End of Issue #34 |

Any Questions?
Editorial and Rants
Bawwwhhahahaahahahahaahaahaaahah!!!
Eurosavage land isn't going to exist in 50 years!
European Defence Agency Paints Grim Picture of Future
October 3, 2006 - From: www.eubusiness.com
The European Union will become older, poorer and increasingly vulnerable to wide-scale immigration from its neighbours, according to a new European Defence Agency report.
The agency also highlights the problems of increasing unemployment and desertification in its 32-page "long-term vision" for European defence needs which will be presented to EU defence ministers meeting in Finland on Tuesday.
The document, described by one diplomat as "pretty bleak", is the result of a year's work identifying the main trends for EU member nations and their defence needs.
The overall picture is of an aging, less prosperous Europe surrounded by regions -- Africa, Middle East, Russia -- "which may be struggling to cope with the consequences of globalisation".
The average age of Europeans, who will only make up six percent of the global population, will rise to 45, while in Africa the average will be 22 years old.
The African population will pass 1.3 billion by 2025 (up 48 percent) with the Middle East seeing a similar percentage rise, according to the report.
Given increased desertificiation and high unemployment, especially in Africa, "the implications for despair, humanitarian disaster and migratory pressures are obvious", the report asserts.
Europe's fragility will be aggravated by its increasing dependence on imports of oil and gas, it added.
Its ally America, focussing all its attention on the rising giant of Asia, will tend to distance itself more and more from Europe, according to the EDA.
"Relatively poorer, older and more anxious about its security, Europe may also find itself increasingly alone in confronting the problems of a difficult neighbourhood."
Europe is also no longer very well armed to confront the mounting dangers it faces, the report adds.
As the falling birth rate increases competition in the job market, the pool of 16-30 year olds available to the armed forces will drop by 15 percent by 2025.
In order to avoid ballooning personnel costs -- already 50 percent of the military budget -- as competition for young employees increases, a reduction in the number of Europeans in uniform, currently around two million, seems inevitable.
Outsourcing, automation and reducing superfluous capacity are among the remedies considered by the EDA.
Neither is the prognosis encouraging for Europe's defence technological and industrial base, which the EDA deems to be already deficient.
"Europe ... must take to heart the facts that US is outspending Europe six to one in defence R and D, that it devotes some 35 percent of its defence expenditure to investment (from a budget more than twice as large as that of the Europeans combined) as against the European level of about 20 percent and that it is increasingly dominant in global export markets".
Among the sources for its report the EDA cited defence ministries, the Paris-based Institute of Security Studies, the EU's military commission, NATO and "numerous specialists".
The agency, under the Council of the European Union, was set up in 2004 to improve EU member states' defence and crisis management and to sustain the European security and defence policy.
Proof all Muslims are unclean animals.
W.H.O. Says Handwash Taboo Spreads Infections
December 20, 2006 - From: www.abc.net.au
By Jean-Louis Santini
Religions that ban alcohol are partly to blame for the spread of infections in hospitals around the world because staff are not disinfecting their hands enough, say some experts.
A World Health Organisation (WHO) consultant has told the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in Washington DC this week that too few doctors, nurses and other hospital workers follow hygiene rules.
"Every year the treatment and care of hundreds of millions of patients worldwide is complicated by infections acquired during health care in hospitals," says Dr. Benedetta Allegranzi, a WHO consultant from the University of Verona in Italy.
Cultural and religious factors "strongly influence" the lack of hand washing, she adds.
Attitudes toward washing hands "may be different according to the perception of 'dirtiness' in different cultures and to a healthcare worker's skin colour," Allegranzi says.
Helen Giamarellou of the Attikon university hospital in Athens presented the conference with results of a three year study that showed barely 25% of doctors disinfect their hands before attending to a patient.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that nearly 90,000 people die each year from infections caught in US hospitals. About two million become ill from such infections each year.
Staphylococcus aureus bacteria resist the methicillin antibiotic and are the main cause of disease transmitted by dirty hands. Such illness has been growing around the world in the past 20 years, according to experts.
The WHO and other health groups have launched an international campaign to improve cleanliness in hospitals. It includes anthropologists among the experts, working on a clean hands strategy that takes into account religious and cultural factors.
The WHO recommends using an alcohol-based water solution to act as a quick disinfectant before touching patients.
The Jewish, Islamic and Sikh religions teach everyday cleanliness. But Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism and the Sikh religion all ban the use of alcohol.
Dr. Ziad Memish, executive director of infection prevention and control at the King Abdulaziz medical centre in Riyadh, and a member of theWHO taskforce on hospital cleanliness, has written a study on the use of alcohol-based hand rubs by Muslim health workers. He says "the crux of the problem appears to be due to the designation of alcohol as 'haram', or forbidden, in Islam".
