I don't know if i'm explaining it right, but does anyone know if any states or cities have ever been checked out after a presidential election to see if the number of votes for the winner(loser) is accurate.

After reading all these articles on WN sites, i've got a sick feeling they might be fixing the elections and choosing who the winner is and pushing out somebody that is a decent candidate. Maybe it doesn't mean much who we voted for many years if they can rig them.

There ought to be a way to verify who voted for who and then count them to prove if it's based on fraud. I'm voting for Peroutka this time even though he won't win, since the other other two are nothing for us. But maybe if he got a lot of votes they would throw them out.

It's possible that Pat Buchanan got a lot more votes from working class whites than was counted in but they said it was a small percent that voted for him. There ought to be a way to find out and back track the numbers. I don't know how they could check on it though.







The more immoral a people are, the easier they are to exploit.
_____ America the Conquered by Pastor Peters ___________

It doesn't matter. Democracy is dead. Whatever meaning it had is long gone. The jewmedia determines who gets into a position to run for president and then decides which jew-lover will actually be president.

I'm not going to go off on a tangent about Bush, but HE DID LOSE THE 2000 ELECTION BY WELL OVER 500,000 VOTES and yet still managed to sneak into the Oval Office based on a whole lot of things you can easily find on Google.

Democracy, imho, is meaningless.

Clinton knew how to kiss ass and play along. And I quote him "I would die for Israel."

Yeah I know Bush actually lost the popular vote by like a million votes , since the urban areas showed such an amazing vote count, wonder how that happened!
It would be nice though to prove their rigged after an election, by matching the official count with the actual number of votes someone got. Then it could be published on the internet to prove to the voters that they fix the elections and our votes don't count. Then more citizens would understand about the leaders and what they're doing. It would be a good way to expose their games to regular people if they found out about big discrepancies.

The keyword would be "votescam", also the title of the book.

The authors say that the Diebold voting machines are easy to tamper and have been, and there are lots of other problems besides. At one point they had a website but I can't find it right now, maybe someone else knows of a mirror site or related material.

Back when Perot was running, my friend volunteered as a "poll watcher". His job to observe, and make sure there were no outright abuses. He conducted his own exit poll that showed around 35% had voted for Perot. When the election results were final, they showed he had garnered less than 15%. Any hopes I had of voting in the good guys disappeared with that knowledge.