Re: [TSCM-L] {2864} Re: phones in the fridge

From: Its from Onion <areda..._at_msn.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:04:37 -0500

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.114.254.1 with SMTP id b1mr5197719wai.4.1220468475879;
        Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
Received: from smtp109.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.53.8])
        by mx.google.com with SMTP id m37si6841393waf.0.2008.09.03.12.01.15;
        Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 206.190.53.8 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pe..._at_detectiveservices.com) client-ip=206.190.53.8;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 206.190.53.8 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pe..._at_detectiveservices.com) smtp.mail=pe..._at_detectiveservices.com
Received: (qmail 56511 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2008 19:01:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.20.52?) (perry_at_detectiveservices.com_at_74.222.48.26 with login)
  by smtp109.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2008 19:01:14 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: h3EOhZ8VM1naqKgxQSIqMhOf7jEqOBcFFMPy5K7WEDqWFlN4Y7F.W_NPd1NY1Nbjdq08yRCDRCUpjOtHGAPPnkxwmirnMP3epT809LMilHugwiLsbCk98_i__WkfU6iAVCh1IRhRqGVOzDxmfhbb8ME-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:01:12 -0500
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {2862} Re: phones in the fridge
From: "Perry Myers, CFE" <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <C4E44928.2F349%perry_at_detectiveservices.com>
Thread-Topic: [TSCM-L] {2862} Re: phones in the fridge
Thread-Index: AckN926TrWMU7HnqEd2XiwAX8tM/Zg==
In-Reply-To: <011201c90864$9d04a950$0200000a_at_XP>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3303295274_35937708"

--B_3303295274_35937708
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I got a call today from a respected (so far) business person who said he wa=
s
shown transcripts of conversations he had on his cell phone with another
person. I won=B9t share the details of the reason for the alleged cell pho=
ne
intercept but it was done according to my contact. Both sides of the
conversation were recorded so this was not a simple hidden recorder in the
car. My question is, any ideas on how we can prove this happened? If this
was a clone, is there a place in the Cell Provider=B9s records that may
indicate a duplicate Cell phone ID number was linking to their system at th=
e
same time? Any little evidence may help.

The other person=B9s cell phone that was involved in this recorded
conversation was available to the suspected perpetrators so that they could
have done anything they wanted to that phone. But my contact always had hi=
s
phone in his possession.

Any advice of what to do to prove this through subpoena is appreciated.


Perry Myers, CFE
President
MSI Detective Services
2406 W Fullerton Ave
Chicago, IL 60647
pe..._at_detectiveservices.com
WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM
(773) 404-7400 x 200



--B_3303295274_35937708
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [TSCM-L] {2862} Re: phones in the fridge</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE=3D"Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:12.0px'>I=
 got a call today from a respected (so far) business person who said he was=
 shown transcripts of conversations he had on his cell phone with another p=
erson. &nbsp;I won&#8217;t share the details of the reason for the alleged =
cell phone intercept but it was done according to my contact. &nbsp;Both si=
des of the conversation were recorded so this was not a simple hidden recor=
der in the car. &nbsp;My question is, any ideas on how we can prove this ha=
ppened? &nbsp;If this was a clone, is there a place in the Cell Provider&#8=
217;s records that may indicate a duplicate Cell phone ID number was linkin=
g to their system at the same time? &nbsp;Any little evidence may help.<BR>
<BR>
The other person&#8217;s cell phone that was involved in this recorded conv=
ersation was available to the suspected perpetrators so that they could hav=
e done anything they wanted to that phone. &nbsp;But my contact always had =
his phone in his possession. &nbsp;<BR>
<BR>
Any advice of what to do to prove this through subpoena is appreciated. &nb=
sp;<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Perry Myers, CFE<BR>
President<BR>
MSI Detective Services<BR>
2406 W Fullerton Ave<BR>
Chicago, IL 60647<BR>
pe..._at_detectiveservices.com<BR>
WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM<BR>
(773) 404-7400 x 200 <BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>


--B_3303295274_35937708--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:45 CST