Lars Redoubt
December 10th, 2008, 02:26 AM
12 AUG 06
Hail Chad! It was great to receive your letter of 9 AUG. Nice zoggies! It appears as if your RIP course zoggies openly admit that men are neither “created equal” nor brought up equal. It would therefore seem that they are no longer trying a “one size fits all” approach to indoctrination, but may be tailoring their subject matter to the individual. I’d consider that a compliment. Whenever you get some kinky-kookie question like why you dislike sex offenders & child-molestors, I’d pull the old jew-jitsu by asking them why they would ask such a question in the first place. Remember: the questions they ask you say a lot about them. Why should anyone LIKE persons whose behavior is both immoral & illegal, as well as harmful to trusting & defenceless children? Someone who asks such a question should be asked if he or she has a taste for cannibalism or sado-masochism, by way of getting acquainted. Is Count Dracula in charge of your “RIP” course?
It is useful to learn a cause & effect correlation between one’s thoughts & actions, beliefs & behavior. What applies to your experiences applies equally to your instructors’ experiences. Given the same set of factors, two different individuals might behave similarly, & given different sets of factors, the same individual would likely behave differently. Although I remain the same person, for example, my behavior differs considerably at home, when there is no fire alarm sounding, as when there is smoke in the corridors & the fire alarm is ringing! As Henry David Thoreau wrote: “The unexamined life is not worth living.” You are actually privileged to examine your own experiences in writing, for few people ever have such an opportunity. Most people are “leading lives of quiet desperation,” as Thoreau noted in his time, around the 1840s. We are all self-taught. We can learn from others’ experiences, & from our own, in “the school of hard knocks.” I find it cheaper to learn as much as I can from others’ experiences, so I can avoid hard knocks in my own life. Even so, I’ve had a number of surprises, which I have been lucky to have survived, so far.
One question I would ask of myself & of others is: what factors in my American life led me to wind up in prison? Another question is, why does the USA have the largest prison population, proportionally, in the world? I do not suggest that our environment is entirely at fault & that we are entirely blameless ‘victims’ of our society. I just wonder why U.S. society produces such a high proportion of prison inmates. Maybe we could compare the prison populations of Colombia & South Africa, which are notably rife with criminal activity. In Colombia, alleged felons are often “shot while attempting to escape.” In South Africa, the felons are often the police themselves. Then, we have Iraq... Iraqis don’t live long enough to land in jail, so their prison population is minimal. To be ‘guilty’ is to be a Sunni or a Shi-ite Moslem. It would be reasonable to ask why one has NOT been locked up, after living a number of years in the USA! Since I spent most of my adult life outside the USA, that may be one reason I have not been a guest of the ZOG-gulag. In 1969, when I became one of “America’s Least Wanted,” I was also banned from entering any Soviet Bloc country, including Cuba, so I avoided residence in their ZOG-gulags as well! As a long-time “word-criminal,” I’ve led a gulagless existence, but I do not feel deprived in the least!
As you say, your ”RIP” course sounds like fun, & your feed-back should be interesting. If that’s what they mean by “rigorous,” I’d say, “bring it on!” to quote our King George (Bush) II. I understand he has lived to regret those words, but not as much as our troops!
I’m happy to correct some Zionist propaganda in regard to “Semite.” A Semite is an Arab, nobody else. Arabs are usually believers in Semitic religions such as Judaism, Christianity & Islam. The majority of Arabs are Moslems. Most jews, Christians & Moslems are NOT Arabs. Therefore, most jews, Christians & Moslems are NOT Semites, although they have Semitic religions. Semite = Arab, nothing else. The jews who stole “Israel” from the Palestinians, that is, the Semites, come from Russia. They converted to Judaism around 700 A.D. Semitic jews are called Sephardim. The jews who came from the Soviet Union & Europe are Khazars of Turkish/Black/Mongol extraction, who are called Ashkenazim. Black jews are Falashim, & there are also Indian & Chinese jews, who would not be Semites, regardless of their Semitic cult. Moslems are divided into 3 main branches: Sunnis, Shi-ites & Suffis. All branches consider the others ‘heretics’, like Catholics & Protestants. Most Moslems are Sunnis or Shi-ites. In The Middle East, as distinguished from Asia, Arabs are mainly Sunnis & non-Arab Iranians are mainly Shi-ites. In Iraq, the Sunni Arab minority ruled, via Saddam Hussein, over the Shi-ite majority, as well as the Kurds, who now have virtual independence from the former Iraq, as they always wanted. Iraq no longer exists, thanks be to ZOG. By toppling Saddam, the USA brought on the civil war it feared to mention, which is a turf battle between Sunnis & Shi-ites, with the U.S. forces caught in between. Israel wanted Iraq destroyed, so Bush & his Zionist (jew-supremacist) ’neo-cons’ obliged, regardless of the cost in lives to the USA. Our Iraq experience should teach us that ‘getting what we want’ can be disastrous, especially if it’s what Israel wants! If Shi-ites & Sunnis make peace, the ZOG’s days may be numbered. Even so, the Shi-ites of Hizbollah seem to be giving Izzy-ZOG a very hot time.
