Re: [TSCM-L] Re: NSA Burns at the Stake

From: <Loxl..._at_aol.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:50:13 EDT

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:16 2024
Received: by 10.36.19.19 with SMTP id 19mr459077nzs;
        Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <d..._at_geer.org>
Received: from absinthe.tinho.net (absinthe.tinho.net [166.84.5.228])
        by mx.googlegroups.com with ESMTP id y6si1511764nzg.2006.08.19.19.02.02;
        Sat, 19 Aug 2006 19:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (googlegroups.com: 166.84.5.228 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d..._at_geer.org)
Received: from absinthe.tinho.net (absinthe.tinho.net [166.84.5.228])
        by absinthe.tinho.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2DB1BFA11
        for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:02:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: d..._at_geer.org
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] Re: NSA Burns at the Stake
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:06:22 PDT."
             <44E4CC3E.6090903_at_krr.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:02:02 -0400
Message-Id: <20060820020202.3D2DB1BFA11_at_absinthe.tinho.net>


> If it is communicated, it can be intercepted.

Traffic analysis is far more cost-effective
and almost as powerful as interception, and
you will never under any circumstance prevent
traffic analysis in any country that has the
means to engage in it.

--dan
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:16 CST