Log in

View Full Version : Eric Thomson: Letter to Chad


Lars Redoubt
December 16th, 2008, 01:37 AM
20 OCT 06

Hail Chad! Thanks for your informative & entertaining letter of 17 OCT 06. I appreciate the delays you experience in receiving my mail, which are most likely due to slow zoggie readership, but please bear with them, for they are getting much-needed education. Our motto is “No zoggie left behind,” as El Presidente says. We may as well refer to King George (Bush) II in Spanish, since he appears to favor that language. I note that all voter materials are in Spanish & English in Yakima County. I hear that all voter material must be in Mandarin & English in King County. Neither of these foreign languages is official, but they are treated as such. Perhaps I was out of the Jewnited States when they were made official by ZOG, but I suspect we are seeing another illegal fait accompli, like illegal immigrants. A civics teacher in high school pointed out the need for an “enlightened electorate,’ so citizens could make intelligent decisions at the polls. Imagine if I were an illegal immigrant in Mexico: If I did not speak or read Spanish, what would I know about national issues? I could turn on the news & understand not a word, nor could I read a newspaper, if I spoke no Spanish. How could I vote, if I could not read the election instructions, nor the ballots? In fact, being an illegal immigrant, a Gringo, who wasn’t even supposed to be in Mexico, how could I vote at all? In 1960, I voted in my first U.S. election, in San Francisco. The officials who processed my registration made sure I had valid I.D. & proof of U.S. citizenship. Not so when I registered to vote in Brownest Yakima! It was a joke. I was not required to show proof of anything. I could have given the registrars any name for which I could provide an address & signature. Nor did I need to show any proof of U.S. citizenship. Had I been unable to speak English, they might have provided me with an interpreter, as they do in court proceedings, at tax-payers’ expense, of course. Non-citizens in Mexico are not allowed to vote, work, go on welfare, send their kids to schools, hospitals, or otherwise live off Mexican tax-payers’ money. If illegal aliens are discovered in Mexico, they are punished swiftly & deported, or they will wish they had been deported! I have lived & worked in Mexico, legally, so I can speak from experience. No, I did not vote, because I was not a Mexican citizen. Those racist Mexicans would not permit it, & I certainly don’t blame them. That’s why I can’t understand Gringos, even if I speak English. By the way, the Mexican equivalent of the Nazi Party, La Raza Unida (The United Race) is not deemed “racist” by the Mexicans. Only Gringos can be “racist,” & they will tell you so, just as the jews proclaim.

I’m glad your knowledge of ancient Aryans was reinforced by a happy coincidence, or was it due to the fact that you were looking for such knowledge to begin with? Some people think that ‘we make our luck’ to a great extent. I needed to know how the USA really was, & ZOG taught me what I needed to know. By their deeds, they saved me from discovering, belatedly, that I was nothing more than an academic prostitute, had I completed my doctorate. I consider a teacher who is paid to lie to his students &/or conceal the truth to be a very low form of life, so I would have been ill-suited to become a liar-for-hire. The chief job of most teachers seems to be the passing on of their own ignorance, which is as ZOG wills it. Lying is deemed a useful tool by the Chinese. No wonder they are dubbed the “jews of Asia” by the Japanese, who call themselves the “White men of Asia.”

The enclosures on Einstein reveal that anything he swiped was right, & anything he invented on his own was wrong. He worked as a clerk in a Swiss patents office, so that’s where he swiped others’ scientific discoveries & theories. Being a commie-jew, he got support from his fellow tribesmen in the jewsmedia. With Einstein, what was original was not good & what was good was not original, but shamelessly plagiarized.

Re “String Theory”: I heard an interview with a mathematician. He said that no experiments have succeeded in proving or disproving “String Theory,” which exists in the universe of mathematics, only, as of now. Mathematics is a language which can be used to describe anything, real or unreal, depending on the proclivities of the mathematician. Jewish “science” is noted for reasoning backwards from a desired result. Real science, Aryan science, observes repeatable phenomena, which may be expressed mathematically. The true scientist may desire one outcome of his experiments, rather than another, but truth is important for Aryans, even if it may not be useful at the moment. Math can be used to express truth or lies, as said in the adage: “Figures can lie & liars can figure.” Cheaters called “dry-lab” chemists would use coefficients known as “fudge-factors” to make their fake experiments turn out ‘almost’ perfect, based on perfect theoretical results. Nowadays, fudge-factors are most often used by governments & ‘creative accountants’ for such swindles as Enron & the U.S. census.