As I understand from my studies of history, the ancient peoples of “The British Isles,” including Ireland, spoke Gaelic or Celtic, as do the Bretons of France. These Irish/Scottish/Welsh/French inhabitants have been found as far east as NW China, where there are thousands of plaid-wearing, fair, blond White mummies called The Tokharians, whose civilization can be traced from Central Asia to India.
From what I gather, the ancient Britons of present-day England were also related to the Celtic-speakers. One archeologist, Colin Renfrew, believes that Western Civilization originated in NW Europe, rather than the alleged “Cradle of Civilization” in The Middle East, in the area of present-day Iraq. We are talking in terms of tens of thousands of years, not the brief & recent biblical time-frame of 2000 B.C. or less. As I understand, the only slaves brought into Britain were those of their own households & members of the legions, for the Roman enterprise, as admitted by Tacitus, was to conquer & enslave all inhabitants of invaded territories. This means that the Romans did not replace the native populations with their own, but came in to rule existing populations. When the Romans left Britain, Germanic peoples invaded, that is, non-Celtic speakers, specifically, Danes, Jutes, Angles, Saxons & Norse. The Angles may have given their name to “England,” & the Saxons gave their name to Sussex (South Saxony), Wessex (West Saxony) & Essex (East Saxony). Apparently, the Angles & Saxons got on well together, so we refer to “Anglo-Saxons” today, both of whom are German tribes. The Scots refer to them disparagingly as “Sassanachs,” Gaelic for Saxon. In 1066, Viking conquerors of Normandy, in France, invaded England & conquered the Saxon king at The Battle of Hastings. If I recall correctly, the Saxons had just returned from defeating other Viking invaders in the north, so the Normans (Northmen) gave the Saxons a one-two punch. Since William the Conqueror spoke French, that language became England’s official language in the English court, partially replacing Latin. That’s why so many French words are found in English, which remains a Germanic language. A BBC-TV feature on “The English Language” said that English was the “people’s language”, not the official Latin or French of the English court. English resulted from trade between Vikings & Germans. Trade languages are called “lingua francas”, such as that used in the Mediterranean, Swahili in Africa, & pidgin English in Asia. English dropped the German endings of words, so as to be understandable to the Scandinavians, relying on word-order to convey explicit meanings otherwise conveyed by the German endings. It is notable that Gaelic had little or no influence on the development of English! English is basically a Low German dialect, similar to Frisian, which is still spoken around Holland.
I have encountered no more eloquent a speech than that of British leader, Calgacus, who rallied his forces against the Romans. As you say, the British defeat was due to lack of skill & discipline, not lack of enthusiasm! Skillful use of terrain was made by Hermann to defeat Varus’ legions, rather than discipline, for example, just as the French & their Indian allies defeated Braddock’s British colonial force in the forest. Romans & 18th century Europeans required open ground on which to mass their forces’ firepower, or in the Roman case, their javelins, arrows & infantry. The British commander of Quebec was out-numbered by the American rebels, so he placed his troops in the open, where their massed & disciplined fire power could defeat the less-disciplined Americans. That’s why Quebec remained in The British Empire after The American Revolution. Had the British gone into the woods, they’d have lost Quebec. Had the Americans remained in the woods, they might have worn the British down, but they chose to fight on the plain. The Americans could see that the British were out-numbered, but their firepower made up for their lack of troops. Morale, elan, enthusiasm, &c. are important for warriors, but they do not substitute for military skill & discipline, as the French began to learn in World War I, for morale does not make one bulletproof. Imagine the bloody futility of advancing over open ground into enemy machinegun & artillery fire! So much for “the spirit of the bayonet.” In U.S. Army Basic Training, we were taught bayonet fighting & trench warfare in 1960, almost as if World War I had never happened. Pretty scary! Well, at least we did not parade across no man’s land. We crawled on our bellies, with our knees & elbows. Thanks, but no thanks. One Commie singer said of The Spanish Civil War: “How come we lost? We had the best songs!” As Mark Twain said, humor is a powerful weapon. As I say, memory is tyranny’s worst enemy. All the best. DOWZ! ORION! & 88!