But he adds that the Koran also recognises that alcohol has some medicinal virtues that can be used.
Objections from Muslims are more common in Western Europe than traditional Islamic countries, according to the study. Memish says the use of alcohol hand rubs had become a standard practice at his centre in recent years.
The Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy meeting sponsors include Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer, Roche, sanofi-aventis, Tibotec Therapeutics, a Division of Ortho Biotech Products, L.P. and Wyeth.
You won't be hearing about this from Al Gore!
Cow 'Emissions' More Damaging to Planet Than CO2 From Cars
December 10, 2006 - From: news.independent.co.uk
By Geoffrey Lean
Meet the world's top destroyer of the environment. It is not the car, or the plane,or even George Bush: it is the cow.
A United Nations report has identified the world's rapidly growing herds of cattle as the greatest threat to the climate, forests and wildlife. And they are blamed for a host of other environmental crimes, from acid rain to the introduction of alien species, from producing deserts to creating dead zones in the oceans, from poisoning rivers and drinking water to destroying coral reefs.
The 400-page report by the Food and Agricultural Organisation, entitled Livestock's Long Shadow, also surveys the damage done by sheep, chickens, pigs and goats. But in almost every case, the world's 1.5 billion cattle are most to blame. Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together.
Burning fuel to produce fertiliser to grow feed, to produce meat and to transport it - and clearing vegetation for grazing - produces 9 per cent of all emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. And their wind and manure emit more than one third of emissions of another, methane, which warms the world 20 times faster than carbon dioxide.
Livestock also produces more than 100 other polluting gases, including more than two-thirds of the world's emissions of ammonia, one of the main causes of acid rain.
Ranching, the report adds, is "the major driver of deforestation" worldwide, and overgrazing is turning a fifth of all pastures and ranges into desert.Cows also soak up vast amounts of water: it takes a staggering 990 litres of water to produce one litre of milk.
Wastes from feedlots and fertilisers used to grow their feed overnourish water, causing weeds to choke all other life. And th pesticides, antibiotics and hormones used to treat them get into drinking water and endanger human health.
The pollution washes down to the sea, killing coral reefs and creating "dead zones" devoid of life. One is up to 21,000sqkm, in the Gulf of Mexico, where much of the waste from US beef production is carried down the Mississippi.
The report concludes that, unless drastic changes are made, the massive damage done by livestock will more than double by 2050, as demand for meat increases.
More proof Eurosavages are the real enemy.
French Intefadeh
November 14, 2005 - From: calsun.canoe.ca
By Ezra Levant
The international media no longer start the news with France's riots, though they continue nightly.
This shift in coverage is not because each morning's tally of burnt-out cars has fallen from over 1,000 to merely several hundred, or because the number of towns and cities in which the riots occur has fallen from a high to 300 to a more modest 200 each night.
It is because the shock value of the riots is gone. The French intefadeh is the new normal.
The French media no longer exaggerate and gloat at America's challenges with hurricane Katrina -- they are now complaining the world's media exaggerates France's own inability to quell their nascent civil war.
But hurricane Katrina's initial horrible estimates of body counts turned out to be wildly exaggerated, as were the rumours of depravity in the Louisiana Superdome.
France, by contrast, has done everything it can to mask the true nature of its own problems -- a large and unassimilated mass of Muslim immigrants, in which a hard core of Islamic fascists operate.
Estimates vary as to the number of Muslims in France. The CIA's world factbook estimates it to be as high as six million. Other social scientists put the number as high as eight million. In 2004, French counter-intelligence estimated al-Qaida alone had 40,000 recruits in France that were engaged in paramilitary training.
That's half a percent of France's Muslim population, but it is apparent that many more are silent supporters -- or ad hoc co-operators, as many of the young rioters were. To call the riots spontaneous is to lie: Police discovered Molotov cocktail factories, and websites helped to co-ordinate the instigators in 300 cities and towns.
By comparison, there are fewer than six-million people in the entire Kingdom of Jordan, the site of last week's triple suicide bombings. Muslim France is becoming a political jurisdiction of its own -- with a population base larger and more radical than many proper countries. It is not merely the Cassandras on the right who see this new nation emerging. The response to the riots from France's socialist parties was for police to simply withdraw from the territories controlled by the rioters -- to withdraw the sovereignty of the French Republic, and yield to the sovereignty of the rioters, an appalling mixture of anarchy, criminal gangsterism and seething Islamofascism.
Stories of honour killings of young girls, or arson of Jewish shops and schools are no longer even news in France. That is the nature of the state trying to be born.
The last time Paris was invaded, it was from a foreign army that marched in, not a domestic army that stood up. Unlike the Nazis, the young rioters cannot be sent home -- they are at home, many of them born there, many naturalized.
