Detroit/South Bend (March 20, 2009) - As of late Friday night, hundreds of callers had overwhelmed the switchboard at Notre Dame as news began to circulate that Obama had been invited to give the commencement address at Notre Dame on May 17th. Sources at Notre Dame as well as the White House late Friday afternoon confirmed the invitation had been extended and accepted.

ND operators said the calls simply became too much to handle. Voice mails of the University President, Vice-President, Provost, assistant-provost and PR director were all full by 10pm EST. Operators were suggesting that callers try again on Monday when university officials would be back in their offices.

All the calls were expressing outrage. None supported the decision.

Two Notre Dame alumni who own and operate the world’s first Catholic internet TV station www.realcatholictv.com (http://www.realcatholictv.com/) both immediately denounced the university’s decision to award Barack Obama honors and give him a stage from which to speak.

Marc Brammer, ND Class of ’74 and MBA’76 and Michael Voris ’83 each called the move a disgrace and a smear on the University’s reputation of being a Catholic school.

Voris discovered the news while live on the air with Relevant Radio’s Drew Mariana while he was being interviewed about the week’s news. "While I was actually on the air with Drew", Voris said, "I shot off an email to Fr. Jenkins (ND President) expressing my deep anger that the carnage done to the Faith by Notre Dame is continuing."

Voris shared the text of his email – “It is beyond sinful that a University dedicated to the Mother of God, in whose womb the salvation of the world became incarnate, would give a platform to the biggest enemy of life in the womb this country has ever seen.”

"This is a direct slap in the face to all who venerate the Mother of God. To be honoring a man who continues to do everything in his power to destroy the fundamental essence of motherhood through abortion," said Brammer, "shows just how far the University has lost its moral bearings."

RealCatholicTV.com has pledged its support to encouraging protests and condemnation of the Obama visit.

http://www.pewsitter.com/view_news_id_16537.php

They could get a trillion phone calls and the nigger would still be allowed to speak. A Catholic complaining about abortion...There is no more hollow thing.

With 60 million Catholics of voting age, and abortion is law of the land? This fact exposes their crass hypocrisy and boundless selfishness and their disgusting ability to talk out of both sides of their self righteous ass.

.

This fact exposes their crass hypocrisy and boundless selfishness and their disgusting ability to talk out of both sides of their self righteous ass.

.

And does it not also clearly demonstrate that "the will of the people" is but an ephemeral and pointless will-o-the-wisp - called up in attempts to buttress opinion and otherwise ignored for the bullshit that it is?

They could get a trillion phone calls and the nigger would still be allowed to speak. A Catholic complaining about abortion...There is no more hollow thing.

With 60 million Catholics of voting age, and abortion is law of the land? This fact exposes their crass hypocrisy and boundless selfishness and their disgusting ability to talk out of both sides of their self righteous ass.

.

Yes and no, brutus. Abortion was never put to a popular vote. Supreme Court decided. Roe v. Wade was decided about the time I was born, IIRC (1971?) and I wonder how many jews were on the Court then? I will have to jewgle that info up and see.

I agree that many Catholics are hypocrites on the issue. Also, a lot of them have become more worldly and consider the Pope and Co. to be out of touch.

RE: notmenomore

and does it not also clearly demonstrate that "the will of the people"
No. it demonstrates the will of the jew.

.

RE: deathtozog

Yes and no, brutus. Abortion was never put to a popular vote. Supreme Court decided. Roe v. Wade was decided about the time I was born, IIRC (1971?) and I wonder how many jews were on the Court then? I will have to jewgle that info up and see.
The electorate theoretically decides who they'll vote in as President to be in the important position to nominate our Supreme Court Justices. But as we know, the jew's media controls public opinion and thus the jew ultimately directs the way the public votes and therefore it's actually the jew doing the nominating.

And furthermore, the same jewish media control of public opinion also applies to selecting Senators, and thus in reality we have the jew performing the confirmations of the Supreme Court nominations as well.

This subversive scheme of appointing jewish-controlled political lackeys was well established by the late 1950s. The last vestiges of real representatives of the people were swept out of office by the early 1970s. By that time their numbers were politically insignificant.

Since then, only a minuscule handful of mavericks have reached the House of Representatives, only to be publicly eviscerated by the jew's media and cast down into political oblivion.

There are some who'll argue that the jew's takeover came earlier and they may be right. I'm speaking on what I've seen in my 50+ year lifetime.

In any case, the system set up by The Founders has been gone for a very long time.

.

They could get a trillion phone calls and the nigger would still be allowed to speak.
.

I guess what I was trying to say was that a trillion phone calls "no" (nonexistent "will-of-the-people') and one jew "yes" equals: "the will of the people is that the nigger speaks."

Whereas: a trillion phone calls "yes" and one jew "no' equals: "the will of the people is that we don't want to hear the nigger."T.J.B.

In any case, the system set up by The Founders has been gone for a very long time.

.

I date the end of the Founders' Republic at 1861. But definitely no later than the 1913 ratification of the 17th Amendment subjecting the Senate to election by popular vote.

The timeline you suggest represents a phase-shift in the establishment of ZOG - a consolidation of power following the tremendous gains managed during the "Great Depression" and WWII under the FDR cabal.

I date the end of the Founders' Republic at 1861. But definitely no later than the 1913 ratification of the 17th Amendment subjecting the Senate to election by popular vote.

The timeline you suggest represents a phase-shift in the establishment of ZOG - a consolidation of power following the tremendous gains managed during the "Great Depression" and WWII under the FDR cabal.

I thought that Senate was changed with the second part of the 14th Amendment (the nigger citizenship amendment). I better go back and do some more reading.

Hundreds of thousands of Angolans gathered to hear to Pope Benedict XVI give an open-air Mass, a day after a deadly stampede at another event.
Speaking to the biggest crowd of his week-long African visit, the Pope urged Africans to disperse the "clouds of evil" that had prompted years of war.
The "destructive power of civil strife" had dominated for too long, he said.
The service near the capital Luanda, was the last major event of the Pope's seven-day Africa tour.
Addressing the crowds, the pontiff expressed his "deep sorrow" at the deaths of two women, crushed as crowds tried to get into a stadium where he was appearing on Saturday.
He also wished a speedy recovery to others hurt in the stampede.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7957552.stm