themselves. Hitler expressed what was on people’s minds. For some reason, they needed him to save themselves, for Hitler could not do that for them. It worked then, so perhaps it may work again. I’m sure we shall see in our lifetimes, for the time Our Race has is very short.

Clinton may be around for a while longer, but his life dangles on a thread, as we know. Yes, I receive regular issues of B.W. magazine. Many thanks! They have great survival tips. Indeed, the jews prefer dishonorable White men as their shabez Goyim, just as they state in The Protocols. By the way, if you’d like a copy, I’d be happy to send you one. Let me know! ORION! E.T.

--------------------

The Chosen One

http://www.faem.com/books/

--------------------

The Strategy of Target-Selection

http://www.faem.com/eric/2000/et013.htm

--------------------

Here Comes the Revolution, Ready or Not!

http://www.faem.com/eric/2000/et006.htm

--------------------

Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.

The article below from The Guardian is extremeley interesting. The Taliban are the best guerilla fighters in the world, and they seem to know their T.E. Lawrence strategy well. Or are they reading Eric Thomson's letters on VNN-Forum?

Compare the quote from the Guardian article with the quote from Eric's letter to D.R.:

Guardian:
”However, independent observers took a less sanguine view. Amyas Godfrey, associate fellow of the London-based Royal United Services Institute, called it a ”hugely successful attack” on a soft target. It was a propaganda success which added to existing pressure on the US-Pakistan relationship, he said.

”There were concerns in Washington that militants targeting supply convoys could complicate plans to put more Nato troops into the region. ”It is certainly an Achilles’ heel to Afghan operations, or at least a potential one,” said Daniel Markey, a former state department official and a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.”

Eric:
”What we have yet to see in practice are the tactics used by T.E. Lawrence: sharp strikes against infrastructure over great areas tie down lots of troops, & thus render them both expensive & ineffective.”

”T.E. Lawrence wrote that it was much easier to attack the enemy’s metal, rather than his manpower, & that is still a valid strategic policy. In our case, ‘metal’ may include oil, electric power & airports, NOT his office buildings! When things become serious, these strategic targets are most likely to be attacked, & ZOG is unlikely to do it. In “The Chosen One”, airport control towers are destroyed, rather than aircraft, a much more cost-effective method than those used so far. Railroads, strategic highway tunnels & bridges, pipelines, powerlines, &c. are very hard to defend & very easy to destroy. Strategic targets are not people, not even large numbers of them, unless their leaders/rulers get zapped along with their sheeple. In general, the means by which people live are strategic targets. As I wrote back in 1976, one can distinguish between ZOG-ops & genuine insurgents by target-selection. It’s cui bono time!”

--------------------

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/dec/09/afghanistan-nato-supply-routes

Convoy attacks trigger race to open new Afghan supply lines
• Race to open new Afghan supply lines
• Nato seeks northern route as resurgent Taliban exposes ’achilles heel’
Nato countries are scrambling for alternative routes as far afield as Belarus and Ukraine to supply their forces in Afghanistan, which are increasingly vulnerable to a resurgent Taliban, the Guardian has learned.
Four serious attacks on US and Nato supplies in Pakistan during the past month, including two in the past three days, have added to the sense of urgency to conclude pacts with former Soviet republics bordering Afghanistan to the north.
Nato is negotiating with Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to allow supplies for Nato forces, including fuel, to cross borders into Afghanistan from the north. The deal, which officials said was close to being agreed, follows an agreement with Moscow this year allowing Nato supplies to be transported by rail or road through Russia.
The deal could allow more fuel for Nato forces to be transported from refineries in Baku, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan. Most of the 75m gallons of fuel estimated to be used by Nato forces annually in Afghanistan comes from refineries in Pakistan.
Germany and Spain, whose troops are based in more peaceful northern Afghanistan, have negotiated separate bilateral air transport agreements with Russia.
Nato officials said yesterday that the organisation is negotiating with Ukraine and Belarus for a land route which, though long, would avoid Pakistan and the pirates of the Gulf of Aden.
The officials yesterday played down the strategic significance of Sunday’s attack in Peshawar, the Pakistani town on the main transit route through the Khyber pass. But independent analysts described it as a well-planned move, with 100 militants torching more than 100 trucks.
Yesterday, in a second attack, gunmen from the Pakistani Taliban attacked a second site on the same road near Peshawar, destroying 50 containers of supplies destined for Nato forces in Afghanistan.
A week ago, another 22 trucks carrying food supplies were attacked in Peshawar. Last month, some 60 Taliban fighters hijacked a convoy of trucks travelling in daylight through the Khyber pass.
In all, 145 vehicles, trailers, containers, and two armoured personnel carriers were destroyed in Sunday’s attack, according to Peshawar police.
”We have such a huge amount of material coming through, it hasn’t really made a dent,” one official said. ”We’re not short of anything because of what has happened in Pakistan.” A British defence official called the attacks ”militarily insignificant”.
However, independent observers took a less sanguine view. Amyas Godfrey, associate fellow of the London-based Royal United Services Institute, called it a ”hugely successful attack” on a soft target. It was a propaganda success which added to existing pressure on the US-Pakistan relationship, he said.
There were concerns in Washington that militants targeting supply convoys could complicate plans to put more Nato troops into the region. ”It is certainly an Achilles’ heel to Afghan operations, or at least a potential one,” said Daniel Markey, a former state department official and a fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Nato hires private contractors to carry fuel, food and other supplies to troops fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan. Most are local Pashtun businesses, so the Taliban could risk a backlash if they continue to target convoys. Pakistan is likely to face growing pressure to provide more troops to protect depots and convoys.
More than 70% of the supplies for Nato troops in Afghanistan land at the port of Karachi and are taken to Peshawar, then through the Khyber pass to Kabul.
British and Canadian troops based in the southern Afghan provinces of Helmand and Kandahar receive many of their supplies on a route from Karachi, through Quetta and across the border at the frontier town of Chaman. It is a road where travellers are vulnerable to robbers, Taliban fighters and drug runners. There are also protection rackets.
More urgent or valuable supplies to Nato forces in Afghanistan are flown in to the Bagram air base near Kabul, and the Kandahar base, which can take large C-17 transport aircraft used by the US and Britain. Hercules aircraft, the workhorse of the RAF, can also land at the British base Camp Bastion, in Helmand province.
But even with extra land routes from the north, more attacks on the overland routes to southern Afghanistan could exacerbate Nato’s existing lack of ”strategic airlift”, UK officials said yesterday.

”What we have yet to see in practice are the tactics used by T.E. Lawrence: sharp strikes against infrastructure over great areas tie down lots of troops, & thus render them both expensive & ineffective.”

What goes around comes back around. WW2 allies performed an unconventional war while the Axis captured the region intact such as France.


The British and U.S went on the carpet bombing spree with its10,000 b 52’s destroyed infrastructure, facilitated axis defeat-no way in hell the Soviets would have survived ww2.

Note in the first quote how The Guardian and the independent observer Amyas Godfrey uses the phrase "soft target" when they are referring to military supplies, while T. E. Lawrence and Eric Thomson uses the much more accurate word "metal".

This is a good example of something Eric often writes about in his letters. It is called "cognitive dissonance", an efficient way to make the goyim confused and paralyze their thinking abilities by using contradictions and absurdities.

George Orwell noted the same thing when he worked in British propaganda during World War II. That's why he coined Big Brother's phrases "War is Peace", "Freedom is Slavery", and "Love is Hate" in his masterwork 1984.