Kind Lampshade Maker
September 21st, 2004, 04:29 AM
The national propaganda unit of government had the following to say about Sunday’s election results:
1- The gains of the parties on the far-Right will discourage foreign investment
2- The specter of the return to “Nazi ism” will damage Germany’s foreign image
Let’s examine mythos #1:
a)- In today’s shareholder economy, there are hardly any nationally owned companies in existance, anymore. A skinhead (let’s say) will not refuse employment for a traditionally German owned company who is now structured where foreigners have an influence on the company’s decision making policy. Such transperency in information doesn’t usually trickle down to the rank & file, because trade union agendas focus not on the racial make up of decision makers, but on matters of wages, wörking conditions and presently, the mobility of a company to move seek suitable- laborers and tax incentives.
Foreign companies have a tradition in Germany, some of them uninterupted during the 3rd Reich. General Motors, Ford Motor Company (which produced vehicles for the Wehrmacht) and a few chemical companies come to mind.
b)- On the contrary, Saxony will be the only province where the label “Made in Germany” will apply, if the nationalists eventually gain control. Any German company who wishes to turn a profit on quality gööds will line up to get in there. There will always be a market for gööds which are not slip-shod. The absence of imported unskilled labor will ensure that production will not be slowed down due to frequent quality control.
c)- The risk of terrorist attacks from non-Whites would cease to exist
d)- Incentives for medium to small businesses would be ideal, also. For the small businessman, the absence of Gypsies and other non-Whites will drastically reduce losses derived from shoplifting and burglaries
e)- A safe environment in an all White society will attract Whites to a newly discovered quality of life. There will be no need for a law-abiding White to live behind high walls and barbed wire. Women will be confident to step out into the darkness of night and children will get a quality education without the interruption from genetic disruptors
f)- Law enforcement will no longer have to allocate precious resources for investigating mafia territory murders, shoplifting etc…. Their resources will be diverted to traffic control, ensuring that a child arrives safely to school.
g)- With these circumstances in place, who in their right mind would wish to live elsewhere?
Mythos #2:
This is true from the standpoint of how the media projects a distorted image of which certain members of the NPD are also at fault. Shaven heads and jack boots should be unconditionally forbidden, primarily because the focus of attention is on these types and very seldom on the party intellectuals (Horst Mahler, Frank Böttcher, Alexander Frisch and Frank Peter Jürgensen, to mention a very few). The media will use any opportunity to distort facts and the NPD shouldn’t shovel any coals into their own fire. Because the WNs are the real threat to the status quo, that’s why the status quo are at an uproar and are using public money to finance a biased front against publically elected individuals based on capitalizing the fear potential of an uninformed public.
Other WN parties in Europe don’t carry this kind of image, because they are wary of the vulnerability to media abuse. In turn, they are much more successful than German WN parties.
Contrary to orchestrated belief, the NPD is not an extension of the 3rd Reich’s NS
government, any more than the PDS is an extension of the former “German Democratic Republic”, otherwise known as “East Germany”. Of course, extremists make up a small percentage of the fringe in these parties, but extremists and moderates make up a certain percentage of all parties, thus cannot be avoided. Nicht wahr?
1- The gains of the parties on the far-Right will discourage foreign investment
2- The specter of the return to “Nazi ism” will damage Germany’s foreign image
Let’s examine mythos #1:
a)- In today’s shareholder economy, there are hardly any nationally owned companies in existance, anymore. A skinhead (let’s say) will not refuse employment for a traditionally German owned company who is now structured where foreigners have an influence on the company’s decision making policy. Such transperency in information doesn’t usually trickle down to the rank & file, because trade union agendas focus not on the racial make up of decision makers, but on matters of wages, wörking conditions and presently, the mobility of a company to move seek suitable- laborers and tax incentives.
Foreign companies have a tradition in Germany, some of them uninterupted during the 3rd Reich. General Motors, Ford Motor Company (which produced vehicles for the Wehrmacht) and a few chemical companies come to mind.
b)- On the contrary, Saxony will be the only province where the label “Made in Germany” will apply, if the nationalists eventually gain control. Any German company who wishes to turn a profit on quality gööds will line up to get in there. There will always be a market for gööds which are not slip-shod. The absence of imported unskilled labor will ensure that production will not be slowed down due to frequent quality control.
c)- The risk of terrorist attacks from non-Whites would cease to exist
d)- Incentives for medium to small businesses would be ideal, also. For the small businessman, the absence of Gypsies and other non-Whites will drastically reduce losses derived from shoplifting and burglaries
e)- A safe environment in an all White society will attract Whites to a newly discovered quality of life. There will be no need for a law-abiding White to live behind high walls and barbed wire. Women will be confident to step out into the darkness of night and children will get a quality education without the interruption from genetic disruptors
f)- Law enforcement will no longer have to allocate precious resources for investigating mafia territory murders, shoplifting etc…. Their resources will be diverted to traffic control, ensuring that a child arrives safely to school.
g)- With these circumstances in place, who in their right mind would wish to live elsewhere?
Mythos #2:
This is true from the standpoint of how the media projects a distorted image of which certain members of the NPD are also at fault. Shaven heads and jack boots should be unconditionally forbidden, primarily because the focus of attention is on these types and very seldom on the party intellectuals (Horst Mahler, Frank Böttcher, Alexander Frisch and Frank Peter Jürgensen, to mention a very few). The media will use any opportunity to distort facts and the NPD shouldn’t shovel any coals into their own fire. Because the WNs are the real threat to the status quo, that’s why the status quo are at an uproar and are using public money to finance a biased front against publically elected individuals based on capitalizing the fear potential of an uninformed public.
Other WN parties in Europe don’t carry this kind of image, because they are wary of the vulnerability to media abuse. In turn, they are much more successful than German WN parties.
Contrary to orchestrated belief, the NPD is not an extension of the 3rd Reich’s NS
government, any more than the PDS is an extension of the former “German Democratic Republic”, otherwise known as “East Germany”. Of course, extremists make up a small percentage of the fringe in these parties, but extremists and moderates make up a certain percentage of all parties, thus cannot be avoided. Nicht wahr?