Eric
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.
Hail Chad! It was great to receive your letter of 9 AUG. Nice zoggies! It appears as if your RIP course zoggies openly admit that men are neither “created equal” nor brought up equal. It would therefore seem that they are no longer trying a “one size fits all” approach to indoctrination, but may be tailoring their subject matter to the individual. I’d consider that a compliment. Whenever you get some kinky-kookie question like why you dislike sex offenders & child-molestors, I’d pull the old jew-jitsu by asking them why they would ask such a question in the first place. Remember: the questions they ask you say a lot about them. Why should anyone LIKE persons whose behavior is both immoral & illegal, as well as harmful to trusting & defenceless children? Someone who asks such a question should be asked if he or she has a taste for cannibalism or sado-masochism, by way of getting acquainted. Is Count Dracula in charge of your “RIP” course?
It is useful to learn a cause & effect correlation between one’s thoughts & actions, beliefs & behavior. What applies to your experiences applies equally to your instructors’ experiences. Given the same set of factors, two different individuals might behave similarly, & given different sets of factors, the same individual would likely behave differently. Although I remain the same person, for example, my behavior differs considerably at home, when there is no fire alarm sounding, as when there is smoke in the corridors & the fire alarm is ringing! As Henry David Thoreau wrote: “The unexamined life is not worth living.” You are actually privileged to examine your own experiences in writing, for few people ever have such an opportunity. Most people are “leading lives of quiet desperation,” as Thoreau noted in his time, around the 1840s. We are all self-taught. We can learn from others’ experiences, & from our own, in “the school of hard knocks.” I find it cheaper to learn as much as I can from others’ experiences, so I can avoid hard knocks in my own life. Even so, I’ve had a number of surprises, which I have been lucky to have survived, so far.
One question I would ask of myself & of others is: what factors in my American life led me to wind up in prison? Another question is, why does the USA have the largest prison population, proportionally, in the world? I do not suggest that our environment is entirely at fault & that we are entirely blameless ‘victims’ of our society. I just wonder why U.S. society produces such a high proportion of prison inmates. Maybe we could compare the prison populations of Colombia & South Africa, which are notably rife with criminal activity. In Colombia, alleged felons are often “shot while attempting to escape.” In South Africa, the felons are often the police themselves. Then, we have Iraq... Iraqis don’t live long enough to land in jail, so their prison population is minimal. To be ‘guilty’ is to be a Sunni or a Shi-ite Moslem. It would be reasonable to ask why one has NOT been locked up, after living a number of years in the USA! Since I spent most of my adult life outside the USA, that may be one reason I have not been a guest of the ZOG-gulag. In 1969, when I became one of “America’s Least Wanted,” I was also banned from entering any Soviet Bloc country, including Cuba, so I avoided residence in their ZOG-gulags as well! As a long-time “word-criminal,” I’ve led a gulagless existence, but I do not feel deprived in the least!
As you say, your ”RIP” course sounds like fun, & your feed-back should be interesting. If that’s what they mean by “rigorous,” I’d say, “bring it on!” to quote our King George (Bush) II. I understand he has lived to regret those words, but not as much as our troops!
I’m happy to correct some Zionist propaganda in regard to “Semite.” A Semite is an Arab, nobody else. Arabs are usually believers in Semitic religions such as Judaism, Christianity & Islam. The majority of Arabs are Moslems. Most jews, Christians & Moslems are NOT Arabs. Therefore, most jews, Christians & Moslems are NOT Semites, although they have Semitic religions. Semite = Arab, nothing else. The jews who stole “Israel” from the Palestinians, that is, the Semites, come from Russia. They converted to Judaism around 700 A.D. Semitic jews are called Sephardim. The jews who came from the Soviet Union & Europe are Khazars of Turkish/Black/Mongol extraction, who are called Ashkenazim. Black jews are Falashim, & there are also Indian & Chinese jews, who would not be Semites, regardless of their Semitic cult. Moslems are divided into 3 main branches: Sunnis, Shi-ites & Suffis. All branches consider the others ‘heretics’, like Catholics & Protestants. Most Moslems are Sunnis or Shi-ites. In The Middle East, as distinguished from Asia, Arabs are mainly Sunnis & non-Arab Iranians are mainly Shi-ites. In Iraq, the Sunni Arab minority ruled, via Saddam Hussein, over the Shi-ite majority, as well as the Kurds, who now have virtual independence from the former Iraq, as they always wanted. Iraq no longer exists, thanks be to ZOG. By toppling Saddam, the USA brought on the civil war it feared to mention, which is a turf battle between Sunnis & Shi-ites, with the U.S. forces caught in between. Israel wanted Iraq destroyed, so Bush & his Zionist (jew-supremacist) ’neo-cons’ obliged, regardless of the cost in lives to the USA. Our Iraq experience should teach us that ‘getting what we want’ can be disastrous, especially if it’s what Israel wants! If Shi-ites & Sunnis make peace, the ZOG’s days may be numbered. Even so, the Shi-ites of Hizbollah seem to be giving Izzy-ZOG a very hot time.
