Jim,
In reference to Ted: I agree with what your saying about some in=
dividuals who ignore the obvious facts, because they contradict what t=
hey want to be the truth, when in reality, it is not. Reality being t=
he key word.
It would take a smarter person then myself to rationalize why Ted won'=
t face the evidence, but, as you know, there are not too many people who th=
ink they are wrong. All of us think that we are right when we make de=
cisions. Not too many of us, sitting here saying, "Hey, today, I am g=
oing to buy 5000 shares of Fannie Mae Stock", when the rest of us know that=
it is worthless. I don't think that person says, I know it is worthl=
ess, so let me waste my money on it. I believe they think they are ma=
king a wise decision, even though they are wrong and everyone tells them th=
ey will loose their money --- they still think they are right [and everyone=
else is wrong].
Ted, maybe it is just a simple matter that you think your right and ev=
eryone else is wrong. But in reality, can you be the only one right o=
r should you go with the numbers, that maybe your the common denominator, n=
ot the rest of us. It's hard to admit your wrong, sometimes, maybe yo=
u need to step back and look at the bigger picture. As Jim said, you =
can't ignore the Scientific evidence or your opinion/conclusion becomes inv=
alid. No one on this list would ever steer you wrong - isn't that the=
reason you came here in the first place, to get valid and reliable informa=
tion. Well now it is time to rely on the info, eventhough you don't l=
ike the answer.
Have a great Holiday.
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, James M. Atkinson <j..._at_tscm.co=
m> wrote:
From: James M. Atkinson <j..._at_tscm.com> Subj=
ect: [TSCM-L] {3097} Re: Electronic Harrasement To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroup=
s.com Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 6:14 PM
Ted,
The information which you are finding that
supports your delusions is either deeply flawed
and not scientific, or you are so desperate to
prove your point that you are taking weak
information that you may not realize is flawed or fraudulent.
I would recommend that list subscribers read the
following article:
http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/348-gnome-hunters.html
If you need to find gnomes to prove to other that
you are not suffering from mental health issue
then it is very easy to consider that even the
weakest of information, or unscientific methods supports gnomes being found=
.
You need to find some better information.
-jma
Gnome Hunters
Swift
Written by Alison Smith
Thursday, 18 December 2008 18:12
GNOME HUNTERS: A Demonstration
I was recently asked to write an article for a
group of paranormal investigators about how
skeptics view believers. I pointed out that, not
being psychic, I cannot possibly know what all
skeptics think of all believers. But I did come
up with the following example, which I think
helps demonstrate the skeptical position.
Skeptics, you might find this example eerily
familiar. I hope that you enjoy it, and that if
you come across any Gnome Hunters in the future,
you might be able to use it to illustrate why
certain claims are difficult to believe.
One day, you are hanging out in a book store. You
bump into a man who is buying some books, and
wind up talking to him for a while. You find out
that the man has a hobby – every time he visits a
new place, he scans the area with a special Gnome
Finder that he has designed himself. In reality,
the Gnome Finder is a calculator. When the man
finds out about a place that is rumored to be
full of gnomes (which are, of course, invisible),
the man takes his calculator/Gnome Finder to the
location and puts in a simple math problem; like
2+2. Every time the man gets a wrong answer, he
knows that gnomes are around because gnomes hate
math and they block all right answers to illustrate that fact.
The man ignores all other possible explanations
for the wrong answer; like perhaps his finger
slipped on the button or the batteries in the
calculator were low. He knows there are gnomes
because texts dating back to ancient times have
reports of them, and because there are so many
reports still. He even, when he was a child, saw
a gnome, and that experience has stayed with him ever since.
You abruptly begin backing away because the man is clearly insane.
Let's examine this example a little more closely.
The man believes in something you have never
personally seen, and for which there is no
scientific evidence. The man uses equipment to
gauge whether or not this thing you have never
seen is present in a location even though it is
not designed for the purpose, is not accurate,
and has never been shown to do anything beyond
one particular thing, which is not searching for
gnomes. The man does not account for other
possibilities for his anomalous readings. The man
depends upon the mythology of a civilization for
proof. The man also depends on a memory from when
he was a young child, despite evidence that childhood memories are unreliab=
le.
Let me know when that sounds familiar.
Assume you keep talking to this man because you
have no regard for your own safety.
You bring up the points in the above paragraph.
To each of these points, the man has a response.
He says that it doesn't matter if you personally
have not seen gnomes. He has. And yes, it was
when he was a child, but obviously that just
means children are more open to the possibility
that gnomes exist, and that the rules that are
hammered into us in school have made adults blind
to the presence of gnomes. The man says that it
doesn't matter what the calculator was designed
to do – he has evidence, from his many gnome
hunting expeditions, that there is a correlation
between wrong readings and reports of gnome
activity. And the man insists that he does
account for other possibilities for the readings
because he changes his batteries often and is
very careful when putting in the numbers. And
anyway, the man can prove it. He has photos.
