Log in

View Full Version : Ron Paul's Zionism Comes Out in this Debate


Brian Foley
December 29th, 2008, 04:04 PM
Ron Paul has again made it crystal clear that he is a Zionist. In fact, Ron Paul boasts that he was the only one to defend Israel when Israel illegally bombed Iraq in the below YouTube video @ 6:30 min.

QKjhNa6PGLk
Republican Debate Transcript, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (http://www.cfr.org/publication/15249/)

PAUL: I think they, one time in the '80s, took care of a nuclear reactor in Iraq. I stood up and defended Israel for this. Nobody else did at that time.

But we need to recognize they deserve their sovereignty, just as we deserve our sovereignty.

Is Ron Paul looking forward to an Israeli attack on Iran?

Ron Paul again stated that his policy of cutting off aid to Israel will benefit Israel because he will also cut off all Arabs, whom he defines in the broadest terms as if enemies of Israel. Paul does not state that Israel has proven itself to be the enemy of Arab nations. Ron Paul wants to benefit Israel by letting them do as they please to the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iranians, etc. and hopes that by cutting off aid to Arabs, whom he credits with receiving three times the aid which Israel receives, he will empower Israel to dominate the Arab nations.

Mike Parker
December 30th, 2008, 11:53 AM
Ron Paul wants to benefit Israel by letting them do as they please to the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iranians, etc. and hopes that by cutting off aid to Arabs, whom he credits with receiving three times the aid which Israel receives, he will empower Israel to dominate the Arab nations.

Paul is either a fool or he's deliberately goofing with them. Israel already dominates the Arab countries (Egypt, Jordan) that get US aid. Accepting Israel's domination was the price of the aid. The problem is Iran, which receives no US aid and in fact is under US and EU sanctions. So Israel (we) will have to dominate Iran the way they (we) dominated Iraq. No matter how much Paul fawns on the kikes, it is unacceptable to them that a white man should have an independent say on war and peace for the US. How much a Halfrican can get away with, we shall see.

Robert Bandanza
December 30th, 2008, 01:08 PM
Why hasn't Mazzone spammed this thread yet, but every single other recently answered ones? He is probably on a mission to disrupt this forum in the name of Ron Paul. What a joke!

Is he trying to become the top poster via spamming? It is uncalled for.

Fuck Ron Paul and this subforum should be removed!

Robert Bandanza
December 30th, 2008, 01:14 PM
Macońie je polski nedoczełowęk.

Tommy Vercetti
December 31st, 2008, 11:59 AM
Be wary of those pushing CONstitutionalism.

Vanguard Reb
January 2nd, 2009, 05:19 AM
Ron Paul wants to benefit Israel by letting them do as they please to the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iranians, etc.

As opposed to the extreme strictures placed upon Israel now by...... whom?

Paul represents without a doubt the most courageous step in the right direction that the MSM has permitted even the smallest voice. In fact, this particular stand of his (cutting Israel off) may well be the primary reason his voice is consistently marginalized and ridiculed in the media.

The Wandering Jew
January 2nd, 2009, 08:00 AM
Why hasn't Mazzone spammed this thread yet, but every single other recently answered ones? He is probably on a mission to disrupt this forum in the name of Ron Paul. What a joke!

Is he trying to become the top poster via spamming? It is uncalled for.



Yeah, he pisses me off too. He should be banned as a troll & spammer.

Robert Bandanza
January 2nd, 2009, 09:25 AM
Yeah, he pisses me off too. He should be banned as a troll & spammer.

I didn't ask you.

-JC
October 25th, 2009, 05:47 AM
Since there is no clearly defined and agreed goal for WN, it is not so easy to define those standing in the way of progress down the field. Cutting-off the usual suspects' ability to ruin individuals and nations financially, it would seem, would be helping WN causes.

Ask yourselves why the most effective man in Federal government, in this regard, since Andrw Jackson, is being so viciously attacked simply because he is proposing cutting-off foreign aid to Israel, regardless of how he tries to sell it? Could it be that some posting here don't like this? Hello?

And what is the political value of disparaging one who is virtually a Black deity, Martin Luther King, instead of acknowledging he built an effective and admirable political machine? Do you think that would help Ron Paul in his instant goal of eliminating the private central bank, the Federal Reserve System, under the current system of government?

