Lars Redoubt
December 19th, 2008, 06:12 AM
12 JAN 06
Hail Jason! Many thanks for your letter of JAN 4th! You are really lucky to have a comrade who would risk his own life to save you. This makes you a rich man, indeed. We can only win if we stick together. In 1917 Russia, the jew minority was able to take over the whole Russian Empire, because the majority would not stick together. That’s the lesson everyone must learn, & I hope it won’t be too late, as you say. The lesson is also that a team can beat large numbers of individual all-stars, even if the team is small. A team can work together, according to a plan, which has a goal, which all team members agree on. A mob has no such teamwork, plan or goal, so a small team can cut through a mob like a hot knife cuts through butter. The Roman army fought as a team, & they had little trouble in their battles with the bigger, stronger German tribesmen when Rome invaded Germany, after it had conquered the territory now known as France, which is a colony of Algeria today! A German leader who had been in the Roman army, Hermann, knew the Romans’ strength & the Germans’ weakness: The Romans fought as a team & the Germans did not! So Hermann made a plan with other German leaders to defeat the Romans under their commander, Varus, who occupied German territory with 7 legions, if I recall correctly. Hermann’s plan was to get the Romans strung out in ravines & forests, so the Romans could not form up to concentrate their forces. The trick worked & the Roman legions were all chewed up by the German warriors who hit them from every side. Neither Varus nor his legions survived their walk in the woods of Germany! In a one-on-one battle, the smaller Romans could not win over the bigger Germans. In other words, Hermann got the Romans to go where they could not use their teamwork to fight, but where the undisciplined Germans could do what they had always done.
The European armies of the 1700s had tactics similar to the Romans: They fought in formations designed to maximize their firepower, in the open. The British & English colonial soldiers were badly beaten by the French & their Indian allies when the French caught them in the woods, strung out on their line of march, & shot them from concealed positions. The Brits could not concentrate their firepower; they often couldn’t see the enemy, & they could not shoot through trees, even if they could see. Thus was General Braddock defeated by the French & their Indian allies, & George Washington was there to see it. During the American revolution, the Americans tried to seize Quebec. The British force was smaller than the advancing Americans, so the British commander knew what he could do to defeat them: he formed up his men in the open! When the Americans tried to compete with British firepower & discipline, they were defeated, & the British kept Quebec.
T.E. Lawrence (“Lawrence of Arabia”), whose book, “The Seven Pillars of Wisdom,” I read when I was 10 years old, was a great military thinker & doer. The British were trying to defeat & destroy the Turkish Empire in World War I, mainly to seize their oilfields of Kirkuk & Mosul. The Brits had already seized Kuwait from the Turks, before the war began, just as they had taken Egypt, after the Suez Canal was built by the French! That’s where we got our Statue of Liberty. Her real name was Commerce, & she was meant to stand at the entrance of the Suez Canal, which I passed through on my way to India, back in 1966, before it got closed in the 1967 war with Israel. The British did not want a damned French republican statue to mark the entrance of the canal they had (secretly) bought out from under the French, so the Americans were talked into buying it! As P.T. Barnum said, “There’s a sucker horn every minute!” That’s how he made his money, so he sure was right about the American people. “Liberty”, ha! But back to Lawrence: The British were out-numbered, so they couldn’t fight the Turks as they were fighting the Germans on the Western Front. If it came down to bayonet charges, the British would lose. The Arab allies of the British were unsuitable for such bloody, suicidal tactics , & even if they’d taken ground from the Turks, the Arabs couldn’t keep it. The Turks were great soldiers, in defence & offence, & there were plenty of them. Lawrence wrote that he was sick with dysentery, out in the desert, with the Arabs & the camels for company, & he almost wished he could have died, for dysentery is terrible, as I know from experience in Mexico. He had a sort of ‘out of body experience’, as I recall from his book, & he imagined the map of Arabia spread out before him. It showed the major Turkish army at the end of a railroad which ran, I think, from Damascus down to Medina, in present-day Saudi Arabia. It was a vast territory, which even the large number of Turkish forces could not guard, if it became hostile to the Turks, who were entirely supplied by that one railroad: two strips of steel, running through 500 miles of desert. It was then that Lawrence realized the Turks had already lost! Lawrence decided that his tiny forces should attack the Turks’ supply line & not the Turks themselves. By cutting the railroad often enough to prevent the Turks from supplying their 4th Army in Medina with enough food, ammo & equipment for them to renew their advance toward the Suez Canal, Lawrence could make that army his prisoners, without ever seeing them, let alone fighting them! That’s what he did.