Even if this current round of riots is defused, this problem will not go away. France's fertility rate is just 1.85 children per woman, far less than replacement rate. But that is an average that masks two realities, the rapidly growing Muslim community, and the effectively sterile pur laine French.
Last month, Canada's immigration minister bruited the idea of importing close to a million extra immigrants. That suits him fine, as immigrants tend to vote Liberal. But with Canada's official policy of multiculturalism -- that is, to oppose the cultural integration of new immigrants -- in concert with growing dominance of Muslim countries as the source of our immigrants, France in 2005 could be a glimpse of Canada in 2015.
Michael J. Fox sure is silent on this one! These are same people who think genetically engineered food is "bad."
Ukraine Babies in Stem Cell Probe
December 12, 2006 - From: news.bbc.co.uk
By Matthew Hill
Disturbing video footage of post-mortem examinations on dismembered tiny bodies raises serious questions about what happened to them.
Ukraine has become the self-styled stem cell capital of the world.
There is a trade in stem cells from aborted foetuses, amid unproven claims they can help fight many diseases.
But now there are claims that stem cells are also being harvested from live babies.
Wall of Silence
The BBC has spoken to mothers from the city of Kharkiv who say they gave birth to healthy babies, only to have them taken by maternity staff.
In 2003 the authorities agreed to exhume around 30 bodies of foetuses and full-term babies from a cemetery used by maternity hospital number six.
One campaigner was allowed into the autopsy to gather video evidence. She has given that footage to the BBC and Council of Europe.
In its report, the Council describes a general culture of trafficking of children snatched at birth, and a wall of silence from hospital staff upwards over their fate.
The pictures show organs, including brains, have been stripped - and some bodies dismembered.
A senior British forensic pathologist says he is very concerned to see bodies in pieces - as that is not standard post-mortem practice.
It could possibly be a result of harvesting stem cells from bone marrow.
Hospital number six denies the allegations.


These guys would be really fun to party with.
Time Magazine photo caption changes. What liberal bias?

Yahoo! has also removed the following picture. This is not a Photoshop!
It was available at (URL is split):
http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/us/ 110906cindysheehan/im:/061121/photos_pl_afp/6c8fc763c022f25fa01cc2f93865ba3a

Police block anti-war activists Cindy Sheehan (L) of the US, whose son Casey was killed during combat in Iraq in April 2004, and Medea Benjamin (R), the founding director of Code Pink, as they try to enter the headquarters of US Forces Korea (USFK) to meet the USFK head in Seoul. A group of US peace activists led by Sheehan staged a protest outside the headquarters base of US troops, urging a halt to the relocation of US military bases in South Korea. (AFP/Kim Jae-Hwan)
Cop Killer's Caucus
From: http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll527.xml
The House yesterday passed a resolution "condemning the decision of St. Denis, France, to name a street in honor of Mumia Abu-Jamal, the convicted murder [sic] of Philadelphia Police Office Danny Faulkner." The vote was 368-31, with 8 members voting "present." Here's a list of what one might call the Cop-Killer's Caucus, the congressmen who voted against the resolution, all Democrats:
Neil Abercrombie (Hawaii) Carolyn Kilpatrick (Mich.) Robert Scott (Va.) William Clay (Mo.) Barbara Lee (Calif.) Jose Serrano (N.Y.) Emanuel Cleaver (Mo.) Cynthia McKinney (Ga.) Fortney Hillman Stark Jr. (Calif.) John Conyers (Mich.) Gregory Meeks (N.Y.) Edolphus Towns (N.Y.) Jim Cooper (Tenn.) Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.) Tom Udall (N.M.) Danny Davis (Ill.) James Oberstar (Minn.) Nydia Velazquez (N.Y.) Raul Grijalva (Ariz.) Major Owens (N.Y.) Maxine Waters (Calif.) Maurice Hinchey (N.Y.) Ed Pastor (Ariz.) Anthony Weiner (N.Y.) Mike Honda (Calif.) Donald Payne (N.J.) Lynn Woolsey (Calif.) Jesse Jackson Jr. (Ill.) Charles Rangel (N.Y.) Eddie Bernice Johnson (Texas) Bobby Rush (Ill.)
The "present" votes came from Sam Farr (Calif.), Al Green (Texas), Luis Gutierrez (Ill.), Sheila Jackson-Lee (Texas), John Lewis (Ga.), George Miller (Calif.), Janice Schakowsky (Ill.) and Melvin Watt (N.C.). Tellingly, every member of the Pennsylvania delegation who was present voted "yes."
The most disturbing name on the "no" list is that of John Conyers. Granted, this is only a symbolic vote, but is it really a good idea to entrust the chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee to a man who casts a symbolic vote for a cop-killer and against his victim?