Do you find nothing admirable about the effectiveness of Israel against its enemies? You don't have to agree with or like someone to respect them. Give the devil his due. Think for yourself. Listen to Ron Paul for yourself and decide who you'd rather direct the executive branch of American government today.

-JC
October 25th, 2009, 05:58 AM
It would be unexplainable for this to officially disappear down the Memory Hole. So, it is out there in plain sight and the concentration has been on dumbing-down, shortening the attention spans, etc., of those who might study history rather than repeat its mistakes.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/andrewjackson
Andrew Jackson

More nearly than any of his predecessors, Andrew Jackson was elected by popular vote; as President he sought to act as the direct representative of the common man.


Born in a backwoods settlement in the Carolinas in 1767, he received sporadic education. But in his late teens he read law for about two years, and he became an outstanding young lawyer in Tennessee. Fiercely jealous of his [and his wife's] honor, he engaged in brawls, and in a duel killed a man who cast an unjustified slur on his wife Rachel.


Jackson prospered sufficiently to buy slaves and to build a mansion, the Hermitage, near Nashville. He was the first man elected from Tennessee to the House of Representatives, and he served briefly in the Senate. A major general in the War of 1812, Jackson became a national hero when he defeated the British at New Orleans.


In 1824 some state political factions rallied around Jackson; by 1828 enough had joined "Old Hickory" to win numerous state elections and control of the Federal administration in Washington.


In his first Annual Message to Congress, Jackson recommended eliminating the Electoral College. He also tried to democratize Federal officeholding. Already state machines were being built on patronage, and a New York Senator openly proclaimed "that to the victors belong the spoils. . . . "


Jackson took a milder view. Decrying officeholders who seemed to enjoy life tenure, he believed Government duties could be "so plain and simple" that offices should rotate among deserving applicants.


As national politics polarized around Jackson and his opposition, two parties grew out of the old Republican Party--the Democratic Republicans, or Democrats, adhering to Jackson; and the National Republicans, or Whigs, opposing him.


Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and other Whig leaders proclaimed themselves defenders of popular liberties against the usurpation of Jackson. Hostile cartoonists portrayed him as King Andrew I.


Behind their accusations lay the fact that Jackson, unlike previous Presidents, did not defer to Congress in policy-making but used his power of the veto and his party leadership to assume command.


The greatest party battle centered around the Second Bank of the United States, a private corporation but virtually a Government-sponsored monopoly. When Jackson appeared hostile toward it, the Bank threw its power against him.


Clay and Webster, who had acted as attorneys for the Bank, led the fight for its recharter in Congress. "The bank," Jackson told Martin Van Buren, "is trying to kill me, but I will kill it!" Jackson, in vetoing the recharter bill, charged the Bank with undue economic privilege.


His views won approval from the American electorate; in 1832 he polled more than 56 percent of the popular vote and almost five times as many electoral votes as Clay.


Jackson met head-on the challenge of John C. Calhoun, leader of forces trying to rid themselves of a high protective tariff.


When South Carolina undertook to nullify the tariff, Jackson ordered armed forces to Charleston and privately threatened to hang Calhoun. Violence seemed imminent until Clay negotiated a compromise: tariffs were lowered and South Carolina dropped nullification.


In January of 1832, while the President was dining with friends at the White House, someone whispered to him that the Senate had rejected the nomination of Martin Van Buren as Minister to England. Jackson jumped to his feet and exclaimed, "By the Eternal! I'll smash them!" So he did. His favorite, Van Buren, became Vice President, and succeeded to the Presidency when "Old Hickory" retired to the Hermitage, where he died in June 1845.

Brian Foley
November 6th, 2009, 03:52 PM
Ask yourselves why the most effective man in Federal government, in this regard, since Andrw Jackson, is being so viciously attacked simply because he is proposing cutting-off foreign aid to Israel, regardless of how he tries to sell it? Could it be that some posting here don't like this? Hello?
Calling for an end to aid for Israel today is meaningless, as Israel, thanks to being funded by America since 1948, is a 1st World nation, cutting off aid now that Israel is a creditor nation is nothing. How about Ron Paul saying they should stop the preferential trade agreement with Israel where Israel creams out of America some $24 billion annually with a lopsided trade deficit, that is the real aid to Israel.

reo
November 9th, 2009, 09:37 AM
Kemp the resident BNP SA refugee, loves Ron Paul.

http://www.arthurkemp.com/?p=412

Kemp calls all the rest of us cancers and likes Paul and "democratic" White nationalism. Democratic being a euphemism for Zionism and Jewishness.

