End of Issue #88


Any Questions?

Editorial and Rants

Ever wonder why Jews are universally hated?  Now you know!

Remember, this whole mess was caused by supporting Israel in the first place!

Cancer-Stricken WTC Worker Gets $0 Settlement Check

August 1, 2011 - From: nypost.com

by Susan Edelman and Cynthia R. Fagen

Cancer-stricken Ground Zero worker Edgar Galvis has finally received a compensation check -- for zero dollars.

The 51-year-old Queens man, who suffered sinus problems and then throat cancer after months of removing toxic debris from the World Financial Center, was relieved to get a check in the mail for his court settlement with Merrill Lynch, whose offices he had cleaned.

But he was stunned when he saw the amount: $0.00.

His award had been $10,005, but his lawyers at the firm Worby, Groner, Edelman & Napoli Bern lopped off $2,579 for unitemized legal expenses.

Then they took a 33.3 percent fee of $2,124.

They also subtracted $352, a fee to the lawyer who referred him.

The remaining $4,950 was withheld for unspecified "liens," the letter says. Galvis thinks this was repayment of workers' compensation for aid.

"I have hit rock bottom," said Galvis, who is jobless and $30,000 in debt.  "I was expecting a check, and you can imagine how I felt when I opened it.  I couldn't believe it.  I thought it was a joke."

The father of two, who lives in Glendale with his fiancée and her two kids, said he had to sell his car and relies on relatives for rent.  "I get collection agencies whenever I open the mail.  What little credit I had I don't have anymore," he said.

Galvis said he arrived in New York from Bogota, Colombia, in February 2001.  Hired by contractors clearing dust and rubble from Merrill Lynch offices next to Ground Zero, Galvis said he toiled 16 hours a day for six months in a jumpsuit and paper mask that would tear when he sweated.  At $8 an hour, he made close to $800 a week.

In May 2005, a friend gave him a business card passed out by the law firm.  A representative came to his home.

"The man told me that more than likely I will get sick and I would get 60 percent of whatever he won," Galvis said.  "He even mentioned the words 'millions of dollars.' "

In April 2010, he got a $10,000 offer.  A letter from the law firm said he could expect about $5,000 after expenses and fees.  It warned that if his case went to trial and he lost, he could owe the firm up to $100,000 in costs.  He took the settlement.

His claim cited chronic rhinosinusitis and sleep disorders.  He was diagnosed with throat cancer last August and began chemotherapy and radiation.  But it was "too late" to adjust his claim.

"It was our pleasure to represent you in this matter," the law firm says in a note that arrived with the zero-dollar check.

It was no pleasure for Galvis.

"I think they are taking advantage of the ignorance of people such as myself," he said.

The total Merrill settlement came to $18 million for about 400 clients, documents show.

Galvis is one of nearly 10,000 Ground Zero workers represented by Napoli Bern, which led talks for a separate settlement with the city for $712 million.

Anger is also stirring among those clients, who have started getting checks for 40 percent of their total awards.  Several told The Post the payouts were less than those estimated by Napoli Bern.  Some said they felt duped.

Attorney Paul Napoli wrote in an e-mail that Edgar Galvis had already received "tens of thousands of dollars" in other claims involving his work at the Merrill Lynch offices in the World Financial Center.

Galvis "is also eligible for settlements from other buildings [near the trade center] that he worked in that have not even begun to roll in," Napoli added.

But Galvis said that "never in my life, ever, have I gotten any money from Napoli" -- other than a check that started at $10,005 but that was made out for $0.00 after various deductions.

"This is the only check I've gotten from them," he said.  "I never got a single dollar."



President Barack Obama is an anagram for:

"An Arab backed Imposter" and "Kept as a barbaric demon"

Ever wonder why Jews are universally hated?  Now you know!

Note these assholes claim to be Atheists (which is also religious ideology), but are really Jews.  You can bet that if these filthy kikes wanted to put up an ugly Jew star or Menorah, there would be no outrage in the media.

Atheist Group Sues Over Proposed Cross at 9/11 Memorial

July 28, 2011 - From: news.yahoo.com

by Liz Goodwin

The group American Atheists and four New Yorkers are suing the states of New York and New Jersey for planning to place a cross--a piece of debris from the World Trade Center--at the 9-11 memorial for the attacks' victims.

The planned memorial--which will at long last be unveiled this September--has received millions in federal money.  The Courthouse News Service says the cross--"a T-joint steel girder found in the rubble of the World Trade Center"--was just last week moved from a Catholic church to Ground Zero.  The suit says the cross is an insult to the many 9/11 victims who were not Christian and a violation of the separation of church and state; it proposes either removing the cross or setting aside an equal amount of space at the memorial to honor the sacrifices on non-Christian or non-religious victims of the attack.

