ZGram - 10/21/2001 - "Uncle Rudi has his say! :)"

[Ingrid Rimland]

Copyright (c) 2001 - Ingrid A. Rimland

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny

October 21, 2001

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

Revisionism having all but disappeared from the radar screen these days, I
have decided, at least for the time being, to abandon my "Revisionist Week
in Review" format and rather speak to the direction our present culture war
is moving.

Let me set up the clip for the essay below by telling you I have this
erudite cyber pen pal who, for the past four or five years, has given me
many a hilarious moment by his irreverent observations of the current
cultural scene.  This man - a European, by the way - has an encyclopedic
knowledge and a ravenous need to seize onto the slightest evidence of fuzzy
thinking like the proverbial bulldog tearing into an old, smelly rag.  I
have seen him trash conventional, unexamined wisdom with such an elegant
stroke of his pen and such dazzling linguistic footwork like no other
person I can think of - except maybe H.L. Mencken of yore.

But alas!  My sweet pen pal has a blind spot in his otherwise magnificent
brain.  That blind spot is called Adolf Hitler.  His perception of the man
and his times does not differ one iota from the most marginal hick in the
street:  It is nothing but pure, unthinking reflex.

The moment I open my mouth to beg for some itsy bitsy re-examination of
what the German movement 1933-1945 was really all about - and how what
happened then might have some relevance for what we see today and might
have to cope with tomorrow - I get the Schicklgruber flung into my face.
Out come the direst of suspicions and wildest accusations that all I want
is for somebody dictatorial to put on his Gestapo boots, take over our
glorious democratic world, install another Auschwitz, run down the people
with dark skin, and do all kinds of other "Nazi" mischief the world has
been taught to despise.

Therefore, when I was sent the essay below by a person who calls himself
"Uncle Rudi", I thought I could use it to dispel a few harmful notions.
Enjoy!

[START]

A "Neato Notsi?"

 What does it mean?  There's a worthwhile discussion question.  We have
created a new political category that is at once highly descriptive, yet
contains a hint of mystery and obfuscation.  Perhaps we ought to examine
the two words independently.

 Neato:  An unclassifiable construction from among that general root stem
"ordentlich" which means "orderly."  "Neatly" is an adverbial form, whereas
"neatness" is a noun.  I think we probably should consider this new
construction a noun form.

 And that brings us to the wonderfully expressive term "Notsi" which I find
so apropos.  We of the "Neato Notsi" persuasion find ourselves spending
inordinate amounts of time discussing what we are "not."

 Not this.  Not that.  It's not 1933.  We're not in Berlin or Prague or
Vienna.  A career as a Notsi can be very frustrating, as you might imagine.
Many people have wild and fantastic ideas about what a "Notsi" is, and it
then becomes our duty to inform them about all the things a "Notsi" is not!

 Some, I think, have the picture of Notsis gathering in damp, musty cellars
where we listen to scracthy old recordings of SS marching songs.  They have
this mental vision of dangerous men in black leather underwear with a patch
over one eye like Moshe Dyan bellowing out a hearty rendition of
Deutschland Uber Alles!  Oy, Veh!  The things people will believe after
watching a little television!

 So, then, what precisely *is* a "Neato Notsi?"

 When reduced to its least common denominator, a "Neato Notsi" is a person
who regards each culture and race of mankind as something noble and worthy
of preservation.  The "Notsi" is definitely *not* in favor of multicultural
societies because of the inherent friction between widely divergent
cultural heritages.  One land for one people living within the confines of
their cultural heritage is the best way.

 We "Notsis" are *not* in the business of making value judgments concerning
whether one culture is "superior" to another; rather, we are simply
observant people.  We are students of history.  We have learned from the
mistakes of the past and we would like to avoid going down those fruitless
by-ways again in the future if at all possible.  Greece fell primarily
because of their custom of taking wives from among conquered peoples. Every
Greek soldier brought home his foreign wives and they lived alongside his
Greek family.  In the space of 5 generations the gene pool had become so
diluted with the genes of the conquered people that the Greeks themselves
were weakened to such an extent they were no longer able to retain their
empire.  That's just one example from history of the ill effects of
intermarriage.