When the Turks were defeated at the end of World War I, the British got what they had wanted: the oil-rich area of Kirkuk & Mosul, as well as Basrah, the necessary seaport for tankers laden with the oil. This territory carved out of the former Turkish Empire was called “Iraq”! The British took over a territory full of Kurds, Arabs & Iranians who never got along because of their racial & religious differences. The British figured such diversity would allow them to practice their old imperial tactic of divide & rule, but things worked out differently! Lawrence told the British commanders that the Turks had governed their entire Empire with about HALF the troops with which the British were unsuccessfully ATTEMPTING to govern Iraq! The British also had total airpower & bombed the rebels with poison gas, but the rebellion did not cease. Finally, they appointed a local leader, whose job was to bash heads & keep the oil flowing, just as Saddam had been doing for the USA & the British, until madman Bush overthrew him. What had changed since World War I? The British & their agent, T.E. Lawrence, had propagandized the Arabs, whom they “promised” would achieve self-rule if they helped the British kick out the Turks. Naturally, the British had no intention of keeping their promise, but the Arabs & other former Turkish subjects liked the idea of self-government, so they fought the British to get it. In other words, the Brits were undone by the success of their own propaganda! This idea of self-government eventually destroyed the entire British Empire, as it had helped destroy the Turkish Empire in World War I. To add to this problem was the creation of Israel in 1948. If we look at the result, we can see that Israel stands between the USA, Britain & Middle East Oil. Israel produces no oil, but lots of trouble!
So why would Bozo Bush choose to disrupt our oil supplies from Iraq? At first, it was said that he wanted to rob Iraq of its huge oil supplies, by eliminating Saddam the middle-man. But since we are getting very little oil now, as compared to the oil Saddam had been supplying us, before we got so nasty with him, there was a different reason for the U.S. invasion of Iraq: Israel! Iraq has been #1 on the Israeli hitlist, with Syria & Iran next, but not necessarily in that order. Right now, it looks as if Israel will attack Iran, allegedly in late March of 2006, with the USA sure to go along with it. The danger is that Iran is not alone. China, at least, does not like the idea of a war-torn Iran, any more than it does a war-torn Iraq, for China’s oil supplies are threatened. The USA has lost, merely by invading Iraq on behalf of Israel, & Israel does not care what or how much the USA loses. Neither does Bush! Our invasion of Iraq & our toppling of our puppet-ruler, Saddam, succeeded in starting the present civil war, which will cause Iraq to break up, like the former Yugoslavia. Moreover, the longer the U.S. forces stay there, the more they will bleed. It’s a no-win fight which we lost before we started, for the USA has gained nothing but trouble & casualties from being in Iraq. Some crooks have become very rich from our Iraq Attack, but the American people are suffering now, & their children even more, because of the huge war-debt. As USMC General Smedley Butler declared: “War is a racket!”
So let’s look at the situation in the USA: our military forces are pinned down overseas, & our borders are open to the increasing alien-invasion. We are similar to 1917 Russia, whose armed forces were pinned down on the Eastern Front; the economy was suffering wartime inflation & food-shortages, & the jews were plotting to overthrow the Tsar & take over the Russian Empire. The USA is also a multi-national empire, which is presently being annexed by Mexico, as North America is being rapidly invaded by China. Canada’s second language is now Mandarin Chinese, not French, as before, according to their latest census, & those Chinese get into the USA in increasing numbers, in addition to the mestizo invasion from the south. The USA could actually self-destruct, like Iraq or Yugoslavia, all of a sudden. I am not making a prophecy, but I am considering possibilities, based on such motives as seeking our land, jobs & control over our government. Certainly, the Chinese & the Mexicans want this country, & we appear most willing to give it to them, thanks be to ZOG!
As you wrote, Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently killed before he could blab, may have been a Castro agent, although I understand that he may have been CIA. We must always ask “cui bono?” It is not who pulled the trigger, but who benefitted from the JFK assassination: It was the private, jew-bank called The Federal Reserve. I spent $20 United States Notes before JFK’s murder, but after that, all U.S. currency became Federal Reserve Notes. That’s who benefitted. All the best. DOWZ! & ORION!
