OttoRemer
08-28-2004, 02:36 PM
I was thinking about what some members here have said when it comes to naming the Jew, they say that it scares off the potential White Nationalist recruits, but what about this strategy?
How about a top White Nationalist organization which carried out Pro-White actions FIRST and waited for the attacks to come against their organization from the [COLOR=Blue]ADL[/COLOR]. Then it could be pointed out to the recruit who was not Jew-Wise yet, "Look, the Jews are opposing White Nationalism!!"
Wouldn't that work? It seems like there is a problem in first naming the Jew as an enemy of Whites because most Whites don't believe it until they see PROOF. The [COLOR=Blue]ADL[/COLOR] attacking a White Nationalist group which had never previously mentioned Jews or Jewish issues would show that Jews oppose White Rights even when the Jews themselves are not named as a problem..
What do you think of this strategy?
1st) Recruit Whites without naming the Jew, focus on issues of the racial disintegration of America...non-White immigration, Black birth rate, etc..bring in recruits around these central issues....
2nd) The organization would come under attack from the [COLOR=Blue]ADL[/COLOR], the White recruits would know that the organization had not targetted Jews and it would become crystal clear that Jews must hold an inherent hostility to White interests.....Whites would then not feel guilty about attacking the "innocent" Jews because the Jews launched the attack on us FIRST
Because this is the problem right now with the current process:
1st) Recruit Whites and name the Jew, the recruits get uncomfortable because it doesn't sound right to them, they've never heard this in the mainstream media before and they already pity Jews because of the Holocaust movies
2nd) Whites get cold feet and flee back to the "safe" Republican Party..
Apparently it takes a thick skin to be comfortable with opposing the Jews...
You meet many more people on a day-to-day basis who dislike Blacks than Jews. Jews are treated with kid gloves at all times even among people who don't even know any Jews in their personal lives.
How about a top White Nationalist organization which carried out Pro-White actions FIRST and waited for the attacks to come against their organization from the [COLOR=Blue]ADL[/COLOR]. Then it could be pointed out to the recruit who was not Jew-Wise yet, "Look, the Jews are opposing White Nationalism!!"
Wouldn't that work? It seems like there is a problem in first naming the Jew as an enemy of Whites because most Whites don't believe it until they see PROOF. The [COLOR=Blue]ADL[/COLOR] attacking a White Nationalist group which had never previously mentioned Jews or Jewish issues would show that Jews oppose White Rights even when the Jews themselves are not named as a problem..
What do you think of this strategy?
1st) Recruit Whites without naming the Jew, focus on issues of the racial disintegration of America...non-White immigration, Black birth rate, etc..bring in recruits around these central issues....
2nd) The organization would come under attack from the [COLOR=Blue]ADL[/COLOR], the White recruits would know that the organization had not targetted Jews and it would become crystal clear that Jews must hold an inherent hostility to White interests.....Whites would then not feel guilty about attacking the "innocent" Jews because the Jews launched the attack on us FIRST
Because this is the problem right now with the current process:
1st) Recruit Whites and name the Jew, the recruits get uncomfortable because it doesn't sound right to them, they've never heard this in the mainstream media before and they already pity Jews because of the Holocaust movies
2nd) Whites get cold feet and flee back to the "safe" Republican Party..
Apparently it takes a thick skin to be comfortable with opposing the Jews...
You meet many more people on a day-to-day basis who dislike Blacks than Jews. Jews are treated with kid gloves at all times even among people who don't even know any Jews in their personal lives.