As I understand from my studies of history, the ancient peoples of “The British Isles,” including Ireland, spoke Gaelic or Celtic, as do the Bretons of France. These Irish/Scottish/Welsh/French inhabitants have been found as far east as NW China, where there are thousands of plaid-wearing, fair, blond White mummies called The Tokharians, whose civilization can be traced from Central Asia to India.
From what I gather, the ancient Britons of present-day England were also related to the Celtic-speakers. One archeologist, Colin Renfrew, believes that Western Civilization originated in NW Europe, rather than the alleged “Cradle of Civilization” in The Middle East, in the area of present-day Iraq. We are talking in terms of tens of thousands of years, not the brief & recent biblical time-frame of 2000 B.C. or less. As I understand, the only slaves brought into Britain were those of their own households & members of the legions, for the Roman enterprise, as admitted by Tacitus, was to conquer & enslave all inhabitants of invaded territories. This means that the Romans did not replace the native populations with their own, but came in to rule existing populations. When the Romans left Britain, Germanic peoples invaded, that is, non-Celtic speakers, specifically, Danes, Jutes, Angles, Saxons & Norse. The Angles may have given their name to “England,” & the Saxons gave their name to Sussex (South Saxony), Wessex (West Saxony) & Essex (East Saxony). Apparently, the Angles & Saxons got on well together, so we refer to “Anglo-Saxons” today, both of whom are German tribes. The Scots refer to them disparagingly as “Sassanachs,” Gaelic for Saxon. In 1066, Viking conquerors of Normandy, in France, invaded England & conquered the Saxon king at The Battle of Hastings. If I recall correctly, the Saxons had just returned from defeating other Viking invaders in the north, so the Normans (Northmen) gave the Saxons a one-two punch. Since William the Conqueror spoke French, that language became England’s official language in the English court, partially replacing Latin. That’s why so many French words are found in English, which remains a Germanic language. A BBC-TV feature on “The English Language” said that English was the “people’s language”, not the official Latin or French of the English court. English resulted from trade between Vikings & Germans. Trade languages are called “lingua francas”, such as that used in the Mediterranean, Swahili in Africa, & pidgin English in Asia. English dropped the German endings of words, so as to be understandable to the Scandinavians, relying on word-order to convey explicit meanings otherwise conveyed by the German endings. It is notable that Gaelic had little or no influence on the development of English! English is basically a Low German dialect, similar to Frisian, which is still spoken around Holland.
I have encountered no more eloquent a speech than that of British leader, Calgacus, who rallied his forces against the Romans. As you say, the British defeat was due to lack of skill & discipline, not lack of enthusiasm! Skillful use of terrain was made by Hermann to defeat Varus’ legions, rather than discipline, for example, just as the French & their Indian allies defeated Braddock’s British colonial force in the forest. Romans & 18th century Europeans required open ground on which to mass their forces’ firepower, or in the Roman case, their javelins, arrows & infantry. The British commander of Quebec was out-numbered by the American rebels, so he placed his troops in the open, where their massed & disciplined fire power could defeat the less-disciplined Americans. That’s why Quebec remained in The British Empire after The American Revolution. Had the British gone into the woods, they’d have lost Quebec. Had the Americans remained in the woods, they might have worn the British down, but they chose to fight on the plain. The Americans could see that the British were out-numbered, but their firepower made up for their lack of troops. Morale, elan, enthusiasm, &c. are important for warriors, but they do not substitute for military skill & discipline, as the French began to learn in World War I, for morale does not make one bulletproof. Imagine the bloody futility of advancing over open ground into enemy machinegun & artillery fire! So much for “the spirit of the bayonet.” In U.S. Army Basic Training, we were taught bayonet fighting & trench warfare in 1960, almost as if World War I had never happened. Pretty scary! Well, at least we did not parade across no man’s land. We crawled on our bellies, with our knees & elbows. Thanks, but no thanks. One Commie singer said of The Spanish Civil War: “How come we lost? We had the best songs!” As Mark Twain said, humor is a powerful weapon. As I say, memory is tyranny’s worst enemy. All the best. DOWZ! ORION! & 88!
Eric
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.