Eric
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.
Hail Jason! Many thanks for your letter of JAN 4th! You are really lucky to have a comrade who would risk his own life to save you. This makes you a rich man, indeed. We can only win if we stick together. In 1917 Russia, the jew minority was able to take over the whole Russian Empire, because the majority would not stick together. That’s the lesson everyone must learn, & I hope it won’t be too late, as you say. The lesson is also that a team can beat large numbers of individual all-stars, even if the team is small. A team can work together, according to a plan, which has a goal, which all team members agree on. A mob has no such teamwork, plan or goal, so a small team can cut through a mob like a hot knife cuts through butter. The Roman army fought as a team, & they had little trouble in their battles with the bigger, stronger German tribesmen when Rome invaded Germany, after it had conquered the territory now known as France, which is a colony of Algeria today! A German leader who had been in the Roman army, Hermann, knew the Romans’ strength & the Germans’ weakness: The Romans fought as a team & the Germans did not! So Hermann made a plan with other German leaders to defeat the Romans under their commander, Varus, who occupied German territory with 7 legions, if I recall correctly. Hermann’s plan was to get the Romans strung out in ravines & forests, so the Romans could not form up to concentrate their forces. The trick worked & the Roman legions were all chewed up by the German warriors who hit them from every side. Neither Varus nor his legions survived their walk in the woods of Germany! In a one-on-one battle, the smaller Romans could not win over the bigger Germans. In other words, Hermann got the Romans to go where they could not use their teamwork to fight, but where the undisciplined Germans could do what they had always done.
The European armies of the 1700s had tactics similar to the Romans: They fought in formations designed to maximize their firepower, in the open. The British & English colonial soldiers were badly beaten by the French & their Indian allies when the French caught them in the woods, strung out on their line of march, & shot them from concealed positions. The Brits could not concentrate their firepower; they often couldn’t see the enemy, & they could not shoot through trees, even if they could see. Thus was General Braddock defeated by the French & their Indian allies, & George Washington was there to see it. During the American revolution, the Americans tried to seize Quebec. The British force was smaller than the advancing Americans, so the British commander knew what he could do to defeat them: he formed up his men in the open! When the Americans tried to compete with British firepower & discipline, they were defeated, & the British kept Quebec.
T.E. Lawrence (“Lawrence of Arabia”), whose book, “The Seven Pillars of Wisdom,” I read when I was 10 years old, was a great military thinker & doer. The British were trying to defeat & destroy the Turkish Empire in World War I, mainly to seize their oilfields of Kirkuk & Mosul. The Brits had already seized Kuwait from the Turks, before the war began, just as they had taken Egypt, after the Suez Canal was built by the French! That’s where we got our Statue of Liberty. Her real name was Commerce, & she was meant to stand at the entrance of the Suez Canal, which I passed through on my way to India, back in 1966, before it got closed in the 1967 war with Israel. The British did not want a damned French republican statue to mark the entrance of the canal they had (secretly) bought out from under the French, so the Americans were talked into buying it! As P.T. Barnum said, “There’s a sucker horn every minute!” That’s how he made his money, so he sure was right about the American people. “Liberty”, ha! But back to Lawrence: The British were out-numbered, so they couldn’t fight the Turks as they were fighting the Germans on the Western Front. If it came down to bayonet charges, the British would lose. The Arab allies of the British were unsuitable for such bloody, suicidal tactics , & even if they’d taken ground from the Turks, the Arabs couldn’t keep it. The Turks were great soldiers, in defence & offence, & there were plenty of them. Lawrence wrote that he was sick with dysentery, out in the desert, with the Arabs & the camels for company, & he almost wished he could have died, for dysentery is terrible, as I know from experience in Mexico. He had a sort of ‘out of body experience’, as I recall from his book, & he imagined the map of Arabia spread out before him. It showed the major Turkish army at the end of a railroad which ran, I think, from Damascus down to Medina, in present-day Saudi Arabia. It was a vast territory, which even the large number of Turkish forces could not guard, if it became hostile to the Turks, who were entirely supplied by that one railroad: two strips of steel, running through 500 miles of desert. It was then that Lawrence realized the Turks had already lost! Lawrence decided that his tiny forces should attack the Turks’ supply line & not the Turks themselves. By cutting the railroad often enough to prevent the Turks from supplying their 4th Army in Medina with enough food, ammo & equipment for them to renew their advance toward the Suez Canal, Lawrence could make that army his prisoners, without ever seeing them, let alone fighting them! That’s what he did.