You ask to see the photos of the gnomes. The man
presents you with a series of photographs from
different locations. Some of the photos look like
smoke. Some look like lens flares. Some look like
motion blurs. Some look like bugs caught in the flash of the camera.
You point this out, and the man tells you that he
is sure no one in the photos was ever smoking. He
knows how to photograph things because he has
taken a photography course, so they aren't lens
flares. He would know what those looked like. No
one in the photos was in motion, and neither was
the camera. There were no bugs out that night because it was winter.
And anyway, that's alright, he has audio too.
You ask to hear the audio, and the man pulls a
voice recorder from his pocket. He plays you an
audio clip. It is full of static. You hear
something that might be a voice, but you aren't
really sure because the quality is kind of poor,
and there is no context for the clip – it starts
up right in the middle of what the man refers to
as Gnome Voice Phenomenon, or GVP. If you think
about it, it does sort of sound like a voice in
the same way that if you drag a chair across the
floor it might sound similar to a human voice if
it was played back through a voice recorder,
which is designed to filter audio in search of
patterns like human voices. If you think about
it, the sound could almost practically be saying
“Paul is dead,” or “Cranberry sauce,” or “Toaster pastry.”
The man tells you it says “I am Gnome.”
You ask to hear the recording again, and he plays
it back to you, this time with you listening
specifically for a sound that is close to “I am
Gnome.” And, after he plays it again, you can
sort of hear it that way. You know, however, that
humans search for patterns in noise, and that if
someone tells you specifically what pattern to
look for, you'll be able to find it. In fact, you
have tested this phenomenon at home by recording
the sound of a glass being scooted across the
surface of a table and later telling your good
friend that it was a secret special recording of
Marilyn Monroe, and he could swear he heard part
of the happy birthday song in it. And even if it
really is a voice, and even if it really is
saying “I am Gnome” in some of the most garbled
language you've ever heard, you can't see
anything. Audio is only audio. Even if the voice
was perfectly clear, there could be a human being
standing right next to the recorder saying it.
You point this out, and the man tells you there
absolutely was not anyone doing any such thing.
In fact, he has a television show on the Sci-Fi
Network on Wednesdays at 9/8 Central with the
rest of his group, called GAPS (Gnome Activity
Pursuing Society). You go home, glad to be rid of
the man in the bookstore. Luckily, it is
Wednesday, so you sit down and turn on the Sci-Fi channel and watch the sho=
w.
The show contains everything you feared. A group
of individuals walking around, searching for
gnomes with equipment that doesn't actually prove
anything about gnomes. A series of anomalous
calculator readings that don't illustrate
anything at all. The group says that they are
skeptical, but they sure as heck aren't called
“We Are Going To Go Figure Out Whether Or Not
There Is Something Society.” They are GAPS. They even have t-shirts.
At one point in the show, something passes in
front of the camera. It looks like it might be
mist. The GAPS team is very excited about this,
as gnomes are known to appear in a mist-like
form. They run around for a few minutes, trying
to capture more mist. They also try to replicate
the mist. They cannot replicate the mist. It must
be real Gnome-Mist. Of course, you realize from
your seat at home that this means nothing except
that there is no more mist around, but GAPS disagrees.
They never actually call the location “Gnomed,”
but many of the members argue about whether or
not it is. There is one, who you assume is always
the hard-sell, who is very against using the word
“Gnomed” at all. He prefers the term “anomalous
activity.” Then he calls himself a skeptic, even
though the logo on his web site contains, you
guessed it, a gnome, and his show is called Gnome Hunters (GH for short).
You still aren't really sure what the mist was,
so you get online on your computer. You discover two things:
GAPS has a giant fanbase.
There are groups out there that have replicated
the mist you saw in the episode.
After all this, do you believe in gnomes?
http://www.skepticalanalysis.com
http://www.the-atlantic-paranormal-society.com
At 06:23 PM 12/19/2008, TedMc wrote:
>I am not a doctor nor am I a TSCM expert, however I do know that
>something exists that all the information I can find backs up, but the
>experts laugh off. I have a good family who is very supportive and
>wants the best for me so of course I have been evalutated by doctors.
>I do not have time to debate information that is available to everyone
>because right now there is someone out there who is not as lucky as I
>am and is going to lose everything because those he asks for help
>will ridicule him. Maybe I can learn enough to help that person
>before this happens. Good day and please at least check into what I
>am saying for that person when they call, because I can bet they will
>say the same thing that I did, and as you say it is deadly serious.
>Understand that although I thank you for saying not to spend my money
>on something that will not help, please understand that the very
>reasons you say this makes what they do possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=-----------------------
-------------------------
World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, and
Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=-----------------------
-------------------------
James M. Atkinson Phone: (978) 546-3803
Granite Island Group Fax: (978) 546-9467
127 Eastern Avenue #291 Web: http://www.tscm.com/
Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 E-mail: mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=-----------------------
-------------------------
We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we take no
prisoners,
and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the spy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=-----------------------
-------------------------
|