Two Jewish plaintiffs said they find the cross "offensive and repugnant to their beliefs."  The brother of a first responder who died of lung problems after volunteering at Ground Zero for two weeks is also a plaintiff.

"As a survivor of the 9/11 attack and family member of one of the brave responders to the 9/11 attack, Mark Panzarino is appalled that the state has permitted a symbol of Christianity to represent a tragedy that affected all Americans.  The Panzarinos unequivocally do not wish for a cross to represent Frank Joseph Panzarino's sacrifice unless it is a Lutheran Cross," he said in the complaint.  (A Lutheran cross features a rose-shaped inlay that, in turn, showcases another crucifix; the plaintiffs evidently singled it out to make the point that any such choice of a Christian symbol excludes someone else's belief.)

Secular-minded advocacy has echoed the gist of the Panzarinos' complaint.  "The WTC cross has become a Christian icon.  It has been blessed by so-called holy men and presented as a reminder that their god, who couldn't be bothered to stop the Muslim terrorists or prevent 3,000 people from being killed in his name, cared only enough to bestow upon us some rubble that resembles a cross," American Atheists President David Silverman said in a statement.  "It's a truly ridiculous assertion."

"We are happy to donate a suitable and respectful display and pay all associated costs, and we won't stand idly by while atheists and their families are discounted.  We seek only fairness," Silverman wrote on his blog.

The American Center for Law and Justice, a conservative Christian legal advocacy group, said that it intends to file an amicus brief backing the placement of the cross at the memorial.  "This lawsuit is deeply flawed and without merit.  This is just the latest chapter of an anti-God strategy employed by atheist organizations across the country--a strategy offensive to millions of Americans, a strategy that we're confident ultimately will fail in court," chief counsel Jay Sekulow said.

Ever wonder why Jews are universally hated?  Now you know!

Note these vile, parasitic Jew politicians called the Tea Party "extremist," while they are falling over themselves to support Israel - a foreign country!

Now you know where their loyalty lies, and who the extremists REALLY are...

Weiner's Exit Sets Off a Race to Be Israel's Better Friend

July 26, 2011 - From: www.nytimes.com

by Ashley Parker

Assemblyman David I. Weprin, the Democratic candidate to replace former Representative Anthony D. Weiner in a special election on Sept. 13, is a Modern Orthodox Jew who keeps kosher, observes the Sabbath and has been to Israel at least eight times.  So it comes as a surprise that, at this early stage of the short campaign, New York's Ninth Congressional District finds itself talking about an unlikely subject -- whether Mr. Weprin, who is unabashedly pro-Israel, is the best pro-Israel advocate.

Just as a May special election in a conservative district of western New York turned into an unexpected referendum on the Republican Party's proposals about Medicare, the coming special election in a heavily Jewish district of Brooklyn and Queens is, at least for that district, emerging as a potential referendum on President Obama's proposals about the Middle East.

"It will be a one-upsmanship on who is more pro-Israel," said Chris Malone, an associate professor of political science at Pace University.

On Monday, former Mayor Edward I. Koch, a Democrat, endorsed the Republican candidate in the race, Bob Turner, a retired cable television executive, at a press conference at which he stood next to an Israeli flag.  Mr. Koch has acknowledged that Mr. Weprin is a strong supporter of Israel, but argued that the election of Mr. Turner would serve as a rebuke to Mr. Obama for saying that Israel's pre-1967 border should be the basis for a peace agreement.

Both Mr. Weprin, 55, and Mr. Turner, 70, have criticized the president's position on Israel, and both promote their support for Israel on their campaign Web sites.

But Mr. Koch said that although he and Mr. Weprin had similar political ideals, he had concluded that Mr. Weprin could not be "an effective messenger" to Mr. Obama.

"I said to him that it's not a personal matter, but I want you to understand that it's an issue that's bigger than you and that's bigger than me," Mr. Koch said. "The president is not likely to be offended or feel threatened by David Weprin, Democrat from Queens, saying something critical of him."

What did Mr. Weprin think of the former mayor's concern? "My first thought is to quote one of Mayor Koch's famous lines: `That's ridiculous!' It's just absurd."

Mr. Weprin and Mr. Turner are vying to represent a New York City district that includes Forest Hills and Kew Gardens in Queens, as well as parts of Flatbush and Sheepshead Bay in Brooklyn.  The district is about one-quarter Jewish.

