Re: {3206} Re: Telespy

From: little vine <Southern..._at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:57:47 -0800 (PST)

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:19 2024
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: by 10.100.33.4 with SMTP id g4mr1568788ang.22.1230823775454; Thu, 01
        Jan 2009 07:29:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 07:29:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <784e17c7-a032-4dad-b97d-4ff7f8b4fe7c_at_y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 72.20.85.6
References: <784e17c7-a032-4dad-b97d-4ff7f8b4fe7c_at_y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1;
        .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR
        1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <e2041ab7-a2d4-49ab-a6d7-b12d438b1840_at_o4g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Telespy
From: little vine <Southern..._at_gmail.com>
To: TSCM-L Professionals List <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>



On Dec 29 2008, 10:36 am, little vine <Southe..._at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> http://www.telespy.biz/
>
> I've been successfully using this little gadget for the past couple of
> years until recently. Someone finally found away to electronically jam
> it and render it useless. Any suggestions?

In the past, this gadget caught several unauthorized intrusions while
I was out of my apartment. It seems to be a little game that
maintenance likes to play. They always make sure that I know they've
been there... usually by leaving something out of place, dropping
something foreign on the carpet, stealing something that has a mate...
like an earring, breaking something, or tampering with other things to
un-nerve me. For example I once found a soft-gel vitamin in the bottom
of my water distiller. I even caught one woman redhanded entering my
apartment when she thought I was supposed to be out running errands.
She no longer works here, but the crap continues.

> Also I discovered that my phone had a number on the out-going registry
> to the number of my deceased grandmother. The number has been
> disconnected for almost a year.

There is no way that the number could have been accidentally entered
into the out-going registry. It had to be a deliberate act done by
someone other than myself who is saavy about how this specific phone
works.

I should also add that I always delete my registry for out-going calls
after each use. I have a panasonic cordless with a base unit (1) and
an extra handset (2)... I rarely use the handset on the base unit, as
I keep it hidden in an undisclosed area to prevent any tampering.

> I called my phone company and the dial-out never registered with
> them... so I did a few tests and discovered that it is possible to
> enter a number in the dial-out (registry) without it showing up down at t=
he phone
> company. What I need to know is this... I (now) know the Telespy can be
> jammed remotely (...) is it also possible to remotely dial a number witho=
ut
> ever physically touching the wireless handset that is registering the
> call? If not, then that would mean that I've experienced another
> unauthorized entry.

PS... this is nothing that meds or a doctor can remedy. So please
don't insult me by suggesting that I schedule an appointment with a
physician... m'kay? Over the years, I've contacted LE numerous times.
The previous incident before this last incident finally resulted in my
directly contacting the local States Attorney.

Let me make something crystal clear. My grandmother's death was no
accident. She died in the morning on September 11th, 2008. Her death
was meant to send me a message... m'kay? The call recently left on my
handset to my dead grandmother by the intruder was also a message.

> Thank you for anyone willing to offer any input.
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:19 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:44 CST