ZGram - 9/10/2001 - "What if?"

[Ingrid Rimland]

Copyright (c) 2001 - Ingrid A. Rimland

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny

September 10, 2001

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

Ian Macdonald, a Canadian columnist par excellence and former Canadian
diplomat, has brilliantly summarized another "...what if..."

This brief but poignant Letter to the Editor of the Canadian National Post
is for non-ostriches only - ostriches are welcome to take themselves to the
sands of the Sinai Desert:

[START]

When Lord Janner, with your cooperation,  exposed  the issue raised at the
Durban Conference of "What if Hitler had won?" ( NP, Sept. 4, p.1.) no
doubt  he hoped to evoke shivers of horror among his audience.
Inadvertently,  however, he provided useful food for thought.

If Germany had won, arguably the world would now be a much better and safer
place. And the "what if" is not as far fetched  as Allied and Zionist
propagandists would have us believe.  Germany certainly would have won if
Britain and France and eventually America had acted in their own obvious
best  interests and remained neutral or even entered the war on Germany's
side, a  not-so-implausible "what if" given that the immensely popular
pro-German  Prince of Wales would have been King had it not been for the
fateful  intervention of Wallis Warfield Simpson (described as a "god-send"
by the  pro-war lobby) . As King, Edward VIII could have kept war-weary
Britain from  declaring war on Germany and, following German success on the
Eastern Front  against the hated Stalin dictatorship, could have brought
Britain into a  NATO-style alliance of anti-communist European nations (as
took place in any  case a few years later).  In such circumstances, a
grateful, friendly Germany  could have guaranteed the integrity and
survival of the British Empire, which Hitler much admired.

What if then our German ally had liberated the Soviet Union and
reconstituted  its components as semi-autonomous states under German
hegemony. Certainly,  the Stalinist threat to freedom would then have been
eliminated for the  foreseeable future. Had events followed such a
favourable course - almost a  certainty had the ambitious American divorcee
not come on the scene - the  outlook for Western Civilization would now be
decidedly less ominous than is  now the case. Control of our destiny would
have remained securely in our own  hands.

Had Britain not been hoodwinked into war by Germany's vengeful enemies,
there  would have been no World War, tens of millions of lives would have
been  spared, priceless European architecture would not have been
destroyed, Europe  would have been united under German leadership,
international communism would  have become a footnote in history, trillions
of dollars and man-hours could  have been used for the betterment of
mankind, the environment would have been  protected, the communist
occupation of eastern Europe and the Cold War would  have been forestalled
(along with the  Korean and Vietnamese wars and  Communist-sponsored
revolutions elsewhere), Six Million or more Jews would  have been happily
and harmlessly ensconced in a tropical paradise, there  would have been
peace and justice in the Middle East, China would have  evolved along
Taiwanese lines under capitalism, sharing with Japan and the  Colonial
powers influence over S.E. Asia; there would be no UN meddling, no  Third
World turmoil, no "refugee" migrations, no racism campaigns, no
deprivation of freedom in the name of "human rights", no "lost" generations
and above all, there would have been no subversion and corruption of
Western  society and the democratic political process by a cunning and
treacherous  alien minority.

It does not speak well for Establishment historians and journalists that
they  refuse to address squarely what is probably the most crucial and
perplexing  issue of our time, namely, the real purpose of WWII and why
politicians  (notably Churchill and Roosevelt) knowingly acted and continue
to act against  their countries' best interests. Significantly, honest,
unbiased historians  who have studied and attempted to discuss these issues
have been viciously  denounced as "Anti-Semites", or worse and their
findings viciously  suppressed. Definitely food for thought.

[END]

Thought for the Day:

"Regardless of one's opinion on who started the war between Germany and
Russia, no on ever thanked Germany for trying."

(A Giwer Gem)