Kemp of the BNP attacks Nazis and KKK and everyone basically not on the Yids payroll.

I would say the BNP leadership and people like Wilders trying to deflect people's racial anger away from the Jew to some convenient scapegoat are the real cancer. Of course Kemp talks like a Jew,pretending to have the real interests of the White race at heart, perhaps he is part Yid with that Amsterdam Meisner background and allegations that he tells people in secret that he is really a Zionist. No need to be secret about it Arthur , it's is obvious to us all.

What is the obsession with insulting the southern Europeans about? There are several websites that have come into existence just because of Kemp. People like this Greek Dienkes who thinks Kemp is a Nordicist. No Kemp is not a Nordicist. He is a Neo-Con type. Kosherised "White" racism.
Splitting the White race ,setting Norts against Southerners, democracy,Islam not the yids as the main threat, just a constant string of Jew memes.

Now traditionalists in Europe would have let things be but these Griffins aand Kemps attack them, purge them, they want the whole of racism as a tool for the Jews. They try to tell you it is in your interest, clever tactics, look how successful we are etc. As if anyone who is not Kosher can get elected.

Xuxalina Rihhia
November 11th, 2009, 01:45 AM
Ron Paul was NEVER one of us! He's a fucking Kike-worshiping Freemason like the rest! I actually have more respect for Hellary, because she is more open about her evil!

IsraHELL Fail!
Ameriqaeda Fail!
Christianity Fail!
goDD Fail!

UlickOconnor
December 11th, 2009, 04:23 PM
Ron Paul is not the way to go.

Robert Bandanza
December 11th, 2009, 04:26 PM
Ron Paul is not the way to go.

Agreed, touché.

Bassanio
December 11th, 2009, 04:53 PM
Ron Paul did his job: gave the semi-sentient White middle class false hope and sucked up as much of its money as possible.

WTF happened to all those tens of millions anyway?

Marvin Nash
December 11th, 2009, 05:56 PM
I told people ron paul was a race traitor zionist piece of shit almost two years ago when he was at the height of his popularity.

I was told by dozens of enlightened ron paul racists that I was full of shit and that ron paul was the best hope for Whites in the presidential election.

To those who doubted my words of truth, as I was one of the first to say it, fuck you and fuck zionist race traitor douchebag ron paul.

Xuxalina Rihhia
May 31st, 2010, 11:07 PM
Be wary of those pushing CONstitutionalism.

I believe in the Articles of Confederation, not the CON Stitution, which was rightly seen by the few Non-Masonic Founding Fathers there as a Con Job!

Xuxalina Rihhia
June 1st, 2010, 12:09 AM
I told people ron paul was a race traitor zionist piece of shit almost two years ago when he was at the height of his popularity.

I was told by dozens of enlightened ron paul racists that I was full of shit and that ron paul was the best hope for Whites in the presidential election.

To those who doubted my words of truth, as I was one of the first to say it, fuck you and fuck zionist race traitor douchebag ron paul.

You were and are right! 14/88!

tristan
January 18th, 2011, 01:37 PM
lets be rastas because they want all the blacks to go back to africa and lets be zionist to get the worldwide chosenites back to Israhell then maby we can for once have A europian day; oh it sux that Ron Paul sold out.Lets hope he is just towin the line to stay in power from this jew media,but he probably is a traitor this really sux another letdown

The Barrenness
January 23rd, 2011, 04:07 PM
Is Ron Paul looking forward to an Israeli attack on Iran?

Ron Paul again stated that his policy of cutting off aid to Israel will benefit Israel because he will also cut off all Arabs, whom he defines in the broadest terms as if enemies of Israel. Paul does not state that Israel has proven itself to be the enemy of Arab nations. Ron Paul wants to benefit Israel by letting them do as they please to the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iranians, etc. and hopes that by cutting off aid to Arabs, whom he credits with receiving three times the aid which Israel receives, he will empower Israel to dominate the Arab nations.