And Jewish voters are expected to be particularly important in the special election, which is likely to have low turnout, said Jerry Skurnik, a partner at Prime New York, a political consulting firm.  Mr. Skurnik said that Jewish voters tended to vote in higher percentages than the general population, and he estimated that Jewish voters made up 30 percent to 35 percent of active voters in the district.

"You definitely can't get wiped out in the Jewish vote and expect to win a district like this," Mr. Skurnik said.

The district is solidly Democratic, but conservative by New York standards, and Mr. Turner won 40 percent of the vote when he ran against Mr. Weiner in 2010.  Mr. Weiner, who was staunchly pro-Israel, resigned after acknowledging having exchanged sexually explicit online communications with women.

Assemblyman Weprin's relationship with elements of the district's diverse Jewish community is also complicated by his vote in Albany in favor of the legalization of same-sex marriage, which is opposed by Orthodox Jewish leaders.

Dovid Z. Schwartz, an Orthodox Jewish activist from Kew Gardens, said of Mr. Weprin's same-sex marriage vote, "To the mind of many people, the vote itself was the point of no return."  And Mr. Schwartz also argued that because Mr. Weprin is a "career political insider" and of the same party as Mr. Obama, he could not be a "fierce advocate" pushing back against the president's Middle East policy.

"A vote against David Weprin would send a clear message to the administration that they cannot take the Jewish vote for granted," Mr. Schwartz said.

But the Weprin campaign argued that Mr. Obama would be more likely to listen to criticism of his Israel position from a fellow Democrat.  "If voters want to send a message to the president, they won't do it by sending another rank-and-file Tea Party extremist Republican to Congress," Mr. Weprin's campaign manager, Jake Dilemani, said.

Mr. Weprin is supported by the Assembly speaker, Sheldon Silver, also an Orthodox Jew, who said Israel was "the No. 1 concern among Jewish voters."  But Mr. Silver, a Manhattan Democrat, dismissed the strategy of voting for Mr. Turner to send a message to Mr. Obama as "a political game."

"The record of David Weprin is such that there's no choice," he said.

Cynthia Zalisky, the executive director of the Queens Jewish Community Council, called the candidates "admirable," but said that "how these candidates feel about Israel and the president's concept of pre-1967 borders is going to resonate in this district."

Both Mr. Turner and Mr. Weprin's camps are trying to play down the importance of Israel as a campaign issue, while simultaneously burnishing their credentials on Israel.

In an e-mail, Mr. Turner's campaign said its candidate was focused on "getting our economy moving again and creating jobs," but it criticized Mr. Obama as being "no friend to Israel."




Asked whether there was any difference between Mr. Turner and Mr. Weprin on Israel, Mr. Turner's spokesman said: "David Weprin walks the party line.  Israel is our strongest ally in the Middle East, and it is morally and historically wrong -- and strategically unwise -- to blame Israel for the lack of peace with the Palestinians.  That is what President Obama has done, and David Weprin hasn't said a peep about it."

In a phone interview, Mr. Weprin said, "It is very important that the United States maintains that very special relationship they have with Israel, and I would be a strong advocate for that."

When Mr. Weprin spoke to a senior center in Queens last week, he addressed his position on Israel, but fielded more questions on financial matters.

"Everybody's mind is on the budget, the deficit, the debt ceiling, which we're backing up against, and the potential cutting of Medicare and Social Security," he said.  "I would say Medicare and Social Security cross all boundaries, all ethnic boundaries, and even all age groups."

Dr. Malone, the Pace political scientist, predicted that other issues would indeed emerge in the campaign, but said the importance of the Jewish vote would remain.

"There's bigger fish to fry," he said, "as long as they're fried kosher."


Meanwhile, at Valley Park Middle School in Toronto, Canada...

From: jihadwatch.org/2011/07/meanwhile-at-valley-park-middle-school.html

The girls in the back of the room?  They're set apart and excluded because they're menstruating, in accordance with Islamic ritual practices.  (And you thought your teen years at school were awkward.)

This is happening in a public, taxpayer-funded school outside of Toronto.




Anders Breivik's REAL Facebook Page


Anders Breivik's FAKE Facebook Page

On this profile, someone added "Christian" and "Conservative."  Anders was pro-Zionist and a Freemason.  Guess which one the liberal media used?  See the Jew...

(cofcc.org/2011/07/norwegian-killer-facebook-hoax/)

From: www.csmonitor.com/CSM-Photo-Galleries/In-Pictures/Inside-President-Obama-s-White-House/
(photo)/250680

"Change" comes to the Christian Science Monitor.  LOL!