When the Turks were defeated at the end of World War I, the British got what they had wanted: the oil-rich area of Kirkuk & Mosul, as well as Basrah, the necessary seaport for tankers laden with the oil. This territory carved out of the former Turkish Empire was called “Iraq”! The British took over a territory full of Kurds, Arabs & Iranians who never got along because of their racial & religious differences. The British figured such diversity would allow them to practice their old imperial tactic of divide & rule, but things worked out differently! Lawrence told the British commanders that the Turks had governed their entire Empire with about HALF the troops with which the British were unsuccessfully ATTEMPTING to govern Iraq! The British also had total airpower & bombed the rebels with poison gas, but the rebellion did not cease. Finally, they appointed a local leader, whose job was to bash heads & keep the oil flowing, just as Saddam had been doing for the USA & the British, until madman Bush overthrew him. What had changed since World War I? The British & their agent, T.E. Lawrence, had propagandized the Arabs, whom they “promised” would achieve self-rule if they helped the British kick out the Turks. Naturally, the British had no intention of keeping their promise, but the Arabs & other former Turkish subjects liked the idea of self-government, so they fought the British to get it. In other words, the Brits were undone by the success of their own propaganda! This idea of self-government eventually destroyed the entire British Empire, as it had helped destroy the Turkish Empire in World War I. To add to this problem was the creation of Israel in 1948. If we look at the result, we can see that Israel stands between the USA, Britain & Middle East Oil. Israel produces no oil, but lots of trouble!
So why would Bozo Bush choose to disrupt our oil supplies from Iraq? At first, it was said that he wanted to rob Iraq of its huge oil supplies, by eliminating Saddam the middle-man. But since we are getting very little oil now, as compared to the oil Saddam had been supplying us, before we got so nasty with him, there was a different reason for the U.S. invasion of Iraq: Israel! Iraq has been #1 on the Israeli hitlist, with Syria & Iran next, but not necessarily in that order. Right now, it looks as if Israel will attack Iran, allegedly in late March of 2006, with the USA sure to go along with it. The danger is that Iran is not alone. China, at least, does not like the idea of a war-torn Iran, any more than it does a war-torn Iraq, for China’s oil supplies are threatened. The USA has lost, merely by invading Iraq on behalf of Israel, & Israel does not care what or how much the USA loses. Neither does Bush! Our invasion of Iraq & our toppling of our puppet-ruler, Saddam, succeeded in starting the present civil war, which will cause Iraq to break up, like the former Yugoslavia. Moreover, the longer the U.S. forces stay there, the more they will bleed. It’s a no-win fight which we lost before we started, for the USA has gained nothing but trouble & casualties from being in Iraq. Some crooks have become very rich from our Iraq Attack, but the American people are suffering now, & their children even more, because of the huge war-debt. As USMC General Smedley Butler declared: “War is a racket!”
So let’s look at the situation in the USA: our military forces are pinned down overseas, & our borders are open to the increasing alien-invasion. We are similar to 1917 Russia, whose armed forces were pinned down on the Eastern Front; the economy was suffering wartime inflation & food-shortages, & the jews were plotting to overthrow the Tsar & take over the Russian Empire. The USA is also a multi-national empire, which is presently being annexed by Mexico, as North America is being rapidly invaded by China. Canada’s second language is now Mandarin Chinese, not French, as before, according to their latest census, & those Chinese get into the USA in increasing numbers, in addition to the mestizo invasion from the south. The USA could actually self-destruct, like Iraq or Yugoslavia, all of a sudden. I am not making a prophecy, but I am considering possibilities, based on such motives as seeking our land, jobs & control over our government. Certainly, the Chinese & the Mexicans want this country, & we appear most willing to give it to them, thanks be to ZOG!
As you wrote, Lee Harvey Oswald, who was conveniently killed before he could blab, may have been a Castro agent, although I understand that he may have been CIA. We must always ask “cui bono?” It is not who pulled the trigger, but who benefitted from the JFK assassination: It was the private, jew-bank called The Federal Reserve. I spent $20 United States Notes before JFK’s murder, but after that, all U.S. currency became Federal Reserve Notes. That’s who benefitted. All the best. DOWZ! & ORION!
Eric
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.