There are two kinds of scientific reasoning of which I am aware: deductive & inductive. Deductive reasoning goes from the general to the specific. The oft-used example of this reasoning is expressed as a logical statement: “All men are mortal. Socrates is a man, therefore he is mortal.” Liberals would deem this as “stereotyping,” so they would flunk deductive reasoning.

Inductive reasoning involves observation, often in the form of experiments. It reasons from the specific to the general. If I see one “bird”, I note that it flies. I may see a thousand different birds, all of which can fly, so I may make a hypothesis: All birds can fly, true or false? By further observation & experimentation I test the hypothesis. Eventually, I or someone else, discover that creatures which are deemed birds, like penguins & ostriches, cannot fly. Liberals would start collecting funds for The Penguin Flying Fund, for “a wing is a terrible thing to waste!” I may be reduced to a thesis that “all birds have feathers,” which is, of course, stereotyping all over again. This is why liberals are such bad scientists, since they reason backwards from foregone conclusions, like jews. Things ‘must’ be the way liberals want them to be, no matter how wrong they are.

A professor of epistemology mentioned the unspoken basis for the presumed validity of inductive reasoning: that the future will resemble the past. Chemists think that combining certain quantities of sodium & chlorine under certain circumstances will ‘always’ produce a given quantity of sodium chloride or table salt. I’m sure some mathematician could come up with a formula which calculates a probability that the future won’t resemble the past, & that the trusting chemist who thinks he will make table salt will discover that he has produced “cold fusion” instead! Hey, when you can work with ‘infinity,’ anything can be done with numbers. Liberals live in forlorn hope that, one day, somewhere in the universe, the future will not resemble the past & all their social experiments will be ‘politically-correct.’ The Advent of the Great Pumpkin is more likely, according to my observations. I see unbroken consistency in the fact that human blunders produce human disasters. Science exists to discover Natural Law, among other things, & Natural Law appears to exist to distress liberals, & those who fall for their P.C. twaddle.

Your “Reintegration Program” alias RIP course seems to be treading very cautiously, as if the zoggies in charge have learned the old Chinese advice: “Softly, softly catchee monkey.” It appears that they are trying to learn as much as they can about you to maximize the ‘interfacing’ of their indoctrination program, which may turn out like psychoanalysis, with a high rate of failure. Of course, psychoanalysis is a jew-racket, like usury, designed to be endless, to maximize profit for those who practice it, like the U.S. war in Iraq, not to cure the patient, free the debtor, or ‘win’ the war, which was a defeat for the USA as soon as we started it. The defeat in Iraq will get worse, the longer we stay there. I smell a kosher rat in the zoggies’ emphasis on “family-oriented questions.” I wonder if they intend to do the old sheenie scam of blaming the environment, rather than the individual, who is ‘never’ responsible for his actions. I hear that our ZOG views school kids as ‘things’ to be manipulated, which are not responsible for learning anything. That is the ’responsibility’ of their teachers. When there is no desire to learn on the part of the student, how can that be the fault of the teacher? I wanted to learn, & the teachers only got in my way, since they could not teach. My grandmother had no trouble teaching me the 3 Rs, for she didn’t use jew methods. I learned to memorize my multiplication tables, & I learned to read, by the phonetic method, which she knew, for I could not learn at all with the “look-say” method of “Dick & Jane.” Those fake teachers got paid much more than my grandmother, who could do a much better job, but I WANTED to learn, unlike many of my fellow students. As one of my professors told us eager freshmen: “We are all self-educated.”

It appears that you are teaching your zoggies a course entitled “Chad [---] for Beginners.” Maybe you should charge tuition & test them to see what they’ve learned. Odin is watching, & He must be laughing.

All the best. DOWZ! ORION! 88!

Eric

--------------------

Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.