 The Greeks were sturdy people.  They fought well.  Well enough to conquer
the known world.  What changed them from winners to losers?  A careful
examination of the historical record reveals the answer.  Miscegenation is
what turned the tide against Greece and cost them their empire.  Those
foreign brides were their undoing.  This view is completely heretical and
politically incorrect, so you will not likely find such a view expressed in
any of our finer socialist universities.  In fairness to the socialists -
some of whom gave me my Ph.D. - it is true that Greeks were victims of a
long supply line, poor communication and advancing technology among their
chief rivals for the territory.  I would never-the-less stand by my earlier
comment that it was the practice of bringing home brides from the conquered
peoples that cost Greece its empire.  They inbred with the very people whom
they had defeated!  What folly is this?  So, then, we "Notsis" emphatically
are *not* in favor of racially mixed marriages.  Is it because of "hatred?"
Well, we "Notsis" are *not* in the business of "hatred" either.

 What then are we in the business of, one may ask?  And the answer is that
we are preservationists.  We are the original "conservatives."  We are in
the business of conservation and preservation of our genetic and cultural
heritage. By doing so, we are also in the business of conservation and
preservation of the genetic and cultural heritages of every other race and
culture.

 We "Notsis" are *not* fond of the idea of melting pot theories.  They have
not proven especially successful over the millennia.  Rome, in its latter
days, was said to have so many foreign languages spoken in the streets that
if one had arrived blind-folded one would not have any idea where on earth
he might be located!  The Romans fell to sturdy northern Europeans whose
gene pool was not diluted.  The Romans had destroyed themselves in
precisely the same way the Greeks had done only a few centuries earlier.
Decadent living and miscegenation combined to bring down the greatest
empire known to man.

 If one would be a "Notsi" he must be prepared to hear the word "not" quite
a bit.  As in "not in my back yard."  Or "not on your life." Oy! People
look at the historical record and proclaim with a straight face, "that's
not the way it happened!"

 Yes, I'm afraid that all our efforts on behalf of mankind are ill
appreciated, but a good "Neato Notsi" is *not* discouraged!

 I hope this answers your question.  Let me close by saying that we
"Notsis" are *not* scary people.  We are not something to be feared despite
the bad publicity our Jewish friends give us on their History of the Third
Reich Channel.  In the first place, this is *not* the Third Reich.  We are
*not* in Berlin, we are *not* operating any concentration camps, and all
that propaganda you see on the flickering screen is *not* applicable to
contemporary "Neato Notsis" such as myself.

 We are simply people concerned for the future of mankind.  We believe that
every race and culture has special traits and characteristics worthy of
preservation and that we should not intermingle the races socially because
to do so inevitably results in intermarriage and a dilution of the gene
pool.

 When two races interbreed, both suffer loss.  Unique characteristics are
lost.  Cultures disappear.  Traditions become blurred.  The whole concept
of multiculturalism is contrary to what we know is best for our people.
Not just "our" people, but for every people.

 One land for one race and one culture.  Every group deserves the
opportunity to advance and prosper, enjoying the uniqueness of its own
culture and traditions.  We can and should cooperate internationally,
however we "Neato Notsis" would prefer a home land for every group where
intermarriage is not a possibility.

 This is extremely politically incorrect, and I'd take care not to breathe
a word of it in any publicly funded school lest you find yourself expelled
for "thought crimes."

 Have a wonderful day!  We "Notsis" are *not* so bad after all.

[END]

=====

Thought for the Day:

"Former heavyweight boxing champ Muhammad Ali visited the ruins of the
World Trade Center on Thursday. When reporters asked how he felt about the
suspects sharing his Islamic faith, Ali responded pleasantly, 'How do you
feel about Hitler sharing yours?'"

(Sent to the Zundelsite)