In Ron Paul's perfect scenerio, "letting them do what they want" would be a two way street I suspect. We should be stepping out of this mess as much as we possibly can not just switching our total support to the other side (which is what I suspect a lot of people on these forums want to do)

No, Ron Paul is probably not what would be considered anti zionist but he does seem to be concerned first and foremost with america's interests as our leaders should be and are not. And that is what matters most at the end of the day.

littlefieldjohn
January 24th, 2011, 11:37 AM
Calling for an end to aid for Israel today is meaningless, as Israel, thanks to being funded by America since 1948, is a 1st World nation, cutting off aid now that Israel is a creditor nation is nothing. How about Ron Paul saying they should stop the preferential trade agreement with Israel where Israel creams out of America some $24 billion annually with a lopsided trade deficit, that is the real aid to Israel.

There is as much of a chance of Israel not striking Iran as there is of Elie Wiesel going to heaven.

Patrick T. Mick
February 8th, 2011, 02:46 PM
It always strikes me as funny how we expect politicians to just commit political suicide to remain pure. Sure Ron supports cutting all aid to every forign country. This would be a good thing for the entire planet. Our aid is what allows the Africans to practice endless warfare. If the aid is cut off the soldiers for the despot will have to take up farming or starve. America needs to return to a more isolationist stance. If America got more isolationist the public would be forced to look at our own countries problems. That's a good thing for us.

raynor
March 5th, 2011, 12:16 AM
I think Ron Paul just said that to try and win over the neocon vote. He can't just say "Yep, I hate Israel" then he wouldn't have a snowballs chance in hell of getting elected. His campaign is being ran on "end the fed" and "stop funding israel" what more could you ask for? Sure he dosn't come right out and say he hates jews, but if you read between the lines he is trying to dismantle the jews oppressive hold on the american economy.

MeltinGiovanni
October 26th, 2011, 01:40 PM
Ron Paul is the greatest thing we have going right now.. To say he is a Zionist supporter is absolutely false. This guy loves his country and is just playing games to get the NeoCon vote is what I think it is.. He is trying to get everybodys vote and I think hes been doing a great job trying to get support lately. He knows that if he says certain things a certain way, he will not get support so even if it looks like hes defending the Jews, its only to get support I feel.. Ron Paul might not be perfect, but he is surely better than anyone else out there.. I have to give him that.

cillian
October 26th, 2011, 01:48 PM
Ron Paul is the greatest thing we have going right now.. To say he is a Zionist supporter is absolutely false. This guy loves his country and is just playing games to get the NeoCon vote is what I think it is.. He is trying to get everybodys vote and I think hes been doing a great job trying to get support lately. He knows that if he says certain things a certain way, he will not get support so even if it looks like hes defending the Jews, its only to get support I feel.. Ron Paul might not be perfect, but he is surely better than anyone else out there.. I have to give him that.

They accused him of being anti semitic for wanting to cut off foreign aid, including foreign aid to israel. His response was that america gives foreign aid to countries to get them to do what we want, and that israel should be a sovereign country able to make its own decisions and not have to ask america permission just to keep the foreign aid.

I had to laugh, such a clever angle for a politician to use. He knows the game.

It might confuse some people into saying he is pro israel, and others to say he is an antisemite, but really he just doesn't want to send money over seas, and that's good enough.

John Tyler
November 21st, 2011, 05:57 PM
Regardless of our cutting off direct foreign aid to Israel the jews will still be looting out treasury via the IMF stealing over 50% of all the tax revenues, 100% of the income taxes. The only way to get the jews off our backs would be for the American people to connect directly to our armed forces and police and use them to confiscate all the wealth and assets of the Federal Reserve banks, and have all the gold returned from them to Fort Knox. Then extract jews from anything to do with the American government and the media.

Kennewickman
November 29th, 2011, 11:54 AM
Regardless of our cutting off direct foreign aid to Israel the jews will still be looting out treasury via the IMF stealing over 50% of all the tax revenues, 100% of the income taxes. The only way to get the jews off our backs would be for the American people to connect directly to our armed forces and police and use them to confiscate all the wealth and assets of the Federal Reserve banks, and have all the gold returned from them to Fort Knox. Then extract jews from anything to do with the American government and the media.
Sounds like a brilliant start to me.

As the joke was going around in the commie countries some decades ago:

What do you call a Jew commie floating face down the Danube River?
???
A good start.

Seriously speaking; a single act of depriving them from the Federal Reserve actually would do them in but I would prefer a faster solution also.